DOCSLIB.ORG

Taxonomy of Rhizobia Frédéric Zakhia, Philippe De Lajudie

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Taxonomy of Rhizobia Frédéric Zakhia, Philippe De Lajudie Taxonomy of rhizobia Frédéric Zakhia, Philippe de Lajudie To cite this version: Frédéric Zakhia, Philippe de Lajudie. Taxonomy of rhizobia. Agronomie, EDP Sciences, 2001, 21 (6-7), pp.569-576. 10.1051/agro:2001146. hal-00886134 HAL Id: hal-00886134 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00886134 Submitted on 1 Jan 2001 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Agronomie 21 (2001) 569–576 569 © INRA, EDP Sciences, 2001 Review article Taxonomy of rhizobia Frédéric ZAKHIA, Philippe de LAJUDIE* Laboratoire des Symbioses Tropicales et Méditerranéennes, UMR 113 INRA/AGRO-M/CIRAD/IRD, TA 10 / J, Campus International de Baillarguet, 34398 Montpellier Cedex 5, France (Received 15 January 2001; revised 8 March 2001; accepted 13 March 2001) Abstract – Rhizobia are the bacteria that form nitrogen-fixing symbioses with legumes. Based on their characterisation by polypha- sic taxonomy, their classification has undergone great changes in recent years. The current six rhizobium genera and 28 recognised species are reviewed here. Rhizobium / taxonomy Résumé – Taxonomie des rhizobia. Les rhizobia sont les bactéries qui forment des symbioses fixatrices d’azote avec des plantes de la famille des légumineuses. Suite à l’adoption de la taxonomie polyphasique comme critère de caractérisation, leur classification a subi de nombreux remaniements ces dernières années. Une revue de cette classification en six genres et 28 espèces actuellement reconnus est présentée ici. Rhizobium / taxonomie 1. INTRODUCTION Rhizobia are diverse and, during recent years, their classification has undergone great changes due to new Nitrogen fixation, that is to say the reduction of phylogenetic and polyphasic data leading to the descrip- atmospheric nitrogen to ammonia, is the basic phenome- tion of new taxa [73]. Still it is an expanding field non making nitrogen available for the biosphere. Among because more and more rhizobia are isolated and charac- living organisms, only some prokaryotes have this abili- terised every day, especially from the tropical and the ty. They are spread over many of the major bacterial mediterranean zones, where diversity is still poorly doc- phyla. Among these, some soil bacteria, commonly and umented. collectively called rhizobium or rhizobia, can form sym- Until the early 1980s all symbiotic nitrogen-fixing bioses with leguminous plants. They induce the forma- bacteria from leguminous plants were classified in the tion of specialised organs, called nodules, where they fix single genus Rhizobium, including six species R. legumi- nitrogen to the benefit of the plant. These symbioses nosarum, R. meliloti, R. trifolii, R. phaseoli, R. lupini have major environmental and agricultural importance and R. japonicum. This taxonomy matched the cross- since they are responsible for most of the biological inoculation groups, defined as the set of host-plants atmospheric nitrogen fixation on earth. nodulated by the same bacterial strains. For a long time Communicated by Jean-Jacques Drevon (Montpellier, France) * Correspondence and reprints [email protected] 570 F. Zakhia, P. de Lajudie the genera Rhizobium, Agrobacterium, and field of application, dependent on the addressed ques- Phyllobacterium were grouped in the family tion, the particular conditions, the number and the type Rhizobiaceae mainly based on their common functional of strains. The level of discrimination of a technique may characteristic of inducing cell proliferations on plants. vary depending on the studied bacterial taxon. In a polyphasic approach various complementary techniques Taxonomy based on the concept of cross-inoculation with different discriminating levels are chosen to charac- groups failed because of the many exceptions to this terise the strains to be classified. The conclusion should rule. Moreover, at the same time, it was also widely rec- be a consensus with minimal contradictions, drawing ognized that Rhizobium classification should adjust to nomenclatural consequences and emphasising fast and general bacterial taxonomy, and include a panel of reliable features for identification (preferably monopha- genomic, phenotypic and phylogenetic features instead sic). Vandamme et al. [57] last reformulated the phylo- of the sole nodulation properties. Molecular techniques genetic concept of the bacterial species as the assem- have developed considerably during the past 20 years blage of isolates which originated from a common and were made available for characterisation of rhizobia, ancestor population in which a steady generation of leading to considerable changes in their classification. genetic diversity resulted in clones with different degrees of recombination and characterised by a certain degree of phenotypic consistency, by a significant degree of 2. POLYPHASIC TAXONOMY DNA/DNA hybridisation and by over 97% 16S rDNA sequence homology. Taxonomy studies the natural relationships existing between organisms and leads to their classification, a pre-requisite for the identification of any organism. 3. CURRENT RHIZOBIUM TAXONOMY Taxonomy [23] comprises (i) characterisation of the organisms, (ii) classification on the basis of similarity, Rhizobia are rod bacteria, Gram-negative, aerobic, not (iii) nomenclature to give names to groups and (iv) iden- sporulated [29]. Phylogenetically, they belong to the tification of unknown organisms, to determine if they alpha subdivision of Proteobacteria. When it was recog- belong or not to one of the units classified and/or named. nised that the host spectrum was not the sole criterium to The central concept of bacterial taxonomy is the bacteri- take into account for rhizobium classification, the al species. Unlike animals and plants, bacteria have sim- Rhizobium species were first reclassified into two gen- ple morphological and physiological characteristics, lim- era, the revised Rhizobium genus including the fast ited and insufficient for taxonomic descriptions [68]. It is growing strains, and the new genus Bradyrhizobium, cre- now recognised that bacterial classification must reflect ated for the slow growing ones [28]. Since then, isolation the phylogenetic relationships between bacteria, main of rhizobia from an increasing number of plant species witnesses of which are the sequences of ribosomal RNA. around the world and their characterisation by modern In 1987, a group of taxonomists proposed a phylogenetic polyphasic taxonomy [57] has led to the description of definition of the bacterial species based on various additional new genera and species (Tab. I). Based on methodologies including the study of 16S ribosomal 16S ribosomal DNA sequences, the symbionts of legu- RNA and DNA/DNA hybridisations, but still recom- minous plants belong to three main separate phylogenet- mending laying out discriminating phenotypic character- ic branches (Fig. 1). istics to name a new species [62]. Previously Colwell [9] founded the basis of modern bacterial taxonomy by rec- ommending the integration of all pieces of information 3.1. Rhizobium/Agrobacterium branch obtained at various levels of the cell - DNA, RNA, phe- notypic and expressed features (proteins and their func- A first branch consists of several subbranches, each tions, fatty acids, chimiotaxonomic markers) and by var- corresponding to four rhizobial genera, i.e. Rhizobium, ious techniques contributing to a polyphasic taxonomy Sinorhizobium, Mesorhizobium and Allorhizobium, inter- likely to lead to a more stable classification. During the mixed with other genera, some plant-related bacteria last twenty years, many techniques of bacterial charac- (Agrobacterium, Phyllobacterium), soil bacteria terisation have been developed at each level of informa- (Mycoplana), and clinical bacteria (Brucella, tion, and more computer facilities are becoming every Ochrobactrum, Bartonella). The first subbranch corre- day available for numerical analysis of data. sponds to the s.s. Rhizobium genus and includes R. legu- Each technique used in taxonomy has (i) its own dis- minosarum (type species), R. tropici [37], R. etli [50], criminating power varying from the individual or species R. gallicum [2], R. mongolense [56] and Agrobacterium levels to the genus, family and higher levels, and (ii) its biovar 2. The second subbranch corresponds to the Taxonomy of rhizobia 571 Table I. Classification of nitrogen fixing bacteria forming symbioses with legume plants. Species Host-plant References Rhizobium 22 R. leguminosarum 22, 29 biovar viciae Pisum sativum, Vicia, Lathyrus, Lens 22, 29 biovar trifolii Trifolium pratense 22, 29 biovar phaseoli Phaseolus vulgaris 22, 29 R. tropici Type II A Phaseolus vulgaris, Leucaena leucocephala 37 Type II B Phaseolus vulgaris, Leucaena leucocephala 37 R. etli 50 biovar phaseoli Phaseolus vulgaris 24, 50 biovar mimosae Mimosa affinis, Leucaena leucocephala, Phaseolus vulgaris L. 60 R. hainanense Desmodium sinuatum & other plants of arid regions 8 R. gallicum 2 biovar gallicum Phaseolus vulgaris 2 biovar phaseoli Phaseolus vulgaris 2 R. mongolense Medicago ruthenica 56 R.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks Bioblitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks BioBlitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event Natural Resource Report NPS/GOGA/NRR—2016/1147 ON THIS PAGE Photograph of BioBlitz participants conducting data entry into iNaturalist. Photograph courtesy of the National Park Service. ON THE COVER Photograph of BioBlitz participants collecting aquatic species data in the Presidio of San Francisco. Photograph courtesy of National Park Service. The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks BioBlitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event Natural Resource Report NPS/GOGA/NRR—2016/1147 Elizabeth Edson1, Michelle O’Herron1, Alison Forrestel2, Daniel George3 1Golden Gate Parks Conservancy Building 201 Fort Mason San Francisco, CA 94129 2National Park Service. Golden Gate National Recreation Area Fort Cronkhite, Bldg. 1061 Sausalito, CA 94965 3National Park Service. San Francisco Bay Area Network Inventory & Monitoring Program Manager Fort Cronkhite, Bldg. 1063 Sausalito, CA 94965 March 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Rhizobia Associated with Amorpha Fruticosa Isolated from Chinese Soils and Description of Mesorhizobium Amorphae Sp
    International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology (1999), 49, 5 1-65 Printed in Great Britain Diversity of rhizobia associated with Amorpha fruticosa isolated from Chinese soils and description of Mesorhizobium amorphae sp. nov. E. T. Wang,lt3 P. van Berkum,2 X. H. SU~,~D. Beyene,2 W. X. Chen3 and E. Martinez-Romerol Author for correspondence : E. T. Wang. Tel : + 52 73 131697. Fax: + 52 73 175581. e-mail: [email protected] 1 Centro de lnvestigacidn Fifty-five Chinese isolates from nodules of Amorpha fruticosa were sobre Fijaci6n de characterized and compared with the type strains of the species and genera of Nitrdgeno, UNAM, Apdo Postal 565-A, Cuernavaca, bacteria which form nitrogen-f ixing symbioses with leguminous host plants. A Morelos, Mexico polyphasic approach, which included RFLP of PCR-amplified 165 rRNA genes, * Alfalfa and Soybean multilocus enzyme electrophoresis (MLEE), DNA-DNA hybridization, 165 rRNA Research Laboratory, gene sequencing, electrophoretic plasmid profiles, cross-nodulation and a Ag ricuI tu ra I Research phenotypic study, was used in the comparative analysis. The isolates Service, US Department of Agriculture, BeltsviI le, M D originated from several different sites in China and they varied in their 20705, USA phenotypic and genetic characteristics. The majority of the isolates had 3 Department of moderate to slow growth rates, produced acid on YMA and harboured a 930 kb Microbiology, College of symbiotic plasmid (pSym). Five different RFLP patterns were identified among Biology, China Agricultural the 16s rRNA genes of all the isolates. Isolates grouped by PCR-RFLP of the 165 University, Beijing 100094, People’s Republic of China rRNA genes were also separated into groups by variation in MLEE profiles and by DNA-DNA hybridization.
    [Show full text]
  • Host-Secreted Antimicrobial Peptide Enforces Symbiotic Selectivity in Medicago Truncatula
    Host-secreted antimicrobial peptide enforces symbiotic selectivity in Medicago truncatula Qi Wanga, Shengming Yanga, Jinge Liua, Kata Terecskeib, Edit Ábrahámb, Anikó Gombárc, Ágota Domonkosc, Attila Szucs} b, Péter Körmöczib, Ting Wangb, Lili Fodorc, Linyong Maod,e, Zhangjun Feid,e, Éva Kondorosib,1, Péter Kalóc, Attila Keresztb, and Hongyan Zhua,1 aDepartment of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546; bInstitute of Biochemistry, Biological Research Center, Szeged 6726, Hungary; cNational Agricultural Research and Innovation Centre, Agricultural Biotechnology Institute, Gödöllo} 2100, Hungary; dBoyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853; and eU.S. Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service Robert W. Holley Center for Agriculture and Health, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 Contributed by Éva Kondorosi, February 14, 2017 (sent for review January 17, 2017; reviewed by Rebecca Dickstein and Julia Frugoli) Legumes engage in root nodule symbioses with nitrogen-fixing effectors or microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) soil bacteria known as rhizobia. In nodule cells, bacteria are enclosed such as surface polysaccharides to facilitate their invasion of the in membrane-bound vesicles called symbiosomes and differentiate host (7, 8). Therefore, effector- or MAMP-triggered plant im- into bacteroids that are capable of converting atmospheric nitrogen munity mediated by intracellular nucleotide binding/leucine-rich into ammonia. Bacteroid differentiation
    [Show full text]
  • Pfc5813.Pdf (9.887Mb)
    UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE CARTAGENA ESCUELA TÉCNICA SUPERIOR DE INGENIERÍA AGRONÓMICA DEPARTAMENTO DE PRODUCCIÓN VEGETAL INGENIERO AGRÓNOMO PROYECTO FIN DE CARRERA: “AISLAMIENTO E IDENTIFICACIÓN DE LOS RIZOBIOS ASOCIADOS A LOS NÓDULOS DE ASTRAGALUS NITIDIFLORUS”. Realizado por: Noelia Real Giménez Dirigido por: María José Vicente Colomer Francisco José Segura Carreras Cartagena, Julio de 2014. ÍNDICE GENERAL 1. Introducción…………………………………………………….…………………………………………………1 1.1. Astragalus nitidiflorus………………………………..…………………………………………………2 1.1.1. Encuadre taxonómico……………………………….…..………………………………………………2 1.1.2. El origen de Astragalus nitidiflorus………………………………………………………………..4 1.1.3. Descripción de la especie………..…………………………………………………………………….5 1.1.4. Biología…………………………………………………………………………………………………………7 1.1.4.1. Ciclo vegetativo………………….……………………………………………………………………7 1.1.4.2. Fenología de la floración……………………………………………………………………….9 1.1.4.3. Sistema de reproducción……………………………………………………………………….10 1.1.4.4. Dispersión de los frutos…………………………………….…………………………………..11 1.1.4.5. Nodulación con Rhizobium…………………………………………………………………….12 1.1.4.6. Diversidad genética……………………………………………………………………………....13 1.1.5. Ecología………………………………………………………………………………………………..…….14 1.1.6. Corología y tamaño poblacional……………………………………………………..…………..15 1.1.7. Protección…………………………………………………………………………………………………..18 1.1.8. Amenazas……………………………………………………………………………………………………19 1.1.8.1. Factores bióticos…………………………………………………………………………………..19 1.1.8.2. Factores abióticos………………………………………………………………………………….20 1.1.8.3. Factores antrópicos………………..…………………………………………………………….21
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting the Taxonomy of Allorhizobium Vitis (Ie
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.19.423612; this version posted December 21, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-ND 4.0 International license. Revisiting the taxonomy of Allorhizobium vitis (i.e. Agrobacterium vitis) using genomics - emended description of All. vitis sensu stricto and description of Allorhizobium ampelinum sp. nov. Nemanja Kuzmanović1,*, Enrico Biondi2, Jörg Overmann3, Joanna Puławska4, Susanne Verbarg3, Kornelia Smalla1, Florent Lassalle5,6,* 1Julius Kühn-Institut, Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants (JKI), Institute for Epidemiology and Pathogen Diagnostics, Messeweg 11-12, 38104 Braunschweig, Germany 2Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Viale G. Fanin, 42, 40127 Bologna, Italy 3Leibniz Institute DSMZ-German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures, Inhoffenstrasse 7B, 38124 Braunschweig, Germany 4Research Institute of Horticulture, ul. Konstytucji 3 Maja 1/3, 96-100 Skierniewice, Poland 5Imperial College London, St-Mary’s Hospital campus, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Praed Street, London W2 1NY, UK; Imperial College London, St-Mary’s Hospital campus, MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Praed Street, London W2 1NY, United Kingdom 6Wellcome Sanger Institute, Pathogens and Microbes Programme, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Saffron Walden, CB10 1RQ, United Kingdom *Corresponding authors. Contact: [email protected], [email protected] (N. Kuzmanovid); [email protected] (F. Lassalle) bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.19.423612; this version posted December 21, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Agrobacterium Strains Associated with Georgia Pecan Trees and an Immunological Study of the Bacterium
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Hacene Bouzar for the degree of Master of Science in Botany & Plant Pathology presented on December 17, 1982 Title: A SURVEY OF AGROBACTERIUM STRAINS ASSOCIATED WITH GEORGIA PECAN TREES AND AN IMMUNOLOGICAL STUDY OF THE BACTERIUM Abstract approved: Redacted for Privacy Larry W. Moore Crown gall was found in numerous pecan orchards in Georgia. In some instances, 60% of the trees were diseased. Galled trees were less vigorous than noninfected trees. Among the pathogenic Agrobacterium strains isolated from 18 galled trees from six counties, biovar 1 strains predominated and most were sensitive to agrocin 84 in vitro. A representative biovar 1 strain from pecan was inhibited from infecting tomato seedlings by A. radiobacter K84. We would expect that biological control of crown gallin Georgia pecan orchards with strain K84 would be successful. Because the taxonomy of the members of the Rhizobiaceae has not been resolved by classical and modern methods of microbial classification, a serological analysis of the 50S ribosomal subunits was made. Antisera raised against 50S ribosomal subunits of five different agrobacteria were used to arrange 31 Agrobacterium strains and 6 Rhizobium strains into 16 serovars. The immunological relationships of 50S subunits of Agrobacterium did not confirm either of the major taxonomic groupings; fast-growing rhizobiacould not be immunologically differenciated from the agrobacteria andwere closely related to the biovar 3 strain CG64. The five antisera were specific at the family level. The antigenic structure of 50S ribosomal subunits of tumorigenic strain C58 and rhizogenic strain A4 were compared to that of their avirulent derivatives (NT1 and A4R1, respectively) and to strain A323 (A NT1 that was transformed with the large nopaline plasmid from K84) using Ouchterlony doubly diffusion tests.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Genomics of Bradyrhizobium Japonicum CPAC
    Siqueira et al. BMC Genomics 2014, 15:420 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/15/420 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Comparative genomics of Bradyrhizobium japonicum CPAC 15 and Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens CPAC 7: elite model strains for understanding symbiotic performance with soybean Arthur Fernandes Siqueira1,2†, Ernesto Ormeño-Orrillo3†,RangelCelsoSouza4,ElisetePainsRodrigues5, Luiz Gonzaga Paula Almeida4, Fernando Gomes Barcellos5, Jesiane Stefânia Silva Batista6, Andre Shigueyoshi Nakatani2, Esperanza Martínez-Romero3, Ana Tereza Ribeiro Vasconcelos4 and Mariangela Hungria1,2* Abstract Background: The soybean-Bradyrhizobium symbiosis can be highly efficient in fixing nitrogen, but few genomic sequences of elite inoculant strains are available. Here we contribute with information on the genomes of two commercial strains that are broadly applied to soybean crops in the tropics. B. japonicum CPAC 15 (=SEMIA 5079) is outstanding in its saprophytic capacity and competitiveness, whereas B. diazoefficiens CPAC 7 (=SEMIA 5080) is known for its high efficiency in fixing nitrogen. Both are well adapted to tropical soils. The genomes of CPAC 15 and CPAC 7 were compared to each other and also to those of B. japonicum USDA 6T and B. diazoefficiens USDA 110T. Results: Differences in genome size were found between species, with B. japonicum having larger genomes than B. diazoefficiens. Although most of the four genomes were syntenic, genome rearrangements within and between species were observed, including events in the symbiosis island. In addition to the symbiotic region, several genomic islands were identified. Altogether, these features must confer high genomic plasticity that might explain adaptation and differences in symbiotic performance. It was not possible to attribute known functions to half of the predicted genes.
    [Show full text]
  • Azorhizobium Doebereinerae Sp. Nov
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Systematic and Applied Microbiology 29 (2006) 197–206 www.elsevier.de/syapm Azorhizobium doebereinerae sp. Nov. Microsymbiont of Sesbania virgata (Caz.) Pers.$ Fa´tima Maria de Souza Moreiraa,Ã, Leonardo Cruzb,Se´rgio Miana de Fariac, Terence Marshd, Esperanza Martı´nez-Romeroe,Fa´bio de Oliveira Pedrosab, Rosa Maria Pitardc, J. Peter W. Youngf aDepto. Cieˆncia do solo, Universidade Federal de Lavras, C.P. 3037 , 37 200–000, Lavras, MG, Brazil bUniversidade Federal do Parana´, C.P. 19046, 81513-990, PR, Brazil cEmbrapa Agrobiologia, antiga estrada Rio, Sa˜o Paulo km 47, 23 851-970, Serope´dica, RJ, Brazil dCenter for Microbial Ecology, Michigan State University, MI 48824, USA eCentro de Investigacio´n sobre Fijacio´n de Nitro´geno, Universidad Nacional Auto´noma de Mexico, Apdo Postal 565-A, Cuernavaca, Mor, Me´xico fDepartment of Biology, University of York, PO Box 373, York YO10 5YW, UK Received 18 August 2005 Abstract Thirty-four rhizobium strains were isolated from root nodules of the fast-growing woody native species Sesbania virgata in different regions of southeast Brazil (Minas Gerais and Rio de Janeiro States). These isolates had cultural characteristics on YMA quite similar to Azorhizobium caulinodans (alkalinization, scant extracellular polysaccharide production, fast or intermediate growth rate). They exhibited a high similarity of phenotypic and genotypic characteristics among themselves and to a lesser extent with A. caulinodans. DNA:DNA hybridization and 16SrRNA sequences support their inclusion in the genus Azorhizobium, but not in the species A. caulinodans. The name A. doebereinerae is proposed, with isolate UFLA1-100 ( ¼ BR5401, ¼ LMG9993 ¼ SEMIA 6401) as the type strain.
    [Show full text]
  • Polyamine Profiles of Some Members of the Alpha Subclass of the Class Proteobacteria: Polyamine Analysis of Twenty Recently Described Genera
    Microbiol. Cult. Coll. June 2003. p. 13 ─ 21 Vol. 19, No. 1 Polyamine Profiles of Some Members of the Alpha Subclass of the Class Proteobacteria: Polyamine Analysis of Twenty Recently Described Genera Koei Hamana1）＊，Azusa Sakamoto1），Satomi Tachiyanagi1）， Eri Terauchi1）and Mariko Takeuchi2） 1）Department of Laboratory Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Gunma University, 39 ─ 15 Showa-machi 3 ─ chome, Maebashi, Gunma 371 ─ 8514, Japan 2）Institute for Fermentation, Osaka, 17 ─ 85, Juso-honmachi 2 ─ chome, Yodogawa-ku, Osaka, 532 ─ 8686, Japan Cellular polyamines of 41 newly validated or reclassified alpha proteobacteria belonging to 20 genera were analyzed by HPLC. Acetic acid bacteria belonging to the new genus Asaia and the genera Gluconobacter, Gluconacetobacter, Acetobacter and Acidomonas of the alpha ─ 1 sub- group ubiquitously contained spermidine as the major polyamine. Aerobic bacteriochlorophyll a ─ containing Acidisphaera, Craurococcus and Paracraurococcus（alpha ─ 1）and Roseibium （alpha-2）contained spermidine and lacked homospermidine. New Rhizobium species, including some species transferred from the genera Agrobacterium and Allorhizobium, and new Sinorhizobium and Mesorhizobium species of the alpha ─ 2 subgroup contained homospermidine as a major polyamine. Homospermidine was the major polyamine in the genera Oligotropha, Carbophilus, Zavarzinia, Blastobacter, Starkeya and Rhodoblastus of the alpha ─ 2 subgroup. Rhodobaca bogoriensis of the alpha ─ 3 subgroup contained spermidine. Within the alpha ─ 4 sub- group, the genus Sphingomonas has been divided into four clusters, and species of the emended Sphingomonas（cluster I）contained homospermidine whereas those of the three newly described genera Sphingobium, Novosphingobium and Sphingopyxis（corresponding to clusters II, III and IV of the former Sphingomonas）ubiquitously contained spermidine.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised Taxonomy of the Family Rhizobiaceae, and Phylogeny of Mesorhizobia Nodulating Glycyrrhiza Spp
    Division of Microbiology and Biotechnology Department of Food and Environmental Sciences University of Helsinki Finland Revised taxonomy of the family Rhizobiaceae, and phylogeny of mesorhizobia nodulating Glycyrrhiza spp. Seyed Abdollah Mousavi Academic Dissertation To be presented, with the permission of the Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry of the University of Helsinki, for public examination in lecture hall 3, Viikki building B, Latokartanonkaari 7, on the 20th of May 2016, at 12 o’clock noon. Helsinki 2016 Supervisor: Professor Kristina Lindström Department of Environmental Sciences University of Helsinki, Finland Pre-examiners: Professor Jaakko Hyvönen Department of Biosciences University of Helsinki, Finland Associate Professor Chang Fu Tian State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology College of Biological Sciences China Agricultural University, China Opponent: Professor J. Peter W. Young Department of Biology University of York, England Cover photo by Kristina Lindström Dissertationes Schola Doctoralis Scientiae Circumiectalis, Alimentariae, Biologicae ISSN 2342-5423 (print) ISSN 2342-5431 (online) ISBN 978-951-51-2111-0 (paperback) ISBN 978-951-51-2112-7 (PDF) Electronic version available at http://ethesis.helsinki.fi/ Unigrafia Helsinki 2016 2 ABSTRACT Studies of the taxonomy of bacteria were initiated in the last quarter of the 19th century when bacteria were classified in six genera placed in four tribes based on their morphological appearance. Since then the taxonomy of bacteria has been revolutionized several times. At present, 30 phyla belong to the domain “Bacteria”, which includes over 9600 species. Unlike many eukaryotes, bacteria lack complex morphological characters and practically phylogenetically informative fossils. It is partly due to these reasons that bacterial taxonomy is complicated.
    [Show full text]
  • Microbiological Study in Petrol-Spiked Soil
    molecules Article Microbiological Study in Petrol-Spiked Soil Agata Borowik , Jadwiga Wyszkowska * and Jan Kucharski Department of Soil Science and Microbiology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-727 Olsztyn, Poland; [email protected] (A.B.); [email protected] (J.K.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The pollution of arable lands and water with petroleum-derived products is still a valid problem, mainly due the extensive works aimed to improve their production technology to reduce fuel consumption and protect engines. An example of the upgraded fuels is the BP 98 unleaded petrol with Active technology. A pot experiment was carried out in which Eutric Cambisol soil was polluted with petrol to determine its effect on the microbiological and biochemical properties of this soil. Analyses were carried out to determine soil microbiome composition—with the incubation and metagenomic methods, the activity of seven enzymes, and cocksfoot effect on hydrocarbon degradation. The following indices were determined: colony development index (CD); ecophysiological diversity index (EP); index of cocksfoot effect on soil microorganisms and enzymes (IFG); index of petrol effect on soil microorganisms and enzymes (IFP); index of the resistance of microorganisms, enzymes, and cocksfoot to soil pollution with petrol (RS); Shannon–Weaver’s index of bacterial taxa diversity (H); and Shannon–Weaver’s index of hydrocarbon degradation (IDH). The soil pollution with petrol was found to increase population numbers of bacteria and fungi, and Protebacteria phylum abundance as well as to decrease the abundance of Actinobacteria and Acidobacteria phyla. The cultivation of cocksfoot on the petrol-polluted soil had an especially beneficial effect mainly on the Citation: Borowik, A.; Wyszkowska, bacteria belonging to the Ramlibacter, Pseudoxanthomonas, Mycoplana, and Sphingobium genera.
    [Show full text]
  • Specificity in Legume-Rhizobia Symbioses
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Specificity in Legume-Rhizobia Symbioses Mitchell Andrews * and Morag E. Andrews Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, PO Box 84, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +64-3-423-0692 Academic Editors: Peter M. Gresshoff and Brett Ferguson Received: 12 February 2017; Accepted: 21 March 2017; Published: 26 March 2017 Abstract: Most species in the Leguminosae (legume family) can fix atmospheric nitrogen (N2) via symbiotic bacteria (rhizobia) in root nodules. Here, the literature on legume-rhizobia symbioses in field soils was reviewed and genotypically characterised rhizobia related to the taxonomy of the legumes from which they were isolated. The Leguminosae was divided into three sub-families, the Caesalpinioideae, Mimosoideae and Papilionoideae. Bradyrhizobium spp. were the exclusive rhizobial symbionts of species in the Caesalpinioideae, but data are limited. Generally, a range of rhizobia genera nodulated legume species across the two Mimosoideae tribes Ingeae and Mimoseae, but Mimosa spp. show specificity towards Burkholderia in central and southern Brazil, Rhizobium/Ensifer in central Mexico and Cupriavidus in southern Uruguay. These specific symbioses are likely to be at least in part related to the relative occurrence of the potential symbionts in soils of the different regions. Generally, Papilionoideae species were promiscuous in relation to rhizobial symbionts, but specificity for rhizobial genus appears to hold at the tribe level for the Fabeae (Rhizobium), the genus level for Cytisus (Bradyrhizobium), Lupinus (Bradyrhizobium) and the New Zealand native Sophora spp. (Mesorhizobium) and species level for Cicer arietinum (Mesorhizobium), Listia bainesii (Methylobacterium) and Listia angolensis (Microvirga).
    [Show full text]