Literary Copyright Reform in Early Victorian England: the Framing of the 1842 Copyright Act

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Literary Copyright Reform in Early Victorian England: the Framing of the 1842 Copyright Act LITERARY COPYRIGHT REFORM IN EARLY VICTORIAN ENGLAND: THE FRAMING OF THE 1842 COPYRIGHT ACT CATHERINE SEVILLE Cambridge University Press LITERARY COPYRIGHT REFORM IN EARLY VICTORIAN ENGLAND The Framing of the 1842 Copyright Act Talfourd's ®rst copyright bill was presented in 1837, and the public and parliamentary controversy it provoked is re¯ected in contemporary pamphlets, correspondence and hundreds of petitions presented to parlia- ment, as well as in the changing aims of the bill itself. In addition to the expected debate as to the nature of literary property and the economic effects on the publishing trade, discussion of copyright law raised broader questions: the relative values of literature and science, the importance of public education, the dangers of monopolies and the nature of public interest. In a period of social, political and technological upheaval, these were incendiary matters. Talfourd audaciously demanded not only a considerable extension of copyright term, but also international protec- tion. This book explores and sets in context the making of this crucial Act, using it to illuminate enduring issues and dif®culties in the legal concept of intellectual property. CATHERINE SEVILLE is director of studies in law at Newnham College, Cambridge. This Page Intentionally Left Blank CAMBRIDGE STUDIES IN ENGLISH LEGAL HISTORY Edited by J. H. BAKER Fellow of St Catherine's College, Cambridge Recent series titles include Sir William Scott, Lord Stowell Judge of the High Court of Admiralty 1798±1828 HENRY J. BOURGUIGNON Sir Henry Maine A study in Victorian jurisprudence R. C. J. COCKS Roman canon law in Reformation England R. H. HELMHOLZ Fundamental authority in late Medieval English law NORMAN DOE Law, politics and the Church of England The career of Stephen Lushington 1782±1873 S. M. WADDAMS The early history of the law of bills and notes A study of the origins of Anglo-American commercial law JAMES STEVEN ROGERS The law of evidence in Victorian England CHRISTOPHER ALLEN John Scott, Lord Eldon ROSE MELIKAN Literary copyright reform in Early Victorian England CATHERINE SEVILLE Engraving of Thomas Noon Talfourd (reproduced from the author's collection) LITERARY COPYRIGHT REFORM IN EARLY VICTORIAN ENGLAND THE FRAMING OF THE 1842 COPYRIGHT ACT CATHERINE SEVILLE PUBLISHED BY CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS (VIRTUAL PUBLISHING) FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE PRESS SYNDICATE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 IRP 40 West 20th Street, New York, NY 10011-4211, USA 477 Williamstown Road, Port Melbourne, VIC 3207, Australia http://www.cambridge.org © Catherine Seville 1999 This edition © Catherine Seville 2003 First published in printed format 1999 A catalogue record for the original printed book is available from the British Library and from the Library of Congress Original ISBN 0 521 62175 5 hardback ISBN 0 511 00916 X virtual (netLibrary Edition) FOR J. S. & A. H. S. This Page Intentionally Left Blank CONTENTS Acknowledgements page xi 1 INTRODUCTION 1 The 1842 Act ± passage and position 6 Copyright ± its nature and history 9 Talfourd and his aims 16 Con¯icting rationales 19 Alternatives to copyright ± a profession of authorship? 26 2 PETITIONS AND COPYRIGHT 33 Petitioning ± parliamentary history and background 33 Petitions ± forms and formalities 36 Petitions ± volume and subjects 37 3 CRITICS IN PARLIAMENT 40 The radical nexus 40 Political cross-currents 48 Brougham 51 Macaulay 60 4 CRITICS IN THE BOOK TRADE I: PRINT WORKERS AND THEIR ALLIES 68 Printers 69 The dispute spreads ± journeymen 1839±40 81 The process of diffusion 84 5 CRITICS IN THE BOOK TRADE II: PUBLISHING AND PUBLISHERS 100 The book trade and authors 101 Cheap publications ± the Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge 105 Cheap publications ± the book trade 109 ix x Contents Cooperation and organisation 111 The campaign against the bills 115 6 THE CAMPAIGN IN THE DAILY PRESS 128 London dailies 132 Evening papers 145 Conclusion 148 7 AUTHORS AND THE BEGINNINGS OF AUTHORS' ORGANISATIONS 149 Southey 153 Wordsworth ± campaign manager 159 8 THE MAKING OF THE CASE FOR THE BILL 176 Petitions ± those in favour 176 The argument in the periodicals 195 9CONCLUSION 210 Appendix I: Chronology of the bills 219 Appendix II: Successive versions of the bill 221 Appendix III: The Copyright Act 1842 258 Bibliography 277 Index 293 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I owe a substantial debt of gratitude to Bill Cornish, whose work and teaching ®rst sparked my interest in copyright. As my super- visor he encouraged what must at ®rst have seemed an unlikely project, and his support continues. I am also very grateful to Gill Sutherland: her rigour, patience and encouragement have been invaluable. Others have helped in other ways, particularly Tom Kass, who ®rst suggested that I study law. I have been privileged to work in Newnham throughout this time. xi 1 INTRODUCTION The subject of this book is Serjeant Talfourd's back-bench attempt to reform the law of copyright, an attempt which even- tually produced the Copyright Act of 1842. The idea of reform is potent in the history of England in the nineteenth century. It would be impossible to write a general history of the period without giving an account of the major constitutional reforms concerned with popular representation, which eventually trans- formed parliament. Yet other contemporary legislative reforms are arguably as striking, both in terms of their volume, and in terms of the changes which resulted. The many attempts to improve the law and its mechanisms make this period a signi®cant one for legal history. In the decade following the 1832 Reform Act, approaches to government in the widest sense were re-examined and trans- formed. This process had protean qualities: striking though the direction and velocity of the immediate changes could be, they often represented only the ®rst phase of lengthy trajectories. Nevertheless, it would be foolhardy (and unduly Whiggish) to regard these changes as inevitable; they were the product of many complex and con¯icting forces. Although nineteenth-century legislators did create a battery of signi®cant reforms, the ante- cedents and characteristics of individual measures varied consider- ably. To take the example central to this book, the changes to copyright law which resulted from the 1842 Copyright Act were not overtly typical of a reforming brief. However, the efforts to promote the various copyright measures (which began in 1836) were profoundly affected by the prevailing mood of reform, and the methods and mechanisms associated with it. Talfourd had originally envisaged a thoroughgoing consolidation of all aspects of copyright, an aim which might have been thought consistent with general reforming objectives. Such an assumption ignores the 1 2 Introduction complex and varied character of reforming activity at this time. Copyright instead became characterised as harmful by a signi®cant body of popular opinion, and a campaign of resistance was organised. After a lengthy battle, the bill's sponsors were forced to settle for the compromise effected by the 1842 Act. Although it is possible to reduce the principle of reform to little more than a Benthamite slogan, this is to ignore the subtlety and pervasiveness of the concept. The Great Reform Act of 1832 has (and had) a well-developed popular image as the keynote reform of the period. Its symbolic importance was certainly considerable. In terms of practical results, however, the 1832 Act's reputation bears only limited examination: later reform Acts, and related legislation, were arguably more signi®cant.1 Inevitably, the close link between the legislative and constitutional aspects of parlia- mentary reform ensured ample publicity for any statutory changes in this area. This should not be allowed to obscure the many other social and economic reforms of the period, which often required implementing legislation.2 In addition, there were deliberate attempts to render the law itself more coherent and accessible; speci®c legislative reforms covered many aspects of practice and procedure.3 1 For details of these see, for example, John Cannon, Parliamentary reform, 1640±1832 (Cambridge, 1973); Michael Brock, The Great Reform Act (1973); Norman Gash, Politics in the age of Peel (1953); Francis B. Smith, The making of the second Reform Bill (Cambridge, 1966); Norman Gash, Pillars of government and other essays on state and society, c. 1770±c. 1880 (1986); Andrew Jones, The politics of reform: 1884 (Cambridge, 1972); Martin D. Pugh, The making of modern British politics, 1867±1939 (1982). 2 For example, the Municipal Corporations Act 1835 began a process of local government reform which continued throughout the century. In another sphere, the New Poor Law Amendment Act 1834 made controversial changes intended to reduce expenditure. Other measures addressed a range of issues including public health and education, and also dealt with more general matters such as ®nancial and administrative ef®ciency. Geoffrey B. A. M. Finlayson, `The politics of municipal reform, 1835', English Historical Review 81 (1966), 673±92; Gillian Sutherland (ed.), Studies in the growth of nineteenth-century government (1972); Derek Fraser (ed.), The new poor law in the nineteenth century (1976). 3 For example Peel's Acts, which consolidated the criminal law and reduced the use of capital punishment. A considerable programme of reforms resulted, both before and after the 1832 Reform Act. For con®rmation see Holdsworth's catalogue of statutory changes (vol. XIII, ch. 4) which details an extraordinary list of interventions, large and small. Sir William Holdsworth, A history of English law, 16 vols. and index (1903±52); Leon Radzinowicz, A history of English criminal law (1948); William R. Cornish and Geoffrey de N. Clark, Law and society in England, 1750±1950 (1989). Introduction 3 The notion of law reform is certainly not peculiar to the nineteenth century. It has always been necessary for the law to respond to society's needs, sometimes willingly, sometimes under pressure.
Recommended publications
  • Comparative Landowner Property Defenses Against Eminent Domain
    University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor Electronic Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Major Papers 6-18-2021 Comparative Landowner Property Defenses Against Eminent Domain Thomas A. Oriet University of Windsor Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd Recommended Citation Oriet, Thomas A., "Comparative Landowner Property Defenses Against Eminent Domain" (2021). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 8611. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd/8611 This online database contains the full-text of PhD dissertations and Masters’ theses of University of Windsor students from 1954 forward. These documents are made available for personal study and research purposes only, in accordance with the Canadian Copyright Act and the Creative Commons license—CC BY-NC-ND (Attribution, Non-Commercial, No Derivative Works). Under this license, works must always be attributed to the copyright holder (original author), cannot be used for any commercial purposes, and may not be altered. Any other use would require the permission of the copyright holder. Students may inquire about withdrawing their dissertation and/or thesis from this database. For additional inquiries, please contact the repository administrator via email ([email protected]) or by telephone at 519-253-3000ext. 3208. COMPARATIVE LANDOWNER PROPERTY DEFENSES AGAINST EMINENT DOMAIN by Thomas A. Oriet A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies through the Faculty of Law in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Laws at the University of Windsor Windsor, Ontario, Canada © 2021 Thomas Oriet COMPARATIVE LANDOWNER PROPERTY DEFENSES AGAINST EMINENT DOMAIN by Thomas A. Oriet APPROVED BY: ______________________________________________ C. Trudeau Department of Economics ______________________________________________ B.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright Act 1991
    c i e AT 8 of 1991 COPYRIGHT ACT 1991 Copyright Act 1991 Index c i e COPYRIGHT ACT 1991 Index Section Page PART I – SUBSISTENCE, OWNERSHIP AND DURATION OF COPYRIGHT 13 Introductory 13 1 Copyright and copyright works ................................................................................. 13 2 Rights subsisting in copyright works ........................................................................ 14 Description of work and related provisions 14 3 Literary, dramatic and musical works ....................................................................... 14 3A Databases ....................................................................................................................... 15 4 Artistic works ................................................................................................................ 15 5 Sound recordings .......................................................................................................... 15 5A Films ............................................................................................................................... 16 6 Broadcasts ...................................................................................................................... 16 6A Safeguards in relation to certain satellite broadcasts............................................... 17 7 [Repealed] ...................................................................................................................... 18 8 Published editions .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • What Is the Point of Copyright History? Reflections on Copyright at Common Law in 1774 by H
    CREATe Working Paper 2016/04 (March 2016) What is the Point of Copyright History? Reflections on Copyright at Common Law in 1774 by H. Tomás Gómez-Arostegui Editors Elena Cooper Ronan Deazley University of Glasgow Queen’s University Belfast [email protected] [email protected] CREATe Working Paper Series DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.47710. This release was supported by the RCUK funded Centre for Copyright and New Business Models in the Creative Economy (CREATe), AHRC Grant Number AH/K000179/1. What is the Point of Copyright History? Reflections on Copyright at Common Law in 1774 by H. Tomás Gómez-Arostegui Elena Cooper and Ronan Deazley (eds) 1. What is the Point of Copyright History? 3 Elena Cooper and Ronan Deazley 2. The Persistent Myth of Perpetual Common Law Copyright 11 Howard B. Abrams 3. A Few Remarks on Copyright at Common law in 1774 24 Lionel Bently 4. A Page of History 31 Oren Bracha 5. Donaldson and the Muse of History 38 Mark Rose 6. Personal Comments on a Policy Perspective 43 Charlotte Waelde 7. A Reply to my Colleagues regarding Donaldson v Becket 46 H. Tomás Gómez-Arostegui 8. Excerpts from the Symposium 61 Elena Cooper and Ronan Deazley (eds) Appendix 83 What is the Point of Copyright History? Elena Cooper and Ronan Deazley An understanding of the past – how we got to where we are today – informs the approach of much recent scholarship about copyright. This has been traced to a ‘historical turn’ in scholarship in the late 1990s, which marked a move away from the more forward-looking approach of the earlier twentieth century, when lawyers had little time for historical perspectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Malawi Independence Act 1964 CHAPTER 46
    Malawi Independence Act 1964 CHAPTER 46 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Section 1. Fully responsible status of Malawi. 2. Consequential modifications of British Nationality Acts. 3. Retention of citizenship of United Kingdom and Colonies by certain citizens of Malawi. 4. Consequential modification of other enactments. 5. Judicial Committee of Privy Council. 6. Divorce jurisdiction. 7. Interpretation. 8. Short title. SCHEDULES : Schedule 1-Legislative Powers in Malawi. Schedule 2-Amendments not affecting the Law of Malawi. Malawi Independence Act 1964 CH. 46 1 ELIZABETH II 1964 CHAPTER 46 An Act to make provision for and in connection with the attainment by Nyasaland of fully responsible status within the Commonwealth. [ 10th June 1964] BE IT ENACTED by the Queen's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:- 1.-(1) On and after 6th July 1964 (in this Act referred to as Fully " the appointed day ") the territories which immediately before responsible protectorate status of the appointed day are comprised in the Nyasaland Malawi. shall together form part of Her Majesty's dominions under the name of Malawi ; and on and after that day Her Majesty's Government in the United Kingdom shall have no responsibility for the government of those territories. (2) No Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom passed on or after the appointed day shall extend or be deemed to extend to Malawi as part of its law ; and on and after that day the provisions of Schedule 1 to this Act shall have effect with respect to legislative powers in Malawi.
    [Show full text]
  • Place and Mobilities in the Maritime World: the Royal Mail Steam Packet Company in the Caribbean, C
    1 PLACE AND MOBILITIES IN THE MARITIME WORLD: THE ROYAL MAIL STEAM PACKET COMPANY IN THE CARIBBEAN, C. 1838 TO 1914 Anyaa Anim-Addo Royal Holloway, University of London PhD Human Geography 2 Declaration of Authorship I, Anyaa Anim-Addo, hereby declare that this thesis and the work presented in it is entirely my own. Where I have consulted the work of others, this is always clearly stated. Signed: ______________________________________________________ Date: ______________________________________________________ 3 Abstract The empirical subject of this thesis is the Royal Mail Steam Packet Company (RMSPC), a British-based steamship company that served the Caribbean from 1842, and extended operations into South America in 1851. I construct a postcolonial historical geography of the RMSPC as it operated in the ‘expanded’ post-emancipation Caribbean. By analysing the steamship service as a network rather than as a ‘tool’ of empire, I foreground the mobilities constructed by this Company, and explore how these mobilities impacted upon maritime places in the Caribbean. In so doing, I develop a ‘tidalectic’ approach to the RMSPC’s past, by expanding upon Kamau Brathwaite’s concept. I argue that tidalectics, in intersection with the ‘new mobilities paradigm’, contributes to an advance in understandings of maritime history, since together they facilitate mobile examinations of the relationship between sea and shore. To develop analysis of the RMSPC’s maritime mobilities, four substantive case studies are presented. The first case study focuses on the RMSPC’s ports-of-call, as mapped by the scheme of routes. The second such chapter considers the steamship itself as place, particularly with reference to social and cultural dynamics.
    [Show full text]
  • Licensing of the Press Act of 1662
    Cum privilegio: Licensing of the Press Act of 1662 The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Nipps, Karen. 2014. “Cum Privilegio: Licensing of the Press Act of 1662.” The Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy 84 (4) (October): 494–500. doi:10.1086/677787. Published Version doi:10.1086/677787 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:17219056 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Cum privilegio: Licensing of the Press Act of 1662 HISTORY OF THE BOOK opyright has troubled humans for almost as long as our thoughts have been re- corded. The ancient Greeks, Jews, and Romans all set down laws concerning an author’s C personal rights, a sponsor/publisher’s economic rights, an owner’s rights to an individual copy, and a ruler’s right to censor and to regulate the industry. The Church and various gov- ernments ðboth totalitarian and democraticÞ have tried copyrighting any number of times. We are still at it today. As of the writing of this piece, currently pending in Washington is legisla- tion that some have referred to as “the next great copyright act” ðPallante 2013Þ. This act—if it ever comes to pass—will have the American government ruling on procedures regarding such varied property as orphan works, musical recordings, film, and fashion design, particularly as they relate to digitization and the Internet.
    [Show full text]
  • Digitising the Edwin Morgan Scrapbooks: Copyright Guidance Notes (1St Edition)
    Digitising the Edwin Morgan Scrapbooks: Copyright Guidance Notes (1st Edition) Ronan Deazley, Kerry Patterson & Paul Torremans COPYRIGHT IN TITLES AND NEWSPAPER HEADLINES 1 COPYRIGHT IN THE TYPOGRAPHICAL ARRANGEMENT OF PUBLISHED 7 EDITIONS COPYRIGHT IN PSEUDONYMOUS AND ANONYMOUS WORKS 10 COPYRIGHT IN NEWSPAPER ARTICLES 13 COPYRIGHT IN PHOTOGRAPHS: DURATION 19 COPYRIGHT IN PHOTOGRAPHS: OWNERSHIP 26 USING INSUBSTANTIAL PARTS OF A COPYRIGHT PROTECTED WORK 33 COPYRIGHT ACROSS BORDERS 38 MORAL RIGHTS: ATTRIBUTION 45 MORAL RIGHTS: FALSE ATTRIBUTION 52 MORAL RIGHTS: INTEGRITY 55 MORAL RIGHTS: THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY IN CERTAIN PHOTOGRAPHS AND 66 FILMS This is a compendium of the first version of the Guidance Notes on aspects of UK Copyright law that were created as part of Digitising the Edwin Morgan Scrapbooks, through support by the RCUK funded Centre for Copyright and New Business Models in the Creative Economy (CREATe), AHRC Grant Number AH/K000179/1. The second edition, edited by K. Patterson, can be downloaded individually or as part of the CREATe Working Paper: Digitising the Edwin Morgan Scrapbooks: Copyright Guidance Notes (2nd Edition) available at www.digitisingmorgan.org/resources. Date Created: January 2017 Cite as: R. Deazley, K. Patterson and P. Torremans, Digitising the Edwin Morgan Scrapbooks: Copyright Guidance Notes (1st Edition) (2017), available at: www.digitisingmorgan.org/resources COPYRIGHT IN TITLES AND NEWSPAPER HEADLINES Ronan Deazley and Kerry Patterson 1. Introduction What are the implications of the law for digitisation projects involving newspaper headlines and other titles? This guidance explores the legal background to copyright protection in titles and newspaper headlines, with reference to relevant cases. 2. Legislative Context Literary works first received statutory protection in the UK under the Statute of Anne 1710.
    [Show full text]
  • Literary Property in Scotland in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth
    Edinburgh Research Explorer Literary Property in Scotland in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries Citation for published version: MacQueen, H 2016, Literary Property in Scotland in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries. in I Alexander & HT Gomez-Arostegui (eds), Research Handbook on the History of Copyright Law. Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp. 119-138. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783472406 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.4337/9781783472406 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Peer reviewed version Published In: Research Handbook on the History of Copyright Law Publisher Rights Statement: This is a draft of a chapter that has been published by Edward Elgar Publishing in The History of Copyright Law; A Handbook of Contemporary Research edited by Isabella Alexander and H. Tomás Gómez-Arostegui, published in 2016. http://www.e-elgar.com/shop/the-history-of-copyright-law General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 30. Sep. 2021 [fresh page][cn] 7. [ct] Literary property in Scotland in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries [au]Hector MacQueen [a] 1.
    [Show full text]
  • (Repeal of the Copyright Act 1911) (Jersey) Order 2012
    Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). UK Statutory Instruments are not carried in their revised form on this site. STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2012 No. 1753 COPYRIGHT The Copyright (Repeal of the Copyright Act 1911) (Jersey) Order 2012 Made - - - - 10th July 2012 Coming into force in accordance with article 1 It appears to Her Majesty that provision with respect to copyright has been made in the law of the Bailiwick of Jersey otherwise than by extending the provisions of Part 1 of the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988(1) to the Bailiwick of Jersey. Accordingly, Her Majesty, by and with the advice of Her Privy Council, in exercise of the powers conferred on Her by section 170 of, and paragraph 36(3) of Schedule 1 to, the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 makes the following Order: Citation and Commencement 1. This Order may be cited as the Copyright (Repeal of the Copyright Act 1911) (Jersey) Order 2012 and comes into force on the day on which Part 1 of the Intellectual Property (Unregistered Rights) (Jersey) Law 2011(2) comes into force in its entirety. Repeal of the Copyright Act 1911 as it extends to Jersey 2. To the extent that it has effect in the Bailiwick of Jersey, the Copyright Act 1911(3) is repealed. Richard Tilbrook Clerk of the Privy Council (1) 1988 c.48. Amendments have been made to the 1988 Act but none are material for the purposes of this Order. (2) L.29/2011. (3) 1911 c.46. The 1911 Act was maintained in force in relation to Jersey by paragraph 41 of Schedule 7 to the Copyright Act 1956 (c.74) and when the 1956 Act was repealed, by paragraph 36(1) of Schedule 1 to the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
    [Show full text]
  • (Jersey) Law 2011 (Appointed Day) Act 201
    STATES OF JERSEY r DRAFT INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (UNREGISTERED RIGHTS) (JERSEY) LAW 2011 (APPOINTED DAY) ACT 201- Lodged au Greffe on 30th October 2012 by the Minister for Economic Development STATES GREFFE 2012 Price code: B P.111 DRAFT INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (UNREGISTERED RIGHTS) (JERSEY) LAW 2011 (APPOINTED DAY) ACT 201- REPORT Overview The Intellectual Property (Unregistered Rights) (Jersey) Law 2011 was adopted by the States on 1st December 2010, sanctioned by Order of Her Majesty in Council on 16th November 2011 and registered in the Royal Court on 9th December 2011. Article 411(2) of the Law provides for it to come into force on such day or days as the States may appoint. The Draft Intellectual Property (Unregistered Rights) (Jersey) Law 2011 (Appointed Day) Act 201- will bring the whole of the Intellectual Property (Unregistered Rights) (Jersey) Law 2011 into force 7 days after the Act is adopted by the States. Background The Intellectual Property (Unregistered Rights) (Jersey) Law 2011 completely replaces and modernises current copyright law in the Island. The current law is provided by an extension to the Island of the UK Copyright Act 1911, an Act which has not provided copyright law in the UK since 1956. The Law also makes provision about other unregistered intellectual property rights. The provisions in the Law comply with major international conventions and treaties about unregistered intellectual property rights, and so the Law paves the way for Jersey to have the UK’s membership of these extended to the Island. Convention membership delivers automatic protection for the relevant creative content in all convention countries.
    [Show full text]
  • D4.1 Analysis of Available Resources in the AV Sector
    Project Number: 325135 Project Acronym: FORW AR D Project Title: Framework for a EU-wide Audiovisual Orphan Works Registry Instrument: Pilot B Thematic Priority: CIP-ICT-PSP-2012-6 D4.1 Analysis of available resources in the AV sector Due Date: 30/06/2014 Submission Date: 12/07/2014 Start Date of Project: 01/07/2013 Duration of Project: 36 months Partner in Charge of Deliverable EYE Film Institute Version Status Final Dissemination Level PU File Name: FORWARD D4.1.docx FORWARD Framework for a EU-wide Audiovisual Orphan Works Registry CIP ICT-PSP 325135 Revision History Revision Date Author Organisation Description 1 27/06/2014 EYE Team EYE Draft 2 02/07/2014 GScipione CINECA Revision 3 10/07/2014 NMazznti CRB Final revision D4.1 – Analysis of available resources in the AV sector 2 / 156 EYE Film Institute FORWARD Framework for a EU-wide Audiovisual Orphan Works Registry CIP ICT-PSP 325135 Table of Contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 3 1.1 Legal environment................................................................................................................................ 3 1.1.1 Protection term.......................................................................................................................................................3 1.1.2 Rightsholders .........................................................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Why the U.K. Adaptation Right Is Superior to the U.S. Derivative Work Right Patrick R
    Nebraska Law Review Volume 92 | Issue 4 Article 5 2014 Why the U.K. Adaptation Right Is Superior to the U.S. Derivative Work Right Patrick R. Goold University of California, Berkeley, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nlr Recommended Citation Patrick R. Goold, Why the U.K. Adaptation Right Is Superior to the U.S. Derivative Work Right, 92 Neb. L. Rev. (2014) Available at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nlr/vol92/iss4/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law, College of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Nebraska Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Patrick R. Goold* Why the U.K. Adaptation Right Is Superior to the U.S. Derivative Work Right TABLE OF CONTENTS I. History of the Derivative Work Right in Anglo- American Copyright ................................... 849 A. Anglo-American Copyright During the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries ......................... 850 B. Derivative Works in Twentieth Century U.S. Copyright ......................................... 856 1. The 1909 Copyright Act........................ 856 2. From 1909 to 1976 ............................ 858 a. Motion Pictures ............................ 860 b. Radio Broadcasting ........................ 862 c. Cable Television ........................... 865 3. The Copyright Act 1976........................ 866 C. Derivative Works in Twentieth Century U.K. Copyright ......................................... 868 1. The 1911 Act and the Gramophone Case ....... 869 2. The Copyright Act 1956 and the Copyright, Designs, and Patents Act 1988 ................. 871 D. Summary ......................................... 874 II. Modern Doctrine of the Derivative Work Right in Anglo- American Copyright ................................... 874 A. The Right of Reproduction ........................
    [Show full text]