DOCSLIB.ORG

Quarterly Enforcement Report 4/1/02 - 6/30/02

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Quarterly Enforcement Report 4/1/02 - 6/30/02 QUARTERLY ENFORCEMENT REPORT 4/1/02 - 6/30/02 SANCTION CASE NUMBER NAME ACTION AMOUNT SANCTION CASE TYPE CLOSED DATE ORD ASSESS 1999NE030021 OZONE INDUSTRIES CIVIL PENALTY 5000 DOLLARS MAINTENANCE 04/01/02 CP COMPROMIS 1999SO230029 GE-CELMA NO FINDING 2800 DOLLARS MAINTENANCE 04/01/02 INDUSTRIAL ORD ASSESS 1994SW170085 HELICOPTERS INC CIVIL PENALTY 8000 DOLLARS DRUG TESTING 04/02/02 B/E AEROSPACE 1997EA250006 SERVICES DIVISION CIVIL PENALTY 45000 DOLLARS MAINTENANCE 04/03/02 BAY LAND AVIATION ORD ASSESS 2000EA910025 INC CIVIL PENALTY 11000 DOLLARS DRUG TESTING 04/04/02 NORTHERN PLAINS CERTIFICATE 2001GL210029 AVIATION INC REVOCATION REVOCATION OTHER 04/05/02 RYAN INTERNATIONAL ORD ASSESS 1997GL760139 AIRLINES INC CIVIL PENALTY 8000 SANCTION WAIVED DRUG TESTING 04/05/02 FRONTIER AIRLINES CERTIFICATE 1999NM910091 INC REVOCATION REVOCATION FLT OPNS 04/05/02 AMERICAN AIRLINES ORD ASSESS 2000EA720511 INC CIVIL PENALTY 1100 DOLLARS MAINTENANCE 04/08/02 B W I A INTERNATIONAL ORD ASSESS 1997SO230061 AIRWAYS LTD CIVIL PENALTY 500 DOLLARS MAINTENANCE 04/08/02 1 QUARTERLY ENFORCEMENT REPORT 4/1/02 - 6/30/02 SANCTION CASE NUMBER NAME ACTION AMOUNT SANCTION CASE TYPE CLOSED DATE B W I A INTERNATIONAL ORD ASSESS 1997SO230061 AIRWAYS LTD CIVIL PENALTY 750000 DOLLARS FLT OPNS 04/08/02 BAAN HOFMAN CHERYL dba BAAN ORD ASSESS 1998NM910086 AIRE CIVIL PENALTY 22000 SANCTION WAIVED MAINTENANCE 04/08/02 AVIANCE ORD ASSESS 2000SO950105 INTERNATIONAL INC CIVIL PENALTY 2000 DOLLARS FLT OPNS 04/08/02 CERTIFICATE 2000SW090014 GO HELICOPTERS INC REVOCATION REVOCATION MAINTENANCE 04/09/02 CP COMPROMIS 2000SO170029 LEARJET INC NO FINDING 1000 DOLLARS MAINTENANCE 04/10/02 ORD ASSESS 2001NM020120 ALASKA AIRLINES INC CIVIL PENALTY 5000 DOLLARS FLT OPNS 04/10/02 ORD ASSESS 2001SW050001 C AND M MARINE INC CIVIL PENALTY 6000 DOLLARS DRUG TESTING 04/10/02 CONTINENTAL ORD ASSESS 2000SW910100 AIRLINES INC CIVIL PENALTY 1500 DOLLARS RECORDS/RPTS 04/11/02 PIEDMONT AVIATION ORD ASSESS 2000SO050045 SERVICES INC CIVIL PENALTY 14000 DOLLARS MAINTENANCE 04/11/02 2 QUARTERLY ENFORCEMENT REPORT 4/1/02 - 6/30/02 SANCTION CASE NUMBER NAME ACTION AMOUNT SANCTION CASE TYPE CLOSED DATE HELICOPTER AVIATION SERVICES ORD ASSESS 2000SO950177 CORP CP HMT 25500 DOLLARS HAZ MAT 04/11/02 ORD ASSESS 2002NM050002 WOLFF AVIATION L L C CIVIL PENALTY 27900 DOLLARS MAINTENANCE 04/12/02 ORD ASSESS 2002NM050003 WOLFF AVIATION L L C CP HMT 50000 DOLLARS HAZ MAT 04/12/02 ORD ASSESS 2002NM050004 WOLFF AVIATION L L C CIVIL PENALTY 1650 DOLLARS MAINTENANCE 04/12/02 MIAMI AIR ORD ASSESS 1998SO190032 INTERNATIONAL INC CIVIL PENALTY 37400 DOLLARS QUAL CONTROL 04/12/02 ATLANTIC COAST ORD ASSESS 2000EA270054 AIRLINES CIVIL PENALTY 4000 DOLLARS FLT OPNS 04/15/02 CP CONTINENTAL COMPROMIS 2000GL250023 EXPRESS INC NO FINDING 5000 DOLLARS FLT OPNS 04/15/02 AEROVIAS ORD ASSESS 2001SO230003 VENEZOLANAS S A CIVIL PENALTY 14999 DOLLARS MAINTENANCE 04/15/02 AEROVIAS ORD ASSESS 2001SO230046 VENEZOLANAS S A CIVIL PENALTY 1000 DOLLARS MAINTENANCE 04/16/02 3 QUARTERLY ENFORCEMENT REPORT 4/1/02 - 6/30/02 SANCTI ON CASE NUMBER NAME ACTION AMOUNT SANCTION CASE TYPE CLOSED DATE ORD ASSESS 2001SW090036 RAAC INC CIVIL PENALTY 2000 DOLLARS MAINTENANCE 04/16/02 ALM DUTCH ORD ASSESS 1997SO210034 ANTILLEAN AIRLINES CIVIL PENALTY 1000 DOLLARS MAINTENANCE 04/16/02 AIRTRAN AIRLINES ORD ASSESS 1998SO110060 INC CP HMT 11250 DOLLARS HAZ MAT 04/16/02 AIRTRAN AIRWAYS ORD ASSESS 1999SO150186 INC CIVIL PENALTY 11000 DOLLARS FLT OPNS 04/16/02 TRANSNORTHERN ORD ASSESS 2000AL030150 AVIATION INC CIVIL PENALTY 2000 DOLLARS DRUG TESTING 04/17/02 TRANSNORTHERN ORD ASSESS 2002AL030007 AVIATION INC CIVIL PENALTY 7500 DOLLARS MAINTENANCE 04/17/02 BOEING COMMERCIAL ORD ASSESS 2001NM420013 AIRPLANE GROUP CIVIL PENALTY 8000 DOLLARS MAINTENANCE 04/17/02 ORD ASSESS 2001EA170007 SPIRIT AIRLINES INC CIVIL PENALTY 5000 DOLLARS OTHER 04/17/02 EVERGREEN ORD ASSESS 2001NM090091 HELICOPTERS INC CIVIL PENALTY 6500 DOLLARS MAINTENANCE 04/18/02 4 QUARTERLY ENFORCEMENT REPORT 4/1/02 - 6/30/02 SANCTION CASE NUMBER NAME ACTION AMOUNT SANCTION CASE TYPE CLOSED DATE DEE HOWARD AIRCRAFT ORD ASSESS CONSOLIDATED 2001SW910053 MAINTENANCE L P CIVIL PENALTY CASE MAINTENANCE 04/18/02 CP ROBLEX AVIATION COMPROMIS 1999GL910100 COMPANY NO FINDING 5500 DOLLARS FLT OPNS 04/18/02 ORD ASSESS 1999SO010118 DELTA AIR LINES INC CIVIL PENALTY 4500 DOLLARS FLT OPNS 04/18/02 ORD ASSESS 1999SO270002 DELTA AIR LINES INC CIVIL PENALTY 250 DOLLARS TYPE DESGN DATA 04/18/02 CP COMPROMIS 1999SO270141 DELTA AIR LINES INC NO FINDING 1000 DOLLARS FLT OPNS 04/19/02 ORD ASSESS 1999SO270151 DELTA AIR LINES INC CIVIL PENALTY 15000 DOLLARS MAINTENANCE 04/19/02 ORD ASSESS 1999SO270158 DELTA AIR LINES INC CIVIL PENALTY 7500 DOLLARS FLT OPNS 04/19/02 CONTINENTAL ORD ASSESS 1999SO720080 AIRLINES INC CIVIL PENALTY 25000 DOLLARS DRUG TESTING 04/19/02 ORD ASSESS 2000SO270004 DELTA AIR LINES INC CIVIL PENALTY 2200 DOLLARS MAINTENANCE 04/19/02 5 QUARTERLY ENFORCEMENT REPORT 4/1/02 - 6/30/02 SANCTION CASE NUMBER NAME ACTION AMOUNT SANCTION CASE TYPE CLOSED DATE ORD ASSESS 2001CE050009 OZARK AIR LINES INC CIVIL PENALTY 1100 DOLLARS FLT OPNS 04/19/02 CP FEDERAL EXPRESS COMPROMIS 2001NM710517 CORP NO FINDING 5000 DOLLARS MAINTENANCE 04/22/02 FEDERAL EXPRESS ORD ASSESS 2002NM710078 CORP CIVIL PENALTY 8000 DOLLARS MAINTENANCE 04/22/02 BOMBARDIER CP SERVICES COMPROMIS 2001GL050002 CORPORATION NO FINDING 750 DOLLARS FLT OPNS 04/23/02 EVERGREEN INTERNATIONAL ORD ASSESS 2001NM090065 AIRLINES INC CIVIL PENALTY 20000 DOLLARS MAINTENANCE 04/23/02 TRANSBRASIL ORD ASSESS 1999SO710300 AIRLINES CIVIL PENALTY 20000 DOLLARS MAINTENANCE 04/23/02 TRANSBRAsIL ORD ASSESS 1999SO760267 AIRLINES CIVIL PENALTY 4000 DOLLARS DRUG TESTING 04/23/02 AIR WISCONSIN CP AIRLINES COMPROMIS 2001GL310009 CORPORATION NO FINDING 250 DOLLARS FLT OPNS 04/25/02 AIR WISCONSIN AIRLINES ORD ASSESS 2001GL310018 CORPORATION CIVIL PENALTY 500 DOLLARS DRUG TESTING 04/26/02 6 QUARTERLY ENFORCEMENT REPORT 4/1/02 - 6/30/02 SANCTION CASE NUMBER NAME ACTION AMOUNT SANCTION CASE TYPE CLOSED DATE ORD ASSESS 2001NM070186 SCENIC AVIATION INC CIVIL PENALTY 5000 DOLLARS HAZ MAT 04/26/02 SOUTHWEST ORD ASSESS 2001WP730055 AIRLINES CO CIVIL PENALTY 12000 DOLLARS DRUG TESTING 04/26/02 CHEVRON USA PRODUCTION ORD ASSESS 2000SW030064 COMPANY CIVIL PENALTY 3500 DOLLARS HAZ MAT 04/29/02 ORD ASSESS 1999SO710146 DELTA AIR LINES INC CIVIL PENALTY 9000 DOLLARS MAINTENANCE 04/29/02 ORD ASSESS 1999SW910121 CARIBBEAN HELICORP CIVIL PENALTY 7500 DOLLARS MAINTENANCE 04/30/02 ORD ASSESS 1999SO750031 DELTA AIR LINES INC CIVIL PENALTY 500 DOLLARS DRUG TESTING 04/30/02 RACO HELICOPTERS ORD ASSESS 2001EA250007 CORP CIVIL PENALTY 8000 DOLLARS MAINTENANCE 04/30/02 ORD ASSESS 2001SO230067 LADECO S A CIVIL PENALTY 825 DOLLARS DRUG TESTING 04/30/02 2001NM130041 JET SYSTEMS INC CIVIL PENALTY 96800 DOLLARS QUAL CONTROL 05/01/02 7 QUARTERLY ENFORCEMENT REPORT 4/1/02 - 6/30/02 SANCTION CASE NUMBER NAME ACTION AMOUNT SANCTION CASE TYPE CLOSED DATE EXECUTIVE AIRLINES ORD ASSESS 1998SO210086 INC CIVIL PENALTY 30000 DOLLARS MAINTENANCE 05/01/02 KOREAN AIRLINES ORD ASSESS 2000NM710191 LTD CIVIL PENALTY 1100 DOLLARS MAINTENANCE 05/01/02 ORD ASSESS 2001NM710030 ALASKA AIRLINES INC CIVIL PENALTY 6000 DOLLARS DRUG TESTING 05/01/02 ORD ASSESS 1999WP270026 ALASKA AIRLINES INC CIVIL PENALTY 20000 DOLLARS FLT OPNS 05/02/02 FEDERAL EXPRESS ORD ASSESS 2000GL760296 CORP CIVIL PENALTY 22000 DOLLARS FLT OPNS 05/02/02 SOUTHWEST ORD ASSESS 2000NM070176 AIRLINES CO CIVIL PENALTY 5000 DOLLARS MAINTENANCE 05/02/02 ORD ASSESS 2001CE010026 FLIGHT EXPRESS INC CP HMT 10000 DOLLARS HAZ MAT 05/02/02 NORTH VANCOUVER ORD ASSESS 2000NM710629 AIRLINES LTD CIVIL PENALTY 1000 DOLLARS DRUG TESTING 05/03/02 JOHN OSTRAT ORD ASSESS 2000WP910018 COMPANY INC CIVIL PENALTY 3000 DOLLARS FLT OPNS 05/03/02 8 QUARTERLY ENFORCEMENT REPORT 4/1/02 - 6/30/02 SANCTION CASE NUMBER NAME ACTION AMOUNT SANCTION CASE TYPE CLOSED DATE ORD ASSESS 2001GL270021 SCOTTS AIR AG INC CIVIL PENALTY 749 DOLLARS MAINTENANCE 05/06/02 AMERICAN EAGLE ORD ASSESS 2001SW210031 AIRLINES INC CIVIL PENALTY 1000 DOLLARS AIRCRAFT ALTR 05/07/02 VALLEY AIR ORD ASSESS 2000SW910012 SERVICES, INC. CIVIL PENALTY 1000 DOLLARS MAINTENANCE 05/07/02 CESSNA AIRCRAFT CERTIFICATE 2001SW170075 COMPANY REVOCATION REVOCATION MAINTENANCE 05/07/02 TOTAL FLIGHT ORD ASSESS 1999SO110076 SYSTEMS INC CIVIL PENALTY 2500 DOLLARS MAINTENANCE 05/07/02 WISCONSIN AVIATION ORD ASSESS 2001GL130015 INC CIVIL PENALTY 500 DOLLARS MAINTENANCE 05/07/02 TEXAS AIR CHARTERS ORD ASSESS 2001SW190027 INC CP HMT 10000 DOLLARS HAZ MAT 05/08/02 ORD ASSESS 2000EA720519 DELTA AIR LINES INC CIVIL PENALTY 1100 DOLLARS MAINTENANCE 05/08/02 ADVANTAGE AIR ORD ASSESS 2000SW170019 CHARTER INC CIVIL PENALTY 3000 DOLLARS RECORDS/RPTS 05/09/02 ADVANTAGE AIR ORD ASSESS 2000SW170028 CHARTER INC CIVIL PENALTY 5000 DOLLARS OTHER 05/09/02 9 QUARTERLY ENFORCEMENT REPORT 4/1/02 - 6/30/02 SANCTION CASE NUMBER NAME ACTION AMOUNT SANCTION CASE TYPE CLOSED DATE ELLIOTT AVIATION ORD ASSESS 2001CE010027 FLIGHT SERVICES INC CIVIL PENALTY 1400 DOLLARS MAINTENANCE 05/09/02 TRANS STATES ORD ASSESS 2001CE030048 AIRLINES INC CIVIL PENALTY 7500 DOLLARS HAZ MAT 05/10/02 AIRTRAN AIRWAYS ORD ASSESS 2001EA270022 INC CIVIL PENALTY 550 DOLLARS MAINTENANCE 05/10/02 HORIZON AIR ORD ASSESS 2001NM090040 INDUSTRIES INC CIVIL PENALTY 1000 DOLLARS RECORDS/RPTS 05/13/02 ST CHARLES FLYING ORD ASSESS 1997CE030021 SERVICE INC CIVIL PENALTY 2000 DOLLARS MAINTENANCE 05/13/02 ORD ASSESS 1998WP290032 UNITED AIR LINES INC CIVIL PENALTY 4000 DOLLARS MAINTENANCE 05/13/02
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lambert-St. Louis International Airport®
    Lambert-St. Louis International Airport® Rhonda Hamm-Niebruegge Director Rhonda Hamm-Niebruegge was appointed Director of Lambert-St. Louis International Airport by St. Louis City Mayor Francis Slay in the fall of 2009 and assumed the job in January 2010. The Airport is the primary air carrier facility for the St. Louis region handling over 14 million passengers annually. Ms. Hamm-Niebruegge manages nearly 500 employees with revenues averaging 165 million dollars annually. She is also Chairwoman of the 17- member St. Louis Airport Commission. Prior to Lambert, Ms. Hamm-Niebruegge logged 25 years in aviation management positions with American Airlines, Trans World Airlines (TWA) and Ozark Air Lines; a majority of her career has been based in St. Louis, Missouri. Ms. Hamm-Niebruegge was most recently the Managing Director of American Airlines’ St. Louis operation, a position she held beginning in 2002. Before the American and TWA merger, she held the position of Vice President of TWA’s North American Operations, responsible for an $800 million budget encompassing 100 airports and 8,000 TWA employees. Ms. Hamm-Niebruegge’s airline management resume began in 1984 as a customer service agent for Ozark Airlines in New York City. Ozark’s merger with TWA brought her to the St. Louis hub where she took on roles of Supervisor Administration, Ramp Supervisor, Manager Passenger Services and ultimately into high-level operations management positions which require negotiations with airports in areas of leases, operations, renovations and security. Ms. Hamm-Niebruegge is engaged in numerous St. Louis business and civic organizations, including board memberships in the Regional Commerce and Growth Association, the John Cook School of Business at Saint Louis University and St.
    [Show full text]
  • 363 Part 238—Contracts With
    Immigration and Naturalization Service, Justice § 238.3 (2) The country where the alien was mented on Form I±420. The contracts born; with transportation lines referred to in (3) The country where the alien has a section 238(c) of the Act shall be made residence; or by the Commissioner on behalf of the (4) Any country willing to accept the government and shall be documented alien. on Form I±426. The contracts with (c) Contiguous territory and adjacent transportation lines desiring their pas- islands. Any alien ordered excluded who sengers to be preinspected at places boarded an aircraft or vessel in foreign outside the United States shall be contiguous territory or in any adjacent made by the Commissioner on behalf of island shall be deported to such foreign the government and shall be docu- contiguous territory or adjacent island mented on Form I±425; except that con- if the alien is a native, citizen, subject, tracts for irregularly operated charter or national of such foreign contiguous flights may be entered into by the Ex- territory or adjacent island, or if the ecutive Associate Commissioner for alien has a residence in such foreign Operations or an Immigration Officer contiguous territory or adjacent is- designated by the Executive Associate land. Otherwise, the alien shall be de- Commissioner for Operations and hav- ported, in the first instance, to the ing jurisdiction over the location country in which is located the port at where the inspection will take place. which the alien embarked for such for- [57 FR 59907, Dec. 17, 1992] eign contiguous territory or adjacent island.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE on AIR LAW (Montréal, 20 April to 2
    DCCD Doc No. 28 28/4/09 (English only) INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AIR LAW (Montréal, 20 April to 2 May 2009) CONVENTION ON COMPENSATION FOR DAMAGE CAUSED BY AIRCRAFT TO THIRD PARTIES AND CONVENTION ON COMPENSATION FOR DAMAGE TO THIRD PARTIES, RESULTING FROM ACTS OF UNLAWFUL INTERFERENCE INVOLVING AIRCRAFT (Presented by the Air Crash Victims Families Group) 1. INTRODUCTION – SUPPLEMENTAL AND OTHER COMPENSATIONS 1.1 The apocalyptic terrorist attack by the means of four hi-jacked planes committed against the World Trade Center in New York, NY , the Pentagon in Arlington, VA and the aborted flight ending in a crash in the rural area in Shankville, PA ON September 11th, 2001 is the only real time example that triggered this proposed Convention on Compensation for Damage to Third Parties from Acts of Unlawful Interference Involving Aircraft. 1.2 It is therefore important to look towards the post incident resolution of this tragedy in order to adequately and pro actively complete ONE new General Risk Convention (including compensation for ALL catastrophic damages) for the twenty first century. 2. DISCUSSION 2.1 Immediately after September 11th, 2001 – the Government and Congress met with all affected and interested parties resulting in the “Air Transportation Safety and System Stabilization Act” (Public Law 107-42-Sept. 22,2001). 2.2 This Law provided the basis for Rules and Regulations for: a) Airline Stabilization; b) Aviation Insurance; c) Tax Provisions; d) Victims Compensation; and e) Air Transportation Safety. DCCD Doc No. 28 - 2 - 2.3 The Airline Stabilization Act created the legislative vehicle needed to reimburse the air transport industry for their losses of income as a result of the flight interruption due to the 911 attack.
    [Show full text]
  • Change 3, FAA Order 7340.2A Contractions
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CHANGE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 7340.2A CHG 3 SUBJ: CONTRACTIONS 1. PURPOSE. This change transmits revised pages to Order JO 7340.2A, Contractions. 2. DISTRIBUTION. This change is distributed to select offices in Washington and regional headquarters, the William J. Hughes Technical Center, and the Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center; to all air traffic field offices and field facilities; to all airway facilities field offices; to all international aviation field offices, airport district offices, and flight standards district offices; and to the interested aviation public. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. July 29, 2010. 4. EXPLANATION OF CHANGES. Changes, additions, and modifications (CAM) are listed in the CAM section of this change. Changes within sections are indicated by a vertical bar. 5. DISPOSITION OF TRANSMITTAL. Retain this transmittal until superseded by a new basic order. 6. PAGE CONTROL CHART. See the page control chart attachment. Y[fa\.Uj-Koef p^/2, Nancy B. Kalinowski Vice President, System Operations Services Air Traffic Organization Date: k/^///V/<+///0 Distribution: ZAT-734, ZAT-464 Initiated by: AJR-0 Vice President, System Operations Services 7/29/10 JO 7340.2A CHG 3 PAGE CONTROL CHART REMOVE PAGES DATED INSERT PAGES DATED CAM−1−1 through CAM−1−2 . 4/8/10 CAM−1−1 through CAM−1−2 . 7/29/10 1−1−1 . 8/27/09 1−1−1 . 7/29/10 2−1−23 through 2−1−27 . 4/8/10 2−1−23 through 2−1−27 . 7/29/10 2−2−28 . 4/8/10 2−2−28 . 4/8/10 2−2−23 .
    [Show full text]
  • A Free Bird Sings the Song of the Caged: Southwest Airlines' Fight to Repeal the Wright Amendment John Grantham
    Journal of Air Law and Commerce Volume 72 | Issue 2 Article 10 2007 A Free Bird Sings the Song of the Caged: Southwest Airlines' Fight to Repeal the Wright Amendment John Grantham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc Recommended Citation John Grantham, A Free Bird Sings the Song of the Caged: Southwest Airlines' Fight to Repeal the Wright Amendment, 72 J. Air L. & Com. 429 (2007) https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc/vol72/iss2/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Air Law and Commerce by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. A FREE BIRD SINGS THE SONG OF THE CAGED: SOUTHWEST AIRLINES' FIGHT TO REPEAL THE WRIGHT AMENDMENT JOHN GRANTHAM* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................. 430 II. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND .................... 432 A. THE BATTLE TO ESTABLISH AIRPORTS IN NORTH T EXAS .......................................... 433 B. PLANNING FOR THE SUCCESS OF THE NEW AIRPORT ........................................ 436 C. THE UNEXPECTED BATTLE FOR AIRPORT CONSOLIDATION ................................... 438 III. THE EXCEPTION TO DEREGULATION ......... 440 A. THE DEREGULATION OF AIRLINE TRAVEL ......... 440 B. DEFINING THE WRIGHT AMENDMENT RESTRICTIONS ................................... 444 C. EXPANDING THE WRIGHT AMENDMENT ........... 447 D. SOUTHWEST COMES OUT AGAINST THE LoVE FIELD RESTRICTIONS ............................... 452 E. THE END OF AN ERA OR THE START OF SOMETHING NEW .................................. 453 IV. THE WRIGHT POLICY ............................ 455 A. COMMERCE CLAUSE ................................. 456 B. THE WRIGHT AMENDMENT WILL REMAIN STRONG LAW IF ALLOWED .................................. 456 1. ConstitutionalIssues ......................... 456 2. Deference to Administrative Agency Interpretation...............................
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Accident Report Ozark Air Lines, Inc
    SA- None File No. 1-0039 AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT REPORT OZARK AIR LINES, INC. DOUGLAS DC-9-15, N974Z SIOUX CITY AIRPORT SIOUX CITY, IOWA DECEMBER 27,1968 ADOPTED: SEPTEMBER 2, 1970 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD Bureau 'of Aviation Safety Washington, 0. C. 20591 , OZARK AIR LINES, INC. DOUGLAS DC-9-15, N974Z SIOUX CITY AIRPORT SIOUX CITY, IOWA DECEMBER 27. 1968 TABLE OF CONTENTS Synopsis 1 Probable Cause 2 1. Investigation 3 1.1 History of Flight 3 1.2 Injuries to Persons 7 1.3 Damage to Aircraft 7 1.4 Other Damage 7 1.5 Crew Information 8 1.6 Aircraft Information 8 1.7 Meteorological Information 10 1.8 Aids to Navigation 11 1.9 Communications 11 1.10 Aerodrome and Ground Facilities 11 1.11 Flight Recorders 12 1.12 Wreckage 15 1.13 Fire 16 1.14 Survival Aspects 17 1.15 Tests and Research 19 1.16 Other Information 21 (a) Stall Warning 21 (b) Anti-icing System 21 (c) Speed Control-Lift InstrumentationSystem 22 (d) Stall Recovery Incidents 22 2. Analysis and Conclusions 24 2.1 Analysis 24 2.2 Conclusions 29 (a) Findings 29 (b) Probable Cause 30 3. Recommendations 31 Appendices Attachment File No. 1-0039 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD DEPARTMENT PF TRANSPORTATION AIRCRAF'f ACCIDENT REPORT Mooted: Seotember 2.1970 OZARK AIR LINES, INC. DOUGLAS DC-9-15. N974Z SIOUX CITY AIRPORT, SIOUX CITY, IOWA DECEMBER 27, 1968 SYNOPSIS At approximately 0711 c.8.t. on December 27, 1968,._O_zark Atr -. Lines Flight 982, a I_-Douglas ~ DC-9, crashed while *=off from the Sioux City Airport, Sioux City,' Iowa.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of U.S. Commercial Domestic Aircraft Operations from 1991 to 2010
    THE EVOLUTION OF U.S. COMMERCIAL DOMESTIC AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS FROM 1991 TO 2010 by MASSACHUSETTS INSTME OF TECHNOLOGY ALEXANDER ANDREW WULZ UL02 1 B.S., Aerospace Engineering University of Notre Dame (2008) Submitted to the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics in PartialFulfillment of the Requirementsfor the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2012 0 2012 Alexander Andrew Wulz. All rights reserved. .The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. Signature of Author ..................................................................... .. ...................... Department of Aeronautr and Astronautics n n May 11, 2012 Certified by ............................................................................ Peter P. Belobaba Principle Research Scientist of Aeronautics and Astronautics / Thesis Supervisor A ccepted by ................................................................... Eytan H. Modiano Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Chair, Graduate Program Committee 1 PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 THE EVOLUTION OF U.S. COMMERCIAL DOMESTIC AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS FROM 1991 TO 2010 by ALEXANDER ANDREW WULZ Submitted to the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics on May 11, 2012 in PartialFulfillment of the Requirementsfor the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN AERONAUTICS AND ASTRONAUTICS ABSTRACT The main objective of this thesis is to explore the evolution of U.S. commercial domestic aircraft operations from 1991 to 2010 and describe the implications for future U.S. commercial domestic fleets. Using data collected from the U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics, we analyze 110 different aircraft types from 145 airlines operating U.S. commercial domestic service between 1991 and 2010. We classify the aircraft analyzed into four categories: turboprop, regional jet, narrow-body, and wide-body.
    [Show full text]
  • 1.4. Coding and Decoding of Airlines 1.4.1. Coding Of
    1.4. CODING AND DECODING OF AIRLINES 1.4.1. CODING OF AIRLINES In addition to the airlines' full names in alphabetical order the list below also contains: - Column 1: the airlines' prefix numbers (Cargo) - Column 2: the airlines' 2 character designators - Column 3: the airlines' 3 letter designators A Explanation of symbols: + IATA Member & IATA Associate Member * controlled duplication # Party to the IATA Standard Interline Traffic Agreement (see section 8.1.1.) © Cargo carrier only Full name of carrier 1 2 3 40-Mile Air, Ltd. Q5 MLA AAA - Air Alps Aviation A6 LPV AB Varmlandsflyg T9 ABX Air, Inc. © 832 GB Ada Air + 121 ZY ADE Adria Airways + # 165 JP ADR Aegean Airlines S.A. + # 390 A3 AEE Aer Arann Express (Comharbairt Gaillimh Teo) 809 RE REA Aeris SH AIS Aer Lingus Limited + # 053 EI EIN Aero Airlines A.S. 350 EE Aero Asia International Ltd. + # 532 E4 Aero Benin S.A. EM Aero California + 078 JR SER Aero-Charter 187 DW UCR Aero Continente 929 N6 ACQ Aero Continente Dominicana 9D Aero Express Del Ecuador - Trans AM © 144 7T Aero Honduras S.A. d/b/a/ Sol Air 4S Aero Lineas Sosa P4 Aero Lloyd Flugreisen GmbH & Co. YP AEF Aero Republica S.A. 845 P5 RPB Aero Zambia + # 509 Z9 Aero-Condor S.A. Q6 Aero Contractors Company of Nigeria Ltd. AJ NIG Aero-Service BF Aerocaribe 723 QA CBE Aerocaribbean S.A. 164 7L CRN Aerocontinente Chile S.A. C7 Aeroejecutivo S.A. de C.V. 456 SX AJO Aeroflot Russian Airlines + # 555 SU AFL Aeroflot-Don 733 D9 DNV Aerofreight Airlines JSC RS Aeroline GmbH 7E AWU Aerolineas Argentinas + # 044 AR ARG Aerolineas Centrales de Colombia (ACES) + 137 VX AES Aerolineas de Baleares AeBal 059 DF ABH Aerolineas Dominicanas S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Airline Mergers, Acquisitions and Bankruptcies: Will the Collective Bargaining Agreement Survive Jonni Walls
    Journal of Air Law and Commerce Volume 56 | Issue 3 Article 7 1991 Airline Mergers, Acquisitions and Bankruptcies: Will the Collective Bargaining Agreement Survive Jonni Walls Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc Recommended Citation Jonni Walls, Airline Mergers, Acquisitions and Bankruptcies: Will the Collective Bargaining Agreement Survive, 56 J. Air L. & Com. 847 (1991) https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc/vol56/iss3/7 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Air Law and Commerce by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. AIRLINE MERGERS, ACQUISITIONS AND BANKRUPTCIES: WILL THE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT SURVIVE? JONNI WALLS I. INTRODUCTION AIRLINE DEREGULATION has produced a record number of mergers and bankruptcies in the airline in- dustry, turning the industry into a "national oligopoly."' Since deregulation, over 200 scheduled carriers have gone out of business, mainly because of mergers, acquisi- tions and bankruptcies. 2 As a result, the top eight carri- ers control over 90 percent of the market. Since 1978 more than 120 airlines have filed various types of bank- ruptcy proceedings.' The flurry of merger activity that began almost immediately upon enactment of deregula- tion 5 continues to be extremely vigorous. Between 1985 and 1987 over twenty-five mergers took place, and 1986 1 P. DEMPSEY, THE SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES OF DEREGULATION 81 (1989); Dempsey, Airline Deregulation and Laissez Faire Mythology: Economic Theory in Turbulence, 56J. AIR L. & CoM.
    [Show full text]
  • Corr Reviews Buckstein Leads '87 Performance on Legal Front Editor's Note: at the December Shareholders Meeting in New York, D
    _VOLUME 51 NUMBER 1 JANUARY 15, 1988 Corr Reviews Buckstein Leads '87 Performance On Legal Front editor's note: at the December shareholders meeting in New York, D. Joseph Corr, TWA president and chief operating officer, presented the following review of TWA. At last year's annual meeting, we reviewed the problems which faced TWA, and we discussed our plans to overcome these problems with the expectation of returning Mark A. Buckstein is senior vice president-external TWA to sustained profitability. This year, I am pleased to report that we have made affairs and general counsel for TWA. He holds a law tremendous progress, and are continuing to move ahead with added plans to improve degree from New York University, 1963, and is a the quality of our service as well as profitability of the company. special law professor at Hofstra University School At last year's meeting we anticipated the acquisition of Ozark Air Lines. Not only of Law. was this accomplished, but we are pleased to report that Ozark has been completely integrated into._TWA's operation, and we are now enjoying the bottom line benefits He joiried TWA on February 1, 1986. This interview of this acquisition. We are particularly proud of the expeditious fashion in which this was conducted in December at his 605 office. integration was accomplished, particularly in light of the problems experienced by other carriers when they have attempted to combine operations of two separate airlines, each with its own culture, union agreements and operating system. We promised that Mr. kahn and the new management of TWA was dedicated Employees with questions for Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Airline Service Abandonment and Consolidation - a Chapter in the Battle Ga Ainst Subsidization Ronald D
    Journal of Air Law and Commerce Volume 32 | Issue 4 Article 2 1966 Airline Service Abandonment and Consolidation - A Chapter in the Battle ga ainst Subsidization Ronald D. Dockser Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc Recommended Citation Ronald D. Dockser, Airline Service Abandonment and Consolidation - A Chapter in the Battle against Subsidization, 32 J. Air L. & Com. 496 (1966) https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc/vol32/iss4/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Air Law and Commerce by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. AIRLINE SERVICE ABANDONMENT AND CONSOLIDATION - A CHAPTER IN THE BATTLE AGAINST SUBSIDIZATIONt By RONALD D. DOCKSERtt CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION II. THE CASE FOR ELIMINATING SUBSIDY A. Subsidy Cost B. Misallocation Results Of Subsidy C. CAB Present And Future Subsidy Goals III. PROPOSALS FOR FURTHER SUBSIDY REDUCTION A. Federal TransportationBill B. The Locals' Proposal C. The Competitive Solution 1. Third Level Carriers D. Summary Of Proposals IV. TRUNKLINE ROUTE ABANDONMENT A. Passenger Convenience And Community Welfare B. Elimination Of Losses C. Equipment Modernization Program D. Effect On Competing Carriers E. Transfer Of Certificate Approach F. Evaluation Of Trunkline Abandonment V. LOCAL AIRLINE ROUTE ABANDONMENT A. Use-It-Or-Lose-It 1. Unusual and Compelling Circumstances a. Isolation and Poor Surface Transportation b. Growing Economic Potential of the Community c. Improved Equipment Will Soon Attract More Traffic d. Carrier Profits Despite Low Usage e.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 22: Number 1 (2004)
    Estimating Airline Employment: The Impact Of The 9-11 Terrorist Attacks David A. NewMyer, Robert W. Kaps, and Nathan L. Yukna Southern Illinois University Carbondale ABSTRACT In the calendar year prior to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, U. S. Airlines employed 732,049 people according to the Bureau of Transportation Statistics [BTS] of the U. S. Department of Transportation (Bureau of Transportation Statistics, U. S. Department of Transportation [BTS], 2001). Since the 9-11 attacks there have been numerous press reports concerning airline layoffs, especially at the "traditional," long-time airlines such as American, Delta, Northwest, United and US Airways. BTS figures also show that there has been a drop in U. S. Airline employment when comparing the figures at the end of the calendar year 2000 (732,049 employees) to the figures at the end of calendar year 2002 (642,797 employees) the first full year following the terrorist attacks (BTS, 2003). This change from 2000 to 2002 represents a total reduction of 89,252 employees. However, prior research by NewMyer, Kaps and Owens (2003) indicates that BTS figures do not necessarily represent the complete airline industry employment picture. Therefore, one key purpose of this research was to examine the scope of the post 9-11 attack airline employment change in light of all available sources. This first portion of the research compared a number of different data sources for airline employment data. A second purpose of the study will be to provide airline industry employment totals for both 2000 and 2002, if different from the BTS figures, and report those.
    [Show full text]