DOCSLIB.ORG

Biological Monitoring at Aiktak Island, Alaska in 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Biological Monitoring at Aiktak Island, Alaska in 2016 AMNWR 2017/02 BIOLOGICAL MONITORING AT AIKTAK ISLAND, ALASKA IN 2016 Sarah M. Youngren, Daniel C. Rapp, and Nora A. Rojek Key words: Aiktak Island, Alaska, Aleutian Islands, ancient murrelet, Cepphus columba, common murre, double-crested cormorant, fork-tailed storm-petrel, Fratercula cirrhata, Fratercula corniculata, glaucous-winged gull, horned puffin, Larus glaucescens, Leach’s storm-petrel, Oceanodroma furcata, Oceanodroma leucorhoa, pelagic cormorant, Phalacrocorax auritus, Phalacrocorax pelagicus, Phalacrocorax urile, pigeon guillemot, population trends, productivity, red-faced cormorant, Synthliboramphus antiquus, thick-billed murre, tufted puffin, Uria aalge, Uria lomvia. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge 95 Sterling Highway, Suite 1 Homer, AK 99603 January 2017 Cite as: Youngren, S. M., D. C. Rapp, and N. A. Rojek. 2017. Biological monitoring at Aiktak Island, Alaska in 2016. U.S. Fish and Wildl. Serv. Rep., AMNWR 2017/02. Homer, Alaska. Tufted puffins flying along the southern coast of Aiktak Island, Alaska. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 1 STUDY AREA ............................................................................................................................................... 1 METHODS .................................................................................................................................................... 2 INTERESTING OBSERVATIONS ................................................................................................................ 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................................................ 5 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................................................. 5 ISLAND MAPS .............................................................................................................................................. 7 FIGURES AND TABLES ............................................................................................................................... 9 Black oystercatcher .............................................................................................................................. 10 Breeding chronology ...................................................................................................................... 10 Reproductive performance ............................................................................................................. 13 Populations .................................................................................................................................... 15 Food habits .................................................................................................................................... 17 Common murre ..................................................................................................................................... 19 Breeding chronology ...................................................................................................................... 19 Reproductive performance ............................................................................................................. 22 Thick-billed murre ................................................................................................................................. 26 Breeding chronology ...................................................................................................................... 26 Reproductive performance ............................................................................................................. 29 All murres .............................................................................................................................................. 33 Populations .................................................................................................................................... 33 Pigeon guillemot ................................................................................................................................... 37 Populations .................................................................................................................................... 37 Ancient murrelet.................................................................................................................................... 41 Breeding chronology ...................................................................................................................... 41 Reproductive performance ............................................................................................................. 44 Horned puffin ........................................................................................................................................ 46 Breeding chronology ...................................................................................................................... 46 Reproductive performance ............................................................................................................. 49 Chick growth .................................................................................................................................. 51 Populations .................................................................................................................................... 53 Food habits .................................................................................................................................... 58 Tufted puffin .......................................................................................................................................... 61 Breeding chronology ...................................................................................................................... 61 Reproductive performance ............................................................................................................. 64 Chick growth .................................................................................................................................. 66 Populations .................................................................................................................................... 68 Food habits .................................................................................................................................... 72 Glaucous-winged gull ........................................................................................................................... 81 Breeding chronology ...................................................................................................................... 81 Reproductive performance ............................................................................................................. 84 Populations .................................................................................................................................... 88 Food habits .................................................................................................................................... 93 i TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Page Fork-tailed storm-petrel ...................................................................................................................... 103 Breeding chronology .................................................................................................................... 103 Reproductive performance ........................................................................................................... 107 Chick growth ................................................................................................................................ 111 Food habits .................................................................................................................................. 113 Adult morphology ......................................................................................................................... 117 Leach’s storm-petrel ........................................................................................................................... 118 Breeding chronology .................................................................................................................... 118 Reproductive performance ........................................................................................................... 121 Chick growth ................................................................................................................................ 125 Food habits .................................................................................................................................. 127 Adult morphology ......................................................................................................................... 131 All storm-petrels .................................................................................................................................. 132 Reproductive performance ........................................................................................................... 132 Populations .................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 14Th North American Arctic Goose Conference and Workshop Program and Abstracts
    14th North American Arctic Goose Conference and Workshop Lincoln, Nebraska March 13-17, 2018 Program and Abstracts 14th North American Arctic Goose Conference and Workshop Program and Abstracts Table of Contents Welcome ................................................................................... 1 General Information ................................................................... 2 Conference Center Map ............................................................. 3 Conference Sponsors ................................................................ 4 Conference Committees ............................................................ 5 Plenary Speakers ...................................................................... 6 Meeting Schedule ...................................................................... 9 Abstracts–Plenaries ................................................................ 15 Abstracts–Oral Presentations .................................................. 17 Abstracts–Poster Presentations............................................... 43 14th North American Arctic Goose Conference and Workshop Lincoln, Nebraska March 13-17, 2018 We are pleased to welcome you to Lincoln and the 14th North American Arctic Goose Conference and Workshop! Lincoln is the state capital of Nebraska and home to the University of Nebraska. March is a special time in Nebraska. Millions of ducks and geese and a half-million sandhill cranes have or will come through the state stopping and “fueling” up before they migrate on to their
    [Show full text]
  • The Mark of the Japanese Murrelet (Synthliboramphus Wumizusume): a Study of Song and Stewardship in Japan’S Inland Sea
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont Pomona Senior Theses Pomona Student Scholarship 2019 The aM rk of the Japanese Murrelet (Synthliboramphus wumizusume): A study of song and stewardship in Japan’s Inland Sea Charlotte Hyde The Mark of the Japanese Murrelet (Synthliboramphus wumizusume): A study of song and stewardship in Japan’s Inland Sea Charlotte Hyde In partial fulfillment of the Bachelor of Arts Degree in Environmental Analysis, 2018-2019 academic year, Pomona College, Claremont, California Readers: Nina Karnovsky Wallace Meyer Acknowledgements I would first like to thank Professor Nina Karnovsky for introducing me to her work in Kaminoseki and for allowing me to join this incredible project, thereby linking me to a community of activists and scientists around the world. I am also so appreciative for her role as my mentor throughout my years as an undergraduate and for helping me develop my skills and confidence as a scholar and ecologist. Thank you also to my reader Wallace Meyer for his feedback on my writing and structure. I am so thankful for the assistance of Char Miller, who has worked tirelessly to give valuable advice and support to all seniors in the Environmental Analysis Department throughout their thesis journeys. Thank you to Marc Los Huertos for his assistance with R and data analysis, without which I would be hopelessly lost. I want to thank my peers in the Biology and Environmental Analysis departments for commiserating with me during stressful moments and for providing a laugh, hug, or shoulder to cry on, depending on the occasion. Thank you so much to my parents, who have supported me unconditionally throughout my turbulent journey into adulthood and who have never doubted my worth as a person or my abilities as a student.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Peninsula and Aleutian Islands Management Area Herring Sac Roe and Food and Bait Fisheries Annual Management Report, 2002
    ALASKA PENINSULA AND ALEUTIAN ISLANDS MANAGEMENT AREA HERRING SAC ROE AND FOOD AND BAIT FISHERIES ANNUAL MANAGEMENT REPORT, 2002 By Matthew T. Ford Charles Burkey Jr. and Robert L. Murphy Regional Information Report1 No. 4K03-11 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Commercial Fisheries 211 Mission Road Kodiak, Alaska 99615 March 2003 1 The Regional Information Report Series was established in 1987 to provide an information access system for all unpublished division reports. These reports frequently serve diverse ad hoc informational purposes or archive basic uninterpreted data. To accommodate timely reporting of recently collected information, reports in this series undergo only limited internal review and may contain preliminary data; this information may be subsequently finalized and published in the formal literature. Consequently, these reports should not be cited without prior approval of the author or the Division of Commercial Fisheries. AUTHORS Matthew T. Ford is the Alaska Peninsula and Aleutian Islands Management Area Assistant Herring Biologist and Alaska Peninsula-Southeastern District Salmon Assistant Management Biologist for Region IV, Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Commercial Fisheries, 211 Mission Road, Kodiak, Alaska, 99615. Charles Burkey Jr. is the Alaska Peninsula and Aleutian Islands Management Areas Herring Biologist and Alaska Peninsula-Southeastern District Salmon Management Biologist for Region IV, Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Commercial Fisheries, 211 Mission Road, Kodiak, Alaska, 99615. Robert L. Murphy is the North Alaska Peninsula Area Herring Biologist and North Alaska Peninsula Salmon Management Biologist for Region IV, Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Commercial Fisheries, 211 Mission Road, Kodiak, Alaska, 99615.
    [Show full text]
  • St Kilda World Heritage Site: Statement of Outstanding Universal Value
    St Kilda World Heritage Site: Statement of Outstanding Universal Value Adopted by UNESCO World Heritage Committee Thirty-seventh session, Phnom Penh, Cambodia, June 2013 http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/387 Property St Kilda State Party United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Id. N° 387bis Date of inscription 1986 – 2004 - 2005 Brief synthesis The tiny archipelago of St Kilda, lying off the west coast of mainland Scotland, is breathtaking. Formed from the rim of an ancient volcano associated with the opening up of the North Atlantic some 65-52 million years ago, the intensely dramatic, jagged landscape of towering cliffs – some of the highest sea cliffs in Europe – and sea stacks present stark black precipitous faces plunging from steep grass-green slopes in excess of 375m. Scenically, every element appears vertical, except the smooth amphitheatre of Village Bay on Hirta with its relict historic landscape. Exposure to some of the greatest wave heights and strongest wind speeds in Europe plays a major role in shaping the coastal ecology. With nearly one million seabirds present at the height of the breeding season, St Kilda supports the largest seabird colony in the north-east Atlantic, its size and diversity of global significance making it a seabird sanctuary without parallel in Europe. The very high bird densities that occur in this relatively small area, conditioned by the complex and different ecological niches existing in the site and the productivity of the surrounding sea, make St Kilda unique. Of particular significance are the populations of Northern Gannet, Atlantic Puffin and Northern Fulmar.
    [Show full text]
  • King Eider (Somateria Spectabilis) French: Eider À Tête Grise
    Sea Duck Information Series King Eider (Somateria spectabilis) French: Eider à tête grise Description King eiders are a moderately large sea duck, weighing 1200-2100 g (2.6 – 4.6 lbs). Male king eiders are one of the most ornately plumaged ducks in North America. In breeding plumage (late fall through mid- summer), males sport a large orange- yellow knob between their bill and forehead. Their forehead, crown, and nape is pearl blue, with iridescent pale green cheeks and a reddish- orange bill. The lower portion of their head, neck, upper back, and breast is white with the remainder of the body black. The longest feathers along their upper flanks have triangular extensions that form a sail-like projection on their back. Female king eiders in breeding plumage are mostly dark reddish brown with extensive black barring Photo: USFWS along their sides and flanks. Their King Eiders in breeding plumage bill is olive or yellowish-gray and lacks the knob that the male has. In eastern North America, nest-building and egg laying within a King eiders migrate in large king eiders winter primarily at week of arrival. Females lay one egg undulating flocks and their wings sea along the coasts of Labrador per day and clutch size averages 4-5 whistle in flight. On the water, it’s and Newfoundland, with smaller eggs. Incubation lasts about 23 days. mostly the male that makes sounds, numbers south to Virginia and in the Ducklings can fly when about 50 days including a soft dovelike urrr urrr eastern Great Lakes. Some unknown old.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Murrelet Synthliboramphus Antiquus
    Major: Ancient Murrelet Synthliboramphus antiquus colony attendance at Langara 233 ANCIENT MURRELET SYNTHLIBORAMPHUS ANTIQUUS COLONY ATTENDANCE AT LANGARA ISLAND ASSESSED USING OBSERVER COUNTS AND RADAR IN RELATION TO TIME AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS HEATHER L. MAJOR1,2 1Centre for Wildlife Ecology, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada 2Current address: Department of Biological Sciences, University of New Brunswick, P.O. Box 5050, Saint John, NB E2L 4L5, Canada ([email protected]) Received 10 June 2016, accepted 26 July 2016 SUMMARY MAJOR, H.L. 2016. Ancient Murrelet Synthliboramphus antiquus colony attendance at Langara Island assessed using observer counts and radar in relation to time and environmental conditions. Marine Ornithology 44: 233–240. The decision to attend a colony on any given day or night is arguably the result of a trade-off between survival and reproductive success. It is often difficult to study this trade-off, as monitoring patterns of colony attendance for nocturnal burrow-nesting seabirds is challenging. Here, I 1) examined the effectiveness of monitoring Ancient Murrelet colony arrivals using marine radar, and 2) evaluated differences in colony attendance behavior in relation to time, light, and weather. I found a strong correlation between the number of Ancient Murrelets counted by observers in the colony and the number of radar targets counted, with estimated radar target counts being ~95 times higher than observer counts. My hypothesis that patterns of colony attendance are related to environmental conditions (i.e. light and weather) and that this relationship changes with time after sunset was supported.
    [Show full text]
  • Tufted Puffin
    Interpretative Fact Sheet Tufted Puffin (Fratercula cirrhata) The following short article is from the Oregon Coast 101 Species collection used by the Guide and Outfitter Recognized Professional (GORP) training program. These articles are intended to provide interesting facts you can share with your clientele and add value to your services. An Interpretive Fact Sheet has been written about each species. We are currently uploading these blogs and creating the links. Come visit us! Tourism and Business Development College of Business, Oregon State University Extension - Oregon Sea Grant at http://tourism.oregonstate.edu/ Guide and Outfitter Recognized Professional Program https://www.GORPguide.org For more information about the GORP training program see: https://www.gorpguide.org/become-a-gorp-certified-guide Tufted Puffin (Fratercula cirrhata) tourism.oregonstate.edu/tufted-puffin-fratercula-cirrhata/ By colliek2 August 28, 2020 ‘Small Axe’ The tufted puffin is a familiar bird on the Russian and U.S. Pacific coasts. In Russia it is known as ‘toporok’ meaning “small axe.” Not only is this a nod to the shape of the bill but also to one of the main breeding sites, Kamen Toporkov (“Tufted Puffin Rock”) which is an islet offshore Bering Island. Mature, breeding adult Tufted Puffin (royalty free Unsplash) Local Finds We don’t have to go to Russia to see them as they are also found in our backyards (so to speak). This recognizable seabird nests on Oregon headland such as Cape Mears, Cape Lookout, Cape Foulweather, Yaquina Head, and further north at Three Arch Rocks. 1/4 Recognizing The large triangular red-orange bill is definitely unique and is most visible on breeding adults during the summer reproductive season.
    [Show full text]
  • Scotland 2014 Outer Hebrides & the Highlands
    Scotland 2014 Outer Hebrides & the Highlands 22 May – 7 June 2014 St Kilda Wren, Hirta, St Kilda, Scotland, 30 May 2014 (© Vincent van der Spek) Vincent van der Spek, July 2014 1 highlights Red Grouse (20), Ptarmigan (4-5), Black Grouse (5), American Wigeon (1), Long- tailed Duck (5), three divers in summer plumage: Great Northern (c. 25), Red- throated (dozens) and Black-throated (1), Slavonian Grebe (1), 10.000s of Gannets and 1000s of Fulmars, Red Kite (5), Osprey (2 different nests), White-tailed Eagle (8), Golden Eagle (1), Merlin (2), Corncrake (2), the common Arctic waders in breeding habitat, Dotterel (1), Pectoral Sandpiper (1), sum plum Red-necked Phalarope (2), Great Skua (c. 125), Glaucous Gull (1), Puffin (c. 20.000), Short- eared Owl (1), Rock Dove (many), St Kilda Wren (8), other ssp. from the British Isles (incl. Wren Dunnock and Song Thrush from the Hebrides), Ring Ouzel (4), Scottish Crossbill (9), Snow Bunting (2), Risso’s Dolphin (4), Otter (1). missed species Capercaillie, ‘Irish’ Dipper ssp. hibernicus, the hoped for passage of Long-tailed and Pomarine Skuas, Midgets. Ptarmigan, male, Cairn Gorm, Highlands, Scotland, 3 June 2014 (© Vincent van der Spek) 2 introduction Keete suggested Scotland as a holiday destination several times in the past, so after I dragged her to many tropical destinations instead it was about time we went to the northern part of the British Isles. And I was not to be disappointed! Scotland really is a beautiful place, with great people. Both on the isles, with its wild and sometimes desolate vibe and very friendly folks and in the highlands, there seemed to be a stunning view behind every stunning view.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska King Eider Hunting Story Quest for a King
    for a QBRIANuest LYNN King An arctic adventure for & king eiders more PHOTOGRAPHS COURTESY OF RAMSEY RUSSELL “Eider!” shore tensed, each edging forward on perches of frozen boul- a pause of refl ection and admiration. And how could it not? In a “Eider!” ders, trying desperately to close the distance to the bird, raising land of muted grays and whites, the king eider’s markings pop, “Eider!” shotguns to shoulders as one of the crown jewels of waterfowl- identifying it as a rare and precious gem. A close inspection of The staccato voices echoed down the ing made his haphazard approach. Pushed shoreward by the the mighty sea duck reveals a multi-hued head—a crown of shore as I peered into the slow-rising sun pounding wind, the king eider could not hold his open-sea line blue feathers giving way to green cheeks, the plumage so fi ne for the one bird that had brought me thou- behind a protective wave once it crashed in the shallows. He and thick it nearly resembles fur. The bright yellow medallion sands of miles in January to a small island succumbed to the relentless forces of nature, and then to an- on the orange bill adds to the bird’s vibrancy. Ein the middle of Alaska’s Bering Sea. other gunner’s spray of shot. So prized and elusive are king eiders that only a handful of And there it was: a drake king eider. A A jubilant celebration of voices carried inland over the bar- waterfowlers have a chance to pursue them every year.
    [Show full text]
  • Designation of Critical Habitat for the Southwest Alaska Distinct Population Segment of the Northern Sea Otter; Final Rule
    Thursday, October 8, 2009 Part III Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for the Southwest Alaska Distinct Population Segment of the Northern Sea Otter; Final Rule VerDate Nov<24>2008 19:03 Oct 07, 2009 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\08OCR3.SGM 08OCR3 srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES3 51988 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 194 / Thursday, October 8, 2009 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR northern sea otter, refer to the final published in the Federal Register on listing rule published in the Federal August 9, 2005 (70 FR 46366). Fish and Wildlife Service Register on August 9, 2005 (70 FR Summary of Comments and 46366), the proposed rule to designate Recommendations 50 CFR Part 17 critical habitat published in the Federal Register on December 16, 2008 (73 FR We requested written comments from [FWS–R7–ES–2008–0105; 92210–1117– the public during the public comment 0000–FY08–B4] 76454), and the June 9, 2009 (74 FR 27271), notice of availability of the draft period on the proposed rule to designate RIN 1018–AV92 economic analysis (DEA). More detailed critical habitat for the southwest Alaska information on northern sea otter DPS of the northern sea otter. During the Endangered and Threatened Wildlife biology and ecology that is directly public comment period, we also and Plants; Designation of Critical relevant to designation of critical habitat contacted appropriate Federal, State, Habitat for the Southwest Alaska is discussed under the Primary and local agencies; Alaska Native Distinct Population Segment of the Constituent Elements section below.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    AMNWR 08/13 BIOLOGICAL MONITORING AT AIKTAK ISLAND, ALASKA IN 2008: SUMMARY APPENDICES Brie A. Drummond Key words: Aiktak Island, Alaska, Aleutian Islands, ancient murrelet, Cepphus columba, common murre, double-crested cormorant, fork-tailed storm-petrel, Fratercula cirrhata, Fratercula corniculata, glaucous-winged gull, horned puffin, Larus glaucescens, Leach’s storm-petrel, Oceanodroma leucorhoa, Oceanodroma furcata, pelagic cormorant, Phalacrocorax auritus, Phalacrocorax pelagicus, Phalacrocorax urile, pigeon guillemot, population trends, productivity, red-faced cormorant, Synthliboramphus antiquus, thick-billed murre, tufted puffin, Uria aalge, Uria lomvia U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge Aleutian Islands Unit 95 Sterling Hwy, Suite 1 Homer, Alaska 99603 September 2008 Cite as: Drummond, B. A. Biological monitoring at Aiktak Island, Alaska in 2008: summary appendices. U.S. Fish and Wildl. Serv. Rep., AMNWR 08/13. Homer, Alaska. 139 pp. Southern coast of Aiktak Island, Alaska, in early June. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................................... 1 STUDY AREA............................................................................................................................................. ..1 METHODS.................................................................................................................................................. ..2 INTERESTING OBSERVATIONS..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Fossil Seabirds from the Tertiary of the North Pacific
    Paleobiology,18(4), 1992, pp. 401-424 A review of the fossil seabirds fromthe Tertiaryof the North Pacific: plate tectonics,paleoceanography, and faunal change Kenneth I. Warheit Abstract.-Ecologists attempt to explain species diversitywithin Recent seabird communities in termsof Recent oceanographic and ecological phenomena. However, many of the principal ocean- ographic processes that are thoughtto structureRecent seabird systemsare functionsof geological processes operating at many temporal and spatial scales. For example, major oceanic currents,such as the North Pacific Gyre, are functionsof the relative positions of continentsand Antarcticgla- ciation,whereas regional air masses,submarine topography, and coastline shape affectlocal processes such as upwelling. I hypothesize that the long-termdevelopment of these abiotic processes has influencedthe relative diversityand communitycomposition of North Pacific seabirds. To explore this hypothesis,I divided the historyof North Pacific seabirds into seven intervalsof time. Using published descriptions,I summarized the tectonicand oceanographic events that occurred during each of these time intervals,and related changes in species diversityto changes in the physical environment.Over the past 95 years,at least 94 species of fossil seabirds have been described from marine deposits of the North Pacific. Most of these species are from Middle Miocene through Pliocene (16.0-1.6 Ma) sediments of southern California, although species from Eocene to Early Miocene (52.0-22.0 Ma) deposits are fromJapan,
    [Show full text]