DOCSLIB.ORG

Review Of" Soap, Science, and Flat-Screen Tvs: a History of Liquid

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Review Of Swarthmore College Works Physics & Astronomy Faculty Works Physics & Astronomy 8-1-2011 Review Of "Soap, Science, And Flat-Screen Tvs: A History Of Liquid Crystals" By D. Dunmur And T. Sluckin And "Structure And Properties Of Liquid Crystals" By L. M. Blinov Peter J. Collings Swarthmore College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-physics Part of the Physics Commons Let us know how access to these works benefits ouy Recommended Citation Peter J. Collings. (2011). "Review Of "Soap, Science, And Flat-Screen Tvs: A History Of Liquid Crystals" By D. Dunmur And T. Sluckin And "Structure And Properties Of Liquid Crystals" By L. M. Blinov". Physics Today. Volume 64, Issue 8. 49-50. DOI: 10.1063/PT.3.1219 https://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-physics/266 This work is brought to you for free by Swarthmore College Libraries' Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Physics & Astronomy Faculty Works by an authorized administrator of Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Physics Today Soap, Science, and Flat-Screen TVs: A History of Liquid Crystals; Structure and Properties of Liquid Crystals Peter Collings Citation: Physics Today 64(8), 49 (2011); doi: 10.1063/PT.3.1219 View online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/PT.3.1219 View Table of Contents: http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/magazine/physicstoday/64/8?ver=pdfcov Published by the AIP Publishing Reuse of AIP Publishing content is subject to the terms at: https://publishing.aip.org/authors/rights-and-permissions. Download to IP: 130.58.65.20 On: Fri, 01 Jul 2016 18:07:20 books Illuminating discussions on an exotic material from near the middle of the minor criticism and in no way Soap, Science, and 19th century up to the present. decreases my admiration for Flat-Screen TVs As someone who has been what the authors have accom- engaged in liquid-crystal re - plished. This is a truly stimu- A History of Liquid Crystals search for several decades, I lating look at the history and David Dunmur and Tim Sluckin found that the historical nar - science of a little-understood Oxford University Press, New York, rative in Soap, Science, and phase of matter and a material 2011. $53.95 (345 pp.). Flat-Screen TVs filled in my that affects our lives every day. ISBN 978-0-19-954940-5 knowledge of many of the For experts looking for a characters. It also created in more rigorous lesson on liquid- my mind portraits of those crystal science, a textbook is the Structure and researchers as people. I would have obvious place to turn. And because few guessed that they possessed both amaz- texts exist for a course on the subject, Properties of ing talents and serious foibles, but those Structure and Properties of Liquid Crystals extremes don’t capture the full land- is a welcome addition. Its author, Lev Liquid Crystals scape of their lives, which the authors Blinov, has long been a leading contrib- Lev M. Blinov reveal with sensitivity and wit. All the utor to the field, and his taking the time Springer Science and Business facts given in the book are to write a high-quality text is a Media, Heidelberg, Germany, 2011. consistent with what I have wonderful gesture. By design, $129.00 (439 pp.). learned over the years. Thus the book fills a gap between ISBN 978-90-481-8828-4 the authors must be congratu- other available textbooks such Reviewed by Peter Collings lated for the accuracy and as Introduction to Liquid Crys- Chemist David Dunmur and physicist nuanced perspective that tals: Chemistry and Physics Tim Sluckin have made important con- characterizes the book. (Taylor & Francis, 1997) by tributions to the field of liquid-crystal What will nonexperts Michael Hird and me, The research and are respected by all of us think? For readers who enjoy Physics of Liquid Crystals (2nd who toil in it. Soap, Science, and Flat- learning some new science, edition, Oxford University Screen TVs: A History of Liquid Crystals is this book will be a wonderful Press, 1993) by Pierre-Gilles yet another contribution, but of a very read. They will be able to fol- de Gennes and Jacques Prost, different sort—namely, “somewhere low both the science and the personali- and Liquid Crystals: Fundamentals (World between history of science and popular ties; as a result, they will understand Scientific, 2002) by Shri Singh. The first science,” to use the authors’ own words. the convoluted scientific path that led to book contains only selected topics but Their desire is to “communicate the our understanding of liquid crystals develops the necessary background excitement of liquid crystals to a wider and come to appreciate that science, chemistry and physics. The other two audience.” To do that, they explain the after all, is done by people. I find it more books cover many more topics at a important concepts and techniques nec- difficult to gauge the reaction of readers higher mathematical and scientific level, essary to understand the historical nar- who might be interested in the book’s but contain little background informa- rative, frequently placing them in boxes characters but not in the scientific ques- tion on general chemistry and physics. so as not to disrupt the storyline. But tions with which those characters grap- Structure and Properties of Liquid Crys- there’s no mistaking that the book pled. Without an appreciation of those tals discusses the theoretical concepts focuses on bringing to life the people questions, I think a good deal of what necessary to understand the liquid- who did the experiments and formed makes the characters interesting is lost. crystal phase from the perspective of an the theories, by including a good deal Such is the peril of trying to teach sci- experimentalist. All the necessary the- about their personalities, interactions, ence in a history book. ory is there for a wide range of topics in intellectual proclivities, and historical The authors note that their explana- the physics of liquid crystals. But when- settings. The result is a well-written, tions do not include equations and ever possible, Blinov makes connec- accurate, and totally engaging look at mathematical rigor; as a result they tions to experimental techniques and the history and science of liquid crystals expect to be criticized by experts. I results, and he includes some develop- found the explanations both clear and ment of the general physical ideas that Peter Collings, whose research on liquid correct for the most part, so their expec- form the foundation of our knowledge crystals spans nearly 40 years, is the tation may not be realized. At one point, in this field. Line drawings are used Morris L. Clothier Professor of Physics at however, there is confusion about throughout the text to help with the Swarthmore College in Swarthmore, whether it is the direction of propaga- explanations, as are simple analogies Pennsyl vania. He is the author or coauthor tion or the direction of polarization that and references to familiar concepts. The of two books on liquid crystals and has determines the index of refraction in an book is certainly suitable for advanced edited a handbook on liquid-crystal science. anisotropic material. Still, that is a undergraduates and graduate students Reuse of AIPwww.physicstoday.org Publishing content is subject to the terms at: https://publishing.aip.org/authors/rights-and-permissions. August Download 2011 to IP: Physics 130.58.65.20 Today On:49 Fri, 01 Jul 2016 18:07:20 taking a course on liquid crystals. conducting postdoctoral re - Other gems in the book are Some minor shortcomings appear in search at the Institute for the wonderful discussions by the text. One concerns the presence of Advanced Study in Princeton, DeWitt and Wheeler about numerous grammatical mistakes and New Jersey. They married in Hugh Everett III and his “rel- misspellings. Those never rise to the 1951 and moved to the Univer- ative state” or “many-worlds” level of causing confusion, but they are sity of North Carolina at interpretation of quantum noticeable. The second concerns a slight Chapel Hill in 1956; there, mechanics (pages 91–100); an unevenness in how much background encouraged by Freeman important biographical mem- physics is supplied for the myriad top- Dyson and John Wheeler, oir (pages 123–131) by Steven ics covered in the book. In most cases, DeWitt would become the Weinberg that he prepared in Blinov nicely relates his topic to basic founding director of the Insti- 2008 for the National Acad- physics before developing the ideas tute of Field Physics. (It was at emy of Sciences; and an excel- important to liquid crystals. But some- the institute that Peter Higgs, then a lent introductory letter from DeWitt to times he makes a connection to a fairly postdoc, wrote his famous 1964 paper his grandson, Ben, partly to explain sophisticated idea; in such cases readers on the Higgs boson and its role in why he chose physics (pages 1–4). unfamiliar with the concept will wish spontaneous symmetry breaking.) The DeWitt-Morette took great care in the author had offered a more funda- DeWitts moved to the University of producing a well-documented and mental discussion. But the weaknesses Texas at Austin in 1971 where he well-rounded memoir covering the are fairly inconsequential; Structure and remained until his passing in 2004. many aspects of her husband’s out- Properties of Liquid Crystals is a truly use- DeWitt was the first to find the per- standing character and achievements. ful addition to the pedagogical litera- turbation rules to all orders for ghost The only significant lacuna I noticed is ture on liquid crystals.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Pursuit of Quantum Gravity
    The Pursuit of Quantum Gravity Cécile DeWitt-Morette The Pursuit of Quantum Gravity Memoirs of Bryce DeWitt from 1946 to 2004 123 Cécile DeWitt-Morette Department of Physics Center for Relativity University of Texas at Austin Austin Texas USA [email protected] ISBN 978-3-642-14269-7 e-ISBN 978-3-642-14270-3 DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-14270-3 Springer Heidelberg Dordrecht London New York Library of Congress Control Number: 2011921724 c Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is con- cerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilm or in any other way, and storage in data banks. Duplication of this publica- tion or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the German Copyright Law of September 9, 1965, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Violations are liable to prosecution under the German Copyright Law. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protec- tive laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. Cover design:WMXDesignGmbH,Heidelberg Printed on acid-free paper Springer is part of Springer Science+Business Media (www.springer.com) Dedicated to our daughters, Nicolette, Jan, Christiane, Abigail Preface This book is written for the curious reader. I hope it will also be a good read for the professional physicist.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Report 2010-12
    RESEARCH REPORt 2010—2012 MAX-PLANCK-INSTITUT FÜR WISSENSCHAFTSGESCHICHTE Max Planck Institute for the History of Science Cover: Aurora borealis paintings by William Crowder, National Geographic (1947). The International Geophysical Year (1957–8) transformed research on the aurora, one of nature’s most elusive and intensely beautiful phenomena. Aurorae became the center of interest for the big science of powerful rockets, complex satellites and large group efforts to understand the magnetic and charged particle environment of the earth. The auroral visoplot displayed here provided guidance for recording observations in a standardized form, translating the sublime aesthetics of pictorial depictions of aurorae into the mechanical aesthetics of numbers and symbols. Most of the portait photographs were taken by Skúli Sigurdsson RESEARCH REPORT 2010—2012 MAX-PLANCK-INSTITUT FÜR WISSENSCHAFTSGESCHICHTE Max Planck Institute for the History of Science Introduction The Max Planck Institute for the History of Science (MPIWG) is made up of three Departments, each administered by a Director, and several Independent Research Groups, each led for five years by an outstanding junior scholar. Since its foundation in 1994 the MPIWG has investigated fundamental questions of the history of knowl- edge from the Neolithic to the present. The focus has been on the history of the natu- ral sciences, but recent projects have also integrated the history of technology and the history of the human sciences into a more panoramic view of the history of knowl- edge. Of central interest is the emergence of basic categories of scientific thinking and practice as well as their transformation over time: examples include experiment, ob- servation, normalcy, space, evidence, biodiversity or force.
    [Show full text]
  • Nobel Lectures™ 2001-2005
    World Scientific Connecting Great Minds 逾10 0 种 诺贝尔奖得主著作 及 诺贝尔奖相关图书 我们非常荣幸得以出版超过100种诺贝尔奖得主著作 以及诺贝尔奖相关图书。 我们自1980年代开始与诺贝尔奖得主合作出版高品质 畅销书。一些得主担任我们的编辑顾问、丛书编辑， 并于我们期刊发表综述文章与学术论文。 世界科技与帝国理工学院出版社还邀得其中多位作了公 开演讲。 Philip W Anderson Sir Derek H R Barton Aage Niels Bohr Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar Murray Gell-Mann Georges Charpak Nicolaas Bloembergen Baruch S Blumberg Hans A Bethe Aaron J Ciechanover Claude Steven Chu Cohen-Tannoudji Leon N Cooper Pierre-Gilles de Gennes Niels K Jerne Richard Feynman Kenichi Fukui Lawrence R Klein Herbert Kroemer Vitaly L Ginzburg David Gross H Gobind Khorana Rita Levi-Montalcini Harry M Markowitz Karl Alex Müller Sir Nevill F Mott Ben Roy Mottelson 诺贝尔奖相关图书 THE PERIODIC TABLE AND A MISSED NOBEL PRIZES THAT CHANGED MEDICINE NOBEL PRIZE edited by Gilbert Thompson (Imperial College London) by Ulf Lagerkvist & edited by Erling Norrby (The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences) This book brings together in one volume fifteen Nobel Prize- winning discoveries that have had the greatest impact upon medical science and the practice of medicine during the 20th “This is a fascinating account of how century and up to the present time. Its overall aim is to groundbreaking scientists think and enlighten, entertain and stimulate. work. This is the insider’s view of the process and demands made on the Contents: The Discovery of Insulin (Robert Tattersall) • The experts of the Nobel Foundation who Discovery of the Cure for Pernicious Anaemia, Vitamin B12 assess the originality and significance (A Victor Hoffbrand) • The Discovery of
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Recollections of the Early Days Before and After the Birth of Supergravity
    Personal recollections of the early days before and after the birth of Supergravity Peter van Nieuwenhuizen I March 29, 1976: Dan Freedman, Sergio Ferrara and I submit first paper on Supergravity to Physical Review D. I April 28: Stanley Deser and Bruno Zumino: elegant reformulation that stresses the role of torsion. I June 2, 2016 at 1:30pm: 5500 papers with Supergravity in the title have appeared, and 15000 dealing with supergravity. I Supergravity has I led to the AdS/CFT miracle, and I made breakthroughs in longstanding problems in mathematics. I Final role of supergravity? (is it a solution in search of a problem?) I 336 papers in supergravity with 126 collaborators I Now: many directions I can only observe in awe from the sidelines I will therefore tell you my early recollections and some anecdotes. I will end with a new research program that I am enthusiastic about. In 1972 I was a Joliot Curie fellow at Orsay (now the Ecole Normale) in Paris. Another postdoc (Andrew Rothery from England) showed me a little book on GR by Lawden.1 I was hooked. That year Deser gave lectures at Orsay on GR, and I went with him to Brandeis. In 1973, 't Hooft and Veltman applied their new covariant quantization methods and dimensional regularization to pure gravity, using the 't Hooft lemma (Gilkey) for 1-loop divergences and the background field formalism of Bryce DeWitt. They found that at one loop, pure gravity was finite: 1 2 2 ∆L ≈ αRµν + βR = 0 on-shell. But what about matter couplings? 1\An Introduction to Tensor Calculus and Relativity".
    [Show full text]
  • Adobe Acrobat PDF Document
    BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH of HUGH EVERETT, III. Eugene Shikhovtsev ul. Dzerjinskogo 11-16, Kostroma, 156005, Russia [email protected] ©2003 Eugene B. Shikhovtsev and Kenneth W. Ford. All rights reserved. Sources used for this biographical sketch include papers of Hugh Everett, III stored in the Niels Bohr Library of the American Institute of Physics; Graduate Alumni Files in Seeley G. Mudd Manuscript Library, Princeton University; personal correspondence of the author; and information found on the Internet. The author is deeply indebted to Kenneth Ford for great assistance in polishing (often rewriting!) the English and for valuable editorial remarks and additions. If you want to get an interesting perspective do not think of Hugh as a traditional 20th century physicist but more of a Renaissance man with interests and skills in many different areas. He was smart and lots of things interested him and he brought the same general conceptual methodology to solve them. The subject matter was not so important as the solution ideas. Donald Reisler [1] Someone once noted that Hugh Everett should have been declared a “national resource,” and given all the time and resources he needed to develop new theories. Joseph George Caldwell [1a] This material may be freely used for personal or educational purposes provided acknowledgement is given to Eugene B. Shikhovtsev, author ([email protected]), and Kenneth W. Ford, editor ([email protected]). To request permission for other uses, contact the author or editor. CONTENTS 1 Family and Childhood Einstein letter (1943) Catholic University of America in Washington (1950-1953). Chemical engineering. Princeton University (1953-1956).
    [Show full text]
  • Fermi Lecture 6 Weak Force Carriers W, Z and Origin of Mass: Higgs Particle
    Frontiers in Physics and Astrophysics Fermi Lecture 6 Weak Force carriers W, Z and Origin of Mass: Higgs Particle Barry C Barish 5-December-2019 Fermi Lecture 6 1 Enrico Fermi Fermi Lecture 6 2 Enrico Fermi Lectures 2019-2020 Frontiers of Physics and Astrophysics • Explore frontiers of Physics and Astrophysics from an Experimental Viewpoint • Some History and Background for Each Frontier • Emphasis on Large Facilities and Major Recent Discoveries • Discuss Future Directions and Initiatives ---------------------------------------------------------------------- • Thursdays 4-6 pm • Oct 10,17,24,one week break, Nov 7 • Nov 28, Dec 5,12,19 Jan 9,16,23 • Feb 27, March 5,12,19 Fermi Lecture 6 3 Frontiers Fermi Lectures 2019-2020 - Barry C Barish • Course Title: Large Scale Facilities and the Frontiers of Physics • The Course will consist of 15 Lectures, which will be held from 16:00 to 18:00 in aula Amaldi, Marconi building, according to the following schedule: • 10 October 2019 - Introduction to Physics of the Universe 17 October 2019 - Elementary Particles 24 October 2019 - Quarks 7 November 2019 – Particle Accelerators 28 November 2019 – Big Discoveries and the Standard Model 5 December 2019 – Weak Force Carriers – Z, W: and Higgs Mechanism 12 December 2019 – Higgs Discovery; Supersymmetry? Intro to Neutrinos 19 December 2019 – Neutrinos 9 January 2020 – Neutrino Oscillations and Future Perspectives (2) 16 January 2020 - Gravitational Waves (1) 23 January 2020 - Gravitational Waves (2) 27 February 2020 – Gravitational Waves – Future Perspectives 5 March 2020 – Dark Matter 12 March 2020 – Particle Astrophysics, Experimental Cosmology 19 March 2020 - The Future • All Lectures and the supporting teaching materials will be published by the Physics Department.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Issues in Quantum Cosmology
    Conceptual Issues in Quantum Cosmology Claus Kiefer Institut fur¨ Theoretische Physik Universitat¨ zu Koln¨ ½ Contents Why quantum cosmology? Boundary conditions Decoherence in quantum cosmology Direction of time Why Quantum Cosmology? Gell-Mann and Hartle 1990: Quantum mechanics is best and most fundamentally understood in the framework of quantum cosmology. I Quantum theory is universally valid: Application to the Universe as a whole as the only closed quantum system in the strict sense I Need quantum theory of gravity, since gravity dominates on large scales Georges Lemaˆıtre 1931: If the world has begun with a single quantum, the notions of space and time would altogether fail to have any meaning at the beginning . If this suggestion is correct, the beginning of the world happened a little before the beginning of space and time. Main approaches to quantum gravity No question about quantum gravity is more difficult than the question, “What is the question?” (John Wheeler 1984) I Quantum general relativity I Covariant approaches (perturbation theory, path integrals including spin foams, asymptotic safety, . ) I Canonical approaches (geometrodynamics, connection dynamics, loop dynamics, . ) I String theory I Fundamental discrete approaches (quantum topology, causal sets, group field theory, . ); have partially grown out of the other approaches See e.g. C. Kiefer, Quantum Gravity, 3rd edition, Oxford 2012. Quantum geometrodynamics (a) John Archibald Wheeler (b) Bryce DeWitt Application of Schrodinger’s¨ procedure to general relativity leads
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights of Modern Physics and Astrophysics
    Highlights of Modern Physics and Astrophysics How to find the “Top Ten” in Physics & Astrophysics? - List of Nobel Laureates in Physics - Other prizes? Templeton prize, … - Top Citation Rankings of Publication Search Engines - Science News … - ... Nobel Laureates in Physics Year Names Achievement 2020 Sir Roger Penrose "for the discovery that black hole formation is a robust prediction of the general theory of relativity" Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez "for the discovery of a supermassive compact object at the centre of our galaxy" 2019 James Peebles "for theoretical discoveries in physical cosmology" Michel Mayor, Didier Queloz "for the discovery of an exoplanet orbiting a solar-type star" 2018 Arthur Ashkin "for groundbreaking inventions in the field of laser physics", in particular "for the optical tweezers and their application to Gerard Mourou, Donna Strickland biological systems" "for groundbreaking inventions in the field of laser physics", in particular "for their method of generating high-intensity, ultra-short optical pulses" Nobel Laureates in Physics Year Names Achievement 2017 Rainer Weiss "for decisive contributions to the LIGO detector and the Kip Thorne, Barry Barish observation of gravitational waves" 2016 David J. Thouless, "for theoretical discoveries of topological phase transitions F. Duncan M. Haldane, and topological phases of matter" John M. Kosterlitz 2015 Takaaki Kajita, "for the discovery of neutrino oscillations, which shows that Arthur B. MsDonald neutrinos have mass" 2014 Isamu Akasaki, "for the invention of
    [Show full text]
  • Discovery of a New Particle
    Discovery of a New Particle! Experimental High-Energy Physics Group! McGill! Homer’s Physics 101! 2012.September.28! ! http://nonsensibleshoes.com http://twitter.com! 2! Leon Lederman Quotations! ! ! “god particle” nickname: because the particle ! “…is so central to the state of physics today, so crucial to our final understanding of the structure of matter, yet so elusive…”! 1993! http://wikipedia.org! A second reason: because “…the publisher wouldn’t let us call it the Goddamn Particle, though that might be a more appropriate title, given its villainous nature and the expense it is causing.”! 3! Reductionism Epitomised! Condensed-Matter! &" Low Energies! Atomic Physics! Nuclear" Physics! High-Energy" Particle Physics! 4! The (known) Fundamental Particles & Forces! Note: gravity is (temporarily) omitted! 5! What gives masses to fundamental particles such as quarks and electrons, and why are they so different? Important Distinction:! ! We already know how composite matter! (e.g., atoms, fish, pizza, planets, people)! gets most of its mass:! binding E = mc2! ! ! 6! ! So why should you care about the fundamental stuff?! ! ! Q: If your fundamental particles had no mass, what" would they be doing?! ! ! A: They’d all be zipping around at the speed of light.! !!- no fish! !!- no pizza! No us…! !!- no planets! ! 7! ! But the issue of masses of fundamental particles" really takes its origins from the time of Rutherford! Nuclear Physics! Radioactivity:! atoms transmute! Lord Rutherford" ! ! Particle Physics! Force is weak because W particle is massive!!
    [Show full text]
  • Edit Winter 2012/13
    Winter 2012|13 THE ALUMNI MAGAZINE + billet & general COUNCIL PAPERS prOfessor pETEr HIGGS on breakthroughs, the boson and the best of edinburgh TIDE Of INNOvation our energy experts embrace the ocean’s poWer ALSO INSIDE 300 years of chemistry, and counting | our iconic library unveiled | careers in the spotlight winter 2012|13 contents foreWord contents elcome to the winter 2012/13 issue of Edit. It’s 16 10 Walways interesting to hear your stories about how your time at Edinburgh helped you stand out from the crowd, and in this edition we take the opportunity to introduce you to just a few of your fellow trailblazing academics and alumni. Professor Peter Higgs, whose 1964 theory led 48 years later to the discovery of the Higgs boson, is now a name known worldwide – but many 04 08 of his passions remain close to home (p8). The unique marine testing facility due to open at King’s Buildings in 2013 (p14) is another Edinburgh breakthrough with a debt to the past. Inside, we also celebrate the many milestones of the School of Chemistry (p22), take you on 30 a tour of our revamped Main Library (p10), and highlight how our innovative online teaching programmes continue to break new ground for today’s students (p26). Whether you’re a recent graduate or studied at Edinburgh long ago, we’d love for you to share your stories and memories with us. With all best wishes for the holiday season. 08 the interview 04 update Professor Peter Higgs on Kirsty MacDonald breakthroughs, the boson 20 alumni profiles and the best of Edinburgh Director of Development
    [Show full text]
  • Topological Defects in Cosmology 1 1.1 Introduction
    Topological Defects in Cosmology 1 Alejandro Gangui Instituto de Astronom´ıay F´ısica del Espacio, Ciudad Universitaria, 1428 Buenos Aires, Argentina and Dept. de F´ısica, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Universitaria – Pab. I, 1428 Buenos Aires, Argentina Abstract Topological defects are ubiquitous in condensed–matter physics but only hypothetical in the early universe. In spite of this, even an indirect evidence for one of these cosmic objects would revolu- tionize our vision of the cosmos. We give here an introduction to the subject of cosmic topological defects and their possible observable signatures. Beginning with a review of the basics of general defect formation and evolution, we then focus on mainly two topics in some detail: conducting strings and vorton formation, and some specific imprints in the cosmic microwave background radiation from simulated cosmic strings. arXiv:astro-ph/0110285v1 11 Oct 2001 1Lecture Notes for the First Bolivian School on Cosmology La Paz, 24–28 September, 2001 http://www.umsanet.edu.bo/fisica/cosmo2k1.html i ii Contents 1 Topological Defects in Cosmology 1 1.1 Introduction...................................... .. 1 1.1.1 Howdefectsform ................................. 2 1.1.2 Phase transitions and finite temperature field theory . ...... 4 1.1.3 TheKibblemechanism.............................. 5 1.1.4 Asurveyoftopologicaldefects. ... 6 1.1.5 Conditions for their existence: topological criteria . ...... 8 1.2 Defectsintheuniverse ............................... ... 9 1.2.1 Local and global monopoles and domain walls . 10 1.2.2 Aredefectsinflatedaway? . .. .. .. 11 1.2.3 Cosmicstrings .................................. 12 1.2.4 String loops and scaling . 14 1.2.5 Globaltextures .................................. 17 1.2.6 Evolution of global textures . 18 1.3 Currentsalongstrings ..............................
    [Show full text]
  • Research on Quantum Physics Important Principles and Photoelectric Effect
    ISSN(Online): 2319-8753 ISSN (Print): 2347-6710 International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology (A High Impact Factor, Monthly, Peer Reviewed Journal) Visit: www.ijirset.com Vol. 6, Issue 12, December 2017 Research on Quantum Physics Important Principles and Photoelectric Effect Dr. Purnima Shrivastava Department of Physics, Rani Durgavati Vishwavidyalaya, Jabalpur M.P, India ABSTRACT: Quantum mechanics (QM; also known as quantum physics or quantum theory), including quantum field theory, is a fundamental theory in physics which describes nature at the smallest scales of energy levels of atoms and subatomic particles. Classical physics (the physics existing before quantum mechanics) is a set of fundamental theories which describes nature at ordinary (macroscopic) scale. Most theories in classical physics can be derived from quantum mechanics as an approximation valid at large (macroscopic) scale.[3] Quantum mechanics differs from classical physics in that: energy, momentum and other quantities of a system may be restricted to discrete values (quantization), objects have characteristics of both particles and waves (wave-particle duality), and there are limits to the precision with which quantities can be known (uncertainty principle). I. INTRODUCTION Physics is a means to describe the world around us. It makes use of facts, theories and experiments in order to determine certain physical quantities. Physicists are always looking for knowledge, trying to understand everything. One of the basic physical ideas is that everything can be known. To know everything might be difficult. It might even be practically impossible, but theoretically it must be possible. This is the main goal of physics: to know everything.
    [Show full text]