ALASKA MARITIME NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE HOMER, ALASKA ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT CALENDER YEAR 1989 U.S. Department of Fish and Wi

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ALASKA MARITIME NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE HOMER, ALASKA ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT CALENDER YEAR 1989 U.S. Department of Fish and Wi ALASKA MARITIME NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE HOMER, ALASKA ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT CALENDER YEAR 1989 u.s. Department of Fish and Wildlife NATIONAL WILDLIFE HOMER OFFICE ALASKA MARITIME NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Homer, Alaska ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT Calendar Year 1989 u.s. Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE SYSTEM REVIEW AND APPROVALS ALASKA MARITIME NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Homer, Alaska ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT Calendar Year 1989 /6~?ta~r · -~~ ~ .. A:'ocf~~Date-· C/ Refuges & Wildlife ~~___#_._ Regional Off1ce Approval Date INTRODUCTION Homer Headquarters Office Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge The 3,500,000 acre Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge (Maritime Refuge} was established in 1980 by the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (Lands Act}. This act added 460,000 acres of additional lands to eleven existing refuges combining practically all coastal refuge areas under one office. There are about 3,000 headlands, islands, islets, and pinnacle rocks within the refuge. These areas are used annually by about 75 million nesting seabirds representing about 80 percent of Alaska's seabird population. Each of the eleven refuges included in the Maritime Refuge had their own establishing authority and purposes, but the Lands Act added to these stating management shall: 1} conserve fish and wildlife populations and habitats in their natural diversity; 2} fulfill the international treaty obligations of the United States with respect to fish and wildlife and their habitats; 3} provide the opportunity for continued subsistence uses by local residents; 4} provide a program of national and international scientific research on marine resources; and 5} ensure, to the maximum extent practicable, water quality and necessary water quantity within the refuge. The Lands Act also established five distinct geographic refuge units: the Chukchi Sea Unit, the Bering Sea Unit, the Aleutian Islands Unit, the Alaska Peninsula Unit, and the Gulf of Alaska Unit (Figure 1}. The five units which comprise the Maritime Refuge have headquarters located in Homer, Alaska. Homer is situated on the south end of the Kenai Peninsula about 220 miles by road from Anchorage. There is a sub-headquarters at Adak which administers the Aleutian Islands Unit. The sea is common to all refuge areas, but each unit has its own unique features. Lush rain forests dominate much of the precipitous small islands in the Gulf of Alaska Unit; there are mountains rising directly from the sea to over 9,000 feet on the volcanic and treeless Aleutian Islands Unit; and areas of permafrost and high coastal escarpments are found in the Chukchi Sea Unit. Overall remoteness, bad weather and accompanying rough seas, swift currents, rocky shorelines, poor anchorages, and high cost of transportation make administration of the refuge difficult. Recent interests in the oil-rich areas off Alaska's coast, increased demand for fishery stocks, increased population, and increases in efficient and more comfortable tourist transportation to remote areas are adding to management responsibilities of the refuge. Units of the ALASKA MARITIME NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE t""' 0 -.... ....... _ (l til .....rt 0 ;:l 0 Hl rt ::r' rt> c .....;:l ---- rt en 0 Hl rt ::r' rt> ~> til en ;>;" til ::s:: til 'i..... rt..... El rt> z Ill .....rt 0 ;:l til ""·.. ~ .....~ ~ 0. .....~ Hl rt> :::0 rt> II IIIII lOO Hl -~ __._.... c:: ....... (lQ rt> IN'1'T(OI'UCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS i A. HIGHLIGHTS 1 B. CLIMATIC CONDITIONS 1. Fee Title. .• Nothing to report 2. Easements. •. Nothing to report 3. Other •••••• •• Nothing to report D. PLANNING 1. Master Plan ••••••••••• . .... 1 2. Management Plan ••••••• . ..•..••• 2 3. Public Participation •• . • • • • • • . • • • . • • • 2 4. Compliance with Environmental and Cultural Resource Mandates ••• • ••••••••• Nothing to report 5. Research and Investigations. • .Nothing to report 6 . Other . ...................... •••••• Nothing to report E. ADMINISTRATION 1. Personnel •••••• . • • • • • • . • • • • • . • • 3 2. Youth Programs. • ••• Nothing to report 3. Other Manpower Programs •• • •• Nothing to report 4 . Volunteer Program ••••••• . • . 7 5. Funding . ............. • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• 7 6. Safety .............. • • . • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • . • • 8 7. Technical Assistance. • ••••••• Nothing to report 8. Other • . • • • • • • • . • . • • 9 F. HABITAT MANAGEMENT 1. General ••• . •••• Nothing to report 2. v\fetlands. ....... • .Nothing to report 3. Forests •••• ..... ••• Nothing to report 4. Croplands. • .Nothing to report 5. Grasslands. ....... •••••••• Nothing to report 6 • Other Habitats •• ..... ........... Nothing to report 7. Grazing •••••••.• . •••• Nothing to report ii F. HABITAT MANAGEMENT (cont.) 8. Haying . ............ • •• Nothing to report 9 • Fire Management •••• • •• Nothing to report 10. Pest Control ••••••••••• . • •• Nothing to report 11. Water Rights ••••••••••• . • ••••• Nothing to report 12. Wilderness and Special Acres. • •••• Nothing to report 13. WPA Easement Monitoring •••••• • •••.• Nothing to report G. WILDLIFE 1. Wildlife Diversity ••••••••••••• .Nothing to report 2. Endangered and/or Threatened Species •••••••••••••••••• • ••••• Nothing to report 3. Waterfowl ...................... • .Nothing to report 4. Marsh and Water Birds ••••••••••• . .Nothing to report 5. Shorebirds, Gulls, Terns and Allied Species............................. .Nothing to report 6. Raptors............... • •••••• Nothing to report 7. Other Migratory Birds.. • ••••••••• Nothing to report 8. Game Mammals...................... ..Nothing to report 9. Marine Mammals........ •••••• • ••• Nothing to report 10. Other Resident Wildlife •••••••••••••••••• Nothing to report 11. Fisheries Resources ••••••••••.••••••••••• Nothing to report 12. Wildlife Propagation and Stocking •••••• Nothing to report 13. Surplus Animal Disposal........ ..Nothing to report 14. Scientific Collections......... ..Nothing to report 15. Animal Control ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Nothing to report 16. Marking and Banding............ • •••• Nothing to report 17. Disease Prevention and Control ••••••••••• Nothing to report H. PUBLIC USE 1. General ••••••••••••••• .17 2. Outdoor Classrooms-Students. .19 3. Outdoor Classrooms-Teachers •••• • 2 0 4. Interpretive Foot Trails ••••••••• • •• Nothing to report 5. Interpretive Tour Routes ••••••••• •••••••• Nothing to report 6. Interpretive Exhibits/ Demonstrations ••••••••••••••• • .••••••.•..•••• 2 0 7. Other Interpretive Programs •• . ...•.•....••.•... 23 8. Hunting. ............. • ••• Nothing to report 9 • Fishing •••••••••••••• • ••• Nothing to report 10. Trapping ...................... • ••• Nothing to report 11. Wildlife Observation... • • • • • • • • • •••••••••••••••••• 24 12. Other Wildlife Oriented Recreation.. ..Nothing to report 13. Camping.............. • •••••••••••••••• Nothing to report 14. Picnicking ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Nothing to report iii H. PUBLIC USE (cont.) 15. Off-Road Vehicling •••••••••• .Nothing to report 16. Other Non-Wildlife Oriented Recreation ••••••••••••••• . ••• Nothing to report 17. Law Enforcement •••••••••• • •••••••••••••••••• 24 18. Cooperating Associations. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2 5 19. Concessions ••••••••••••••• ..Nothing to report 1. New Construction •••• .Nothing to report 2. Rehabilitation ••••••• . ••••• Nothing to report 3. Major Maintenance ••• . .Nothing to report 4. Equipment Utilization and Replacement •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 25 5. Communications Systems •• •••• Nothing to report 6. Computer Systems •••• .Nothing to report 7. Energy Conservation. • .Nothing to report 8. Other . .............. ••••••• Nothing to report J. OTHER ITEMS 1. Cooperative Programs •• • ••••.•• Nothing to report 2. Other Economic Uses. • ••• Nothing to report 3. Items of Interest. • •••••• 3 2 4. Credits •••••••••••••• . ....•..•........... 32 K. FEEDBACK L. INFORMATION PACKET 1 A. HIGHLIGHTS Exxon Valdez oil spill wreaks environmental and administrative havoc. Michael Blenden fills Deputy Refuge Manager position vacated by Tom Early. Eric Nelson fills Marine Machinery Mechanic position aboard M/V ~lax. Susan Schulmeister and Don Dragoo fill newly established permanent intermittent Biological Technician positions. Public visitation to Homer Visitor Center soars. Refuge receives a Congressional appropriation to conduct a concept study for a visitor center and headquarters in Homer. Supervisory Wildlife Biologist Nysewander and Wildlife Biologists Nishimoto and Bailey detailed to Exxo~ Valdez Oil Spill Assessment Task Force. Regional Director Stieglitz and Assistant Regional Director Rogers conduct inspections of Aleutians, Pribilof Islands and St. Matthew Island. Refuge Manager Martin detailed to Anchorage Regional Office as Associate Manager from March 20 - May 1. Mike Hedrick, Deputy Refuge Manager from Kenai National Wildlife Refuge, detailed as Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge's Manager in Martin's absence. D. PLANNING 1. Master Plan The refuge's Comprehensive Conservation Plan which was signed off on in October of 1988 called for establishment of a permanent refuge headquarters and large visitor center in 2 Homer. In November of 1989, the refuge learned that Congress had appropriated $100,000 for development of a concept plan for the refuge headquarters and visitor center. Refuge Manager Martin and Outdoor Recreation Planner (ORP) Benson traveled to Anchorage to meet with the Regional Office (RO) engineering staff and create
Recommended publications
  • Late-Quaternary Geomorphic Processes: Effects on the Ancient Aleuts of Umnak Island in the Aleutians
    Late-Quaternary Geomorphic Processes: Effects on the Ancient Aleuts of Umnak Island in the Aleutians ROBERT F. BLACK1 ABSTRACT. Glaciation, volcanic activity, marine processes and wind action affected in various ways the lives of the ancient Aleuts of Umnak Island, who first settled at Anangula about 8,400 BP following deglaciation some 3,000 years earlier. Expanding alpine glaciers reached the sea in places about 3,000 BP without the nearby peoples being much affected. A catastrophic eruption of Okmok Volcano about 8,250 BP is suggested as the cause of the abandonment of the oldest known siteof Anangula, and subsequentmigration westward into thecentral Aleutians. Cutting of strandflats between 8,250 and 3,000 BP led to the development of a very large, accessible, year- round food resource, and an apparent proliferationof settlements. In marked contrast to other parts of Beringia, Umnak Island became the site most favourable for human settlement. RfiSUMe: Les processus géomorphologiques fini-quaternaires et leurs conséquencespour les anciens Aléoutes de Me d’Umnak dans les Aléoutiennes. La glaciation, l’activite vol- canique, les processus marins et l’actiondu vent ont affect6 de diverses façonsla vie des anciens Aleoutes de l’ile d‘Umnak, qui s’établirent B Anangula vers 8400 AP, soit environ 3000 ans après la deglaciation. Les glaciers alpins en expansion atteignirentla mer par endroit vers 3000 AP sans que les habitants du voisinage soient beaucoup affectes. On suppose qu’une eruption catastrophique du volcan Okmok vers 8250 AP a caud l’abandon du plus vieux site COMU d’Anangula et une migration vers l’ouest jusqu’au centre des A16outiennes.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Monitoring at Aiktak Island, Alaska in 2016
    AMNWR 2017/02 BIOLOGICAL MONITORING AT AIKTAK ISLAND, ALASKA IN 2016 Sarah M. Youngren, Daniel C. Rapp, and Nora A. Rojek Key words: Aiktak Island, Alaska, Aleutian Islands, ancient murrelet, Cepphus columba, common murre, double-crested cormorant, fork-tailed storm-petrel, Fratercula cirrhata, Fratercula corniculata, glaucous-winged gull, horned puffin, Larus glaucescens, Leach’s storm-petrel, Oceanodroma furcata, Oceanodroma leucorhoa, pelagic cormorant, Phalacrocorax auritus, Phalacrocorax pelagicus, Phalacrocorax urile, pigeon guillemot, population trends, productivity, red-faced cormorant, Synthliboramphus antiquus, thick-billed murre, tufted puffin, Uria aalge, Uria lomvia. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge 95 Sterling Highway, Suite 1 Homer, AK 99603 January 2017 Cite as: Youngren, S. M., D. C. Rapp, and N. A. Rojek. 2017. Biological monitoring at Aiktak Island, Alaska in 2016. U.S. Fish and Wildl. Serv. Rep., AMNWR 2017/02. Homer, Alaska. Tufted puffins flying along the southern coast of Aiktak Island, Alaska. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 1 STUDY AREA ............................................................................................................................................... 1 METHODS ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    AMNWR 08/13 BIOLOGICAL MONITORING AT AIKTAK ISLAND, ALASKA IN 2008: SUMMARY APPENDICES Brie A. Drummond Key words: Aiktak Island, Alaska, Aleutian Islands, ancient murrelet, Cepphus columba, common murre, double-crested cormorant, fork-tailed storm-petrel, Fratercula cirrhata, Fratercula corniculata, glaucous-winged gull, horned puffin, Larus glaucescens, Leach’s storm-petrel, Oceanodroma leucorhoa, Oceanodroma furcata, pelagic cormorant, Phalacrocorax auritus, Phalacrocorax pelagicus, Phalacrocorax urile, pigeon guillemot, population trends, productivity, red-faced cormorant, Synthliboramphus antiquus, thick-billed murre, tufted puffin, Uria aalge, Uria lomvia U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge Aleutian Islands Unit 95 Sterling Hwy, Suite 1 Homer, Alaska 99603 September 2008 Cite as: Drummond, B. A. Biological monitoring at Aiktak Island, Alaska in 2008: summary appendices. U.S. Fish and Wildl. Serv. Rep., AMNWR 08/13. Homer, Alaska. 139 pp. Southern coast of Aiktak Island, Alaska, in early June. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................................... 1 STUDY AREA............................................................................................................................................. ..1 METHODS.................................................................................................................................................. ..2 INTERESTING OBSERVATIONS..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Aleutian Islands
    Journal of Global Change Data & Discovery. 2018, 2(1): 109-114 © 2018 GCdataPR DOI:10.3974/geodp.2018.01.18 Global Change Research Data Publishing & Repository www.geodoi.ac.cn Global Change Data Encyclopedia Aleutian Islands Liu, C.1* Yang, A. Q.2 Hu, W. Y.1 Liu, R. G.1 Shi, R. X.1 1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; 2. Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing100101,China Keywords: Aleutian Islands; Fox Islands; Four Mountains Islands; Andreanof Islands; Rat Islands; Near Islands; Kommandor Islands; Unimak Island; USA; Russia; data encyclopedia The Aleutian Islands extends latitude from 51°12′35″N to 55°22′14″N and longitude about 32 degrees from 165°45′10″E to 162°21′10″W, it is a chain volcanic islands belonging to both the United States and Russia[1–3] (Figure 1, 2). The islands are formed in the northern part of the Pacific Ring of Fire. They form part of the Aleutian Arc in the Northern Pacific Ocean, extending about 1,900 km westward from the Alaska Peninsula to- ward the Kamchatka Peninsula in Russia, Figure 1 Dataset of Aleutian Islands in .kmz format and mark a dividing line between the Ber- ing Sea to the north and the Pacific Ocean to the south. The islands comprise 6 groups of islands (east to west): the Fox Islands[4–5], islands of Four Mountains[6–7], Andreanof Islands[8–9], Rat Islands[10–11], Near Is- lands[12–13] and Kommandor Islands[14–15].
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Little Sitkin Island, Alaska
    Geology of Little Sitkin Island By G. L. SNYDER INVESTIGATIONS OF ALASKAN VOLCANOES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1028-H Prepared in cooperation with the Departments of the Army, Navy, and Air Force UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1959 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director The U. S. Geological Survey Library has cataloged this publication as follows : Snyder, George Leonard, 1927- Geology of Little Sitkin Island, Alaska. Washington, U. S. Govt. Print. Off., 1958. - vi, 169-210 p. illus., 2 maps (1 fold. col. in pocket) tables. 24 cm. (U. S. Geological Survey. Bulletin 1028-H. Investigations of Alas- kan volcanoes) Prepared in cooperation with the Departments of the Army, Navy, and Air Force. "References cited" : p. 206-207. 1. Rocks, Igneous. 2. Petrology Aleutian Islands. 3. Little Sitkin Island. I. Title. (Series: U. S. Geological Survey. Bulletin 1028-H. Series: U. S. Geological Survey. Investigations of Alaskau volcanoes) 557.98 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. PKEFACE In October 1945 the War Department (now Department of the Army) requested the Geological Survey to undertake a program of volcano investigations in the Aleutian Islands-Alaska Peninsula area. The field studies were made during the years 1946-1954. The results of the first year's field, laboratory, and library work were hastily assembled as two administrative reports, and most of these data have been revised for publication in Geological Survey Bulletin 1028. Part of the early work was published in 1950 in Bulletin 974-B, Volcanic activity in the Aleutian arc, and in 1951 in Bulletin 989-A, Geology of Buldir Island, Aleutian Islands, Alaska, both by Robert R.
    [Show full text]
  • Sea Otters and Kelp Forest fishes in the Aleutian Archipelago
    Oecologia (2005) DOI 10.1007/s00442-005-0230-1 COMMUNITY ECOLOGY Shauna E. Reisewitz Æ James A. Estes Charles A. Simenstad Indirect food web interactions: sea otters and kelp forest fishes in the Aleutian archipelago Received: 24 January 2005 / Accepted: 25 July 2005 Ó Springer-Verlag 2005 Abstract Although trophic cascades—the effect of apex of otter-free systems at islands where otters were initially predators on progressively lower trophic level species abundant. Significant changes in greenling diet occurred through top-down forcing—have been demonstrated in between the mid-1980s and the 2000 although the rea- diverse ecosystems, the broader potential influences of sons for these changes were difficult to assess because of trophic cascades on other species and ecosystem pro- strong island-specific effects. Whereas urchin-dominated cesses are not well studied. We used the overexploita- communities supported more diverse fish assemblages tion, recovery and subsequent collapse of sea otter than kelp-dominated communities, this was not a simple (Enhydra lutris) populations in the Aleutian archipelago effect of the otter-induced trophic cascade because all to explore if and how the abundance and diet of kelp islands supported more diverse fish assemblages in 2000 forest fishes are influenced by a trophic cascade linking than in the mid-1980s. sea otters with sea urchins and fleshy macroalgae. We measured the abundance of sea urchins (biomass den- Keywords Kelp Æ Rock greenling Æ Sea urchins Æ sity), kelp (numerical density) and fish (Catch per unit Trophic cascades effort) at four islands in the mid-1980s (when otters were abundant at two of the islands and rare at the two others) and in 2000 (after otters had become rare at all Introduction four islands).
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Postgraduate School Thesis
    NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS ALASKAN STREAM CIRCULATION AND EXCHANGES THROUGH THE ALEUTIAN ISLAND PASSES: 1979-2003 MODEL RESULTS by Ricardo Roman March 2006 Thesis Advisor: Wieslaw Maslowski Second Reader: Stephen Okkonen Approved for public release; distribution unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704- 0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED March 2006 Master’s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE: Alaskan Stream Circulation and 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Exchanges through the Aleutian Island Passes: 1979-2003 Model Results 6. AUTHOR Ricardo Roman 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Naval Postgraduate School REPORT NUMBER Monterey, CA 93943-5000 9. SPONSORING /MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING N/A AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 44, Number 2 2017 PACIFIC SEABIRD GROUP Dedicated to the Study and Conservation of Pacific Seabirds and Their Environment
    PACIFIC SEABIRDS A Publication of the Pacific Seabird Group Volume 44, Number 2 2017 PACIFIC SEABIRD GROUP Dedicated to the Study and Conservation of Pacific Seabirds and Their Environment The Pacific Seabird Group (PSG) is a society of professional seabird researchers and managers dedicated to the study and conservation of seabirds. PSG was formed in 1972 out of a need for increased communication among academic and government seabird researchers. The principal goals of PSG are to (1) increase the quality and quantity of seabird research through facilitating exchange of information; (2) identify and assess the importance of threats to seabird populations; and (3) provide government agencies and others with expert advice on managing populations of seabirds. PSG is headed by an Executive Council composed of members volunteering their time. Members include biologists, wildlife managers, students, and conservationists from the United States, Mexico, Canada, Japan and 12 other countries. PSG annual meetings and publications provide forums where members can share their findings on all research topics relating to Pacific seabirds and discuss local and large scale conservation issues. Abstracts for meetings are published on our website. PSG publishes the on-line bulletin Pacific Seabirds (formerly the PSG Bulletin; www.pacificseabirdgroup.org) and the journal Marine Ornithology (www.marineornithology.org). Other publications include symposium volumes and technical reports; these are listed near the back of this issue. PSG is a member of the Ornithological Council and the American Bird Conservancy. Annual dues for membership are $40 (individual); $30 (student, undergraduate and graduate); and $1,200 (Life Membership, payable in five $240 installments).
    [Show full text]
  • 17 R.-..Ry 19" OCS Study MMS 88-0092
    OCISt.., "'1~2 Ecologic.1 Allociue. SYII'tUsIS 0' ~c. (I( 1'B IPnCfS OP MOISE AlII) DIsmuA1K2 a, IIUc. IIADLOft m.::IIIDA1'IONS or lUIS SIA PI.-IPms fr •• LGL Muke ••••• rda Aaeoc:iat_, Inc •• 505 "-t IIortbera Lllbta .1••••,"Sait. 201 ABdaonp, AlMke 99503 for u.s. tIl_rala •••••••••• Seni.ce Al_1taa o.t.r CoIItlM11tal Shelf legion U.S. u.,c. of Iat.dor ••• 603, ,., EMt 36tla A.-... A8eb0ra•• , Aluke 99501 Coatraet _. 14-12-00CU-30361 LGL •••••• 'U 821 17 r.-..ry 19" OCS Study MMS 88-0092 StAllUIS OWIUOlMUc. 011'DB &IIBCfI ,. 11010 AlII) DIS'ftJU8CB 011llAJoa IWJLOU'r COIICIII'DArIa. OW101. SB&PIDU&DI by S.R. Johnson J.J. Burnsl C.I. Malme2 R.A. Davis LGL Alaska Research Associatel, Inc. 505 West Northern Lights Blv~., Suite 201 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 for u.S. Minerals Management Service Alaskan Outer Continental Shelf Region U.S. Dept. of Interior Room 603, 949 East 36th Avenue Anchorage, Alaska 99508 Contract no. 14-12-0001-30361 LGL Rep. No. TA 828 17 February 1989 The opinionl, findings, conclusions, or recolmBendations expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Dept. of the Interior. nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the Federal Government. 1 Living Resources Inc., Fairbanks, AK 2 BBN Systems and Technologies Corporation, Cambridge, MA Table of Contents ii 'UIU or cc»mll UBLBor cowmll ii AIS'lIAC'f • · . vi Inter-site Population Sensitivity Index (IPSI) vi Norton Basin Planning Area • • vii St.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Timeline for Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge
    Historical Timeline Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge Much of the refuge has been protected as a national wildlife refuge for over a century, and we recognize that refuge lands are the ancestral homelands of Alaska Native people. Development of sophisticated tools and the abundance of coastal and marine wildlife have made it possible for people to thrive here for thousands of years. So many facets of Alaska’s history happened on the lands and waters of the Alaska Maritime Refuge that the Refuge seems like a time-capsule story of the state and the conservation of island wildlife: • Pre 1800s – The first people come to the islands, the Russian voyages of discovery, the beginnings of the fur trade, first rats and fox introduced to islands, Steller sea cow goes extinct. • 1800s – Whaling, America buys Alaska, growth of the fox fur industry, beginnings of the refuge. • 1900 to 1945 – Wildlife Refuge System is born and more land put in the refuge, wildlife protection increases through treaties and legislation, World War II rolls over the refuge, rats and foxes spread to more islands. The Aleutian Islands WWII National Monument designation recognizes some of these significant events and places. • 1945 to the present – Cold War bases built on refuge, nuclear bombs on Amchitka, refuge expands and protections increase, Aleutian goose brought back from near extinction, marine mammals in trouble. Refuge History - Pre - 1800 A World without People Volcanoes push up from the sea. Ocean levels fluctuate. Animals arrive and adapt to dynamic marine conditions as they find niches along the forming continent’s miles of coastline.
    [Show full text]
  • Life on the Amchitka Island Test Site Ob Balick Was Never a Bconstruction Worker
    SUPPORTED BY THE BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION TRADES DEPARTMENT, AFL-CIO • COORDINATED BY CPWR - THE CENTER FOR CONSTRUCTION RESEARCH & TRAINING Special Online Issue Spring 2016 www.btmed.org Life on the Amchitka Island Test Site ob Balick was never a B construction worker. He wasn’t part of a building trade on a DOE Site, like the vast majority of men and women who have gone through the BTMed program. Yet, because of how much dangerous radiation he was exposed to during his work placement on the Amchitka test site, BTMed’s medical screenings are available to him and everyone he worked Air Force Communications Team with Tropospheric Scatter Radio Equipment. with there. Photo courtesy of Bob Balick Amchitka, a small island years for it to decompose to half its size, so the nuclear in the Aleutian Island Chain radiation from all three tests will be around for a while.” off the coast of Alaska, was the site of three underground Despite the official assurances that the test would be nuclear explosion tests in 1965, 1969, and 1971. Bob harmless and there would be no radioactive leakage, worked on radio communications prior to and after the Bob still found himself classified as “nuclear-exposed” third and largest test, codenamed Cannikin. He was from his work on the site post- temporarily evacuated to nuclear test. “I like to say I Anchorage as “Detonation “Nuclear radiation has thousands glow in the dark,” he mentions, Non-essential”. After the of years of half-life... reflecting on his exposed status. explosion, he returned to It takes thousands of years for “That’s kind of humorous but I the island for a few days to it to decompose to half its size, so have the chance of developing help dismantle and transport the nuclear radiation from all three cancer from nuclear exposure.
    [Show full text]
  • ~Lllhl~V1•1T111~113 9980 00000 9908
    7 </-'! L 5 3 ~ J b -'fuscs-474-164 ~lllHl~V1•1t111~113 9980 00000 9908 UNITED s rA res DEPARfMENT Of TH£ INlEHIOR GEOLO !CAL SUR E\' F~d~ral Center, D nver. Colorado 80'2l BtSLIO< RAPllY OF Pl BL ::>HED REPORIS BY U.S .EOL)GlCAI SllRVEY PERSO lNEL ()!>~ THE GEOLOGY AND l!YDROL , OF TllE AMCHITKA St PPLFMENTARY U.:::iT AREA, ALEUTIAN ISLANDS, A1..ASKA, 1969- 72 (Amchlt a-39 Date Published· June 1973 Prepared Under Agreement No. AT(29-2)-474 for the Nevada Operations Office U.S. Atomic Energy Comm ission Amchitka-39 USGS-474-164 1973 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Federal Center, Denver, Colorado 80225 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF PUBLISHED REPORTS BY U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PERSONNEL ON THE GEOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY OF THE AMCHITKA SUPPLEMENTARY TEST AREA , ALEUTIAN ISLANDS, ALASKA, 1969-72 By Jane P. Ohl, compiler DEPARTMENT or THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SUR.VEY 179°E 610000--- 8£11/NC 5720000 SEA CANN I KIN ~·lo' LONG SHOT PACIFIC 0 C £AN 1ao• 5690000. )~~~ 9 I • I I ? lflMILES AMCHITKA ISLAND 6<'0000 179°E 670000 Un1irUHI Tt•M•lr11 Mtrcaior Pniectl• (UTMl 10000 ...., ,,.. hth , .... 60 Figure 1.--Amchitka Island, Alaska, showing locations of drill sites B, C, D, E, and F, and the nuclear tests Cannikin, Long Shot, and Milrow. BIBLIOGRAPHY (Entries marked by an asterisk are available only from U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22151.) *Anderson, R. E., 1971, Tectonic setting of Amchitka Islacd, Alaska: U.S. Geol. Survey rept.
    [Show full text]