DOCSLIB.ORG

To: Liz Cullinan, Director of Building and Planning, Town of Hillsborough

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
To: Liz Cullinan, Director of Building and Planning, Town of Hillsborough 2635 NORTH FIRST STREET SAN JOSE, CA 95134 650.327.0429 WWW.MIGCOM.COM Memo To: Liz Cullinan, Director of Building and Planning, Town of Hillsborough Paul Willis, Public Works Director/City Engineer, Town of Hillsborough CC: Mark Hudak, Law Offices of Mark D. Hudak From: Chris Dugan Date: June 26, 2017 SUBJECT: Revised Final IS/MND and MMRP for the Cal Water MPS Station 6 Potable Water Tank Replacement Project This memo transmits the Revised Final Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), Initial Study (IS), and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP) for the Cal Water MPS Station 6 Potable Water Tank Replacement Project. The Revised Final IS/MND and MMRP reflect new information contained in a pre-demolition hazardous materials survey report prepared for the Town in June 20171. The new information results in minor changes to the contents and information of the IS/MND and MMRP prepared for the Cal Water project in 2016. The changes to the IS/MND include revisions to Mitigation Measure AIR-1 (pertaining to fugitive dust) but do not substantially change the findings of the IS/MND and as such do not require public re-circulation of the IS/MND. This memo has the following attachments: • Attachment 1: Revised Final MND • Attachment 2: Revised Final MMRP • Attachment 3: Revised Final IS • Attachment 4: Revised Final IS Appendix H (Hazardous Material Survey) For clarity, text changes to the original IS are shown only in Attachment 3, where deleted text is identified in strikethrough and new text is identified in underline format. ##CPD 1 Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon) 2017. Pre-Demolition Hazardous Materials Survey, Crystal Springs Reservoir, Station 6, Tank 1, Hillsborough, CA. June 13, 2017. Revised Final IS/MND and MMRP for the Cal Water MPS Station 6 Potable Water Tank Replacement Project This page intentionally left blank. MIG Memorandum June 26, 2017 Revised Final IS/MND and MMRP for the Cal Water MPS Station 6 Potable Water Tank Replacement Project Attachment 1 Revised Final Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the Cal Water MPS Station 6 Potable Water Tank Replacement Project June 26, 2017 MIG Memorandum June 26, 2017 Revised Final IS/MND and MMRP for the Cal Water MPS Station 6 Potable Water Tank Replacement Project This page intentionally left blank. MIG Memorandum June 26, 2017 Attachment 1: Revised Final MND for the Cal Water Page 1 MPS Station 6 Potable Water Tank Replacement Project Cal Water MPS Station 6 Potable Water Tank Replacement Project Revised Mitigated Negative Declaration Project: Cal Water MPS Station 6 Potable Water Tank Replacement Project Project Proponent / Lead Agency: Town of Hillsborough Availability of Documents: The Initial Study for this Mitigated Negative Declaration is available for review at: Town of Hillsborough 1600 Floribunda Ave Hillsborough, CA 94010 (650) 799-8466 Contact – Elizabeth Cullinan, AICP, Director of Building and Planning PROJECT DESCRIPTION The California Water Supply Company (Cal Water) is the largest investor-owned American water utility west of the Mississippi River and is the third largest in the country. In the San Francisco Bay Area, Cal Water’s Bayshore District serves the cities of San Carlos, San Mateo, and South San Francisco. One of the Bayshore District’s facilities, the Mid-Peninsula District (MPS) Station 6, is located in the Town of Hillsborough, in San Mateo County. The MPS Station 6 site does not have a physical address, but consists of an approximately 1.9-acre parcel of land (Assessor’s Parcel Number [APN] 032-395-220) on Crystal Springs Road. The MPS Station 6 site is centered on 37°33'23" North latitude and 122°20'10" West longitude, and generally surrounded by residential properties. The existing water storage facilities at Cal Water’s MPS Station 6 site include a pump station (with three active pumps), an underground, concrete potable water tank with capacity to store approximately 2.8 million gallons of water, and associated site improvements, such as site utilities and landscaping. The existing water tank is generally in poor condition and was removed from service in 2005. Cal Water is proposing to deconstruct and replace the existing underground water tank with a new underground water tank that would have the capacity to store approximately 3.05 million gallons of water. The new tank would increase storage capacity within the Bayshore District and improve the efficiency and reliability of the District’s water distribution system, especially during a seismic-related event. Cal Water would not modify the exterior of the existing pump station, but would add new exterior lighting. Cal Water would also make other minor site improvements to accommodate the tank replacement project, such as adding and/or replacing piping and utility lines, re-paving the site’s access driveway, and installing a new perimeter fence and gate. Cal Water proposes to begin construction in fall 2016 and have the new tank in-service by summer 2018. Cal Water estimates the project would result in the loss of up to 33 trees from the site (out of more than 300 trees on-site) and result in the off-hauling of approximately 7,670 cubic yards of concrete and soil. PROPOSED FINDINGS Town of Hillsborough has reviewed the attached Initial Study and determined that the Initial Study identifies potentially significant project effects, but: 1. Revisions to the project plans incorporated herein as mitigation would avoid or mitigate the effects to a point where no significant effects would occur; and 2. There is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the agency, that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15064(f)(3) and 15070(b), a Cal Water MPS Station 6 Potable Water Tank Replacement Project Town of Hillsborough Revised Final Mitigated Negative Declaration June 26, 2017 Attachment 1: Revised Final MND for the Cal Water Page 2 MPS Station 6 Potable Water Tank Replacement Project Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for consideration as the appropriate CEQA document for the project. BASIS OF FINDINGS Based on the environmental evaluation presented in the attached Initial Study, the project would not cause significant adverse effects related to aesthetics, agricultural and forestry resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and hazardous emissions, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, mineral resources, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation, and utilities/service systems. The project does not have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable. Design Features Cal Water has designed the proposed Cal Water MPS Station 6 Potable Water Tank Replacement Project to minimize potential impacts upon views and private property. Cal Water is proposing to replace the replace the existing underground tank with a new underground tank that is similar in size to the existing tank (less than 10 percent increase in storage capacity at the site). The underground tank design minimizes visual impacts to the homes around the MPS Station 6 site. Best Management Practices Cal Water has incorporated the following Best Management Practices into the planning, design, construction, operation and maintenance of its project to minimize the potential adverse effects of the project on the surrounding community and the environment. These Best Management Practices would be included in all construction bid requests, contracts, and documents, and are a part of the project and not mitigation measures. Best Management Practices Incorporated Into the Cal Water MPS Station 6 Potable Water Tank Replacement Project Hydrology and Due to the limited area of disturbance (approximately 0.9 acres), the Water Quality proposed project is not subject to the State Water Resources Control Board’s Construction General Permit and does not require the preparation of a formal Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan; however, the proposed project is subject to the Town’s municipal code requirements to prepare a grading plan and a sediment control plan. To reduce the potential for site erosion and off-site sedimentation, the Cal Water and/or its contractor shall, to the maximum extent feasible: 1) Schedule grading and excavation work during forecasted dry weather and stabilize all disturbed areas as soon as feasible, but at a minimum prior to any forecast rain event. 2) Protect storm drain inlets with fabric and gravel bags and cover or surrounding stockpiles of soil with fiber rolls to prevent soil from migrating offsite. Noise Cal Water shall incorporate the following construction noise best management practices into the project: 1) All work shall be subject to the noise threshold and time limitations of the Hillsborough Municipal Code and shall be performed within approved working hours between (8 AM to 5 PM Monday to Friday). Signs shall be posted at the entrance to the site and at construction equipment staging areas informing all workers and construction contractors of Hillsborough Municipal Code requirements. The sign shall also provide a contact name and phone number for the job site Cal Water MPS Station 6 Potable Water Tank Replacement Project Town of Hillsborough Revised Final Mitigated Negative Declaration June 26, 2017 Attachment 1: Revised Final MND for the Cal Water Page 3 MPS Station 6 Potable Water Tank Replacement Project Noise (con’t) and the Hillsborough Department of Public Works. 2) Adjacent residences shall be given at least five days advanced written notice of construction activity scheduling and hours of construction. 3) Stationary equipment such as compressors, generators, and welder machines shall be located as far away from surrounding residential land uses as possible. 4) Impact tools such as jack hammers shall be hydraulically or electrically powered wherever possible to avoided noise associated with compressed air exhaust from pneumatically powered tools. When use of pneumatic tools is unavoidable, it shall be ensured the tool will not exceed a decibel limit of 85dBA at a distance of 50 feet.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1180 Main Street Project, Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report, Redwood City, San Mateo County, California
    1180 Main Street Project, Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report, Redwood City, San Mateo County, California Prepared for: Premia Capital, LLC 801 Hamilton Street Redwood City, CA Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. January 18, 2019 1180 MAIN STREET PROJECT, CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY AND EVALUATION REPORT, REDWOOD CITY, SAN MATEO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA This document entitled 1180 Main Street Project, Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report, Redwood City, San Mateo County, California was prepared by Stantec Inc. (“Stantec”) for the account of Premia Capital, LLC (the “Client”). Any reliance on this document by any third party is strictly prohibited. The material in it reflects Stantec’s professional judgment in light of the scope, schedule and other limitations stated in the document and in the contract between Stantec and the Client. The opinions in the document are based on conditions and information existing at the time the document was published and do not take into account any subsequent changes. In preparing the document, Stantec did not verify information supplied to it by others. Any use which a third party makes of this document is the responsibility of such third party. Such third party agrees that Stantec shall not be responsible for costs or damages of any kind, if any, suffered by it or any other third party as a result of decisions made or actions taken based on this document. Prepared by (signature) Joanne Grant, Archaeologist, MA, RPA Reviewed by (signature) John A. Nadolski, M.A. Approved
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NPSForm 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties ow toi Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). e appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter l ill i " For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Folger Estate Stable Historic District_____________________ other names/site number Jones Ranch ________________________ 2. Location street & number 4040 Woodside Road___________ NA [H not for publication city or town Woodside_____________________ NAG vicinity state California_______ code CA county San Mateo. code 081_ zip code 94062 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this £3 nomination D request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property E3 meets D does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant D nationally n statewide 13 locally. ( Q See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Signature of certifying official/Title Date California Office of Historic Preservation State or Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property D meets Q does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • DATA SHEET UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER of HISTORIC PLACES Iiilllll INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM
    Form No. 10-300 (Rev. 10-74) DATA SHEET UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES iiilllll INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS ___________TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS______ | NAME HISTORIC AND/OR COMMON // kshworth-Remillard Home LOCATION STREET & NUMBER 755 Story Road —NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY, TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT San Jose —.VICINITY OF Tenth Congressional District STATE CODE COUNTY CODE California 06 Santa Clara County 085 HCLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE _ DISTRICT _ PUBLIC .^OCCUPIED _ AGRICULTURE —MUSEUM X.BUILDINGIS) X_PRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL —PARK —STRUCTURE _BOTH —WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL X.PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS —OBJECT _IN PROCESS -XYES: RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC —BEING CONSIDERED — YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION —NO —MILITARY —OTHER: IOWNER OF PROPERTY NAME Cabot. Cabot & Forbes_______ STREET & NUMBER #1 Maritime Plaza CITY, TOWN STATE San Francisco. VICINITY OF [LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE. REGISTRY OF DEEDS. ETC Santa Clara Co. Recorders Office, basement of County Courthouse STREET & NUMBER 191 N. 1st Street CITY. TOWN STATE San Jose, California REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS SanDATE Jose Visual~~~~ Inventory of Historic and Archeological Sites Sept. to Dec. 1973_________________ —FEDERAL —STATE -COUNTY -LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS (originai) city of San Jose Main Library, Calif. Rm., 180 W. San Carlos St CITY. TOWN ~~~~~~~~~~ STATE ___ San Jose, California DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE —EXCELLENT —.DETERIORATED —UNALTERED X.ORIGINALSITE X-GOOO —RUINS X-ALTERED —MOVED DATE. —FAIR —UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE This 1860s home is basically a Victorian farmhouse.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Suburbs of Last Resort: Landscape, Life, and Ruin on the Edges of San Francisco Bay Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6c87q28k Author Ekman, Peter Publication Date 2016 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Suburbs of Last Resort: Landscape, Life, and Ruin on the Edges of San Francisco Bay by Peter Sheldon Read Ekman A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geography in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Emeritus Paul Groth, Chair Associate Professor Jake Kosek Professor Louise Mozingo Fall 2016 Abstract Suburbs of Last Resort: Landscape, Life, and Ruin on the Edges of San Francisco Bay by Peter Sheldon Read Ekman Doctor of Philosophy in Geography University of California, Berkeley Professor Emeritus Paul Groth, Chair This study surveys the historical geography of suburban landscapes built and abandoned over the course of the United States’ long twentieth century. Diverse thinkers and actors, it shows, have understood the edges of the American metropolis to be laboratories of a sort, experimental sites where the forms of a reordered city might be glimpsed in microcosm and put on display. Suburbs have also served as laboratories where questions of landscape’s animacy — not what landscape means, the focus of a generation of scholarship in cultural geography, but what landscape does — came vividly to the fore, provoking much debate and speculation. Drawing on archival sources, visual materials, maps, plans, and field study of the built environment, this work recasts debates that have long been central to cultural geography, geographic thought, urban and suburban studies, and the intellectual histories of planning and urbanism.
    [Show full text]
  • Suburbs of Last Resort: Landscape, Life, and Ruin on the Edges of San Francisco Bay
    Suburbs of Last Resort: Landscape, Life, and Ruin on the Edges of San Francisco Bay by Peter Sheldon Read Ekman A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geography in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Emeritus Paul Groth, Chair Associate Professor Jake Kosek Professor Louise Mozingo Fall 2016 Abstract Suburbs of Last Resort: Landscape, Life, and Ruin on the Edges of San Francisco Bay by Peter Sheldon Read Ekman Doctor of Philosophy in Geography University of California, Berkeley Professor Emeritus Paul Groth, Chair This study surveys the historical geography of suburban landscapes built and abandoned over the course of the United States’ long twentieth century. Diverse thinkers and actors, it shows, have understood the edges of the American metropolis to be laboratories of a sort, experimental sites where the forms of a reordered city might be glimpsed in microcosm and put on display. Suburbs have also served as laboratories where questions of landscape’s animacy — not what landscape means, the focus of a generation of scholarship in cultural geography, but what landscape does — came vividly to the fore, provoking much debate and speculation. Drawing on archival sources, visual materials, maps, plans, and field study of the built environment, this work recasts debates that have long been central to cultural geography, geographic thought, urban and suburban studies, and the intellectual histories of planning and urbanism. It argues that both the modal techniques planners and builders came to prescribe for the post–World War II suburb and the most noticeable programs since predicated on redressing suburbia’s perceived failures can find their roots in prewar debates, ontological in character, on the “life” proper to landscape, indeed to matter itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Resources Study of Pullman National Monument, Illinois
    Michigan Technological University Digital Commons @ Michigan Tech Michigan Tech Publications 12-2019 Historic Resources Study of Pullman National Monument, Illinois Laura Walikainen Rouleau Michigan Technological University, [email protected] Sarah Fayen Scarlett Michigan Technological University, [email protected] Steven A. Walton Michigan Technological University, [email protected] Timothy Scarlett Michigan Technological University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/michigantech-p Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Other Anthropology Commons, Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Walikainen Rouleau, L., Scarlett, S. F., Walton, S. A., & Scarlett, T. (2019). Historic Resources Study of Pullman National Monument, Illinois. Report for the National Park Service. Retrieved from: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/michigantech-p/14692 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/michigantech-p Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Other Anthropology Commons, Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons, and the United States History Commons National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Midwest Archeological Center Lincoln, Nebraska Historic Resource Survey PULLMAN NATIONAL HISTORICAL MONUMENT Town of Pullman, Chicago, Illinois Dr. Laura Walikainen Rouleau Dr. Sarah Fayen Scarlett Dr. Steven A. Walton and Dr. Timothy J. Scarlett Michigan Technological University 31 December 2019 HISTORIC RESOURCE STUDY OF PULLMAN NATIONAL MONUMENT, Illinois Dr. Laura Walikainen Rouleau Dr. Sarah Fayen Scarlett Dr. Steven A. Walton and Dr. Timothy J. Scarlett Department of Social Sciences Michigan Technological University Houghton, MI 49931 Submitted to: Dr. Timothy M. Schilling Midwest Archeological Center, National Park Service 100 Centennial Mall North, Room 44 7 Lincoln, NE 68508 31 December 2019 Historic Resource Study of Pullman National Monument, Illinois by Laura Walikinen Rouleau Sarah F.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: Agency Coordination, Public Involvement, and List of Receiving Parties
    A Agency Coordination, Public Involvement, and List of Receiving Parties Appendix A: Agency Coordination, Public Involvement, and List of Receiving Parties Table of Contents A.1 Early Notification Announcement A-1 A.1.1 Early Notification Letter, December 4, 2012 ................................................................................ A-3 A.1.2 Legal Notice Publication, December 9, 2012 ............................................................................. A-13 A.1.3 Comments .................................................................................................................................. A-19 A.2 Project Information Meetings A-35 A.2.1 Project Meeting Notification Letters, August 27, 2013 ............................................................... A-37 A.2.2 Dates, Locations and Attendance .............................................................................................. A-57 A.2.3 Comments .................................................................................................................................. A-59 A.3 Section 106 Consultation A-65 A.3.1 Section 106 Consultation Letters, November 2013 ................................................................... A-67 A.3.2 Comments from the November 2013 Letters ........................................................................... A-107 A.3.3 Section 106 Consultation Letters, April 8, 2014 ....................................................................... A-115 A.3.4 Section 106 Concurrence Letters............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Phleger Estate
    PHLEGER ESTATE PHLEGER ESTATE n 1935, Herman and Mary Elena Phleger purchased their Mountain Meadow property that has come to be known as the Phleger Estate. In 1984, Herman died. IHe and Mary Elena had been life-long boosters of conservation and environmen- tal causes. In that spirit, Mary Elena offered the Peninsula Open Space Trust (POST) the opportunity to preserve the property. Within four years, POST managed to raise the necessary funding to make the purchase possible. On April 29, 1995, the Phleger Estate was dedicated as a part of the GGNRA. The 1,084 acre parcel1 is located west of Cañada Road and north of San Mateo Coun- ty’s Huddart Park in the southern hill country of the Peninsula, once a portion of Ran- cho Cañada de Raymundo in the heart of a robust logging industry during the nine- teenth century. Its western boundary is a forested ridge plainly visible from United States Interstate 280 to the east. This ridge and slope is the eastern portion of Kings Mountain of the Sierra Morena or Santa Cruz Range of Mountains (also referred to as the Skyline) and at 2,315 feet is the second highest point in San Mateo County.2 Three major drainages run from the Mountain into West Union Creek. The Phleger Estate includes redwoods, mixed evergreens and tan oak woodlands. The redwoods are mostly in stream corridors of canyons of the Skyline and also along West Union Creek. These trees include mostly second-growth redwoods, however, the lumberjacks did not take every one of the original sequoias, because a few old growth trees, obviously the more inaccessible ones, live in the upper portions of the property.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment 1
    ALMA COLLEGE HISTORIC RESOURCE STUDY Revised Draft – Subject to Revision BEAR CREEK ROAD LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA Page & Turnbull, Inc. San Francisco, California November 2005 Cover Photograph: Postcard, Alma College Entry Gate, Jesuit Era (1934-1969), n.d. (Western Archives of the Society of Jesus). Historic Resource Study Alma College Revised Draft – Subject to Revision Los Gatos, California TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 3 II. RESEARCH AND INFORMATION 4 A. Sources Examined B. Potential Sources for Additional Historic Study III. HISTORY OF ALMA COLLEGE 4 A. Early History of the Site B. Flood Era (1894-1906) C. Tevis Era (1906-1934) D. Jesuit Era (1934-1969) IV. DESCRIPTION OF ALMA COLLEGE 16 A. Site B. Chapel (1909) C. Library (1934) D. Classroom Building (1935) E. Main House Remnant (1909-1920) F. Lily Pond (1912), Pergola and Roman Plunge (1915) G. Central Fountain (1909-1931) H. Garage (1934-1989) I. Shrine of St. Joseph (1934-1969) J. Retaining Walls (1894-1969) K. Miscellaneous Structures V. CALIFORNIA REGISTER CRITERIA 28 A. Significance B. Integrity C. Historic Districts D. Potential Cultural Landscape November 2005 Page & Turnbull, Inc. -1- Historic Resource Study Alma College Revised Draft – Subject to Revision Los Gatos, California VI. EVALUATION OF HISTORIC STATUS 30 A. Previous Studies B. Significance C. Integrity D. Determination of Eligibility E. Potential Cultural Landscape F. Physical Conditions VII. HISTORIC PRESERVATION REGULATORY FRAMEWORK 37 A. Santa Clara County General Plan and Ordinance B. California Environmental Quality Act C. National Historic Preservation Act D. Application VIII. RECOMMENDED TREATMENT OF ALMA COLLEGE 41 To Be Developed Later XI. CONCLUSION 41 To Be Developed Later X.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdfcounty of San Mateo General Plan
    General Plan November 1986 Overview Background & Issues (Chapters 1-16) Environmental Services Agency Planning and Building Division ■ San Mateo County ■ California General Plan As approved by the Board of Supervisors November 18, 1986 Department of Environmental Management Planning and Building Division ■ San Mateo County ■ California Publisher’s Note: This comprehensive edition of the General Plan is divided into two parts: Part 1 & Part 2. Each part is contained in a separate binder. Part 1 consists of: Overview Background and Issues (Chapters 1-10) Part 2 consists of: Background and Issues (Chapters 11-16) Policies Maps Table of Contents General Plan (Part 1) Page PREFACE GENERAL PLAN GOALS........................................................XXV Overview GENERAL PLAN FUNCTION AND ORGANIZATION......................................1 I. LEGAL REQUIREMENTS FOR GENERAL PLAN CONTENTS..........................1 II. PURPOSE OF UPDATING THE GENERAL PLAN..................................4 III. ORGANIZATION AND CONTENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN..........................9 IV. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION.................................................12 V. REVISING AND AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN...............................13 PHYSICAL SETTING...........................................................14 I. TOPOGRAPHY...........................................................14 II. CLIMATE..............................................................14 III. PATTERN OF DEVELOPMENT...............................................15 POLITICAL SETTING..........................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: Agency Coordination, Public Involvement, and List of Receiving Parties
    Appendix A: Agency Coordination, Public Involvement, and List of Receiving Parties Appendix A: Agency Coordination, Public Involvement, and List of Receiving Parties Table of Contents A.1 Early Notification Announcement ...................................................................................... A-1 A.1.1 Early Notification Letter, December 4, 2012 .......................................................................... A-3 A.1.2 Legal Notice Publication, December 9, 2012 ....................................................................... A-13 A.1.3 Comments from the Early Notification Announcement ........................................................ A-19 A.2 Project Meetings ................................................................................................................ A-35 A.2.1 Project Meeting Notification Letters, August 27, 2013 ......................................................... A-37 A.2.2 Project Meeting Sign-In Sheets, September 2013 ............................................................... A-59 A.2.3 Comments from the Project Meeting ................................................................................... A-65 A.3 Section 106 Consultation .................................................................................................. A-71 A.3.1 Section 106 Consultation Letter, November 21, 2013 ......................................................... A-73 A.3.2 Comments from the Section 106 Consultation Letter .......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download This
    Form No 10-301a (Rev. 10-74) DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES FOR NFS USE ONLY NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES RECEIVED AUG 1 8 1975 PROPERTY PHOTOGRAPH FORM SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS __________TYPE ALL ENTRIES -lENCLOSE WITH PHOTOGRAPH NAME HISTORIC The Carolands AND/OR COMMON Chateau LOCATION CITY. TOWN -VICINITY OF COUNTY STATE Hlllsborough San Mateo California PHOTO REFERENCE PHOTO CREDIT The Boutique DATE OF PHOTO Unknown NEGATIVE FILED AT Boutique of f ice , 1001 California Dr., Burling ame, Calif. IDENTIFICATION DESCRIBE VIEW. DIRECTION. ETC. IF DISTRICT. GIVE BUILDING NAME & STREET PHOTO NO. 1 ,--/ South elevation of The Chateau, the main entrance, INT: 2883-75 Form No 10-301 a (Rev. 10-74) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE RECEIVED AUG NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES IB 1975 PROPERTY PHOTOGRAPH FORM PATE ENTERED SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS __________TYPE ALL ENTRIES -JENCLOSE WITH PHOTOGRAPH____ NAME HISTORIC The Carolands AND/OR COMMON The Chateau Q LOCATION CITY. TOWN ___VICINITY OF COUNTY STATE Hillsborough San Mateo California PHOTO REFERENCE PHOTO CREDIT College of San Mateo DATE OF PHOTO Unknown NEGATIVE FILED AT College of San Mateo IDENTIFICATION DESCRIBE VIEW, DIRECTION. ETC. IF DISTRICT. GIVE BUILDING NAME & STREET PHOTO NO. Western elevation from a north angle. INT: 2883-79 X Form No 10-301a (Rev. 10-74) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FOR NPS USE ONLY NATIONAL PARK SERVICE AUG 1 8 1975 NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES RECEIVED PROPERTY PHOTOGRAPH FORM DATE ENTERED 3CT 2 1 SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS TYPE ALL ENTRIES -lENCLOSE WITH PHOTOGRAPH ____ NAME HISTORIC The Carolands AND/OR COMMON The Chateau LOCATION STATE CITY.
    [Show full text]