DOCSLIB.ORG

Paleocene Foraminifera of the Gulf Coastal Region of the United States and Adjacent Areas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Paleocene Foraminifera of the Gulf Coastal Region of the United States and Adjacent Areas Paleocene Foraminifera of the Gulf Coastal Region of the United States and Adjacent Areas By JOSEPH A. CUSHMAN GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 232 Descriptions and illustrations of smaller Foraminifera from the Gulf Coastal Region, Cuba, Central America, Haiti, and Trinidad UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1951 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Oscar L. Chapman, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. - Price $1.75 (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Page Abstract______--------------------_-----__----_-___ 1 Systematic descriptions—Continued Introduction.___--_----___-________________-______- 1 Lagenidae _____________________-_____---------_ 13 List of loealities____-----------_-_-_-_-_-__--_-_-_-_ 1 Polymorphinidae-__-________--_-_------—— ____ 32 Systematic descriptions____-__-_-_-___-_-___.-____-_- 3 Nonionidae-___————————— ----- ———— ______ 37 Rhizamminidae_______-_-._--- —— -._ — ___ 3 Heterohelicidae___._ —.._- — _ — — _ — — — 37 Ammodiscidae-,—- — ---- — — _ — — ____ 4 Buliminidae————--_-- — — — — — — — 39 T ., ... Ellipsoidimdae.-------------------------------- 45 Lituohdae__-__--------------_-------------_--- 4 ,, /..., ,_ _ , .., _ Rotaliidae____--_------_----_------------------ 47 Textulariidae—-— — __ — ___ — — — — — - 5 Amphisteginidae—— — — — — — — — — — — 56 Verneuilinidae— ______________ __ _ __________ 8 CM_idulinidae_____ _________ __._...._ — ... — _. 56 Valvulinidae__------------_-_-_____-___---__--- 9 Chilostomellidae— _____________________________ 58 Miliolidae-—---------------------------------- 10 Globigerinidae—------------------------------- 60 Ophthalmidiidae.-- _________________ ——________ 12 Globorotaliidae-_-_ ___--_ ____________________ 61 Trochamminidae- _______________________________ 12 Anomalinidae __________-______--_-__-------_--- 62 Placopsilinidae __--_-_-_-_--_---___-_-__-_-_____ 12 Index.________________________-_---_____-_---_---_ 69 ILLUSTRATIONS PLATE 1. Rhizamminidae, Ammodiscidae, Lituolidae, Textulariidae_________________________________________ Following index 2. Textulariidae, Verneuilinidae, Valvulinidae, Miliolidae__________________________________________ d^ 3. Miliolidae, Ophthalmidiidae, Trochamminidae, Placopsilinidae, Lagenidae__________________________ do 4-8. Lagenidae__________________________________________________________________________________ do 9. Lagenidae, Polymorphinidae, Buliminidae_____________________________________________________ do 10. Polymorphinidae-___________________________________________________________________________ do 11. Nonionidae, Heterohelicidae, Buliminidae---___________________________________________________ do 12. Buliminidae, Ellipsoidinidae-__________________________________________________________________ do 13. Lagenidae, Ellipsoidinidae, Rotaliidae__________________________________________________________ do 14-15. Rotaliidae._________________________________________________________________________________ do 16. Rotaliidae, Cassidulinidae, Chilostomellidae_____________________________________________________ do 17. Chilostomellidae, Globigerinidae, Globorotaliidae, Anomalinidae______-__-_____-_______-L-_______-_ do 18-19. Anomalinidae-______________________________________________________________________________ do- 20. Rotaliidae, Anomalinidae-____________________________________________________________________ do 21. Valvulinidae, Lagenidae, Anomalinidae___-________-_______________________________________-___- do 22. Anomalinidae-_________________________________-______________--____•______________-_______-- do 23. Rotaliidae, Anomalinidae-_____________-______________ v __________-_____-_____-________________ do 24. Rotaliidae, Cassidulinidae, Globorotaliidae_-_-_-_______________-_________________-_____.________ do TABLES Page TABLE 1. Distribution of Paleocene Rhizamminidae, Ammodiscidae, Lituolidae, Textulariidae, Verneuilinidae, Miliolida-?, Ophthalmidiidae, Trochamminidae, and Placopsilinidae__ _______________________________________________ 12 2. Distribution of Paleocene Lagenidae__________________________________________________________________.._ 28 3. Distribution of Paleocene Polymorphinidae, Nonionidae, Heterohelicidae, Buliminidae, and EUipsoidinidae____. _ 44 4. Distribution of Paleocene Rotaliidae, Amphisteginidae, Cassidulinidae, Chilostomellidae, Globigerinidae, Globoro­ taliidae, and Anomalinidae--_________________________________________________________________________ 60 m PALEOCENE FORAMINIFERA OF THE GULF COASTAL REGION OF THE UNITED STATES AND ADJACENT AREAS By JOSEPH A. CUSIIMAN l ABSTRACT U. S. National Museum, have added much to the faunas This paper describes and figures the Foraminifera from the from Arkansas. Paleocene of the Gulf Coastal Plain of the United States. The I wish to express my thanks to the many persons who- collections are largely from Texas, Arkansas, Mississippi, Ala­ have collected material at my suggestion, to I ~. John, bama, and Tennessee. Records from related areas of Trinidad, B. Reeside, Jr., for his help as chief of the Paleontology Cuba, Haiti, and Central America are also included. Many of and Stratigraphy Branch, and to Miss Ruth Todd f OF the species are excellent index fossils for study of the Paleocene. About 280 species and varieties are recorded and nearly all are her careful work in helping to prepare material, typing,, illustrated. and in publishing several joint papers which have; added to the known faunas. INTRODUCTION Some controversy exists as to what fossil material LIST OF LOCALITIES 2 should be included in the Paleocene. In this report, ALABAMA well samples from Florida have been left out where the PORTERS CREEK FORMATION, MATTHEWS LANDING MARL. distribution of the species indicates latest Cretaceous MEMBER rather than Paleocene age. Likewise, outcrop samples were left out where late Cretaceous species of Foraminif­ 1. Road cut on east slope to a branch in SW 14 sec- era, evidently redeposited, were associated with mega- 12, T. 11 N., R. 9 E., Wilcox County, Air, F. S, fossils that definitely indicate Paleocene age. In the MacNeil. situation of well samples where the only fossils present 2. Road cut just south of Dixoii Creek, sec. 23, T. 13 are Foraminifera the age relations may also be ob­ N., R. 6. E., Wilcox County, Ala, F. S. I lacNeiL scured by the presence of redeposited fossils. To make 3. Foot of hill on south slope to Wolf Creek, probably the fauna more nearly complete, records from the West in SE^NE^ sec. 20, T. 11 N., R. 12 E, Butler Indies region and Central America have been included. County, Ala. F. S. MacNeil. Although many of the species of Foraminifera in the 4. On Alabama Highway 96, 10.2 miles northeast of Paleocene are found also in the Upper Cretaceous and Kimbrough, Wilcox County, Ala. C. G. Lalicker. numerous others extend upward into the Wilcox group 5. On Alabama Highway 96, 9.2 miles northeast of of the Eocene, many species remain that are excellent Kimbrough, Wilcox County, Ala. C. G. Lalicker. index fossils for the Paleocene. Many of these are 6. North part of sec. 12, T. 12 N., R. 6 E., at Matthews very striking in their characters and should not be Landing, 9 miles west and 2 miles north of Cam- confused with species from other series or formations. den, Wilcox County, Ala. C. G. Laliclrer. The work by Mrs. Helen JTeaime Plummer "Foram­ 7. Naheola Landing on Tombigbee River, Choctaw inifera of the Midway formation in Texas" (Texas County, Ala. T. W. Vaughan. U. S. G. S. 5647. Univ. Bull 2644, 1926 (1927), pp. 1-206, pis. 1-15, text NAHEOLA FORMATION, COAL BLUFF MARL MEMBER figs. 1-13, table) is the pioneer work on this group. Later papers have been published on the Paleocene of 8. Creek bottom just west of the intersection of Cale­ other regions which have added much to the original donia, about 14 mile south of the center of sec. fauna and undoubtedly many more species will be found 29, T. 11 N., R. 10 E., Wilcox County, Ala. F. S. as work progresses in different regions. MacNeil. Many members of the U. S. Geological Survey have CLAYTON FORMATION, CHALYBEATE LIMESTONE MEMBER very kindly collected material for this work and a num­ ber of others have helped much. Their names will be 9. Chalk overlying Ostrea pulaskensis zone, U. S. found in the list of localities given here. Also, the Highway 80, south of Sucarnoochee Creek, y2 collections of Dr. W. H. Deaderick, bequeathed to the mile southwest of Livingston, Sumter County, Ala. L. W. Stephenson and W. H. Mor roe. 1 This report was received March 2, 1949. The author died on April 16, 1949. Its editorial preparation for publication has involved no sub­ 3 The localities are referred to by number in the individual descriptions stantial changes from the text as left by the author. and in the faunal tables. PALEOCENE FORAMINHFERA OP GULF COASTAL REGION CLAYTON FORMATION. ( HORIZON=BASE OF PORTERS CREEK of the SE14SW1/4SW1/4 sec. 11, T. 2 S., R. 15 W. CLAY OF WESTERN ALA.) Coll. first by R. A. Schmidt and J. A. Gardner. Additional material collected by M. Gordon and 10. Glauconite bed 1 to iy2 feet thick between hard M. W. Ellis. Midway loc. 4. limestone of the Clayton formation and overlying 20. West bank of Trace Creek, SEV4SY^V4 sec. 30, T. 2 fullers earth. Old fullers earth mine, sec. 23, S., R, 15 W., Saline County, Ark CoU. first by T. 10 N., R. 25 E., just east of Pratts, Barbour R. A. Schmidt and J. A. Gardner. Additional County, Ala.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chronology, Causes and Progression of the Messinian Salinity Crisis
    letters to nature the cause, and the effects, of the isolation of the Mediterranean; the two basic explanations are (1) a large glacio-eustatic sea-level drop, Chronology, causes and related to expanding polar ice volume6, and (2) orogenic uplift accompanied by gravity-driven sliding of large nappe complexes in progression of the the Gibraltar arc7. Until now, correlations of stable-isotope (d18O and d13C) records from open-ocean sequences to the Messinian Messinian salinity crisis event stratigraphy of the Mediterranean have been ambiguous because of the absence of a reliable time frame for the MSC. The W. Krijgsman*, F. J. Hilgen², I. Raf®³, F. J. Sierro§ establishment of astronomical polarity timescales for the past & D. S. Wilsonk 10 Myr (refs 3, 11) provided a signi®cant advance in dating the * Paleomagnetic Laboratory ``Fort Hoofddijk'', Utrecht University, geological record and promised a solution for the MSC controver- Budapestlaan 17, 3584 CD Utrecht, The Netherlands sies. Unfortunately, the Mediterranean-based astronomical polarity ² Department of Geology, Utrecht University, Budapestlaan 4, 3584 CD Utrecht, timescale showed a gap during much of the Messinian (6.7±5.3 Myr The Netherlands ago)3, related to the presence of less-favourable sediments and the ³ Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, UniversitaÁ ``G. D'Annunzio'', notoriously complex geological history of the Mediterranean in Campus Universitario, Via dei Vestini 31, 66013 Chieti Scalo, Italy this time interval. However, the classic Messinian sediments § Department de
    [Show full text]
  • From the Gulf of Alaska and Southeastern Alaska
    Recent Foraminifera From the Gulf of Alaska And Southeastern Alaska By RUTH TODD and DORIS LOW CONTRIBUTIONS TO PALEONTOLOGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 573-A A study resulting from a search for evidence that Pamplona Searidge is the foundered remnant of the 18th century "Pamplona Rock" UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1967 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 55 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page A18 18 2 1 21 2 1 2 5 26 3 0 31 3 3 34 3 5 35 36 38 38 38 39 39 39 4 0 4 3 ILLUSTRATIONS [Plates 1-5 follow index] PLATE 1. Recent arenaceous Foraminifera from Alaska. 2. Recent arenaceous and porcellaneous Foraminifera from Alaska. 3. Recent Lagenidae, Polymorphinidae, and Buliminidae from Alaska. 4. Recent Buliminidae, Elphidiidae, Discorbidae, and Rotaliidae from Alaska. 5. Recent miscellaneous benthonic and planktonic Foraminifera from Alaska. FIGURE1. Map of Gldf of Alaska and southeastern Alaska showing locution of dredged samples- _._ _ _ A3 TABLES Page TABLE1. List of stations and locality data for Foraminifera samples- _ _._ _ _ _ . A2 2. Distribution and abundance of Iiecent Foraminifera off Alaska. _._ _. - _ _ 4 CONTRIBUTIONS TO PALEONTOLOGY RECENT FORAMINIFERA FROM THE GULF OF ALASKA AND SOUTHEASTERN ALASKA By RUTHTODD and DORISLOW ABSTRACT / In each of these places numerous species were found in common Pamplona Searidge is a northeast-trending submarine ridge, with the present assemblages.
    [Show full text]
  • TRAVERTINE-MARL DEPOSITS of the VALLEY and RIDGE PROVINCE of VIRGINIA - a PRELIMINARY REPORT David A
    - Vol. 31 February 1985 No. 1 TRAVERTINE-MARL DEPOSITS OF THE VALLEY AND RIDGE PROVINCE OF VIRGINIA - A PRELIMINARY REPORT David A. Hubbard, Jr.1, William F. Gianninil and Michelle M. Lorah2 The travertine and marl deposits of Virginia's Valley and Ridge province are the result of precipitation of calcium carbonate from fresh water streams and springs. Travertine is white to light yellowish brown and has a massive or concretionary structure. Buildups of this material tend to form cascades or waterfalls along streams (Figure 1). Marl refers to white to dark yellowish brown, loose, earthy deposits of calcium carbonate (Figure 2). Deposits of these carbonate materials are related and have formed during the Quaternary period. This preliminary report is a compilation of some litei-ature and observations of these materials. A depositional model is proposed. These deposits have long been visited by man. Projectile points, pottery fragments, and firepits record the visitation of American Indians to Frederick and Augusta county sites. Thomas Jefferson (1825) wrote an account of the Falling Spring Falls from a visit prior to 1781. Aesthetic and economic considerations eontinue to attract interest in these deposits. 'Virginia Division of Mineral Resources, Charlot- Figure 1. Travertine waterfall and cascade series tesville, VA on Falling Springs Creek, Alleghany County, 2Department of Environmental Sciences, Univer- Virginia. Note man standing in center of left sity of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA margin. 2 VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES Vol. 31 Figure 2. An extensive marl deposit located in Figure 3. Rimstone dam form resulting from Frederick County, Virginia. Stream, in fore- precipitation of calcium carbonate in Mill Creek, ground, has incised and drained the deposit.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Benthic Foraminifera from the Itaipu Lagoon, Rio De Janeiro (Southeastern Brazil)
    12 5 1959 the journal of biodiversity data 15 September 2016 Check List LISTS OF SPECIES Check List 12(5): 1959, 15 September 2016 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15560/12.5.1959 ISSN 1809-127X © 2016 Check List and Authors Recent benthic foraminifera from the Itaipu Lagoon, Rio de Janeiro (southeastern Brazil) Débora Raposo1*, Vanessa Laut2, Iara Clemente3, Virginia Martins3, Fabrizio Frontalini4, Frederico Silva5, Maria Lúcia Lorini6, Rafael Fortes6 and Lazaro Laut1 1 Laboratório de Micropaleontologia (LabMicro), Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro – UNIRIO. Avenida Pasteur 458, Urca, Rio de Janeiro, CEP 22290-240, RJ, Brazil 2 Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), Instituto de Biologia Marinha, Outeiro São João Batista, s/nº, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, CEP 24001-970, RJ, Brazil 3 Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ). Rua São Francisco Xavier, 524, Maracanã, Rio de Janeiro, CEP 20550-900, RJ, Brazil 4 DiSTeVA, Università degli Studi di Urbino “Carlo Bo”, Campus Scientifico Enrico Mattei. Località Crocicchia, 61029 Urbino, Italy 5 Laboratório de Palinofácies e Fácies Orgânicas (LAFO), Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ). Avenida Pedro Calmon, 550, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, CEP 21941-901, RJ, Brazil 6 Laboratório de Ecologia Bêntica, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro – UNIRIO. Avenida Pasteur 458, Urca, Rio de Janeiro, CEP 22290-240, RJ, Brazil * Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Itaipu Lagoon is located near the mouth of There are many advantages of applying foraminifera Guanabara Bay and has great importance for recreation to environmental monitoring when compared with to the city of Niterói, Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent and Quaternary Foraminifera Collected Around New Caledonia
    Plates 6/1 & 6/2 Recent and Quaternary foraminifera collected around New Caledonia Jean-Pierre DEBENAY 1 & Guy CABIOCH 2 1 UPRES EA, Universite d'Angers, 2 Bd Lavoisiere, 49045, Angers cedex, France 2 Institut de Recherche pour Developpement, UR 055, Paliotropique, Centre IRD, BPA5, 98848 Noumea cedex, Nouvelle-Caledonie [email protected] Abstract The compilation of the works carried out on Recent and Quaternary foraminifera collected in the waters surrounding New Caledonia allowed us to identify 574 species. These species are listed according to the classification of Loeblish & Tappan (1988), updated for the Recent species by Debenay et al. (1996). Their affinity with microfaunas from other regions is briefly discussed. Resume La compilation des travaux sur les foramini:feres actuels et quaternaires recoltes dans les eaux entourant la Nouvelle-Caledonie nous a permis de repertorier 574 especes. Ces especes sont presen­ tees selon la classification de Loeblish & Tappan (1988), mise ajour pour les especes actuelles par Debenay et al. (1996). Leur affinite avec les microfaunes d'autres regions est discutee brievement. Introduction The first study about foraminifera from the southwestern Pacific near New Caledonia was carried out by Brady (1884) during the voyage of H.M.S. Challenger (1873-1876), updated by Barker (1960), The nearest station was station 177, near Vanuatu (16°45'S-168°5'E). However, studies concerning directly New Caledonia began much later, with partial and local inventories in coastal samples (Gambini,1958, 1959; Renaud-Debyser, 1965; Toulouse, 1965, 1966). Samples of recent and fossil sediments collected during the Singer-Polignac mission (1960-1965) were further used for several studies of foraminiferal assemblages (Coudray & Margerel, 1974; Coudray, 1976; Margerel, 1981).
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist, Assemblage Composition, and Biogeographic Assessment of Recent Benthic Foraminifera (Protista, Rhizaria) from São Vincente, Cape Verdes
    Zootaxa 4731 (2): 151–192 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2020 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4731.2.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:560FF002-DB8B-405A-8767-09628AEDBF04 Checklist, assemblage composition, and biogeographic assessment of Recent benthic foraminifera (Protista, Rhizaria) from São Vincente, Cape Verdes JOACHIM SCHÖNFELD1,3 & JULIA LÜBBERS2 1GEOMAR Helmholtz-Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Wischhofstrasse 1-3, 24148 Kiel, Germany 2Institute of Geosciences, Christian-Albrechts-University, Ludewig-Meyn-Straße 14, 24118 Kiel, Germany 3Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract We describe for the first time subtropical intertidal foraminiferal assemblages from beach sands on São Vincente, Cape Verdes. Sixty-five benthic foraminiferal species were recognised, representing 47 genera, 31 families, and 8 superfamilies. Endemic species were not recognised. The new checklist largely extends an earlier record of nine benthic foraminiferal species from fossil carbonate sands on the island. Bolivina striatula, Rosalina vilardeboana and Millettiana milletti dominated the living (rose Bengal stained) fauna, while Elphidium crispum, Amphistegina gibbosa, Quinqueloculina seminulum, Ammonia tepida, Triloculina rotunda and Glabratella patelliformis dominated the dead assemblages. The living fauna lacks species typical for coarse-grained substrates. Instead, there were species that had a planktonic stage in their life cycle. The living fauna therefore received a substantial contribution of floating species and propagules that may have endured a long transport by surface ocean currents. The dead assemblages largely differed from the living fauna and contained redeposited tests deriving from a rhodolith-mollusc carbonate facies at <20 m water depth.
    [Show full text]
  • Foraminifera from Exmouth Gulf, Western Australia
    JournalJournal of ofthe the Royal Royal Society Society of ofWestern Western Australia, Australia, 80(4), 80:263-280, December 1997 1997 Foraminifera from Exmouth Gulf, Western Australia D W Haig Department of Geology & Geophysics, University of Western Australia, Nedlands WA 6907 email: [email protected] Manuscript received January 1997; accepted September 1997. Abstract Two hundred and thirty-six benthonic species and six planktonic species are identified among Foraminifera present in Holocene sediment of Exmouth Gulf, in a water depth of 5-30 m. The benthonic microfauna comprises 20 agglutinated species (including 9 Lituolida, 1 Trochamminida, and 10 Textulariida), 74 porcellaneous species (Miliolida), and 142 hyaline species (including 4 Spirillinida, 27 Lagenida, 37 Buliminida, and 75 Rotaliida). Abundant species, at least at one site, include Ammotium australiensis, Textularia foliacea, Textularia lateralis, and Textularia oceanica among the agglutinated types; Parahauerinoides fragilissimus, Peneroplis pertusus, Planispirinella exigua, Pseudomassilina australis, Quinqueloculina arenata, Q. philippinensis, Q. sp 8, Sigmoihauerina involuta, Sorites marginalis, Triloculina tricarinata among the porcellaneous species; and Ammonia parkinsoniana, Amphistegina lessonii, A. sp cf A. papillosa, A. radiata, Asterorotalia gaimardi, Cibicides sp cf C. refulgens, Discorbinoides patelliformis, Elphidium sp cf E. advenum, E. crispum, E. sp 1, Heterostegina depressa, Operculina ammonoides, Pararotalia nipponica, and Rosalina cosymbosella among the hyaline (Rotaliida) species. Introduction The purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehen- sive record of the foraminiferal species present in Holocene There are no comprehensive published records of sediment in Exmouth Gulf, a major embayment on the foraminiferal faunas from inner neritic environments central north-west coast of Western Australia (Figs 1, 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Schmitz, M. D. 2000. Appendix 2: Radioisotopic Ages Used In
    Appendix 2 Radioisotopic ages used in GTS2020 M.D. SCHMITZ 1285 1286 Appendix 2 GTS GTS Sample Locality Lat-Long Lithostratigraphy Age 6 2s 6 2s Age Type 2020 2012 (Ma) analytical total ID ID Period Epoch Age Quaternary À not compiled Neogene À not compiled Pliocene Miocene Paleogene Oligocene Chattian Pg36 biotite-rich layer; PAC- Pieve d’Accinelli section, 43 35040.41vN, Scaglia Cinerea Fm, 42.3 m above base of 26.57 0.02 0.04 206Pb/238U B2 northeastern Apennines, Italy 12 29034.16vE section Rupelian Pg35 Pg20 biotite-rich layer; MCA- Monte Cagnero section (Chattian 43 38047.81vN, Scaglia Cinerea Fm, 145.8 m above base 31.41 0.03 0.04 206Pb/238U 145.8, equivalent to GSSP), northeastern Apennines, Italy 12 28003.83vE of section MCA/84-3 Pg34 biotite-rich layer; MCA- Monte Cagnero section (Chattian 43 38047.81vN, Scaglia Cinerea Fm, 142.8 m above base 31.72 0.02 0.04 206Pb/238U 142.8 GSSP), northeastern Apennines, Italy 12 28003.83vE of section Eocene Priabonian Pg33 Pg19 biotite-rich layer; MASS- Massignano (Oligocene GSSP), near 43.5328 N, Scaglia Cinerea Fm, 14.7 m above base of 34.50 0.04 0.05 206Pb/238U 14.7, equivalent to Ancona, northeastern Apennines, 13.6011 E section MAS/86-14.7 Italy Pg32 biotite-rich layer; MASS- Massignano (Oligocene GSSP), near 43.5328 N, Scaglia Cinerea Fm, 12.9 m above base of 34.68 0.04 0.06 206Pb/238U 12.9 Ancona, northeastern Apennines, 13.6011 E section Italy Pg31 Pg18 biotite-rich layer; MASS- Massignano (Oligocene GSSP), near 43.5328 N, Scaglia Cinerea Fm, 12.7 m above base of 34.72 0.02 0.04 206Pb/238U
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Foraminifera of the Marshall Islands
    Recent Foraminifera of the Marshall Islands Bikini and Nearby Atolls, Part 2, Oceanography (Biologic) GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 260-H ERRATA SLIP FOR PROFESSIONAL PAPER 260-H In the distribution tables (1-5) italic numbers indicate abundance of the species in percentages of the Foraminifera present in the sample. Arabic numbers indicate actual count of specimens. Recent Foraminifera of the Marshall Islands By JOSEPH A. CUSHMAN, RUTH TODD, and RITA J. POST Bikini and Nearby Atolls, Part 2, Oceanography (Biologic) GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 260-H UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1954 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Douglas McKay, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. - Price $1.75 (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Page ______.____-_-__-____-___-.-..______.____ 319 Systematic descriptions—Continued Introduction- ______---_-____--__-__-_-____-____--__ 319 Trochamminidae. _______________________________ 342 General features_____----------_--_-_-__-________^__ 319 Lagenidae _____________________________________ 342 Fauna of reef flats.__.--________-_-___._________ 319 Polymorphinidae_ ________-_-_-_----_--_-_-_-_-_ 344 Fauna of lagoons_______________________________ 320 Nonionidae_ __-__________________---_-----_---_ 345 Fauna of outer slopes. __.-_.____-_-_. ___________ 321 Camerinidae ___________________________________ 346 Fauna of deep water. ___________________________ 321 Peneroplidae___________________________________ 348 Sylvania Guyot core.______________^___-____ 322 Alveolinellidae________________________________ 348 Species restricted to guyot-__.___-_-.-_______ 322 Heterohelicidae- ________________________________ 349 Nondiagnostic species._________----_-__^________ 323 Buliminidae_- _ _________-_______-_-__--_--___--_ 349 Notes on distribution by families.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resources of the Illinois Basin in the Context of Basin Evolution
    Mineral Resources of the Illinois Basin in the Context of Basin Evolution St. Louis, Missouri, January 22-23,1992 Program and Abstracts Edited by Martin B. Goldhaber and J. James Eidel U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 92-1 This report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey, Illinois State Geological Survey, Kentucky Geological Survey, Missouri Division of Geology and Land Survey, and Indiana Geological Survey standards. PREFACE The mineral resources of the U.S. midcontinent were instrumental to the development of the U.S. economy. Mineral resources are an important and essential component of the current economy and will continue to play a vital role in the future. Mineral resources provide essential raw materials for the goods consumed by industry and the public. To assess the availability of mineral resources and contribute to the abib'ty to locate and define mineral resources, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) has undertaken two programs in cooperation with the State Geological Surveys in the midcontinent region. In 1975, under the Conterminous U.S. Mineral Assessment Program (CUSMAP) work began on the Rolla 1° X 2° Quadrangle at a scale of 1:250,000 and was continued in the adjacent Springfield, Harrison, Joplin, and Paducah quadrangles across southern Missouri, Kansas, Illinois, Arkansas, and Oklahoma. Public meetings were held in 1981 to present results from the Rolla CUSMAP and in 1985 for the Springfield CUSMAP. In 1984, the Midcontinent Strategic and Critical Minerals Project (SCMP) was initiated by the USGS and the State Geological Surveys of 16 states to map and compile data at 1:1,000,000 scale and conduct related topical studies for the area from latitude 36° to 46° N.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 629 – Glossary of Landform and Geologic Terms
    Title 430 – National Soil Survey Handbook Part 629 – Glossary of Landform and Geologic Terms Subpart A – General Information 629.0 Definition and Purpose This glossary provides the NCSS soil survey program, soil scientists, and natural resource specialists with landform, geologic, and related terms and their definitions to— (1) Improve soil landscape description with a standard, single source landform and geologic glossary. (2) Enhance geomorphic content and clarity of soil map unit descriptions by use of accurate, defined terms. (3) Establish consistent geomorphic term usage in soil science and the National Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS). (4) Provide standard geomorphic definitions for databases and soil survey technical publications. (5) Train soil scientists and related professionals in soils as landscape and geomorphic entities. 629.1 Responsibilities This glossary serves as the official NCSS reference for landform, geologic, and related terms. The staff of the National Soil Survey Center, located in Lincoln, NE, is responsible for maintaining and updating this glossary. Soil Science Division staff and NCSS participants are encouraged to propose additions and changes to the glossary for use in pedon descriptions, soil map unit descriptions, and soil survey publications. The Glossary of Geology (GG, 2005) serves as a major source for many glossary terms. The American Geologic Institute (AGI) granted the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) permission (in letters dated September 11, 1985, and September 22, 1993) to use existing definitions. Sources of, and modifications to, original definitions are explained immediately below. 629.2 Definitions A. Reference Codes Sources from which definitions were taken, whole or in part, are identified by a code (e.g., GG) following each definition.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to 1.000 Foraminifera from Southwestern Pacific New Caledonia
    Jean-Pierre Debenay A Guide to 1,000 Foraminifera from Southwestern Pacific New Caledonia PUBLICATIONS SCIENTIFIQUES DU MUSÉUM Debenay-1 7/01/13 12:12 Page 1 A Guide to 1,000 Foraminifera from Southwestern Pacific: New Caledonia Debenay-1 7/01/13 12:12 Page 2 Debenay-1 7/01/13 12:12 Page 3 A Guide to 1,000 Foraminifera from Southwestern Pacific: New Caledonia Jean-Pierre Debenay IRD Éditions Institut de recherche pour le développement Marseille Publications Scientifiques du Muséum Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle Paris 2012 Debenay-1 11/01/13 18:14 Page 4 Photos de couverture / Cover photographs p. 1 – © J.-P. Debenay : les foraminifères : une biodiversité aux formes spectaculaires / Foraminifera: a high biodiversity with a spectacular variety of forms p. 4 – © IRD/P. Laboute : îlôt Gi en Nouvelle-Calédonie / Island Gi in New Caledonia Sauf mention particulière, les photos de cet ouvrage sont de l'auteur / Except particular mention, the photos of this book are of the author Préparation éditoriale / Copy-editing Yolande Cavallazzi Maquette intérieure et mise en page / Design and page layout Aline Lugand – Gris Souris Maquette de couverture / Cover design Michelle Saint-Léger Coordination, fabrication / Production coordination Catherine Plasse La loi du 1er juillet 1992 (code de la propriété intellectuelle, première partie) n'autorisant, aux termes des alinéas 2 et 3 de l'article L. 122-5, d'une part, que les « copies ou reproductions strictement réservées à l'usage privé du copiste et non destinées à une utilisation collective » et, d'autre part, que les analyses et les courtes citations dans un but d'exemple et d'illustration, « toute représentation ou reproduction intégrale ou partielle, faite sans le consentement de l'auteur ou de ses ayants droit ou ayants cause, est illicite » (alinéa 1er de l'article L.
    [Show full text]