This Exhibit Was Replaced by the Exhibit Above
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Miki Basin Industrial Park Environmental Assessment Exhibit A Archaeological Inventory Survey Archaeological Data Recovery Plan And Archaeological Data Recovery Report (Including Cultural Impact Analysis) September 24, 2019 Kurt Matsumoto, COO Pulama Lāna‘i 733 Bishop Street Suite 2000 Honolulu, HI 96813 Re: Archaeological Inventory Survey for the Miki Basin 200 Acre Industrial Development TMK (2) 4-9-002:061 (portion) Dye, DiVito and Maly (May 9, 2018) Mr. Matsumoto: This letter confirms that, although not titled as such, the Archaeological Inventory Survey cited above included research compliant with guidelines for development of a cultural impact assessment study (CIA), required by the Hawai‘i Supreme Court’s holding in Ka Paakai O Ka Aina v. Land Use Commission, State of Hawai‘i, 7 P.3d 1068, 94 Hawai‘i 31 (2000). The study includes descriptions of traditional knowledge of place, and traditional and customary practices as documented in Hawaiian language accounts from Lāna‘i. There also cited important historical accounts penned by foreign residents and visitors, documenting the changes in land use, access and residency from the 1840s to the 1950s. As a result of the rapid decline of the native Hawaiian population on Lāna‘i, and early control of nearly all the land on the island by non-native business interests, little documentation pertaining to the extent to which traditional and customary native Hawaiian rights might be exercised in the petition area survived the passing of time. No native tenant kuleana (property rights) or Royal Patent Grants were issued for lands within the petition area. By the 1870s control of the petition area lands was held under one individual, who also posted notices advising against trespass. By the 1920s, the entire area was dedicated to cultivation of pineapple (see Figure 1). Through the 1930s, the petition area included a residential field camp for Japanese employees of the plantation and their families. Cultivation of pineapple and maintenance of support infrastructure such as road ways, water lines and stockpile sites was the only land use in the area until the close of the plantation in 1992. The Petition Area was completely cleared and cultivated in pineapple for nearly 70 years. The land was bulldozed, plowed, graded, and planted with pineapples multiple times during that period. Because of the heavy use of pesticides and growth hormones, it would have been highly unlikely that plants of medicinal or other cultural uses would have been gathered across these fields. Since the close of the pineapple plantation in 1992, a few native plant species have volunteered across the nearly 20,000 acres of former pineapple fields. Most notable are the indigenous ‘a‘ali‘i (Dodonaea viscosa), ‘ilima (Sida fallax), naio (Myoporum sandwicense), and the ‘uhaloa (Waltheria indica). While each of the plants have cultural value and uses, none are rare, and all grow throughout the Pālāwai-Miki Region of Lāna‘i. September 25, 2019 Mr. KurtKurt Matsumoto (Page 2.) 1 , : L, ^ -V"7 j-J#"' O **r .u HHHl notr ss® * X I*v m *U . p* -3 * 1 ft. 5?s i/ m -Mi Figure 1. Pineapple Field Harvest in Miki Basin Fields -– Miki Camp in Background (left). HAPCo Photo No. 525, August 31, 19281928 (Lāna‘i(Lana'i Culture & HeritageHeritage Center Collection). There was no evidence of any protected cultural practices occurring on the site. Therefore, the project will not have any significant negative impact on traditional and customary practices. Should you have any further questions, please let me know. ‘O'O wau no me ka ha‘aha‘a,ha'aha'a, KepāKepa Maly P.P.O.O. Box 631500 Lāna‘iLana'i City, Hawai‘iHawai'i 96720 T. S. Dye & Colleagues, Archaeologists, Inc. į2.3 "?įoĔFįįįLand Tenure įįį\į Xį Lįįį4į 9į į \į&įįįį*įĜįįįįįįį:į į0į0įįįįįįįįįįĝį į37 į 735 Bishop St., Suite 315, Honolulu, Hnwai'i 96813 ]1į2.3.1 >3AõzįMahele Ñßį('Aina Statistics} ď Đ įį"3 Z į8Kon Lana'i K/ 00¡$Ğį37 į į2.3.2 QyPlace íįP į,÷.tįC{įNames Referenced in Claims +Dçį@)įN z įby Applicants įįįįįį¢į £įį;įįįį38 į i¤Éį2.33 k BUį-įÐuH H [ įñįDisposition of Ahupua'a and ÖýįKonohikl Claims +# įį"3àğÄįon Lana'i įįįįįįįįį38 į i^Êį2.3.4 =ÿįBuke >3A#įMahele ×?įk ę į=Rį(Land Division Book), 12į1848 K. $!!YYį38 į #Archaeological ! "# ! "## ##Inventory Survey for the Miki 2.3.5į NE Cį?įP VJįoSįAlii and Native Tenant Claims+#æį įį¥įį¦įį_į%įįįįį`įįĠį 'įįįį/į/įįįįį2Ãį.... 40 Ç<į2.3.6 n# # į(Palapala Sila~D įÙ~įNui, 1855-1867:hgÎį,ć)qEįn įRoyal Patent OFįGrant " įį"r įLands on Lana'i 5į... 45 6 į ## # Basin 200 Acre Industrial # ! #Development 2.3.7į =IċįBoundary ÒĄ įCommission (Ė)į Sįp Uă7į&&8ġįSurveys and Testimonies 47 6į 2.46į ,éüĆįÛ G T įRanching Operations įlron Lana'i, į161Íhį1854-1951 <!%Ģ§aMį....... 65 į Lands of Kalulu and Kaunolu, Lahaina District, Lana'i island %(,&, *!*,$,*%&"+,%,()'),%,(#%, 2.5įQĀ #į+ Ěįįį ÔáWqC7 įHawaiian Pineapple Companyį %įįģį įį$į'įįįį¨įįįį įį į]į įį%į©įįªįįįį68 į TMK: (2) 4-9-002:061 4 , , , 2.6į N.AâArchaeologicalE7î Dį= RFĈI{įBackground įįbįįįį. `į 5į..........«į&į¬į įįįįį!įcį cįį®į¯į _į%įįįį Kįį9į °įfį70 &ËÅį2.6.1 ÓĊ)į(ĕ.Ęò)įEmory Survey&į&įį9į!įį±į ²į/į'įį$įLįįįį0įį³įį į dį į 5į5įįįįįįįį´įįįįfį70 "&Nathan J. !&DiVito & #&Kepa Maly Thomas && %& &S. Dye, PhD µÈį2.6.2 l įLate pWđ}wTwentieth-Century+HF)įÕąJóB V įInvestigations į!į'įį8įį:įįį¶į0įįį*į·į įįXį 4įįį72 ¸%į2.6.3 Cultural +ID IG yį, HGįm öįResources Management (ē7 įStudies į¹įį8įºį 4įįįįįįį*į į įįįįįį72 $&&&May 9, 2018 3 4!+3>Methods >75 >4 #%>38&53>Field Results >76 âĒūŭţĀĔŮƠAbstract 5 8()2>Summary *>and ,*&83#+*3>Conclusions 96 ã ƠBƠAt the Ţ¥ ƠPƠrequest of ó§WƠPulama ÿœ¯³ƠlAna'i, ùlƠôÀƠT. S. u!NƠ®ƠçDye & Colleagues,"Ķ GƠäĜ?UA* Archaeologists ƠhasƠ),ƖƠcon -2 ƠĉƠducted an Đ)%"Ŋ,R 2}Ơ Əarchaeological inventory^!ƠƎ !Ơsurvey d ƠƆ-į;Ơwith subsurface testingƀAƠij^ƠLƠïƠfor the Miki t ƠBasin >A 6.6#Stratigraphic /-"#> +*7;63>Contexts 97 n'6Ơ200 sĝLƠAcre I¦¤ "CƠIndustrial v?. ? ƠŖ; ? ƠDevelopment located Ơ%Ơin the landsCčƠ,ƠxąƉC-Ơof Kalulu ~ƠxƌŋƇgƠand Kaunolu, y|ķĈƠLahaina uŀƃ gƠy|°SƠDistrict, Lana'i IĊÁƠü ƠIsland. The survey-!ƠFKcL$ƠDƠ#Ơ@4ƠƠŤ evaluated the parcel for the presenceĕƠ_Ơ2Ơor absence >B #&>Field 6',Catalog > 98 X@ƠůX&S<Ơ3&Y3&Ơof historic properties Ơand #cƍĆƠcultural Ŏ:£&9CƠńƠmaterials in cŠ3ŗ&ƠXQƠJƠƕŘŕRƠsupport of a zoning <ċRƠDƠE%Ơchange to the C Artifact List 98 `Ň =ŰƠ`"ÂƠproject area. > .4#4>$36> ñ Pedestrian `T9Ơ¥ģ!Ơsurvey &-ű ƠTƠresulted in b%Ơthe ı=ŷƠidentification Ơand ř)-WŲ1ƠQƠ1Ơ MĖ1VƔƠdocumentation of a secondarily Glossary 101 3deposited * ĤƠ% 4#Ơ95 Į9=DƠ;JŶ5GƠƠ #5ŌeƠ$historic artifact scatter, a secondarily deposited D Ơýlithic)ƠŬ;"£GƠscatter, Ơ:Ơand an %,331=> > B Ś^Ơhistoric ƅ´Ơproperty, >MAƠdesignated õŁMƠH7·Ù7¿08hm0q7jƠSite 50-40-98-1980. ú Ơė.Test excavationsŸ, Ơ*ěV§ Ơ{Ơincluded a VƠtotal :##*>Hawaiian 0(3>Terms >102 Y@ƠÖÌƠē<ZƠƁ<ĥµƠZőƠZPƠdĺ=ĸƠ! ƠJƠof 31 backhoe trenches, one of which yielded a IJ¸* ƠQƄĦ¶Ơfire-pit feature, ť#Y4>>Ơ Ơö*Ơrecorded as Site H'50-40-98¹Ú'º0q»Ír8mËƠ1981. .9#4#,*3>Abbreviations >106 åBƠBoth bŪĘƠhistoric 3Ź Ơproperties "5ħƠare UʼneƠ Ơ±Ğā ĨƠlikely to date ,Ơto BƠƂK ź1Ơwdthe traditional Hawaiian Ơ >Ơperiod $Ơ:ƐƠƠand have been .ƈ¡ğƠƠ TAŔ#"Ơevaluated as significant @Ơfor ƠWųČ¡ƠņżƠ,ƠwƒKSƠthe important information on Hawaiian #&#+Bibliography 1-"<> >106 Ļ Ơhistory $Ơ_īand prehistory EƠEƠNªƠ1.Ơthat they have !*ĬĠ$Ơś_Ơ:4NƠłªƠEŜƠ! yielded or are likely to yield.$jƠz%ƠThe ðƠt ƠMild Basin n6'Ơs2 ƠI ¦¤}Ơv. Uŏ ƠƓƠ%200 Acre Industrial Development will have{F ƠĎƠ Fĩ Ơ İ ębƠƠƠPƠƠĹ)Ơan adverse effect on both of these historic 4ŻƠ~ ƠƠ 2properties and data recoveryF eƠ). excavations ƠđƠ5#ŝŐĪ$Ơş&Ơ÷ Ơare recommended for Sites Ü'ip'¼08iÎà86Ơ50-40-98-1980 Figures ġƠH7hp6and 50-40½98-1981.0Þ¾ÏrßÓlƠ 1į1 Q.āTį# Ēįsį Gëěįêïu #ùC#įBėV įProject location and nearby archaeological investigations Ĥ.......įįįįįĥįįįįį%į»į4 6į Contents 2į Ïûĉãäį-į"è Z įįAhupua'a of LSna'i įeį$įįįį&įįįįįįįįį5įMįįĦįįħįįį Ĩį*įįĩįXį 4į$įįįįįį6 į 3į .įÚ Jį,ú ČNative Register, page įgį1 į¼įį^įįdįį*įįį įįįįįįįįįįįįį 'įįįį4į$įįįįįį21į41 ÐƠ ê¢Ŧ[ ¨¢ļ[ƠIntroduction ×Ơ3 42į P JôįNative ,B.į įįRegister, page 2 įįįeį!įįĪį įįįįMį%į½įįįįįįįį'į/įį į:į :į Lįįįįį9į!į 422į Üį5 , |tį> įRegistered Map 2227 į $*ī;į 46 2Ìį 2 Background 4 ÔƠ æĂňĵŧ[¨Œ Ơ ÛƠ 6į (Rvį į-įSketch map of "3å įì)įÝbįm¾įO @ įįįLana'i by W. M. Gibson .../įįĬįaįĭį;įįįįįįįįįįįYįį įįį¿įįÀ į 56 5 oÃÑƠ2.1 ø\OƠzŨ(ĢŽ\+aƠĴƠSome Traditions from î(fĽƠ]ĭƠLana'i of ë(ƊƋăf(©ƠKaulula'au ÄƠ ƗƠ ƘƠ «Ơ «Ơ ¬Ơ ÅƠ ÆƠ ÇƠ ÈƠ ƙƠ ƚƠ ¬Ơ ƛƠ ƜƠ ƝƠ Ơ kƠ Ơ kƠ/ƠƞƠ ÝƠ į7 (xðAį į Uįs7Sketch map depicting disposition į-įE? į-į"3S [ įof lands of Lana'i @)įÞ!į>įO @ įby W. M. Gibson įįį<į<į59 jį 2.2 Historical Events: Transitions in Land Use and Population on Lana'i 31 oÉÕƠ é Ŵ]ŃĚćƠèƑO+ŵáƠûũ(+ľž]+aƠŅƠìƠþaOƠƠò\š©ōĄſŞ+Ơ+Ơíď(²ĿƠ Ɵ/Ê///ƠØÒƠ į8 (xvįSketch įmap of-įØįMDd Camp + į įįįįįįį įįįįįįįįįįį;įįįį įįįįįį*įį'įįÆį71 '&)/'/'Prepared for -"#/Pulama Una'i, / /1311 *(/Fraser .$,//%/ /!/+// /Avenue, P.O. Box 630310, Una'i City, HI 96763. 9jį " Tþį-įø įW ĎįLocation of finds within thew į .Ăčį| į8įįproject area į/į$įÁįį'įįįįįÂįįįįįįįįĮįįįį 77 2 ÄŔ10 -qĥŔ ŔArtifacts collected hŔfrom Ŕ. õ¡FŔthe Context Ŕ19 ĒġŔ4 Ŕlithic scatter 8!!//!9Ŕ,Ŕ 78 7I20CQ NAD'aiimi 4N 1ÇŔ11 ?i ŔŔPhotograph of Ŕthe .