The Sir Robert Menzies Oration on Higher Education

Professor Peter McPhee Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic) University of Melbourne Faces in the Crowd? The ‘Melbourne Experience’ past, present, future The TheSir Sir RobertRobert Menzies OrationMenzies on Higher Education Oration on Higher Education1 About the Orator Peter McPhee is Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic), with particular responsibilities for the quality of teaching and learning and the ‘Melbourne Experience’. Professor McPhee was educated at Colac High School, Caulfield Grammar School, and the University of Melbourne, where he completed a BA (Hons 1st Class), Dip.Ed., MA (Hons 1st Class) and PhD. He taught at La Trobe University 1975-79 and the Victoria University of Wellington 1980-86 before returning to the University of Melbourne, where he has held a Personal Chair in History since 1993. He has published widely on the history of modern France, notably A Social History of France 1780-1880 (London, 1992) and Revolution and Environment in Southern France, 1780-1830 (Oxford, 1999). In 1999 he also published a biography of the former Chancellor Roy Douglas (‘Pansy’) Wright. His most recent book is The French Revolution 1789-1799 (Oxford, 2002). Professor McPhee was Deputy Dean and Acting Dean of the School of Graduate Studies in 1994-96, then Head of the Department of History in 1996-99. He was elected a Fellow of the Australian Academy of the Humanities in 1997. In the same year he became an inaugural ‘Universitas 21’ Teaching Fellow. In 2003 he was elected a Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, and awarded a Centenary Medal for sevices to education. He was an Officer of the Academic Board 1999-2003 and its President in 2002-03. He took up his current position in October 2003. In 1978 the Sir Robert Menzies Memorial Trust was formed and its public appeal raised $6.2 million. The funds were invested and a non-political, not-for-profit organisation called the Sir Robert Menzies Memorial Foundation was established in 1979. Since then, the Menzies Foundation has expended approximately $20 million from its investment income on a program that includes: • the establishment of the Menzies School of Health Research, Darwin; • the establishment of the Menzies Research Institute, Hobart; • the creation of the Menzies Virtual Museum web site, www.menziesvirtualmuseum.org.au; • the funding of post-graduate scholarships in the fields of medicine, allied health sciences and law ; • the sponsorship of grants, seminars and lectures on public health related themes; • the sponsorship of the Sir Robert Menzies Oration on Higher Education; • support for the Menzies Centre for Australian Studies in London; • support for the Menzies Memorial Scholars’ Association; • the restoration and maintenance of “Clarendon Terrace”, East Melbourne. For further details visit www.menziesfoundation.org.au The Menzies Foundation “Clarendon Terrace” 210 Clarendon Street East Melbourne Vic 3002 Telephone: 03 9419 5699 Facsimile: 03 9417 7049 [email protected], “Faces in the Crowd? The ‘Melbourne Experience’ past, present, future” The Sir Robert Menzies Oration on Higher Education Peter McPhee1 19 October 2005 In 2003 we celebrated the 150th anniversary of the professors, mostly of British background, who were often founding of the University, and in April 1855, 150 years adept at oratory but with little experience in research or ago this year, the University opened its doors to students. its popularisation. They relied on well-worn lecture notes We had a far better staff:student ratio in those days and jokes: indeed, students knew from those who were – there were three staff and 16 students (today our ratio is repeating the subject precisely which joke would be told 1:18) – but whereas today about 90 per cent of those who and when. Some lecturers dismayed a Tasmanian student complete first year go on to graduate, only four of the 16 who began his studies here in 1925, Roy Douglas Wright, who began in 1855 finally did so. soon known as ‘Pansy’. It was, reflected Wright in later life, ‘a sad little university’, the professors ‘punch-drunk’ Let us move forward 70 years, to 1925, when far fewer from having to cover so much curriculum with little than one in 10 Australian children completed secondary support.3 school, and almost all who did were from private schools. The offspring of wealthy families often felt no particular Change was in the air, however, at least in the nature of urgency to complete degrees; for others, particularly undergraduate life. While there had been a lively Public the tiny minority of children from state schools, it Questions Society since the end of World War I, the title was a privileged and exciting world of learning. There of its publication, Both Sides, indicated a pluralism which were fewer than 2,000 students, only one-quarter of the more engagé found unsatisfying. In April 1925 Brian whom were women, just 160 professors, lecturers and Fitzpatrick, like Wright a bright state-school boy, became demonstrators. From its origins, Melbourne had been chief-of-staff of the new student newspaper Farrago. A characterised by a commitment to the liberal ideal of Labour Club was founded in the same year by Fitzpatrick, disinterested learning but also by a recognition of its Ralph Gibson, Macmahon Ball and others; Joan Finlason function as a trainer of professionals. Indeed, the epithet and Kathleen Pitt were among the women members, then most commonly used for the university—’the and were also Farrago editors. Almost immediately an Shop’—suggests a popular assumption of students opposition Liberal Club was formed by Ian Maxwell and choosing from a selection of degrees in return for high Wilfred Kent-Hughes.4 fees. In later life, Kathleen Pitt, now Fitzpatrick – she had been The University was utterly derivative in its scholarship: married to Brian Fitzpatrick – recalled that: its teaching staff relied on British books and journals— When I entered the University of Melbourne in 1923 far less commonly European or American—for their the campus was the same size as it is now, but in knowledge. Staff and students shared an assumption those days it seemed much larger because one’s that real learning emanated from England. In the words general impression was of a few buildings scattered of Kathleen Pitt, who completed her studies in 1925, through a large park. In the middle there was a rather ‘there were exciting prospects ahead, because while I romantic lake, fringed with reeds and pampas grass, was taking my degree in absentia Mother, my sister and haunted by birds and student couples engaged in brother and I were all aboard the good ship Nestor, bound flirtation or courting. Into its shallow waters the more for Europe, where it was the parental design that our boisterous students occasionally threw those of their colonial rough surfaces should be filed and polished, our fellows who gave them offence. … The water-supply academic education furthered and our serious education was poor and no attempt was made to water parks 2 begun.’ Pedagogy was centred on lectures from the in the summer, when the great extent of grass in the The Sir Robert Menzies Oration on Higher Education 3 Smith remembered that ‘within a few months in 1945 my father had signed me up in the Frankston branch of the Liberal Party, Geoffrey Serle had got me into the University Labor Club and through that into the Australian Labor Party, and Ian Turner and Jeanette Noye (later Jeanette Love) had persuaded me … to join the Communist Party.7 For Peter Blazey, likewise, ‘My first year [1959] was a delirium of joining. … I sniffed around the student newspaper Farrago, and for a bit of rude health joined the daggy Mountaineering Club. … My first club was the Arts Association, an effete group of beleaguered Arts males (several of whom were obviously gay). We went on outings, read poetry and put out a quarterly poetry magazine called Hashish.’8 Blazey was a contemporary of Jack Hibberd, a medical student starting to find that his distinctive humour and prose were more suited to play-writing. His essay is the best recollection we have of student life at Melbourne: The Cafeteria teemed with lost souls, the foyer of the Union with the captains of clubs and societies. The Melbourne University Film Society stall was manned by myopics (who affected duffel-coats draped over their shoulders), that of the Rationalist Society by lechers and sots. The representatives of the theatre societies, with their flute-pure vowels, corduroy suits and silk cravats, were enough to put you off theatre for life, even off life itself. … In first year Medicine cliques were particularly strong, Kate Fitzpatrick c 1960 structured around schools and social status. I’d never before met chaps who skied and rowed, who university grounds became as dry and brown as it still summered at Portsea and wintered in the Alps. I had does on the Western Plains in a season of drought. spent a few weeks at Rosebud and Lilydale. The University of Melbourne in my student days was First year seemed dominated by the alumni of a small establishment, with two thousand students Melbourne Grammar and Scotch College. They stuck and few amenities: there was no Union, no theatre, together like notes in a Swiss band.9 no bookroom, no bank and little to eat except sandwiches and pies and cakes with pink icing. [Male Rita Ehrlich recalled with affection ‘an innocent time: and female students ate in separate lounges.] The 1966. We still dressed up to go to classes. The girls size of the academic staff was drawn to scale and an wore dresses or skirts, not jeans, and we still wore arts department usually consisted of a professor, one stockings.

Load more