DOCSLIB.ORG

Pdfcounty of San Mateo General Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pdfcounty of San Mateo General Plan General Plan November 1986 Overview Background & Issues (Chapters 1-16) Environmental Services Agency Planning and Building Division ■ San Mateo County ■ California General Plan As approved by the Board of Supervisors November 18, 1986 Department of Environmental Management Planning and Building Division ■ San Mateo County ■ California Publisher’s Note: This comprehensive edition of the General Plan is divided into two parts: Part 1 & Part 2. Each part is contained in a separate binder. Part 1 consists of: Overview Background and Issues (Chapters 1-10) Part 2 consists of: Background and Issues (Chapters 11-16) Policies Maps Table of Contents General Plan (Part 1) Page PREFACE GENERAL PLAN GOALS........................................................XXV Overview GENERAL PLAN FUNCTION AND ORGANIZATION......................................1 I. LEGAL REQUIREMENTS FOR GENERAL PLAN CONTENTS..........................1 II. PURPOSE OF UPDATING THE GENERAL PLAN..................................4 III. ORGANIZATION AND CONTENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN..........................9 IV. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION.................................................12 V. REVISING AND AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN...............................13 PHYSICAL SETTING...........................................................14 I. TOPOGRAPHY...........................................................14 II. CLIMATE..............................................................14 III. PATTERN OF DEVELOPMENT...............................................15 POLITICAL SETTING..........................................................17 I. POLITICAL HISTORY OF UNINCORPORATED AREAS............................17 II. PLANNING FOR UNINCORPORATED AREAS....................................18 SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC SETTING................................................23 I. REGIONAL GROWTH AND CHANGE: THE COUNTY'S ROLE.......................23 II. COUNTY POPULATION GROWTH AND COMPOSITION.............................27 III. COUNTY EMPLOYMENT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT...........................37 APPENDIX...................................................................1A Background & Issues CHAPTER 1: VEGETATIVE, WATER, FISH AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES BACKGROUND................................................................1.1 I. INTRODUCTION........................................................1.1 II. EXISTING VEGETATIVE, WATER, FISH AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES.............1.2 III. EXISTING PLANS, POLICIES AND REGULATIONS AFFECTING VEGETATIVE, WATER, FISH AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES.................................1.22 i Page ISSUES...................................................................1.41 I. IMPORTANCE OF THE RESOURCES........................................1.41 II. OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS OF PROTECTING VEGETATIVE, WATER, FISH AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES........................................1.41 III. EVALUATION OF EXISTING PLANS, POLICIES AND REGULATIONS AFFECTING VEGETATIVE, WATER, FISH AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES.....................1.45 IV. ALTERNATIVES.......................................................1.49 APPENDICES...............................................................1.1A CHAPTER 2: SOIL RESOURCES BACKGROUND................................................................2.1 I. INTRODUCTION........................................................2.1 II. EXISTING SOIL RESOURCES.............................................2.4 III. EXISTING PLANS, POLICIES AND REGULATIONS AFFECTING SOIL RESOURCES..........................................................2.12 ISSUES...................................................................2.31 I. IMPORTANCE OF SOIL RESOURCES.......................................2.31 II. OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS AFFECTING SOIL RESOURCE PROTECTION.........................................................2.31 III. EVALUATION OF EXISTING PLANS, POLICIES AND REGULATIONS AFFECTING SOIL RESOURCES...........................................2.36 IV. ALTERNATIVES TO PROTECT SOIL RESOURCES.............................2.39 APPENDICES...............................................................2.1A CHAPTER 3: MINERAL RESOURCES BACKGROUND................................................................3.1 I. INTRODUCTION........................................................3.1 II. EXISTING MINERAL RESOURCES..........................................3.3 III. EXISTING PLANS, POLICIES AND REGULATIONS AFFECTING MINERAL RESOURCES..........................................................3.16 ISSUES...................................................................3.22 I. IMPORTANCE OF MINERAL RESOURCES....................................3.22 II. OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS ON UTILIZATION.......................3.22 III. EVALUATION OF EXISTING PLANS, POLICIES AND REGULATIONS AFFECTING MINERAL RESOURCES........................................3.26 IV. ALTERNATIVES.......................................................3.28 APPENDICES...............................................................3.1A ii Page CHAPTER 4: VISUAL QUALITY BACKGROUND................................................................4.1 I. INTRODUCTION........................................................4.1 II. EXISTING VISUAL QUALITY.............................................4.2 III. EXISTING PLANS, POLICIES, AND REGULATIONS AFFECTING VISUAL QUALITY.....................................................4.17 ISSUES...................................................................4.33 I. IMPORTANCE OF PRESERVING VISUAL QUALITY............................4.33 II. OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS AFFECTING VISUAL QUALITY.............4.34 III. EVALUATION OF EXISTING PLANS, POLICIES AND REGULATIONS AFFECTING VISUAL QUALITY...........................................4.40 IV. ALTERNATIVES.......................................................4.48 APPENDICES...............................................................4.1A CHAPTER 5: HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES BACKGROUND................................................................5.1 I. INTRODUCTION........................................................5.1 II. EXISTING HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES....................5.3 III. EXISTING PLANS, POLICIES AND REGULATIONS AFFECTING HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES........................................5.5 ISSUES...................................................................5.11 I. IMPORTANCE OF HISTORICAL PRESERVATION..............................5.11 II. OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS AFFECTING HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES...........................................5.12 III. EVALUATION OF EXISTING PLANS, POLICIES AND REGULATIONS AFFECTING HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES..................5.15 IV. ALTERNATIVE PRESERVATION TECHNIQUES................................5.18 APPENDICES...............................................................5.1A CHAPTER 6: PARK AND RECREATION RESOURCES BACKGROUND I. INTRODUCTION........................................................6.1 II. EXISTING PARK AND RECREATION RESOURCES..............................6.3 III. EXISTING PLANS, POLICIES AND REGULATIONS AFFECTING PARK AND RECREATION RESOURCES...............................................6.14 iii Page ISSUES...................................................................6.25 I. IMPORTANCE OF RECREATION...........................................6.25 II. OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS AFFECTING PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES.........................................................6.25 III. EVALUATION OF EXISTING PLANS, POLICIES AND REGULATIONS AFFECTING PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES...........................6.29 IV. ALTERNATIVES.......................................................6.32 APPENDICES...............................................................6.1A CHAPTER 7: GENERAL LAND USE BACKGROUND................................................................7.1 I. INTRODUCTION........................................................7.1 II. EXISTING LAND USE...................................................7.3 III. EXISTING PLANS, POLICIES AND REGULATIONS AFFECTING GENERAL LAND USE....................................................7.9 ISSUES...................................................................7.14 I. ADEQUACY OF AVAILABLE LAND TO MEET DEMAND FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT......7.14 II. OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS TO CONSIDER FOR GENERAL LAND USE PLANNING.......................................................7.14 III. EVALUATION OF EXISTING PLANS, POLICIES AND REGULATIONS AFFECTING GENERAL PLAN USE.........................................7.20 IV. ALTERNATIVES.......................................................7.22 CHAPTER 8: URBAN LAND USE BACKGROUND................................................................8.1 I. INTRODUCTION........................................................8.1 II. INVENTORY OF EXISTING URBAN LAND USE................................8.2 III. EXISTING PLANS, POLICIES AND REGULATIONS AFFECTING URBAN LAND USE...........................................................8.21 ISSUES...................................................................8.28 I. ADEQUACY OF AVAILABLE LAND TO MEET DEMAND FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT IN URBAN AREAS.....................................................8.28 II. OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS TO CONSIDER FOR URBAN LAND USE PLANNING.......................................................8.28 III. EVALUATION OF EXISTING PLANS, POLICIES AND REGULATIONS AFFECTING URBAN LAND USE...........................................8.37
Load more

  1037
Copy Link
Recommended publications
  • Lower Crystal Springs Dam Improvements and Skyline Bridge Replacement Projects
    Lower Crystal Springs Dam Improvements and Skyline Bridge Replacement Projects Highlights, Timelines & FAQs In 2018, work was competed on several interconnected efforts by the County of San Mateo and the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) to make improvements to the Lower Crystal Springs Dam and replaced the bridge on top of the dam, which allows the re-opening of Skyline Boulevard. Below are some key facts: Lower Crystal Springs Dam Improvement Highlights (SFPUC Project): • Doubling the width of the spillway to 200 feet • Raising the parapet wall on top of the dam by 9 feet • Replacing the stilling basin (which stills released water before it enters San Mateo Creek) with a new larger basin and erosion protection at the toe of the dam • $35 million total project cost, over two years (completed December 2012) Skyline Bridge Replacement Highlights (County of San Mateo project): • The new bridge is 626 feet long and 51.5 feet wide and approximately 7 feet higher than the former bridge. • Constructing retaining walls at the Scenic Vista Point parking area due to the change in bridge elevation. • Created a new 15-foot wide recreational trail on the west side of the bridge that is separated from vehicular traffic and providing connectivity for Crystal Springs Regional Trail users. • Installed new split rail fencing. • A new trail section south of the bridge allows trail users to continue along the Crystal Springs Regional Trail to the relatively new “South of Dam” trail section. • PG&E relocated overhead 230kV electrical transmission lines to the underside of the new bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction San Andreas Fault: an Overview
    Introduction This volume is a general geology field guide to the San Andreas Fault in the San Francisco Bay Area. The first section provides a brief overview of the San Andreas Fault in context to regional California geology, the Bay Area, and earthquake history with emphasis of the section of the fault that ruptured in the Great San Francisco Earthquake of 1906. This first section also contains information useful for discussion and making field observations associated with fault- related landforms, landslides and mass-wasting features, and the plant ecology in the study region. The second section contains field trips and recommended hikes on public lands in the Santa Cruz Mountains, along the San Mateo Coast, and at Point Reyes National Seashore. These trips provide access to the San Andreas Fault and associated faults, and to significant rock exposures and landforms in the vicinity. Note that more stops are provided in each of the sections than might be possible to visit in a day. The extra material is intended to provide optional choices to visit in a region with a wealth of natural resources, and to support discussions and provide information about additional field exploration in the Santa Cruz Mountains region. An early version of the guidebook was used in conjunction with the Pacific SEPM 2004 Fall Field Trip. Selected references provide a more technical and exhaustive overview of the fault system and geology in this field area; for instance, see USGS Professional Paper 1550-E (Wells, 2004). San Andreas Fault: An Overview The catastrophe caused by the 1906 earthquake in the San Francisco region started the study of earthquakes and California geology in earnest.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioassessment and Water Quality Monitoring in the San Mateo Creek Watershed San Mateo County, California
    Bioassessment and Water Quality Monitoring in the San Mateo Creek Watershed San Mateo County, California San Mateo Countywide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program August 2005 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Bioassessment and Water Quality Monitoring in the San Mateo Creek Watershed San Mateo County, California San Mateo Countywide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program Prepared for the San Mateo Countywide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program by EOA, Inc. 1410 Jackson St. Oakland, CA 94612 August 2005 This Page Intentionally Left Blank TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY..................................................................................................................................... i 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................1 2.0 BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................1 2.1 Description of Study Area ...................................................................................................1 2.2 Regulatory Information........................................................................................................1 2.3 Previous Water Quality Investigations ................................................................................2 3.0 METHODS ..............................................................................................................................2 3.1 Bioassessment....................................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Doggin' America's Beaches
    Doggin’ America’s Beaches A Traveler’s Guide To Dog-Friendly Beaches - (and those that aren’t) Doug Gelbert illustrations by Andrew Chesworth Cruden Bay Books There is always something for an active dog to look forward to at the beach... DOGGIN’ AMERICA’S BEACHES Copyright 2007 by Cruden Bay Books All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without permission in writing from the Publisher. Cruden Bay Books PO Box 467 Montchanin, DE 19710 www.hikewithyourdog.com International Standard Book Number 978-0-9797074-4-5 “Dogs are our link to paradise...to sit with a dog on a hillside on a glorious afternoon is to be back in Eden, where doing nothing was not boring - it was peace.” - Milan Kundera Ahead On The Trail Your Dog On The Atlantic Ocean Beaches 7 Your Dog On The Gulf Of Mexico Beaches 6 Your Dog On The Pacific Ocean Beaches 7 Your Dog On The Great Lakes Beaches 0 Also... Tips For Taking Your Dog To The Beach 6 Doggin’ The Chesapeake Bay 4 Introduction It is hard to imagine any place a dog is happier than at a beach. Whether running around on the sand, jumping in the water or just lying in the sun, every dog deserves a day at the beach. But all too often dog owners stopping at a sandy stretch of beach are met with signs designed to make hearts - human and canine alike - droop: NO DOGS ON BEACH.
    [Show full text]
  • Beach Report Card Program Is Funded by Grants From
    2013-2014 Annual 2013–2014 Heal the Bay is a nonprofit environmental organization making Southern California coastal waters and watersheds, including Santa Monica Bay, safe, healthy and clean. We use science, education, community action and advocacy to pursue our mission. The Beach Report Card program is funded by grants from Swain Barber Foundation ©2014 Heal the Bay. All Rights Reserved. The fishbones logo is a trademark of Heal the Bay. The Beach Report Card is a service mark of Heal the Bay. We at Heal the Bay believe the public has the right to know the water quality at their favorite beaches. We are proud to provide West Coast residents and visitors with this information in an easy-to-understand format. We hope beachgoers will use this information to make the decisions necessary to protect their health. This page: Avalon Bay, Catalina Island Cover photo: The Wedge, Newport Beach TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION ONE Introduction Executive Summary 6 SECTION TWO The Beach Report Card County by County Summary Reports 16 SECTION THREE BRC Impacts and News California Beach Types and Water Quality 48 The Clean Beach Initiative (CBI) 50 Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) 53 Major Beach News 55 Recommendations for the Coming Year 65 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) 70 SECTION FOUR Appendices Methodology for California 76 Methodology for Oregon and Washington 78 2013-2014 Honor Roll 80 Grades by County – California 81 Grades by County – Washington 94 Grades by County – Oregon 97 Index and Glossary 98 Acknowledgements 100 5 Executive Summary Beaches in the U.S. accommodate nearly two billion beach visits each year1 and provide enormous economic benefits to their communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Portola Valley School District County of San Mateo Portola Valley, California
    PORTOLA VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SAN MATEO PORTOLA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA AUDIT REPORT JUNE 30, 2018 CHAVAN & ASSOCIATES, LLP CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 1475 SARATOGA AVE., SUITE 180 SAN JOSE, CA 95129 PORTOLA VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT SAN MATEO COUNTY TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE FINANCIAL SECTION: Independent Auditor’s Report ......................................................................................... 1 Management’s Discussion and Analysis......................................................................... 5 Basic Financial Statements: Government-Wide Financial Statements: Statement of Net Position ................................................................................... 15 Statement of Activities ....................................................................................... 16 Fund Financial Statements: Balance Sheet - Governmental Funds ................................................................ 17 Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds Balance Sheet to the Statement of Net Position ............................................................................. 18 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances - Governmental Funds ..................................................... 19 Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities ............................................................ 20 Statement of Fiduciary Net Position - Fiduciary Funds ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1180 Main Street Project, Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report, Redwood City, San Mateo County, California
    1180 Main Street Project, Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report, Redwood City, San Mateo County, California Prepared for: Premia Capital, LLC 801 Hamilton Street Redwood City, CA Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. January 18, 2019 1180 MAIN STREET PROJECT, CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY AND EVALUATION REPORT, REDWOOD CITY, SAN MATEO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA This document entitled 1180 Main Street Project, Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report, Redwood City, San Mateo County, California was prepared by Stantec Inc. (“Stantec”) for the account of Premia Capital, LLC (the “Client”). Any reliance on this document by any third party is strictly prohibited. The material in it reflects Stantec’s professional judgment in light of the scope, schedule and other limitations stated in the document and in the contract between Stantec and the Client. The opinions in the document are based on conditions and information existing at the time the document was published and do not take into account any subsequent changes. In preparing the document, Stantec did not verify information supplied to it by others. Any use which a third party makes of this document is the responsibility of such third party. Such third party agrees that Stantec shall not be responsible for costs or damages of any kind, if any, suffered by it or any other third party as a result of decisions made or actions taken based on this document. Prepared by (signature) Joanne Grant, Archaeologist, MA, RPA Reviewed by (signature) John A. Nadolski, M.A. Approved
    [Show full text]
  • Podcast Show Notes & Transcript
    SHOW NOTES & TRANSCRIPT EPISODE SHOW NOTES Episode Title: Crystal Springs Dam Episode # & Date: Episode #24 – April 9, 2020 About this Episode: Peter uncovers the history of San Mateo’s great drinking water and the impressive Crystal Springs Dam that makes it possible. Episode Web Page: https://sanmateofocus.com/crystal-springs-dam/ EPISODE TRANSCRIPT This is San Mateo Focus, I’m Peter Radsliff filling in this week for Judy Gordon. When choosing what to present for this episode, it wasn’t lost on Judy and I how surreal life is right now and whether talking about local topics even made a difference in a San Mateo that is locked- down. But maybe because of this lack of normalcy, it’s all the more important to ensure we have some semblance of routine in our lives. It’s with that in mind that we offer ongoing stories of San Mateo’s history, culture, food, and things to do. Onto this week’s episode. When San Mateans hear the words Hetch Hetchy, most know it’s the name of a valley in Yosemite National Park about a four-hour drive away. Some might also know it’s the site of the impressive 431- foot tall O’Shaughnessy Dam that forms the Hetch Hetchy reservoir, which feeds the 160-mile long journey to Upper Crystal Springs Reservoir for us San Mateans to drink. What most probably don’t know is that the Lower Crystal Springs reservoir first existed because of the 141-foot tall Crystal Springs Dam that was built over San Mateo Creek in 1888, a full 35 years before O’Shaughnessy Dam opened in Hetch Hetchy! In this episode we’re going to explore the history of the Crystal Springs Dam and how vital it is to the lifestyle, economy, and safety of San Mateo.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NPSForm 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties ow toi Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). e appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter l ill i " For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Folger Estate Stable Historic District_____________________ other names/site number Jones Ranch ________________________ 2. Location street & number 4040 Woodside Road___________ NA [H not for publication city or town Woodside_____________________ NAG vicinity state California_______ code CA county San Mateo. code 081_ zip code 94062 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this £3 nomination D request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property E3 meets D does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant D nationally n statewide 13 locally. ( Q See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Signature of certifying official/Title Date California Office of Historic Preservation State or Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property D meets Q does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • San Mateo County
    Steelhead/rainbow trout resources of San Mateo County San Pedro San Pedro Creek flows northwesterly, entering the Pacific Ocean at Pacifica State Beach. It drains a watershed about eight square miles in area. The upper portions of the drainage contain springs (feeding the south and middle forks) that produce perennial flow in the creek. Documents with information regarding steelhead in the San Pedro Creek watershed may refer to the North Fork San Pedro Creek and the Sanchez Fork. For purposes of this report, these tributaries are considered as part of the mainstem. A 1912 letter regarding San Mateo County streams indicates that San Pedro Creek was stocked. A fishway also is noted on the creek (Smith 1912). Titus et al. (in prep.) note DFG records of steelhead spawning in the creek in 1941. In 1968, DFG staff estimated that the San Pedro Creek steelhead run consisted of 100 individuals (Wood 1968). A 1973 stream survey report notes, “Spawning habitat is a limiting factor for steelhead” (DFG 1973a, p. 2). The report called the steelhead resources of San Pedro Creek “viable and important” but cited passage at culverts, summer water diversion, and urbanization effects on the stream channel and watershed hydrology as placing “the long-term survival of the steelhead resource in question”(DFG 1973a, p. 5). The lower portions of San Pedro Creek were surveyed during the spring and summer of 1989. Three O. mykiss year classes were observed during the study throughout the lower creek. Researchers noticed “a marked exodus from the lower creek during the late summer” of yearling and age 2+ individuals, many of which showed “typical smolt characteristics” (Sullivan 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • USGS Professional Paper 1740
    Age, Stratigraphy, and Correlations of the Late Neogene Purisima Formation, Central California Coast Ranges By Charles L. Powell II1, John A. Barron1, Andrei M. Sarna-Wojcicki1, Joseph C. Clark2, Frank A. Perry3, Earl E. Brabb4, and Robert J. Fleck1 Abstract Counties inland to the San Andreas Fault (fig. 1). These scat- tered outcrops have been grouped as the Purisima Formation The Purisima Formation is an important upper Miocene because they are all fine- to coarse-grained clastic rocks, with and Pliocene stratigraphic unit in central California, cropping dark andesitic fragments and locally abundant silicic tephra, out from the coast at Point Reyes north of San Francisco to and occupy the same stratigraphic position at their various more extensive exposures in the Santa Cruz Mountains to the exposures. Since first described by Haehl and Arnold (1904), south. The fine-grained rocks in the lower parts of the Puri- the Purisima Formation has been considered to be of Pliocene sima Formation record a latest Miocene transgressive event, or of late Miocene to Pliocene age. Differing age assignments whereas the middle and upper parts of the formation consist have resulted from the wide stratigraphic range of many com- of increasingly clastic-rich siltstones and sandstones resulting monly encountered megafossils and from the lack of agree- from uplift of adjacent coastal regions and the Sierra Nevada ment on the placement of the Miocene-Pliocene Series bound- during Pliocene transgressive and regressive sea-level events. ary between the provincial megafaunal chronology and that Exposures of the Purisima occur in three different, fault- of international usage.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohlone-Portola Heritage Trail Statement of Significance
    State of California Natural Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # Trinomial CONTINUATION SHEET Property Name: __California Historical Landmarks Associated with the Ohlone-Portolá Heritage Trail______ Page __1___ of __36__ B10. Statement of Significance (continued): The following Statement of Significance establishes the common historic context for California Historical Landmarks associated with the October-November 1769 expedition of Gaspar de Portolá through what is now San Mateo County, as part of a larger expedition through the southern San Francisco Bay region, encountering different Ohlone communities, known as the Ohlone-Portolá Heritage Trail. This context establishes the significance of these landmark sites as California Historical Landmarks for their association with an individual having a profound influence on the history of California, Gaspar de Portolá, and a group having a profound influence on the history of California, the Ohlone people, both associated with the Portolá Expedition Camp at Expedition. This context amends seven California Historical Landmarks, and creates two new California Historical Landmark nominations. The Statement of Significance applies to the following California Historical Landmarks, updating their names and historic contexts. Each meets the requirements of California PRC 5024.1(2) regarding review of state historical landmarks preceding #770, and the criteria necessary for listing as California Historical Landmarks. Because these landmarks indicate sites with no extant
    [Show full text]