DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Impact Assessment of the Power Lines from the Kudu Gas Power Station (Uubvlei Site) to Oranjemond and Obib Respectively

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Impact Assessment of the Power Lines from the Kudu Gas Power Station (Uubvlei Site) to Oranjemond and Obib Respectively ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF THE POWER LINES FROM THE KUDU GAS POWER STATION (UUBVLEI SITE) TO ORANJEMOND AND OBIB RESPECTIVELY Final Route Evaluation and Environmental Impact Report Volume 1 Prepared by: Enviro Dynamics (Pty) Ltd P O Box 20837 Windhoek Namibia Tel: 264 61 223336 Fax: 264 61 240309 E-mail: [email protected] June 2005 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Page i The EIA Team and Acknowledgements The EIA Team The following specialists contributed to this study: Ms Stephanie van Zyl: Team Leader, Socio-economic issues, Public Participation, Enviro Dynamics John Pallett Ecology and Fauna excluding avi-fauna, EEAN Ms Coleen Mannheimer: Botany, individual consultant Mr Chris van Rooyen Ornithologist, Endangered Wildlife Trust Dr Dieter Noli Archaeology, individual consultant Acknowledgements The following people are thanked for their input to this study: Mr John Langford of NamPower for providing technical background, working with the team to communicate with affected parties and to find an optimum route, attending meetings, and handling the administration of the project; The team specialists who conducted their studies amidst a very tight schedule; Bob Burrel, Dawn Jones and Belinda Beukes for assisting with logistics, holding meetings and providing data; Jono Smith, the logistics manager of NamPower in Oranjemund, for assisting with logistics and escorting some of the specialists; and Dr Peter Tarr of SAIEA for his guidance and thorough review of the EIA process. EIA Transmission Lines from Kudu Gas Power Plant at Uubvlei Final Route Evaluation and EIR June 2005 Page i Table of Contents Table of Contents 1 Background 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.1.1 The Kudu CCGT Power Station 1 1.1.2 Work done to date 2 1.1.3 The downstream component 2 1.2 Report layout 5 1.3 Terms of Reference 5 1.4 Approach to the Study 6 1.5 Assumptions and Limitations 6 2 Administrative, legal and policy requirements 7 2.1 Policy and legislation dealing with environmental conservation and management 7 2.2 Namibia’s commitment to international conventions 8 2.3 International Finance Corporation (IFC) / World Bank Guidelines 8 3 Description of the project 9 3.1 Project rationale 9 3.2 Purpose of the proposed activity 9 3.3 Details of the Kudu CCGT Power Plant Site 9 3.4 Power line details 11 3.4.1 Locality of alternative routes 11 3.4.2 Power line designs 16 3.4.3 Corridor widths 17 3.4.4 Construction activities 17 3.4.5 Maintenance activities 18 3.4.6 Natural material and human resources required 18 3.4.7 Waste materials 18 4 Project Alternatives 19 4.1 Introduction 19 4.2 Kudu Power Plant Location Alternatives 19 4.2.1 Regional location 19 4.2.2 Oranjemund sites 19 4.3 Summary of alternative projects 22 4.4 Overhead vs. underground cable 23 4.5 No-project alternative 24 EIA Transmission Lines from Kudu Gas Power Plant at Uubvlei Final Route Evaluation and EIR June 2005 Page ii Table of Contents 5 Stakeholder Consultation and Scoping 25 5.1 Consultation approach 25 5.2 Key issues and concerns 26 6 The receiving environment 29 6.1 Introduction 29 6.2 The socio-economic environment 29 6.2.1 Community and stakeholder concerns 29 6.2.2 Methodology and data sources 29 6.2.3 Description 30 6.2.4 Existing infrastructure 35 6.2.5 Implications and criteria for route planning 35 6.3 Climate 36 6.3.1 Stakeholder and community concerns 36 6.3.2 Data sources 36 6.3.3 Description 36 6.3.4 Implications and criteria for route planning 37 6.4 Topography 38 6.4.1 Community and stakeholder concerns 38 6.4.2 Data sources and methodology 38 6.4.3 Description 38 6.4.4 Implications and criteria for route planning 38 6.5 Geology and soils 39 6.5.1 Community and stakeholder concerns 39 6.5.2 Methodology and data sources 39 6.5.3 Description 39 6.6 Hydrology and the wetland system 40 6.6.1 Stakeholder and community concerns 40 6.6.2 Data sources 40 6.6.3 Description 40 6.6.4 Implications and criteria for route evaluation 41 6.7 Vegetation 42 6.7.1 Stakeholder and community concerns 42 6.7.2 Methodology and data sources 42 6.7.3 Description 42 6.7.4 Implications and criteria for route planning 48 6.8 Fauna 48 6.8.1 Community and stakeholder concerns 48 6.8.2 Methodology and data sources 48 6.8.3 Description 48 6.8.4 Implications and criteria for route evaluation 51 6.9 Birds 51 6.9.1 Stakeholder and community concerns 51 6.9.2 Description 51 EIA Transmission Lines from Kudu Gas Power Plant at Uubvlei Final Route Evaluation and EIR June 2005 Page iii Table of Contents 6.9.3 Implications and criteria for route planning 52 6.10 Archaeology 54 6.10.1 Data sources and methods 54 6.10.2 Description 54 6.10.3 Implications and criteria for route planning 54 7 Route Evaluation and Assessment 56 7.1 Methodology 56 7.2 List of potential impacts 56 7.3 Evaluation and assessment 58 7.3.1 Diamond reserve lock-up 59 7.3.2 Visual Impact 61 7.3.3 Bird impacts 64 7.3.4 Impacts on fauna 66 7.3.5 Impact on vegetation 67 7.3.6 Destruction of or damage to archaeological and paeleontological records 70 7.3.7 Further details of route sections 72 7.4 Conclusion 73\ 8 Conclusions and Recommendations 75 8.1 Introduction 75 8.2 Route evaluation and environmental assessment 75 8.3 Final Recommendations 76 9 References 77 List of Appendices (Volume 2) Appendix 1: Details of Scoping Appendix 2: Bird Impact Assessment Appendix 3: Archaeological Assessment Appendix 4: Botanical Assessment Appendix 5: Terrestrial Ecological Assessment EIA Transmission Lines from Kudu Gas Power Plant at Uubvlei Final Route Evaluation and EIR June 2005 Page iv Table of Contents List of Figures Figure 1-1: Map of Namibia ..................................................................................................... 1 Figure 1-2: Location of Uubvlei relative to Oranjemund and Site D ......................................... 3 Figure 3-1 Site layout at Uubvlei (Source: NamPower) ........................................................ 10 Figure 3-2: Preliminary Alternatives. ..................................................................................... 12 Figure 3-3: Alternative routes considered during the EIA ....................................................... 15 Figure 3-4: Strain tower ......................................................................................................... 16 Figure 3-5: Compact Cross Rope Suspension Tower ........................................................... 16 Figure 4-1: Site Alternatives for the CCGT Power Plant at Oranjemund (Source: NamPower) ............................................................................................................................. 19 Figure 4-2: Power line routes considered for the Site D scenario ......................................... 21 Figure 6-1: Land Use, Infrastructure, landscape and topography of the study area .............. 33 Figure 6-2: Future Land Use and Infrastructure in the Sperrgebiet. The proposed power line route shown has been approved by the Ministry of Environment and Tourism upon an EIA that was conducted in 1998. (Source: Sperrgebiet Land Use Plan)34 Figure 6-3: Crassula atropurpurea var. cultriformis, a protected endemic species found in Zone A ................................................................................................................. 43 Figure 6-4: Area before Swartbult, rich in C. atropurpurea var. cultriformis .......................... 43 Figure 6-5: Distribution of vegetation around Oranjemund .................................................... 44 Figure 6-6: Sandy hummocks dominated by Cladoraphis spinosa and Brownanthus arenosus .............................................................................................................. 45 Figure 6-7: Gravelly-sandy flat dominated by Brownanthus arenosus .................................. 45 Figure 6-8: Low diversity on plains below the Schakalberge ................................................ 46 Figure 6-9: Higher diversity spot in the dune zone (Zone D) with the tall Zygophyllum prismatocarpum in the background ..................................................................... 46 Figure 6-10: Grassy plains near Obib ................................................................................... 47 Figure 6-11: Haemanthus pubescens subsp. arenicola, a rare geophyte found blooming on the grassy plains west of Obib ............................................................................. 47 Figure 6-12: Important bird habitats and flight paths in the study area .................................. 53 Figure 6-13: Location of archaeological remains around Oranjemund .................................. 55 Figure 7-1: Location of proposed power line routes north of the Orange River in relation to potential diamond reserves in the Paeleo Channel of the Orange River (Blue and red dots show the location of preliminary exploration efforts) .............................. 60 Figure 7-2: The Obib Mountain area near Skorpion, with its attractive wilderness qualities. 63 Figure 7-3: Visibility of shield wires vs bundled conductors .................................................. 64 EIA Transmission Lines from Kudu Gas Power Plant at Uubvlei Final Route Evaluation and EIR June 2005 Page v Table of Contents List of Tables Table 3-1: Co-ordinates of the routes investigated during the EIA ....................................... 14 Table 4-1: Summary table of alternatives considered (Source: CSIR, 2004) ....................... 23 Table 5-1: Issues identified and how they have been addressed during this study
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Mineral Industry of Namibia in 1999
    THE MINERAL INDUSTRY OF NAMIBIA By George J. Coakley Namibia is located on the southwestern coast of Africa many years, De Beers Consolidated Mines Ltd. had held an between South Africa and Angola. The 825,418-square- exclusive right to exploit the diamond-bearing Orange River kilometer country had an estimated population of 1.77 million alluvial and marine beach sand deposits within the Sperrgebiet. in 1999 and a gross domestic product (GDP) per capita of about Namdeb Diamond Corp. (Pty.) Ltd. increased diamond $4,3001 based on purchasing power parity. In 1999, the mineral production to nearly 1.3 million carats, or about comparable industry of Namibia provided about 43% of exports and 20% of with that of 1998. Namdeb began phasing out production at its the country’s GDP (U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, Auchas Mine and planned to open the new Daberas Mine at the Namibia—Economy—World factbook, accessed December 5, end of 2000; the new mine will have an expected mine life of 10 2000, at URL http://www.odci.gov/cia/publications/Factbook/ years. During its first full year of operation, De Beers’ geos/wa.html#Econ). Diamond remained the most important NamGem Diamond Manufacturing Co. diamond cutting and sector of the mining industry followed by uranium, for which polishing plant near Okahandja produced 100 finished stones Namibia ranked as the world’s fourth largest producer. per day at an average size of 14 points based on 100 points to a Namibia was also the largest producer of salt in Africa. carat. According to the Chamber of Mines of Namibia (2000, p.
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa and Namibia, 20 July - 12 August 2017
    South Africa and Namibia, 20 July - 12 August 2017. VLADIMIR DINETS This trip was an introduction to Africa for my wife and daughter; the latter was two and a half years old at the time and enjoyed it a lot. We had three weeks to kill while a container with our stuff was traveling from New Jersey to our new home in Okinawa. We started from Cape Town, drove east to Hermanus and then north to Oranjemund, flew to Windhoek, briefly explored a few locations up to Etosha, returned to Windhoek and spent one day and two nights in Johannesburg. In 2017, Cape Town area, Namaqualand and Namibia were experiencing a major drought. Full moon was on August 7; that made finding small mammals difficult during the Namibian part of the trip. I had six Sherman traps and caught only twelve rodents of two species (two pygmy mice in the far south and Namaqua rock rats almost everywhere else). Bats seemed absent with few exceptions. I saw almost a hundred species, all but four of which I had seen before (see my 2008 trip report), and removed a few species from my “better view much desired” list. South Africa Simon’s Town is a convenient base for exploring the area; M4 south from it is a good place to look for chacma baboons, while humpback whales are often feeding offshore (we saw one, and heard a few while scuba diving). Watch for South African fur seals, too. Four-striped grass mice (locally called “field mice”) were abundant in wooded parts of penguin colonies.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Scoping Report for the Heritage Assessment Related to the Proposed Eskom Kudu-Oranjemund Project in the Northern Cape Province
    Archaetnos Culture & Cultural Resource Consultants BK 98 09854/23 SCOPING REPORT FOR THE HERITAGE ASSESSMENT RELATED TO THE PROPOSED ESKOM KUDU-ORANJEMUND PROJECT IN THE NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE For: LANDSCAPE DYNAMICS PO Box 947 Groenkloof 0027 REPORT: AE01639V By: Prof. A.C. van Vollenhoven (L. Akad. S.A.) BA, BA (Hons), DTO, NDM, MA (UP), MA (US), DPhil (UP), Man Dip (TUT), DPhil (History) Accredited member of ASAPA Accredited member of SASCH July 2016 Archaetnos P.0.Box 55 GROENKLOOF 0027 Tel: 083 291 6104 Fax: 086 520 4173 Email: [email protected] Members: AC van Vollenhoven BA, BA (Hons), DTO, NDM, MA (Archaeology) [UP], MA (Culture History) [US], DPhil (Archaeology) [UP], Man Dip [TUT], DPhil (History) [US] 1 1. Introduction This report deals with the results of a scoping baseline (desktop) study relating to the Heritage Assessment for the proposed ESKOM Kudu-Oranjemund Project. The project entails the following: Establishment of the existing 400kV AT Oranjemund including – . 400kV yard and equipment including busbar; . Installing a 1 x 315MVA 400/220kV transformer; . Create at least 4 x 400kV line bays to allow for potential development; Construction of 2 x 400kV lines from the Orange River to Oranjemund Substation – approximately 5 km of which a 3 km wide corridor should be investigated and authorized. 2. Methodology Terms of reference . Identify as much as possible objects, sites, occurrences and structures of an archaeological or historical nature (cultural heritage sites) located on the property. Assess the significance of the cultural resources in terms of their archaeological, historical, scientific, social, religious, aesthetic and tourism value.
    [Show full text]
  • KELP BLUE NAMIBIA (Pty) Ltd
    KELP BLUE NAMIBIA (Pty) Ltd EIA SCOPING & IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE PROPOSED KELP CULTIVATION PILOT PROJECT NEAR LÜDERITZ, KARAS REGION Prepared for: Kelp Blue Namibia (Pty) Ltd August 2020 1 DOCUMENT CONTROL Report Title EIA SCOPING & IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED KELP CULTIVATION PILOT PROJECT NEAR LÜDERITZ, KARAS REGION Report Author Werner Petrick Client Kelp Blue Namibia (Pty) Ltd Project Number NSP2020KB01 Report Number 1 Status Final to MEFT and MFMR Issue Date August 2020 DISCLAIMER The views expressed in the document are the objective, independent views of the author with input from various Environmental and Social Experts (i.e. Specialists). Neither Werner Petrick nor Namisun Environmental Projects and Development (Namisun) have any business, personal, financial, or other interest in the proposed Project apart from fair remuneration for the work performed. The content of this report is based on the author’s best scientific and professional knowledge, input from the Environmental Specialists, as well as available information. Project information contained herein is based on the interpretation of data collected and data provided by the client, accepted in good faith as being accurate and valid. Namisun reserves the right to modify the report in any way deemed necessary should new, relevant, or previously unavailable or undisclosed information become available that could alter the assessment findings. This report must not be altered or added to without the prior written consent of the author. Project Nr: NSP2020KB01 EIA SCOPING & IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT AND EMP FOR August 2020 Report number: 1 THE PROPOSED KELP CULTIVATION PILOT PROJECT 2 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Mineral Industry of Namibia in 2016
    2016 Minerals Yearbook NAMIBIA [ADVANCE RELEASE] U.S. Department of the Interior February 2020 U.S. Geological Survey The Mineral Industry of Namibia By James J. Barry In 2016, the diamond sector continued to be a significant 16%, for Swakop Uranium; about 10%, for Rössing Uranium contributor to Namibia’s economy. In terms of the average Ltd.; and 9% each, for B2Gold Namibia (Pty) Ltd., De Beers value of diamond production in dollars per carat ($533), the Marine Namibia (Pty) Ltd. (Debmarine), and Skorpion Zinc and country ranked second in the world after Lesotho. In terms of Namzinc (Pty) Ltd. (Chamber of Mines of Namibia, 2017, p. 19, the total value of its rough diamond production ($915 million), 90–91). the country ranked fifth after South Africa. Namibia was ranked ninth in the world in terms of rough diamond production by Production weight (carats). Namibia’s total diamond exports were valued at In 2016, copper electrowon production increased by 54% about $1.1 billion (about 1.9 million carats of diamond) in 2016. to 16,391 metric tons (t) from 10,659 t in 2015, which was According to the World Nuclear Association, Namibia’s Rössing attributed to the Tschudi Mine reaching nameplate capacity Mine and Langer Heinrich Mine were capable of providing 10% of 17,000 metric tons per year (t/yr). Uranium production of the world’s uranium output; the Langer Heinrich Mine was increased by 22% to 3,654 t (uranium content) in 2016 from one of the leading producing uranium mines in the world. The 2,993 t in 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • The Environmental Management Plan for Establishing Agricultural Projects Within the Oranjemund Constituency Report No: 201219A 20 December 2019
    The Environmental Management Plan for establishing Agricultural Projects within the Oranjemund Constituency Report No: 201219A 20 December 2019 Prepared for: Prepared by: Oranjemund Constituency Office KPM Environmental Consulting P.O. Box 705 P.O. Box 26328 Oranjemund Windhoek Namibia Namibia Office: +264 63 233 367 Office: +264 81 147 3344 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Document Status Proponent Oranjemund Constituency Office Title of the The Environmental Management Plan for establishing proposed Activity Agricultural Projects within the Oranjemund Constituency Activity Type Establishment of Agricultural Projects Location of the The Agricultural Project will be located along the Orange River Activity and between Oranjemund and Rosh Pinah at four different areas: • Farm 212 Hohenfels GPS Coordinates: 16.81000000 and 29.20750000 • Lucerne A and Lucerne B GPS Coordinates: 16.72416667 and 28.46027778 • Upper portion closer to Plot B of Debaras 2 GPS Coordinates: 17.32388889 and 29.20750000 • Rosh Pinah GPS Coordinates: 17.01055556 and 28.54805556 Competent Environmental Commission (Ministry of Environment and Authority Tourism) EIA Consultant KPM Environmental Consulting Contact person: Mr. Festus Kapembe Tel. +264 81 147 3344 E-mail: [email protected] Proponent Mr. Lazarus Nangolo Constituency Councillor Oranjemund Constituency //Kharas Region Council P.O. Box 705 Oranjemund Tel. +264 63 233 367 EIA for establishing Agricultural Projects within the Oranjemund Constituency Page 1 PURPOSE OF THIS DOCUMENT This document, Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report and Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for the establishment of an Agricultural Project for Oranjemund Constituency Office presents the findings of the impact assessment with respect to issues and concerns raised during the scoping phase of the EIA.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Social Responsibility, Mining and Sustainable Development in Namibia: Critical Reflections Through a Relational Lens
    Corporate social responsibility, mining and sustainable development in Namibia: critical reflections through a relational lens Article Accepted Version Littlewood, D. (2015) Corporate social responsibility, mining and sustainable development in Namibia: critical reflections through a relational lens. Development Southern Africa, 32 (2). pp. 240-257. ISSN 1470-3637 doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2014.984833 Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/38508/ It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. See Guidance on citing . To link to this article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2014.984833 Publisher: Taylor & Francis All outputs in CentAUR are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including copyright law. Copyright and IPR is retained by the creators or other copyright holders. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the End User Agreement . www.reading.ac.uk/centaur CentAUR Central Archive at the University of Reading Reading’s research outputs online Cite as: Littlewood, D. (2015) Corporate social responsibility, mining and sustainable development in Namibia: Critical reflections through a relational lens, Development Southern Africa, DOI:10.1080/0376835X.2014.984833 Corporate social responsibility, mining and sustainable development in Namibia: Critical reflections through a relational lens Dr David Littlewood Lecturer in Reputation and Responsibility, Henley Business School, Greenlands Campus, Henley-on-Thames, Oxfordshire, RG9 3AU, UK. Tel: +44 (0) 1491 414 559. Email: [email protected] For its advocates Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) represents a powerful tool through which business and particularly multinationals can play a more direct role in global sustainable development.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Profile – Namibia
    Country profile – Namibia Version 2005 Recommended citation: FAO. 2005. AQUASTAT Country Profile – Namibia. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Rome, Italy The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way. All requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial use rights should be made via www.fao.org/contact-us/licencerequest or addressed to [email protected]. FAO information products are available on the FAO website (www.fao.org/ publications) and can be purchased through [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Scoping Report and Emp for Rosh Pinah Zinc Corporation's (Rpzc) Exploration Activities on Epl 2616
    SCOPING REPORT AND EMP FOR ROSH PINAH ZINC CORPORATION'S (RPZC) EXPLORATION ACTIVITIES ON EPL 2616 AMENDMENT OCTOBER 2019 Compiled for: Rosh Pinah Zinc Corporation Private Bag 2001 / Rosh Pinah Namibia Compiled by: A. Speiser Environmental Consultants cc PO Box 40386 Windhoek Namibia TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS .............................................................................................................................. 6 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 7 1.1 Reason for the amendment .......................................................................................... 7 1.2 Introduction to the existing exploration activities ........................................................... 8 1.2.1 History of EPL 2616 .............................................................................................. 8 1.3 Motivation for the exploration activities ......................................................................... 9 1.4 Introduction to the environmental impact assessment for the proposed exploration activities ....................................................................................................................... 9 1.4.1 EIA process for the proposed exploration activities on EPL 2616 ........................ 10 1.4.2 EIA Scoping process ........................................................................................... 11 1.4.3 EIA team ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM for the Year Ended December 31, 2020
    ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM For the year ended December 31, 2020 March 31, 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE NO. PRELIMINARY NOTES .................................................................................................................. 2 CORPORATE STRUCTURE .......................................................................................................... 6 DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS ........................................................................................... 7 DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS ............................................................................................ 12 MINERAL PROPERTIES ............................................................................................................ 222 RISK FACTORS ......................................................................................................................... 501 DIVIDENDS ................................................................................................................................... 69 DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE ................................................................................ 69 MARKET FOR SECURITIES ........................................................................................................ 70 DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS ..................................................................................................... 70 LEGAL PROCEEDINGS AND REGULATORY ACTIONS .......................................................... 79 INTEREST OF MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS IN MATERIAL
    [Show full text]
  • 3774 Petrol Prices
    GOVERNMENT GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA N$2.60 WINDHOEK - 19 January 2007 No. 3774 CONTENTS Page GOVERNMENT NOTICE No. 4 Regulations regarding prices for the reselling of petrol: Petroleum Products and Energy Act, 1990 ........................................................................................................................... 1 Government Notice MINISTRY OF MINES AND ENERGY No. 4 2007 REGULATIONS REGARDING PRICES FOR THE RESELLING OF PETROL: PETROLEUM PRODUCTS AND ENERGY ACT, 1990 Under section 2(1)(c) of the Petroleum Products and Energy Act, 1990 (Act No. 13 of 1990), I make the regulations set out in the Schedule below. E. NGHIMTINA MINISTER OF MINES AND ENERGY Windhoek, 16 January 2007 SCHEDULE PRICES AT WHICH PETROL MAY BE RESOLD Defi nitions 1. In these regulations, unless the context otherwise indicates - “petrol” includes any mixture of petrol with any other substance, which mixture can be used as fuel for the operation of a spark ignition engine; 2 Government Gazette 19 January 2007 No. 3774 “reseller” means any person who, whether he or she has a petrol pump in operation in terms of an arrangement with a wholesale distributor or not, acquires petrol directly from a wholesale distributor and sells it to any other person in the course of or as part of the activities of a business carried on by him or her, but does not include any such person in relation to petrol which he or she sells in terms of an agreement with a wholesale distributor only in quantities of not less than 200 litres at a time; “the Act” means the Petroleum Products and Energy Act, 1990 (Act No.
    [Show full text]
  • Final EIA and EMP Report
    Final Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and Environmental Management Plan (EMP) to Support the Application for Environmental Clearance Certificate (ECC) for the Proposed Upgrading of the Oranjemund Logistic Aviation Base (Oranjemund Airport ), Oranjemund //KARAS REGION, SOUTHERN NAMIBIA De Beers Marine Namibia (Pty) Ltd Namdeb Centre, 10 Dr. Frans Indongo Street P.O. Box 23016 WINDHOEK, NAMIBIA EIA and EMP Report i DBMN Oranjemund Logistic Aviation Base-June 2019 CLIENT / PROPONENT / OFFSHORE OPERATOR INFORMATION De Beers Marine Namibia (Pty) Ltd Address: 4th Floor, Namdeb Centre 10 Dr. Frans Indongo Street WINDHOEK, NAMIBIA. Responsible Person: Chief Executive Officer Tel No.: +264 61 297 8000 Fax No.: +264 61 297 8100 Contact Person: Environmental Manager Tel No.: + 264 61 297 8215 Fax No.: + 264 61 297 8120 Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and Environmental Management Plan (EMP) Report Prepared By Risk-Based Solutions (RBS) CC WINDHOEK, NAMIBIA, JUNE 2019 CITATION: Risk-Based Solutions (RBS), 2019. Final Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and Environmental Management Plan (EMP) to Support the Application for Environmental Clearance Certificate (ECC) for the Proposed Upgrading of the Oranjemund Logistic Aviation Base (Oranjemund Airport) in //Karas Region, Southern Namibia by De Beers Marine Namibia (DBMN) (Pty) Ltd EIA and EMP Report ii DBMN Oranjemund Logistic Aviation Base-June 2019 PROPONENT, LISTED ACTIVITIES AND RELATED INFORMATION SUMMARY PROPOSED PROJECT Upgrading of the Oranjemund Logistics Aviation Base (OLAB)
    [Show full text]