Denzel Washington
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Copyright material – 9781844574841 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS VI INTRODUCTION 1 1 STARDOM AND THE POLITICS OF REPRESENTATION 15 2 AFTER BLAXPLOITATION, BEFORE NEW JACK CINEMA 34 3 ACADEMY AWARD-WINNING ACTOR 62 4 ONE OF AMERICA’S FAVOURITE MOVIE STARS 90 5 BLUES DETECTIVES 115 CONCLUSION 135 NOTES 141 BIBLIOGRAPHY 145 FILMOGRAPHY 155 INDEX 158 Copyright material – 9781844574841 INTRODUCTION Star studies are deceptive. They seem like fun, easy projects, when in reality they are arduous ventures beset by countless pitfalls. The actor (whose creative labour produces the performances) can become obscured by the star (associated with existential qualities). It is difficult to accurately assess the industrial, cultural and aesthetic factors that shape audience perspectives and actors’ careers. There are no straightforward ways to connect star studies with accounts, for example, of African-American cinema. Even ‘star image’ is an ambiguous term. Martin Shingler notes that star studies can (and should) consider a host of issues, including ‘a performer’s star qualities and idiolect, their career trajectory … the significance of collaborators … the emergence of their type and star vehicles’ (2012: 183). Beyond this, these studies will show how ‘stars embody, incarnate or personify social groups or historical moments, [and negotiate] ideological contradictions that emerge within or between social groups’; on the flip side, they also aim to clarify ‘how certain types of audiences or members of a specific social group … have engaged with and made use of stars at particular historical moments’ (ibid.). Juggling disparate visions of stardom, these studies consider how a star functions as ‘an industrial marketing device’, a meaning- producing element within films and a working professional involved in the fields of art and performance (Gledhill 1991a: xiii). I N T R O D U C T I O N 1 Copyright material – 9781844574841 A study of Denzel Washington must also address the vast literature on representational politics, stardom and the entertainment industry, and African Americans’ roles in American popular culture. It should consider his more than forty leading roles in films released over several decades, work that has led to: hours of film; scores of reviews, interviews and articles connected to each film; an abundance of chat show interviews, award show speeches and fan videos. His career and performances are analysed in the popular press, biographies (including several for young readers) and studies by scholars such as Donald Bogle and Melvin Donalson. As in commentary about other film stars, articles by fans and the press tend to discuss Washington’s performances as windows into his actual identity. A small set of details about his personality, beliefs and private life is recirculated by entertainment news, fan clubs and the websites of individual fans. In most instances, fan commentary is consistent with the public image crafted by Washington’s professional publicity team. With fans and journalists focused on the circumscribed and mostly scandal-free details about Washington’s private life, his film roles – and acting awards – are especially important aspects of his public image. With details about his personal life pared down to agent-authorised information, Washington’s off-screen life has not generated a significant distance between the star and his films. Instead, audiences seem inclined to see Washington as a reflection of his well-managed public bio and his films, especially in regular-guy roles. As with other stars, one can, and I will, discuss Washington’s star image as an evolving, figurative, discursive image reflecting ‘film roles, publicity, promotion and gossip’ associated with the actor; his star image can be understood as an ‘intertextual phenomenon born out of the actor’s previous roles, various filmic properties and publicity’, which is distinct from the actor and the fictional roles he has played (Shingler 2012: 183, 43). However, the close connection between Washington’s roles and the public’s ideas 2 D E N Z E L WA S H I N G T O N Copyright material – 9781844574841 about him might make it useful for future studies to employ other terms used in star studies, such as picture personality or persona. Richard deCordova makes a distinction between star image and picture personality, which emerges from ‘a history of appearances in films’ and amounts to ‘a personality gleaned [primarily] from those appearances’ (1990: 92). Similarly, Christine Gledhill separates star image from persona. She finds that ‘the major sites for elaborating star personae exist outside films in studio promotion departments, publicity agencies, newspaper and broadcast journalism, TV chat shows, film criticism, and so on’ (1991b: 217). By comparison, the star image ‘is spun off from the persona and film roles, both condensing and dispersing desires, meanings, values and styles that are current in the culture’ (ibid.). Noting considerations raised by Richard Dyer and Steven Heath, Gledhill observes that a star image is not only ‘fragmented and open to contradiction … the rise of particular stars can be traced to their condensation of values felt to be under threat or in flux at a particular moment in time’ (ibid.). Thus, only some stars should be discussed in terms of a star image that can ‘incarnate or embody ideological values, coming to define specific moments in history’ (Shingler 2012: 149). Other studies could examine Washington’s roles and public image to determine if one should discuss his star persona rather than star image. They could consider the degree to which his stardom captures a moment in history, and so warrants analysis as a star image in the narrow sense. Paul Robeson’s multidimensional career has been seen as embodying the complexities of ‘blackness and masculinity’ in the pre-civil rights era (Dyer 1986: x). Sidney Poitier has been seen as ‘an icon of the American postwar integrationist movement and black middle-class masculinity’ (Shingler 2012: 149). Washington could be comparably significant. Donalson sees Washington’s career expanding the complexity of roles associated with ‘black masculinity, achieving [the] normality, depth, and I N T R O D U C T I O N 3 Copyright material – 9781844574841 humanity too often excised from earlier decades of extreme representations’ (2012: 84). I share Donalson’s view that Washington’s ‘contributions to and effect upon the images of black men have been crucial, significant, and historic’ (2012: 84), and see several reasons why his work has had an impact. Looking at Washington’s career alongside the numerous African-American musicians, athletes, writers, politicians and even academics prominent in mainstream American society, one could argue that his star image resonates with many audiences because it reflects the values and experiences of what Trey Ellis termed in 1989 the New Black Aesthetic (NBA), developed by the rising number of cultural mulattoes ‘educated by a multi-racial mix of cultures’ who grew up as the first generation of African Americans not to have their lives defined by legalised segregation (2003: 189). While Washington is on the early cusp of the NBA generation, born in 1954 (whereas, for example, Spike Lee was born in 1957 and Ellis in 1962), his image reflects tropes and conditions entirely different from those shaping the public images of Sidney Poitier (b. 1927) or Bill Cosby (b. 1937). Factors shaping Washington’s career choices have caused his image to reflect a complex intertwining of Black Nationalist and black bourgeois perspectives. Still sharing those values, work by younger NBA artists like John Singleton (b. 1968) sometimes reveals the significant influence of figures like Ice Cube (b. 1969) by focusing on urban environments and the oppositional stance of gangsta culture. Thus, there are various iterations of the New Black Aesthetic; contrasting and evolving perspectives on Washington’s career reflect shifting views of NBA masculinity and identity, which are open to contradiction because they exist ‘somewhere between the poles of … the race man and the nigga, … the true civil rights generation and … the hip hop generation’ (Boyd 2002: 6). I will let others decide if Washington’s public image symbolises, in some singular way, notions of race, gender and sexuality in the 4 D E N Z E L WA S H I N G T O N Copyright material – 9781844574841 post-civil rights era, and so is a star image, narrowly defined. However, throughout the book, I will explore the cultural and industrial factors that have led to Washington’s success in mainstream American cinema, and prompted divergent responses to his identities as a black matinee idol, award-winning actor and commercial success. To balance my discussions that frame Washington as a cultural sign, I will also examine his performances as ‘signifiers … that are patterned into structures that have meaning for the spectator’ (Butler 1991: 11). Focusing on any star’s image or body as a single sign obscures meanings created by the actor’s performance choices. Given Washington’s star image, one needs to analyse roles and performances that have led him to be known and marketed as an Academy Award-winning actor. Washington is a star performer and prestige star whose public image, financial success, critical acclaim, cultural significance and industry position are linked in some way to public recognition of his acting ability. I will inevitably discuss Washington as a person with existential traits, if only to acknowledge that like any star, the path to recognition has been ‘long and arduous, requiring patience, stamina and determination as well as talent and star quality’ (Shingler 2012: 120). Yet I aim to analyse Washington as a performer, in a way that is comparable to discussing John McLaughlin as a guitarist or Ozzie Smith as a baseball player. My focus is on evidence of skill, technical proficiency and accomplishments that result from preparation and imagination, as well as the professional’s ability and labour to excel in an area of endeavour.