DOCSLIB.ORG

Non Participation in an « Initiatives D’Excellence » Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Non Participation in an « Initiatives D’Excellence » Project APPEL A PROJETS LABEX/ CALL FOR PROPOSALS ENS-ICFP 2010 DOCUMENT SCIENTIFIQUE B / SCIENTIFIC SUBMISSION FORM B Acronyme du projet/ Acronym of the ENS-ICFP project Titre du projet en Centre international ENS de physique fondamentale et de français ses interfaces ENS - International Centre for Fundamental Physics and Project title in English its interfaces Nom / Name : Krauth, Werner Coordinateur du Etablissement / Institution : Ecole normale supérieure projet/Coordinator of Laboratoire / Laboratory : Département de physique the project Numéro d’unité/Unit number : FR 684 Aide demandée/ 9,755,142 Euros Requested funding □ Santé, bien-être, alimentation et biotechnologies / Health, well- being, nutrition and biotechnologies □ Urgence environnementale et écotechnologies / Environnemental Champs disciplinaires urgency, ecotechnologies (SNRI) / Disciplinary □ Information, communication et nanotechnologies / Information, field communication and nantechnologies □ Sciences humaines et sociales / Social sciences X Autre champ disciplinaire / Other disciplinary scope Domaines scientifiques/ Physics, Nano, Astro scientific areas Participation à un ou plusieurs projet(s) « Initiatives d’excellence » (IDEX) / X oui □ non Participation in an « Initiatives d’excellence » project 1/108 APPEL A PROJETS LABEX/ CALL FOR PROPOSALS ENS-ICFP 2010 DOCUMENT SCIENTIFIQUE B / SCIENTIFIC SUBMISSION FORM B Affiliation(s) du partenaire coordinateur de projet/ Organisation of the coordinating partner Laboratoire(s)/Etablissement(s) Numéro(s) d’unité/ Tutelle(s) /Research Laboratory/Institution(s) Unit number Organisation reference Département de physique FR 684 ENS, CNRS Affiliations des partenaires au projet/Organization of the partner(s) Laboratoire(s)/Etablissement(s) Numéro(s) d’unité/ Tutelle(s)/Research Laboratory/Institution(s) Unit number Organisation reference LKB UMR 8552 ENS, CNRS, UPMC LPA UMR 8551 ENS, CNRS,UPMC,UDD LPS UMR 8550 ENS, CNRS, UPMC,UDD LPT UMR 8549 ENS, CNRS, UPMC ENS, CNRS, Observatoire de LRA -LERMA UMR 8112 Paris, UPMC 2/108 APPEL A PROJETS LABEX/ CALL FOR PROPOSALS ENS-ICFP 2010 DOCUMENT SCIENTIFIQUE B / SCIENTIFIC SUBMISSION FORM B 1. SUMMARY.............................................................................................. 6 2. APPLICATION TO THE ACTIONS OF THE PROGRAMME «INVESTISSEMENTS D’AVENIR »............................................................................................ 9 3. MANAGEMENT OF THE PARTNERSHIP............................................................... 9 3.1. Composition of the partnership ............................................................. 9 3.2. Relevant experience of the project coordinator................................... 10 4. DESCRIPTION OF THE EXISTING.................................................................. 11 4.1. Partners presentation ......................................................................... 11 4.1.1 Partner 1: Department of physics 11 4.1.1.1 Research and innovation ..................................................................................... 11 4.1.1.2 Exploitation of results .......................................................................................... 15 4.1.1.3 Higher education .................................................................................................. 15 4.1.1.4 Organisation .......................................................................................................... 17 4.1.2 Partner 2: Kastler Brossel Laboratory 17 4.1.2.1 Research and innovation ..................................................................................... 17 4.1.2.2 Exploitation of results .......................................................................................... 19 4.1.2.3 Higher education .................................................................................................. 20 4.1.2.4 Organisation .......................................................................................................... 20 4.1.3 Partner 3: Pierre Aigrain laboratory 20 4.1.3.1 Research and innovation ..................................................................................... 20 4.1.3.2 Exploitation of results .......................................................................................... 22 4.1.3.3 Higher education .................................................................................................. 22 4.1.3.4 Organisation .......................................................................................................... 22 4.1.4 Partner 4: Statistical Physics Laboratory 22 4.1.4.1 Research and innovation ..................................................................................... 22 4.1.4.2 Exploitation of results .......................................................................................... 24 4.1.4.3 Higher education .................................................................................................. 24 4.1.4.4 Organisation .......................................................................................................... 25 4.1.5 Partner 5: Theoretical Physics Laboratory 25 4.1.5.1 Research and innovation ..................................................................................... 25 4.1.5.2 Exploitation of results .......................................................................................... 26 4.1.5.3 Higher education .................................................................................................. 26 4.1.5.4 Organisation .......................................................................................................... 26 4.1.6 Partner 6: Radio Astronomy laboratory 27 4.1.6.1 Research and innovation ..................................................................................... 27 4.1.6.2 Exploitation of results .......................................................................................... 28 4.1.6.3 Higher education .................................................................................................. 28 4.1.6.4 Organisation .......................................................................................................... 28 4.2. Existing collaborations ........................................................................ 28 5. TECHNICAL AND SCIENTIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT ................................. 30 5.1. State of the art.................................................................................... 30 5.2. Objectives of the project compared to the state of the art and in relation to the SNRI.......................................................................................... 34 5.2.1 Scientific programme 34 5.2.2 Exploitation of results, transfer and expertise 41 3/108 APPEL A PROJETS LABEX/ CALL FOR PROPOSALS ENS-ICFP 2010 DOCUMENT SCIENTIFIQUE B / SCIENTIFIC SUBMISSION FORM B 5.2.3 Higher education, integration into the workplace 43 5.2.4 Governance 45 5.2.5 Attraction 47 5.3. Strategy of the supervising institution ................................................ 48 5.3.1 Strategy of the supervising institutions regarding research 48 5.3.2 Strategy of the supervising institutions regarding higher education 49 5.3.3 Strategy of the supervising institutions regarding valorisation 49 5.4. Connections to the socio-economic world ........................................... 50 5.5. Pull effect............................................................................................ 50 6. FINANCIAL AND SCIENTIFIC JUSTIFICATION FOR THE MOBILISATION OF THE RESOURCES ......................................................................................... 52 6.1. Justification for the mobilisation of the resources .............................. 52 6.1.1 Research project 52 6.1.1.1 Equipement (coût unitaire supérieur à 4000 euros HT).................................. 52 6.1.1.2 Personnel cost........................................................................................................ 52 6.1.1.3 Subcontracting....................................................................................................... 53 6.1.1.4 Travel ...................................................................................................................... 53 6.1.1.5 Expenses for inward billing (Costs justified by internal procedures of invoicing)............................................................................................................................... 53 6.1.1.6 Other working costs ............................................................................................. 53 6.1.2 Educational project 53 6.1.2.1 Equipement (coût unitaire supérieur à 4000 euros HT).................................. 53 6.1.2.2 Personnel cost........................................................................................................ 53 6.1.2.3 Subcontracting....................................................................................................... 54 6.1.2.4 Travel ...................................................................................................................... 54 6.1.2.5 Expenses for inward billing (Costs justified by internal procedures of invoicing)............................................................................................................................... 54 6.1.2.6 Other working costs ............................................................................................. 54 6.1.3 Exploitationofresults 54 6.1.3.1
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Supergravity and Its Legacy Prelude and the Play
    Supergravity and its Legacy Prelude and the Play Sergio FERRARA (CERN – LNF INFN) Celebrating Supegravity at 40 CERN, June 24 2016 S. Ferrara - CERN, 2016 1 Supergravity as carved on the Iconic Wall at the «Simons Center for Geometry and Physics», Stony Brook S. Ferrara - CERN, 2016 2 Prelude S. Ferrara - CERN, 2016 3 In the early 1970s I was a staff member at the Frascati National Laboratories of CNEN (then the National Nuclear Energy Agency), and with my colleagues Aurelio Grillo and Giorgio Parisi we were investigating, under the leadership of Raoul Gatto (later Professor at the University of Geneva) the consequences of the application of “Conformal Invariance” to Quantum Field Theory (QFT), stimulated by the ongoing Experiments at SLAC where an unexpected Bjorken Scaling was observed in inclusive electron- proton Cross sections, which was suggesting a larger space-time symmetry in processes dominated by short distance physics. In parallel with Alexander Polyakov, at the time in the Soviet Union, we formulated in those days Conformal invariant Operator Product Expansions (OPE) and proposed the “Conformal Bootstrap” as a non-perturbative approach to QFT. S. Ferrara - CERN, 2016 4 Conformal Invariance, OPEs and Conformal Bootstrap has become again a fashionable subject in recent times, because of the introduction of efficient new methods to solve the “Bootstrap Equations” (Riccardo Rattazzi, Slava Rychkov, Erik Tonni, Alessandro Vichi), and mostly because of their role in the AdS/CFT correspondence. The latter, pioneered by Juan Maldacena, Edward Witten, Steve Gubser, Igor Klebanov and Polyakov, can be regarded, to some extent, as one of the great legacies of higher dimensional Supergravity.
    [Show full text]
  • PHYSICS BEYOND the STANDARD MODEL Jean Iliopoulos
    PHYSICS BEYOND THE STANDARD MODEL Jean Iliopoulos To cite this version: Jean Iliopoulos. PHYSICS BEYOND THE STANDARD MODEL. 2008. hal-00308451v1 HAL Id: hal-00308451 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00308451v1 Preprint submitted on 30 Jul 2008 (v1), last revised 13 Aug 2008 (v2) HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. LPTENS-08/45 PHYSICS BEYOND THE STANDARD MODEL JOHN ILIOPOULOS Laboratoire de Physique Th´eorique de L’Ecole Normale Sup´erieure 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France We review our expectations in the last year before the LHC commissioning. Lectures presented at the 2007 European School of High Energy Physics Trest, August 2007 Contents 1 The standard model 4 2 Waiting for the L.H.C. 6 2.1 Animpressiveglobalfit . .. .. .. .. .. 6 2.2 BoundsontheHiggsmass. 7 2.3 NewPhysics............................ 13 3 Grand Unification 17 3.1 The simplest G.U.T.: SU(5)................... 18 3.2 DynamicsofG.U.T.s. 23 3.2.1 Tree-level SU(5)predictions. 23 3.2.2 Higher order effects . 25 3.3 OtherGrandUnifiedTheories. 28 3.3.1 A rank 5 G.U.T.: SO(10) ................ 29 3.3.2 Othermodels ......................
    [Show full text]
  • BEYOND the STANDARD MODEL Jean Iliopoulos Laboratoire De Physique Theorique´ De L’Ecole Normale Superieure,´ 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France
    BEYOND THE STANDARD MODEL Jean Iliopoulos Laboratoire de Physique Theorique´ de L’Ecole Normale Superieure,´ 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France 1. THE STANDARD MODEL One of the most remarkable achievements of modern theoretical physics has been the construction of the Standard Model for weak, electromagnetic and strong interactions. It is a gauge theory based on the group U(1) SU(2) SU(3) which is spontaneously broken to U(1) SU(3). This relatively simple model epitomizes⊗ our⊗present knowledge of elementary particle interactions.⊗ It is analyzed in detail in the lectures of Prof. Quigg. Here I present only a short summary. The model contains three types of fields: [i] The gauge fields. There are twelve spin-one boson fields which can be classified into the (1; 8) ⊕ (3; 1) (1; 1) representation of SU(2) SU(3). The first eight are the gluons which mediate ⊕ ⊗ strong interactions between quarks and the last four are (W +; W −; Z0 and γ), the vector bosons of the electroweak theory. [ii] Matter fields. The basic unit is the “family” consisting exclusively of spinor fields. Until last year we believed that the neutrinos were massless and this allowed us to use only fifteen two-component complex fields, which, under SU(2) SU(3), form the representation (2; 1) (1; 1) (2; 3) ⊗ ⊕ ⊕ ⊕ (1; 3) (1; 3). We can⊕ still fit most experiments with only these fields, but there may be need, suggested by only one experiment, to introduce new degrees of freedom, possibly a right-handed neutrino. The prototype is the electron family: νe ui − ; νeR (??); eR; ; uiR ; diR e di !L !L 9 i = 1; 2; 3 : (1) > => (2; 1) (1; 1) (1; 1) (2; 3) (1; 3) (1; 3) > For the muon family νe νµ; e µ; ui ci and di si and, similarly;> , for the tau family, ! ! ! ! νe ντ ; e τ; ui ti and di bi.
    [Show full text]
  • A View on the European Strategy for Particle Physics
    A VieW ON THE EurOPEAN StrATEGY FOR Particle Physics Contact Person: Michel SpirO ([email protected]) Worldwide, THE PARTICLE PHYSICS AND ACCELERATOR COMMUNITY IS AbstrACT VERY ACTIVELY WORKING TOWARDS THE NEXT MAJOR FACILITY. Based ON THE DESIGNS AND PERFORMANCE OF LINEAR AND CIRCULAR E+E* COLLIDERS IN THE 90 (Z) TO 365 (aboVE top-antitop) GeV CENTRe-of-mass ENERGY Range, WE CONSIDER A CIRCULAR COLLIDER AT CERN TO BE THE MOST ATTRACTIVE option. IT IS ALSO AN INVESTMENT IN THE FUTURE FOR A POSSIBLE LATER STAGE AS A 100 TeV HADRON collider. 1 OF5 A VieW ON THE EurOPEAN StrATEGY FOR Particle Physics The COMMUNITY OF PARTICLE PHYSICISTS IS PREPARING THE NEXT EurOPEAN Strat- EGY. IT WILL CONSIDER RECENT advances, SUCH AS THE IMPRESSIVE SUCCESS OF THE StandarD Model AND THE Higgs BOSON DISCOVERY, BUT ALSO ADDRESS funda- MENTAL QUESTIONS THAT REMAIN open. Exploring THE “UNIQUENESS” OF THE Higgs BOSON AND PLACING THE EMERGING UNDERSTANDING IN A LARGER CONTEXT (and NEW physics?) WILL BE ONE KEY ITEM ON OUR to-do list. While THE ONGOING AND PLANNED LHC EXPLOITATION WILL PROVIDE CONSIDERABLE PROGRess, IT IS GENERALLY AGREED THAT A NEW FACILITY, SOMETIMES DUBBED A “Higgs Factory”, WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE AMBITIOUS PROGRAMME OF PRECISION MEASURements. CurrENTLY, THIS IS OBVIOUSLY THE DOMAIN OF AN E+E* collider. Linear OR Circular: THAT IS THE question. The OffERS THE POSSIBILITY TO Extend, IN principle, THE Linear Collider AVAILABLE COLLISION ENERGY AS PHYSICS indicates, AND ELECTRIC POWER AND fund- ING ALLOws. Longitudinal BEAM POLARIZATION CAN BE Exploited. IT HAS A disadvantage: ONLY ONE EXPERIMENT WILL TAKE DATA AT A GIVEN time.
    [Show full text]
  • The Heritage of Supergravity Personal Prelude and the Play
    The Heritage of Supergravity Personal Prelude and The Play Sergio FERRARA (CERN – LNF INFN) FayetFest, December 8-9 2016 Ecole Normale Superieure, Paris I happened to meet Pierre Fayet at a CNRS meeting in Marseille, in 1974, where one of the first Conferences covering the subject of Supersymmetry took place (I also met Raymond Stora on that occasion). In those days Pierre had just completed with his mentor Jean Iliopoulos the famous paper on the “Fayet-Ioliopoulos mechanism”, which was the first consistent model with spontaneously broken Supersymmetry. During the subsequent couple of years, when I was at the Ecole Normal Superieure as a CNRS visiting scientist, Pierre obtained several ground-breaking results, including a first version of the MSSM. S. Ferrara - FayetFest, 2016 2 The model spelled out clearly the role of particle superpartners, R- symmetry and the need for two Higgs doublets. He also worked extensively on N=2 Supersymmetry, on the supersymmetric Higgs mechanism in super Yang-Mills theories, and studied the role of central charges. We published together a “Physics Reports” on Supersymmetry (received in 1976 – published in 1977). This work also addressed Supergravity, which was just at its beginning. Supergravity will be the focus of the remainder of this talk, in view of its 40-th Anniversary that the Organizers decided to celebrate within this FayetFest. S. Ferrara - FayetFest, 2016 3 S. Ferrara - FayetFest, 2016 4 Supergravity as carved on the Iconic Wall at the «Simons Center for Geometry and Physics», Stony Brook S. Ferrara - FayetFest, 2016 5 Personal Prelude Toward the birth of Supergravity S.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to the STANDARD MODEL of the Electro-Weak Interactions Jean Iliopoulos
    Introduction to the STANDARD MODEL of the Electro-Weak Interactions Jean Iliopoulos To cite this version: Jean Iliopoulos. Introduction to the STANDARD MODEL of the Electro-Weak Interactions. 2012 CERN Summer School of Particle Physics, Jun 2012, Angers, France. hal-00827554 HAL Id: hal-00827554 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00827554 Submitted on 29 May 2013 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. LPTENS-13/14 Introduction to the STANDARD MODEL of the Electro-Weak Interactions JOHN ILIOPOULOS Laboratoire de Physique Th´eorique de L’Ecole Normale Sup´erieure 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France Lectures given at the 2012 CERN Summer School June 2012, Angers, France 1 Introduction These are the notes of a set of four lectures which I gave at the 2012 CERN Summer School of Particle Physics. They were supposed to serve as intro- ductory material to more specialised lectures. The students were mainly young graduate students in Experimental High Energy Physics. They were supposed to be familiar with the phenomenology of Particle Physics and to have a working knowledge of Quantum Field Theory and the techniques of Feynman diagrams.
    [Show full text]
  • FIFTY YEARS THAT CHANGED OUR PHYSICS 1 Introduction Going
    FIFTY YEARS THAT CHANGED OUR PHYSICS Jean Iliopoulos ENS, Paris As seen through the Moriond meetings 1 Introduction Going through the Proceedings of the Moriond meetings, from 1966 to 2016, we have a panoramic view of the revolution which took place in our understanding of the fundamental interactions. As we heard from J. Lefran¸cois, these meetings started as a gathering among a group of friends who loved physics and loved skiing. Through the years they became a major International Conference, still trying to keep part of the original spirit. The driving force behind this evolution has been our friend Jean Tran Than Van and this Conference is one of his many children. In 1966 Jean was fifty years younger and for a young man of that age fifty years is eternity. These years brought to each one of us their load of disappointments and sorrows, but also that of achievements and successes. We witnessed the birth and rise of the Standard Model and our greatest joy is to be able to say I was there! Four years ago you discovered the last piece of this Model and, hopefully, this will open the way to new and greater discoveries. I wish all the young people in this room to be able to say, fifty years from now, I was there! The twentieth century was the century of revolutions in Physics. Just to name a few: Relativity, Special and General – Atoms and atomic theory – Radioactivity – The atomic nucleus – Quantum Mechanics – Particles and Fields – Gauge theories and Geometry. Each one involved new physical concepts, new mathematical tools and new champions.
    [Show full text]
  • GAUGE THEORIES and NON-COMMUTATIVE GEOMETRY Jean Iliopoulos
    GAUGE THEORIES AND NON-COMMUTATIVE GEOMETRY Jean Iliopoulos To cite this version: Jean Iliopoulos. GAUGE THEORIES AND NON-COMMUTATIVE GEOMETRY. 2005. hal- 00005072v2 HAL Id: hal-00005072 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00005072v2 Preprint submitted on 1 Jun 2005 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. LPTENS-05/17 GAUGE THEORIES AND NON-COMMUTATIVE GEOMETRY J. Iliopoulos Laboratoire de Physique Th´eorique CNRS-ENS 24 rue Lhomond, F-75231 Paris Cedex 05, France [email protected] ABSTRACT It is shown that a d-dimensional classical SU(N) Yang-Mills theory can be formulated in a d + 2-dimensional space, with the extra two dimensions forming a surface with non-commutative geometry. Talk given at the Symposium in Honor of the 70th birthday of Julius Wess, 10-11 January 2005. Max-Planck Institut f¨ur Physik (Werner Heisenberg-Institut), M¨unchen. ccsd-00005072, version 2 - 1 Jun 2005 1 Introduction With Quantum Mechanics, W. Heisenberg introduced non-commutativity in phase space. This property was found to be crucial to solve the problem of the instability of the classical Rutherford atom due to the short-distance singularity of the Coulomb potential.
    [Show full text]
  • A Singularly Unfeminine Profession⋆
    A SINGULARLY UNFEMININE PROFESSION? WHY? When are you going to write your book? Bettina Segr´e Why don't you tell us about your own experiences? Why didn't you give up? UCB women graduate students IIfi ilr- i+i lei /\+1 Survival mechanism ? Remark by neighbors' son ∼ 20 yrs. of (mostly) positive feedback • home Friend: wish I had had a home like that • high school math & physics teachers • l'X & Brookhaven Dorothy Montgomery Force range strength particles strong 10−13cm 1 p; n; Λ; π; K : : : electromagnetic infinite 10−3 above + e; µ Bob Adair weak 10−16cm 10−10 all above + ν gravitational infinite 10−38 all • Columbia (male) classmates friends from BNL Columbia =) Paris Friendly advice: You won't get into Orsay theory group; get into a lab Turned down by • l'X expt: You came to France to get married not to do physics; you did things backwards { correct way is undergraduate school in France and graduate work in US • l'X theory: Husband already \bought the merchandise" so you must be OK but I already have a student • Saclay theory: You couldn't get a recommendation from Lederman? (MKG: yes) Response: go do optical pumping • Saclay expt: Pregnant { radiation hazards All: only take (all male) l'X & Ecole´ Normale graduates Paris =) Columbia =) Orsay exams Accepted by Orsay theory group Paris =) CERN: 1962-72 Babies, K-decays, 2 theses Commuting to Paris to tutor l'X students 1964: discovery of |{CP + Alice $ anti-Alice & quarks introduced Flavor symmetry: up $ down, proton $ neutron l. ll troJln?U troJln?U *I e-=j___ DrolOrr ?-",l Force matter mediator strong uuu, ddd, sss ? -=j___ * * DrolOrr e troJln?U ?-",l I electromagnetic above + e; µ γ ll l.
    [Show full text]
  • Theoretical Physics to Face the Challenge of LHC
    Theoretical Physics to Face the Challenge of LHC Ecole´ de Physique des Houches Session XCVII, 1–26 August 2011 Theoretical Physics to Face the Challenge of LHC Edited by Laurent Baulieu, Karim Benakli, Michael R. Douglas, Bruno Mansouli´e, Eliezer Rabinovici, and Leticia F. Cugliandolo 3 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP, United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries c Oxford University Press 2015 The moral rights of the authors have been asserted Impression: 1 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Control Number: 2014953047 ISBN 978–0–19–872796–5 Printed and bound by CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon, CR0 4YY Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and for information only.
    [Show full text]
  • Thalès: Philosophie Et Astronomie
    Thalès: Philosophie et Astronomie Il n’y a pas d’obligation plus importante que d’être passionnément curieux » Albert Einstein 1 Sommaire Le Projet ............................................................................................................................................................. 5 Historique : .................................................................................................................................................... 5 Le cadre: ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 Objectif: ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 En résumé ...................................................................................................................................................... 6 Les différentes phases ..................................................................................................................................... 12 I. Conférences .............................................................................................................................................. 12 Les conférenciers ..................................................................................................................................... 12 2005-2006 ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Future of Particle Physics
    Future of Particle Physics Pierre Binétruy Memorial Conference APC-Paris, May 2018 Jean Iliopoulos ENS Paris I He was fully active until the last moment I He was a member of the LISA collaboration I Several articles in which he had collaborated appeared even after his death I Pierre left us in April 2017 I He was a member of the LISA collaboration I Several articles in which he had collaborated appeared even after his death I Pierre left us in April 2017 I He was fully active until the last moment I Several articles in which he had collaborated appeared even after his death I Pierre left us in April 2017 I He was fully active until the last moment I He was a member of the LISA collaboration I Pierre left us in April 2017 I He was fully active until the last moment I He was a member of the LISA collaboration I Several articles in which he had collaborated appeared even after his death I With the discovery of the BEH scalar boson the Standard Model is complete I It is no more The Standard Model I But The Standard Theory THE STANDARD MODEL ··· and BEYOND I It is no more The Standard Model I But The Standard Theory THE STANDARD MODEL ··· and BEYOND I With the discovery of the BEH scalar boson the Standard Model is complete I But The Standard Theory THE STANDARD MODEL ··· and BEYOND I With the discovery of the BEH scalar boson the Standard Model is complete I It is no more The Standard Model THE STANDARD MODEL ··· and BEYOND I With the discovery of the BEH scalar boson the Standard Model is complete I It is no more The Standard Model I But The Standard Theory I The Standard Theory has been enormously successful I It contains 17 + ··· arbitrary parameters (masses and coupling constants) and they have all been determined experimentally I This number is irreducible Any relation of the form λ = f (g) will not be respected by renormalisation I The Standard Theory is the absolute totalitarian system.
    [Show full text]