Volume 12/13 ( 2018 ) Volume 12/13 ( 2018 )
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Bluenose ~ Study & Assignment Suggestions
Study & Resource Guide for Teachers on the Internationally Famous Canadian Historical Treasure, the schooner Bluenose TEACH YOUR 3. “Bluenose Fever” swept across Canada during the International races STUDENTS between 1921 and 1938. Compare this to other Canadian events that have THE stimulated similar waves of patriotism. HERITAGE 4. If practical from your location, organize a trip to the Fisheries Museum of OF THE BOAT THAT the Atlantic in Lunenburg. Housed in the buildings of a former fish processing plant HAS BEEN ON THE on Lunenburg’s historic waterfront, the museum celebrates the rich fishing CANADIAN DIME SINCE heritage of the Maritimes as well as housing an extensive collection of 1937 ~ THE ‘Bluenose’ memorabilia. SCHOONER BLUENOSE. 5. Life aboard fishing schooners was a great deal different than life at home, from Following are ideas for exhausting 16-hour days on fishing trips incorporating the hallowed to “whatever-it-took” hours to prepare the vessels for competition during the races. ‘Bluenose’ legacy into curriculum Have your class perform a skit exploring and classroom… life aboard ‘Bluenose’ a) during a fishing trip, or b) during a racing event. 1. Prepare a graph illustrating statistics associated with the ‘Bluenose’ a) racing career, and b) fishing career. Learn how ‘Bluenose’ earned the title: Queen of the North Atlantic. 2. The ‘Bluenose’ saga caught the attention of all Canadians as well as earning global recognition for her home province of Nova Scotia and home port of Lunenburg. Numerous topics can be identified as reasons why this happened. Discuss this with your class identifying time-related national and global events Bluenose, 1922. -
2008-2009 ANNUAL REPORT the World Changes Our Stories Live On
The World Changes Our Stories Live On 2008-2009 ANNUAL REPORT The World Changes Our Stories Live On © 2010 National Film Board of Canada PUBLISHED BY PHONE 514-283-9246 Communications Service FAX 514-283-8971 PO Box 6100, Station Centre-ville INTERNET onf-nfb.gc.ca Montreal, Quebec H3C 3H5 ISBN 0-7722-1265-1 1st quarter 2010 DESIGN Folio et Garetti Printed in Canada / Recycled paper Table of contents 1. Message from the Government Film Commissioner ............................ 05 2. About the National Film Board of Canada .............................................. 11 3. Highlights of the Year .............................................................................. 15 4. Progress Toward Our Strategic Goals .................................................... 21 5. Awards Highlights .................................................................................. 49 6. Governance .............................................................................................. 54 7. Senior Management ................................................................................ 55 8. Summary of Activities.............................................................................. 56 9. Financial Statements .............................................................................. 59 | 1 ANNEX I: NFB across Canada ANNEX II: Partner libraries in Canada ANNEX III: Awards ANNEX IV: Productions ANNEX V: Independent Film Projects supported by ACIC (Aide au cinéma indépendant – Canada) Independent Film Projects supported by FAP (Filmmaker -
No Quiet Revolution: Studies in the Sonic History of Montréal, 1965
No Quiet Revolution: Studies in the Sonic History of Montréal, 1965-1975 By S. D. Jowett A thesis submitted to the Department of History in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada September 2014 © S. D. Jowett, 2014 No Quiet Revolution: Studies in the Sonic History of Montréal 1965-1975 Abstract: Listening for sound and noise in Montréal during the late 1960s and early 1970s, this dissertation adds a sonic perspective to historical understanding of the later years of Québec’s “Quiet Revolution.” Guided by aurality rather than visuality, and arguing implicitly for the inclusion of sound in historical methodology, this project puts noise and silence – both literal and figurative – at the centre of the question: What does it mean to call the great transformation of Québec from 1965 to 1975 a “Quiet Revolution”? Exploring the auditory atmosphere of what was a cacophonous and dissonant decade, this thesis analyses Montréal’s urban soundscape, music, language, and acts of silencing. Taking an interdisciplinary approach, the work is informed by theories culled from existing works on sense history, sound studies, and Québec and Canadian historiography. Via the practice of “agile listening,” the dissertation seeks to re-create a sense of Montréal’s sonic environment between 1965 and 1975. ii Acknowledgements Someone once told me that writing a PhD dissertation is a lot like running a marathon: it is a long, plodding, tiring and painful exercise. Sometimes the route is not very well marked, and there is no crowd on the sidelines to cheer on the athletes. -
Transcanadiana
TransCanadiana ISSN 2392-2990 Canadian Sites of Resistance: Solidarity-Struggle-Change (?) TransCanadiana TransCanadiana, Polish Journal of Canadian Studies / Revue Polonaise d Études Canadiennes Canadian Sites of Resistance: Solidarity-Struggle-Change (?) 8. 2016 8 Canadian Sites of Resistance: Solidarity-Struggle-Change (?) TransCanadiana Polish Journal of Canadian Studies / Revue Polonaise d’Études Canadiennes Canadian Sites of Resistance: Solidarity-Struggle-Change (?) 8. 2016 Poznań 2016 Rada Wydawnicza / Advisory Board / Comité de Rédaction Maciej Abramowicz (Université Marie Curie-Skłodowska, Lublin) Klaus-Dieter Ertler (Université de Graz) Yannick Gasquy-Resch (Université Aix-Marseille) Jan Grabowski (University of Ottawa) Sherrill Grace (University of British Columbia) Thomson Highway (Writer, Distinguished Visiting Professor at Brandon University) Serge Jaumain (Université Libre de Bruxelles) Smaro Kambourelli (University of Toronto) Józef Kwaterko (Université de Varsovie) Peter Kyloušek (Université Masaryk, Brno) Larissa Lai (University of British Columbia) Norman Ravvin (Concordia University; Concordia Institute for Canadian Jewish Studies, Montreal) Anna Reczyńska (Jagiellonian University, Kraków) Radosław Rybkowski (Jagiellonian University, Kraków) Eugenia Sojka (University of Silesia) Teresa Tomaszkiewicz (Université Adam Mickiewicz, Poznań) Recenzenci naukowi / Reviewers / Rapporteurs Anna Branach-Kallas (Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń); Warren Cariou (University of Manitoba); Birgit Daewes (Europa-Universität -
A History of Film Policy and Production in Newfoundland and Labrador, 1933-1997
Dissenting Shadows: A History of Film Policy and Production in Newfoundland and Labrador, 1933-1997 by Mark David Turner A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Centre for Drama, Theatre and Performance Studies University of Toronto © Copyright by Mark David Turner 2014 Dissenting Shadows: A History of Film Policy and Production in Newfoundland and Labrador, 1933-1997 Mark David Turner Doctor of Philosophy Centre for Drama, Theatre and Performance Studies University of Toronto 2014 Abstract This thesis examines the development of film policy and production in Newfoundland and Labrador between the vote to suspend Representative Government in the Dominion of Newfoundland in 1933 and the establishment of the Newfoundland and Labrador Film Development Corporation in the province of Newfoundland in 1997. Both the Commission of Government, established by Britain in 1934, and the Provincial Government, established upon Canadian Confederation in 1949, attempted to use film to rehabilitate what was widely understood to be abject space, rendered so by its malfunctioning political and economic systems. With the development of these systems under the auspices of the Canadian state, a range of filmmakers began to use the medium to interrogate, challenge, and at times actively contravene both those corrective representations that had come before as well as the modes of governance they espoused. Part one considers the development of film policy and production on the Island of Newfoundland, the seat of both the Dominion and Provincial Governments. Beginning with a reading of the Commission of Government’s general mandate, this section traces the manners in which that mandate came to bear upon the development of film exhibition policy as it was articulated by the Department of Education and how, in turn, that ii exhibition policy came to affect the film production practices by agents of institutional and local culture. -
Evaluation of the E-Cinema Pilot Program National Film Board Of
Evaluation of the E-cinema Pilot Program National Film Board of Canada December 2011 Table of Contents Program Profile ......................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 About the NFB ................................................................................................................................................ 3 1.2 Program Description ..................................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Logic Model ..................................................................................................................................................... 8 Evaluation Framework ............................................................................................................................. 9 2.1 Evaluation Context ........................................................................................................................................ 9 2.2 Methodology .................................................................................................................................................. 9 2.3 Limitations ................................................................................................................................................... 11 Program Environment ............................................................................................................................ 12 Relevance and Rationale