The Funnel Web and Common Spider Bites

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Funnel Web and Common Spider Bites CLINICAL PRACTICE • Envenomation The funnel web and common spider bites B Nimorakiotakis, MBBS, FACEM, is Staff Specialist, Epworth Hospital and Sunshine Hospital, and Fellow, The Australian Venom Research Unit, Department of Pharmacology, the University of Melbourne, Victoria. KD Winkel, MBBS, BMedSc, PhD, FACTM, is Director, The Australian Venom Research Unit, Department of Pharmacology, the University of Melbourne, Victoria, and President-Elect, the Australasian College of Tropical Medicine. BACKGROUND Spider bites are one of the commonest Sydney funnel web spider The funnel web spiders, encompassed types of bites or stings presenting for man- within the genera Atrax and Hadronyche, agement in general practice and emergency The spider responsible for the most signifi- are the most dangerous spiders in the medicine departments. While in most cases cant bites is the Sydney funnel web spider world. Although the incidence of the responsible species is not identified and (Atrax robustus), a species geographically envenomation is low, funnel web spiders the effects self limited, certain species can limited to an area within 160 km radius of remain a cause of considerable public inflict life threatening bites. the Sydney (New South Wales) central busi- concern. However, most common spider ness district.1 The Sydney funnel web bites produce only minor effects requiring Funnel web spiders spider is a large spider with a glossy black only symptomatic treatment. More than 30 species of the highly danger- cephalothorax and a dark abdomen. The OBJECTIVE ous funnel web spiders are found on the female is larger and more robust than the This article describes the clinical features eastern seaboard of Australia including parts male (Figure 2). The male has a spur on its and treatment of the funnel web spider of South Australia and Tasmania (Figure 1). second leg and the spinnerets (from which and that of its close relative, the mouse The venom appears to be particularly harmful the spider produces silk) of both sexes are spiders. It also covers the question of necrotising arachnidism as well as bites to primates, whereas other mammals are rel- long and obvious, especially the terminal from other common species of spiders. atively unaffected. While many of these spinneret. Both sexes of this species are spiders remain unnamed and the venom very aggressive. When disturbed, they will DISCUSSION unstudied, all funnel web spiders belong rear up ready to strike with their large, Appropriate first aid combined with the either to the genera Atrax or Hadronyche. downward pointing fangs. The female administration of specific antivenom can be Identification and classification of funnel web spider constructs a burrow that may be 30 life saving for funnel web spider bites. True necrotising arachnidism appears to be rare. spiders is often difficult – with some species cm or more deep. Some use crevices in If suspected, clinicians must first consider resembling the less dangerous trapdoor rocks or around house foundations and the very wide differential diagnoses. spiders. Any suspicious spider that has colonies may contain as many as 100 inflicted even an apparently minor injury spiders. The male spiders tend to roam and within the geographic distribution of these often enter houses, particularly during the spiders should be treated as if it were a summer months and in wet weather. Bites funnel web spider. If the spider is captured or may occur when the spider has taken up killed, formal identification is encouraged – temporary residence in bedding, clothing or even a badly damaged spider can often be footwear, or when it is trodden on. successfully identified by arachnologists. Most bites occur in the warmer months, and are predominantly sustained on the 244Reprinted from Australian Family Physician Vol. 33, No. 4, April 2004 Clinical practice: The funnel web and common spider bites Figure 2. Comparison of size and appearance of Figure 3. Female Northern funnel web spider male (left) and female (right) Sydney funnel web Photo courtesy Vern Daffin Figure 1. Geographical distribution of funnel web spiders Photo courtesy Vern Daffin spiders Ç-atracotoxins (Ç-ACTXs). The Ç-ACTXs act • hypertension, tachycardia and vasocon- extremities. Children are especially at risk by slowing sodium current inactivation striction (hypotension may occur later) due to their lower body weight and the resulting in spontaneous repetitive firing of • local and generalised muscle fasciculation potential for multiple bites to occur if spiders action potentials.7 This triggers the release and spasm which may be prolonged and are handled. However, considering the large of excessive – and eventual exhaustion of – violent (facial, tongue or intercostal population at risk, effective envenomation is predominantly sympathetic neurotransmit- muscles, trismus) and difficult to manage. very uncommon. The male species is consid- ters leading to the characteristic biphasic Phase 2 is characterised by: ered to be the most venomous, and all clinical syndrome. • hypotension 13 funnel web spider fatalities documented • hypoventilation and apnoea before the introduction of antivenom in 1980 Symptoms and signs of • continuing acute noncardiogenic pul- have been attributed to the male spider.1 envenomation monary oedema Sydney funnel web spiders are usually easily The initial bite is usually painful and fang • coma, and, finally identifiable to the trained eye, but any large marks are generally seen. The envenomation • irreversible cardiac arrest. dark spider found in the geographic distribu- syndrome is generally characterised by two tion area should be treated with suspicion. phases: the first begins within minutes of the First aid and treatment bite, and the second when the secretions A summary of the recommended first aid and Other funnel web spiders subside – typically many hours later.1 medical treatment for funnel web spider bite There are 12 described species and at least Historically deaths have occurred in either is presented in Figure 4. The key points are: 20 unnamed species in the more widely dis- phase of envenomation. • ensure airway, breathing and circulation tributed genus Hadronyche.2,3 They are also Phase 1 is characterised by: (ABCs) are maintained aggressive spiders with at least six species Local effects: • prompt application of pressure immobilisa- described as having a similar envenomation • bite site may be painful for days to weeks tion bandage (PIB) to the affected limb syndrome to the Sydney funnel web spider.4 because of direct trauma and acidity of venom • transfer to hospital, ideally where As the potency of Hadronyche spp venom but no local necrosis has been recorded antivenom, resuscitation equipment and appears variable in relationship to sex, size, • local swelling, erythema and occasionally monitoring is available health, feeding habits and geographical dis- sweating. • intravenous access should be obtained tribution, all bites from these spiders should General effects: • PIB should be removed only in an area be managed as for the Sydney funnel • numbness around the mouth and spasms/ were appropriate resuscitation can occur web spider. fasciculation of the tongue and antivenom is available. (If PIB has • nausea and vomiting, abdominal pain, been removed and the patient deterio- Pathogenesis acute gastric dilatation rates it should be re-applied) Although most funnel web spider bites are • profuse sweating, salivation, lacrimation, • local tissue enzymes may inactivate the thought to be ineffective or ‘dry’, the clini- piloerection venom, therefore the use of PIB may not cal syndrome can be devastating and has • severe dyspnoea as a result of noncardio- only be helpful in delaying the onset of been lethal in both adults and children. genic pulmonary oedema symptoms, but may allow for a degree of While the causative venom is multicompo- • mental status can rapidly progress from inactivation of the venom nent, the key neurotoxins are the confusion to irrationality or coma • administer antivenom as per protocol in Reprinted from Australian Family Physician Vol. 33, No. 4, April 2004245 Clinical practice: The funnel web and common spider bites Figure 4 if systemic signs of envenoma- caution in the event of hypotension antivenom in 1980, there have been no deaths tion are present because of noncardiogenic pulmonary reported and time required in hospital has dra- • until antivenom is available supportive care oedema matically decreased from an average of 14 days8 of the envenomed patient may include: – relapse is possible and may manifest to less than 2 days.1 Moreover, the antivenom is – supplemental oxygen as dyspnoea secondary to noncardio- extremely safe – no cases of anaphylaxis have – atropine (0.6 mg initial dose for an adult) genic oedema which usually responds been reported and only one case of serum sick- to reduce salivation and bronchorrhoea to further antivenom (this should not ness has been associated with the antivenom.9 – nasogastric aspiration because of be confused with iatrogenic pulmonary gastric dilatation oedema as a result of intravenous Mouse spiders – muscle relaxants and sedatives to facil- overload, particularly in children) Mouse spiders (Missulena spp) are medium itate mechanical ventilation and control • if no symptoms or signs of envenomation sized and robust spiders found throughout intracranial pressure have started 4 hours after the removal of first mainland Australia. Currently there are – intubation and ventilation for respiratory
Recommended publications
  • Supraspecific Names in Spider Systematic and Their Nomenclatural Problems
    Arachnologische Mitteilungen / Arachnology Letters 55: 42-45 Karlsruhe, April 2018 Supraspecific names in spider systematic and their nomenclatural problems Yuri M. Marusik doi: 10.30963/aramit5507 Abstract. Three different types of the names used in spider systematics are recognized and discussed: 1) typified taxonomic names, 2) non-typified taxonomic names, and 3) non-taxonomic names. Typified names are those from genus to superfamily group names; they are regulated by the ICZN. Non-typified names are used for taxonomic groups higher than superfamilies (e.g., Haplogynae, Mesothelae, etc.); they are not regulated by the ICZN but have an authorship, a fixed year of publication and are incorporated in a hierarchical classification. Non-taxonomic names are not regulated by any formal rules, unranked, have no authorship or description, and are non-typified. Some difficulties connected with the non-typified names in spider systematics are briefly discussed. Senior synonyms of some non-typified and non-taxonomic names are discussed, and suggestions are given on how to deal with the non-typified names lacking senior synonyms. Keywords: clade name, non-typified name, typified name. Zusammenfassung. Supraspezifische Namen in der Spinnensystematik und ihre nomenklatorischen Probleme. Drei verschie- dene Namenstypen in der Spinnensystematik werden diskutiert: 1) typisierte taxonomische Namen, 2) nicht-typisierte taxonomische Namen sowie 3) nicht-taxonomische Namen. Typisierte Namen reichen von Gattungen bis zu Überfamilien und sind durch die ICZN reguliert. Nicht-typisierte Namen werden für taxonomische Einheiten oberhalb von Überfamilien verwendet (z. B. Haplogynae, Meso- thelae), sind nicht durch die ICZN reguliert, haben aber Autoren, ein Erstbeschreibungsjahr und werden in hierarchischen Klassifikatio- nen verwendet.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Analyses of Venoms from American and African Sicarius Spiders That Differ in Sphingomyelinase D Activity
    This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit: http://www.elsevier.com/copyright Author's personal copy Toxicon 55 (2010) 1274–1282 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Toxicon journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/toxicon Comparative analyses of venoms from American and African Sicarius spiders that differ in sphingomyelinase D activity Pamela A. Zobel-Thropp*, Melissa R. Bodner 1, Greta J. Binford Department of Biology, Lewis and Clark College, 0615 SW Palatine Hill Road, Portland, OR 97219, USA article info abstract Article history: Spider venoms are cocktails of toxic proteins and peptides, whose composition varies at Received 27 August 2009 many levels. Understanding patterns of variation in chemistry and bioactivity is funda- Received in revised form 14 January 2010 mental for understanding factors influencing variation. The venom toxin sphingomyeli- Accepted 27 January 2010 nase D (SMase D) in sicariid spider venom (Loxosceles and Sicarius) causes dermonecrotic Available online 8 February 2010 lesions in mammals. Multiple forms of venom-expressed genes with homology to SMase D are expressed in venoms of both genera.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Anti-Predator Devices of Spiders* Invaders Away Or Kill and Eat Them
    Bull. Br. arachnol. Soc. (1995) 10 (3), 81-96 81 A review of the anti-predator devices of spiders* invaders away or kill and eat them. The pirate spiders (Mimetidae) that have been studied feed almost J. L. Cloudsley-Thompson exclusively on other spiders, whilst certain Salticidae 10 Battishill Street, (Portia spp.) feed not only upon insects, but sometimes London Nl 1TE also on other jumping spiders, and even tackle large orb-weavers in their webs (see below). Several other Summary families and genera, including Archaeidae, Palpimanus (Palpimanidae), Argyrodes and Theridion (Theridiidae), The predators of spiders are mostly either about the and Chorizopes (Araneidae) contain species that include same size as their prey (arthropods) or much larger (vertebrates), against each of which different types of de- other spiders in their diet. Sexual cannibalism has been fence have evolved. Primary defences include anachoresis, reviewed by Elgar (1992). Other books in which the phenology, crypsis, protective resemblance and disguise, enemies of spiders are discussed include: Berland (1932), spines and warning coloration, mimicry (especially of ants), Bristowe (1958), Cloudsley-Thompson (1958, 1980), cocoons and retreats, barrier webs, web stabilimenta and Edmunds (1974), Gertsch (1949), Main (1976), Millot detritus, and communal webs. Secondary defences are flight, dropping to the ground, colour change and thanatosis, (1949), Preston-Mafham, R. & K. (1984), Savory (1928), web vibration, whirling and bouncing, autotomy, venoms Thomas (1953) and Wise (1993). (For earlier references, and defensive fluids, urticating setae, warning sounds and see Warburton, 1909). deimatic displays. The anti-predator adaptations of spiders The major predators of spiders fall into two cate- are extremely complex, and combinations of the devices gories: (a) those about the same size as their prey (mainly listed frequently occur.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Project Completion Report
    CEPF SMALL GRANT FINAL PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT Organization Legal Name: - Tarantula (Araneae: Theraphosidae) spider diversity, distribution and habitat-use: A study on Protected Area adequacy and Project Title: conservation planning at a landscape level in the Western Ghats of Uttara Kannada district, Karnataka Date of Report: 18 August 2011 Dr. Manju Siliwal Wildlife Information Liaison Development Society Report Author and Contact 9-A, Lal Bahadur Colony, Near Bharathi Colony Information Peelamedu Coimbatore 641004 Tamil Nadu, India CEPF Region: The Western Ghats Region (Sahyadri-Konkan and Malnad-Kodugu Corridors). 2. Strategic Direction: To improve the conservation of globally threatened species of the Western Ghats through systematic conservation planning and action. The present project aimed to improve the conservation status of two globally threatened (Molur et al. 2008b, Siliwal et al., 2008b) ground dwelling theraphosid species, Thrigmopoeus insignis and T. truculentus endemic to the Western Ghats through systematic conservation planning and action. Investment Priority 2.1 Monitor and assess the conservation status of globally threatened species with an emphasis on lesser-known organisms such as reptiles and fish. The present project was focused on an ignored or lesser-known group of spiders called Tarantulas/ Theraphosid spiders and provided valuable information on population status and potential conservation sites in Uttara Kannada district, which will help in future monitoring and assessment of conservation status of the two globally threatened theraphosid species T. insignis and Near Threatened T. truculentus. Investment Priority 2.3. Evaluate the existing protected area network for adequate globally threatened species representation and assess effectiveness of protected area types in biodiversity conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Arthropod Envenomation
    Arthropod Envenomation Michael R. Loomis, DVM, MA, DACZM North Carolina Zoological Park Hymenoptera Envenomation Order Hymenoptera Family Vespidae- wasps Family Formicidae- ants Familt Mutillidae- velvet ants Family Apidae- bees • Stinger is a modified ovipositor Bee and Wasp Venom Components • Proteins, peptides and • Apitoxin – 52% Melitten (potent anti- amines inflammatory agent that – Phospholipase increases production of cortisol) – Histamine – 10-12% Phospholipase A2 – Bradykinin – 2-5% Aldolapin (blocks – cyclooxygenase) Acetylcholine – 1-3% Hyuronidase – Dopamine – 0.5-2% Histamine – Seratonin – 1-2% Dopamine and noradrenaline – Mast cell degranulating – 2% Protease-inhibitors peptide – Apamine increases cortisol – Mastoparan production, mild neurotoxin Ant Venom Components • Fire ants- 95% alkaloid (Unique among ants) • Most other ants, similar to bee and wasp venom • Harvester ant venom contains a hemolysin Venom Toxicity Family Common Name LD 50 (mg/kg) Apidae Honey bee 2.8 Mutillidae Velvet ant 71.0 Vespidae Paper wasp 2.4 Vespidae Yellowjacket 3.5 Formicidae Harvester ant 0.66 Formicidae Maricopa Harvester ant 0.12 Morbidity and Mortality Bees and Wasps • In US, 9.3 million ant • 17-56% produce local stings and 1 million reactions stings of other • Hymenoptera/year 1-2% produce generalized reactions • More deaths/year than any other type of • 5% seek medical care envenomation • 30-120 deaths from • Most deaths are the wasp and bee result of Anaphylaxis stings/year Local Reactions • Pain • Edema which may extend 10 cm from
    [Show full text]
  • A Summary List of Fossil Spiders
    A summary list of fossil spiders compiled by Jason A. Dunlop (Berlin), David Penney (Manchester) & Denise Jekel (Berlin) Suggested citation: Dunlop, J. A., Penney, D. & Jekel, D. 2010. A summary list of fossil spiders. In Platnick, N. I. (ed.) The world spider catalog, version 10.5. American Museum of Natural History, online at http://research.amnh.org/entomology/spiders/catalog/index.html Last udated: 10.12.2009 INTRODUCTION Fossil spiders have not been fully cataloged since Bonnet’s Bibliographia Araneorum and are not included in the current Catalog. Since Bonnet’s time there has been considerable progress in our understanding of the spider fossil record and numerous new taxa have been described. As part of a larger project to catalog the diversity of fossil arachnids and their relatives, our aim here is to offer a summary list of the known fossil spiders in their current systematic position; as a first step towards the eventual goal of combining fossil and Recent data within a single arachnological resource. To integrate our data as smoothly as possible with standards used for living spiders, our list follows the names and sequence of families adopted in the Catalog. For this reason some of the family groupings proposed in Wunderlich’s (2004, 2008) monographs of amber and copal spiders are not reflected here, and we encourage the reader to consult these studies for details and alternative opinions. Extinct families have been inserted in the position which we hope best reflects their probable affinities. Genus and species names were compiled from established lists and cross-referenced against the primary literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Nest Site Choice by the Intertidal Spider Desis Formidabilis (Araneae: Desidae) and Nest Utilisation by Its Hymenopteran Egg Parasitoid
    This is a repository copy of Nest site choice by the intertidal spider Desis formidabilis (Araneae: Desidae) and nest utilisation by its hymenopteran egg parasitoid. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/139051/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Owen, CA, van Noort, S, Compton, SG orcid.org/0000-0002-1247-8058 et al. (1 more author) (2019) Nest site choice by the intertidal spider Desis formidabilis (Araneae: Desidae) and nest utilisation by its hymenopteran egg parasitoid. Ecological Entomology, 44 (1). pp. 62-70. ISSN 0307-6946 https://doi.org/10.1111/een.12675 (c) 2018, The Royal Entomological Society. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: 'Owen, CA, van Noort, S, Compton, SG, and Coetzee, JA (2018). Nest site choice by the intertidal spider Desis formidabilis (Araneae: Desidae) and nest utilisation by its hymenopteran egg parasitoid. Ecological Entomology,' which has been published in final form at [https://doi.org/10.1111/een.12675]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request.
    [Show full text]
  • Note on Suspected Brown Recluse Spiders (Araneae: Sicariidae) in South Carolina
    Faculty Research Note Note on Suspected Brown Recluse Spiders (Araneae: Sicariidae) in South Carolina Robert J. Wolff* South University, 9 Science Court, Columbia, SC 29203 The general public believes that brown recluse spiders (Loxosceles Filistatidae (Kukulcania hibernalis) 22 specimens reclusa) are widespread where they live and that these spiders are Lycosidae 21 (3 in one package, 5 in another) frequent causes of bites resulting in dermonecrosis. Research over the Pholcidae 17 past twenty years shows these reports to be unfounded. Vetter (2005) Miturgidae 8 examined 1,773 specimens sent in from across the U.S. as brown recluse Theridiidae 8 spiders and no specimens were found from areas outside the species Agelenidae 7 range, with the exception of a specimen from California. Araneidae 6 Clubionidae 6 The reported range of the brown recluse spider includes all or major Thomisidae 6 portions of Arkansas, Oklahoma, Texas, Louisiana, Alabama, Tennessee, Gnaphosidae 4 Kentucky, Illinois, Missouri and Kansas. Minor portions of the brown Corinnidae 3 recluse range were previously reported in Iowa, Indiana, Ohio, New Philodromidae 3 Mexico, North Carolina, Georgia, and South Carolina. The most recent Amaurobiidae 1 map (Vetter, 2015) does not include South Carolina, and only the far Pisauridae 1 western tip of North Carolina and northwestern corner of Georgia. Scytodidae (Scytodes thoracica) 1 Unidentifiable 4 Schuman and Caldwell (1991) found that South Carolina physicians reported treating 478 cases of brown recluse spider envenomations in 1990 alone. This seems like a very high number, unfortunately all or No brown recluses were identified from the specimens obtained in this almost all of these are probably not brown recluse spider bites.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Geographic and Intersexual Chemical Variation in Venoms of the Spider Tegenaria Agrestis (Agelenidae)
    Toxicon 39 (2001) 955±968 www.elsevier.com/locate/toxicon An analysis of geographic and intersexual chemical variation in venoms of the spider Tegenaria agrestis (Agelenidae) G.J. Binford* Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA Received 31 August 2000; accepted 24 October 2000 Abstract The spider Tegenaria agrestis is native to Europe, where it is considered medically innocuous. This species recently colonized the US where it has been accused of bites that result in necrotic lesions and systemic effects in humans. One possible explanation of this pattern is the US spiders have unique venom characteristics. This study compares whole venoms from US and European populations to look for unique US characteristics, and to increase our understanding of venom variability within species. This study compared venoms from T. agrestis males and females from Marysville, Washington (US), Tungstead Quarry, England (UK) and Le Landeron, Switzerland, by means of liquid chromatography; and the US and UK populations by insect bioassays. Chromatographic pro®les were different between sexes, but similar within sexes between US and UK populations. Venoms from the Swiss population differed subtly in composition from UK and US venoms. No peaks were unique to the US population. Intersexual differences were primarily in relative abundance of components. Insect assays revealed no differences between US and UK venom potency, but female venoms were more potent than male. These results are dif®cult to reconcile with claims of necrotic effects that are unique to venoms of US Tegenaria. q 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: Spider; Venom; Variation; Population; Sex; Comparative 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Taxonomy and Distribution of the Spider Genus Phryganoporus Simon (Araneae: Amaurobioidea: Desidae)
    © Copyright Australian Museum, 2002 Records of the Australian Museum (2002) Vol. 54: 275–292. ISSN 0067-1975 The Taxonomy and Distribution of the Spider Genus Phryganoporus Simon (Araneae: Amaurobioidea: Desidae) MICHAEL R. GRAY Australian Museum, 6 College Street, Sydney NSW 2010, Australia [email protected] ABSTRACT. The widely distributed Australian desid spider genus, Phryganoporus Simon, is taxonomically reviewed and validated. Phryganoporus nigrinus is removed from synonymy with P. candidus, while Amaurobius gausapatus, P. g. occidentalis and P. tubicola are synonyms of P. candidus. The species recognised here belong to two clades, [P. candidus (L. Koch), Phryganoporus vandiemeni (Gray) n.comb.] and [P. nigrinus Simon, P. davidleei n.sp., P. melanopygus n.sp.]. These clades are distinguished by the possession of a divided or entire cribellum and genitalic characters. Distribution maps and notes on relationships are given. GRAY, MICHAEL R., 2002. The taxonomy and distribution of the spider genus Phryganoporus Simon (Araneae: Amaurobioidea: Desidae). Records of the Australian Museum 54(3): 275–292. Spiders of the genus Phryganoporus are cribellate web opportunist scavengers and predators. Most non-territorial, builders that are distributed throughout Australia. They build communal interaction (collective nest construction and webs on low vegetation and their abundant white hair cover cleaning, prey capture and feeding) took place between probably helps reduce body heating, particularly for spiders individuals below the subadult stage. Such communal occupying exposed webs in semi-arid to arid regions. interaction is probably a consequence of pheromone While the species described here are typically solitary, mediated sibling tolerance and is not regarded as true one species, P.
    [Show full text]
  • Spiders 27 November-5 December 2018 Submitted: August 2019 Robert Raven
    Bush Blitz – Namadgi, ACT 27 Nov-5 Dec 2018 Namadgi, ACT Bush Blitz Spiders 27 November-5 December 2018 Submitted: August 2019 Robert Raven Nomenclature and taxonomy used in this report is consistent with: The Australian Faunal Directory (AFD) http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/abrs/online-resources/fauna/afd/home Page 1 of 12 Bush Blitz – Namadgi, ACT 27 Nov-5 Dec 2018 Contents Contents .................................................................................................................................. 2 List of contributors ................................................................................................................... 2 Abstract ................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 4 2. Methods .......................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Site selection ............................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Survey techniques ..................................................................................................... 4 2.2.1 Methods used at standard survey sites ................................................................... 5 2.3 Identifying the collections .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Research Article
    z Available online at http://www.journalcra.com INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CURRENT RESEARCH International Journal of Current Research Vol. 11, Issue, 06, pp.4750-4756, June, 2019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24941/ijcr.35599.06.2019 ISSN: 0975-833X RESEARCH ARTICLE COURTSHIP AND REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION IN TWO CLOSELY RELATED DESID SPIDERS, BADUMNA LONGINQUA AND BADUMNA INSIGNIS (ARANEIDAE: DESIDAE) *1Marianne W. Robertson and 2Dr. Peter H. Adler 1Department of Biology, Millikin University, Decatur, IL 62522 2Department of Entomology, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634 ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article History: We studied the development and reproductive behavior of two sympatric New Zealand spiders, Received 18th March, 2019 Badumna longinqua and Badumna insignis (Araneae: Desidae), in the laboratory. Both species have Received in revised form intersexual size dimorphism and, within each species, males vary up to 35-fold in size. Females of B. 24th April, 2019 longinqua produce up to 12 egg sacs, and those of B. insignis produce up to 18 sacs. Clutch size and Accepted 23rd May, 2019 number of egg sacs is positively correlated with adult female longevity, but not female weight, in both Published online 30th June, 2019 species. Courtship in B. longinqua is longer and entails more acts than in B. insignis. Both species exhibit prolonged copulation. The number of palpal insertions during copulation is not correlated with Key Words: clutch size, length of sperm storage, female longevity, male weight, or female weight in either Development, Courtship, species, but number of insertions is positively correlated with relative male weight in B. longinqua Copulation, Reproductive Isolation, and time until first oviposition in B.
    [Show full text]