DOCSLIB.ORG

President's Column

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

AAS Newsletter January/February 2011, Issue 156 - The Online Publication for the members of the American Astronomical Society CONTENTS President's Column Debra Meloy Elmegreen, [email protected] 2 From the By the time you read this article, the Seattle meeting will be history, and the path forward on the implementation of Astro2010 Decadal Survey recommendations may be more clear. But as I am writing Executive Office it, we are just in the midst of trying to understand how the new Congress will respond to scientific research needs in general and to astronomical priorities in particular, especially in light of the recently released Casani report on the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) cost overruns. Congress needs to be 3 reminded that basic research is important for the country. The benefits to society are broad, ranging from discoveries and innovative technologies that improve our lives, to a more technically competent workforce, The Meeting the creation of new industries, and a scientifically literate society. At the present, though, the outlook for Program increased support in astronomy, whether space-based or ground-based, appears bleak. This is a challenge for the astronomical community, as we look forward to implementing the New Worlds, New Horizons (NWNH) recommendations. 4 A lot is at stake. Astro2010 took JWST as a given in building its integrated program of activities, since our Journals Update task was to consider only those projects that were not yet underway. The top-ranked large space mission, WFIRST, is a relatively modest investment compared with JWST and Hubble Space Telescope (HST). Its carefully assessed cost and risk resulted in a realistic budget that should not be subject to the huge increases that befell the others. During the past few months, we have heard, through agency reports to 6 the NASA Astrophysics Committee, the inter-agency Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee, Member and the National Research Council (NRC) Board of Physics and Astronomy, about the likely delay of the Wield-Field Infared Survey Telescope (WFIRST) following the further delay of JWST. The NWNH report Anniversaries recommended the formation of a Decadal Survey implementation advisory committee to address possible mid-course adjustments if circumstances changed a lot. It appears we will need that committee sooner rather than later. 10-11 I think NASA is taking a positive step in moving JWST from the Astrophysics Division and making it a 42nd DPS Meeting NASA-wide responsibility. That gives me hope that JWST, which is critical to our community, will still launch; indeed it cannot be allowed to fail. Much of the science of the next decade will use the data gathered by JWST, which will also serve as a springboard and as a complement to other endeavors. In addition, the leadership of the U.S. in astronomy depends on our development and execution of large 12 projects like JWST. Agency News This move of JWST also means that there should still be NASA Astrophysics funds to accomplish some of the exciting activities in the Decadal report. It is important to remember that the recommendations called for an integrated plan, giving equal weight to small, medium, and large priorities. Even if WFIRST Back page is delayed, the smaller missions and activities should still be done. Indeed, our community depends on Washington these. They include more frequent Explorer and suborbital launches that provide rapid data turnaround and training for the next generation of instrumentalists, and technology development, especially targeting News exoplanet and cosmic microwave background polarization research. These are also stepping stones to the large missions of the future. Regarding ground-based astronomy, increases in NSF Astronomy Division funding are also in jeopardy. My hope is that Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) and eventually a Giant Segmental Mirror Telescope (GSMT) can move forward into the NSF-wide Major Research Equipment and Facilities Construction (MREFC) funding lines for large projects, but these may still require an Astronomy Division commitment to subsequent operating funds. The next NSF Senior Review (i.e., the prioritization of ongoing projects A A to consider possible closures) will be critical for opening the way towards new starts. We look forward to Cornell Caltech Atacama Telescope (CCAT) as a complement to Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA). S In addition, the recommended NSF mid-scale innovations program of competitive funding would go a continued on page 2 AAS Officers President's Column continued from front page Debra M. Elmegreen, President J. Craig Wheeler, Past-President Christine Jones, Vice-President long way towards advancing a variety of subfields by supporting projects such as advanced Lee Anne Willson, Vice-President adaptive optics, pathfinders towards a Square Kilometer Array (SKA) such as Hydrogen Epoch Nicholas B. Suntzeff, Vice-President of Reionization Arrays (HERA), high energy, and solar research. At the same time, support and Hervey (Peter) Stockman, Treasurer G. Fritz Benedict, Secretary augmentation to the core programs, including funding for our national observatories and for Richard F. Green, Pub Board Chair analysis, theory and theory networks, computation, archiving, and laboratory astrophysics, is Timothy F. Slater, Education Officer vital for carrying out the astronomical enterprise. Richard Fienberg, Press Officer & Education Outreach Coordinator The way forward partly depends on Congress and funding agencies getting our message of why Councilors astronomy is important to the nation, even during times of great fiscal stress. Decadal Survey Richard G. French leaders have been actively engaging Washington staffers in discussions. Kevin Marvel and Bahcall Edward F. Guinan fellow Bethany Johns, along with the AAS officers and the AAS Committee on Astronomy and Patricia Knezek Public Policy, will be particularly active this spring after the unveiling of President Obama’s James D. Lowenthal FY2012 budget request. I would like to acknowledge the generosity of Jack Burns, previous Robert Mathieu Nancy Morrison CAPP chair, and J. Craig Wheeler, our previous past-president, in agreeing to serve in those C. Megan Urry roles once again, following our untimely and tragic loss of John Huchra. Be sure to volunteer Charles E. Woodward for Congressional Visit Day taking place in April if you would like to be involved too, and take Jennifer Wiseman time to write to your member of Congress and let them know astronomy is important to you. We must not be complacent and assume that New Worlds, New Horizons will convince Congress Executive Office Staff Kevin B. Marvel, Executive Officer to fund our work; we must make our collective voice heard. Tracy Beale, Membership Services Administrator Chris Biemesderfer, Director of Publishing From the Executive Office Laronda Boyce, Meetings & Exhibits Coordinator Kevin B. Marvel, Executive Officer, [email protected] Kelly E. Clark, Chief Financial Officer Kim Earle, Director of Meeting Services As I write this column, we are preparing for the Seattle AAS meeting and preparing for Scott Garvey, Administrative Assistant the holidays. The meeting is setting up to have record attendance for a meeting outside Lisa Idem, Meetings Administrator of Washington. Nearly 2700 people will end up attending this meeting. [Note: 2950 actually Scott Idem, Systems & Network atended]. The AAS meeting continues to play an important role in our community, serving as Director Bethany Johns, Public Policy Fellow a focal point for our discipline, both scientifically and collaboratively. One of my great joys is Judith M. Johnson, Director of seeing members working side-by-side at our meeting, laptops open, focused gazes on glowing Communications screens displaying HST data, spectra from the Hobby-Eberly Telescope (HET) or Chandra Kara North, Meetings Abstract images....it is great that so much collaboration and actual work gets done at our meeting. Administrator Faye C. Peterson, Director of Membership Services Our meetings have expanded regularly over the years and we continue to seek ways to enhance Crystal M. Tinch, Membership their value to our community. Allowing greater flexibility for splinter meetings, whether for Communications Manager collaborative teams, mission planning or even science workshops was one enhancement that led directly to increased attendance. Allowing undergraduates to present research was another step The AAS Newsletter (ISSN 8750- 9350) is published bi-monthly by endorsed by the AAS Council way back in 1998 that led to more attendance at our meetings. the American Astronomical Society, We have one of the highest attendance ratios in the non-profit scientific society sector. I think 2000 Florida Avenue, NW, Suite 400, this speaks to our strong sense of community and the continuing value of our meetings to our Washington, DC 20009-1231; Tel: members. We are always open to new ideas on how to improve our services to you and to our 202-328-2010, Fax: 202-234-2560, [email protected]; www.aas.org. discipline. Feel free to send them in so we can continue to enhance the Society’s value to you as a research astronomer, planetary astronomer, solar physicist, historian, high energy astronomer Items of general interest to be considered (aren’t we all?) or dynamicist. for publication in the AAS Newsletter should be sent to [email protected]. This is our first all electronic issue of the Newsletter. We have undertaken this change to a) Appropriate pictures are welcome. For information about deadlines and save money, b) save resources and have a positive impact on the environment and c) match submitting articles, see www.aas.org/ our methods of communication to our membership. Members who wish to receive a printed publications/newsletter.php. Items version and let us know, will continue to receive a printed version in a slightly different submitted to the AAS Newsletter are format. We anticipate this is a transitional phase for our Newsletter as further developments in not automatically included in the AAS Electronic Announcements or vice technology will allow new and innovative communication channels directly to our membership versa.
Recommended publications
  • Refereed Publications That Name

    Refereed Publications That Name

    59 Refereed Publications Since 2011 with Named Co-Authors who are NASA Citizen Scientists Compiled by Marc Kuchner February 2021 Authors in bold are citizen scientists. Aurorasaurus Semeter, J., Hunnekuhl, M., MacDonald, E., Hirsch, M., Zeller, N., Chernenkoff, A., & Wang, J. (2020). The mysterious green streaks below STEVE. AGU Advances, 1, e2020AV000183. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020AV000183 Hunnekuhl, M., & MacDonald, E. (2020). Early ground‐based work by auroral pioneer Carl Størmer on the high‐altitude detached subauroral arcs now known as “STEVE”. Space Weather, 18, e2019SW002384. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019SW002384 S. B. Mende. B. J. Harding, & C. Turner. “Subauroral Green STEVE Arcs: Evidence for Low- Energy Excitation” Geophysical Research Letters, Volume 46, Issue 24, Pages 14256-14262 (2019) http://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086145 S. B. Mende. & C. Turner. “Color Ratios of Subauroral (STEVE) Arcs” Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics),Volume 124, Issue 7, Pages 5945-5955 (2019) http://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA026851 Y. Nishimura, Y., B, Gallardo-Lacourt, B., Y, Zou, E. Mishin, D.J. Knudsen, E. F. Donovan, V. Angelopoulos, R. Raybell, “Magnetospheric Signatures of STEVE: Implications for the Magnetospheric Energy Source and Interhemispheric Conjugacy” Geophysical Research Letters, Volume 46, Issue 11, Pages 5637-5644 (2019) Elizabeth A. MacDonald, Eric Donovan, Yukitoshi Nishimura, Nathan A. Case, D. Megan Gillies, Bea Gallardo-Lacourt, William E. Archer, Emma L. Spanswick, Notanee Bourassa, Martin Connors, Matthew Heavner, Brian Jackel, Burcu Kosar, David J. Knudsen, Chris Ratzlaff and Ian Schofield, “New science in plain sight: Citizen scientists lead to the discovery of optical structure in the upper atmosphere” Science Advances, vol.
  • Exors and the Stellar Birthline Mackenzie S

    Exors and the Stellar Birthline Mackenzie S

    A&A 600, A133 (2017) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201630196 & c ESO 2017 Astrophysics EXors and the stellar birthline Mackenzie S. L. Moody1 and Steven W. Stahler2 1 Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA e-mail: [email protected] 2 Astronomy Department, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA e-mail: [email protected] Received 6 December 2016 / Accepted 23 February 2017 ABSTRACT We assess the evolutionary status of EXors. These low-mass, pre-main-sequence stars repeatedly undergo sharp luminosity increases, each a year or so in duration. We place into the HR diagram all EXors that have documented quiescent luminosities and effective temperatures, and thus determine their masses and ages. Two alternate sets of pre-main-sequence tracks are used, and yield similar results. Roughly half of EXors are embedded objects, i.e., they appear observationally as Class I or flat-spectrum infrared sources. We find that these are relatively young and are located close to the stellar birthline in the HR diagram. Optically visible EXors, on the other hand, are situated well below the birthline. They have ages of several Myr, typical of classical T Tauri stars. Judging from the limited data at hand, we find no evidence that binarity companions trigger EXor eruptions; this issue merits further investigation. We draw several general conclusions. First, repetitive luminosity outbursts do not occur in all pre-main-sequence stars, and are not in themselves a sign of extreme youth. They persist, along with other signs of activity, in a relatively small subset of these objects.
  • 2008 Smithsonian Folklife Festival

    2008 Smithsonian Folklife Festival

    Smithsonian Folklife Festival records: 2008 Smithsonian Folklife Festival CFCH Staff 2017 Ralph Rinzler Folklife Archives and Collections Smithsonian Center for Folklife and Cultural Heritage 600 Maryland Ave SW Washington, D.C. [email protected] https://www.folklife.si.edu/archive/ Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Historical note.................................................................................................................. 2 Scope and Contents note................................................................................................ 2 Arrangement note............................................................................................................ 2 Introduction....................................................................................................................... 3 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 4 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 6 Series 1: Program Books, Festival Publications, and Ephemera, 2008................... 6 Series 2: Bhutan: Land of the Thunder Dragon....................................................... 7 Series 3: NASA: Fifty Years and Beyond.............................................................
  • Star Formation in the “Gulf of Mexico”

    Star Formation in the “Gulf of Mexico”

    A&A 528, A125 (2011) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912671 & c ESO 2011 Astrophysics Star formation in the “Gulf of Mexico” T. Armond1,, B. Reipurth2,J.Bally3, and C. Aspin2, 1 SOAR Telescope, Casilla 603, La Serena, Chile e-mail: [email protected] 2 Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 640 N. Aohoku Place, Hilo, HI 96720, USA e-mail: [reipurth;caa]@ifa.hawaii.edu 3 Center for Astrophysics and Space Astronomy, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA e-mail: [email protected] Received 9 June 2009 / Accepted 6 February 2011 ABSTRACT We present an optical/infrared study of the dense molecular cloud, L935, dubbed “The Gulf of Mexico”, which separates the North America and the Pelican nebulae, and we demonstrate that this area is a very active star forming region. A wide-field imaging study with interference filters has revealed 35 new Herbig-Haro objects in the Gulf of Mexico. A grism survey has identified 41 Hα emission- line stars, 30 of them new. A small cluster of partly embedded pre-main sequence stars is located around the known LkHα 185-189 group of stars, which includes the recently erupting FUor HBC 722. Key words. Herbig-Haro objects – stars: formation 1. Introduction In a grism survey of the W80 region, Herbig (1958) detected a population of Hα emission-line stars, LkHα 131–195, mostly The North America nebula (NGC 7000) and the adjacent Pelican T Tauri stars, including the little group LkHα 185 to 189 located nebula (IC 5070), both well known for the characteristic shapes within the dark lane of the Gulf of Mexico, thus demonstrating that have given rise to their names, are part of the single large that low-mass star formation has recently taken place here.
  • SXP 1062, a Young Be X-Ray Binary Pulsar with Long Spin Period⋆

    SXP 1062, a Young Be X-Ray Binary Pulsar with Long Spin Period⋆

    A&A 537, L1 (2012) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118369 & c ESO 2012 Astrophysics Letter to the Editor SXP 1062, a young Be X-ray binary pulsar with long spin period Implications for the neutron star birth spin F. Haberl1, R. Sturm1, M. D. Filipovic´2,W.Pietsch1, and E. J. Crawford2 1 Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik, Giessenbachstraße, 85748 Garching, Germany e-mail: [email protected] 2 University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South DC, NSW1797, Australia Received 31 October 2011 / Accepted 1 December 2011 ABSTRACT Context. The Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC) is ideally suited to investigating the recent star formation history from X-ray source population studies. It harbours a large number of Be/X-ray binaries (Be stars with an accreting neutron star as companion), and the supernova remnants can be easily resolved with imaging X-ray instruments. Aims. We search for new supernova remnants in the SMC and in particular for composite remnants with a central X-ray source. Methods. We study the morphology of newly found candidate supernova remnants using radio, optical and X-ray images and inves- tigate their X-ray spectra. Results. Here we report on the discovery of the new supernova remnant around the recently discovered Be/X-ray binary pulsar CXO J012745.97−733256.5 = SXP 1062 in radio and X-ray images. The Be/X-ray binary system is found near the centre of the supernova remnant, which is located at the outer edge of the eastern wing of the SMC. The remnant is oxygen-rich, indicating that it developed from a type Ib event.
  • Lunar and Planetary Information Bulletin No. 161 (July 2020)

    Lunar and Planetary Information Bulletin No. 161 (July 2020)

    THE DEEP SPACE NETWORK: NASA’s Link to the Solar System Featured Story | From the Desk of Lori Glaze | Meeting Highlights | News from Space | Spotlight on Education In Memoriam | Milestones | New and Noteworthy | Calendar LUNAR AND PLANETARY INFORMATION BULLETIN July 2020 Issue 161 FEATURED STORY THE DEEP SPACE NETWORK: NASA’s Link to the Solar System Note from the Editors: This issue’s lead article is the tenth in a series of reports describing the history and current activities of the planetary research facilities funded by NASA and located nationwide. This issue features the Deep Space Network, a worldwide network of spacecraft communication facilities that supports NASA’s interplanetary spacecraft missions. — Paul Schenk and Renée Dotson From Mercury to Pluto (and beyond) we tary robotic space missions. Other space system and ultimately, our place within it. have marveled at the stunning vistas agencies, such as Europe’s ESA and found throughout our solar system. Japan’s JAXA also use the DSN by coop- The forerunner of the DSN was estab- From the erupting volcanos on Io to the erative agreements. The DSN consists of lished in January, 1958, when the Jet glorious rings of Saturn, it is easy to three major facilities spaced equidistant Propulsion Laboratory, or JPL‚ then forget that we would never have an about from each other‚ approximately 120 under contract to the U.S. Army‚ degrees apart in longitude‚ around the deployed portable radio tracking stations but for one key global NASA facility, none world. These sites are at Goldstone, near in Nigeria, Singapore, and California.
  • The Birth and Evolution of Brown Dwarfs

    The Birth and Evolution of Brown Dwarfs

    The Birth and Evolution of Brown Dwarfs Tutorial for the CSPF, or should it be CSSF (Center for Stellar and Substellar Formation)? Eduardo L. Martin, IfA Outline • Basic definitions • Scenarios of Brown Dwarf Formation • Brown Dwarfs in Star Formation Regions • Brown Dwarfs around Stars and Brown Dwarfs • Final Remarks KumarKumar 1963; 1963; D’Antona D’Antona & & Mazzitelli Mazzitelli 1995; 1995; Stevenson Stevenson 1991, 1991, Chabrier Chabrier & & Baraffe Baraffe 2000 2000 Mass • A brown dwarf is defined primarily by its mass, irrespective of how it forms. • The low-mass limit of a star, and the high-mass limit of a brown dwarf, correspond to the minimum mass for stable Hydrogen burning. • The HBMM depends on chemical composition and rotation. For solar abundances and no rotation the HBMM=0.075MSun=79MJupiter. • The lower limit of a brown dwarf mass could be at the DBMM=0.012MSun=13MJupiter. SaumonSaumon et et al. al. 1996 1996 Central Temperature • The central temperature of brown dwarfs ceases to increase when electron degeneracy becomes dominant. Further contraction induces cooling rather than heating. • The LiBMM is at 0.06MSun • Brown dwarfs can have unstable nuclear reactions. Radius • The radii of brown dwarfs is dominated by the EOS (classical ionic Coulomb pressure + partial degeneracy of e-). • The mass-radius relationship is smooth -1/8 R=R0m . • Brown dwarfs and planets have similar sizes. Thermal Properties • Arrows indicate H2 formation near the atmosphere. Molecular recombination favors convective instability. • Brown dwarfs are ultracool, fully convective, objects. • The temperatures of brown dwarfs can overlap with those of stars and planets. Density • Brown dwarfs and planets (substellar-mass objects) become denser and cooler with time, when degeneracy dominates.
  • Paul Hertz NASA Town Hall with Bonus Material

    Paul Hertz NASA Town Hall with Bonus Material

    Paul Hertz Dominic Benford Felicia Chou Valerie Connaughton Lucien Cox Jeanne Davis Kristen Erickson Daniel Evans Michael Garcia Ellen Gertsen Shahid Habib Hashima Hasan Douglas Hudgins Patricia Knezek Elizabeth Landau William Latter Michael New Mario Perez Gregory Robinson Rita Sambruna Evan Scannapieco Kartik Sheth Eric Smith Eric Tollestrup NASA Town Hall with bonus material AAS 235th Meeting | January 5, 2020 Paul Hertz Director, Astrophysics Division Science Mission Directorate @PHertzNASA Posted at http://science.nasa.gov/astrophysics/documents 1 2 Spitzer 8/25/2003 Formulation + SMEX/MO (2025), Implementation MIDEX/MO (2028), etc. Primary Ops ] Extended Ops SXG (RSA) 7/13/2019 Webb Euclid (ESA) 2021 WFIRST 2022 Mid 2020s Ariel (ESA) 2028 XMM-Newton Chandra (ESA) TESS 7/23/1999 12/10/1999 4/18/2018 NuSTAR 6/13/2012 Fermi IXPE Swift 6/11/2008 2021 11/20/2004 XRISM (JAXA) SPHEREx 2022 2023 Hubble ISS-NICER GUSTO 4/24/1990 6/3/2017 2021 SOFIA Full Ops 5/2014 + Athena (early 2030s), Revised November 24, 2019 LISA4 (early 2030s) Outline • Celebrate Accomplishments § Mission Milestones • Committed to Improving § Building an Excellent Workforce § Research and Analysis Initiatives • Program Update § Research & Analysis, Technology, Fellowships § ROSES-2020 Preview • Missions Update § Operating Missions and Senior Review § Webb, WFIRST § Other missions • Planning for the Future § FY20 Budget § Project Artemis § Supporting Astro2020 § Creating the Future 5 NASA Astrophysics Celebrate Accomplishments https://www.nasa.gov/2019 7 NASA Astrophysics
  • Issue 105, February 2006

    Issue 105, February 2006

    GGOINGOING TOTO PPLUTOLUTO:: TTHEHE NNEWEW HHORIZONSORIZONS MMISSIONISSION — Paul Schenk, Lunar and Planetary Institute Fastest man-made object to leave Earth. Fastest flight past the Moon’s orbit. It was a day of superlatives, but it didn’t come easy for those watching. Going back to 1992, there have been at least three attempts to begin building a spacecraft to go to Pluto, the “last” unexplored planet. Only in 2001 was a team and mission chosen that would finally make it past the hurdles of Congress, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and NASA management. Once the process finally began, it took only five years from the call for mission proposals to launch day. Once on the launch pad, things went relatively smoothly until launch day itself, originally set for January 10 but then pushed back until January 17. Although involved with NASA for more than 20 years now, I had never personally witnessed a launch. We arrived at Kennedy Space Center early on the 17th, as directed, and waited outside to the music of 2001 — A Space Odyssey and a recording of the voice of Neil Armstrong walking on the Moon. We met many of our friends from the team, and together we boarded the fleet of buses to the viewing area. It was warm but windy, a bad omen. The launch window was only three hours long and peak winds kept exceeding the tolerable limits for launch. Every 15 minutes or so the launch commentator announced that the launch time was being pushed back again in hopes the winds would subside.
  • Chapter 1 a Theoretical and Observational Overview of Brown

    Chapter 1 a Theoretical and Observational Overview of Brown

    Chapter 1 A theoretical and observational overview of brown dwarfs Stars are large spheres of gas composed of 73 % of hydrogen in mass, 25 % of helium, and about 2 % of metals, elements with atomic number larger than two like oxygen, nitrogen, carbon or iron. The core temperature and pressure are high enough to convert hydrogen into helium by the proton-proton cycle of nuclear reaction yielding sufficient energy to prevent the star from gravitational collapse. The increased number of helium atoms yields a decrease of the central pressure and temperature. The inner region is thus compressed under the gravitational pressure which dominates the nuclear pressure. This increase in density generates higher temperatures, making nuclear reactions more efficient. The consequence of this feedback cycle is that a star such as the Sun spend most of its lifetime on the main-sequence. The most important parameter of a star is its mass because it determines its luminosity, ef- fective temperature, radius, and lifetime. The distribution of stars with mass, known as the Initial Mass Function (hereafter IMF), is therefore of prime importance to understand star formation pro- cesses, including the conversion of interstellar matter into stars and back again. A major issue regarding the IMF concerns its universality, i.e. whether the IMF is constant in time, place, and metallicity. When a solar-metallicity star reaches a mass below 0.072 M ¡ (Baraffe et al. 1998), the core temperature and pressure are too low to burn hydrogen stably. Objects below this mass were originally termed “black dwarfs” because the low-luminosity would hamper their detection (Ku- mar 1963).
  • The UV Perspective of Low-Mass Star Formation

    The UV Perspective of Low-Mass Star Formation

    galaxies Review The UV Perspective of Low-Mass Star Formation P. Christian Schneider 1,* , H. Moritz Günther 2 and Kevin France 3 1 Hamburger Sternwarte, University of Hamburg, 21029 Hamburg, Germany 2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research; Cambridge, MA 02109, USA; [email protected] 3 Department of Astrophysical and Planetary Sciences Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, University of Colorado, Denver, CO 80203, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 16 January 2020; Accepted: 29 February 2020; Published: 21 March 2020 Abstract: The formation of low-mass (M? . 2 M ) stars in molecular clouds involves accretion disks and jets, which are of broad astrophysical interest. Accreting stars represent the closest examples of these phenomena. Star and planet formation are also intimately connected, setting the starting point for planetary systems like our own. The ultraviolet (UV) spectral range is particularly suited for studying star formation, because virtually all relevant processes radiate at temperatures associated with UV emission processes or have strong observational signatures in the UV range. In this review, we describe how UV observations provide unique diagnostics for the accretion process, the physical properties of the protoplanetary disk, and jets and outflows. Keywords: star formation; ultraviolet; low-mass stars 1. Introduction Stars form in molecular clouds. When these clouds fragment, localized cloud regions collapse into groups of protostars. Stars with final masses between 0.08 M and 2 M , broadly the progenitors of Sun-like stars, start as cores deeply embedded in a dusty envelope, where they can be seen only in the sub-mm and far-IR spectral windows (so-called class 0 sources).
  • The FIRST STARS in the UNIVERSE WERE TYPICALLY MANY TIMES More Massive and Luminous Than the Sun

    The FIRST STARS in the UNIVERSE WERE TYPICALLY MANY TIMES More Massive and Luminous Than the Sun

    THEFIRST STARS IN THE UNIVERSE Exceptionally massive and bright, the earliest stars changed the course of cosmic history We live in a universe that is full of bright objects. On a clear night one can see thousands of stars with the naked eye. These stars occupy mere- ly a small nearby part of the Milky Way galaxy; tele- scopes reveal a much vaster realm that shines with the light from billions of galaxies. According to our current understanding of cosmology, howev- er, the universe was featureless and dark for a long stretch of its early history. The first stars did not appear until perhaps 100 million years after the big bang, and nearly a billion years passed before galaxies proliferated across the cosmos. Astron- BY RICHARD B. LARSON AND VOLKER BROMM omers have long wondered: How did this dramat- ILLUSTRATIONS BY DON DIXON ic transition from darkness to light come about? 4 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN Updated from the December 2001 issue COPYRIGHT 2004 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, INC. EARLIEST COSMIC STRUCTURE mmostost likely took the form of a network of filaments. The first protogalaxies, small-scale systems about 30 to 100 light-years across, coalesced at the nodes of this network. Inside the protogalaxies, the denser regions of gas collapsed to form the first stars (inset). COPYRIGHT 2004 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, INC. After decades of study, researchers The Dark Ages to longer wavelengths and the universe have recently made great strides toward THE STUDY of the early universe is grew increasingly cold and dark. As- answering this question. Using sophisti- hampered by a lack of direct observa- tronomers have no observations of this cated computer simulation techniques, tions.