"Deep-Seated Salt Dissolution in the Delaware Basin, Texas and New

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

4 New Mexico Geological Society, Special Publ~cationNo. 10,1981,pp. 133-145. Y 1 4 DEEP-SEATED SALT DISSOLUTION IN THE DELAWARE BASIN, TEXAS AND NEW MEXICO ROGER Y. ANDERSON Department of Geology University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131 ABSTRACT Hiss's (1976) map of the structure of the Rustler Formation pro- Patterns of salt dissolution in the Delaware Basin are related to vided a well-defined picture of the location and configuration of the bedrock geometry and hydrology that developed following the depressions formed by this type of deep dissolution and re uplift, tilting, and erosion in the late Cenozoic, and the greatest solved them into smaller isolated but interconnecteddepressions. volume of salt has been removed since that time. During the Per- Hiss's (1975) report on the hydrology of the Delaware Basin pro- mian, some salt was dissolved from the to^ of the Castile Forma- vides a basis for interpreting a relationship between these patterns tion before deposition of the Salado orm mat ion and from the top of dissolution and the regional basin and reef aquifers. These rela- of the Salado before deposition of the Rustler Formation. In addi- tionships, as well as the occurrence of a number of smaller more tion, some salt dissolution occurred after the Permian and before localized dissolution features, suggest how regional dissolution the Cretaceous. Post-uplift surface dissolution has progressed has progressed throughout the basin and how it is likely to pro- across the Delaware Basin from south to north and west to east ceed in the future. Additionally, these relationships suggest some and generally down the regional dip. Deep-seated dissolution has mechanisms that might account for the patterns of deep-seated occurred around the margin of the basin where the Capitan Lime dissolution in the basin. stone aquifer is in contact with the Permian evaporites and within the basin where selective dissolution in the lower Salado has WENT OF DISSOLUTION undercut the overlying salt beds of the middle and upper Salado. Dissolution has not advanced down regional dip uniformly but has ' Extensive dissolution in the Delaware Basin has long been left outliers of salt and has progressed selectively into structurally recognized by geologists studying the more extensive Permian predisposed areas. This selective advance has significance for the Basin. Hills (1968) suggested that river underflow had worked stability of the U.S. Department of Energy's Waste Isolation Pilot down dip and reached far into the subsurface and that the dis- Plant (WIPP) site. turbed hydrodynamic balance following uplift may have reached as far as the eastern edge of the Delaware Basin. The amount of INTRODUCTION salt dissolution in the Delaware Basin, however, has been difficult The Delaware Basin of southeastern New Mexico and western to document because the original extent of the salt beds was not Texas contains thick carbonate and evaporite sequences depos- known or recognized. The problem was simplified with the discov- ited during the Permian (Table 1). The upper Permian carbonate ery that each salt bed in the Castile Formation (Table 1) in the rocks of the Capitan reef form the margins of the Delaware Basin. eastern part of the basin had a correlative bed of dissolution brec- Within and overlying this reef are thick evaporite deposits which cia in the western part of the basin (Anderson and others, 1978). are being considered as the host rock for the Department of Dissolution breccias have also been recognized within 6 mi (10 km) of the western edge of the basin (Castile outcrop along U.S. Energy's Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). The dissolution history of these evaporite rocks is of primary importance for the stability Highway 621180, near Texas State line; shown as H-Ill breccia on of th~srepository site, and this paper discusses recent studies of Figure 2). These breccias showed that the western edge of salt in dissolution in the basin. the basin for all units is the result of dissolution, and original salt The principal areas of salt dissolution in Cenozoic time within the thickness followed trends that were approximately east-west in Delaware Basin (fig. 1) were identified by Maley and Huffington the basin. These breccias also showed that removal of salt and the (1953) who recognized that a number of deep structural depres- subsequent uniting of anhydrite beds previously separated by salt sions on the Permian Rustler Formation were filled with Cenozoic beds were responsible for many of the difficulties in log (sub- deposits. One major trend of these depressions has developed surface) correlation and interpretation within the evaporites. Re- along the inner margin of the buried Permian Capitan reef (a major vised correlations, based on this new information, showed that aquifer) along the eastern side of the basin (fig. 2) in areas of thin or only a relat~velynarrow band of salt along the eastern side of the missing Permian Salado Formation salt. A second trend follows the basin has escaped the effects of regional dissolution (fig. 2). axis of the Pecos River in the central part of the basin, but the The original thickness of salt beds in the basin was reconstructed stratigraphic units affected by dissolution were not recognized using the trends established in the undissolved areas (see Ander- until Anderson and others (1972) found that large quantities of son and others, 1972; figs. 13, 15, 16, 17), and the original volume bedded salt were missing from the middle of the evaporite se of salt in the major units was estimated (fig. 3). A comparison with quence near the center of the basin. Further work (Anderson and the postdissolution volume shows that approximately 50 percent others, 1978) demonstrated that large depressions in the basin of the salt originally in the basin now remains. The lower Salado were the result of selective dissolution of lower Salado salt beds has had the greatest proportion of salt removed, with about 27 and that a (previously unsuspected) variety of deep-seated dasolu- percent of the original salt remaining reflecting the dissolution tion processes had undermined the overlying salt beds in the that has undercut overlying salt beds recognized by Anderson and others (1972). [NEW MEXICO GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY I 0; Fig. 2- 0- 100 200- 300 KILOMETERS \ TEXAS ----- I 0 10 20 30 40 50 KILOMETERS - I F~gureI. Index map showing location and outline of Dela ware Basin and locations of Figures 2,5, and 6. PRE-CENOZOIC DISSOLUTION high as the lower Salado and that, clearly, were implaced by col- Adams (1944) was correct in identifying a significant break in lapse after late Cenozoic uplift (Castile A of Kirkland and Evans, deposition between the Castile and Salado formations. Correla- 1976). Lang (1947) described how similar patches of Cretaceous tions of laminae with records of geophysical logs indicate that this rocks had been trapped in sinks or cavernous channels and were break was accompanied by dissolution of salt from thesalt beds in stratigraphically out of place. Also, Udden (1915) originally as- the Anhydrite IV and Halite Ill of the Castile Formation (fig. 3) from cribed a Cretaceous age to the Castile Formation because he around the margins but not in the center of the basin. The original found Cretaceous age cuttings 265 ft (76 m) below the top of the delineation of a wedge of undercutting dissolution within the Castile in an area overlain by the Rustler Formation and which evaporites (Anderson, 1978) incorporated some of the missing salt could only have been emplaced by a deep collapse. beds from the upper part of the Castile, and it is now believed that A truncation surface sufficient to allow precretaceous dissolu- some of this material was removed before the Salado was depos- tion to reach into the Castile Formation would require a regional ited, leaving a dissolution residue. The salt that was removed dip in the Cretaceous of 100 ftlmi (19 mlkm) to account for even before Salado deposition was not used in estimating the percent the present thickness of thestratigraphic section farther east in the of salt later removed from the basin (fig. 3). basin. Inasmuch as this is the present regional dip following uplift, Baltz (1959), King (1942), and Adams (1944) recognized an angu- extensive pre-Cretaceous truncation and dissolution would allow lar contact between the Rustler and Salado formations in the no space for the recognized post-Cretaceous uplift. western part of the basin. The amount of salt removed cannot be The Salado and Rustler formations are now stripped from the estimated, but the unconformity is not considered major and the western half of the basin, so it is not possible to determine if salt contact between the two units within the basin is conformable was dissolved before Cretaceous time. lsopach maps of the mid- (Kroenlein, 1939; Pierce and Rich, 1962). dle and upper Salado (Anderson, 1978, figs. 9, 10) show regionally Triassic rocks were eroded and stripped from an area west of the normal thickness trends extending westward to the area of pres- present Delaware Basin (McKee and others, 1959; Bachman, 1974), ent truncation indicating that dissolution, if it took place, was con- and Cretaceous beds rest directly on the Permian. Some disso- fined to the upper part of the Salado in the western part of the lution of salt from the upper part of the evaporites may have basin. occurred during this interval. More recently, Bachman (1980) has CENOZOIC DISSOLUTION suggested that small patches of Cretaceous rocks resting on the Castile Formation inside the western part of the basin indicate a Structural and Stratigraphic Controls more profound episode of dissolution extending down into the Large-scale dissolution of salt from the Delaware Basin occurred Castile.
Recommended publications
  • ROGER Y. ANDERSON Department of Geology, the University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106 WALTER E
    ROGER Y. ANDERSON Department of Geology, The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106 WALTER E. DEAN, JR. Department of Geology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New Yor\ 13210 DOUGLAS W. KIRKLAND Mobil Research and Development Corporation, Dallas, Texas 75221 HENRY I. SNIDER Department of Physical Sciences, Eastern Connecticut State College, Willimantic, Connecticut 06226 Permian Castile Varved Evaporite Sequence, West Texas and New Mexico ABSTRACT is a change from thinner undisturbed anhy- drite laminae to thicker anhydrite laminae that Laminations in the Upper Permian evaporite generally show a secondary or penecontem- sequence in the Delaware Basin appear in the poraneous nodular character, with about 1,000 preevaporite phase of the uppermost Bell to 3,000 units between major oscillations or Canyon Formation as alternations of siltstone nodular beds. These nodular zones are correla- and organic layers. The laminations then change tive throughout the area of study and underly character and composition upward to organi- halite when it is present. The halite layers cally laminated claystone, organically laminated alternate with anhydrite laminae, are generally calcite, the calcite-laminated anhydrite typical recrystallized, and have an average thickness of the Castile Formation, and finally to the of about 3 cm. The halite beds were once west anhydrite-laminated halite of the Castile and of their present occurrence in the basin but Salado. were dissolved, leaving beds of anhydrite Laminae are correlative for distances up to breccia. The onset and cessation of halite depo- 113 km (70.2 mi) and probably throughout sition in the basin was nearly synchronous. most of the basin. Each lamina is synchronous, The Anhydrite I and II Members thicken and each couplet of two laminated components gradually across the basin from west to east, is interpreted as representing an annual layer of whereas the Halite I, II, and III Members are sedimentation—a varve.
    [Show full text]
  • DIAGENESIS of the BELL CANYON and CHERRY CANYON FORMATIONS (GUADALUPIAN), COYANOSA FIELD AREA, PECOS COUNTY, TEXAS by Katherine
    Diagenesis of the Bell Canyon and Cherry Canyon Formations (Guadalupian), Coyanosa field area, Pecos County, Texas Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Kanschat, Katherine Ann Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 28/09/2021 19:22:41 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/557840 DIAGENESIS OF THE BELL CANYON AND CHERRY CANYON FORMATIONS (GUADALUPIAN), COYANOSA FIELD AREA, PECOS COUNTY, TEXAS by Katherine Ann Kanschat A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF GEOSCIENCES In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 19 8 1 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable with­ out special permission, provided that accurate acknowledge­ ment of source is made. Requests for permission for ex­ tended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major de partment or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the proposed use of the material is in the inter­ ests of scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • Salt Caverns Studies
    SALT CAVERN STUDIES - REGIONAL MAP OF SALT THICKNESS IN THE MIDLAND BASIN FINAL CONTRACT REPORT Prepared by Susan Hovorka for U.S. Department of Energy under contract number DE-AF22-96BC14978 Bureau of Economic Geology Noel Tyler, Director The University of Texas at Austin Austin, Texas 78713-8924 February 1997 CONTENTS Executive Summmy ....................... ..... ...................................................................... ...................... 1 Introduction ..................................................... .. .............................................................................. 1 Purpose .......................................................................................... ..................................... ............. 2 Methods ........................................................................................ .. ........... ...................................... 2 Structural Setting and Depositional Environments ......................................................................... 6 Salt Thickness ............................................................................................................................... 11 Depth to Top of Salt ...................................................................................................................... 14 Distribution of Salt in the Seven Rivers, Queen, and Grayburg Formations ................................ 16 Areas of Salt Thinning .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Permian Basin, West Texas and Southeastern New Mexico
    Report of Investigations No. 201 Stratigraphic Analysis of the Upper Devonian Woodford Formation, Permian Basin, West Texas and Southeastern New Mexico John B. Comer* *Current address Indiana Geological Survey Bloomington, Indiana 47405 1991 Bureau of Economic Geology • W. L. Fisher, Director The University of Texas at Austin • Austin, Texas 78713-7508 Contents Abstract ..............................................................................................................................1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 Methods .............................................................................................................................3 Stratigraphy .....................................................................................................................5 Nomenclature ...................................................................................................................5 Age and Correlation ........................................................................................................6 Previous Work .................................................................................................................6 Western Outcrop Belt ......................................................................................................6 Central Texas ...................................................................................................................7 Northeastern Oklahoma
    [Show full text]
  • Speleogenesis and Delineation of Megaporosity and Karst
    Stephen F. Austin State University SFA ScholarWorks Electronic Theses and Dissertations 12-2016 Speleogenesis and Delineation of Megaporosity and Karst Geohazards Through Geologic Cave Mapping and LiDAR Analyses Associated with Infrastructure in Culberson County, Texas Jon T. Ehrhart Stephen F. Austin State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/etds Part of the Geology Commons, Hydrology Commons, and the Speleology Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Repository Citation Ehrhart, Jon T., "Speleogenesis and Delineation of Megaporosity and Karst Geohazards Through Geologic Cave Mapping and LiDAR Analyses Associated with Infrastructure in Culberson County, Texas" (2016). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 66. https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/etds/66 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Speleogenesis and Delineation of Megaporosity and Karst Geohazards Through Geologic Cave Mapping and LiDAR Analyses Associated with Infrastructure in Culberson County, Texas Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. This thesis is available at SFA ScholarWorks: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/etds/66 Speleogenesis and Delineation of Megaporosity and Karst Geohazards Through Geologic Cave Mapping and LiDAR Analyses Associated with Infrastructure in Culberson County, Texas By Jon Ehrhart, B.S. Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Stephen F. Austin State University In Partial Fulfillment Of the requirements For the Degree of Master of Science STEPHEN F.
    [Show full text]
  • Petroleum Exploration Plays and Resource Estimates, 1989, Onshore United States-­ Region 3, Colorado Plateau and Basin and Range
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Petroleum Exploration Plays and Resource Estimates, 1989, Onshore United States-­ Region 3, Colorado Plateau and Basin and Range By Richard B. Powers, Editor1 Open-File Report 93-248 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Denver, Colorado 1993 CONTENTS Introduction Richard B. Powers................................................................................................ 1 Commodities assessed.................................................................................................. 2 Areas of study.............................................................................................................. 2 Play discussion format................................................................................................. 5 Assessment procedures and methods........................................................................... 5 References cited........................................................................................................... 7 Glossary....................................................................................................................... 8 Region 3, Colorado Plateau and Basin and Range................................................................... 9 Geologic Framework
    [Show full text]
  • Salado Formation Followed
    GW -^SZ-i^ GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE YEAR(S): B. QUICK, Inc. 3340 Quail View Drive • Nashville, TN 37214 Phone: (615) 874-1077 • Fax: (615) 386-0110 Email: [email protected] November 12,2002 Mr Roger Anderson Environmental Bureau Chief New Mexico OCD 1220 S. ST. Francis Dr. 1 Santa Fe, NM 87507 Re: Class I Disposal Wells Dear Roger, I am still very interested in getting the disposal wells into salt caverns in Monument approved by OCD. It is my sincere belief that a Class I Disposal Well would be benefical to present and future industry in New Mexico. I suspect that one of my problems has been my distance from the property. I am hoping to find a local company or individuals who can be more on top of this project. In the past conditions have not justified the capital investment to permit, build and operate these wells and compete with surface disposal. Have there been any changes in OCD policy that might effect the permitting of these wells? If so, would you please send me any pretinent documents? Sincerely, Cc: Lori Wrotenbery i aoie or moments rage i uu Ctoraeferiz&MoiHi ©ff Bedded Satt fltoir Storage Caverns Case Stundy from the Midlamdl Basim Susan D. Hovorka Bureau of Economic Geology The University of Texas at Austin AUG1 0R9 9 Environmental Bureau Introduction to the Problem °" Conservation D/ws/on About solution-mined caverns l^Btg*** Geolojy_ofsalt Purpose, scope, and methods of our study Previous work: geologic setting of the bedded salt in the Permian Basin J^rV^W^' " Stratigraphic Units and Type Logs s Midland Basin stratigraphy
    [Show full text]
  • Ru Bidium-Strontium and Related Studies of the Salado Formation, Southeastern New Mexico
    CONTRACTOR REPORT SAND8 1-7072 PROPERTY OF GSA LIBRARY Unlimited.Release UC-70 Ru bidium-Strontium and Related Studies of the Salado Formation, Southeastern New Mexico Joseph K. Register University of New Mexico, Albuquerque Prepared by Sandia National Laboratones, Albuquerque. New Mexico 87185 and Livermore, Californ~a94550 for the United States Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC04-76DP00789 Printed October 198 1 Prepared for Sandia National Laboratories under Contract No. 13-9756 Issued by Sandia National Laboratories, operated for the United States Department of Energy by Sandia Corporation. NOTICE: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees nor any of theu contractors subcontractors or their employees makes any wanan'ty express or implied or assukes any legal lAbility or responsibdty for the accuracy cdmp~etenessorusefuiness of any information apparatus product or process disclosed or represent; that its use would not inhinie privatel; owned iights. Reference here& to any specific commercial product. process. or,service by trade name trademark manufacturer or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its enddrsement re'commendation' or favoring by the United States Government any agency thereof or hyof their contr;ctors or subcontractors. The views and opinion; expressed herein do not necessarily state ,or reflect those of the United States Government, any agency thereof or any of theu contractors or subcontractors. Printed in the United States of America Available from National Technical Information Servlce U. S. Department of Commerce 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield.
    [Show full text]
  • Oil and Gas Discovery Wells Drilled in New Mexico in 1981
    completedas oil producersand 448completed gas in as gasproducers for a successrate of 81.890. Oiland discoverywells drilled On the Bravodome in northeastNe* Mexico, 140 wells were completedas carbon-dioxide NewMexico in 1981 producers.In the SanJuan Basin ofnorthwest New Mexico, 1,379wells were completed; 218 byR. F. Broadhea4 PetroleumGeologist, New Mexico Bureauof Minesand Mineral Resources, of theseare oil wellsand 1,128are gas wells, Socorro,New Mexico calculatingto a successrate of 97.690.In the not-yet-productiveRaton Basin of Colfax Introduction completedin New Mexico in l98l; this setsa Countyand HaganBasin of SantaFe County, Drilling for oil and gas in New Mexico new recordfor completionsand surpassesthe wildcatsencountered promising shows of oil reacheda record high in 1981.Statistics ob- old record of 2,218 wells set in 1980.In the and gas from Cretaceousrocks. A record tainedfrom theNew MexicoOil Conservation Permian Basin of southeastNew Mexico, 14,076,000ft of well weredrilled in New Mex- Division indicatethat there were 2.867wells 1,348 wells were completedwith 655 wells ico in 1981, surpassingthe old record of I 1,278,000ft setin 1980.The averagedepth of wellsdrilled in l98l is 4,910ft, 175ft lessthan \ ,t8 Toos I theaverage depth of wellsdrilled in 1980. Rolon Fig. I showsthe locationsof the significant ao Mexico in 1981;table I Bosin wells drilled in New summarizesthe significantwildcat discoveries and table2 summarizesthe significantwildcat dry holes.For purposesof this paper,a sig- nificant wildcat discoveryis definedas a well in which commercialamounts of oil or gas I bonlo I from a formation have beendiscovered at a Fel distanceof more than 5 mi from the limits of n with Mrguel r previouslydiscovered fields commercial productionfrom that formation.A significant /) r wildcatdry hole is definedas a well drilled in '" Jt an unproductivebasil or part of a basinthat Acomo t, encounteredan encouragingshow of hydro- o Bosin carbonsbefore being abandoned.
    [Show full text]
  • Karst in Evaporites in Southeastern New Mexico*
    Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Compliance Certification Application Reference 27 Bachman, G. 0., 1987. Karst in Evaporites in Southeast~m New Mexico, SAND86-7078, Albuquerque, NM, Sandia National Laboratories. Submitted in accordance with 40 CPR §194.13, Submission of Reference Materials. ~I SAND86-7078 Distribution Unlimited Release Category UC-70 Printed September 1987 Karst in Evaporites in Southeastern New Mexico* SAND--86-7078 DE88 001315 George 0. Bachman, Consultant 4008 Hannett Avenue NE Albuquerque, NM 87110 Abstract Permian evaporites in southeastern New Mexico include gypsum, anhydrite, and salt, which are subject to both blanket and local, selective dissolution. Dissolution has produced many hundreds of individual karst features including collapse sinks, karst valleys, blind valleys, karst plains, caves, and breccia pipes. Dissolution began within some formations during Permian time and has been intermittent but continual ever since. Karst features other than blanket deposits of breccia are not preserved from the early episodes of dissolution, but some karst features preserved today-such as breccia pipes-are remnants of karst activity that was active at least as early as mid-Pleistocene time. Rainfall was much more abundant during Late Pleistocene time, and many features visible today may have been formed then. The drainage history of the Pecos River is related to extensive karstification of the Pecos Valley during mid-Pleistocene time. Large-scale stream piracy and dissolution of - salt in the subsurface resulted in major shifts and excavations in the channel. In spite of intensive groundwater studies that have been carried out in the region, major problems in groundwater in near-surface evaporite karst remain to be solved.
    [Show full text]
  • A Watershed Protection Plan for the Pecos River in Texas
    AA WWaatteerrsshheedd PPrrootteeccttiioonn PPll aann ffoorr tthhee PPeeccooss RRiivveerr iinn TTeexxaass October 2008 A Watershed Protection Plan for the Pecos River in Texas Funded By: Texas State Soil and Water Conservation Board (Project 04-11) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Investigating Agencies: Texas AgriLife Extension Service Texas AgriLife Research International Boundary and Water Commission, U.S. Section Texas Water Resources Institute Prepared by: Lucas Gregory, Texas Water Resources Institute and Will Hatler, Texas AgriLife Extension Service Funding for this project was provided through a Clean Water Act §319(h) Nonpoint Source Grant from the Texas State Soil and Water Conservation Board and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Acknowledgments The Investigating Agencies would like to take this opportunity to thank the many individuals who have contributed to the success of this project. The development of this watershed protection plan would not have been possible without the cooperation and consolidation of efforts from everyone involved. First, we would like to thank the many landowners and other interested parties who have attended project meetings, participated in surveys, and provided invaluable input that has guided the development of this document. Your interest in this project and the Pecos River was and will continue to be instrumental in ensuring the future restoration and improvement of the health of this important natural resource. While there are too many of you to name here, we hope that your interest, involvement, and willingness to implement needed management measures will grow as progress is made and new phases of the watershed protection plan are initiated. Our gratitude is extended to the following individuals who have contributed their support, technical expertise, time, and/or advice during the project: Greg Huber, J.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristics of the Boundary Between the Castile and Salado
    Gharacteristicsofthe boundary between the Castile and SaladoFormations near the western edge of the Delaware Basin, southeasternNew Mexico by BethM. Madsenand 1mer B. Raup,U.S. Geological Survey, Box 25046, MS-939, Denver, C0 80225 Abstract 1050 posited in the DelawareBasin of southeast New Mexico and west Texasduring Late Per- Permian The contact between the Upper mian (Ochoan)time. In early investigations Castile and Salado Formations throughout and SaladoFormations were un- the Delaware Basin, southeastNew Mexico /-a(run,ouo the Castile differentiated, and the two formations were and west Texas,has been difficult to define EDDY / aou^r" because of facies chanqes from the basin called Castile by Richardson (1904).Cart- center to the western idge. Petrographic wright (1930)divided the sequenceinto the studies of core from a Phillips Petroleum i .,/ upper and lower parts of the Castileon the Company well, drilled in the westernDela- -r---| ,' . NEW MEXTCO basisof lithology and arealdistribution. Lang ware Basin, indicate that there are maior (1935) the name "Saladohalite" Perotf,um introduced mineralogical and textural differences be- ,/ rot company "n for the upper part of the sequence,and he and Salado Formations. / core hole'NM 3170'1 tween the Castile the term Castile for the lower part The Castile is primarilv laminated anhv- retained of the drite with calciteand dolomite.The Salado ( of the sequence.Lang placed the base DELAWARE BASIN Formation is also primarily anhydrite at the SaladoFormation at the base of potassium location of this corehole, but with abundant (polyhalite) mineralization. This proved to layers of magnesite.This magnesiteindi- be an unreliable marker becausethe zone of catesan increaseof magnesiumenrichment mineralization occupies different strati- in the basin brines, which later resulted in graphic positions in different areas.
    [Show full text]