DOCSLIB.ORG

A Study Guide by Robert Lewis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

© ATOM 2016 A STUDY GUIDE BY ROBERT LEWIS http://www.metromagazine.com.au ISBN: 978-1-74295-976-4 http://theeducationshop.com.au OVERVIEW Howard on Menzies (Simon Nasht, 2016), is a 2x57 minute documentary series about Australia’s longest-serving Prime Minister, Sir Robert Menzies, and the creation of post-war Australia. It is presented as an investigation by the second-longest serving Prime Minister and fellow Liberal Party member, John Howard, and is his exploration of the question: What did Menzies contribute to the development of modern Australia? Was the Menzies period, as former Prime Minister Paul Keating claimed, the ‘lost’ decades? Or did Menzies establish the basis of Australia’s post-war affluence and development? This is history told from the inside, from one master of the political game about another. Many of the situations faced by Menzies were also faced by Howard, and his personal insights provide a unique insight into the dynamics at play. Howard has a case to make for Menzies, but he is generous in including the voices and perspectives of prominent Menzies’ critics. CONTENT HYPERLINKS 3 BEFORE WATCHING THE FILM 18 IS HOWARD ON MENZIES AN EFFECTIVE DOCUMENTARY? 3 CURRICULUM APPLICABILITY 19 APPENDIX 1: ANALYSING MENZIES’ 8 EXPLORING IDEAS AND FIRST ‘FORGOTTEN PEOPLE’ TALK ISSUES IN THE FILM 22 APPENDIX 2: © ATOM 2016 © ATOM 9 EPISODE 1 MENZIES’ ELECTION RESULTS 14 EPISODE 2 22 MORE INFORMATION 2 BEFORE WATCHING THE FILM 1. Image study • Which is the most critical image? Explain why you chose that one. You probably know very little about Sir Robert Menzies, who • Which is the most sympathetic of flattering one? was Prime Minister from 1939-41, and 1949-63. He died in Explain why you chose that one. 1978. He was a controversial character, and there are de- • what is your overall impression of Robert Menzies from bates about his legacy — how effective a prime minister he these representations? was, and whether he helped shape modern Australia. • Why might artists have such different attitudes towards him? 1.1 Look at the artistic representations of Robert Menzies • Why do you think he might have been a controversial on pages 4, 5 and 6 (which can include paintings, car- and divisive character? toons, busts, figurines and photographs). They were made by a variety of people over different periods of time. For each discuss: Curriculum Applicability • What does it show? Howard on Menzies is relevant for senior students • What immediate impression do you get? (years 10-12) of: • Why do you get that impression — that is, what fea- tures or aspects of the artwork lead you to have that • Australian history (post-war Australia reaction? 1945-1965) • Politics 1.2 Write one or two words under each to summarise what • English (biography) it tells you about Menzies. • Media studies (the documentary form) • Art (including portraiture, and cartooning) 2016 © ATOM 1.3 At the end decide: 3 Back to page 3 William Dobell (1960) courtesy Art Gallery of NSW Unknown photographer (1963) courtesy National Portrait Gallery A B Ivor Hele (1954) courtesy Parliament House Canberra John Frith (1939) courtesy Australian War Memorial 2016 © ATOM C D 4 Back to page 3 Noel Counihan (1955) courtesy megaslides.com E Artist unknown (1951) courtesy National Library of Australia F © ATOM 2016 © ATOM Victor Greenhalgh (1962) courtesy National Portrait Gallery G 5 Back to page 3 Courtesy Menzies Virtual Museum Les Tanner and Gus McLaren (1970) courtesy National Portrait Gallery Les Tanner (1966) courtesy National Portrait Gallery H I J William Dobell (1960) courtesy National Portrait Gallery John Spooner (2004) courtesy National Library of Australia 2016 © ATOM K L 6 2. Creating a biography You are about to find out information about Robert his qualities, and so on. Add any more, and then put them Menzies. Think about what you would need to know to in this table in a logical sequence that helps you trace his understand a famous person and to follow their life. life. As you learn more about Menzies through watching Howard on Menzies, summarise what you learn in this 2.1 Create a table of these questions. For example, you table. You may find that the documentary also raises new would include when he was born, where, something about questions or issues to explore. Add these as they arise. his parents, some influences on the person, his education, ASPECT OF HIS LIFE/QUESTIONS WHAT I HAVE DISCOVERED © ATOM 2016 © ATOM 7 EXPLORING IDEAS AND ISSUES IN THE FILM As you watch Howard on Menzies the key aspects to focus on are: • What does it tell you about Menzies as a person? • Was he, as some claim, a drag on Australia, or • How did Menzies become Prime Minister? did his achievements help the development of • What did he achieve as Prime Minister? Australia? • What impact did his policies and actions have on • Is this documentary an effective one? Australia? At the end you will have developed answers to all these aspects. © ATOM 2016 © ATOM 8 Episode 1 1 Understanding the debate 3 Menzies as Prime Minister 1939-1941 about Menzies (Part 1 00:00-02:50) (Part 1 06:40-15:40) This is a film that will critically examine the influence 3.1 Menzies became Prime Minister in 1939. What prob- and achievements of a political leader. lems did he face? In the first 3 minutes we are given a brief overview of 3.2 In 1939 Menzies had to take the life and death decision the two main attitudes towards Menzies and his period of going into war. Howard talks about his own decision over of leadership of the nation as Prime Minister. 70 years later to send Australian troops to war. Do you think this interruption in the story of Menzies to focus on Howard 1.1 Briefly summarise the two attitudes towards is useful and helpful in understanding Menzies? Explain your Menzies. reasons. 1.2 What does former Prime Minister say his intention 3.4 In 1941 Menzies visited Britain. At this time the state in the film is? of the war was – Britain the only European nation still standing against Hitler, major cities being bombed nightly, 1.3 What would you expect from the film for it to be enemy warplanes attacking daily to shoot the British aerial convincing? For example, who should be asked to defences out of the sky to allow an invasion force to land comment? What events should be focused on? How by sea. What impact does this have on him? should ideas and comments be presented? 3.5 How was Australia’s security tied to the survival of 1.4 Add any information to your Menzies biography. Britain? 2 Menzies as a person 3.6 Why did he go to Britain? (Part 1 02:50–06:40) 3.7 What was his mission? The opening few minutes also give us information about Menzies in the years before 1949. 3.8 What was the outcome? 2.1 What do you learn about Menzies as a young 3.9 What impact did the visit make on him? person? 3.10 What point does the film make about the conflict of 2.2 What are key features of his personality? loyalties between Menzies’ British Empire loyalty and his responsibility for the defence of Australia? © ATOM 2016 © ATOM 2.3 What does the footage show of his political style? 3.11 Add any information to your Menzies biography. 2.4 Add any information to your Menzies biography. 9 5.6 Classroom activity: analysing The Forgotten People This part of the documentary focuses on Menzies’ series of 1942 talks, The Forgotten People. These talks revealed the ideas and the strategy that would create the Liberal Party, and lead Menzies to victory at six successive elections (see Appendix 2 for these results). Look at Appendix 1 to see the text of the first of these talks, and use the questions accompanying this text to analyse what Menzies was saying. Menzies failed again in 1945 election, but won in 1949, thanks to Labor Prime Minister Ben Chifley’s mistakes. 5.7 How did Chifley’s attempt to nationalise the banks play into Menzies’ hands? 5.8 What was the nature of the choice at the 1949 4 How he responded to this defeat election? (Part 1 15:40-18:40) 5.9 Add any information to your Menzies 4.1 What happened within Menzies’ party back in biography. Australia? 4.2 Here again we see an interruption or aside to the Menzies story when Howard talks about his own early political defeat. Is this an effective device in helping us understand and empathise with Menzies? 4.3 We then learn more about his background. Go back to your biographical profile and add any information. 5 Menzies returns to power (Part 1 18:40-33:30) A key element now is a discussion of how he learned from his defeat, and what he started to do to build for future success. He was recalled as leader again after the disas- trous results for the UAP in 1943. He agreed, on condition that he was free to structure a new party, which became the Liberal Party. 5.1 Menzies identified and appealed to the ‘forgotten peo- ple’. Who were they, and what were their values? 5.2 Why had they been previously ignored? 5.3 Menzies needed a party machine to enable him to win power. How did he create it? 5.4 What were its guiding principles that set it apart from others? © ATOM 2016 © ATOM 5.5 How was its appeal to women important? 10 5.10 Classroom activity: analysing a cartoon representation of the election.
Recommended publications
  • Politics, Power and Protest in the Vietnam War Era

    Politics, Power and Protest in the Vietnam War Era

    Chapter 6 POLITICS, POWER AND PROTEST IN THE VIETNAM WAR ERA In 1962 the Australian government, led by Sir Robert Menzies, sent a group of 30 military advisers to Vietnam. The decision to become Photograph showing an anti-war rally during the 1960s. involved in a con¯ict in Vietnam began one of Australia's involvement in the Vietnam War led to the largest the most controversial eras in Australia's protest movement we had ever experienced. history. It came at a time when the world was divided between nations that were INQUIRY communist and those that were not; when · How did the Australian government respond to the communism was believed to be a real threat to threat of communism after World War II? capitalist societies such as the United States · Why did Australia become involved in the Vietnam War? and Australia. · How did various groups respond to Australia's The Menzies government put great effort into involvement in the Vietnam War? linking Australia to United States foreign · What was the impact of the war on Australia and/ policy in the Asia-Paci®c region. With the or neighbouring countries? communist revolution in China in 1949, the invasion of South Korea by communist North A student: Korea in 1950, and the con¯ict in Vietnam, 5.1 explains social, political and cultural Australia looked increasingly to the United developments and events and evaluates their States to contain communism in this part of the impact on Australian life world. The war in Vietnam engulfed the 5.2 assesses the impact of international events and relationships on Australia's history Indochinese region and mobilised hundreds of 5.3 explains the changing rights and freedoms of thousands of people in a global protest against Aboriginal peoples and other groups in Australia the horror of war.
  • Australian Political Elites and Citizenship Education for `New Australians' 1945-1960

    Australian Political Elites and Citizenship Education for `New Australians' 1945-1960

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Sydney eScholarship Australian Political Elites and Citizenship Education for `New Australians' 1945-1960 Patricia Anne Bernadette Jenkings Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, University of Sydney MAY 2001 In memory of Bill Jenkings, my father, who gave me the courage and inspiration to persevere TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF CONTENTS........................................................................... i ABSTRACT................................................................................................................ iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................. vi ABBREVIATIONS..................................................................................................vii LIST OF TABLES ..................................................................................................viii LIST OF FIGURES................................................................................................. ix INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................... 1 Theoretical Orientation ................................................................................... 9 Methodological Framework.......................................................................... 19 CHAPTER ONE-POLITICAL ELITES, POST-WAR IMMIGRATION AND THE QUESTION OF CITIZENSHIP .... 28 Introduction........................................................................................................
  • The Legacy of Robert Menzies in the Liberal Party of Australia

    The Legacy of Robert Menzies in the Liberal Party of Australia

    PASSING BY: THE LEGACY OF ROBERT MENZIES IN THE LIBERAL PARTY OF AUSTRALIA A study of John Gorton, Malcolm Fraser and John Howard Sophie Ellen Rose 2012 'A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of BA (Hons) in History, University of Sydney'. 1 Acknowledgements Firstly, I would like to acknowledge the guidance of my supervisor, Dr. James Curran. Your wisdom and insight into the issues I was considering in my thesis was invaluable. Thank you for your advice and support, not only in my honours’ year but also throughout the course of my degree. Your teaching and clear passion for Australian political history has inspired me to pursue a career in politics. Thank you to Nicholas Eckstein, the 2012 history honours coordinator. Your remarkable empathy, understanding and good advice throughout the year was very much appreciated. I would also like to acknowledge the library staff at the National Library of Australia in Canberra, who enthusiastically and tirelessly assisted me in my collection of sources. Thank you for finding so many boxes for me on such short notice. Thank you to the Aspinall Family for welcoming me into your home and supporting me in the final stages of my thesis and to my housemates, Meg MacCallum and Emma Thompson. Thank you to my family and my friends at church. Thank you also to Daniel Ward for your unwavering support and for bearing with me through the challenging times. Finally, thanks be to God for sustaining me through a year in which I faced many difficulties and for providing me with the support that I needed.
  • Corona GOVERNANCE

    Corona GOVERNANCE

    CORONA STIMULUS & RECOVERY © SERIES REPORT # 2 N A T I O N A L G O V E R N A N C E E F F E C T I V E N E S S in line with ACCEPTED BUDGETTING, PLANNING & ENGAGEMENT PROTOCOLS ROBERT GIBBONS 18 NOVEMBER 2020 © see copyright statement on last page INTRODUCTION Bubonic Plague hit Sydney, Brisbane and Melbourne in 1900 and the Sydney response was the world’s most famous, the “social laboratory of the world”. Governance was key to that response, medicine was supportive. 120 years later the Novel Coronavirus thence COVID-19 was mayhem, warnings had been ignored and Australia was sliding backwards economically. There is supposed to be a self-correcting mechanism called “budget repair” when a government finds it mismanaged bushfires and rorts so that the next one would be better planned and organised. The opposite happened, repair (MYEFO) was cancelled, delays became critical, mistakes abounded as the “Canberra Bubble” did not know how to prepare a “plan” as I had done in 2 days when BHP announced the closure of steelmaking in Newcastle in 1997. The States pushed PM Morrison into setting up a cooperative National Cabinet on 13 March 2020. It emerged from the Canberra Bubble without any explanation of logic, objectives, modus operandi or budget, and this analyst predicted it would fail as soon as a member’s self-interest clashed with the collective view – and that was a safe bet as NSW’s Premier, Glady Berejiklian, is an habitual renegade and regularly attacks her peers. It has been under the control of the PM’s department head who has a NSW reputation for negative practices (he used to report to Berejiklian).
  • Timbuckleyieefa DIRTY POWER BIG COAL's NETWORK of INFLUENCE OVER the COALITION GOVERNMENT CONTENTS

    Timbuckleyieefa DIRTY POWER BIG COAL's NETWORK of INFLUENCE OVER the COALITION GOVERNMENT CONTENTS

    ICAC investigation: Lobbying, Access and Influence (Op Eclipse) Submission 2 From: Tim Buckley To: Lobbying Subject: THE REGULATION OF LOBBYING, ACCESS AND INFLUENCE IN NSW: A CHANCE TO HAVE YOUR SAY Date: Thursday, 16 May 2019 2:01:39 PM Attachments: Mav2019-GPAP-Dirtv-Power-Report.Ddf Good afternoon I am delighted that the NSW ICAC is looking again into the issue of lobbying and undue access by lobbyists representing self-serving, private special interest groups, and the associated lack of transparency. This is most needed when it relates to the private (often private, foreign tax haven based entities with zero transparency or accountability), use of public assets. IEEFA works in the public interest analysis relating to the energy-fmance-climate space, and so we regularly see the impact of the fossil fuel sector in particular as one that thrives on the ability to privatise the gains for utilising one-time use public assets and in doing so, externalising the costs onto the NSW community. This process is constantly repeated. The community costs, be they in relation to air, particulate and carbon pollution, plus the use of public water, and failure to rehabilitate sites post mining, brings a lasting community cost, particularly in the area of public health costs. The cost-benefit analysis presented to the IPC is prepared by the proponent, who has an ability to present biased self-serving analysis that understates the costs and overstates the benefits. To my understanding, the revolving door of regulators, politicians, fossil fuel companies and their lobbyists is corrosive to our democracy, undermining integrity and fairness.
  • Menzies and Howard on Themselves: Liberal Memoir, Memory and Myth Making

    Menzies and Howard on Themselves: Liberal Memoir, Memory and Myth Making

    University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Law, Humanities and the Arts - Papers Faculty of Arts, Social Sciences & Humanities 1-1-2018 Menzies and Howard on themselves: Liberal memoir, memory and myth making Zachary Gorman University of Wollongong, [email protected] Gregory C. Melleuish University of Wollongong, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/lhapapers Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons, and the Law Commons Recommended Citation Gorman, Zachary and Melleuish, Gregory C., "Menzies and Howard on themselves: Liberal memoir, memory and myth making" (2018). Faculty of Law, Humanities and the Arts - Papers. 3442. https://ro.uow.edu.au/lhapapers/3442 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Menzies and Howard on themselves: Liberal memoir, memory and myth making Abstract This article compares the memoirs of Sir Robert Menzies and John Howard, as well as Howard's book on Menzies, examining what these works by the two most successful Liberal prime ministers indicate about the evolution of the Liberal Party's liberalism. Howard's memoirs are far more 'political', candid and ideologically engaged than those of Menzies. Howard acknowledges that politics is about political power and winning it, while Menzies was more concerned with the political leader as statesman. Howard's works can be viewed as a continuation of the 'history wars'. He wishes to create a Liberal tradition to match that of the Labor Party. Disciplines Arts and Humanities | Law Publication Details Gorman, Z.
  • The Sir Robert Menzies Oration on Higher Education

    The Sir Robert Menzies Oration on Higher Education

    Professor Peter McPhee Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic) University of Melbourne Faces in the Crowd? The ‘Melbourne Experience’ past, present, future The TheSir Sir RobertRobert Menzies OrationMenzies on Higher Education Oration on Higher Education1 About the Orator Peter McPhee is Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic), with particular responsibilities for the quality of teaching and learning and the ‘Melbourne Experience’. Professor McPhee was educated at Colac High School, Caulfield Grammar School, and the University of Melbourne, where he completed a BA (Hons 1st Class), Dip.Ed., MA (Hons 1st Class) and PhD. He taught at La Trobe University 1975-79 and the Victoria University of Wellington 1980-86 before returning to the University of Melbourne, where he has held a Personal Chair in History since 1993. He has published widely on the history of modern France, notably A Social History of France 1780-1880 (London, 1992) and Revolution and Environment in Southern France, 1780-1830 (Oxford, 1999). In 1999 he also published a biography of the former Chancellor Roy Douglas (‘Pansy’) Wright. His most recent book is The French Revolution 1789-1799 (Oxford, 2002). Professor McPhee was Deputy Dean and Acting Dean of the School of Graduate Studies in 1994-96, then Head of the Department of History in 1996-99. He was elected a Fellow of the Australian Academy of the Humanities in 1997. In the same year he became an inaugural ‘Universitas 21’ Teaching Fellow. In 2003 he was elected a Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, and awarded a Centenary Medal for sevices to education. He was an Officer of the Academic Board 1999-2003 and its President in 2002-03.
  • Precis-2015-Web.Pdf

    Precis-2015-Web.Pdf

    Goals and Aims Goals and Aims The Centre for Independent Studies (CIS) The CIS promotes: is Australia’s leading independent public • individual liberty and choice, including freedom policy research think tank. of association, religion, speech and the right to Founded in 1976, the CIS has been a property long-standing advocate for the market • an economy based on free markets economy and a free civil society under • democratic government under the rule of law a democratic government. The CIS • an autonomous and free civil society. promotes a strong civil society in which liberty is paramount, families and education are valued, economic freedom The CIS and its research are: and property rights are assured, and • funded by private donations — from individuals, individual responsibility and initiative companies, charitable trusts and foundations are encouraged. — as well as subscriptions, events and book sales Through a rigorous research program • politically non-partisan and wide-ranging event activities, the • driven by the Executive Director and the research CIS encourages serious debate among team. The CIS does not undertake commissioned academics, politicians, media and research. stakeholders with the aim of assisting in the formulation and development of evidence-based policy recommendations for Australia’s future prosperity and wellbeing. Independence is of utmost importance to us. 1 From the Executive Director As we head into 2016 we’ll be approaching our 40th birthday. As you might expect, as the Centre’s founder, I find myself reflecting on the long term role of the CIS in the public arena and what 40 years has achieved. There are frustrations of course.
  • The Leader of the Opposition

    The Leader of the Opposition

    The Leader of the Opposition ‘…just as there can be no good or stable government without a sound majority, so there will be a dictatorial government unless there is the constant criticism of an intelligent, active, and critical opposition.’ –Sir Robert Menzies, 1948 The practice in Australia is for the leader of the party or coalition that can secure a majority in the House of Representatives to be appointed as Prime Minister. The leader of the largest party or Hon. Dr. H.V. Evatt coalition outside the government serves as Leader of the Opposition. Leader of the Opposition 1951 - 1960 The Leader of the Opposition is his or her party’s candidate for Prime National Library of Australia Minister at a general election. Each party has its own internal rules for the election of a party leader. Since 1967, the Leader of the Opposition has appointed a Shadow Ministry which offers policy alternatives and criticism on various portfolios. The Leader of the Opposition is, by convention, always a member of the House of Representatives and sits opposite the Prime Minister in the chamber. The Senate leader of the opposition party is referred to as the Leader of the Opposition in the Senate, even if they lead a majority of Senators. He or she usually has a senior Shadow Ministry role. Australia has an adversarial parliamentary system in which the Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition face off against one another during debates in the House of Representatives. The Opposition’s role is to hold the government accountable to the people and to Parliament, as well as to provide alternative policies in a range of areas.
  • The Case Against an Australian Bill of Rights

    The Case Against an Australian Bill of Rights

    Don’t Leave Us with the Bill: The Case Against an Australian Bill of Rights Edited by Julian Leeser and Ryan Haddrick Don’t Leave Us with the Bill The Case Against an Australian Bill of Rights Edited by Julian Leeser and Ryan Haddrick Published by The Menzies Research Centre Limited RG Menzies House Cnr Blackall and Macquarie Streets BARTON, ACT 2600 ISBN 978-0-9806383-0-1 The Menzies Research Centre Limited is a company limited by guarantee ACN 067 379 684. The Menzies Research Centre is supported by a grant from the Commonwealth Department of Finance and Deregulation The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Directors or staff of The Menzies Research Centre. © 2009 The Menzies Research Centre Project management and production: QOTE Canberra (02) 6162 1258 iii Foreword THE RT HON SIR NINIAN ST EPHEN , KG, AK, GCMG, GCVO, KBE, QC he expression ‘a bill of rights’ has an immediate attraction to it; to be subject to such a measure seems at first sight inherently desirable, just the kind of legislative measure a freedom loving nation would Taspire to. Only with experience of the operation of such measures do doubts arise. The true measure of those doubts lies in the assumption, inherent in any such measure, that at a given moment in time it is possible once and for all to identify and declare, both for now and for the future, all those rights which citizens should desirably possess, secure in the knowledge that such a declaration will serve all future needs of the community.
  • Sir John Mcewen, PC, GCMG, CH Prime Minister 19 December 1967 to 10 January 1968

    Sir John Mcewen, PC, GCMG, CH Prime Minister 19 December 1967 to 10 January 1968

    18 Sir John McEWEN, PC, GCMG, CH Prime Minister 19 December 1967 to 10 January 1968 McEwen became the 18th prime minister after serving as leader of the Country Party in the coalition government since 1958. He assumed a caretaker role after the disappearance of Harold Holt. Member of the Country Party of Australia. Member of the House of Representatives 1934-1971. Held seat of Echuca 1934-37, Indi 1937-49 and Murray 1949-71. Joined parliamentary Country Party 1934-1971. Minister of the Interior 1937-39, External Affairs 1940, Air and Civil Aviation in 1940-41, Commerce and Agriculture 1949-56, Trade 1956-63, Trade and Industry 1963-71. McEwen ceased to be prime minister when Liberal Party senator, John Gorton, won a ballot of Liberal parliamentarians on 9 January 1968. Main achievements (1937-1968) Minister in the Cabinets of five heads of government. Member of Australian Advisory War Council 1940-1945. Member of Australia’s delegation to conference to establish United Nations 1945. Held key trade and commerce portfolios for 20 years. Developed influential international networks in business and government. Led numerous trade delegations including negotiation of controversial Australia-Japan trade agreement 1957, six years after peace treaty signed with Japan. Linked Australia’s trade to its capacity to fight Communism during Vietnam War. Personal life Born 29 March 1900 in Chiltern, Victoria. Died 20 November 1980 in Toorak, Melbourne. Raised by grandmother in Wangaratta then Dandenong after the death of mother in 1901 and father in 1907. Educated at Wangaratta state school 1907-1913. Left school at 13 to work at pharmaceutical company.
  • Quiet Achievers the New Zealand Path to Reform 2 Quiet Achievers the New Zealand Path to Reform 3

    Quiet Achievers the New Zealand Path to Reform 2 Quiet Achievers the New Zealand Path to Reform 3

    The New Zealand path to reform 1 QUIET ACHIEVERS THE NEW ZEALAND PatH TO REFORM 2 Quiet Achievers The New Zealand path to reform 3 QUIET ACHIEVERS THE NEW ZE A L an D P A TH TO REFORM Oliver Hartwich Connor Court Publishing 4 Quiet Achievers Connor Court Publishing Pty Ltd Copyright © Oliver Hartwich 2014 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. This book contains material protected under International and Federal Copyright Laws and Treaties. Any unauthorised reprint or use of this material is prohibited. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system without express written permission from the publisher. PO Box 224W Ballarat VIC 3350 [email protected] www.connorcourt.com ISBN: 9781925138429 (pbk.) Cover design by Ian James Printed in Australia The New Zealand path to reform 5 ‘The prime art of politics is that of a persuasion which cuts deep into the popular mind and heart.’ Sir Robert Gordon Menzies 6 Quiet Achievers The R. G. Menzies Essays The R. G. Menzies Essays is an occasional series of monographs commissioned by the Menzies Research Centre as a reasoned con- tribution to the formation of enlightened policy. Correspondence is welcome and will be considered for publication in future volumes. Series Editor: Nick Cater Series Publisher: Connor Court The Menzies Research Centre The Menzies Research Centre is dedicated to the improvement of public policy through the application of the enduring liberal principles of freedom, enterprise reason and opportunity. The MRC is non-profit organisation funded by public grants and private philanthropy.