Cave Lint and Dust Removal Projects Rodney D

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cave Lint and Dust Removal Projects Rodney D Part 3-Restoration: Ilorrocks and Ohms-Lint and Dust 351 Section C-Restoring Cave Passages Cave Lint and Dust Removal Projects Rodney D. Horrocks and Marc Ohms The cumulative nature and impact of lint and dust problems in caves has only recently been recognized, researched, and addressed. Originally noticed in show caves, lint and dust accumulations have also been observed Lint is not merely a in heavily used wild caves. Lint is not merely a benign aesthetic nuisance in caves. Lint and dust benign aesthetic removal projects benefit caves in several ways: nuisance in caves. Lint and dust Restore natural conditions. remoyal projects Prevent unnatural speleothem dissolution. benefit caves in Remove artificial food sources. • Eliminate unnatural odors. several ways . Restore visual scenes. Lint consists of foreign materials shed from human visitors-fibers, hair, dander, and other debris that accumulates along heavily used routes (Figure I). Dust originates from trail construction projects, trampling of unpaved trails, and material brought into the cave by visitors. Lint and dust accumulations can be removed with hand-held brushes, vacuums, or washing, depending on the substrates involved. Not only have methods been developed to restore natural conditions in caves, but tech- niques have also been developed to slow the accumulation and facilitate cleaning of these unnatural deposits. Attempts to restore the aesthetic appeal of developed caves occurred as early as 1960 in Jenolan Caves in Australia (Newbould 1976). Lint was recognized as an unsightly foreign material as early as 1969 at Timpanogos Cave (Horrocks 2000). However, it was not until 1977 that lint was Figure I. Close-up of specifically targeted as a detrimental foreign substance in caves and was collected lint and hair identified as a major component of the dirty-appearing passages in many in Timpanogos Cave developed caves (Roth 1987). Test cleaning was conducted at Carlsbad National Monument, Caverns in 1977 and 1986, and the first "cave lint camps" were organized Utah. in 1988 (Jablonsky 1992a). This chapter empha- sizes lint and dust removal in developed caves. However, the same techniques can be used in wild caves. Reasons for Conducting Lint and Dust Removal Projects Developed caves can only be partially restored to ~ natural conditions. Cave managers must com pro- ~ mise between restoring caves to pristine states and ~ causing additional negative impact. Good cave :g managers must recognize when restoration and ~ z 352 Cave Conservation and Restoration cleaning projects need to be halted. Cave managers or project leaders should stop the work, rethink the situation, and possibly retrain the restoration team before additional damage is caused. Because the impacts from lint and dust are cumulative, periodic restora- tion efforts are usually effective toward maintaining natural conditions in show caves. Removing unnatural lint and dust can prevent foreign materials from being cemented onto the surfaces of actively growing speleothems. The incorporation of introduced materials into secondary deposits can cause permanent discoloration and unnatural textures. In fact, accumulations of lint and dust may partially or completely obscure the natural coloration and sheen of cave surfaces. Lint has been shown to cause the dissolution of some speleothems (Jablonsky and others 1994). Lint may act as a condensation site for undersaturated cave water, and can trap carbon dioxide in or underneath the lint. Lint may also attract bacteria, yeast, molds, or algae that secrete or excrete acids that can dissolve the rock substrate (Crowle 1993a, 1993b). The accumulation of lint in humid cave environments may also result in unnatural musty odors (Moore 1993). Many caves are extremely low-energy environments with limited food sources. Natural fiber lint, hair, and skin (dander) can represent a signifi- cant artificial food source and may provide a nutrient base for microbial life (Moore and Jesser 1995). These food sources can shift the balance of Figure 2. This nutrients that sustain cave-adapted microorganisms (Michie 1997). Biota, collection of lint, trash, such as microbes, mites, beetles, and spiders have been observed in lint and chunks of blond accumulations (Jablonsky 1992a, I992b). Whether the organisms are native boot sole was gathered to the cave or accidentals carried into the cave by humans, populations may in the Chandelier artificially balloon as a result of artificial food sources. (See cave microbi- Maze, Lechuguilla ology, page 61). Cave, Carlsbad Caverns National Park, Nature of Lint and Dust New Mexico. Developed caves may have a dusty and dirty appearance caused by a combination of factors. In order of importance, they are listed here: Construction-generated dust Dust from tours traveling over unpaved trails Dust tracked into caves on shoes or brought in on clothes • Lint accumulations • Other materials shed from humans • Natural dust Human visitors shed a plethora of other materials into caves (Jablonsky 1995). Lint and dust removal efforts should address most of these foreign materials: Hair Dander Skin flakes and debris Mites Microbes Shoe rubber Pet animal fur Part 3-Restoration: Lint and Dust-Horrocks and Ohms 353 Lint is composed primarily of fibers from natural and synthetic fabrics. Natural cellulose-based fibers include cotton, hemp, and linen. Natural protein-based fibers include keratin, wool, alpaca, mohair, silk, and cashmere. Synthetic fibers include oil-based synthetic polymers (Michie 1997). Both natural and synthetic fibers are usually present. Old deposits of lint in caves may be almost entirely synthetic fibers. Natural libers are morc brittle and tend to shed more over time but they are often eliminated by deterioration or consumed by molds, fungi, or bacteria, resulting in concentrations of synthetic fiber lint (Jablonsky 1995). Dust is composed of silica and fine clay mineral particles ranging from 0.1 micron to 100 microns In sIze. Recognizing Lint and Dust Accumulations Due to the gradual accumulations oflint and dust Q; in show caves, long-term employees may not ~ recognize the subtle color changes and worsening ~ l' conditions associated with these deposits. These :g conditions are noticeable only when the walls near ~ trails are viewed close-up with a bright flashlight. ~ Older deposits appear as a grayish mass made up nf finely ground lint and Figure 3. This strand dust. Black lights are useful in locating lint concentrations because many of hairy lint was found natural fibers are treated with optical brighteners that reflect long-wave ofTtrai I near Lake ultraviolet (UV) light. When viewed under a black light, these fibers Chandalar, Lechu- appear bluish-white against dark cave surfaces. guilla Cave, Carlsbad Caverns National Accumulation of Lint Park, New Mexico. Lint accumulation is influenced by many different factors: Number of cave visitors Gravity A if movement Cave wall contours and textures Trail design Heat Humidity Generally, more visitors lead to greater deposits of lint. Mammoth Cave, Kentucky, and Carlsbad Cavern, New Mexico, generate tremendous accumulations oflint in short periods of time. Observations in Lehman Caves, Nevada, showed noticeable lint accumulating one year after cleaning (Horrocks and Green 2000). Lint accumulates faster at interpretive stops, especially those where visitors sit down. More lint is produced by a combination of longer times spent at sit-down spots and the abrasive nature of clothes rubbing against benches. Lint fibers also get caught in shoe soles and are tracked through- out tour routes. Most lint initially falls directly to the floor and is then moved laterally to the edge of the trail by foot traffic. Lint also tends to concentrate on the lower portion of walls immediately adjacent to trails. Trail design and construction materials can influence how and where lint accumulates. 354 Cave Conservation and Restoration • Trails with curbs 20- to 60-centimeters (8- to 24- inches) high, capture a large percentage of lint falling from visitors' clothes (Jablonsky 1995). • Trails with grates and underlying tarps capture a larger percentage of lint. Grated trail surfaccs must be periodically cleaned because the open sp.aces become i chokcd with lint, dust, and other debris. "i ~ Airflow determines where lint accumulates. Over l time, trampled fibers on the trail become airborne ~ and are carried by air movement and redeposited Z on cave surfaces away from the Figure 4. Along trails. Large quantities of lint may be deposited on ledges high above a trail developed cave lour or on ceiling formations (Figure 4). Fibers less than 3 microns in size will routes, lint is carried become suspended immediately, without falling to the trail. These fibcrs on air currents and will dcsccndcd at a rate of 1 meter (3 feet) every 9 minutes in laboratory collect and mass along conditions (Moser 1988). certain ledges. This Manmade entrances and tunnels may artificially increase cave airflow example from and compound lint problems. Lint accumulations lend to concentrate on Timpano-gos Cave flat or sloping shelves. Lint also accumulates on any rough surface, National Monument especially on stalactites, popcorn, helictites, spiked frostwork, or on shows thick lint low ceilings. [n dryer areas, accumulations will often ball up into "lint deposits on a ledge. bunnies." Heat generated from lights and visitors can cause distribution, or redistribution, of lint near trails. Movement of people also causes airflow disturbances
Recommended publications
  • A Basic Design Approach to Clean Room
    www.PDHcenter.com PDH Course M143 www.PDHonline.org A Basic Design Guide for Clean Room Applications Course Content PART – I OVERVIEW Clean rooms are defined as specially constructed, environmentally controlled enclosed spaces with respect to airborne particulates, temperature, humidity, air pressure, airflow patterns, air motion, vibration, noise, viable (living) organisms, and lighting. Particulate control includes: !" Particulate and microbial contamination !" Particulate concentration and dispersion “Federal Standard 209E” defines a clean room as a room in which the concentration of airborne particles is controlled to specified limits. “British Standard 5295” defines a clean room as a room with control of particulate contamination, constructed and used in such a way as to minimize the introduction, generation and retention of particles inside the room and in which the temperature, humidity, airflow patterns, air motion and pressure are controlled. Today, many manufacturing processes require that spaces be designed to control particulate and microbial contamination while maintaining reasonable installation and operating costs. Clean rooms are typically used in manufacturing, packaging, and research facilities associated with these industries: 1. Semiconductor: This industry drives the state of the art clean room design, and this industry accounts for a significant number of all operating clean rooms. 2. Pharmaceutical: Clean rooms control living particles that would produce undesirable bacterial growth in the preparation of biological, pharmaceutical, and other medical products as well as in genetic engineering research. Page 1 of 61 www.PDHcenter.com PDH Course M143 www.PDHonline.org 3. Aerospace: The manufacturing and assembling of aerospace electronics, missiles and satellites were the first application of clean rooms.
    [Show full text]
  • What You Should Know About Microfiber Pollution Scientists Estimate That Over 8 Million Tons of Plastic Enter Our Oceans Each Year
    What You Should Know About Microfiber Pollution Scientists estimate that over 8 million tons of plastic enter our oceans each year. While we have all seen the plastic bottles, bags, and straws that contribute to the plastic pollution problem, one major source of plastic pollution is less obvious: our clothes. The majority of clothing on the planet is made from plastic-based materials like polyester, rayon, nylon, and acrylic. When washed, synthetic clothing sheds tiny plastic fragments known as microfibers. Microfibers are the most prevalent type of microplastic (plastic pieces less than 5 mm in diameter) found in the environment. Though we cannot see them, plastic microfibers are all around us. Researchers have found microfibers in a diverse range of land and aquatic ecosystems, from shorelines and the seafloor, to remote areas in US National Parks, and even in snow in the Alps and the Arctic. Once in the environment, microfibers are extremely difficult to clean up. For this reason, it is critical to prevent this type of pollution from entering the environment in the first place. Additional research is needed to understand how microfibers enter the environment and where they come from, but many studies suggest that washing clothes is one major source. A 2019 study by Ocean Wise estimated that the average household in the U.S. 1 and Canada releases 533 million microfibers – or 135 grams – of microfibers to wastewater treatment plants each year. Wastewater treatment plants filter out the majority of microfibers, but because they are so small, some microfibers pass through the wastewater treatment systems, entering our waterways and oceans.
    [Show full text]
  • Gettysburg National Military Park STUDENT PROGRAM
    Gettysburg National Military Park STUDENT PROGRAM 1 Teachers’ Guide Table of Contents Purpose and Procedure ...................................3 FYI ...BackgroundInformationforTeachersandStudents CausesoftheAmericanCivilWar .........................5 TheBattleofGettysburg .................................8 CivilWarMedicalVocabulary ...........................12 MedicalTimeline ......................................14 Before Your Field Trip The Oath of Allegiance and the Hippocratic Oath ...........18 Squad #1 Activities — Camp Doctors .....................19 FieldTripIdentities .........................20 "SickCall"Play..............................21 CampDoctorsStudyMaterials ................23 PicturePages ...............................25 Camp Report — SickCallRegister .............26 Squad #2 Activities — BattlefieldDoctors .................27 FieldTripIdentities .........................28 "Triage"Play ...............................29 BattlefieldStudyMaterials ...................30 Battle Report — FieldHospitalRegister ........32 Squad #3 Activities — HospitalDoctors ...................33 FieldTripIdentities .........................34 "Hospital"Play..............................35 HospitalStudyMaterials(withPicturePages) ...37 Hospital Report — CertificateofDisability .....42 Your Field Trip Day FieldTripDayProcedures ..............................43 OverviewoftheFieldTrip ..............................44 Nametags .............................................45 After Your Field Trip SuggestedPost-VisitActivities ...........................46
    [Show full text]
  • Trace Evidence
    Procedure Santa Ana Police Department 6101 Santa Ana PD Procedures Manual TRACE EVIDENCE 6101.1 PURPOSE This procedure establishes guidelines for the proper identification and collection of trace evidence. 6101.2 INTRODUCTION Trace evidence is defined as small evidentiary particles and includes, but is not limited to, hair, fibers, glass fragmentation, paint transfers / chips, gun shot residue, fire debris, botanical material, soil, and unknown chemical solids or liquids. Locard’s Exchange Principle states that whenever two objects come into contact a transfer of material will occur. The transfer may be primary (direct) or secondary (indirect) and usually involves trace evidence. Personnel responsible for the collection of trace evidence at any crime scene shall adhere to the following guidelines. Their actions or inactions should be based upon the particulars of each crime scene and firmly rooted in accepted forensic practices. 6101.3 PROCEDURE FOR LOCATING/IDENTIFYING TRACE EVIDENCE The following methods for detecting trace evidence at crime scenes are acceptable. No one method is correct for any given circumstance and it is recommended that more than one, if not all, methods be used to locate potential trace evidence at a scene. 1. Using direct light can be a very effective way of locating trace evidence. The brighter the light source, the more likely the forensic investigator will notice subtle differences in color and contrast of adhering surface particles. 2. Oblique lighting takes advantage of differences in the reflective qualities of particles versus the reflective qualities of the surface on which the particles reside. This method works well under low ambient light conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin of Lint and Fuzz Hairs of Cotton^
    THE ORIGIN OF LINT AND FUZZ HAIRS OF COTTON^ By A. G. LANG Formerly agent, Division of Cotton and Other Fiber Crops and Diseases, Bureau of Plant Industry y United States Department of Agriculture INTRODUCTION The mature seeds of most varieties of upland cotton are covered with two different types of hairs, (1) the long lint hairs that are ex- tensively used in the manufacture of fabrics, and (2) the short, thick-walled, fuzz hairs (linters) that form a dense, tangled mat close to the surface of the seed. Both lint and fuzz hairs are single-celled, tubular outgrowths that arise from the epidermal cells of the seed coat. Although the principal difference between the lint and fuzz hairs is the much greater length of the lint, it is usually difficult or impossible to draw a sharp line of demarcation between them on this basis. Very short lint hairs and long fuzz hairs may be indistinguish- able. It is sometimes possible, however, to distinguish between lint and fuzz by their position on the ovules and seeds. In some varieties of cotton both the Hnt and fuzz hairs are restricted to specific and sometimes separate areas on the surface of the seed, giving rise to various ''patterns.'' In the so-called naked seed varieties the fuzz hairs are entirely missing, so that removal of the lint leaves the seed coat smooth and free from hairs. In some varieties the lint and fuzz hairs are pigmented differently, and frequently pigment is present in the fuzz when it is entirely absent from the lint hairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Our Educational Materials
    2 Cotton: A Miraculous Fiber A Unique, Natural Fiber Cotton is a natural fiber with layers of highly organized cellulose surrounding a Even after 8,000 years, cotton remains Why we love Cotton hollow core. The pitch, or angle, of the cell the most miraculous fiber under the sun. Cotton is the most used fiber in the layers alternate, first one way then the No other single fiber comes close to dupli- world. It’s popular because it’s versatile. other, which accounts for cotton’s extraor- cating all the desirable characteristics It’s used in apparel, home furnishings, and dinary strength. combined in cotton. industrial and other consumer products. Recently, a science museum in Newark, Cotton is noted for its versatility, There isn’t a part of your day that you did- NJ, lifted a 3,500-pound car with seven appearance, performance, and above all n’t use something made from cotton. The pairs of denim jeans attached to the crane. else, its natural comfort. Cotton in today’s towel after your shower, the shirt and The hollowness and the layering of the fast-moving world is still nature’s wonder pants you put on, the seats in your car. cells also contribute to cotton’s ability fiber, providing thousands of useful prod- The money you used to buy a biscuit for readily to absorb water and to “wick” ucts and supporting millions of jobs. breakfast. All made from cotton. moisture away from the body. A 480 pound bale of cotton can produce: 1,200 men’s T-shirts, 3,000 baby diapers, 1,300 pairs of pillowcases, 690 terrycloth bath towels, more than 730 shirts or blouses, or 215 pairs of 100% Cotton, 100% Usable, men’s denim jeans.
    [Show full text]
  • Clean Laboratories and Clean Rooms for Analysis of Radionuclides and Trace Elements
    IAEA-TECDOC-1339 Clean laboratories and clean rooms for analysis of radionuclides and trace elements January 2003 The originating Section of this publication in the IAEA was: Industrial Applications and Chemistry Section International Atomic Energy Agency Wagramer Strasse 5 P.O. Box 100 A-1400 Vienna, Austria CLEAN LABORATORIES AND CLEAN ROOMS FOR ANALYSIS OF RADIONUCLIDES AND TRACE ELEMENTS IAEA, VIENNA, 2003 IAEA-TECDOC-1339 ISBN 92–0–100603–9 ISSN 1011–4289 © IAEA, 2003 Printed by the IAEA in Austria January 2003 FOREWORD The need for reliable and accurate measurements of elements at trace and ultra trace concentrations is now well established and has been addressed in numerous textbooks and in a number of publications of the International Atomic Energy Agency. Less well known might be the fact that the reliable analysis of samples is often found to be hampered by insufficient control of the analytical blank. As methods become more and more sensitive, the target elements of major interest in natural matrices become less abundant (e.g. platinum metals in the environment, ultra traces in biomedical research, or semiconductor analysis) and there is increasing demand for speciation analysis, where only fractions of the total trace element content are targeted. Because of the need for stringent control of contamination during sample handling, preparation, separation and enrichment as well as during the determination process, establishment of a clean laboratory environment is mandatory. Particulate contamination in the laboratory air may be controlled by the use of high efficiency particulate (HEPA) filters, which were developed during World War II for the Manhattan Project and were used to provide containment of radioactive particulates within the laboratory.
    [Show full text]
  • From Gin to Fabric Cotton Gins Like This One Are Mostly Located in Cotton Regions to Cut Transport Costs
    CHAPTER 7 Processing: from Gin to Fabric Cotton gins like this one are mostly located in cotton regions to cut transport costs GINNING Cotton gins are factories that complete the first stage of processing cotton – separating the lint from the seed. Gin is short for en-“gin”. In Australia gins are located in cotton areas to avoid costly transport. Cotton is pressed under Before the gin was invented, the lint and seed were separated very high pressure by by hand. It took one person a whole day to separate only half a bale press into bales a kilo of the lint from the cottonseed. Modern gins can separate weighing 227kg each and bale about 230,000 kilograms of cotton in one day. THE GINNING PROCESS The seed cotton arrives at the gin in round bales or modules. The first step in the ginning process is where the cotton is vacuumed into tubes that carry it to a dryer. Cotton must be ginned with a moisture level of 5%. The cotton is dried out if it is too wet or water is added if it is too dry to ensure the correct moisture level. Next, the cotton goes through several Gin is short stages of cleaning equipment to remove leaf trash, sticks, for en-“gin” dirt and other foreign matter. After cleaning, the cotton is then ready for separation in the gin stand. The gin stand removes the seed from the lint. In Australia, most cotton is ginned with saw gins where fast moving circular saws grip the fibres and pull them through narrow slots.
    [Show full text]
  • AP-42, CH 9.7: Cotton Ginning
    9.7 Cotton Ginning 9.7.1 General1-8 Cotton ginning takes place throughout the area of the United States known as the Sunbelt. Four main production regions can be designated: • Southeast—Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, and Florida • Mid-South—Missouri, Tennessee, Mississippi, Arkansas, and Louisiana • Southwest—Texas and Oklahoma • West—New Mexico, Arizona, and California The majority of the ginning facilities are located in Texas, Mississippi, Arkansas, California, and Louisiana. The industry trend is toward fewer gins with higher processing capacity. In 1979, 2,332 active gins in the United States produced 14,161,000 bales of cotton. By the 1994/1995 season, the number of cotton gins in the United States dropped to 1,306, but about 19,122,000 bales were produced. The average volume processed per gin in 1994/1995 was 14,642 bales. Cotton ginning is seasonal. It begins with the maturing of the cotton crop, which varies by region, and ends when the crop is finished. Each year the cotton ginning season starts in the lower Southwest region in midsummer, continues through the south central and other geographical regions in late summer and early autumn, and ends in the upper Southwest region in late autumn and early winter. Overall, U. S. cotton is ginned between October 1 and December 31, with the bulk of the crop from each geographical region being ginned in 6 to 8 weeks. During the remainder of the year, the gin is idle. All U. S. cotton in commercial production is now harvested by machines of two types, picking and stripping.
    [Show full text]
  • Microfiber Action Roadmap V6
    COMBATING MICROFIBER POLLUTION The current state of knowledge, research, and actions across sectors to address a growing threat to ocean and human health WHAT ARE MICROFIBERS? STATE OF KNOWLEDGE Microscopic strands (less than 5mm Microfibers have been found in Clothing is a prominent Clothing and other textiles can shed global oceans, rivers, agricultural source of microfiber thousands of fibers every wash cycle. long) of synthetic and natural textile soils, marine and freshwater pollution, but carpet, fibers that are shed during product animals, and upholstery, toiletries, Microfibers have a unique shape and life cycles and end up in our oceans products sold and other products also associated chemicals, and can attract and other ecosystems. for human shed fibers that can pathogens and pollutants throughout Source: Patagonia consumption. enter the environment. their life cycle. EMERGING SOLUTIONS & MAJOR KNOWLEDGE GAPS NEXT STEPS Which products, materials, manufacturing What effects do microfibers and their associated Several new products aim to capture clothing fibers in the wash. processes, and life cycle phases contribute chemicals have on ecosystem, animal and human the most to microfiber pollution? health? Regulators are evaluating options to compel companies to reduce and/or effectively manage microfiber pollution. How do microfiber emissions to the Can we design products that don't shed fibers Stakeholders across sectors are increasingly collaborating environment and transport pathways vary and/or processes to remove microfibers that to better understand and address the problem. around the world? have already entered the environment? There is a strong need for additional research, testing, and innovation that improves our understanding of microfiber pollution and its impact on human and environmental health.
    [Show full text]
  • Fractionation of Foreign Matter in Ginned Lint Before and After Lint Cleaning
    FRACTIONATION OF FOREIGN MATTER IN GINNED LINT BEFORE AND AFTER LINT CLEANING J. C. Boykin, C. B. Armijo, D. P. Whitelock, M. D. Buser, G. A. Holt, T. D. Valco, D. S. Findley, E. M. Barnes, M. D. Watson ABSTRACT. One goal of lint cleaning at a cotton gin is to reduce the non‐lint material to an acceptable level with minimal fiber damage. In an effort to improve lint cleaner performance, an initial study was conducted on lint collected before and after lint cleaning at nine commercial gins across the cotton belt to characterize non‐lint content. Samples from this study were first processed with an MDTA‐3 (Micro Dust and Trash Analyzer 3, SDL Atlas, Stockport, U.K.) to determine trash, fiber fragment, and dust content. The trash portion was retained for additional manual fractionation to determine the percent of material classified as seed coat fragments (SCF), motes, funiculi, sticks, leaf, bark, lint, and “other” material. Leaf, SCF, and sticks were the largest fractions, accounting for 81% of the total trash sample. Overall, total trash decreased by 57% due to lint cleaning, and trash fractions remained consistent in samples before and after lint cleaning. Lint cleaning efficiency in terms of SCF was less than the overall cleaning efficiency, and lint cleaning efficiency for bark, mote, and other (all minor components) was higher than the overall cleaning efficiency. The lint cleaning efficiency for SCF was increased significantly when higher SCF levels were found before the lint cleaner, but this trend was not found for other fractions. Results of this experiment will help direct future studies to improve lint cleaning.
    [Show full text]
  • Lint and the Laundromat
    LINT AND THE LAUNDROMAT LINT MAKING GUIDE ZOEHERRING¨ Lint and the Laundromat | Zoe Herring | Overview 1 Lint and the Laundromat | Spring 2020 | Amanda Hugh | IND 402-04 ZOE HERRING Lint and the Laundromat | Spring 2020 | Amanda Hugh | IND 402-04 Lint and the Laundromat | Zoe Herring | Table of Contents 5 Table of Contents 6 Overview 8 Research 22 Ideation 27 COVID-19 34 Material Research 46 Final Deliverables 56 Personal Resources 66 Bibliography Lint and the Laundromat | Zoe Herring | Table of Contents 5 Overview Lint and the Laundromat | Zoe Herring | Overview 7 LINT AND THE LAUNDROMAT This project explores the exciting possibilities of dryer lint as a material. Linking back to the Lint’s origin, I designed a proposal for a circular economy within the community of the Laundromat, allowing patrons to sell their lint made goods. PROJECT BRIEF I want to explore how environmentally friendly products are targeted toward individual consumers vs. sustainable system alternatives. Looking at the waste in laundromats, how can this shared community space be transformed into an area that makes sustainable alternatives monetarily accessible, with an emphasis on promoting less toxic laundry habits and a focus on creating a better community space. Sustainable can be a large ambiguous term, but I want to focus on waste, and how to divert waste from landfills, with some consideration for the social and environmental impacts of its production. I wanted to explore systems or products that reward consumers in a community model to form environmentally friendly habits. I want to convey that we are a part of Nature, not separate from it.
    [Show full text]