DOCSLIB.ORG

Trevali Mining Corporation Technical Report on the Rosh Pinah Mine

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Trevali Mining Corporation Technical Report on the Rosh Pinah Mine TREVALI MINING CORPORATION TECHNICAL REPORT ON THE ROSH PINAH MINE, NAMIBIA NI 43-101 Report Qualified Persons: Torben Jensen, P.Eng. Ian T. Blakley, P.Geo., EurGeol Tracey Jacquemin, Pr.Sci.Nat. Avakash A. Patel, P.Eng. May 1, 2018 RPA 55 University Ave. Suite 501 I Toronto, ON, Canada M5J 2H7 IT + 1 (416) 947 0907 www.rpacan.com Report Control Form Document Title Technical Report on the Rosh Pinah Mine, Namibia Client Name & Address Trevali Mining Corporation 1400 – 1199 West Hastings Street Vancouver, British Columbia Canada, V6E 3T5 Document Reference Project #2927 Status & FINAL Issue No. Version Issue Date May 1, 2018 Lead Authors Torben Jensen (Signed) Ian T. Blakley (Signed) Tracey Jacquemin (Signed) Avakash A. Patel (Signed) Peer Reviewer David JF Smith (Signed) Project Manager Approval Torben Jensen (Signed) Project Director Approval Graham Clow (Signed) Report Distribution Name No. of Copies Client RPA Filing 1 (project box) Roscoe Postle Associates Inc. 55 University Avenue, Suite 501 Toronto, ON M5J 2H7 Canada Tel: +1 416 947 0907 Fax: +1 416 947 0395 [email protected] www.rpacan.com TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1 SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... 1-1 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... 1-1 Economic Analysis ......................................................................................................... 1-7 Technical Summary ..................................................................................................... 1-13 2 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 2-1 3 RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS ................................................................................. 3-1 4 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION ................................................................ 4-1 Mineral Rights and Land Ownership .............................................................................. 4-1 Surface Rights ............................................................................................................... 4-5 Royalties and Lease Obligations .................................................................................. 4-10 5 ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE AND PHYSIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................... 5-1 Accessibility ................................................................................................................... 5-1 Climate .......................................................................................................................... 5-1 Local Resources ............................................................................................................ 5-2 Infrastructure ................................................................................................................. 5-2 Power ............................................................................................................................ 5-3 Water ............................................................................................................................. 5-4 Physiography ................................................................................................................. 5-4 6 HISTORY ........................................................................................................................ 6-1 Prior Ownership ............................................................................................................. 6-1 Exploration and Development History ............................................................................ 6-2 Historical Resource Estimates ....................................................................................... 6-2 Past Production ............................................................................................................. 6-2 7 GEOLOGICAL SETTING AND MINERALIZATION .......................................................... 7-1 Regional Geology .......................................................................................................... 7-1 Structural Geology ......................................................................................................... 7-3 Local and Property Geology........................................................................................... 7-4 Mineralization ................................................................................................................ 7-4 Lens Characterization .................................................................................................... 7-9 Primary Lenses ............................................................................................................ 7-16 Secondary Lenses ....................................................................................................... 7-27 8 DEPOSIT TYPES ............................................................................................................ 8-1 9 EXPLORATION ............................................................................................................... 9-1 Exploration Process and Techniques ............................................................................. 9-1 Exploration Potential Within Rosh Pinah Mine ............................................................... 9-3 Exploration Potential Within EPL 2616 ........................................................................... 9-9 Trevali Mining Corporation – Rosh Pinah Mine, Project #2927 Technical Report NI 43-101 – May 1, 2018 Page i www.rpacan.com Gergarub Project ......................................................................................................... 9-11 10 DRILLING .................................................................................................................... 10-1 Survey Grids ................................................................................................................ 10-3 Drill Planning and Site Preparation .............................................................................. 10-3 Collar Surveys ............................................................................................................. 10-3 Downhole Surveying .................................................................................................... 10-4 Geological Logging ...................................................................................................... 10-4 Geotechnical Logging .................................................................................................. 10-7 Sampling ...................................................................................................................... 10-7 11 SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES AND SECURITY ............................................ 11-1 Sample Preparation and Analysis ................................................................................ 11-1 Quality Assurance and Quality Control ........................................................................ 11-3 Security...................................................................................................................... 11-16 12 DATA VERIFICATION ................................................................................................. 12-1 Site Visit....................................................................................................................... 12-1 Rosh Pinah Database Verification Procedures............................................................. 12-1 External Drill Hole Data Validation ............................................................................... 12-3 13 MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING ..................................... 13-1 14 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE ............................................................................. 14-1 Summary ..................................................................................................................... 14-1 Cut-Off Grade .............................................................................................................. 14-4 Primary Lenses ............................................................................................................ 14-5 Secondary Lenses ..................................................................................................... 14-29 Mineral Resource Reconciliation ................................................................................ 14-29 15 MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATE ................................................................................ 15-1 Summary ..................................................................................................................... 15-1 Mining Modifying Factors ............................................................................................. 15-5 Plant Modifying Factors ............................................................................................... 15-6 Financial Modifying Factors ......................................................................................... 15-7 Mining Revenue ........................................................................................................... 15-8 Geological Resource Models Used for Evaluation ......................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Mineral Industry of Namibia in 1999
    THE MINERAL INDUSTRY OF NAMIBIA By George J. Coakley Namibia is located on the southwestern coast of Africa many years, De Beers Consolidated Mines Ltd. had held an between South Africa and Angola. The 825,418-square- exclusive right to exploit the diamond-bearing Orange River kilometer country had an estimated population of 1.77 million alluvial and marine beach sand deposits within the Sperrgebiet. in 1999 and a gross domestic product (GDP) per capita of about Namdeb Diamond Corp. (Pty.) Ltd. increased diamond $4,3001 based on purchasing power parity. In 1999, the mineral production to nearly 1.3 million carats, or about comparable industry of Namibia provided about 43% of exports and 20% of with that of 1998. Namdeb began phasing out production at its the country’s GDP (U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, Auchas Mine and planned to open the new Daberas Mine at the Namibia—Economy—World factbook, accessed December 5, end of 2000; the new mine will have an expected mine life of 10 2000, at URL http://www.odci.gov/cia/publications/Factbook/ years. During its first full year of operation, De Beers’ geos/wa.html#Econ). Diamond remained the most important NamGem Diamond Manufacturing Co. diamond cutting and sector of the mining industry followed by uranium, for which polishing plant near Okahandja produced 100 finished stones Namibia ranked as the world’s fourth largest producer. per day at an average size of 14 points based on 100 points to a Namibia was also the largest producer of salt in Africa. carat. According to the Chamber of Mines of Namibia (2000, p.
    [Show full text]
  • URANIUM MINING in NAMIBIA the Mystery Behind ‘Low Level Radiation’
    URANIUM MINING IN NAMIBIA The mystery behind ‘low level radiation’ Labour Resource and Research Institute January 2009 Erf 8506, Mungunda Str Katutura, Windhoek P.O. Box 62423, Katutura Windhoek, Namibia Tel: + 264-61-212044 Fax: +264-61-217969 E-mail:[email protected] www.larri.com.na ResearchedHilma Shindondola-Mote and compiled by URANIUM MINING IN NAMIBIA The mystery behind ‘low level radiation’ I Labour Resource and Research Institute February 2009 Erf 8506, Mungunda Str Katutura, Windhoek P.O. Box 62423, Katutura Windhoek, Namibia Tel: + 264-61-212044 Fax: +264-61-217969 E-mail:[email protected] www.larri.com.na ISBN: 99916-64-92-0 Researched and compiled by Hilma Shindondola-Mote II Table of Contents Abbreviations.............................................................................................. v Acknowledgements ............................................................................ vi Executive summary ...................................................................................vii 1. Introduction ........................................................................................... 1 1.1. Background and purpose of the study .................................... 1 1.2. Research design ........................................................................ 3 2. Namibia: social and economic profile ................................................... 4 2.1. Employment and Unemloyment ...............................................5 3. Mining industry in Namibia .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Annual Review
    The Chamber of Mines of Namibia Annual Review 2007 - 2008 Mission: To efficiently promote, encourage, protect and foster responsible exploration and mining in Namibia, to the benefit of the country and all stakeholders SIMON WILKIE SIMON Vision: To be acknowledged as the champion of the exploration and mining industry in Namibia Contents Highlights of 2007 - 2008 ............................................................................2 President’s statement ................................................................................3 Chamber activities ......................................................................................6 Overview of operations ............................................................................12 Review of operations ................................................................................17 Navachab ....................................................................................................................................... 17 De Beers Marine Namibia ......................................................................................................... 21 Langer Heinrich ........................................................................................................................... 25 Namdeb ......................................................................................................................................... 29 Okorusu Fluorspar ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 19, 2017 Namibia IGC 2017 N Amibia 35 TH IG C 2017 INTERNATIONAL GEMMOLOGICAL CONFERENCE NAMIBIA October 8 - 19, 2017 Namibia
    35 TH IG C 2017 INTERNATIONAL GEMMOLOGICAL CONFERENCE NAMIBIA October 8 - 19, 2017 Namibia IGC 2017 N 35 TH IG C 2017 INTERNATIONAL GEMMOLOGICAL amibia CONFERENCE NAMIBIA October 8 - 19, 2017 Namibia www.igc-gemmology.org 35th IGC 2017 – Windhoek, Namibia Introduction 35th International Gemmological Conference IGC October 2017 Windhoek, Namibia Dear colleagues of IGC, It is our great pleasure to host the 35th International Gemmological Conference in Windhoek, Namibia. The spectacu- lar landscape, the species-richness of wildlife and the variety of cultures and traditions make Namibia a very popular country to visit. For gemmologists Namibia is of highest interest because of its unique geology, mineral resources and gemstone potential. IGC is an important platform for distinguished gemmologists from all over the world to present and discuss their latest research works but also to cultivate friendship within the gemmological family. It is our great desire to thank the local organizer Andreas Palfi for his extraordinary work to realize the IGC in Namibia. The organizers of 35th International Gemmological Conference wish you an exciting and memorable conference. Dr. Ulrich Henn, Prof. Dr. Henry A. Hänni, Andreas G. Palfi MSc The organizers of the 35th International Gemmological Confe- rence in Namibia. From the left: Andreas Palfi, Ruth Palfi, Ulrich Henn, Annamarie Peyer, Henry A. Hänni at Okapuka Ranch, Namibia in 2016. 1 35th IGC 2017 – Windhoek, Namibia Introduction Organization of the 35th International Gemmological Conference Organizing Committee Dr. Ulrich Henn (German Gemmological Association) Prof. Dr. Henry A. Hänni (Swiss Gemmological Institute SSEF) Andreas G. Palfi MSc (local organizer, Consulting Exploration Geologist, Palfi, Holman and Associates, Geo Tours Namibia and Namibia Minerals) Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 4 (December, 2019)
    Geological Society of Africa Newsletter Volume 9 - Issue 4 (December, 2019) Since the Nobel prize was established, 27 African and African-born persons and African organizations got it. YES Africa can do it !!! Stories inside the issue Africa and Nobel prize CAG28 is approaching Toward a better communication Edited by Tamer Abu-Alam Editor of the GSAf Newsletter In the issue GSAF MATTERS 1 KNOW AFRICA (COVER STORY) 10 GEOLOGY COMIC 11 GEOLOGICAL EXPRESSIONS 11 AFRICAN GEOPARK AND GEOHERITAGE 13 AFRICA'S NOBEL PRIZE WINNERS: A LIST 14 NEWS 23 LITERATURE 30 OPPORTUNITIES 38 CONTACT THE COUNCIL 42 Geological Society of Africa – Newsletter Volume 9 – Issue 4 December 2019 © Geological Society of Africa http://gsafr.org Temporary contact: [email protected] GSAf MATTERS Toward a better and a faster communication among the African community of Geosciences By Tamer Abu-Alam (GSAf newsletter editor and information officer) Information and news should be communicated in a faster way than a newsletter. For example, a deadline to apply for a scholarship can be easily missed if it is not posted to the community at a proper time. As a result, and for better and faster communication among the geological society of Africa, the GSAf will use a Gmail group ([email protected]) to facilitate the communication between society members. Some advice and rules: Since any member can post and all the members will receive your message, please do not overload the society by un-related news. Post only important news that wants immediate action from members. Improper messages can lead its owner to be blocked from posting.
    [Show full text]
  • Mining Conflicts Around the World - September 2012
    Mining conflicts around the world - September 2012 ejolt report no. 7 September, 2012 Mining conflicts around the world Common grounds from an Environmental Justice perspective Begüm Özkaynak and Beatriz Rodríguez-Labajos (coord.) with contributions by Gloria Chicaiza, Marta Conde, Bertchen Kohrs, Dragomira Raeva, Ivonne Yánez, Mariana Walter EJOLT Report No. 07 Mining conflicts around the world - September 2012 September - 2012 EJOLT Report No.: 07 Report coordinated by: Begüm Özkaynak (BU), Beatriz Rodríguez-Labajos (UAB) with chapter contributions by: Gloria Chicaiza (Acción Ecológica), Marta Conde (UAB), Mining Bertchen Kohrs (Earth Life Namibia), Dragomira Raeva (Za Zemiata), Ivonne Yánez (Acción Ecologica), Mariana Walter (UAB) and factsheets by: conflicts Murat Arsel (ISS), Duygu Avcı (ISS), María Helena Carbonell (OCMAL), Bruno Chareyron (CRIIRAD), Federico Demaria (UAB), Renan Finamore (FIOCRUZ), Venni V. Krishna (JNU), Mirinchonme Mahongnao (JNU), Akoijam Amitkumar Singh (JNU), Todor Slavov (ZZ), around Tomislav Tkalec (FOCUS), Lidija Živčič (FOCUS) Design: Jacques bureau for graphic design, NL Layout: the world Cem İskender Aydın Series editor: Beatriz Rodríguez-Labajos The contents of this report may be reproduced in whole or in part for educational or non-profit services without special Common grounds permission from the authors, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. This publication was developed as a part of the project from an Environmental Justice Organisations, Liabilities and Trade (EJOLT) (FP7-Science in Society-2010-1). EJOLT aims to improve policy responses to and support collaborative research and action on environmental Environmental conflicts through capacity building of environmental justice groups around the world. Visit our free resource library and database at Justice perspective www.ejolt.org or follow tweets (@EnvJustice) to stay current on latest news and events.
    [Show full text]
  • Does Uranium Mining Increase Civil Conflict Risk? Evidence from a Spatiotemporal Analysis of Africa from 1945 to 2010
    Inclusion of a paper in the Working Papers series does not constitute publication and should limit in any other venue. Copyright remains with the authors. Inclusion of a paper in the Working Papers serve to disseminate the research results of work in progress prior publicaton encourage exchange ideas and academic debate. Working GIGA GIGA Research Programme: Violence and Security ___________________________ Does Uranium Mining Increase Civil Conflict Risk? Evidence from a Spatiotemporal Analysis of Africa from 1945 to 2010 Carlo Koos and Matthias Basedau No 205 September 2012 www.giga-hamburg.de/workingpapers GIGA Working Papers 205/2012 Edited by the GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies Leibniz‐Institut für Globale und Regionale Studien The GIGA Working Papers series serves to disseminate the research results of work in progress prior to publication in order to encourage the exchange of ideas and academic debate. An objective of the series is to get the findings out quickly, even if the presenta‐ tions are less than fully polished. Inclusion of a paper in the GIGA Working Papers series does not constitute publication and should not limit publication in any other venue. Copy‐ right remains with the authors. When working papers are eventually accepted by or pub‐ lished in a journal or book, the correct citation reference and, if possible, the corresponding link will then be included on the GIGA Working Papers website at <www.giga‐hamburg.de/workingpapers>. GIGA Research Programme “Violence and Security” Copyright for this issue: © Carlo Koos and Matthias Basedau WP Coordination and English‐language Copy Editing: Melissa Nelson Editorial Assistance and Production: Silvia Bücke All GIGA Working Papers are available online and free of charge on the website <www.giga‐hamburg.de/workingpapers>.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mineral Industry of Namibia in 2016
    2016 Minerals Yearbook NAMIBIA [ADVANCE RELEASE] U.S. Department of the Interior February 2020 U.S. Geological Survey The Mineral Industry of Namibia By James J. Barry In 2016, the diamond sector continued to be a significant 16%, for Swakop Uranium; about 10%, for Rössing Uranium contributor to Namibia’s economy. In terms of the average Ltd.; and 9% each, for B2Gold Namibia (Pty) Ltd., De Beers value of diamond production in dollars per carat ($533), the Marine Namibia (Pty) Ltd. (Debmarine), and Skorpion Zinc and country ranked second in the world after Lesotho. In terms of Namzinc (Pty) Ltd. (Chamber of Mines of Namibia, 2017, p. 19, the total value of its rough diamond production ($915 million), 90–91). the country ranked fifth after South Africa. Namibia was ranked ninth in the world in terms of rough diamond production by Production weight (carats). Namibia’s total diamond exports were valued at In 2016, copper electrowon production increased by 54% about $1.1 billion (about 1.9 million carats of diamond) in 2016. to 16,391 metric tons (t) from 10,659 t in 2015, which was According to the World Nuclear Association, Namibia’s Rössing attributed to the Tschudi Mine reaching nameplate capacity Mine and Langer Heinrich Mine were capable of providing 10% of 17,000 metric tons per year (t/yr). Uranium production of the world’s uranium output; the Langer Heinrich Mine was increased by 22% to 3,654 t (uranium content) in 2016 from one of the leading producing uranium mines in the world. The 2,993 t in 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Social Responsibility, Mining and Sustainable Development in Namibia: Critical Reflections Through a Relational Lens
    Corporate social responsibility, mining and sustainable development in Namibia: critical reflections through a relational lens Article Accepted Version Littlewood, D. (2015) Corporate social responsibility, mining and sustainable development in Namibia: critical reflections through a relational lens. Development Southern Africa, 32 (2). pp. 240-257. ISSN 1470-3637 doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2014.984833 Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/38508/ It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. See Guidance on citing . To link to this article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2014.984833 Publisher: Taylor & Francis All outputs in CentAUR are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including copyright law. Copyright and IPR is retained by the creators or other copyright holders. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the End User Agreement . www.reading.ac.uk/centaur CentAUR Central Archive at the University of Reading Reading’s research outputs online Cite as: Littlewood, D. (2015) Corporate social responsibility, mining and sustainable development in Namibia: Critical reflections through a relational lens, Development Southern Africa, DOI:10.1080/0376835X.2014.984833 Corporate social responsibility, mining and sustainable development in Namibia: Critical reflections through a relational lens Dr David Littlewood Lecturer in Reputation and Responsibility, Henley Business School, Greenlands Campus, Henley-on-Thames, Oxfordshire, RG9 3AU, UK. Tel: +44 (0) 1491 414 559. Email: [email protected] For its advocates Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) represents a powerful tool through which business and particularly multinationals can play a more direct role in global sustainable development.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chamber of Mines of Namibia Annual Review
    Annual Review The Chamber of Mines of Namibia Table of Contents 4 Structure of the Chamber 6 Highlights of 2015 8 Foreword from the CEO 9 President’s Report for 2015 16 Mine Safety in 2015 19 Review of Operations 81 Exploration Companies 104 Mining and the Economy 110 Annex 1: Key Statistics 110 Output by Mine 112 Permanent Employment by Mine 114 Mining and the Economy 116 Tax Revenue 118 Annex 2: Chamber Members and Committees in 2015 122 References 124 Abbreviations 126 Notes Vision for the Mining Industry Vision for the Namibian Mining Industry is to be widely respected as a safe, environmentally responsible, globally competitive and meaningful contributor to the long term prosperity of Namibia. Vision for the Chamber To be acknowledged as the champion of the exploration and mining industry in Namibia. Mission To effectively promote, encourage, protect, foster and contribute to the growth of responsible exploration and mining in Namibia to the benefit of the country and all stakeholders. Core Values • Integrity • Transparency • Accountability • Compliance Page 3 Council of the Chamber of Mines K. Kapwanga (President) Sakawe Mining Corporation J. Coetzee H. Mbako (1st Vice President) (2nd Vice President) QKR Namibia AREVA Resources Namibia M. Dawe S. Solomons O. Shikongo Irvinne Simaata C. Aspeling W. Duvenhage B2Gold Namibia Langer Heinrich Namdeb Holdings Skorpion Zinc Rosh Pinah Zinc Rössing Uranium (Pty) Ltd Uranium (Pty) Ltd Limited Corporation (Pty) Corporation (Pty) Limited Ltd Ltd Zheng KePing A. Snyman C. Thomas W. Ewald D. Kullmann H. Schütte Swakop Uranium Salt & Chemicals Weatherly Mining Bannerman Mining Valencia Uranium OHORONGO (Pty) Ltd Namibia Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Scoping Report and Emp for Rosh Pinah Zinc Corporation's (Rpzc) Exploration Activities on Epl 2616
    SCOPING REPORT AND EMP FOR ROSH PINAH ZINC CORPORATION'S (RPZC) EXPLORATION ACTIVITIES ON EPL 2616 AMENDMENT OCTOBER 2019 Compiled for: Rosh Pinah Zinc Corporation Private Bag 2001 / Rosh Pinah Namibia Compiled by: A. Speiser Environmental Consultants cc PO Box 40386 Windhoek Namibia TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS .............................................................................................................................. 6 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 7 1.1 Reason for the amendment .......................................................................................... 7 1.2 Introduction to the existing exploration activities ........................................................... 8 1.2.1 History of EPL 2616 .............................................................................................. 8 1.3 Motivation for the exploration activities ......................................................................... 9 1.4 Introduction to the environmental impact assessment for the proposed exploration activities ....................................................................................................................... 9 1.4.1 EIA process for the proposed exploration activities on EPL 2616 ........................ 10 1.4.2 EIA Scoping process ........................................................................................... 11 1.4.3 EIA team ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM for the Year Ended December 31, 2020
    ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM For the year ended December 31, 2020 March 31, 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE NO. PRELIMINARY NOTES .................................................................................................................. 2 CORPORATE STRUCTURE .......................................................................................................... 6 DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS ........................................................................................... 7 DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS ............................................................................................ 12 MINERAL PROPERTIES ............................................................................................................ 222 RISK FACTORS ......................................................................................................................... 501 DIVIDENDS ................................................................................................................................... 69 DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE ................................................................................ 69 MARKET FOR SECURITIES ........................................................................................................ 70 DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS ..................................................................................................... 70 LEGAL PROCEEDINGS AND REGULATORY ACTIONS .......................................................... 79 INTEREST OF MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS IN MATERIAL
    [Show full text]