International Human Rights and Humanitarian Law (Cambridge

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

International Human Rights and Humanitarian Law (Cambridge This page intentionally left blank International Human Rights and Humanitarian Law How do international human rights and humanitarian law protect vulnerable individuals in times of peace and of war? Rene´ Provost analyses systemic similarities and differences in the construction of each body of law, showing how they achieve a similar goal. By detailing the dynamics of human rights and humanitarian law, Provost reveals how each performs a task for which it is better suited than the other, and that the fundamentals of both fields remain partly incompatible. This helps us understand why their norms succeed in some ways and fail, at times spectacularly, in others. Provost’s study represents innovative and in-depth research, covering all relevant materials from the UN, ICTY, ICTR, and regional organisations in Europe, Africa and Latin America. This study will be of interest to academics and graduate students in international law and international relations, as well as to legal practitioners in related fields, and NGOs active in human rights. rene´ provost is Associate Professor at the Faculty of Law and the Institute of Comparative Law, McGill University. He has published in the British Yearbook of International Law, the Columbia Journal of Transnational Law and the University of Miami Inter-American Law Review. cambridge studies in international and comparative law This series (established in 1946 by Professors Gutteridge, Hersch Lauterpacht and McNair) is a forum of studies of high quality in the fields of public and private international law and comparative law. Although these are distinct legal subdisciplines, developments since 1946 confirm their interrelationship. Comparative law is increasingly used as a tool in the making of law at national, regional and international levels. Private international law is increasingly affected by international conventions, and the issues faced by classical conflicts rules are increasingly dealt with by substantive harmonisation of law under international auspices. Mixed international arbitrations, especially those involving state economic activity, raise mixed questions of public and private international law. In many fields (such as the protection of human rights and democratic standards, investment guarantees and international criminal law) international and national systems interact. National constitutional arrangements relating to ‘foreign affairs’, and to the implementation of international norms, are a focus of attention. Professor Sir Robert Jennings edited the series from 1981. Following his retirement as General Editor, an editorial board has been created and Cambridge University Press has recommitted itself to the series, affirming its broad scope. The Board welcomes works of a theoretical or interdisciplinary character, and those focusing on new approaches to international or comparative law or conflicts of law. Studies of particular institutions or problems are equally welcome, as are translations of the best work published in other languages. General Editors: Professor James Crawford SC FBA Whewell Professor of International Law, Faculty of Law and Director, Lauterpacht Research Centre for International Law, University of Cambridge Professor John S. Bell FBA Professor of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge Editorial Board: Professor Hilary Charlesworth, University of Adelaide Professor Lori Damrosch, Columbia University Law School Professor John Dugard, Universiteit Leiden Professor Mary-Ann Glendon, Harvard Law School Professor Christopher Greenwood, London School of Economics Professor David Johnston, University of Edinburgh Professor Heinz Kotz,¨ Max-Planck-Institut, Hamburg Professor Donald McRae, University of Ottawa Professor Onuma Yasuaki, University of Tokyo Professor Reinhard Zimmermann, Universitat¨ Regensburg Advisory Committee: Professor Sir D. W. Bowett QC Judge Rosalyn Higgins QC Professor Sir Robert Jennings QC Professor J. A. Jolowicz QC Professor Sir Elihu Lauterpacht QC Professor Kurt Lipstein QC Judge Stephen Schwebel A list of books in the series can be found at the end of this volume International Human Rights and Humanitarian Law Rene´ Provost The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 2RU, UK 40 West 20th Street, New York, NY 10011-4211, USA 477 Williamstown Road, Port Melbourne, VIC 3207, Australia Ruiz de Alarcón 13, 28014 Madrid, Spain Dock House, The Waterfront, Cape Town 8001, South Africa http://www.cambridge.org © René Provost 2004 First published in printed format 2002 ISBN 0-511-04186-1 eBook (netLibrary) ISBN 0-521-80697-6 hardback A mes parents, pour tout Contents Acknowledgmentspagex Tableofcasesxii Tableoftreatiesxviii Tableofotherinternationalinstrumentsxxxiv Introduction1 PART I Normative frameworks Introduction13 1Rightsandproceduralcapacity16 Rights17 Humanrights18 Humanitarianlaw26 Proceduralcapacity42 Substantiverighttoaremedy43 Internationalstanding49 Conclusion54 2Obligationsandresponsibility57 Obligations58 Humanrights58 Humanitarianlaw75 Responsibility102 Roleofresponsibility103 Dutytoprosecute110 ConclusiontoPartI116 vii viii contents PART II Reciprocity Introduction121 3Formation127 Proceduralaspects127 Treatylaw127 Customarylaw130 Objectandpurposeofnorms133 Humanrights133 Humanitarianlaw136 Reservationsandreciprocity140 Humanrights141 Humanitarianlaw146 4Application152 Initialapplicabilityandreciprocity152 Humanrights152 Humanitarianlaw153 Furtherapplicationandreciprocity163 Article60oftheViennaConventionontheLawofTreaties163 Humanrights167 Humanitarianlaw172 5Sanction182 Countermeasures182 Belligerentreprisals183 Countermeasuresandhumanrights201 Individualresponsibility:theruletuquoque227 ConclusiontoPartII236 PART III Application: law and facts Introduction241 6Areasoflegalindeterminacy247 Humanitarianlawofarmedconflict247 Inter-statearmedconflicts248 Nationalliberationarmedconflicts253 Non-internationalarmedconflictsunderProtocolII260 InternalarmedconflictsundercommonArticle3264 Stateofemergencyunderhumanrightslaw269 contents ix 7Legaleffectofcharacterisation277 Self-characterisation278 Humanitarianlaw279 Humanrights284 Conclusion290 Thirdstates292 Politicalorgansofintergovernmentalorganisations296 Characterisationbypoliticalbodies296 Natureandeffectofcharacterisation304 Independentbodies315 Humanrights316 Humanitarianlaw323 ConclusiontoPartIII338 Generalconclusion343 Bibliography351 Index388 Acknowledgments Over the course of writing a book, one accumulates many more debts than can be acknowledged in a few lines. I am grateful to Ian Brownlie, who gave me constant support and advice throughout the course of this project, even after I had left Oxford. My thanks go to Louis Henkin at Columbia Law School, with whom I had my first discussions to ar- ticulate the topic of this work. David Daube and Stefan Riesenfeld at UC Berkeley provided, in very different ways, inspiring models of what academic pursuit should be about. Christine Gray, Benedict Kingsbury, James Crawford and Stephen Toope gave me helpful comments and ad- vice at various stages. St Antony’s College proved a very warm and hospitable place to spend my time in Oxford, for which I am thankful to the Warden, Fellows and staff. The Faculty of Law of McGill University provided, and continues to provide, a collegial, friendly and stimulating environment. I am indebted to the staff of the Bodleian Law Library and the McGill Law Library for accommodating my frequent requests for esoteric books and articles. I am also grateful for the financial support provided by a number of sources, including the Fonds pour la formation de chercheurs et l’aide a` la recherche du Quebec,´ the Centennial Scholarship Fund, the IODE War Memorial Scholarships Fund and the Boulton Trust Fund of McGill University. With Amanda Dickins, Fabien Gelinas,´ Carolina Labarta, David Lametti, Susan Law, Hans Meier, David N’dii, Peter Oliver, Sophie Probert Oliver, Diarmuid Rossa Phelan, Nandini Ramanujam, Genevieve` Saumier, Stephen Smith and Robert Wintemute, I shared much food, wine, whisky, movies, sports, outings and so many other things essential to the production of a work such as this one. J’ai dedi´ ecelivre´ a` mes x acknowledgments xi parents, Jean et Denyse, pour tout ce que j’ai appris et continue d’apprendre d’eux. Finally my greatest debt is owed to Shauna, with- out whom nothing would have been possible ...et pour Daniel Sol et Micah, pour qui rien n’est impossible. Table of cases Abella v. Argentina (‘La Tablada’case) page 157, 199, 333–5 Admission of a State to the United Nations (Advisory Opinion) 311–12, 314 Ahmed v. Austria 61 Air Service Agreement Award 182, 185, 189, 277 Ashby v. White 14 Askoy v. Turkey 287–8, 316 Asylum case 281, 292 Austria v. Italy 134, 145, 168 Avila v. Colombia 333, 335–6 ‘Baby Boy’case 65 Baffico v. Calleri 90, 191 Barbie case 70 Barcelona Traction case 124, 134, 145, 204 Bauer et al. trial 35 Belgium v. Falkenhausen 197 Belilos v. Switzerland 143 Bleier v. Uruguay 113 Bouchelkia v. France 216 Brannigan and McBride v. UK 242, 271, 285, 287–8, 316–17, 323 Bronstein v. Peru 135 Burger-Fischer et al. v. DeGussa AG 46 Caso del Tribunal constitucional 135 Chrysostomos v. Turkey (1991) 19 Civil War Claimants Assoc. Ltd v.R 47 Coard v. United States 20, 335 Commission nationale des droits de l’homme v. Chad 61, 269 Compulsory Membership (Advisory Opinion) 61 xii table of cases xiii Corfu Channel case 197 Cyprus v. Turkey (1975) 19, 20, 21, 285, 333–4 Cyprus v. Turkey (1979) 20 Cysne case 191 Denmark,
Recommended publications
  • Whither Communism: a Comparative Perspective on Constitutionalism in a Postsocialist Cuba Jon L
    University of Florida Levin College of Law UF Law Scholarship Repository UF Law Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 2009 Whither Communism: A Comparative Perspective on Constitutionalism in a Postsocialist Cuba Jon L. Mills University of Florida Levin College of Law, [email protected] Daniel Ryan Koslosky Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons Recommended Citation Jon Mills & Daniel Ryan Koslosky, Whither Communism: A Comparative Perspective on Constitutionalism in a Postsocialist Cuba, 40 Geo. Wash. Int'l L. Rev. 1219 (2009), available at, http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub/522 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at UF Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in UF Law Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UF Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WHITHER COMMUNISM: A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE ON CONSTITUTIONALISM IN A POSTSOCIALIST CUBA JON MILLS* AND DANIEL RYAN KOSLOSIc4 I. INTRODUCTION ........................................ 1220 II. HISTORY AND BACKGROUND ............................ 1222 A. Cuban ConstitutionalLaw .......................... 1223 1. Precommunist Legacy ........................ 1223 2. Communist Constitutionalism ................ 1225 B. Comparisons with Eastern Europe ................... 1229 1. Nationalizations in Eastern Europe ........... 1230 2. Cuban Expropriations ........................ 1231 III. MODES OF CONSTITUTIONALISM: A SCENARIO ANALYSIS. 1234 A. Latvia and the Problem of ConstitutionalInheritance . 1236 1. History, Revolution, and Reform ............. 1236 2. Resurrecting an Ancien Rgime ................ 1239 B. Czechoslovakia and Poland: Revolutions from Below .. 1241 1. Poland's Solidarity ........................... 1241 2. Czechoslovakia's Velvet Revolution ........... 1244 3. New Constitutionalism ....................... 1248 C. Hungary's GradualDecline and Decay ..............
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Rights in the United States: a Conflict of Aluesv
    Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality Volume 5 Issue 2 Article 3 June 1987 Cultural Rights in the United States: A Conflict of aluesV Sharon O'Brien Follow this and additional works at: https://lawandinequality.org/ Recommended Citation Sharon O'Brien, Cultural Rights in the United States: A Conflict of aluesV , 5(2) LAW & INEQ. 267 (1987). Available at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/lawineq/vol5/iss2/3 Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality is published by the University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing. Cultural Rights in the United States: A Conflict of Values Sharon O'Brien* Introduction ................................................... 268 I. Historical Development of Minority Rights ............. 270 Historical Examples of Pluralistic Arrangements ..... 271 International Protection of Group Rights ............. 273 Leading National Examples of Group Rights Protection ............................................. 279 Twentieth-Century Pluralist Thought ................. 281 The United States and the Rights of Minorities ...... 283 Available Constitutional Mechanisms ................. 287 II. Am erican Indians ....................................... 290 Historical Background and Assimilation Efforts ...... 290 Cultural Protection ................................... 296 Freedom of Religion .................................. 298 III. Native Hawaiians ........................................ 308 Historical Background ................................. 308 Cultural Protection ................................... 314 Protection of the
    [Show full text]
  • United States Legal Assistance, American Legal Models, and Legal Change in the Post-Communist World and Beyond
    UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAw Volume 20 Summer 1999 Number 2 ARTICLES LEX AMERICANA?: UNITED STATES LEGAL ASSISTANCE, AMERICAN LEGAL MODELS, AND LEGAL CHANGE IN THE POST-COMMUNIST WORLD AND BEYOND JACQUES DELISLE* 1. INTRODUCTION Asked to provide advice to a Central or Eastern European na- tion drafting its first post-socialist constitution, a prominent American legal academic promptly produces an elaborate manu- script headed "Constitution of the Republic of _ _ " The document is .a form-book charter of economic liberties, liberal rights, democratic governance, and limited governmental powers that awaits only a few strokes of the pen to insert the recipient * Professor of Law, University of Pennsylvania Law School. The author thanks, for their helpful comments, participants in a seminar at the Institute for Advanced Study of the United Nations University (where an earlier ver- sion of this Article was presented) and participants in a session on"importing and exporting legal models," chaired by John Reitz, at the XV International Congress of Comparative Law. The author also thanks Chuck Mooney, Kim Lane Scheppele, Stephen Holmes, and several current and former participants in many o the legal advice projects described in this article for their comments about their experiences with several of the modes of alegal assistance" and "le- gal export" analyzed in this article. Last, but far from the least, the author thanks the staff of theJournalfor heroic work, especially on the footnotes of this article.
    [Show full text]
  • Congress and Genocide: They're Not Going to Get Away with It
    Michigan Journal of International Law Volume 11 Issue 1 1989 Congress and Genocide: They're not Going to Get Away with It Jordan J. Paust University of Houston Law Center Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjil Part of the Criminal Law Commons, International Law Commons, and the Legislation Commons Recommended Citation Jordan J. Paust, Congress and Genocide: They're not Going to Get Away with It, 11 MICH. J. INT'L L. 90 (1989). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjil/vol11/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Michigan Journal of International Law at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Journal of International Law by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CONGRESS AND GENOCIDE:, THEY'RE NOT GOING TO GET AWAY WITH IT Jordan J. Paust * Today at least, it is generally recognized that genocide is a crimen contra omnes, a crime under customary international law' over which * Professor of Law, University of Houston Law Center. 1. See, e.g., RESTATEMENT OF THE FOREIGN RELATIONS LAW OF THE UNITED STATES § 404 and reporters' note 1, § 702, comment d and reporters' note 3 (1987) [hereinafter RE- STATEMENT]; R. ARENS, GENOCIDE IN PARAGUAY 135 (1976); M. BASSIOUNI, A DRAFT IN- TERNATIONAL CRIMINAL CODE AND DRAFT STATUTE FOR AN INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL 25, 28, 41, 57, 119, 142 (1987); F. BOYLE, DEFENDING CIVIL RESISTANCE UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW 31, 46, 53, 92, 101, 103, 139-40, 145, 194, 213, 225, 234, 239, 259-60 (1987); I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bill of Rights and the Emerging Democracies
    SULLIVAN_FMT.DOC 06/12/02 12:23 PM THE BILL OF RIGHTS AND THE EMERGING DEMOCRACIES JACEK KURCZEWSKI* AND BARRY SULLIVAN** I INTRODUCTION The modern bill of rights bears little resemblance to the original American renditions, either in their genesis in the Virginia Constitution of 1776 or their promulgation in the first Ten Amendments to the United States Constitution in 1791. There is universal concurrence that the concept of human rights evolved during the subsequent two cen- turies. There is also universal agreement that America’s Founding Fathers erred in omitting the guarantee of such rights from the 1787 Philadelphia Constitution.1 This statement directs our attention to the longstanding phenomenon of the globalization of rights. Albert Blaustein observes that, of the two constitutions that soon followed the adoption of the United States Constitution of 1787, one—the Polish Constitution of May 3, 1791—followed the American model and contained no bill of rights,2 while the other—the French Constitution of Copyright © 2002 by Jacek Kurczewski and Barry Sullivan This article is also available at http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/65LCPKurczewski. * Vice-Dean and Chair of Sociology of Custom and Law, Institute for Applied Social Sciences, Uni- versity of Warsaw. Deputy Speaker of the Polish Sejm (parliament), 1991-1993. ** Partner, Jenner & Block, Chicago, Illinois; Fulbright Professor, Faculty of Law and Administra- tion, University of Warsaw, Fall Semester 2001. The authors are grateful to Daniel Shim, who provided invaluable assistance in the preparation of this essay for publication. 1. Albert P. Blaustein, Rights, Human Rights and Constitutional Rights, in THE ORIGINS OF HUMAN RIGHTS: PROCEEDINGS AT THE SEMINAR HELD AT NICOLAUS COPERNICUS UNIVERSITY 93-110 (Janusz L.
    [Show full text]
  • Desegregation As a Cold War Imperative
    +(,121/,1( Citation: 41 Stan. L. Rev. 61 1988-1989 Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org) Thu Jul 14 14:45:09 2011 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. -- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your HeinOnline license, please use: https://www.copyright.com/ccc/basicSearch.do? &operation=go&searchType=0 &lastSearch=simple&all=on&titleOrStdNo=0038-9765 Desegregation as a Cold War Imperative Mary L. Dudziak* It is in the context of the present world struggle between freedom and tyranny that the problem of racial discrimination must be viewed. - Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae, Brown v. Board of Education1 I. INTRODUCTION At the height of the McCarthy era, when Congressional committees were exposing "communist infiltration" in many areas of American 3 life,2 the Supreme Court was upholding loyalty oath requirements, * Associate Professor, University of Iowa College of Law. A.B., 1978, University of Cal- ifornia, Berkeley; J.D., 1984, Yale; M.A., M.Phil., 1986, Yale. For their helpful comments and other important support for my work, I am grateful to Brooks Ammerman, Ian Ayres, David Baldus, Derrick Bell, Steve Burton, Richard Buxbaum, Michael Green, Jack Greenberg, Herb Hovenkamp, Carolyn Jones, Laura Kalman, Rick Matasar, and Ellen Schrecker. I would also like to thank those who attended my faculty semi- nars at the Univeristy of Iowa College of Law and Tulane Law School, and my presentation at the 1987 American Society for Legal History Conference.
    [Show full text]
  • Power Ethnicized: the Pursuit of Protection and Participation in Rwanda and Burundi
    Buffalo Journal of International Law Volume 2 Number 1 Article 2 4-1-1995 Power Ethnicized: The Pursuit of Protection and Participation in Rwanda and Burundi Linda Maguire The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/bjil Part of the Human Rights Law Commons, and the Law and Race Commons Recommended Citation Maguire, Linda (1995) "Power Ethnicized: The Pursuit of Protection and Participation in Rwanda and Burundi," Buffalo Journal of International Law: Vol. 2 : No. 1 , Article 2. Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/bjil/vol2/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Buffalo Journal of International Law by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. POWER ETHINICIZED: THE PURSUIT OF PROTECTION AND PARTICIPATION IN RWANDA AND BURUNDI Linda Maguire* The Hutu-Tutsi conflict is a relatively recentphenomenon ... not composed of ancestralhatreds and supposedsupremacy, but of modern politics. Ren6 Lemarchand' There's never been any ethnic conflict between the groups on the level of the village. There was no ethnic war before independence. It's the politi- cians who transfertheir politicalconflicts onto the hillsides. If the leaders say nothing then the killings don't happen. Maj. Pierre Buyoya President of Burundi (1987-1993)2 * Editor-in-Chief, 1994-1995, The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University; Master Degree Candidate 1995 at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy; B.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Extensions of Remarks 27105 Extensions of Remarks
    September 30, 1994 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS 27105 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS THE OSHA PLAGUE Imperial Food Products chicken processing worker." While Al Gore's "Reinventing Gov­ plant in Hamlet, NC, that killed 25 employees ernment" report recommends that OSHA pri­ HON. JOEL HEFLEY and injured an additional 55. vatize its inspection duties to increase effi­ The owner of Imperial Food is currently ciency. OF COLORADO serving a 20-year sentence for manslaughter. Even pro-OSHA rhetoric is strained. Labor IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES He's bankrupt and is facing millions in cor­ Secretary Robert Reich recently patted the Friday, September 30, 1994 porate lawsuits. Meanwhile, $16 million in agency on the head by saying, "According to Mr. HEFLEY. Mr. Speaker, here is the lead worker's compensation has been distributed to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, fatality rates from an article in The Chieftain, the leading the victims and their survivors. have declined since 1971." newspaper in Pueblo, CO: In trying the owner, the prosecutor chose Talk about damning somebody with faint Pueblo's construction boom came to a halt not to use OSHA's criminal penalties because praise. Yes, death rates have been falling this week but not because of the weather, they were too "weak." The State man­ since 1971-they've been falling since 1934- economic, or labor problems. What shut slaughter was chosen instead. and they fell faster before OSHA than they did down many of the new home-building And OSHA itself is being sued by the survi­ after. That's not a recommendation, though, projects in the city and county was word vors urider North Carolina law.
    [Show full text]
  • Suriname-Guyana Maritime and Territorial Disputes: a Legal and Historical Analysis
    SURINAME-GUYANA MARITIME AND TERRITORIAL DISPUTES: A LEGAL AND HISTORICAL ANALYSIS THOMAS W. DONOVAN* Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION .................................. 42 II. DESCRIPTION OF DISPUTED AREAS ................... 43 A. Geography and Indigenous Inhabitants of the New River Triangle ....................... 44 B. Economic Activity ............................. 46 C. Extent of Resources in Disputed Maritime Zone ..... 48 III. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND ......................... 48 A. First European Exploration and Occupation of Area ............................ 49 B. Divergent Surveys of Courantyne: The Schomburgk Expedition and Barrington Brown Survey .......... 53 C. The Brazilian — Guyana — Suriname Tri-point Junction ............................. 56 D. Sovereignty Over the Courantyne River and the 1936 Mixed Commission ................. 57 E. Maritime Boundary and 1958-1962 Negotiations .... 59 F. Independence of Suriname and Guyana from Colonialism ....................... 61 G. Recent Developments and Current State of Bilateral Diplomatic Activities ................... 63 IV. OPERATIVE LEGAL PRINCIPLES ...................... 65 A. The Law of Occupation to Determine Title to the New River Triangle ....................... 67 B. The Principle of Terra Nullius in the New River Triangle ............................ 70 C. The Principle of Uti Possidetis ................... 76 D. Prescription .................................. 80 E. Recognition, Acquiescence, and Estoppel ........... 82 F. Relevant Law to Territorial Sea Delineation,
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Determination, Minority Rights, and Constitutional Accommodation: the Example of the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic
    Michigan Journal of International Law Volume 13 Issue 1 1991 Self-Determination, Minority Rights, and Constitutional Accommodation: The Example of the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic Claudia Saladin University of Michigan Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjil Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, International Law Commons, and the Rule of Law Commons Recommended Citation Claudia Saladin, Self-Determination, Minority Rights, and Constitutional Accommodation: The Example of the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic, 13 MICH. J. INT'L L. 172 (1991). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjil/vol13/iss1/7 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Michigan Journal of International Law at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Journal of International Law by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT NOTES SELF-DETERMINATION, MINORITY RIGHTS, AND CONSTITUTIONAL ACCOMMODATION: THE EXAMPLE OF THE CZECH AND SLOVAK FEDERAL REPUBLIC Claudia Saladin * Perhaps the greatest threat to establishment of stable democracies in Eastern Europe is ethnic tension.I Self-determination and the rights of minorities are especially important issues for these countries be- cause of their ethnically diverse populations. As the following discus- sion will demonstrate, the issues of self-determination and minority rights are closely related to one another and to the issue of democratic legitimacy. Using the example of current constitutional reform and debate in the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic (CSFR), this Note will describe the interrelationship of these issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutions As Commodities Notes on a Theory of Transfer
    CONSTITUTIONS AS COMMODITIES NOTES ON A THEORY OF TRANSFER GÜNTER FRANKENBERG ABSTRACT: Constitutional information comes packaged and refers to institutions, norms, principles, doctrines, and ideologies. And for more than two centuries, not counting the crucial influence of previous basic laws or leges fundamentales, it has crossed national boundaries, social-cultural contexts, and the limits of epistemic communities. Such information has reappeared for application within different constitutional regimes and different political constellations, resulting from the dynamics of social struggles and accommodating specific economic conditions. And the overall result, given the innumerable variations at play, is striking. Constitutions come for the most part in the form of a written document and contain the legal ground rules for life in society: rights and principles, values and duties, provisions for the organization of government and, with regard to the operative quality of the document, ascertaining its authority, openness to interpretive change or legislative amendment, shifting between stability and flexibility... I. CONSTITUTIONS AS COMMODITIES Constitutional information comes packaged and refers to institutions, norms, principles, doctrines, and ideologies. And for more than two centuries, not counting the crucial influence of previous basic laws or leges fundamentales, it has crossed national boundaries, social-cultural contexts, and the limits of epistemic communities. Such information has reappeared for application within different
    [Show full text]
  • Resurrection of the Reprisal and Anticipatory Self-Defense Doctrines in International Law
    TIME WARP TO 1945 — RESURRECTION OF THE REPRISAL AND ANTICIPATORY SELF-DEFENSE DOCTRINES IN INTERNATIONAL LAW MICHAEL J. KELLY* [T]he sole end for which mankind are warranted, individually or collectively, in interfering with the liberty of action of any of their number, is self- protection. John Stuart Mill, On Liberty (1859) Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION ..................................... 1 II. THE REPRISAL DOCTRINE ............................. 3 A. Historic Evolution ............................... 4 B. Dormancy of Reprisal under the U.N. Charter? ....... 12 C. Resurrection of Reprisal Doctrine .................. 19 III.THE ANTICIPATORY SELF-DEFENSE DOCTRINE ........... 22 A. Historic Evolution .............................. 22 B. Dormancy of Preemption under the U.N. Charter? .... 28 C. Resurrection of Anticipatory Self-Defense Doctrine .... 31 IV. CONCLUSION ...................................... 36 I. INTRODUCTION Prior to 1945, the laws and customs of warfare were a commonly understood set of principles and doctrines that governed use of force among states of equivalent and disparate power, be they nation- states, empires, colonial powers or kingdoms. Some of these rules had been reduced to writing in military field manuals, domestic articulations like the Leiber Code, and multilateral treaties like the early Hague Conventions.1 Others were defined and clarified in decisions by judicial tribunals like the Permanent International Court of Justice. Still others remained in the murky netherworld * Assistant Professor of Law, Creighton University. B.A., J.D., Indiana University; LL.M. Georgetown University. Professor Kelly is co-author of Equal Justice in the Balance; Assessing America’s Legal Responses to the Emerging Terrorist Threat (University of Michigan Press 2003). Many thanks to Kate Blanchard, J.D. 2003, an outstanding research assistant, for her diligent efforts in the preparation of this article.
    [Show full text]