Torture in Russia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Torture in Russia Torture in Russia Cartoon depicting slonik (“elephant”) torture: see page 26 © Magadan Group, International “This man-made Hell” Society for Human Rights INTRODUCTION Amnesty International April 1997 AI Index: EUR 46/04/97 2 Torture in Russia: “This man-made Hell” “We don’t have torture here; (“elephant”), beatings, and special methods of it’s prohibited by law. And in physical restraint, known as lastochka (“swallow”). fact, we have never had Under the guise of fighting crime, there is a torture in Russia. No, there tendency to expand the powers of security and is no torture...” law enforcement agencies to the detriment of constitutional rights and guarantees. Colonel Leonid Golovnyov, Deputy head of the Department on Information, MVD of the Russian Federation, 1996 On 12 November 1996 the United Nations (UN) Committee against Torture in Geneva examined the Second Periodic Report of the Russian Federation under the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (Convention against Torture). i Amnesty International urged the Russian Government to implement the recommendations of the UN Committee against Torture. Amnesty International had submitted its own report to the members of the Committee detailing its concerns about allegations of systematic and widespread use of torture and ill-treatment in Russia. In addition, this current report was submitted to the members of the Committee in a draft form in order to brief them on particular individual cases of concern to Amnesty International and give them a solid background information regarding the practice of torture and ill-treatment of suspects in the Russian Federation. The human rights organization also held a meeting with the Russian delegation in Geneva in which measures planned by the authorities were discussed. Amnesty International has received numerous reports of torture and ill-treatment of criminal suspects in police custody throughout the Russian Federation, and within the context of the conflict in Chechnya. Members of ethnic minorities are particularly vulnerable. There is an apparent pattern of ill-treatment of detainees who are members of ethnic minorities, specifically ethnic Chechens and those from the Caucasus, by the law enforcement officials in Moscow, the capital, and other parts of Russia. The torture methods used by the police officers include asphyxiation, known in Russian as slonik AI Index: EUR 46/04/97 Amnesty International April 1997 Torture in Russia: “This man-made Hell” 3 The findings of the Committee against committed by the military forces of the Torture confirmed Amnesty International´s Russian Federation and Chechen concerns: soldiers have been brutalized by older separatists with a view to bringing to soldiers and officers in the army without the justice those against whom there is authorities taking appropriate remedial measures; evidence of their involvement or complicity the authorities have failed to establish an effective in such acts. machinery for the prompt examination of prisoners’ complaints; the process of harmonizing The information in this report is based domestic legislation with human rights is on various sources, including two visits to progressing slowly; the police and prison Russia by Amnesty International delegates to personnel lack training; people facing extradition interview victims of torture and ill-treatment and do not enjoy appropriate safeguards; the visit penal institutions.1 widespread reported abuses of human rights in the conflict in Chechnya, including torture, are not being investigated promptly and effectively. Amnesty International strongly supports the recommendation of the Committee that the Russian Federation adopt a comprehensive action plan to stop torture. The plan includes: the criminalization of torture expediting the process of training of personnel, including medical personnel, of all agencies engaged in the enforcement of the law and detention of prisoners; the adoption of programs to inform detainees and the public of their rights and the legal means to protect them; the establishment of an effective machinery to monitor the conditions under which investigations of crimes are conducted, the conditions under which persons are held in custody and conditions in prisons; the establishment of an appropriate process 1 During a July 1996 visit to Russia Amnesty for the prompt investigation of complaints International delegates gathered an extensive number of of suspects, detainees and prisoners and the personal testimonies and interviewed victims of torture prosecution of the offenders; and ill-treatment. A representative of the organization the radical improvement of conditions in visited the pre-trial detention centre (SIZO) No. 60-1 and prisons; the corrective labour colony in the town of Ryazan, which the abolition of acts, rules and regulations for the first time had opened their doors to human rights allowing remand in custody for longer than monitors. In Moscow, Amnesty International visited SIZO 48 hours without judicial authorization; No. 2 at the Butyrka prison and the City Department of the abolition of acts, rules and regulations Internal Affairs No. 40. A number of interviews with limiting access to legal assistance; and victims of alleged torture and ill-treatment were the establishment of an independent conducted in Moscow, St. Petersburg and Ryazan. Information on ill-treatment had also been gathered committee to investigate allegations of during an earlier visit by Amnesty International to Siberia torture and inhuman or degrading treatment in December 1995. Amnesty International April 1997 AI Index: EUR 46/04/97 4 Torture in Russia: “This man-made Hell” 4 I. organized crime” , and urged the President CURRENT LEGISLATION to rescind it, on the grounds that it conflicts FACILITATING TORTURE AND with international human rights standards and the Russian Constitution and facilitates ILL-TREATMENT torture and ill-treatment.5 The organization has called on the President to order, as a “I am all for the violation of human rights matter of urgency, a thorough and impartial if the human is a bandit or a criminal”. investigation into all human rights violations Sergey Stepashin in 1994, then head of the FSB and abuses, including allegations of torture commenting on the Presidential Decree on fighting and ill-treatment by law enforcement organized crime No 1226 officials while conducting investigations, arrests and interrogations, and specifically The Russian Federation is a party to the those which occurred under the provisions of Convention against Torture, and to the the presidential decree on fighting organized International Covenant on Civil and Political crime. 2 Rights (ICCPR) and its first Optional Protocol. The presidential decree allows law Both these treaties prohibit the use of torture and enforcement authorities to detain persons other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or suspected of ties to organized crime for up to punishment. The 1993 Russian Constitution 30 days without charge and without access provides in Article 21 (2) that "no one shall be subjected to torture, violence or other cruel or to a lawyer or to the outside world. This degrading treatment or punishment. No one may conflicts with Article 22 of the Russian be subjected to medical, scientific or other Constitution which provides that a person experiments without voluntary consent".3 may not be held for more than 48 hours Nevertheless, new legislation continued before a court rules on the legality of the to be enacted by the State Duma (the lower detention. Article 9 of the ICCPR states that house of the Russian Parliament) or promulgated “anyone who is arrested or detained on a by the President, and old legislation has criminal charge shall be brought promptly remained in force, which facilitates the before a judge”, and that “anyone who is occurrence of acts of torture and ill-treatment. deprived of his liberty by arrest or detention shall be entitled to take proceedings before a 1. Presidential Decree No. 1226 of 14 court, in order that that court may decide June 1994 without delay on the lawfulness of his detention and order his release if the For some time Amnesty International has detention is not lawful”. The presidential expressed concern about Presidential Decree decree also does not guarantee the right of No. 1226 of 14 June 1994,“Urgent the accused to access to a defence counsel measures to defend the population from during the period spent in detention. Prompt banditry and other manifestations of access to a defence lawyer of one’s own 2 The USSR acceded to the Optional Protocol formally in July 1991. The Russian 4 Federation is bound as a successor state to both the ICCPR and the Optional ____ Protocol. __________ __________ _________ _ 1226 _ 14 ____ 1994, “_ __________ 3 _____ __ ______ _________ __ __________ _ ____ __________ ______________ As one of the leading experts and promoters of the Russian legal reform, Sergey Pashin, ____________”. noted in 1995, "people in a lawless state (which Russia still is) suffer more from arbitrary 5 enforcement of the law and misapplications of proper legal norms than from See, the forenactment example, of Open bad letter from Amnesty International to the presidential candidates laws". on the occasion of the 16 June 1996 Presidential Elections, AI Index: EUR 46/29/96. AI Index: EUR 46/04/97 Amnesty International April 1997 Torture in Russia: “This man-made Hell” 5 choice is recognized as an essential decree, about 14,000 people were detained safeguard in international standards such as for up to 30 days without being charged.7 Principles 15, 17 and 18 of the UN Body of Principles for the Protection of All Persons 2. Presidential Decrees No. 1815 of 2 under Any Form of Detention or November 1993 and No. 1025 of 10 July Imprisonment (Body of Principles) and 1996 Principle 7 of the UN Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers. Amnesty International has In addition to Decree No. 1226 on fighting found that denial of such access to a lawyer, organized crime, on 10 July 1996 the Russian family and medical practitioner is one of the President signed a new Decree No.
Recommended publications
  • The Arrest and Detention of Alexei Navalny in January 2021
    http://assembly.coe.int Doc. 15270 19 April 2021 The arrest and detention of Alexei Navalny in January 2021 Report1 Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights Rapporteur: Mr Jacques MAIRE, France, Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Summary Alexei Navalny was arrested and detained in January 2021 for having breached the terms of a suspended sentence passed in the so-called Yves Rocher case. In February 2021, he was sentenced to two years and eight months in prison. The European Court of Human Rights (the Court) has ruled that Mr Navalny’s conviction in the Yves Rocher case violated his right to a fair trial and the prohibition on punishment without law, and called for the domestic courts to remedy these violations. The Russian Supreme Court reopened the case but maintained the verdict and sentence. The Committee of Ministers has called for Mr Navalny’s conviction to be quashed and for him to be released without delay. The European Court of Human Rights has also granted an interim measure requiring the Russian authorities to release Mr Navalny. The committee notes with concern that Mr Navalny’s health has deteriorated significantly in detention, in possible violation of the prohibition on inhuman treatment or punishment; that other aspects of his detention conditions raise further issues under the European Convention on Human Rights; and that his complaints about these issues have gone largely unanswered. The committee therefore proposes that the Assembly express its support for the position of the Committee of Ministers; call on the Russian Federation to co-operate towards full execution of the Court’s judgment, to release Mr Navalny, and pending that to provide him with all necessary medical care and ensure full respect for his rights; invite the Committee for the Prevention of Torture or Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) to visit Mr Navalny’s place of detention; and call on the Russian delegation to co-operate with follow-up to the Assembly’s resolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee of Ministers Secrétariat Du Comité Des Ministres
    SECRETARIAT / SECRÉTARIAT SECRETARIAT OF THE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS SECRÉTARIAT DU COMITÉ DES MINISTRES Contact: Zoë Bryanston-Cross Tel: 03.90.21.59.62 Date: 07/05/2021 DH-DD(2021)474 Documents distributed at the request of a Representative shall be under the sole responsibility of the said Representative, without prejudice to the legal or political position of the Committee of Ministers. Meeting: 1406th meeting (June 2021) (DH) Communication from NGOs (Public Verdict Foundation, HRC Memorial, Committee against Torture, OVD- Info) (27/04/2021) in the case of Lashmankin and Others v. Russian Federation (Application No. 57818/09). Information made available under Rule 9.2 of the Rules of the Committee of Ministers for the supervision of the execution of judgments and of the terms of friendly settlements. * * * * * * * * * * * Les documents distribués à la demande d’un/e Représentant/e le sont sous la seule responsabilité dudit/de ladite Représentant/e, sans préjuger de la position juridique ou politique du Comité des Ministres. Réunion : 1406e réunion (juin 2021) (DH) Communication d'ONG (Public Verdict Foundation, HRC Memorial, Committee against Torture, OVD-Info) (27/04/2021) dans l’affaire Lashmankin et autres c. Fédération de Russie (requête n° 57818/09) [anglais uniquement] Informations mises à disposition en vertu de la Règle 9.2 des Règles du Comité des Ministres pour la surveillance de l'exécution des arrêts et des termes des règlements amiables. DH-DD(2021)474: Rule 9.2 Communication from an NGO in Lashmankin and Others v. Russia. Document distributed under the sole responsibility of its author, without prejudice to the legal or political position of the Committee of Ministers.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian NGO Shadow Report on the Observance of the Convention
    Russian NGO Shadow Report on the Observance of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment by the Russian Federation for the period from 2001 to 2005 Moscow, May 2006 CONTENT Introduction .......................................................................................................................................4 Summary...........................................................................................................................................5 Article 2 ..........................................................................................................................................14 Measures taken to improve the conditions in detention facilities .............................................14 Measures to improve the situation in penal institutions and protection of prisoners’ human rights ..........................................................................................................................................15 Measures taken to improve the situation in temporary isolation wards of the Russian Ministry for Internal Affairs and other custodial places ..........................................................................16 Measures taken to prevent torture and cruel and depredating treatment in work of police and other law-enforcement institutions ............................................................................................16 Measures taken to prevent cruel treatment in the armed forces ................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • Situation of LGBT People in Ukraine Overview
    0 Situation of LGBT People in Ukraine Overview Prepared by LGBT Human Rights NASH MIR Center Website: www.gay.org.ua E-mail: [email protected] Tel./fax: +380 44 296-34-24 Postal address: P.O. Box 173, Kyiv, 02100, UKRAINE Contact person: Andriy Maymulakhin, Coordinator © Nash Mir Center, 2013 Permission is granted for free use of the information, provided reference to the source is shown. The report is available on Nash Mir Center’s website www.gay.org.ua in "Publications" section. 1 Contents HISTORICAL CONTEXT ................................................................................................................................................. 1 GENERAL INFORMATION ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 LGBT HISTORY OF UKRAINE ................................................................................................................................................. 3 MODERN SITUATION OF LGBT PEOPLE IN UKRAINE .................................................................................................... 4 LGBT COMMUNITY............................................................................................................................................................. 4 LGBT AND FRIENDLY NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS .................................................................................................... 5 GAY BUSINESS, ENTERTAINMENT .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Looming Crisis
    FOREIGN POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Russia’s Looming Crisis By David Satter Russia’s Looming Crisis By David Satter March 2012 About FPRI - - - Founded in 1955 by Ambassador Robert Strausz Hupé, FPRI is a non partisan,- non profit organization devoted to bringing the insights of scholarship to bear on the development of policies that advance U.S. national interests. In the tradition of Strausz Hupé, FPRI embraces history and geography to illuminate foreign policy challenges facing the United States. In 1990, FPRI established the Wachman Center to foster civic and international literacy in the community and in the classroom. FOREIGN POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE 19102-3684 Tel. 215-732- -732-4401 1528 Walnut Street, Suite 610 • Philadelphia, PA 3774 • Fax 215 Email [email protected] • Website: www.fpri.org Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 1. The Political Situation ........................................................................................................ 3 The Control of the Election Process ............................................................................................ 4 The Economic Key to Putin’s Political Success ....................................................................... 5 A Political Charade ............................................................................................................................ 6 An Election Fraud .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Russian NGO Shadow Report on the Observance of the Convention
    Russian NGO Shadow Report on the Observance of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment by the Russian Federation for the period from 2012 to 2018 June, Moscow 2018 This Joint Report on the Observance of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment by the Russian Federation for the period from 2012 to 2018 was prepared jointly by the leading Russian NGOs, including: Public Verdict Foundation, Civic Assistance Committee, Memorial Human Rights Center, OVD-info, Soldiers' Mothers of Saint Petersburg, Independent Psychiatric Association, Human Rights Institute, Stichting Justice Initiative, STAKS Expert and Legal Group, Psychologists for civil society, Citizens Commission on Human Rights in Russia, Urals Human Rights Group, Legal Basis Association, Interregional Center of Human Rights, Memorial Anti- Discrimination Center, Social Partnership Foundation, Russia behind the bars, the Foundation "In defense of the rights of prisoners", Movement for Human Rights and experts: Natalya Lutaya, former member of Kaliningrad Public Oversight Commission and Lyudmila Alpern, former member of Moscow Public Oversight Commission. The Public Verdict Foundation was responsible for coordination of work over the Report, systematizing and editing the Report materials. This Report is submitted to the UN Committee against Torture within the framework of its examination of the Russia's Sixth Periodic Report on implementation of the Convention against Torture. The Report is aimed at comprehensively tackling the issues of observing in Russia the rights enshrined in the Convention and at drawing the Committee experts‘ attention to the most burning problems in the sphere of these rights realization, which have not been reflected in the Russian Federation Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Places of Detention in the Russian Federation
    HONORARY CHAIRMAN ADVISORY BOARD (CHAIR) PRESIDENT Yuri Orlov Karl von Schwarzenberg Ludmilla Alexeyeva EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE VICE PRESIDENT Aaron Rhodes Sonja Biserko Ulrich Fischer DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Holly Cartner TREASURER Bjørn Engesland Brigitte Dufour Stein-Ivar Aarsæther Krassimir Kanev Andrzej Rzeplinski Wickenburgg. 14/7, A-1080 Vienna, Austria; Tel +43-1-408 88 22; Fax 408 88 22-50 e-mail: [email protected] – internet: http://www.ihf-hr.org Bank account: Bank Austria Creditanstalt, 0221-00283/00, BLZ 12 000 PLACES OF DETENTION IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION Report from the visit of the delegation of human rights NGOs to places of detention in the Russian Federation on 19 and 20 February 2004 Published by: Bulgarian Helsinki Committee Moscow Helsinki Group Hungarian Helsinki Group Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights in Poland Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in the Republic of Macedonia Greek Helsinki Monitor International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights Sofia, Vienna, Moscow, October 2004 The IHF has consultative status with the United Nations and the Council of Europe. MEMBER AND COOPERATING* COMMITTEES IN: Albania – Austria – Azerbaijan - Belarus – Bosnia-Herzegovina – Bulgaria – Canada – Croatia – Czech Republic – Denmark – Finland – France – Georgia* Germany – Greece – Hungary – Italy – Kazakhstan – Kosovo – Kyrgyzstan – Latvia – Lithuania – Macedonia – Moldova – Montenegro – The Netherlands Norway – Poland – Romania – Russia – Serbia – Slovakia – Slovenia – Sweden – Switzerland – Ukraine* – United Kingdom – United States – Uzbekistan* COOPERATING ORGANIZATIONS: The European Roma Rights Center – Human Rights Without Frontiers – Mental Disability Advocacy Center Note: This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Community. The views expressed herein are those of the publishers, and can therefore in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Sanctions Notice 22/07/2020
    FINANCIAL REPORTING AUTHORITY (CAYFIN) Delivery Address: th Mailing Address: 133 Elgin Ave, 4 Floor P.O. Box 1054 Government Administrative Building Grand Cayman KY1-1102 Grand Cayman CAYMAN ISLANDS CAYMAN ISLANDS Direct Tel No. (345) 244-2394 Tel No. (345) 945-6267 Fax No. (345) 945-6268 Email: [email protected] Financial Sanctions Notice 22/07/2020 Global Human Rights Introduction 1. On 6 July 2020, the Foreign Secretary laid before Parliament the Global Human Rights Sanctions Regulations 2020 (S.I. 680/2020) (the Regulations). The Regulations are made under the Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Act 2018 (the Sanctions Act) and provide for the freezing of funds and economic resources of certain persons, entities or bodies responsible for or involved in serious violations of human rights. 2. With effect from 22 July 2020, the Global Human Rights Sanctions (Overseas Territories) Order 2020 (S.I. 2020/773) extends with modifications the Regulations as amended from time to time to all British overseas territories except Bermuda and Gibraltar (which implement sanctions under their own legislative arrangements). Section 63(3)(c) of the Sanctions Act provides that Her Majesty may by Order in Council provide for any provision of Part 1 of that Act, or any regulations under Part 1 of that Act, to extend with or without modifications to any of the British overseas territories. Section 63(4) provides that this includes the power to extend any regulations as amended from time to time. 2. The Foreign and Commonwealth Office have published the UK Sanctions List on GOV.UK. This list includes details of all sanctions enacted under the Sanctions Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Yuri Glazov Gorbachev Is Gone, Yeltsin ... ? for Many Years The
    Yuri Glazov Gorbachev is Gone, Yeltsin ...? For many years the collapse of the Soviet empire had been seen by several observers as almost inevitable. Nevertheless, the incredible events which took place in Eastern Europe over the last five or six years outpaced our most daring and seemingly irresponsible predictions. Who indeed could anticipate, with any certainty, even twenty or twenty-five months earlier that in the final month of the summer of 1991 the Soviet Communist Party, "the intelligence, honour and conscience of our epoch," would be declared outlawed, the immensely powerful Soviet Union would be shattered, and President Gorbachev would be ousted in disgrace from his office soon after the enigmatic coup of 1991,1 while its major agents and co-partners, including the former Soviet Prime Minister and the KGB chairman, would be thrown into the Matrosskaya Tishina jail pending the trial now awaited with avidity. The huge empire has been intimidating the world for many decades with its "invincible" army and nuclear missiles. The Soviet ideological machine never stopped boasting about its superior philosophers and writers, ballerinas and chess masters, hockey players and mathematicians. Soviet spaceships could successfully compete with American ones, while attracting the world's delighted attention. At the same time many millions of Soviet citizens felt afraid even to murmur a word of criticism of or displeasure with their own authorities. Many thousands of people living beyond the Soviet borders, proud of the Soviet victories, never concealed their dissatisfaction with those scholars and students who risked underrating "the first socialist country's" achievements and unparalleled contribution to global civilization.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights in Russia: the Impact of Economic Sanctions And
    University of Utah UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH JOURNAL HUMAN RIGHTS IN RUSSIA: THE IMPACT OF ECONOMIC SANCTIONS AND GLOBALIZATION Kathryn Loden Howards Lehman, Ph.D. Department of Political Science Abstract The Sergei Magnitsky Rule of Law Accountability Act of 2012 was designed as a means of punishing individuals and entities who violate human rights, participate in systematic corruption, and fail to uphold the rule of law in Russia. In theory, the Magnitsky Act should improve human rights yet in practice, the economic sanctions and travel bans imposed by the act have done nothing of the sort. Human rights, systematic corruption, and the relationship between the U.S. and Russia have not improved in the years since the implementation of the Magnitsky Act. Instead, all three of these phenomena have declined to unacceptable levels. While it may be too hasty to imply direct causation between the Magnitsky Act of 2012 and the troubling Russo- American relationship that exists today, it is more than fair to suggest that the act has served as one of the dominoes in the line leading to today’s volatile international conflict. The overarching phenomenon that has led to both the Magnitsky Act and the deteriorating Russo-American relationship is globalization; a process that has favored the spread of Western practices and ideologies at the cost of those more traditional to Eastern nations. Analyzing the Russo- American relationship from the context of globalization helps to explain why U.S. efforts have been unsuccessful in improving human rights conditions in Russia. Keywords: Human rights, Russia, United States, Globalization, Economic sanctions ii Table of Contents ABSTRACT ii BACKGROUND 1 HISTORICAL CONTEXT 3 GLOBALIZATION 4 EFFECTIVENESS OF SANCTIONS 7 POLITICAL IMPACT 15 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 21 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORTS 25 a.
    [Show full text]
  • RUSSIA the Russian Federation Has a Centralized Political System, With
    RUSSIA The Russian Federation has a centralized political system, with power concentrated in a president and a prime minister, a weak multiparty political system dominated by the ruling United Russia party, and a bicameral legislature (Federal Assembly). The Federal Assembly consists of a lower house (State Duma) and an upper house (Federation Council). The country has an estimated population of 142 million. Security forces generally reported to civilian authorities; however, in some areas of the Northern Caucasus, there were serious problems with civilian control of security forces. There were numerous reports of governmental and societal human rights problems and abuses during the year. The restrictions on political competition and interference in local and regional elections in ways that restricted citizens' right to change their government continued. There were reports of: attacks on and killings of journalists by unidentified persons for reasons apparently related to their activities; physical abuse by law enforcement officers, particularly in the North Caucasus region; and harsh and often life-threatening prison conditions. Arbitrary detention and politically motivated imprisonments were problems. The government controlled many media outlets and infringed on freedoms of speech and expression, pressured major independent media outlets to abstain from critical coverage, and harassed and intimidated some journalists into practicing self- censorship. The Internet remained by and large free and provided citizens access to an increased amount of information that was not available on state-controlled media. The government limited freedom of assembly, and police at times used violence to prevent groups from engaging in peaceful protest. Rule of law and due process violations remained a problem.
    [Show full text]
  • CONFESSIONS at ANY COST Police Torture in Russia
    CONFESSIONS AT ANY COST Police Torture in Russia Human Rights Watch New York AAA Washington AAA London AAA Brussels Copyright 8 November 1999 Human Rights Watch. All Rights Reserved. Printed in the United States of America. ISBN Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: Addresses for Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th Floor, New York, NY 10118-3299 Tel: (212) 290-4700, Fax: (212) 736-1300, E-mail: [email protected] 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500, Washington, DC 20009 Tel: (202) 612-4321, Fax: (202) 612-4333, E-mail: [email protected] 33 Islington High Street, N1 9LH London, UK Tel: (171) 713-1995, Fax: (171) 713-1800, E-mail: [email protected] 15 Rue Van Campenhout, 1000 Brussels, Belgium Tel: (2) 732-2009, Fax: (2) 732-0471, E-mail:[email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org Listserv address: To subscribe to the list, send an e-mail message to [email protected] with Asubscribe hrw-news@ in the body of the message (leave the subject line blank). Human Rights Watch is dedicated to protecting the human rights of people around the world. We stand with victims and activists to prevent discrimination, to uphold political freedom, to protect people from inhumane conduct in wartime, and to bring offenders to justice. We investigate and expose human rights violations and hold abusers accountable. We challenge governments and those who hold power to end abusive practices and respect international human rights law. We enlist the public and the international community to support the cause of human rights for all.
    [Show full text]