Thesis Submitted to the Department of Law of the London School of Economics and Political Science for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, September 2017

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Thesis Submitted to the Department of Law of the London School of Economics and Political Science for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, September 2017 The London School of Economics and Political Science Law Embodied: re-imagining a material legal normativity Sally Shinan Zhu A thesis submitted to the Department of Law of the London School of Economics and Political Science for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, September 2017 !1 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 98,052 words. !2 Abstract In this thesis I critique the modern tendency to construct the legal subject upon a sharp distinction between Reason and body and to ground the normative force of law on an ideal conception of Reason. The legal subject is thereby presented as a disembodied cogitans to the neglect of his corporeality. This disregards both the necessarily material aspect of the legal subject and the necessarily embodied aspect of legal action, and results in an inadequate account of how legal normativity is manifested in material reality. This thesis aims to construct a theory of material legal normativity by re-incorporating the body of the subject into legal action and presenting that as the proper locus of law’s normative force. Although I focus on the material body in favour of Reason or rationality as the locus of action, I do not dismiss the possibility of meaningful normative action which is free from determination by material forces. I aim to construct a theory of action which is both material and normative by navigating the opposition between ideal Reason and material determinism. I do this by proposing an alternative conception of normative action which draws together the mechanism of habit and the manner of interaction with the material world. This theory of normative action will then form the basis for an account of normative legal action which gives due weight to the embodied nature of the legal subject as the proper locus for the material manifestation of the normative force of law. !3 Contents Introduction 5 1. Role of Reason 9 2. Foucault and Subjectivity 44 3. Counterintuitive Features 67 4. Re-imagining Materiality 92 5. Habit and Action 128 6. Normative Action 163 7. Legal Normativity 201 Conclusion 227 Bibliography 230 !4 Introduction Law is a ubiquitous presence in modern liberal societies; it towers in the grand buildings of government and courts of justice, omnipotent institutions of power whose agents of authority roam the civilian space as a constant visible reminder of law’s might. But law’s other, less visible face is more insidiously inserted into every crevice of society; in the humdrum motions of buying living necessities, going through reams of bills and registration forms, designating drivers for social nights-out. Law is an ineluctable aspect of modern living, so influences the very foundations of action for its legal subjects, however its own foundations of power and validity are arguably less accessible than its surface phenomena. The normativity of law1 has been a source of philosophical inquiry for likely as long as the phenomena has existed; copious theories of law have been produced, ranging from law as divine inspiration,2 to law as oppressive ideology,3 and all the while law continued to be uneventfully and relentlessly legislated, enforced, and obeyed. My project as I wade into this debate is centred around my dissatisfaction with one dominant theme in jurisprudence; the tendency to ground law's normativity in some immaterial notion of Reason or cogito, and to dismiss the corporeal shell they are encased within. The subject of legal normativity is posited as a being whose faculty for Reason and rationality enables the norms of law to find purchase, and through the mind to dictate the movements of the body. This categorical attachment of legal normativity to the cogito aspect of the mind/body dualism is reiterated in varying forms throughout modern jurisprudence: law is a rational or moral reason for action; a coordination of joint social planning; a standard of impartial justice. The normative justifications for law are equally so: law is a necessary moral or natural state for human flourishing; a form of ideal public discourse; a narrative towards achieving nomos; a product of autonomous consensus. These prominent theories all appear to premise a 1 I use the term normativity to refer to that aspect of ‘ought’ which distinguishes prescriptive norms from descriptions of fact. Although I do not subscribe to the Is/Ought dualism, I do believe there is a judgement or attitude attached to norms which is often expressed in value terms, such as ‘should’, or ‘right’. 2 Theological law, i.e. Thomas Aquinas; R.J. Henle, Saint Thomas Aquinas, the Treatise on Law : [being Summa Theologiae, I-II; QQ. 90 through 97]. Notre Dame Studies in Law and Contemporary Issues ; v. 4. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1993. 3 Various strains of Marxism, i.e. Antonio Gramsci; Joseph Femia, Gramsci's Political Thought : Hegemony, Consciousness, and the Revolutionary Process. Oxford ; New York: Clarendon Press ; OUP, 1981. !5 legal society consisting of rational and autonomous agents whose actions are dictated by the combined forces of legal norms and rational will. The law is fundamentally a rational system of rules, their validity is assured by the subject’s receptiveness to rational reasons and arguments, and their efficacy is enforced by the subject’s capacity for free autonomous action. Throughout this discourse the body is sidelined as a vessel for the mind, a contumely object for regulation whose sensible impulses necessitate that law is reinforced through coercion. Legal normativity is imposed upon the body; it is not derived from or conditioned by the body. I feel an intuitive rebellion against an approach which effaces the irrevocable and, I would argue, primary mode of human existence, that of embodied action and being in the world. The body that enables sensory experience, motility, consciousness, is the conduit through which the material world is made accessible. Surely such a mechanism must condition to some extent the phenomena produced through its own motions. For me it is highly doubtful that law as foremost a social construct can establish its normative foundations independent of material reality, or that legal action can be determined beyond the influence of its embodiment in the corporeal legal subject. Hence my primary aim in this thesis is to redress this perceived lack of materiality and embodiment in normative legal theory, by constructing legal normativity from the body of the legal subject as an active being in the world. This also implicates the necessity of advancing an account of action which departs from traditional models of physical movement determined by rational deliberation. Although large parts of my thesis will be concerned with the philosophical structure of normative action, it is not my intention to analyse the concept of action, its internal mechanisms or its conditions of possibility. Instead I take a largely descriptive approach to notions such as voluntary, cognitive action, and activity, without positing any particular theoretical basis for their possibility. The materiality I am concerned with is not limited to the body of the legal subject, but includes the wider material conditions of his existence, such as social and economic institutions. Neither is it my intention to analyse law as a concept with essential components or features that mutually interlock into a neat system which contains the conditions of its normativity. I take law as an open-textured social construct without conceptually necessary features; a haphazard construction which exhibits contingent commonality across empirical examples as a result of commonalities in action as opposed to common principles. My project consists in combining action and law into material legal action, which necessarily !6 implicates a certain theoretical approach to action. For this I draw upon a combination of phenomenology4 and pragmatist5 philosophical traditions, the former for its dialectical synthesis of body and mind, the latter for its emphasis on external reality as the vector for practical action. The aim is to present legal normativity as material action which is conditioned by law presented as structures of material reality; hence it is neither entirely a theory of legal action, nor a theory of law as concept, but an inquiry into the constitutions and conditions of how legal normativity is borne into materiality through action. Pursuing my critique of grounding legal normativity in Reason, I examine the theories of Thomas Hobbes and Immanuel Kant as prominent representatives of a philosophical tradition which exerts significant influence on modern jurisprudence. I outline their arguments for law as a necessary part of a political common-wealth, built upon an absolute sovereign authority, all justified through ideal Reason, and offer my contentions for what I perceive to be problematic or insupportable. I then examine the theory of Karl Marx and his materialist approach as a philosophical foil, again focussing on his arguments of the politico-economic conditions of law, informed by his conceptions of human nature and consciousness.6 Although a materialist approach is preferable to idealism, Marxian theory exhibits a tendency towards economic determinism which I do not find compatible with normativity.
Recommended publications
  • Philosophy Edited by Sacha Golob , Jens Timmermann Frontmatter More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-03305-4 — The Cambridge History of Moral Philosophy Edited by Sacha Golob , Jens Timmermann Frontmatter More Information the cambridge history of moral PHILOSOPHY With fifty-four chapters charting the development of moral philosophy in the Western world, this volume examines the key thinkers and texts and their influence on the history of moral thought from the pre-Socratics to the present day. Topics including Epicureanism, humanism, Jewish and Arabic thought, perfectionism, pragmatism, idealism and intuitionism are all explored, as are figures including Aristotle, Boethius, Spinoza, Hobbes, Hume, Kant, Hegel, Mill, Nietzsche, Heidegger, Sartre and Rawls, as well as numerous key ideas and schools of thought. Chapters are written by leading experts in the field, drawing on the latest research to offer rigorous analysis of the canonical figures and movements of this branch of philosophy. The volume provides a comprehensive yet philosophically advanced resource for students and teachers alike as they approach, and refine their understanding of, the central issues in moral thought. sacha golob is a Senior Lecturer in Philosophy and the Director of the Centre for Philosophy and the Visual Arts at King’s College London. He is the author of Heidegger on Concepts, Freedom and Normativity (Cambridge 2014), and of articles on the histories of French and German philosophy and the philosophy of mind. jens timmermann is Professor of Moral Philosophy at the University of St Andrews. He is the co-editor of Kant’s ‘Critique of Practical Reason’: A Critical Guide (Cambridge 2010) and of Immanuel Kant: Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (Cambridge 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • [email protected]) King’S College London, Strand, London, WC2R 2LS
    Sacha Golob ([email protected]) King’s College London, Strand, London, WC2R 2LS Sacha Yevgeny Golob Curriculum Vitae Contents Personal Details............................................................................................................. 2 Areas of Specialization .................................................................................................. 2 Areas of Competence ..................................................................................................... 2 Publications (All Peer Reviewed, All Sole Author Unless Otherwise Stated) ............... 2 Monographs ............................................................................................................... 2 Edited Collections ...................................................................................................... 2 Journal Articles .......................................................................................................... 2 Chapters in Edited Collections................................................................................... 3 Encyclopaedia Entries ................................................................................................ 4 Extended Critical Essays, Responses and Book Reviews ......................................... 4 Employment History....................................................................................................... 4 Education ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Subjectivity, Reflection and Freedom in Later Foucault
    International Journal of Philosophical Studies ISSN: 0967-2559 (Print) 1466-4542 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/riph20 Subjectivity, Reflection and Freedom in Later Foucault Sacha Golob To cite this article: Sacha Golob (2015) Subjectivity, Reflection and Freedom in Later Foucault, International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 23:5, 666-688, DOI: 10.1080/09672559.2015.1091029 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2015.1091029 Published online: 30 Sep 2015. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 91 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=riph20 Download by: [Kings College London] Date: 02 December 2015, At: 11:10 International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 2015 Vol. 23, No. 5, 666–688, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2015.1091029 Subjectivity, Reflection and Freedom in Later Foucault Sacha Golob Abstract This paper proposes a new reading of the interaction between subjectivity, reflection and freedom within Foucault’s later work. I begin by introducing three approaches to subjectivity, locating these in relation both to Foucault’s texts and to the recent litera- ture. I suggest that Foucault himself operates within what I call the ‘entanglement approach’, and, as such, he faces a potentially serious challenge, a challenge force- fully articulated by Han. Using Kant’streatmentofreflection as a point of compar- ison, I argue that Foucault possesses the resources to meet this challenge. The key, I contend, is to distinguish two related theses about reflection and freedom: Foucault’s position is distinctive precisely because he accepts one of these theses whilst rejecting the other.
    [Show full text]
  • HPS: Seminar Programme
    Seminars Departmental Seminars Seminars are held on Thursdays from 4.30 to 6.00pm in Seminar Room 2, Department of History and Philosophy of Science, Free School Lane, Cambridge. There is tea beforehand from 4pm in Seminar Room 1. Organised by Alex Broadbent. 22 April Mark Parascandola (National Institutes of Health, USA) Epistemic risk and public health science 29 April Harry Collins (Cardiff University) Justice and automated match officiating 6 May Vanessa Heggie (HPS, Cambridge) Respiratory physiology, experiment and Everest, from ghastly kitchens to gasping lungs 13 May Katherine Angel (University of Warwick) Writing post-feminist history: female sexual dysfunction and biological psychiatry, 1960 to the present 27 May Fifteenth Annual Hans Rausing Lecture (McCrum Lecture Theatre) Myles W. Jackson (Polytechnic Institute of New York University and the Gallatin School of NYU) From scientific instruments to musical instruments: the tuning fork, metronome and siren Fri 28 May Myles W. Jackson (Polytechnic Institute of New York University and the Gallatin School of NYU) The CCR5 gene patent: biomedicine, intellectual property and commerce in the United States Seminar Programmes are sent out at the start of every term to the names on our mailing list. Please contact the Department if you would like to be added to or removed from the mailing list, or if you change your address. Seminar information is also available at www.hps.cam.ac.uk/seminars Details of the Department’s programme of graduate training workshops – for graduate students and postdoctoral researchers – are available at www.hps.cam.ac.uk/students/training and in the Graduate Handbook.
    [Show full text]
  • Universe and Inner Self in Early Indian and Early Greek Thought
    UNIVERSE AND INNER SELF IN EARLY INDIAN INDIAN AND INNER SELF IN EARLY UNIVERSE ‘The philosophical traditions of Greece and India are divergent but also GREEK THOUGHT AND EARLY show striking convergences. This book is an important and valuable contribution to the comparative study of the two ancient cultures. The various chapters are learned and sophisticated and considerably enrich our understanding of Greek and Indian philosophy.’ Phiroze Vasunia, University College London How can we explain the remarkable similarities between early Indian and early Greek philosophy? UNIVERSE AND Around the middle of the first millennium BCE there occurred a revolution in thought, with novel ideas such as that understanding the inner self is both vital for human well-being and central to understanding INNER SELF the universe. This intellectual transformation is sometimes called the beginning of philosophy. The revolution occurred in both India and Greece, but not in the vast Persian Empire that divided them. How was IN EARLY INDIAN this possible? This is a puzzle that has never been solved. This volume brings together Hellenists and Indologists representing AND EARLY GREEK a variety of perspectives on the similarities and differences between the two cultures, and on how to explain them. It offers a collaborative Richard Seaford Richard THOUGHT contribution to the burgeoning interest in the Axial Age, and is of interest to those intrigued by the big questions inspired by the ancient world. by Edited Richard Seaford is Emeritus Professor of Ancient Greek at the University of Exeter. Cover images: Detail from The School of Athens, 1511, Raffaello Sanzio da Urbino, Wikimedia Commons.
    [Show full text]
  • Steven Galt Crowell Curriculum Vitae
    1 CURRICULUM VITAE STEVEN GALT CROWELL Professor of Philosophy Joseph and Joanna Nazro Mullen Professor of Humanities https://philosophy.rice.edu/people/faculty/steven-crowell Department of Philosophy (MS 14) 5324 Institute Lane Rice University Houston, Texas 77005 6100 Main Street 713-530-9513 Houston, Texas 77005 713-348-2719 fax 713-348-5847 [email protected] EDUCATION Ph.D. Yale University (1981) M.A. Northern Illinois University (1976) A.B. University of California, Santa Cruz (1974, summa cum laude) FIELDS Twentieth century European philosophy, esp. phenomenology; Nietzsche; Kant and German Idealism; metaphysics, philosophy of mind, aesthetics, philosophy of history ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS 2013- Affiliate Faculty, Department of Religion 2003- Joseph and Joanna Nazro Mullen Professor of Humanities 1999-06: Professor of German and Slavic Studies (temporary joint appointment) 1998- Professor of Philosophy, Rice University 1997-98: Wexler Visiting Professor, Bryn Mawr College 1988-97: Associate Professor, Rice University 1983-88: Assistant Professor, Rice University 1982-83: Visiting Assistant Professor, Fordham University 1980-82: Instructor, Yale University SELECTED PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES 2 Co-Editor (with Sonja Rinofner-Kreidl [Graz]), Husserl Studies (Vol. 24/2008 - Vol. ) Founding Editor (with Burt Hopkins), New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy Executive Co-Director, Society for Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (2001-2004) Executive Committee, Society for Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Heidegger and the Occlusion of the Political by SACHA GOLOB
    Heidegger and The Occlusion of the Political By SACHA GOLOB (King’s College London) Forthcoming in Geschichte, Politik, Ideologie: Heideggers ,Schwarze Hefte‘ im Kontext, Espinet, Figal, Keiling and Mirkovic (eds.), Mohr Siebeck. Penultimate Draft – Please Cite the Published Version Abstract This paper aims to advance our understanding of Heidegger’s politics as it is laid bare within the ‘Schwarze Hefte’. Yet my interest is not in Heidegger’s first order political views, but rather in his conception of the political sphere per se. Beginning from a close analysis of the earliest volume of the notebooks, Gesamtausgabe Bd.94, I suggest that the dominant characterisation of the political space within Heidegger’s text is as a threat - to philosophy and to ontology. Underlying that characterisation, however, it is simultaneously possible to identify another pattern, one on which the political is itself gradually suppressed or occluded by the ontological. This tacit occlusion has, I suggest, a number of deeply problematic consequences. I close by indicating how the argument might be extended to the question of a Heideggerian ethics. 1 My aim in this paper is to advance our understanding of Heidegger’s politics as it is laid bare within the so-called ‘Schwarze Hefte’. But my interest is not in his first order political views nor in his prejudices, which seem to me as predictable as they are repulsive. Rather, my interest is in his conception of the political sphere per se, and in his understanding of the relationship between philosophy and politics as two fields of discourse or action. I want to approach the topic with the help of a figure that is, I hope, useful, although provocative.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Todd Gifford
    CURRICULUM VITAE TODD GIFFORD MAY Dept. of Philosophy and Religion 224 Hardin Hall Clemson University Clemson, SC 29634 864-656-2584 (o) Education Ph.D. The Pennsylvania State University, 1989. Philosophy Dissertation: Psychology, Knowledge, Politics: The Epistemic Grounds of Michel Foucault's Genealogy of Psychology M.A. Duquesne University, 1982. Psychology B.A. Brown University, 1978 Areas of Specialization Twentieth Century Continental Philosophy: Phenomenology, Existentialism, Structuralism, Poststructuralism Political Philosophy Ethics and Metaethics Areas of Competence Philosophy of Language, Epistemology, History of Philosophy Academic Positions Class of 1941 Professor of the Humanities, 2009-Present Kathryn and Calhoun Lemon Professor of Philosophy, 2007- 2009 Professor, Clemson University, 1998-2007 Associate Professor, Clemson University, 1994-1998 Assistant Professor, Clemson University, 1991-1994 2 Visiting Assistant Professor, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, 1989-1991 Graduate Instructor, The Pennsylvania State University, 1987 Publications Books: A Decent Life: Morality for the Rest of Us, University Of Chicago Press, forthcoming 2019 A Fragile Life: Accepting Our Vulnerability, University of Chicago Press, 2017 --Korean translation, Dolbegae Publishers, forthcoming Nonviolent Resistance: A Philosophical Introduction, Polity Press, 2015 --Turkish translation, 2016, Ayrinti Yayinlari A Significant Life: Human Meaning in a Silent Universe, University of Chicago Press, 2015 --Vietnamese translation, Taodanbooks, forthcoming
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 12. CV's
    Appendix 12: CVs Film, Media and Communication Film, Media and Communication CVs from postdocs, assistant professors, associate professors and professors Content: Taina Bucher Christa Lykke Christensen Sarah Davies Andreas Gregersen Lennard Højbjerg Hansen Katherine Harrison Rasmus Helles Stig Hjarvard Mette Hjort Maja Horst Klaus Bruhn Jensen Anne Jerslev Eva Jørholt Maja Klausen Nete Nørgaard Kristensen Birger Langkjær Jun Liu Stine Lomborg Mette Mortensen Eva Novrup Redvall Johannes Riis Anne Schepelern Kjetil Sandvik Miklos Sukosd Henrik Søndergaard Anne Mette Thorhauge Hans-Jörg Trenz Casper Tybjerg Jacob Ørmen Appendix 12: CVs Film, Media and Communication Name: Position and academic title(s): Associate Professor Taina Bucher Department: Employed at UCPH/dep artment since: August Media, Cognition and Communication 2013 Disciplinary affiliation(s): Year of PhD graduation: 2012 Media, Communication and IT 1. Brief introduction to research profile and current research focus My work focuses broadly on the social and cultural implications of digital infrastructure, and I’m particularly interested in the power and politics of algorithms in everyday life. Firmly grounded in media studies, my research focuses on the social, cultural and political ramifications of software and computation. Broadly speaking, I am interested in different forms of computational culture, and ways in which software mediates and intervenes in communicative and social contexts. More specifically, I am interested in the impacts of algorithms, big data and analytics on the media and cultural industries, including journalism and social media platforms. My work combines social scientific and humanities methods with a strong focus on qualitative investigations and critical theoretical analysis. My current research sees algorithms as a social concern, and investigates how they come to matter as part of people’s online experiences, public discourse and work life.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE TODD GIFFORD MAY Dept. of Philosophy
    CURRICULUM VITAE TODD GIFFORD MAY Dept. of Philosophy and Religion 206 Hardin Hall Clemson University Clemson, SC 29634 864-656-2584 (o) Education Ph.D. The Pennsylvania State University, 1989. Philosophy Dissertation: Psychology, Knowledge, Politics: The Epistemic Grounds of Michel Foucault's Genealogy of Psychology M.A. Duquesne University, 1982. Psychology B.A. Brown University, 1978 Areas of Specialization Ethics and Political Philosophy Twentieth Century Continental Philosophy: Phenomenology, Existentialism, Structuralism, Poststructuralism Areas of Competence Philosophy of Language, Epistemology, History of Philosophy Academic Positions Class of 1941 Professor of the Humanities, 2009-Present Kathryn and Calhoun Lemon Professor of Philosophy, 2007- 2009 Professor, Clemson University, 1998-2007 Associate Professor, Clemson University, 1994-1998 Assistant Professor, Clemson University, 1991-1994 Visiting Assistant Professor, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, 1989-1991 Graduate Instructor, The Pennsylvania State University, 1987 Publications 2 Books: Philosophical Filmmakers: Kenneth Lonergan, Bloomsbury, February 2020 A Decent Life: Morality for the Rest of Us, University Of Chicago Press, 2019 --Chinese translation, forthcoming, Renmin University Press A Fragile Life: Accepting Our Vulnerability, University of Chicago Press, 2017 --Korean translation, 2018, Dolbegae Publishers Nonviolent Resistance: A Philosophical Introduction, Polity Press, 2015 --Turkish translation, 2016, Ayrinti Yayinlari A Significant Life: Human Meaning in
    [Show full text]
  • Methodological Anxiety Heidegger on Moods and Emotions
    OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 05/04/2017, SPi View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by PhilPapers 12 Methodological Anxiety Heidegger on Moods and Emotions Sacha Golob In the context of a history of the emotions, Martin Heidegger presents an important and challenging case. Emotions, broadly construed, play a central role in his think- ing; particularly boredom, fear, and anxiety.1 This role is, however, highly distinctive: Heidegger is critical of much of the standard ontology of emotions and he is uninterested in many of the philosophical debates within which emotions usually figure. My purpose in this article is to sketch these aspects of Heidegger’s work, highlighting both the innovative nature of his views and the distinctive problems he faces as a consequence. Before getting underway, two preliminary remarks. The first concerns the scope of this chapter. Heidegger was a prolific writer: the Gesamtausgabe edition runs to over one hundred volumes. Furthermore, during the course of his lifetime, his work undergoes a series of complex stylistic and philosophical shifts—for example, during the early 1930s, and then again in the aftermath of the war. There is no scholarly consensus on the exact nature of these developments or on the degree of continuity or change that they imply. Given these facts, it would be impossible to address Heidegger’s views on ‘emotions’ or indeed any other topic in a single chapter without radically restricting the chronological range of the discussion. I will therefore focus on Heidegger’s best-known work, Sein und Zeit (1927), and on the account developed there and then refined in subsequent texts such as Ga29/30, the 1929 lecture series Die Grundbegriffe der Metaphysik.
    [Show full text]
  • King's Research Portal
    King’s Research Portal Document Version Peer reviewed version Link to publication record in King's Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Golob, A. (2018). Heidegger and The Occlusion of the Political. In G. Figal, N. Mirkovic, D. Espinet, & T. Keiling (Eds.), Geschichte, Politik, Ideologie. Heideggers ,Schwarze Hefte‘ im Kontext (pp. 137-154). Mohr Siebeck. https://www.mohrsiebeck.com/en/book/heideggers-schwarze-hefte-im-kontext-9783161547911 Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on King's Research Portal is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Post-Print version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognize and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. •Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. •You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain •You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the Research Portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
    [Show full text]