Orthodox Christians Under Ottoman Rule, 1400-1550 Neil Paradise University of North Florida
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
University of North Florida UNF Digital Commons All Volumes (2001-2008) The sprO ey Journal of Ideas and Inquiry 2006 In the Lion’s Den: Orthodox Christians under Ottoman Rule, 1400-1550 Neil Paradise University of North Florida Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unf.edu/ojii_volumes Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Suggested Citation Paradise, Neil, "In the Lion’s Den: Orthodox Christians under Ottoman Rule, 1400-1550" (2006). All Volumes (2001-2008). 67. http://digitalcommons.unf.edu/ojii_volumes/67 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the The sprO ey Journal of Ideas and Inquiry at UNF Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Volumes (2001-2008) by an authorized administrator of UNF Digital Commons. For more information, please contact Digital Projects. © 2006 All Rights Reserved harshness of Janissary training and the In the Lion’s Den: Orthodox strict discipline enforced upon new Christians under Ottoman recruits, and gives numerous examples as to the slave-like status these men are Rule, 1400-1550 reduced.1 Ogier Busbecq offers a different contemporary understanding Neil Paradise from the mid 16th century. The Holy Roman Empire’s ambassador writes in 2005 History Paper Prize Winner glowing terms of the discipline and courtesy of the Janissaries. He also Faculty Sponsor: Dr. Michael Francis, remarks that Janissary detachments are Associate Professor of History scattered throughout the Empire not only to guard against external threats but also The Ottoman Empire’s conquest to protect Christians and Jews from the of the Balkans and subsequent “violence of the mob”.2 The contrast administration left a perplexing religious between Ogier’s and Ludlow’s reactions legacy. The Islamic Ottoman presence speaks to dual Western European lasted almost five centuries, yet reactions to the empire during the time Christianity remained the overwhelming period studied, alternating between fear religion of choice in the area. The and respect for its successes. As Europe Ottoman treatment of subject Christians advanced and the Ottoman military and has been long debated, with technological advantage became a thing characterizations ranging from a of the past, this strong reaction to the cosmopolitan haven of freedom to a Empire and its subject Christians would brutal rule of forced conversion. fade to relative silence.3 However, the real picture appears far Modern historians have offered a more complex than these generalizations more detailed look at the Church / State – the Ottoman relationship with relationship. Greek historian G. Orthodox Christianity in the Balkans Georgiades Arnakis focused on the changed over time, depending in part on Church in Constantinople for an article religious tenets but also largely on the published in 1953. Arnakis portrays the realities and varying situations facing the rights of the Church as legally Ottoman state over time. A glance at the established and binding, but far from Orthodox Christian church under the inviolable in practice.4 He paints a Ottoman Empire from the early fifteenth to mid sixteenth century gives a 1 "The Tribute of Children, 1493," July 1998 revealing glimpse at some of the [cited 2004]. Available from changing relationships of conquered http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/islam/1493janiss aries.html., 1. Christians to the state. 2 Accounts of historians from "The Turkish Letters, 1555-1562," July 1998 [cited 2004]. Available from various perspectives have viewed the http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/1555busbe Orthodox/Ottoman relationship in vastly cq.html., 1. different lights. Englishman James 3 Mark Mazower, The Balkans: A Short History, Ludlow’s report on the Janissary system (New York: Modern Library, 2000), xxxiii to in the late fifteenth century gives an xxxv. 4 G. Georgiades Arnakis, "The Greek Church of impression of Islamic religious Constantinople and the Ottoman Empire," The domination. Ludlow emphasizes the Journal of Modern History 24, no. 3 (1952): 239. picture of persecution, citing part to difficulties in reorienting a conversions of churches to mosques, previously decentralized religious martyrdom of patriarchs in the mid organization into an administrative seventeenth century, and characterizes successor to the Byzantine state10. The Ottoman authorities as valuing Ottoman state exerts substantial pressure Christians as little more than a tax base indirectly (and occasionally directly), to be exploited.5 Arnakis presents the but Runciman finds Christian difficulties relationship as a power struggle, by a stemming from the second-class stature church “waging a struggle for typical to subjugated minorities in Christianity” against the “islamicization Islamic states. and turkification” presumably desired by Recent examinations of the the Ottoman government.6 Overall, Balkans have used very different Arnakis views the continued existence of approaches to discover a new Christianity in Ottoman lands as perspective. Braude and Lewis’s evidence of the triumph of the Orthodox collection from a 1978 research seminar Church in an unequal religious struggle. builds on Runciman’s legacy in Steven Runciman takes a more examining the status of Christians at comprehensive look at the Church under particular points in time through various Ottoman rule in his book, published in articles. They elaborate that Christian 1968. Runciman characterizes the minority status under Islam was a “millet” system of semi-autonomous self compact between the rulers and ruled – government used by the Ottomans as it could be used to keep Christians in along traditional Islamic lines, and states their proper place, but also to prevent the practice was so well known that it government abuses. The authors was unlikely to have ever been officially characterize the treatment of Christians written down.7 He does find codified by the authorities as variable depending legal restrictions on Christians, and on the circumstances.11 Overall, the characterizes them as second-class editors summarize the contributions and citizens.8 He also discusses the conclusions on the status of Christians as Church’s ongoing difficulties in one governed more often by practical maintaining urban churches and considerations than strict Islamic law. establishing schools thanks to Ottoman Dennis Hupchick also offers a different interference, but he concludes this is as perspective on the Church-State much an inherent result of the Ottoman relationship in his 1993 article focusing conception of the place of subjugated on Bulgarian ethnic awareness. peoples rather than any systematic Hupchick describes the church as a persecution9. Runciman finds the “veritable department” in the Ottoman problems of the Church to be in large 5 Arnakis, 238, 243-248. 6 Arnakis, 245. 10 Runciman, 206-207. 7 Steven Runciman, The Great Church in 11 Benjamin Braude and Bernard Lewis eds., Captivity: a Study of the Patriarchate of Christians and Jews in the Ottoman Empire: The Constantinople from the eve of the Turkish Functioning of a Plural Society, (New York: Conquest to the Greek War of Independence Holmes & Meier Publishers, Inc., 1982), 9. (London: Cambridge U.P., 1968), 167, 170. Braude remarks that enforcement of restrictions 8 Runciman, 79. depended most on whether the state felt 9 Runciman, 192, 218. threatened. government.12 He also finds active Muslims, a confirmation of their subject efforts by the Ottomans to assimilate status.16 This sort of pointed legal Bulgarian lands through resettlement of framework is not surprising, given the Turks coupled with displacement of circumstances in which Mohammed Bulgarians from towns, though he created Islam. Near Eastern minds had admits the practice was spotty and always respected the founders of the inconsistent.13 Hupchick agrees with other great monotheistic faiths.17 Even earlier historians in that Ottoman policy Arabia still contained minority changed over time, but his contribution communities at the time of to the general debate is his focus on the Mohammed’s death, and it offered church as a means of enhancing cultural precedents such as treaties made with the and ethnic identity. He concludes that Christian community of Najrān (who the Church promoted Greek Orthodoxy promised aid to the Prophet).18 As the over the interests of its various religious and legal backbone of Islamic constituencies, and that the “millet” behavior, the Koran’s tolerance for system drowned out competing cultures specific religious minorities was a major under Greek ideals. factor in the attitude of Muslims to these Perhaps the most profitable conquered peoples. starting point in deciphering the status of The reality of dramatic Islamic Christians in the Ottoman Empire is the military successes also served to legal and religious traditions regarding promote a policy of conciliation to religious minorities the Ottomans conquered peoples. The origin of Islamic inherited from early Islamic law and tolerance for the practice of other practice. Early Islamic law took care to religions seems to stem from the very impart a special status to people of earliest period of Muslim conquest, as monotheistic, confessional faiths such as the numerically inferior Muslim Arabs Christianity. The Koran’s statement that found themselves needing security “there is no constraint in religion” was precautions over their new subjects.19 generally interpreted as an The contemporary Muslim Balādhurī encouragement of tolerance towards shows a striking example of the reality