DOCSLIB.ORG

BRITISH AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT SHIPS from Suez to the Falklands and the Present Day

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BRITISH AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT SHIPS from Suez to the Falklands and the Present Day BRITISH AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT SHIPS From Suez to the Falklands and the present day EDWARD HAMPSHIRE ILLUSTRATED BY ADAM TOOBY NEW VANGUARD 277 BRITISH AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT SHIPS From Suez to the Falklands and the present day EDWARD HAMPSHIRE ILLUSTRATED BY ADAM TOOBY CONTENTS BRITISH NAVAL STRATEGY AND AMPHIBIOUS WARFARE 4 LANDING CRAFT AND HELICOPTERS 8 • Large landing craft • Medium landing craft • Small landing craft • Army landing craft • Helicopters LST 3 AND LSH(S) CLASSES 12 COMMANDO CARRIER CONVERSIONS: ALBION, 16 BULWARK AND HERMES FEARLESS CLASS 18 SIR LANCELOT CLASS, SIR GALAHAD (II), SIR LAMARAK 21 AND SIR CARADOC HMS OCEAN 25 BAY CLASS AND LOGISTICS SHIPS 28 ALBION CLASS 32 OPERATIONAL DEPLOYMENTS 33 • The Suez Crisis • The Cold War and ‘End of Empire’: 1957–82 • The Falklands campaign • The late Cold War and after: 1982–2018 DISPOSAL AND FATES 45 BIBLIOGRAPHY 47 INDEX 48 BRITISH AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT SHIPS From Suez to the Falklands and the present day BRITISH NAVAL STRATEGY AND AMPHIBIOUS WARFARE During World War II the United Kingdom developed an enormous amphibious capability, including hundreds of landing ships and thousands of landing craft, as well as an increasingly experienced and well-trained group of servicemen to operate these vessels. Starting with the Torch landings in North Africa in 1942 and culminating in the invasion of France in operations Neptune and Dragoon in June and August 1944, these forces, operating alongside the US, were instrumental in enabling the defeat of Germany in Europe. Allied amphibious operations in East Asia were also crucial in defeating the Japanese. With the end of the war, Britain’s amphibious capability was run down alongside much of the rest of the Royal Navy. Most of the amphibious ships had either been operated under Lend-Lease with the US, so were returned to the US between 1945 and 1946, or had been converted from merchant ships, so were converted back to civilian use. As it became clear that a long- term confrontation with the Soviet Union and its allies was developing in the 1940s, amphibious forces were not considered a key priority. Most resources and attention were given to anti-submarine forces to counter the significant Soviet submarine threat, and modern jet-capable aircraft HMS Reggio, an LST 3 modified as an assault landing ship with davits for six LCA landing craft, enters Malta harbour in the mid-1950s. (Imperial War Museum FL 5486) 4 carrier battle-groups able to gain control of the seas and strike at Soviet naval and land targets. The Korean War of 1950–53 demonstrated to the US government the continuing importance of amphibious forces in providing flanking attacks in land campaigns and, in the case of the landings at Inchon, even to change the course of a conflict. From this point onwards the United States began to invest heavily in both its Marine Corps and its specialized amphibious vessels. The Royal Navy was aware of these developments, but did not devote significant resources to renewing its much-shrunken World War II-era amphibious fleet. Port Said in Egypt immediately However, a low level of active operational capability began to be recreated following the ill-fated British– through the establishment of an Amphibious Warfare Squadron based in French assault to take control of the Suez Canal. The amphibious Malta in 1952. force, including LSTs, LCTs In the early 1950s, the Royal Navy’s amphibious capability largely and destroyers in gunfire remained focused on a number of British or Canadian-built Mark 3 Landing support roles, can be seen in Ships, Tank, or LST 3s, and smaller landing craft, all of which had been the distance. (Imperial War Museum MH 23509) built between 1944 and 1946. However, technology was beginning to change how amphibious assaults would be undertaken. Ship-based helicopters could now transport assault troops to their landing zones extremely rapidly, whilst the threat from new fast submarines meant that amphibious forces would need to be much quicker than the 10–13 knots that the existing LST 3s could manage. A Chiefs of Staff working party in 1954 recommended that amphibious warfare would have a role in raiding operations during wartime, with exercises being undertaken up to battalion level, and some training for brigade-level assaults. The Royal Marines would lead on this form of specialist warfare, as general training across the Army would no longer be required. These recommendations were accepted by the Chiefs and some incremental steps were taken to improve the amphibious capability. Four LST 3s were converted into assault landing ships, carrying a number of small landing craft on davits, and in July 1956 proposals were put forward for what would later be known as a ‘commando carrier’, based ‘East of Suez’, to enable helicopter amphibious assault. The 1956 Suez Crisis was a foreign policy disaster for the United Kingdom: it demonstrated the UK’s financial and political dependence on the United States, and resulted in a humiliating withdrawal from what had been a successful amphibious operation. However, the landings at Suez, which enabled a combined British, French and Israeli force to defeat Egyptian land and air forces, demonstrated the utility of helicopter amphibious assault and the need for new specialized assault ships to provide the speed and flexibility necessary to make successful landings. In addition, following the 1957 Defence Review, the Royal Navy under Lord Mountbatten’s leadership had 5 managed to forge a role for itself in an environment seemingly dominated by possible nuclear exchanges with the Soviet Union. The Royal Navy would provide intervention forces to support the ‘withdrawal from Empire’ east of the Suez Canal, and to fight or deter ‘cold’ and ‘warm’ wars as Soviet influence percolated into some former European colonies and the Soviet Navy began to venture beyond its traditional local waters. A crucial part of this intervention force would be an enhanced amphibious capability that took advantage of the latest developments in doctrinal thinking. This therefore led to the first great renewal of British amphibious forces after World War II: helicopter-capable ‘commando carriers’ were created from converting the two aircraft carriers Albion and Bulwark, and to provide the ‘East of Suez’ amphibious force, two new Fearless-class Landing Platforms, Dock (LPDs) and a range of new landing craft would be built. In addition Landing Ships, Logistics (LSLs) of the Sir Lancelot class were built to transport equipment worldwide and provide second-line support for amphibious landings. From the late 1950s through to the 1970s, Britain’s armed forces were involved in a series of ‘bush-fire’ wars as the United Kingdom withdrew from its empire, and the Royal Marines and Royal Navy’s amphibious forces were often heavily involved. Naval support was provided for long-running counter-insurgencies in Malaya, Borneo and Aden. Naval forces were also used to pre-empt and deter possible conflicts, such as the use of naval and amphibious forces in Lebanon in 1958 and in Kuwait in 1961. However, the increasing cost of retaining a large sophisticated military based and operating worldwide forced a series of defence economies on the Ministry of Defence. These included the cancellation of planned strike carriers, which would amongst other things have provided the air superiority necessary for the ‘East of Suez’ amphibious forces to undertake their intervention role. Further economies focused on equipment that could have provided credible worldwide capabilities, and pushed the government into accepting that the large-scale ‘East of Suez’ role was no longer affordable. In 1967 it was finally announced that the British military presence east of the Suez Canal would be withdrawn by 1975 (this was later speeded up to 1971). Major bases in Singapore and the Persian Gulf would be closed, and only a small residual force consisting of a handful of frigates and minesweepers would be needed after the withdrawal. Despite performing important duties during the confrontation with the Provisional IRA in Northern Ireland as part of Operation Motorman in 1972, the amphibious forces now seemed to lack a major military role. The existing capability was initially repurposed to provide support to the weak ‘flanks’ of NATO in the eastern Mediterranean and in Norway. It was the NATO Mediterranean theatre that provided the justification for converting another aircraft carrier, HMS Hermes, into a commando carrier (replacing Albion), but increasingly the focus turned to the Norwegian northern flank. The 1975 Defence Review further shrank the Royal Navy’s sphere of operations, stating that Bulwark would be withdrawn without replacement, a move that announced the end of permanent British naval forces in the Mediterranean. Fearless and Intrepid would operate through to the late 1980s but would not be replaced either. After this point, the Royal Marines would be transported to Norway by means that had not yet been determined – possibly by airlift on chartered civilian aircraft, with roll-on roll-off ferries transporting their military equipment. 6 The 1981 Defence Review initially threatened to speed up the withdrawal of the two LPDs to 1982 and 1984 respectively, even though no practical answer to the question of how the Royal Marines would get to Norway had yet been provided. Intensive lobbying by the United States against the planned cuts to the Navy as a whole, resulted in the then-Defence Secretary, Sir John Nott, offering to keep Fearless and Intrepid in service for some more years.1 This decision to retain the two ships was publicly announced a few weeks before the Argentinians invaded the Falkland Islands in the South Atlantic. The view from the cockpit The impact of the Falklands conflict, in which the Navy’s assault ships of a Sea King helicopter as were crucial in ensuring success, was to confirm the long-term survival of she lands on HMS Hermes in 1983 during NATO exercises the amphibious force.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Primary Casualty Receiving Facility, RFA ARGUS
    3 Operational Operational The UK maritime Role 3 medical treatment facility: the Primary Casualty Receiving Facility, RFA ARGUS Surg Capt J E Smith, Surg Cdr S R C Smith, Surg Capt G Hill Introduction that took over three years to complete. RFA ARGUS was The Royal Naval Medical Service has a maritime Role 3 named on 25 March 1987, and remains the maritime Role 3 medical treatment facility (MTF), in the form of the Primary MTF to this day. She has provided medical support to UK Casualty Receiving Facility (PCRF) on board Royal Fleet and Allied Forces during both Gulf Wars in her role as a Auxiliary (RFA) ARGUS, which in its largest confi guration primary casualty receiving ship. has 100 beds (4/4/10/20/70, indicating 4 resuscitation bays; 4 operating tables; 10 intensive care beds; 20 high- The ARGUS is not a designated hospital ship, as she carries dependency beds and 70 general beds). The purpose of this weapons systems and has other military roles. As a result article is to describe this facility, and its recent activities, in she does not operate under the protection of the Geneva particular with reference to the future potential capabilities Convention of 1949. This allows her to be placed much that are currently under review. closer to the battlespace, allowing for more rapid transfer of patients to defi nitive care. During her operational medical The ship deployment during the Iraq confl ict in 2003, she went to the The ARGUS is a 28,000 tonne Royal Fleet Auxiliary (RFA) Northern Arabian Gulf as a grey vessel (complete with her vessel, whose primary role is as a PCRF.
    [Show full text]
  • Telling the Story of the Royal Navy and Its People in the 20Th & 21St
    NATIONAL Telling the story of the Royal Navy and its people MUSEUM in the 20th & 21st Centuries OF THE ROYAL NAVY Storehouse 10: New Galleries Project: Exhibition Design Report JULY 2011 NATIONAL MUSEUM OF THE ROYAL NAVY Telling the story of the Royal Navy and its people in the 20th & 21st Centuries Storehouse 10: New Galleries Project: Exhibition Design Report 2 EXHIBITION DESIGN REPORT Contents Contents 1.0 Executive Summary 2.0 Introduction 2.1 Vision, Goal and Mission 2.2 Strategic Context 2.3 Exhibition Objectives 3.0 Design Brief 3.1 Interpretation Strategy 3.2 Target Audiences 3.3 Learning & Participation 3.4 Exhibition Themes 3.5 Special Exhibition Gallery 3.6 Content Detail 4.0 Design Proposals 4.1 Gallery Plan 4.2 Gallery Plan: Visitor Circulation 4.3 Gallery Plan: Media Distribution 4.4 Isometric View 4.5 Finishes 5.0 The Visitor Experience 5.1 Visuals of the Gallery 5.2 Accessibility 6.0 Consultation & Participation EXHIBITION DESIGN REPORT 3 Ratings from HMS Sphinx. In the back row, second left, is Able Seaman Joseph Chidwick who first spotted 6 Africans floating on an upturned tree, after they had escaped from a slave trader on the coast. The Navy’s impact has been felt around the world, in peace as well as war. Here, the ship’s Carpenter on HMS Sphinx sets an enslaved African free following his escape from a slave trader in The slave trader following his capture by a party of Royal Marines and seamen. the Persian Gulf, 1907. 4 EXHIBITION DESIGN REPORT 1.0 Executive Summary 1.0 Executive Summary Enabling people to learn, enjoy and engage with the story of the Royal Navy and understand its impact in making the modern world.
    [Show full text]
  • The British Commonwealth and Allied Naval Forces' Operation with the Anti
    THE BRITISH COMMONWEALTH AND ALLIED NAVAL FORCES’ OPERATION WITH THE ANTI-COMMUNIST GUERRILLAS IN THE KOREAN WAR: WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE OPERATION ON THE WEST COAST By INSEUNG KIM A dissertation submitted to The University of Birmingham For the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of History and Cultures College of Arts and Law The University of Birmingham May 2018 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT This thesis examines the British Commonwealth and Allied Naval forces operation on the west coast during the final two and a half years of the Korean War, particularly focused on their co- operation with the anti-Communist guerrillas. The purpose of this study is to present a more realistic picture of the United Nations (UN) naval forces operation in the west, which has been largely neglected, by analysing their activities in relation to the large number of irregular forces. This thesis shows that, even though it was often difficult and frustrating, working with the irregular groups was both strategically and operationally essential to the conduct of the war, and this naval-guerrilla relationship was of major importance during the latter part of the naval campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • Whistl Allsort Customer Guide/February 2021 V1.1
    AllSort Customer Guide v1.1 Table of Contents 1.0 AllSort Overview ......................................................................................................................................3 1.1 Who it suits .....................................................................................................................................................3 1.2 Minimum volumes ...........................................................................................................................................3 1.3 Included services † ..........................................................................................................................................3 1.4 Collections ......................................................................................................................................................3 1.5 Presentation ...................................................................................................................................................4 1.6 AllSort service summary by format .................................................................................................................4 1.7 Force Majeure Events.....................................................................................................................................4 2.0 AllSort National (UK) Items .................................................................................................................5 2.1 Description † ...................................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Master Narrative Ours Is the Epic Story of the Royal Navy, Its Impact on Britain and the World from Its Origins in 625 A.D
    NMRN Master Narrative Ours is the epic story of the Royal Navy, its impact on Britain and the world from its origins in 625 A.D. to the present day. We will tell this emotionally-coloured and nuanced story, one of triumph and achievement as well as failure and muddle, through four key themes:- People. We tell the story of the Royal Navy’s people. We examine the qualities that distinguish people serving at sea: courage, loyalty and sacrifice but also incidents of ignorance, cruelty and cowardice. We trace the changes from the amateur ‘soldiers at sea’, through the professionalization of officers and then ships’ companies, onto the ‘citizen sailors’ who fought the World Wars and finally to today’s small, elite force of men and women. We highlight the change as people are rewarded in war with personal profit and prize money but then dispensed with in peace, to the different kind of recognition given to salaried public servants. Increasingly the people’s story becomes one of highly trained specialists, often serving in branches with strong corporate identities: the Royal Marines, the Submarine Service and the Fleet Air Arm. We will examine these identities and the Royal Navy’s unique camaraderie, characterised by simultaneous loyalties to ship, trade, branch, service and comrades. Purpose. We tell the story of the Royal Navy’s roles in the past, and explain its purpose today. Using examples of what the service did and continues to do, we show how for centuries it was the pre-eminent agent of first the British Crown and then of state policy throughout the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Shield's Magnum Series Covers Modernize Ground Combat Vehicle
    Fall 2012 Shield’s Magnum Series Covers Modernize Ground Combat Vehicle Asset Protection The recent introduction of the Magnum Series line of Envelop® Protective Covers has received rave reviews from Soldiers, Sailors, and Marines in the armed forces. The light-weight, low-friction, and user friendly technology has revolutionized asset protection procedures. Magnum Series covers are the most effective protective covers available in the world. To effectively stop corrosion, the largest preventable cost to DOD today, a cover must be waterproof, proficiently breathable, and incorporate Vapor Corrosion Inhibitors (VCI's). Envelop® Protective Covers are the only technology in the world that do all three. The new Magnum Series incorporates the same technology in a lightweight, easy to install, package. Envelop® Magnum Series is available for a variety of ground combat vehicles. Designs have been created for the following platforms: M1 Series Abrams, M109 Paladin, M2A2 Bradley, ASV, Maxxpro RG-33, SCTV, HIMARS, MLRS, Cougar Cat I, Cougar Cat II, LAV, HEMTT Fueler, and M88A2. Designs are in progress for the M2A3 Bradley and Stryker. From Top to Bottom: M109 A6 Paladin 2-Piece Set-123063, M2A2 Bradley-123125, M1 Series Abrams 2-Piece Set– 123125 Royal Navy Looks to Envelop® For Ship Board Protection vessels. Beginning in the fall of 2011, new board US Navy vessels, a decision was made covers have been designed and evaluations to immediately develop covers for the have begun at the Royal Navy Dockyard in Amphibious Assault Ship HMS OCEAN Devonport, UK. (L12). The covers will protect critical small For the short term evaluation the boat handling and RAS equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane Irma
    Information Bulletin Americas: Hurricane Irma Information Bulletin no. 4 Date of issue: 11 September 2017 Point of contact: Felipe Del Cid, Disaster and Crisis Department Period covered by this bulletin: 9– Continental Operations Coordinator, email: [email protected] 11 September 2017 Red Cross Movement actors currently involved in the operation: The International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC), American Red Cross, Antigua and Barbuda Red Cross, British Red Cross overseas branches, Bahamas Red Cross Society, Canadian Red Cross Society, Cuban Red Cross, Dominican Red Cross Society, French Red Cross-PIRAC (Regional Intervention Platform for the Americas and the Caribbean), Haiti Red Cross Society, Italian Red Cross, Netherlands Red Cross overseas branches, Norwegian Red Cross, Saint Kitts and Nevis Red Cross Society, Spanish Red Cross, Swiss Red Cross, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). N° of other partner organizations involved in the operation: Caribbean Disaster Emergency Management Agency (CDEMA), United Nations system agencies (UNICEF, WFP, FAO, OCHA, IOM), DG-ECHO, Pan American Health Organization [PAHO], government of affected countries, USAID/OFDA, DFID, among others. This bulletin is being issued for information only; it reflects the current situation and details available at this time. Information bulletins no.1, 2 and 3 are available here. The Situation On 11 September, the centre of Tropical Storm Irma was located near latitude 30.3 North, longitude 83.1 West at 11:00 EDT. The centre of Irma is in southwestern Georgia at present. On the forecast track, it will move into eastern Alabama Tuesday morning. After its passage through Cuba on 9 September, Irma severely impacted northern and central Cuba, causing coastal and river flooding.
    [Show full text]
  • Industry Recognises A&P As Best in Practice During
    NEWSLETTER | ISSUE 6 SUMMER 2020 INDUSTRY RECOGNISES A&P AS BEST IN PRACTICE DURING COVID-19 A&P Defence has been praised for It is A&P Group’s strict programme of the risk of the virus entering our facilities its role in preparing RFA Argus Covid-19 measures that has made it and minimise disruption to vessels as and RFA Lyme Bay for urgent possible to continue essential ship repair they arrive at our sites. Customers can and maintenance work for the MoD, be assured that they face minimum deployment, as part of the UK Royal Fleet Auxiliary and Seaborne disruption when visiting our facilities as Government’s Covid-19 asset community during the pandemic. we’ve found effective ways to safeguard pandemic response. Throughout this period A&P Group our workforce and customers whilst has provided critical support to continuing to deliver essential projects.” Based at A&P Falmouth, A&P Defence RFA Mounts Bay. supported RFA Argus during an extended A&P’s Covid-19 Response Assisted Maintenance Period (AMP) A&P Tyne has also installed cable repair • Full contingency plans in place equipment to Prysmian’s North Sea Giant, earlier this year. RFA Lyme Bay was due across all three facilities. for scheduled maintenance at A&P which was essential to the safe and Falmouth in March, however the vessel continuous power supply to the • Enhanced cleaning & hygiene activities. was diverted to a Ministry of Defence National Grid. • Supply of appropriate PPE. facility to fully store for operations. A&P David McGinley, Chief Executive Officer • Enforced social distancing measures.
    [Show full text]
  • Sunset for the Royal Marines? the Royal Marines and UK Amphibious Capability
    House of Commons Defence Committee Sunset for the Royal Marines? The Royal Marines and UK amphibious capability Third Report of Session 2017–19 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 30 January 2018 HC 622 Published on 4 February 2018 by authority of the House of Commons The Defence Committee The Defence Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Ministry of Defence and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon Dr Julian Lewis MP (Conservative, New Forest East) (Chair) Leo Docherty MP (Conservative, Aldershot) Martin Docherty-Hughes MP (Scottish National Party, West Dunbartonshire) Rt Hon Mark Francois MP (Conservative, Rayleigh and Wickford) Graham P Jones MP (Labour, Hyndburn) Johnny Mercer MP (Conservative, Plymouth, Moor View) Mrs Madeleine Moon MP (Labour, Bridgend) Gavin Robinson MP (Democratic Unionist Party, Belfast East) Ruth Smeeth MP (Labour, Stoke-on-Trent North) Rt Hon John Spellar MP (Labour, Warley) Phil Wilson MP (Labour, Sedgefield) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications Committee reports are published on the Committee’s website at www.parliament.uk/defcom and in print by Order of the House. Evidence relating to this report is published on the inquiry page of the Committee’s website. Committee staff Mark Etherton (Clerk), Dr Adam Evans (Second Clerk), Martin Chong, David Nicholas, Eleanor Scarnell, and Ian Thomson (Committee Specialists), Sarah Williams (Senior Committee Assistant), and Carolyn Bowes and Arvind Gunnoo (Committee Assistants).
    [Show full text]
  • Gunline Winter07.Qxd
    Gunline - The First Point of Contact Published by the Royal Fleet Auxiliary Service December 2007 www.rfa.mod.uk Roving the South Atlantic Building Belize his year a lot of focus has been drawn on the South Atlantic 25 years ago, but of course the RFA has maintained a presence there almost continuously ever since. TToday the RFA is still working hard patrolling the Falklands and other Islands to stay As Wave Ruler returns to Devonport after her 18 in touch with the remote local communities and maintain a UK presence around the Islands. month deployment, we look back at what has been one As this year’s commemorations closed, it was time to get back to work. Captain Paul Minter of the most successful deployments in APT(N) history. provides an insight into life there in 2007….. See pages 14 & 15 See pages 2 & 3 Inside this Issue... All at sea Jim Davidson on board HRH visits the Bays RFA Association Airwolf flys from Page 8 Mounts Bay Page 6 Remembering in 2007 Mounts Bay Page 5 Page 13 Page 15 2 - Gunline From the Commodore… The Challenges of Trust and Communication After 18 Months - 21 Ports For those of you who missed my last article I want to highlight a couple of paragraphs and use these to develop a theme for this article. For those of you who gained the immense enjoyment of reading the last article, I make no apology for reminding you of these important words: 15 Homes Rebuilt.... WAVE The Navy Board endorsed: “the immediate development and implementation of the evolved RFA which will provide a more integrated and effective organisation and he Royal Fleet Auxiliary ship Wave Ruler returns to the UK after the most reassure the long term employment of the RFA.” successful deployment on counter drugs operations in recent history.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Royal Marines 1837-1914 HE Blumberg
    History of the Royal Marines 1837-1914 HE Blumberg (Minor editing by Alastair Donald) In preparing this Record I have consulted, wherever possible, the original reports, Battalion War and other Diaries, accounts in Globe and Laurel, etc. The War Office Official Accounts, where extant, the London Gazettes, and Orders in Council have been taken as the basis of events recounted, and I have made free use of the standard histories, eg History of the British Army (Fortescue), History of the Navy (Laird Clowes), Britain's Sea Soldiers (Field), etc. Also the Lives of Admirals and Generals bearing on the campaigns. The authorities consulted have been quoted for each campaign, in order that those desirous of making a fuller study can do so. I have made no pretence of writing a history or making comments, but I have tried to place on record all facts which can show the development of the Corps through the Nineteenth and early part of the Twentieth Centuries. H E BLUMBERG Devonport January, 1934 1 P A R T I 1837 – 1839 The Long Peace On 20 June, 1837, Her Majesty Queen Victoria ascended the Throne and commenced the long reign which was to bring such glory and honour to England, but the year found the fortunes of the Corps at a very low ebb. The numbers voted were 9007, but the RM Artillery had officially ceased to exist - a School of Laboratory and nominally two companies quartered at Fort Cumberland as part of the Portsmouth Division only being maintained. The Portsmouth Division were still in the old inadequate Clarence Barracks in the High Street; Plymouth and Chatham were in their present barracks, which had not then been enlarged to their present size, and Woolwich were in the western part of the Royal Artillery Barracks.
    [Show full text]
  • Genitourinary Medicine and Surgery in Nelson's Navy
    413 HISTORY OF MEDICINE Postgrad Med J: first published as 10.1136/pgmj.2004.022335 on 5 July 2005. Downloaded from Genitourinary medicine and surgery in Nelson’s navy J C Goddard ............................................................................................................................... Postgrad Med J 2005;81:413–418. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2004.022335 Surgeons of the Royal Navy during the Napoleonic and mix, and management of genitourinary disease during this period. A general overview is given of revolutionary wars, between 1793 and 1815, were solely the life and work of the Royal Naval surgeons at responsible for all health care of the officers, men, and the end of the 18th century. boys of their ships. This paper examines the genitourinary medicine and surgery encountered by the naval surgeons THE 18TH CENTURY NAVAL MEDICAL SERVICE at the time of Nelson. Primary sources are examined to The naval surgeons of the Nelsonian period have explore the presentation, case mix, and management of an undeserved reputation as rough ‘‘sawbones’’ genitourinary disease during this period. A general only able to hack off limbs and pull teeth. Indeed, at the time, Sir William Dillon said of his overview is given of the life and work of the Royal Naval surgeon, Thomas Grey, ‘‘Although an excellent surgeons at the end of the 18th century. The documents that scholar, being nearsighted with a defect in one of were examined contained 39 surgeon’s journals, these his eyes—we did not place much reliance on his ability at amputation.’’ Contemporary accounts were written by 26 surgeons on 13 different ships. The such as this one do little for the surgeons’ journals contained 446 presentations to the sick list of men reputation.
    [Show full text]