DOCSLIB.ORG

NSF's Fastlane QEM Career Workshop March 6

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NSF's Fastlane QEM Career Workshop March 6 NSF’s FastLane QEM Career Workshop March 6 - 7, 2015 Hilton Baltimore BWI Airport Linthicum Heights, Md. Evelyn F. Baisey-Thomas [email protected] Ques%ons: Contact: Evelyn F. Baisey-Thomas Program Overview 3/9/15 PAGE 52 Automated Compliance Checking in FastLane of GPG Required Proposal Sections Proposals Not Accepted • A new category of non-award decisions and transactions • Defined as “FastLane will not permit submission of the proposal” • Category applies to: - Project Summaries - Data Management Plans - Postdoctoral Mentoring Plans • As of March 2013 FastLane began checking for all GPG required sections of proposals. GPG Required Sections of the Proposal • Project Summary * • Project Description • References Cited • Biographical Sketch(es) • Budget • Budget Justification • Current and Pending Support • Facilities, Equipment & Other Resources • Supplementary Documentation * Data Management Plan and Postdoctoral Mentoring Plan (where applicable) are already being auto-compliance checked FastLane Will now Check • FastLane will check for the presence of GPG required sections of the proposal • If a section is not included, FastLane will not permit submission of the proposal • FastLane will now also check: - Formatting - Page Length - Content Automated Compliance Checking GPG-specific auto-compliance checks, implemented September 15, 2014: • Enforce page count rules for the following proposal sections: - Project Description - Budget Justification - Mentoring Plan - Data Management Plan • Budget Checks: implement duration and requested amount compliance checks (Example: maximum requested amount cannot exceed $200,000 for a RAPID Proposal) • Funding Mechanism/Proposal Section auto-compliance checks, anticipated January 26, 2015: - Enforce proposal sections depending on the funding mechanism type (Example: enforce a project description for a research grant) Automated Compliance Checking • March 2013, NSF enforced the following GPG required proposal sections during proposal intake: (* already being auto-compliance checked) -Project Summary* - Project Description - References Cited - Biographical Sketch(es) - Budget - Budget Justification - Current and Pending Support - Facilities, Equipment & Other Resources - Supplementary Documentation -Data Management Plan * -Postdoctoral Mentoring Plan (where applicable) * • Non-Compliance Findings: - Triggered when the PI checks the proposal, forwards it to the SPO, and when the SPO submits to NSF - Error (hard stop) or Warning Message Auto Compliance Checking • Principal Investigators (PI) - Will receive warning messages if any of the GPG required sections are missing - Will be able to forward proposal to their institution’s SPO • Sponsored Projects Office (SPO) - FastLane will prevent submission from the SPO if any of the GPG required sections is missing Auto Compliance Checking cont’d • If the program announcement submission instructions do not require one of the sections, proposers will need to insert text or upload a document in that section of the proposal with “Not Applicable” - This will enable FastLane to accept the proposal. Auto Compliance Checking cont’d • Biographical Sketches and Current and Pending Support - FastLane permits biosketches and current and pending support sections to be uploaded as a single PDF for the PI, co-PI and senior personnel - For FastLane to accept the proposal, proposers must insert text or upload a document that states, “Not Applicable” for all co-PI’s or senior person Proposal Margin and Spacing Requirements The proposal must be clear, readily legible, and conform to the following requirements: a. Use one of the following typefaces identified below: • Arial10, Courier New, or Palatino Linotype at a font size of 10 points or larger • Times New Roman at a font size of 11 points or larger • Computer Modern family of fonts at a font size of 11 points or larger A font size of less than 10 points may be used for mathematical formulas or equations, figure, table or diagram captions and when using a Symbol font to insert Greek letters or special characters. PIs are cautioned, however, that the text must still be readable; b. No more than 6 lines of text within a vertical space of 1 inch; and c. Margins, in all directions, must be at least an inch. *Note: These requirements apply to all uploaded sections of a proposal Automated Compliance Checking Impact on Grants.gov Proposals The NSF Grants.gov Application Guide specifies the same general content requirements for proposal submission. • Grants.gov may allow a proposal to be submitted even if one of the required sections is missing. • If a section is missing, a proposal may be returned without review. • Proposals submitted through Grants.gov must include all GPG-required sections or include a document stating that the section is "Not Applicable. NSF Implementation of the Research Performance Progress Report (RPPR) • Compliant with new OMB-OSTP approved RPPR format and data dictionary • Implemented in March 2013 in Research.gov for PIs, co-PIs, SPOs • Replaces annual, interim, and final project reports in FastLane Structured data collection Award Cash Management Service (ACM$) • NSF’s new financial and accounting system • Financial services were unavailable from September 19 to October 13, 2014 • Last date to submit draw downs for awards was September 18, 2014 • Beginning October 1, NSF began making all payments using System for Award Management (SAM) banking information .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FASTLANE NEXT GENERATION User Guide
    Developed by TEI Software Development for Louisiana Economic Development FASTLANE NEXT GENERATION User Guide Contents About FASTLANE Next Generation ............................................................................................................... 4 Available Incentive Programs.................................................................................................................... 4 FASTLANE Next Generation Features ....................................................................................................... 4 How to Use FASTLANE Next Generation ....................................................................................................... 5 Account Registration ................................................................................................................................. 5 Login after new Registration ..................................................................................................................... 7 Log in with an account created in Old FASTLANE ..................................................................................... 8 Forgot Password ..................................................................................................................................... 10 Search Advance Data .............................................................................................................................. 12 Search Project Data ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A04120071 Page 1 of 1
    +PC * S NATIONU SCIENCE FOUNDATION OFFICEOFFICE OF OF INSPECTOR INVESTIGATIONS GENERAL z4 .q$$@!0 CLOSEOUT MEMORANDUM D~~~~ \o Case Number: A04120071 Page 1 of 1 In connection with a proactive review, we reviewed an awardee's ' General Ledger. This review revealed that the awardee had spent the last $32,000 of NSF funds on post-award expenditures. Further iilvestigation revealed that the PI had requested an extension of tiine to complete work beyond the award's expiration, but NSF denied this request. In addition, investigation revealed that despite NSF's denial of the second-no-cost extension, the PI engineered the draw down of the $32,000 by falsely characteriziilg the draw down as a reimbursement. However, the ~najorityof the funds, approxi~nately$27,000, were used to fund newly incurred, ongoing, post-award expenses. Thereafter, the awardee filed a false final Federal Cash Transaction Report certifying that all award funds had been spent. Then, the PI filed a Final Report that falsely represented that all work on the award was complete. When asked about this by OIG investigators, the PI said she didn't know the second no-cost extension had been denied by NSF. The weight of the evidence refuted this assertion. Without adinitting liability, the awardee settled a civil false claims case with the Department of Justice for $52,150 and agreed to enter into a self-governance programdesigned to ensure that it will operate with honestly and integrity and in compliance with applicable law. In a separate and unrelated ad~ni~listrativeaction, the PI was debarred by NSF for 5 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Agency Collaboration a Case Study of Cross-Agency Priority Goals
    2017 Collaborating Across Boundaries Series Cross-Agency Collaboration A Case Study of Cross-Agency Priority Goals John M. Kamensky IBM Center for The Business of Government Collaborating Across Boundaries Series 2017 Cross-Agency Collaboration: A Case Study of Cross-Agency Priority Goals John M. Kamensky IBM Center for The Business of Government CROSS-AGENCY COLLABORATION: A CASE STUDY OF CROSS-AGENCY PRIORITY GOALS www.businessofgovernment.org Table of Contents Foreword . 4 Executive Summary . 6 Introduction . 9 The Context for Cross-Agency Collaboration . 11 The Growing Demand for Cross-Agency Collaboration to Address Public Challenges . 11 Institutional Constraints on Cross-Agency Collaboration . 13 Understanding Cross-Agency Priority (CAP) Goals . 14 The Creation of New Authority to Act Across Agency Boundaries . 15 What Were the CAP Goals for the Fiscal Year 2014–2017 Period? . 16 Characteristics of CAP Goals During the Fiscal Year 2014–2017 Period . 18 Observations on the Implementation of CAP Goals, FY 2014–2017 . 22 How Did the CAP Goals Operate? . 22 How Did Agencies Effectively Collaborate on the CAP Goals? . 27 How Is the Federal Government Building Capacity to Undertake Cross-Agency Collaboration? . 29 How Did Internal and External Reviews and Reporting Take Place? . 30 What Has Been the Impact of CAP Goals? . 32 Tangible, But Qualitative, Achievements of Mission and Mission-Support Results . 32 Improved Governance and Processes for Cross-Agency Collaboration . 34 Created New Capacities to Govern Across Agency Boundaries . 34 Encourages Greater Cross-Agency Collaboration Beyond CAP Goals . 35 Recommendations for Improving the Next Round of CAP Goals . 37 Improvements to the Governmentwide Goal Framework and Governance System .
    [Show full text]
  • 3995 Full-Service Auto/Truck Repair
    NORTH WOODS A SPECIAL SECTION OF THE VILAS COUNTY NEWS-REVIEW POSTAL PATRON AND THE THREE LAKES NEWS PRSRT STD ECRWSS U.S. Postage PAID Saturday, Permit No. 13 Eagle River Aug. 16, 2014 (715) 479-4421 AWARD-WINNING NEWS COVERAGE AWARD-WINNING © Eagle River Publications, Inc. 1972 THE PAUL BUNYAN OF NORTH WOODS ADVERTISING NOW AVAILABLE ONTHEWEB AVAILABLE NOW 5353 Hwy. 70 West Eagle River, WI 54521 (800) 341-4421 vcnewsreview.com vcnewsreview.com 3620 N. Hwy. 47 3620 N.Hwy. your needs! for all See us Mufflers Brake Work Rotations Tire FULL-SERVICE AUTO/TRUCK REPAIR AUTO/TRUCK FULL-SERVICE $ HOME OFTHE 17 *5-qt. maximum OIL CHANGE OIL www.rhinelanderchrysler.com 95 PARSONS SUMMER SELL-DOWN SALE * 2014 Chevy Silverado 2014 Chevy Silverado 2015 Chevy Silverado 1500 Crew Cab 2500 Crew Cab 2500 Reg. Cab Utility Body Upfit LT, All Star Edition Package, Duramax Diesel, Z71 Appearance Brand FX Utility Body, 6.0L V8, 18" Tires, LED Package, Bedliner Power Windows & Locks, 2014 Chevy Camaro Cargo Lights and much more! 17" All-Terrain Tires LT, V6, 17,463 miles MSRP $43,135 MSRP $57,740 MSRP $45,769 Stk# 2538 Stk #2136 Stk #1153 Stk #9942 $ ** Sale Sale Sale Sale 26,389 $ * $ * $ * 2014 Chevy Impala Limited 37,194 47,225 41,678 LS, 16,188 miles Stk# 3330 $ ** 2014 Buick Enclave 2014 Buick LaCrosse 2013 Buick Verano 2014 Chevy Sonic Sale 19,985 Leather Leather, V6 Engine LT, MyLink Radio MSRP $24,470 2014 Chevy Impala Limited 715-420-1555 MSRP $44,875 MSRP $36,135 MSRP $18,090 LT, 22,138 miles Stk #8446 Stk #9822 Stk #3230 Stk #3904 Stk# 0276 $ ** Sale 20,985 2014 Chevy Impala Limited LS, 16,289 miles • Radiator • FuelInjection • Transmission Alignments Stk# 3244 10% $ All Flushes $ ** 39 $ * $ * $ * $ * Sale 39,945 Sale 32,040 Sale 19,900 Sale 15,495 Sale 19,985 OFF Shop Us Last to Save the Most! 95 * Price includes rebates.
    [Show full text]
  • Dear Colleagues: As Part of the Effort That Began in April 2015, NSF Is
    Dear Colleagues: As part of the effort that began in April 2015, NSF is continuing to transition post‐award notifications and requests from FastLane to Research.gov. Notification and request policies are outlined in the Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide (PAPPG); see the Award and Administration Guide (AAG) Chapter II.A.2. On October 24, 2015, as the next step in this transition, the following two notifications and requests will be released in Research.gov and retired from FastLane: o Grantee‐Approved No‐Cost Extension o NSF‐Approved No‐Cost Extension As of October 24, if you click on the notifications and requests link in FastLane, you will be redirected to login to Research.gov. As a reminder, the following notifications and requests are also available in Research.gov: o Additional categories of participant support costs other than those described in 2 CFR § 200.75 (such as incentives, gifts, souvenirs, t‐shirts and/or memorabilia) o Change in Person‐Months Devoted to Project o Changes in Objectives or Scope o Conflicts of Interest o Long‐term Disengagement of the PI (Principal Investigator)/PD (Project Director) or co‐PI/co‐PD (Over Three Months) o Pre‐award Costs in Excess of 90 Days o Reallocation of Funds Provided for Participant Support Costs o Rearrangements/Alterations in excess of $25,000 (Construction) o Salaries of Administrative or Clerical Staff o Significant Changes/Delays or Events of Unusual Interest o Significant Changes in Methods/Procedures o Travel Costs for Dependents o Withdrawal of PI/PD or co‐PI/co‐PD All remaining notifications and requests will continue to reside in FastLane and will be migrated in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Sunday Morning Grid 2/25/18 Latimes.Com/Tv Times
    SUNDAY MORNING GRID 2/25/18 LATIMES.COM/TV TIMES 7 am 7:30 8 am 8:30 9 am 9:30 10 am 10:30 11 am 11:30 12 pm 12:30 2 CBS CBS News Sunday Face the Nation (N) Bull Riding College Basketball Michigan State at Wisconsin. (N) PGA Golf 4 NBC Today in L.A. Weekend Meet the Press (N) (TVG) Hockey St. Louis Blues at Nashville Predators. (N) Å 2018 Olympics 5 CW KTLA 5 Morning News at 7 (N) Å KTLA News at 9 KTLA 5 News at 10am In Touch Paid Program 7 ABC News This Week News News News Paid NBA Basketball 9 KCAL KCAL 9 News Sunday (N) Joel Osteen Schuller Mike Webb Paid Program REAL-Diego Paid 11 FOX In Touch Paid Fox News Sunday News Weird DIY Sci NASCAR NASCAR Racing 13 MyNet Paid Matter Fred Jordan Paid Program Formosa Betrayed (2009) 18 KSCI Paid Program Paid Program 22 KWHY Paid Program Paid Program 24 KVCR Paint With Painting Joy of Paint Wyland’s Paint This Oil Painting Kitchen Mexican Martha Jazzy Julia Child Chefs Life 28 KCET 1001 Nights 1001 Nights Mixed Nutz Edisons Biz Kid$ Biz Kid$ Pavlo Live in Kastoria Å Joe Bonamassa Live at Carnegie Hall 30 ION Jeremiah Youseff In Touch NCIS: Los Angeles Å NCIS: Los Angeles Å NCIS: Los Angeles Å NCIS: Los Angeles Å 34 KMEX Conexión Paid Program Fútbol Fútbol Mexicano Primera División (N) República Deportiva 40 KTBN James Mac Win Walk Prince Carpenter Jesse In Touch PowerPoint It Is Written Jeffress K.
    [Show full text]
  • Additional Documents
    Additional Documents Fiscal Year 2021 Projected Financial Statement .................................................................... 5 Fiscal Year 2020 Projected Financial Statement .................................................................... 6 Fiscal Year 2019 Financial Statement .................................................................................... 7 Operating Transfers ............................................................................................................... 8 Independents .............................................................................................................................. 8 Administration and Finance ......................................................................................................... 8 Health and Human Services ........................................................................................................ 9 Transportation ........................................................................................................................... 10 Labor & Workforce Development .............................................................................................. 11 Education .................................................................................................................................. 11 Tax Expenditure Budget - Introduction ................................................................................. 14 Introduction - Personal Income Tax .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Automated Proposal Compliance Checks Performed by System As of July 24Th, 2015.*
    = The system runs a compliance check and an Error or Warning message will be displayed (as noted in the “Error/ Warning” column) if the proposal fails the compliance check. BLANK = The system does not run a compliance check. N/A = The system does not run a compliance check because the proposal rule doesn’t apply for this funding mechanism. AUTOMATED PROPOSAL COMPLIANCE CHECKS PERFORMED BY SYSTEM AS OF JULY 24TH, 2015.* FUNDING MECHANISM TYPE FUNDING OPPORTUNITY ERROR / COMPLIANCE CHECK TYPE WARNING IDEAS INTERNATIONAL FACILITY/ RESEARCH RAPID EAGER CONFERENCE EQUIPMENT FELLOWSHIP LAB TRAVEL CENTER Proposal Section Exists Checks GPG Program Description ERROR 1. Project Summary is required. Program Announcement Program Solicitation ERROR GPG Program Description ERROR 2. Project Description is required. Program Announcement Program Solicitation ERROR GPG Program Description ERROR N/A N/A 3. References Cited is required. Program Announcement Program Solicitation WARNING N/A N/A GPG Program Description ERROR N/A N/A 4. Biographical Sketch(es) is Program Announcement required. Program Solicitation WARNING N/A N/A GPG Program Description ERROR 5. Primary Budget is required. Program Announcement Program Solicitation ERROR GPG 6. Budget Justification for Program Description ERROR the Primary Organization is Program Announcement required. Program Solicitation WARNING GPG 7. Budget Justification for each Program Description ERROR Subrecipient Organization that Program Announcement exists is required. Program Solicitation WARNING FOR ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FASTLANE HELP DESK AT 1-800-673-6188. 6/24/2015 FUNDING MECHANISM TYPE FUNDING OPPORTUNITY ERROR / COMPLIANCE CHECK TYPE WARNING IDEAS INTERNATIONAL FACILITY/ RESEARCH RAPID EAGER CONFERENCE EQUIPMENT FELLOWSHIP LAB TRAVEL CENTER GPG Program Description ERROR 8.
    [Show full text]
  • NSF Overview: from Funding Solicitation to Proposal Submission INTRODUCTIONS
    NSF Overview: From Funding Solicitation to Proposal Submission INTRODUCTIONS • Marcia Margotta, Contracts & Grants Specialist – OSR • Missy Wood, Director Research Support and Communications - Computer Science Accessing Fastlane • OSR is responsible for setting up user accounts • To work on a proposal you will need the temporary proposal ID and PIN Number • Access from – www.nsf.gov – www. Fastlane.nsf.gov Accessing Fastlane Sections of the FastLane Proposal NSF SOLICITATIONS VS. PD ANNOUNCEMENTS What to look for How to understand Solicitations = Specific Program Descriptions (PDs) = Broad 4 Types of NSF Proposals • Standard Research • Collaborative Proposals: – Submission from one organization – Submission from multiple organizations • Program-Specific Proposals • Doctoral Dissertation Research Improvement Grants (DDRIG) Collaborative Proposals • Submission from one organization • Submission from multiple organizations Submission from ONE organization • Only ONE proposal is submitted in Fastlane • The partner institution is treated as a subcontract. • Be sure to route subcontractor paperwork with your IPF – Budget and justification – Letter of Intent with COI statement – Statement of Work Submission from multiple organizations • Each institution creates and submits a Fastlane proposal • Proposals are linked by the lead institution • Use print full proposal to view ALL information uploaded to the proposal Submission from multiple organizations Lead Organization Non-Lead Organization Required Sections Required Sections • Project Summary
    [Show full text]
  • Suggested Task List for Submitting by the 2015 NSF GRFP Deadline
    Suggested Task List for Submitting by the 2015 NSF GRFP Deadline DATE TASK ü Review program announcement; determine your eligibility; clarify questions officially with the GRFP office Write down the application deadline for your field of study. Late submissions are NOT accepted! The GRFP is Get registered in the FastLane GRFP system: https://www.fastlane-beta.nsf.gov/grfp/Login.do now open. Write down your log in name, password, and the applicant number assigned to you. Start early. Sign up today! Familiarize yourself with the FastLane GRFP e-submission system. Check for the compatible file formats you will need to be able to upload your documents. Find the essay instructions in Fastlane. Copy & print these instructions - you will need them! Bookmark the GRFP section of the Fastlane User Guide. Flash demo of Fastlane log in & getting started. Develop a simple outline for your proposed research plan (question/problem, aims, methods, citations, etc). Set 2-3 dates with your mentor (adviser) to discuss your outline and evolving research essay drafts Sept 16-20 Contact at least three prospective references to ensure they are available to write letters for you. Enter the names of your references into FastLane GRFP system. Send each the required email notification. Begin completing the required personal information in the FastLane system for the GRFP. Sept 21-25 Download an unoffical transcript or request an official transcript from every higher education institution you have attended (excludes Fall 2014). All transcripts must be submitted electronically on FastLane. No hard copies are accepted. Meet with your mentor this week to discuss the announcement and your research outline (research concept) Create a first draft of your proposed plan of research (essay) from outline.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 WWE Road to Wrestlemania
    BASE BASE CARDS 1 Lince Dorado™ & Gran Metalik™205 def. Live® Buddy Murphy™ & Tony Nese™ 2 Buddy Murphy™ def. Kalisto™205 Live® 3 Buddy Murphy™ def. Cedric SuperAlexander™ Show-Down® for the WWE® Cruiserweight Championship 4 WWE® Cruiserweight ChampionSurvivor Buddy Series®Murphy™ 2018 def. Mustafa Ali™ 5 WWE® Cruiserweight ChampionTLC: Buddy Tables, Murphy™ Ladders def. & Cedric Chairs® Alexander™ 2018 6 Noam Dar™ def. Tony Nese™205 Live® 7 Buddy Murphy™ def. Humberto205 Carrillo™ Live® 8 Buddy Murphy™ Retains the RoyalWWE® Rumble® Cruiserweight 2019 Championship in a Fatal 4-Way 9 Tony Nese™ def. Noam Dar™205 in a Live®No-Disqualification Match 10 WWE® Cruiserweight ChampionElimination Buddy Murphy™ Chamber® def. Akira2019 Tozawa™ 11 Tony Nese™ def. Kalisto™ in the205 First Live® Round of the WWE® Cruiserweight Championship No. 1 Contender Tournament 12 Tony Nese™ def. Drew Gulak™205 in Live®the WWE® Cruiserweight Championship No. 1 Contender Tournament Semi-finals 13 Tony Nese™ def. Cedric Alexander™205 Live® in the WWE® Cruiserweight Championship No. 1 Contender Tournament Finals 14 Tony Nese™ def. Buddy Murphy™WrestleMania® for the WWE® 35 Cruiserweight Championship 15 Universal Champion Roman Reigns™Raw® def. Finn Bálor™ 16 Intercontinental Champion SethRaw® Rollins™ def. Kevin Owens™ 17 Dolph Ziggler™ & Drew McIntyre™Hell in Retain a Cell® the Raw®2018 Tag Team Championship 18 Brock Lesnar™ Decimates RomanHell Reigns™ in a Cell® and 2018Braun Strowman™ 19 Raw® Tag Team Champions DolphRaw® Ziggler™ & Drew McIntyre™ def. The Revival™ 20 Seattle Hates The Elias™ & KevinRaw® Owens™ Show 21 Triple H® def. Undertaker® Super Show-Down® 22 Roman Reigns™ Must RelinquishRaw® the Universal Championship 23 Dolph Ziggler™ def.
    [Show full text]
  • Council of Mayors Executivecommittee
    Jeffery Schielke, Chairman Council of Mayors Executive Committee Mayor, City of Batavia Kane/Kendall Council Draft Minutes – April 12, 2016 Leon Rockingham, Jr., 1st Vice Chair Mayor, City of North Chicago 9:30 a.m. Lake Council CMAP Offices – Cook County Conference Room Eugene Williams, 2nd Vice Chair Mayor, Village of Lynwood South Council Executive Committee and Elected Officials Present George Van Dusen st Mayor, Village of Skokie Mayor Jeffery Schielke, Chairman, Mayor Leon Rockingham, Jr., 1 Vice Chair, President North Shore Council Dave Brady, President Karen Darch, President Michael Einhorn, Mayor Jim Holland, Sandy Frum President, Village of Northbrook President Al Larson (via phone), President Robert Nunamaker, President Ed Ritter, President North Shore Council William Rodeghier, Mayor Jeffrey Sherwin, President Erik Spande Al Larson President, Village of Schaumburg Northwest Council Others Present Karen Darch Len Cannata, John Donovan, Jackie Forbes, Pat Higgins, Janell Jensen, Mike Klemens, Patrick President, Village of Barrington Northwest Council Knapp, Brian Pigeon, Andy Plummer, Chad Riddle, Claire Serdiuk-Anderson, Mike Walczak, Jeffrey Sherwin Barbara Zubek Mayor, City of Northlake North Central Council Joseph Tamburino CMAP Staff Present Mayor, Village of Hillside North Central Council Alex Beata, Bob Dean, Teri Dixon, Elizabeth Irvin, Tom Kotarac, Jen Maddux, Ross Patronsky, James Discipio Russell Pietrowiak, Melissa Porter, Gordon Smith, Joseph Szabo President, Village of LaGrange Park Central Council William Rodeghier 1.0 Call to Order and Introductions President, Village of Western Springs Central Council Mayor Schielke called the meeting to order at 9:30 a.m. Dave Brady President, Village of Bedford Park Southwest Council 2.0 Agenda Changes and Announcements John Mahoney There were no agenda changes or announcements.
    [Show full text]