Isolation and Characterization of Extreme

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Isolation and Characterization of Extreme ISOLATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF EXTREME HALOALKALIPHILIC BACTERIA AND ARCHAEA FROM LAKE MAGADI, KENYA. EVANS MANYARA NYAKERI MASTER OF SCIENCE (Biotechnology) JOMO KENYATTA UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE AND TECHNOLOGY 2013 Isolation and Characterization of extreme haloalkaliphilic Bacteria and Archaea from Lake Magadi, Kenya. Evans Manyara Nyakeri A Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment for the Degree of Master of Science in Biotechnology in the Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology 2013 DECLARATION This thesis is my original work and has not been presented for a degree in any other University. Signature:........................................... Date:................................................ Evans Manyara Nyakeri This thesis has been submitted for examination with our approval as University supervisors: Signature:........................................... Date:................................................ Prof. Hamadi Iddi Boga JKUAT, Kenya Signature:........................................... Date:................................................ Dr. Romano Mwirichia JKUAT, Kenya ii DEDICATION This work is dedicated to my beloved wife Susan, who despite the loneliness occasioned by my absence, not only trusted and believed in me and gave me the impetus to go on. To my Lovely children Bless Evan Misiga, Praise Moraa and Gift Favour, for whom I do endeavour to live and strive. To my loving parents Emmanuel and Bilha, who encouraged and supported me all through to this level of education. To uncle Edward for hosting me and being patient with me even when no progress was forthcoming. Above all to God, the creator of all beings, who provided the strength, health and favor to enable me see this output. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am deeply indebted to all my supervisors, Prof. Hamadi Boga and Dr. Romano Mwirichia, for the guidance, encouragement and correction that they provided throughout the study period. I thank all my colleagues at Institute for Biotechnology Research, especially Dan Kwalimwa and Kevin Omolo Mbogo, for helping me out on occassions that called for giving up and creating a friendly working environment in the laboratory during the carrying out of this work. I thank Dr. Romano Mwirichia, and Mr Richard Rotich, for their invaluable guidance on molecular work. To you all, I say God speed. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION..................................................................................................................II DEDICATION.....................................................................................................................III ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS................................................................................................IV TABLE OF CONTENTS.....................................................................................................V LIST OF TABLES................................................................................................................X LIST OF FIGURES............................................................................................................XI LIST OF PLATES.............................................................................................................XII LIST OF APPENDICES..................................................................................................XIII LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS..........................................................................................XVI ABSTRACT........................................................................................................................XV CHAPTER ONE....................................................................................................................1 1.0 INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................1 1.1 Extremophilic microorganisms..............................................................................1 1.2 Halophilic habitats.................................................................................................2 1.3 Halophilic microorganisms....................................................................................3 1.4 Haloalkaliphiles.....................................................................................................5 1.5 Adaptations of extreme halophiles and haloalkaliphiles.......................................6 1.6 Biotechnological applications of halophiles and haloalkaliphiles.........................8 1.7 Statement of the problem.....................................................................................11 1.8 Justification of the study......................................................................................11 v 1.9 Hypothesis...........................................................................................................13 1.10 Objectives..........................................................................................................13 1.10.1 General objectives....................................................................................13 1.10.2 Specific objectives....................................................................................13 CHAPTER TWO................................................................................................................14 2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW.............................................................................................14 2.1 Soda lake enviroments........................................................................................14 2.2 Microbial biodiversity and productivity of soda lakes........................................15 2.3 The role of haloalkaliphiles in soda lakes............................................................19 CHAPTER THREE............................................................................................................23 3.0 MATERIALS AND METHODS..................................................................................23 3.1 Study site: Lake Magadi......................................................................................23 3.2 Sampling..............................................................................................................24 3.3 Enrichment and isolation.....................................................................................25 3.4 Characterization and identification of isolates....................................................26 3.4.1 Morphological characterization............................................................26 3.4.2 Physiological characterization..............................................................27 3.4.2.1 Salt tolerance test............................................................................27 3.4.2.2 Temperature tolerance test..............................................................27 3.4.2.3 Growth at different pH values........................................................28 3.5 Screening for enzyme production........................................................................28 vi 3.5.1 Cellulase production.............................................................................28 3.5.2 Xylanase production.............................................................................29 3.5.3 Amylase production..............................................................................29 3.5.4 Lipase production.................................................................................30 3.5.5 Protease production..............................................................................30 3.5.6 Esterase production...............................................................................31 3.6 Biochemical characterization...............................................................................31 3.6.1 Catalase test..........................................................................................31 3.6.2 Oxidase test...........................................................................................32 3.6.3 Nitrate reduction...................................................................................33 3.6.4 Gelatin liquefaction/hydrolysis.............................................................33 3.6.5 Amino acid utilization..........................................................................34 3.6.5.1 L-arginine.......................................................................................34 3.6.5.2 L-lysine...........................................................................................34 3.6.5.3 L-ornithine......................................................................................35 3.6.6 Methyl Red Voges-Proskauer (MR-VP) test........................................35 3.6.7 Indole production and hydrogen sulfide production tests.....................36 3.6.8 Citrate utilization..................................................................................37 3.6.9 Urease test.............................................................................................37 3.7 Molecular characterization..................................................................................38 3.7.1 DNA extraction.....................................................................................38 vii 3.7.2 Polymerase chain reaction....................................................................39 3.7.3 Purification PCR products....................................................................39 3.7.4 Phylogenetic data
Recommended publications
  • Bacterial Ecology of Abattoir Wastewater Treated by an Anaerobic
    Bacterial ecology of abattoir wastewater treated by an anaerobic digestor Linda Jabari, Hana Gannoun, Eltaief Khelifi, Jean-Luc Cayol, Jean-Jacques Godon, Moktar Hamdi, Marie-Laure Fardeau To cite this version: Linda Jabari, Hana Gannoun, Eltaief Khelifi, Jean-Luc Cayol, Jean-Jacques Godon, et al.. Bacterial ecology of abattoir wastewater treated by an anaerobic digestor. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia, 2016, 47 (1), pp.73-84. 10.1016/j.bjm.2015.11.029. hal- 02633155 HAL Id: hal-02633155 https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02633155 Submitted on 27 May 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. b r a z i l i a n j o u r n a l o f m i c r o b i o l o g y 4 7 (2 0 1 6) 73–84 h ttp://www.bjmicrobiol.com.br/ Environmental Microbiology Bacterial ecology of abattoir wastewater treated by an anaerobic digestor a,b a,c a b Linda Jabari , Hana Gannoun , Eltaief Khelifi , Jean-Luc Cayol , d a b,∗ Jean-Jacques Godon , Moktar Hamdi , Marie-Laure Fardeau a Université de Carthage, Laboratoire d’Ecologie et de Technologie Microbienne, Institut National des Sciences Appliquées et de Technologie (INSAT), 2 Boulevard de la terre, B.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Wo 2010/096550 A2
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date 26 August 2010 (26.08.2010) WO 2010/096550 A2 (51) International Patent Classification: (74) Agents: SALIWANCHIK, David, R. et al; Saliwanchik, C12N 1/20 (2006.01) A61K 35/74 (2006.01) Lloyd & Saliwanchik, P.O. Box 142950, Gainesville, FL A23C 9/123 (2006.01) C12R 1/225 (2006.01) 32614-2950 (US). (21) International Application Number: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every PCT/US2010/024575 kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BR, BW, BY, BZ, (22) International Filing Date: CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, DO, 18 February 2010 (18.02.2010) DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, (25) Filing Language: English HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KM, KN, KP, KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, (26) Publication Language: English ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, (30) Priority Data: NO, NZ, OM, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, RO, RS, RU, SC, SD, 61/153,5 16 18 February 2009 (18.02.2009) US SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, 61/297,480 22 January 2010 (22.01 .2010) US TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (71) Applicant (for all designated States except US): UNI¬ (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every VERSITY OF FLORIDA RESEARCH FOUNDA¬ kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, TION, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2014/135633 Al 12 September 2014 (12.09.2014) P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization I International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2014/135633 Al 12 September 2014 (12.09.2014) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every C12N 9/04 (2006.01) C12P 7/16 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, C12N 9/88 (2006.01) AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, (21) Number: International Application DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, PCT/EP2014/054334 HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, (22) International Filing Date: KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, 6 March 2014 (06.03.2014) MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, (25) Filing Language: English SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, (26) Publication Language: English TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (30) Priority Data: 13 158012.8 6 March 2013 (06.03.2013) EP (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, (71) Applicants: CLARIANT PRODUKTE (DEUTSCH- GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, SZ, TZ, LAND) GMBH [DE/DE]; Briiningstrasse 50, 65929 UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU, TJ, Frankfurt am Main (DE).
    [Show full text]
  • Lotus Seed Oligosaccharides at Various Dosages with Prebiotic Activity Regulate Gut Microbiota and Relieve Constipation in Mice T
    Food and Chemical Toxicology 134 (2019) 110838 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Food and Chemical Toxicology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foodchemtox Lotus seed oligosaccharides at various dosages with prebiotic activity regulate gut microbiota and relieve constipation in mice T Han Sua,d,e, Jinghao Chena,d,e, Song Miaob,a,d, Kaibo Denga,b,c,d,e, Jiawen Liua, ∗∗ ∗ Shaoxiao Zenga,c,d,e, , Baodong Zhenga,c,d,e,XuLua,b,c,d,e, a College of Food Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 15 Shangxiadian Road, 350002, Fuzhou, China b Teagasc Food Research Centre, Food Chemistry and Technology Department, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co.Cork, Ireland c Institute of Food Science and Technology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 18 Simon Pit Road, 350002, Fuzhou, China d China-Ireland International Cooperation Center for Food Material Science and Structure Design, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 350002, Fuzhou, China e Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Quality Science and Processing Technology in Special Starch, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, China ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of lotus seed oligosaccharides (formulation consisting of LSO2, Lotus seeds LSO3-1, LSO3-2 and LSO4; relative ratios are 1.107:0.554:0.183:0.443, m/m/m/m) at dosages of 0.42, 0.83 g/d/ Oligosaccharides kg bw and 2.49 g/d/kg bw on the microbiota composition and the propulsion of intestinal contents in the gut of Resistant starch mice. The results showed that fecal water content increased in treated mice; there was less gut microbiota Gut microbiota diversity than in other groups; and there was a large number of fauna in the cecum of the mice.
    [Show full text]
  • Patent ( 10 ) Patent No
    US010363308B2 (12 ) United States Patent ( 10 ) Patent No. : US 10 , 363, 308 B2 Clube et al. ( 45 ) Date of Patent: * Jul. 30 , 2019 ( 54 ) SELECTIVELY ALTERING MICROBIOTA (58 ) Field of Classification Search FOR IMMUNE MODULATION CPC . .. A61K 39 /3955 ; A61K 39 /0011 ; A61K 31/ 7105 ; A61K 2039 /505 ; A61P 37 /00 ; A61P 35 /00 ; A61N 1 /360002 (71 ) Applicant: SNIPR Technologies Limited , London See application file for complete search history . (GB ) ( 56 ) References Cited (72 ) Inventors : Jasper Clube , London (GB ); Morten U . S . PATENT DOCUMENTS Sommer , Copenhagen Ø ( DK ) ; 4 ,626 , 504 A 12 / 1986 Puhler et al. Christian Grøndahl, Copenhagen Ø 5 ,633 , 154 A 5 / 1997 Schaefer et al. 8 , 241, 498 B2 8 / 2012 Summer et al . ( DK ) 8 , 252 , 576 B2 8 / 2012 Campbell et al. 8 , 906 ,682 B2 12 /2014 June et al. ( 73 ) Assignee : SNIPR Technologies Limited , London 8 , 911 , 993 B2 12 / 2014 June et al . 8 ,916 ,381 B1 12 /2014 June et al . (GB ) 8 ,975 ,071 B1 3 /2015 June et al . 9 , 101, 584 B2 8 / 2015 June et al . 9 , 102 ,760 B2 8 / 2015 June et al . ( * ) Notice : Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 9 , 102 ,761 B2 8 / 2015 June et al. patent is extended or adjusted under 35 9 , 113 ,616 B2 8 / 2015 MacDonald et al. U . S . C . 154 ( b ) by 0 days. 9 , 328 , 156 B2 5 / 2016 June et al . 9 ,464 , 140 B2 10 /2016 June et al . 9 ,481 , 728 B2 11/ 2016 June et al.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,474,773 B2 Neu Et Al
    US009474773B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,474,773 B2 Neu et al. (45) Date of Patent: Oct. 25, 2016 (54) LACTOBACILLUS SUPPLEMENT FOR (52) U.S. Cl. ALLEVIATING TYPE 1 DABETES CPC ........... A61K 35/747 (2013.01); A23C 9/1234 (2013.01); A23C 19/0323 (2013.01); A23G (75) Inventors: Josef Neu, Gainesville, FL (US); 9/363 (2013.01); A23L I/3014 (2013.01); Graciela Liliana Lorca, Gainesville, CI2N 1/20 (2013.01); A23 V 2002/00 FL (US); Eric W. Triplett, Gainesville, (2013.01); FL (US); Mark A. Atkinson, (Continued) Gainesville, FL (US). Desmond A. (58) Field of Classification Search Schatz, Gainesville, FL (US) None See application file for complete search history. (73) Assignee: UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC., (56) References Cited Gainesville, FL (US) U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 5,200,318 A * 4/1993 Rabin .................. GON 33.564 patent is extended or adjusted under 35 435/4 U.S.C. 154(b) by 8 days. 5,556,785 A 9/1996 Kishida (21) Appl. No.: 13/144,028 (Continued) FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS (22) PCT Filed: Feb. 18, 2010 WO WO 2004O76615 A2 * 9, 2004 (86). PCT No.: PCT/US2010/0245.75 WO WO 2008, 141989 11/2008 S 371 (c)(1), (2), (4) Date: Oct. 4, 2011 OTHER PUBLICATIONS Takeshi Matsuzaki, Yuriko Nagata, Shouichi Kado, Kazumi Uchida. (87) PCT Pub. No.: WO2010/096550 Ikuo Kato, Shusuke Hashimoto and Teruo Yokokura, Prevention of PCT Pub. Date: Aug. 26, 2010 onset in an insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus model, NOD mice, by oral feeding of Lactobacillus casei, 1997, Acta Pathologica, (65) Prior Publication Data Microbiologica et Immunological Scandinavica, vol.
    [Show full text]
  • References Associated with K. Bernard's Excel File Called “Review of Clostridium April 18 2017” NOTE: Many Older Species C
    References Associated with K. Bernard’s Excel file called “Review of Clostridium April 18 2017” NOTE: Many older species cited in the Excel file are solely linked to ref 1 (Collins et al, 1994) and / or ref 2 (Bergey’s manual, 2008). Most other references cited below are linked to taxa described AFTER 1994 or 2008 and historically were NOT cited in Collins and/or the Bergey’s chapter. References are only cited once; some references describe taxa which fell into multiple clusters. Literature cited (done April 19 2017) Cluster I references 1. Collins, MD, Lawson, PA, Willems, A, Cordoba, JJ, Fernandez-Garayzabal, J, Garcia, P, Cai, J, Hippe, H, Farrow, JA. 1994. The phylogeny of the genus Clostridium: proposal of five new genera and eleven new species combinations. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 44:812-826. 2. Rainey, FA, Hollen, BJ, Small, A. 2008. Genus I. Clostridium Prazmowski 1880, 23 AL in Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology 2nd ed., p. 738-828. In De Vos, P, Garrity, GM, Jones, D, Krieg, NR, Ludwig, W, Rainey, FA, Schleifer, K, Whitman, WB (eds.), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology 2nd ed., 2nd ed., vol. 3 The Firmicutes. Springer, Dordrecht Heidelberg London New York. 3. Orlygsson, J, Krooneman, J, Collins, MD, Pascual, C, Gottschalk, G. 1996. Clostridum acetireducens sp. nov., a novel amino acid-oxidizing, acetate-reducing anaerobic bacterium. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 46:454-459. 4. Kuhner, CH, Matthies, C, Acker, G, Schmittroth, M, Gossner, AS, Drake, HL. 2000. Clostridium akagii sp. nov. and Clostridium acidisoli sp. nov.: acid-tolerant, N2-fixing clostridia isolated from acidic forest soil and litter.
    [Show full text]
  • Schema Frontespizio Teso Dottorato
    Alma Mater Studiorum – Università di Bologna DOTTORATO DI RICERCA IN BIOLOGIA CELLULARE, MOLECOLARE E INDUSTRIALE Ciclo XXII PROGETTO 3: BIOCATALISI APPLICATA E MICROBIOLOGIA INDUSTRIALE Settore scientifico-disciplinare di afferenza: CHIM11 TITOLO DELLA TESI: MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION OF THE HUMAN GUT MICROBIOTA: THE EFFECT OF AGING Presentata da: Dott.ssa Elena Biagi Coordinatore del Dottorato: Relatore: Prof. A. Hockhoeppler Prof.ssa Patrizia Brigidi Esame finale anno 2010 Fact are stubborn things, but statistics are more pliable. Mark Twain, (1835-1919) First draw your curve, then plot your readings. A. Bloch, in “The Murphy’s Law” ABSTRACT Age-related physiological changes in the gastrointestinal tract, as well as modification in lifestyle, nutritional behaviour, and functionality of the host immune system, inevitably affect the gut microbiota. The study presented here is focused on the application and comparison of two different microarray approaches for the characterization of the human gut microbiota, the HITChip and the HTF-Microb.Array, with particular attention to the effects of the aging process on the composition of this ecosystem. By using the Human Intestinal Tract Chip (HITChip), recently developed at the Wageningen University, The Netherland, we explored the age-related changes of gut microbiota during the whole adult lifespan, from young adults, through elderly to centenarians. We observed that the microbial composition and diversity of the gut ecosystem of young adults and seventy-years old people is highly similar but differs significantly from that of the centenarians. After 100 years of symbiotic association with the human host, the microbiota is characterized by a rearrangement in the Firmicutes population and an enrichment of facultative anaerobes.
    [Show full text]
  • Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of the "Dangerous
    Center for International and Security Studies at Maryland1 Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of the “Dangerous Activities” Categories Jens H. Kuhn July 2005 CISSM School of Public Policy This paper was prepared as part of the Advanced Methods of Cooperative Security Program at the Center 4113 Van Munching Hall for International and Security Studies at Maryland, with generous support from the MacArthur Foundation University of Maryland and the Sloan Foundation. College Park, MD 20742 Tel: (301) 405-7601 [email protected] 2 QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE “DANGEROUS ACTIVITIES” CATEGORIES DEFINED BY THE CISSM CONTROLLING DANGEROUS PATHOGENS PROJECT WORKING PAPER (July 31, 2005) Jens H. Kuhn, MD, ScD (Med. Sci.), MS (Biochem.) Contact Address: New England Primate Research Center Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics Harvard Medical School 1 Pine Hill Drive Southborough, MA 01772-9102, USA Phone: (508) 786-3326 Fax: (508) 786-3317 Email: [email protected] 3 OBJECTIVE The Controlling Dangerous Pathogens Project of the Center for International Security Studies at Maryland (CISSM) outlines a prototype oversight system for ongoing microbiological research to control its possible misapplication. This so-called Biological Research Security System (BRSS) foresees the creation of regional, national, and international oversight bodies that review, approve, or reject those proposed microbiological research projects that would fit three BRSS-defined categories: Potentially Dangerous Activities (PDA), Moderately Dangerous Activities (MDA), and Extremely Dangerous Activities (EDA). It is the objective of this working paper to assess these categories qualitatively and quantitatively. To do so, published US research of the years 2000-present (early- to mid-2005) will be screened for science reports that would have fallen under the proposed oversight system had it existed already.
    [Show full text]
  • Bacterial Ecology of Abattoir Wastewater Treated by an Anaerobic Digestor
    b r a z i l i a n j o u r n a l o f m i c r o b i o l o g y 4 7 (2 0 1 6) 73–84 h ttp://www.bjmicrobiol.com.br/ Environmental Microbiology Bacterial ecology of abattoir wastewater treated by an anaerobic digestor a,b a,c a b Linda Jabari , Hana Gannoun , Eltaief Khelifi , Jean-Luc Cayol , d a b,∗ Jean-Jacques Godon , Moktar Hamdi , Marie-Laure Fardeau a Université de Carthage, Laboratoire d’Ecologie et de Technologie Microbienne, Institut National des Sciences Appliquées et de Technologie (INSAT), 2 Boulevard de la terre, B.P. 676, 1080 Tunis, Tunisia b Aix-Marseille Université, Université du Sud Toulon-Var, CNRS/INSU, IRD, MOI, UM 110, 13288 Marseille cedex 9, France c Université Tunis El Manar, Institut Supérieur des Sciences Biologiques Appliquées de Tunis (ISSBAT) 9, avenue Zouhaïer Essafi, 1006 Tunis, Tunisia d INRA U050, Laboratoire de Biotechnologie de l’Environnement, Avenue des Étangs, F-11100 Narbonne, France a r a t i c l e i n f o b s t r a c t Article history: Wastewater from an anaerobic treatment plant at a slaughterhouse was analysed to deter- Received 19 September 2014 mine the bacterial biodiversity present. Molecular analysis of the anaerobic sludge obtained Accepted 6 July 2015 from the treatment plant showed significant diversity, as 27 different phyla were identified. Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Thermotogae, Euryarchaeota (methanogens), and msbl6 Associate Editor: Welington Luiz de (candidate division) were the dominant phyla of the anaerobic treatment plant and repre- Araújo sented 21.7%, 18.5%, 11.5%, 9.4%, 8.9%, and 8.8% of the total bacteria identified, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • (ΐ2) United States Patent (ΐο) Patent No.: US 10,920,222 Β2 Sommer Et Al
    US010920222B2 (ΐ2) United States Patent (ΐο) Patent No.: US 10,920,222 Β2 Sommer et al. (45) Date ofPatent: Feb. 16, 2021 (54) TREATING AND PREVENTING MICROBIAL (56) References Cited INFECTIONS U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS (71) Applicant: SNIPR Biome ApS, Copenhagen 0 4,626,504 A 12/1986 Puhler (DK) 4,870,287 A 9/1989 Cole 5,633,154 A 5/1997 Schaefer 5,760,395 A 6/1998 Johnstone (72) Inventors: Morten Sommer, Copenhagen 0 (DK); 5,844,905 A 12/1998 Mckay Virginia Martinez, Copenhagen 0 5,885,796 A 3/1999 Linsley (DK); Eric Van Der Helm, 6,207,156 Β1 3/2001 Kuchroo Copenhagen 0 (DK); Jakob Krause 7,459,272 Β2 12/2008 Morris Haaber, Copenhagen 0 (DK); Ana De 8,003,323 Β2 8/2011 Morris 8,008,449 Β2 8/2011 Korman Santiago Torio, Copenhagen 0 (DK); 8,017,114 Β2 9/2011 Korman Christian Grondahl, Copenhagen 0 8,119,129 Β2 2/2012 Jure-kunkel (DK); Jasper Clube, London (GB) 8,241,498 Β2 8/2012 Summer 8,252,576 Β2 8/2012 Campbell 8,329,867 Β2 12/2012 Lazar (73) Assignee: SNIPR Biome ApS, Copenhagen 0 8,354,509 Β2 1/2013 Carven (DK) 8,735,553 Β1 5/2014 Li 8,906,682 Β2 12/2014 June 8,911,993 Β2 12/2014 June ( * ) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 8,916,381 Β1 12/2014 June patent is extended or adjusted under 35 8,975,071 Β1 3/2015 June U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days.
    [Show full text]
  • 6S Bacterial Rrna Microbiome Analyses of the Lung Identifies a Unique Bacterial Species Associated with a Specific T-53 Mutation
    Species-specific 16S Bacterial rRNA Microbiome Analyses of the Lung Identifies a Unique Bacterial Species Associated with a Specific T-53 Mutation Garth D. Ehrlich, Ph.D., F.A.A.A.S Executive Director, Center for Genomic Sciences Executive Director, Center for Advanced Microbial Processing Professor of Microbiology and Immunology Drexel University College of Medicine Director, Meta-Omics Shared Resource Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center PacBio Users Group Meeting, St. Louis, MO, September 19, 2018. Thanks and acknowledgements The Lab Team The Bioinformatic Team Jarek Krol, PhD Azad Ahmed, MD Josh Earl, ABD Josh Mell, PhD Steven Lang, BS Bhaswati Sen, PhD Carol Hope, BS Archana Bhat, MS Rachael Ehrlich, MS Objectives of Pan-Domain Technology • Broad-based identification of Bacteria and Fungi – no a priori guessing of what to test for within these domains – No culture necessary • Mixed populations of microbes (polymicrobial assemblages) • Quantitative • High resolution genotyping • Identify emerging agents not previously seen • Costs effective, high throughput 16S Microbiome Analyses • Revolutionized community-based microbial studies – Revealed unprecedented levels of complexity • Natural systems - soils water • Organismal systems – Holobiont – Metazoans and their microbiota – Plants and their microbiota The Problem with NextGen Microbiome analyses Lack of specificity – good for global analyses of diversity • Short read-lengths – – Genus-level taxonomic characterization at best – Sometime only family level • High error rates – Single-pass sequencing
    [Show full text]