Keeping the Public in Public Housing

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Keeping the Public in Public Housing Keeping the Public in Public Housing Red Hook Houses. Photo by Tom Angotti Hunter College Center for Community Planning & Development Tom Angotti, Director and Professor of Urban Affairs & Planning Sylvia Morse, Fellow January 2014 Hunter College Center for Community Planning & Development WANTED: Stewards to Save695 Park Public Avenue, Housing New York, in NYNew 10065 York City www.hunter.cuny.edu/ccpd | [email protected] About CCPD The Center for Community Planning & Development (CCPD) promotes knowledge, applied research, and innovative practice in community planning and development. It provides technical assistance and agencies. The CCPD is committed to democratic, inclusive, and participatory approaches to planning and developmenttraining through that partnerships foster sustainability with community-based and economic and organizations, social justice. non-profit corporations, and local Tom Angotti is the Director of CCPD, Professor of Urban Affairs & Planning at Hunter College and the Graduate Center, City University of New York, and has written extensively on housing and planning issues. Sylvia Morse is a Fellow at CCPD and student in the Master of Urban Planning program at Hunter College. Acknowledgements Thanks to the Roosevelt House Public Policy Institute at Hunter College for their support of this research. We have learned a great deal from the work around public housing by the Alliance to Preserve Public Housing, Committee Against Anti-Asian Violence (CAAV), Community Voices Heard (CVH), Families United for Racial and Economic Equality (FUREE), Good Old Lower East Side (GOLES), and Mothers on the Move (MOM). Thanks to the NYCHA staff and residents who shared their views with us but remain anonymous. Keeping the Public in Public Housing Contents Preface Executive Summary I. “Public Housing That Worked” and Its Problems II. The Rise of Public-Private Partnerships IV.III. WhyThe InfillNYCHA Proposal is Not Broke V. How to Put the Public Back in Public Housing Endnotes 3 WANTED: StewardsKeeping to Save the Public Public Housing in Public in NewHousing York City Preface After supporting the organizing efforts and legal challenges against NYCHA’s Land Lease Initiative, we felt it was important to develop a better understanding of how the plan came about and what alternatives exist. Keeping the Public in Public Housing is a policy report, focused on NYCHA’s moves over the last decade to ultimately open up its campuses to private residential development. We try to answer basic questions about how NYCHA got here and We had neither the time nor the funding that would be required for a thorough, detailed analysis. We wanted to where it is going. This report is not the detailed audit of NYCHA’s management and finances that is sorely needed. the important discussions underway about NYCHA’s future. release the report at this critical moment of transition in government in the hopes these findings would help inform We look forward to feedback from and ongoing dialogue with NYCHA residents, housing advocates and York City. professionals, elected officials, and others with a commitment to preserving and improving public housing in New Tom Angotti and Sylvia Morse [email protected] 4 Keeping the Public in Public Housing Executive Summary I. “PUBLIC HOUSING THAT WORKED” without addressing any of its historic management AND ITS PROBLEMS shortcomings. II. THE RISE OF PUBLIC-PRIVATE has for nearly 80 years provided quality housing PARTNERSHIPS for• The people New whoYork needCity Housingit, but in Authoritythe face of (NYCHA) policies that de-fund and dismantle public housing, has recently cut and privatized services. Now, NYCHA policies have supported public-private has proposed a Land Lease Initiative to allow partnerships• For more than for a housing decade, development federal and city and private, market-rate housing to be built on NYCHA operations. NYCHA leadership embraced policies land. The public widely opposes this plan, yet, that saw the authority’s land and buildings as throughout NYCHA’s history it has failed to engage capital assets, rather than communities. residents and other groups in its decision-making. Housing and the 2011 PlanNYCHA, NYCHA’s recent moves• Set out toward in the private 2006 Plan development to Preserve include: Public authority, home to more than 400,000 low- and moderate-income• NYCHA is the country’s residents. largest While housing local public —Public-private partnerships managed by housing authorities throughout the country have the city’s Department of Housing collapsed, NYCHA continues to operate at full Preservation and Development (HPD) scale. —Leasing NYCHA land for new, private development —Financing of 21 projects by Citigroup economy and social fabric of New York City. It cre- —Contracting out and reducing community ates• Public jobs, housing supports plays low an and important moderate role wage in the services sectors, and helps maintain a diverse city. Any loss of public housing units would seriously affect the city and its neighborhoods. way for NYCHA’s moves towards private develop- ment.• Bloomberg Land use administration and housing policies promotedpaved the market-rate, private development. stewardship also comes its top-down management approach.• With NYCHA’s The design, record policing, of good housingand social policies of NYCHA communities are all planned and and most widely debated privatization action, was implemented without true resident involvement. not• The an 2013 isolated Land proposal Lease Initiative, but part ofNYCHA’s a decade-long boldest This is reinforced by NYCHA’s mayor-appointed trend of favoring private over public development. governance body. Residents have little involvement in NYCHA planning, budgeting and III. THE INFILL PROPOSAL policy-making. Resident Associations are not decision-making. introduce 3,000 new housing units to eight NYCHA widely used and have little influence on campuses• The Land in Lease Manhattan. Initiative 80% (or of “Infill the new plan”) units would would be market-rate housing in neighborhoods commitment to the public. Residents offered where rents are skyrocketing. The plan would concerns• Privatizing and NYCHA’s alternatives assets to underminesthe Land Lease its displace nearly 8 acres of open space. Initiative, which NYCHA did not address in its plans. The Initiative thus signals NYCHA’s abandonment of its long history of stewardship • Strong opposition by NYCHA residents and 5 V. HOW TO PUT THE PUBLIC BACK IN although NYCHA staff continues to review PUBLIC HOUSING proposals.elected officials has placed the proposal on hold, NYCHA should implement comprehensive policy changes to make management more effective and major problems with the Land Lease Initiative: inclusive of residents. NYCHA should: • Resident groups and researchers have identified —Other funding alternatives exist. Projected lease revenues would not meet NYCHA’s annual NYCHA Board of Directors should have more di- operating gap or estimated capital needs. verse• Revamp representation. NYCHA’s governance structure. The —Introducing high-income residents to NYCHA campuses will not necessarily create integrated communities. —New towers would be out of scale with existing • Expand the role of Resident Associations. buildings. —The plan would not integrate NYCHA • Institute participatory budgeting at NYCHA. developments into the surrounding street grid. campuses. All major physical changes should be subject• Develop to resident-driventhe city’s environmental plans for and all NYCHA land use the campuses’ “tower-in-the-park” design while review processes. Infill development would magnify problems with —The plan was developed without proper undermining its benefits. consultation with residents. affordable housing and look into the establishment —NYCHA failed to assess potential environmental of•Consider a community NYCHA land land trust as afor trust public for permanentlyhousing. impacts. NYCHA should consider other program measures, potential real estate for private development and many of which have been proposed by residents —The Infill plan views public housing land as new revenue, rather than a resource for residents. and staff: IV. WHY NYCHA IS NOT BROKE —Restore the operation of Community Centers by NYCHA—Conduct staff an independent audit of NYCHA finances by public policy decisions and can be solved by —Coordinate with the NYPD and Resident public• NYCHA’s policy serious decisions. budget problems were created Associations to establish community policing on NYCHA campuses —Employ and train more NYCHA residents in staff through several feasible budget alternatives, positions including• NYCHA’s elimination operating deficit of contracts can be thateliminated require —Promote green jobs at NYCHA NYCHA to pay for police and other city services. —Support resident-led recycling and composting Such measures have been proposed by policy and programs advocacy groups. —Support community gardens and grow healthy food on NYCHA campuses —Develop ongoing support and strategic funds to preserve public housing. relationships with community organizations active • New York City could dedicate significant capital in public housing —Expand access to information on NYCHA operations in multiple languages proposed.• A thorough and independent audit of NYCHA finances is required before specific solutions can be funds and projects, which contributes to mistrust and• NYCHA suspicion lacks among transparency residents in itsand management advocates. of 6 Executive Summary
Recommended publications
  • Farms at NYCHA
    Farms at NYCHA Final Evaluation Report June, 2019 1 Acknowledgements This evaluation was made possible through the generous support of the New York Community Trust and Laurie M. Tisch Illumination Fund. Special thanks to the staff at partner organizations, NYCHA residents, and Green City Force Corps Members who supported this evaluation by participating in and facilitating interviews, focus groups, surveys, and site visits. Farms at NYCHA Initiative Kristine Momanyi, and Hannah Altman- NYC Office of the Mayor Kurosaki. Darren Bloch, Senior Advisor to the Mayor Tamara Greenfield, Director of Building Healthy Communities Project Partners Resident Associations New York City Housing Authority Cheryl Boyce, Resident Leader, Bayview Andrea Mata, Director for Community Houses Health Initiatives Naomi Johnson, Resident Leader, Howard Regina Ginyard, Urban Farm Project Houses Coordinator Frances Brown, Resident Leader, Red Hook East Mayor’s Fund to Advance New York City Lillie Marshall, Resident Leader, Red Hook Toya Williford, Executive Director West Leah Prestamo, Director of Programs and Katie Harris, Tenant Association President, Policy Wagner Houses Janet Seabrook, Acting Tenant Association Fund for Public Health NYC President, Wagner Houses Sara Gardner, Executive Director Brenda Kiko Charles, Tenant Association Donna Fishman, Deputy Director President. Mariner’s Harbor Houses Erik Farmer, Tenant Association President, Green City Force Forest Houses Lisbeth Shepherd, Chief Executive Officer Tonya Gayle, Chief Development Officer Community
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) Properties
    Assessment of New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) Properties March 2018 This page is intentionally left blank. Executive Summary At the request of Governor Andrew M. Cuomo, Commissioner of Health Dr. Howard Zucker and New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) staff completed more than 300 environmental quality and lead assessments in New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) developments across all five New York City (NYC) boroughs in March 2018. The deteriorated living conditions reported by many NYCHA tenants for years have been witnessed first-hand by the Governor and the Commissioner, and have been documented by NYSDOH inspection teams. In 83 percent (212 out of 255) of the apartment units inspected, NYSDOH observed at least one severe condition – characterized as a condition that could pose a health hazard to the tenant(s). NYSDOH also observed severe hazards in 75 percent (48 out of 64) of common areas, which included lobbies, elevators, hallways, and stairways that tenants use multiple times each day. In the majority of these apartments and common areas, more than one environmental quality issue was observed. These included: • Active and recent water intrusion damage, • Significant chipping and peeling paint, • Damaged plaster, • Mold growth, • Insect and/or rodent infestations, • Inoperable appliances, • Malfunctioning or missing smoke and carbon monoxide detectors NYSDOH’s mission is to protect, improve, and promote the health, productivity, and well-being of all New Yorkers. As such, NYSDOH promotes the concept of healthy housing as a means for preventing disease, injury, and poor health outcomes associated with lead poisoning, asthma, allergies, and unintentional injuries to people of all ages.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Lease Opportunity to Preserve Public Housing
    First-Class U.S. Postage Paid New York, NY Permit No. 4119 NYCHA Vol. 43 No. 3 www.nyc.gov/nycha April 2013 Special Issue: Land Lease Opportunity to Preserve Public Housing Message from the Chairman By now, it is clear that NYCHA and other Despite these benefits for residents, I know that there are concerns about the plan. public housing authorities continue to suffer I want to clear up some of the questions we heard at our meetings. Most importantly, through de-funding and increasing demands not one single NYCHA resident will have to move out of their apartment because to maintain our housing. Since March, of these new buildings. We will not knock down a single residential building. NYCHA has been meeting with hundreds Construction only will be on land where no housing exists. Journaof residents, elected officials and community This also is not a plan to privatizel NYCHA land, or any other public space. We activists about our plan to lease – not sell will enter into 99-year ground leases with developers, creating a stable and predictable – land at eight Manhattan developments cash flow for NYCHA, so that we can rehabilitate our existing public housing for the development of new affordable buildings. The developers will finance, construct and operate the new buildings, but and market-rate housing. This plan is vital NYCHA still will own the land on which the new buildings are built. to improving quality of life and to the No NYCHA resident will see a rent increase as a result of the new development.
    [Show full text]
  • Chappell, Marguerite Chappell, Marguerite
    Fordham University Masthead Logo DigitalResearch@Fordham Oral Histories Bronx African American History Project 7-17-2006 Chappell, Marguerite Chappell, Marguerite. Bronx African American History Project Fordham University Follow this and additional works at: https://fordham.bepress.com/baahp_oralhist Part of the African American Studies Commons Recommended Citation Chappell, Marguerite. July 17, 2006. Interview with the Bronx African American History Project. BAAHP Digital Archive at Fordham University. This Interview is brought to you for free and open access by the Bronx African American History Project at DigitalResearch@Fordham. It has been accepted for inclusion in Oral Histories by an authorized administrator of DigitalResearch@Fordham. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Interviewer: Dr. Mark Naison Interviewee: Marguerite Chappell 17 July 2006 1 Transcriber: Danielle Lund Dr. Mark Naison (MN): This is the 180th interview of the Bronx African American History Project. We’re at Fordham University on July 17, 2006, and we’re here with Marguerite Chappell who is an administrator at The City University of New York, who grew up in the Morrisania community. Marguerite, tell us a little bit about your family and how they came to move to the Bronx. Marguerite Chappell (MC): Well, my mother was from Atlanta Georgia and my father is from South Carolina. I gather just like a lot of other blacks they migrated to New York City for work, a better way of living as far as I know, and then we end up - - at first they moved to Brooklyn I understand, and then eventually when the Forest Houses were completed we moved in in the early ’50s.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Metrics Report 2019
    FOOD METRICS REPORT 2019 The City of New York Mayor Bill de Blasio Food Policy Cover Photo Credit: Amanda Gentile 1 2 3 4 LETTER FROM THE ADDRESSING IMPROVING INCREASING SUPPORTING APPENDIX DIRECTOR OF FOOD FOOD INSECURITY IN NEW CITY FOOD PROCUREMENT HEALTHY FOOD ACCESS AND A JUST AND SUSTAINABLE LOCAL POLICY YORK CITY AND SERVICE AWARENESS FOOD SYSTEM LAW 52 LETTER FROM THE DIRECTOR Dear Fellow New Yorkers Our city’s commitment to food equity has never been stronger. The diversity of food cultures and traditions contribute to the extraordinary role that food plays in all of our lives and across our city. Access to food is a fundamental human right, and it is our responsibility as a city to ensure that all residents have the ability and opportunity to access nutritious, affordable food through the systems and resources we deliver. While many factors – including national and even international dynamics – affect our city’s food system, we are committed at the local level to ensure that all New Yorkers, regardless of where they live, their income level, age, gender identity, race, ethnicity, or immigration status, can take full advantage of food that promotes individual and planetary health. Our city agencies deliver on this commitment every day. This work is highlighted in this year’s Food Metrics Report as a summary of the progress we are making to build a resilient and equitable food system. The current report provides a strong overview of the production, processing, distribution, and consumption of food provided by City agencies to the communities we serve.
    [Show full text]
  • A Grassroots Vision for the Development of the South Bronx
    CHANGE STARTS WITH US: A Grassroots Vision for the Development of the South Bronx 2010 MOTHERS ON THE MOVE COmmUNITY VISIONING Informed democracy means that people are not only informed and involved, but central to the decision making process. We are tired of being misinformed and spoon-fed on the sidelines. Change has to start with us.1 Background In 2009, Mothers on the Move (MOM), a grassroots membership-led organization based in the South Bronx, developed and implemented a three-part Community Visioning Process. MOM’s goal for the visioning process was to develop an alternative to gentrification by having community members imagine their ideal community and identify concrete steps to build that community in the South Bronx. The year long, three-part visioning process aimed to inspire the community to think big about the future development of the South Bronx. Each step of the process, including goals, curricula and facilitation agenda, were developed by a team of MOM leaders with support from staff. During the first part of the visioning process, MOM collectively analyzed the issues facing residents using the Right to the City Alliance’s 101 workshop that was tailored to the South Bronx. In particular, MOM focused on how gentrification and the forces behind gentrification are affecting the development of the neighborhood and the impact this has on residents. Based on this workshop and analysis of gentrification, MOM planned a community visioning session to develop an alternative community-based vision for the South Bronx. Held on April 18th 2009 at the Iglesia Evangelical Española Del Bronx and attended by almost 100 community members, the extensive visioning session lasted all day.
    [Show full text]
  • The City of New York Department of Investigation 1
    The City of New York Department of Investigation ROSE GILL HEARN COMMISSIONER 80 MAIDEN LANE Release # 40-2005 NEW YORK, NY 10038 nyc.gov/html/doi 212-825-5900 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: EMILY GEST WEDNESDAY, JUNE 22, 2005 (212) 825-5931 DOI ARRESTS NYCHA CARETAKER WHO FORGED DOCTOR’S NOTES TO TRY TO JUSTIFY HIS EXCESSIVE ABSENCES FROM WORK ROSE GILL HEARN, Commissioner of the New York City Department of Investigation (DOI), announced today the arrest of New York City Housing Authority (“NYCHA”) employee KASSAN JONES, for allegedly submitting three forged doctor’s notes to NYCHA in an attempt to justify his excessive absences from work. JONES, 24, a resident of NYCHA’s Forest Houses in the Bronx since 1988, will be charged with Criminal Possession of a Forged Instrument in the Second Degree and Offering a False Instrument for Filing in the First Degree. If convicted, he faces up to seven years in prison. JONES, a NYCHA Caretaker since 1999 who is currently assigned to NYCHA’s Butler Houses in the Bronx, had been disciplined in the past for his excessive absences and lateness. For example, in a four-month period alone, Jones was disciplined for being ABSENT WITHOUT LEAVE six times and late to work 29 times. He allegedly submitted three false doctor’s notes in an attempt to justify his absences from work on January 10, 2004; December 20, 2004; and March 10, 2005. The notes were allegedly signed by a Doctor from Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center. DOI investigators determined that the Doctor has not been affiliated with Columbia since September 2003, and she did not complete and/or sign the notes Jones had submitted to NYCHA.
    [Show full text]
  • Artforum.Com / in Print
    Ligon, Glenn. “Thomas Is a Trip.” Artforum 52, no. 3 (November 2013): 228-232. IN PRINT NOVEMBER 2013 New York City Housing Authority rendering, ca. 1960. Center: McKinley Houses (formerly Forest South Houses). Top left: Forest Houses. AT A CONFERENCE ON MULTICULTURALISM a long time ago and far, far away, the critic bell hooks declared, “Love will take you places you might not ordinarily go,” and, indeed, it was Love that propelled Swiss artist Thomas Hirschhorn to locate his Gramsci Monument, 2013—the fourth and final iteration of a series of artworks dedicated to major writers and philosophers—at the Forest Houses in the South Bronx, a New York City Housing Authority complex of fifteen high-rise buildings encircling a vast, albeit ill-maintained, green space. It was not love of the projects per se, however, that led Hirschhorn to get down uptown, but his love for what he has called the “non-exclusive audience,” one that might be encountered in urban areas outside the confines of galleries and museums, such as those operated by the Dia Art Foundation, which sponsored his installation. Perched atop a large platform, the Gramsci Monument consisted of a cluster of shack-like plywood pavilions that contained a radio broadcast station, a library, an exhibition space, an art workshop, a café, and an Internet room, as well as a stage for lectures and performances. The compound operated seven days a week under the full-time supervision of the artist and curator Yasmil Raymond (as Dia’s “ambassador”) until mid-September, when it was dismantled and its parts given away by lottery.
    [Show full text]
  • March Is Women's History Month
    Vol. 34, No. 3 First Class U.S. Postage Paid — Permit No. 4119, New York, N.Y. 10007 March 2004 OVER 900 NYCHA RESIDENTS RECYCLING OF GLASS Groundbreaking For the New Addabbo CELEBRATE BLACK HISTORY TO RESUME IN APRIL: A GOOD TIME TO Family Health Center In Far Rockaway MONTH AT THE BRONX ZOO CHECK YOUR By Eileen Elliott APARTMENT TO ed by the Joseph P. Addabbo Family Health Center Executive REMOVE OLD JARS Director Dr. J.R. Peter Nelson, executives and staff from the New AND BOTTLES LYo rk City Housing Authority (NYCHA) and Addabbo joined elected officials past and present at the corner of Beach Channel Drive By Anthony Solomita and Beach 62nd Street on the morning of February 20th to break ground NYCHA Recycling for a brand new Addabbo Health Center. Upon its completion (estimated Coordinator for Spring 2005), the $10 million, 21,000-square-foot center will house health care services along with education and job training services for Recycling of all glass articles more than 1,800 families of NYCHA’s Ocean Bay Apartments and other such as bottles and jars will residents of the Far Rockaway community. resume in April. For NYCHA residents, no extra effort is NYCHA has committed $1.5 Joseph Farro represented NYCHA required. As of April 1st, sim- million in HOPE VI funds to the at the event. ply drop bottles, jars and other new Addabbo Family Health Cen- “Addabbo is the largest health glassware into a container des- ter as part of its $180 million com- care provider in this area,” said Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Melo’ Unveils Renovated Basketball Court at Red Hook East Houses Recreation Space Refurbished Thanks to the Carmelo Anthony Foundation and Jpmorgan Chase
    First-Class U.S. Postage Paid New York, NY Permit No. 4119 NYCHA Vol. 43 No. 6 www.nyc.gov/nycha July/August 2013 ‘Melo’ Unveils Renovated Basketball Court at Red Hook East Houses Recreation space refurbished thanks to the Carmelo Anthony Foundation and JPMorgan Chase Additional reporting by Zodet Negrón ew York Knicks All-Star Carmelo NYCHA Chairman John B. Rhea. “The NAnthony paid a visit to the Red Red Hook youth who play on the court Hook East Houses on June 27 toJourna cut the in the years ahead will know that the l ribbon on a newly refurbished basketball NBA’s top scorer for 2013 had their in- court and watch the next generation of terest in mind and made their recreation kids show off their skills. The Carmelo a priority.” Anthony Foundation and JPMorgan For 17-year old Red Hook resident Chase funded the re-pavement of the Sky Seay – who was showing his young- basketball court, which also got a new er neighbors how to slam dunk – the paint job and received new logos. The newly renovated court will make a big backboards and rims received a new difference for the kids in the community. coat of paint and repairs were made to He recalled how the court used to be in the surrounding fence. bad shape and had no nets. “I’m glad “I’m thankful for the privilege to give he came and renovated the court,” said back,” said Mr. Anthony, who spent Mr. Seay, who has a scholarship to play his early childhood in the Red Hook college basketball at California State Houses.
    [Show full text]
  • URBAN DIVIDES Terrains of Contestation: Contents the Politics of Designing Urban Adaption
    PERSPECTA 50 2 URBAN DIVIDES Terrains of Contestation: Contents The Politics of Designing Urban Adaption 63 Kian Goh Preface A Metropolis – Meghan McAllister Not an Enclave 7 and Mahdi Sabbagh Gaza Ring City Michael Sorkin 75 with Terreform Foreword 8 Jon Calame Forever Transient: Life at the “Affordable” Mexican Periphery Power Lines: Boundaries of Erasure and Expansion Tatiana Bilbao Estudio 85 with Onnis Luque in Los Angeles 15 Dana Cuff Deepening Division: Interpreting Scales of Spatial Contestation in Johannesburg {Dis}Incorporation: Further Notes on the City 103 Guy Trangoš as a Legal Concept 27 Jesse Vogler Separation Anxiety: Inequality and Exclusion in Athens and Cape Town (Re)Connecting Belfast: Mobility Justice Alfredo Brillembourg, 121 Hubert Klumpner and Alexis Kalagas in Divided Cities Mark Hackett and 36 Ken Sterrett “Along Sound Lines”: Drawing up Dubai’s Labor Camps from 1950 to 2008 Watercraft: Detroit Water Infrastructure and Its 132 Todd Reisz Protocols of Sprawl and Displacement 44 Mitch McEwen Jerusalem's Divisions: Transmedia Urbanism: Architectures and Topographies Berlusconi and the Birth of Urban Violence of Targeted Difference 144 Annabel Jane Wharton 243 Andrés Jaque Evidence: Visualizing Urban Divides Open Portals: Meghan McAllister On the Divisions and Permeabilities 153 and Mahdi Sabbagh of Global Chinatowns 252 Gary W. McDonogh Traversals: In and Out of the Dadaab Refugee Camps The Making of a Public: Anooradha Iyer Siddiqi Guerilla Art 173 and Alishine Hussein Osman in the 1970s and ‘80s 264 Jenny Holzer The Concrete Tent: A Paradox of Permanent Temporality Toward new possibility in Decolonizing Architecture Art the public realm, together: 193 Residency Polis Station Jeanne Gang and 282 Alissa Anderson Heritage, Modernity, and Difference in Contemporary Indian Urbanism Urban Commoning in Cities Divided: Field Notes from 202 Jyoti Hosagrahar Hong Kong and Taipei 292 Jeffrey Hou Rio’s Favelas: The Power of Informal Urbanism Radical Urbanism in the Divided City: On M.
    [Show full text]
  • August 2015 Inside This Issue 5 6 9
    VOL. 45 NO. 5 AUGUST 2015 INSIDE THIS ISSUE 5 6 9 Eight Miles of Sidewalk Sheds Gone Take the pledge Fix-It-Forward A JOB AND A VOICE RESIDENTS LAUNCH WORKER Summer Fun in COOPERATIVE IN QUEENS A group of Astoria Houses residents has launched a worker-owned security services business. Called OnPoint the City Streets Security, it is the first-ever worker cooperative launched by and for public housing residents in the This summer, almost 10,000 New York New York City area. City children had the opportunity to Created with guidance from the have fun in the city streets, when the nonprofit organization Urban Up- Police Athletic League (PAL) closed off bound, whose mission is to “break streets throughout the five boroughs cycles of poverty in public housing for its annual Playstreets. Every neighborhoods,” OnPoint Security year since 1914, PAL Playstreets has currently employs six residents and is provided kids with a safe, supervised in the process of training an addi- space to play sports, do arts & crafts, tional 30 Astoria Houses residents for listen to and play music, and dance positions with the business, accord- during the summer months. This ing to Fritz Vincent, the company’s year, the program ran from July 6 general manager. The business will to August 21 and some of the fun provide security services to buildings, games included double Dutch, tug- night clubs, and businesses providing of-war, skelly, and rock climbing. PAL special events. After six months of Playstreets were held at ten NYCHA employment, employees are able to locations: Monroe, Forest, Brownsville, buy shares in the company and be- Linden, Marlboro, Ocean Bay, Wagner, come part-owners of OnPoint, sharing Grant, Morris, and Mariner’s Harbor.
    [Show full text]