(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2017/0137885 A1 Salomon Et Al

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2017/0137885 A1 Salomon Et Al US 2017013 7885A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2017/0137885 A1 Salomon et al. (43) Pub. Date: May 18, 2017 (54) GENE EXPRESSION PROFILES Sep. 9, 2014, which is a continuation-in-part of appli ASSOCATED WITH SUB-CLINICAL cation No. PCT/US2014/054735, filed on May 22, KIDNEY TRANSPLANT RELECTION 2014. (60) Provisional application No. 62/001.902, filed on May (71) Applicants: THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH 22, 2014, provisional application No. 62/001,909, INSTITUTE, LA JOLLA, CA (US); filed on May 22, 2014, provisional application No. NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY, 62/001.889, filed on May 22, 2014, provisional ap EVANSTON, IL (US) plication No. 62/029,038, filed on Jul. 25, 2014. (72) Inventors: Daniel R. Salomon, San Diego, CA (US); John Friedewald, Chicago, IL Publication Classification (US); Sunil Kurian, San Diego, CA (51) Int. C. (US); Michael M. Abecassis, Highland CI2O I/68 (2006.01) Park, IL (US); Steven Head, Lakeside, (52) U.S. C. CA (US); Phillip Ordoukhanian, San CPC ..... CI2O 1/6883 (2013.01); C12O 2600/158 Diego, CA (US) (2013.01); C12O 2600/118 (2013.01) (21) Appl. No.: 15/358,390 (57) ABSTRACT (22) Filed: Nov. 22, 2016 By a genome-wide gene analysis of expression profiles of over 50,000 known or putative gene sequences in peripheral Related U.S. Application Data blood, the present inventors have identified a consensus set (63) Continuation of application No. PCT/US2015/ of gene expression-based molecular biomarkers associated 032202, filed on May 22, 2015, which is a continu with subclinical acute rejection (subAR). These genes sets ation-in-part of application No. 14/481,167, filed on are useful for diagnosis, prognosis, monitoring of SubAR. Patent Application Publication May 18, 2017. Sheet 1 of 7 US 2017/O137885 A1 A schematic Overview of certain methods in the disclosure, 10. Obtain sample from a transplant recipient 120. Perform assay to determine gene expression level 130. Apply computer algorithm to the gene expression level 4. Classification Class A Class E Class C based on the results Patent Application Publication May 18, 2017. Sheet 2 of 7 US 2017/O137885 A1 A system for implementing the methods of the disclosure. 2. Transplant 22. 23, recipient Sample Assay 240. \ S 25,internet 29O. Other use -1 Patent Application Publication May 18, 2017. Sheet 3 of 7 US 2017/O137885 A1 WHSC 3 ZNF883 s US 37 C303 SC23A g 44242 g ARS3 S. 2 ZNF,75 ASRS S. ARHAP4 3 33 B 5 SKAP2 - 3 RAGEF5 8 . ERE C 5. r sxs : CR X e & 0.348 PLNS 3.: 10.7%f2 k s Cl4cras s SATA s TMEM22 Corf.32 R 3. A4 2 RLBP is SP3 f. Patent Application Publication May 18, 2017. Sheet 4 of 7 US 2017/O137885 A1 A system for implementing the methods of the disclosure. 435 45 4. Patent Application Publication May 18, 2017. Sheet 5 of 7 US 2017/O137885 A1 Correlation of fold-change between microarray and NGS analyses (68 common genes). Fold-Change, AR 8x vs. SCAR BX: wo -4 • Fold-Change ARBX vs. SCAR 8x: -8 -tier Fochange:ARBX s.33ARBX}} Fold-ChargetAR vs. TX8x} 2. * 2 R-r:- .888.8885 -4 • Fold-Change ARVs, TXBX: - - Linear Fel-Chenge:AR vs. TXBX. Fold-Change:SCAR vs. TXBX} 8 R* : 0.988 0 Fok-Change: Patent Application Publication May 18, 2017. Sheet 6 of 7 US 2017/O137885 A1 t & S & s & & - 3. Patent Application Publication May 18, 2017. Sheet 7 of 7 US 2017/O137885 A1 Correlation of fold-change between microarray and NGS analyses (ali expressed NGS 7.378 genes). Fold-Change{AR vs.TX. 8 R2 = 9.8053 6---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (s • Fold-Change:ARys. X -4 Fold-Change(AR 8x vs.SCAR Bx R2 = 9.4855 8 8 wk • Fok-Charge AR 9x vs. 80AREx Fold-ChangeSCAR 8x vs.TX 3x) 6 4. 0 Fok-Change:SCARBX vs. TXBx US 2017/O 137885 A1 May 18, 2017 GENE EXPRESSION PROFILES (such as increased perforin, granzyme, c-Bet expression or ASSOCATED WITH SUB-CLINICAL macrophage markers), or by an increased ability of the KIDNEY TRANSPLANT REUECTION allograft to withstand immune injury (accommodation). SubAR or SCAR is often diagnosed only on biopsies taken CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED as per protocol at a fixed time after transplantation, rather APPLICATIONS than driven by clinical indication. Its diagnosis cannot rely 0001. This application claims the benefit of priority to on traditional kidney function measurements like serum International Application No. PCT/US2015/032202, filed creatinine and glomerular filtration rates. Predicting graft May 22, 2015; to U.S. application Ser. No. 14/481,167, filed outcomes strictly based on the kidney biopsy is difficult and Sep. 9, 2014; to International Application No. PCT/US2014/ this invasive procedure has significant costs and risks for 054735, filed Sep. 9, 2014; to U.S. Provisional Application patients. Organ biopsy results can also be inaccurate, par No. 62/029,038, filed Jul. 25, 2014; to U.S. Provisional ticularly if the area biopsied is not representative of the Application No. 62/001,889, filed May 22, 2014; to U.S. health of the organ as a whole (e.g., as a result of sampling error). There can be significant differences between indi Provisional Application No. 62/001,902, filed May 22, vidual observers when they read the same biopsies indepen 2014; and to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/001,909, dently and these discrepancies are particularly an issue for filed May 22, 2014, each of which is incorporated by complex histologies that can be challenging for clinicians. In reference herein in their entirety. addition, the early detection of rejection of a transplant STATEMENT CONCERNING GOVERNMENT organ may require serial monitoring by obtaining multiple SUPPORT biopsies, thereby multiplying the risks to the patients, as well as the associated costs. 0002 This invention was made with government support 0008 Transplant rejection is a marker of ineffective under AIO63603 awarded by the National Institutes of immunosuppression and ultimately if it cannot be resolved, Health. government has certain rights in the invention. a failure of the chosen therapy. The fact that 50% of kidney transplant patients will lose their grafts by ten years post COPYRIGHT NOTIFICATION transplant reveals the difficulty of maintaining adequate and 0003 Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. S1.71(e), Applicants note effective long-term immunosuppression. Currently, there are that a portion of this disclosure contains material which is no other effective and reliable blood-based or any other tests Subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no for subAR or SCAR diagnosis. Thus, there is a pressing objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the medical need to identify minimally invasive biomarkers that patent document or patent disclosure, as it appears in the are able to identify SubAR or SCAR at a time that changes Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but in therapy may alter outcomes. The present invention otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever. addresses this and other unfulfilled needs in the art. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 0004 Kidney transplantation offers a significant 0009. In one aspect, the disclosure provides methods of improvement in life expectancy and quality of life for detecting, prognosing, diagnosing or monitoring Subclinical patients with end stage renal disease. Unfortunately, graft acute rejection (subAR or SCAR). These methods typically losses due to allograft dysfunction or other uncertain etiolo entail obtaining nucleic acids of interest, and then (a) gies have greatly hampered the therapeutic potential of determining or detecting expression levels in a Subject of at kidney transplantation. Among various types of graft losses, least 5 genes (e.g., at least 10 genes, at least 20 genes, at least Subclinical acute 50 genes, at least 100 genes, at least 300 genes, at least 500 0005 rejection (subAR or SCAR) is histologically genes, etc.); and (b) detecting, prognosing, diagnosing or defined as acute rejection characterized by tubule-interstitial monitoring subAR or SCAR in the subject from the expres mononuclear infiltration identified from a biopsy specimen, sion levels. In some methods, the nucleic acids of interest but without concurrent functional deterioration (variably comprise mRNA extracted from a sample from the subject defined as a serum creatinine not exceeding 10%, 20% or or nucleic acids derived from the mRNA extracted from the 25% of baseline values). sample from the subject. The methods are particularly useful 0006. A critically important challenge for the future of for analysis of blood samples. molecular diagnostics in transplantation based on peripheral 0010 Some of the methods are directed to subjects who blood profiling is to predict a state of adequate immunosup have or are at risk of developing SubAR or SCAR or acute pression with immune mediated kidney injury before there rejection (AR), or have well-functioning normal transplant is a change in the serum creatinine. This is the challenge of (TX). In some of the methods, the subject has a serum identifying Subclinical acute rejection, which at this time is creatinine level of less than 3 mg/dL, less than 2.5 mg/dL, only occasionally and accidentally picked up by protocol less than 2.0 mg/dL, or less than 1.5 mg/dL. In some biopsies done at arbitrary time points. methods, the Subject has a normal serum creatinine level. In 0007. The terms subAR and SCAR are used interchange Some of the methods, for each of the at least five genes, step ably herein to refer to subclinical acute rejection. SubAR (or (b) involves comparing the expression level of the gene in SCAR) is distinct from clinical acute rejection, which is the subject to one or more reference expression levels of the characterized by acute functional renal impairment.
Recommended publications
  • Screening and Identification of Key Biomarkers in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Based on Bioinformatics Analysis
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.21.423889; this version posted December 23, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Screening and identification of key biomarkers in clear cell renal cell carcinoma based on bioinformatics analysis Basavaraj Vastrad1, Chanabasayya Vastrad*2 , Iranna Kotturshetti 1. Department of Biochemistry, Basaveshwar College of Pharmacy, Gadag, Karnataka 582103, India. 2. Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Chanabasava Nilaya, Bharthinagar, Dharwad 580001, Karanataka, India. 3. Department of Ayurveda, Rajiv Gandhi Education Society`s Ayurvedic Medical College, Ron, Karnataka 562209, India. * Chanabasayya Vastrad [email protected] Ph: +919480073398 Chanabasava Nilaya, Bharthinagar, Dharwad 580001 , Karanataka, India bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.21.423889; this version posted December 23, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Abstract Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is one of the most common types of malignancy of the urinary system. The pathogenesis and effective diagnosis of ccRCC have become popular topics for research in the previous decade. In the current study, an integrated bioinformatics analysis was performed to identify core genes associated in ccRCC. An expression dataset (GSE105261) was downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database, and included 26 ccRCC and 9 normal kideny samples. Assessment of the microarray dataset led to the recognition of differentially expressed genes (DEGs), which was subsequently used for pathway and gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 2. Functional Classification of Genes Differentially Regulated After HOXB4 Inactivation in HSC/Hpcs
    Table 2. Functional classification of genes differentially regulated after HOXB4 inactivation in HSC/HPCs Symbol Gene description Fold-change (mean ± SD) Signal transduction Adam8 A disintegrin and metalloprotease domain 8 1.91 ± 0.51 Arl4 ADP-ribosylation factor-like 4 - 1.80 ± 0.40 Dusp6 Dual specificity phosphatase 6 (Mkp3) - 2.30 ± 0.46 Ksr1 Kinase suppressor of ras 1 1.92 ± 0.42 Lyst Lysosomal trafficking regulator 1.89 ± 0.34 Mapk1ip1 Mitogen activated protein kinase 1 interacting protein 1 1.84 ± 0.22 Narf* Nuclear prelamin A recognition factor 2.12 ± 0.04 Plekha2 Pleckstrin homology domain-containing. family A. (phosphoinosite 2.15 ± 0.22 binding specific) member 2 Ptp4a2 Protein tyrosine phosphatase 4a2 - 2.04 ± 0.94 Rasa2* RAS p21 activator protein 2 - 2.80 ± 0.13 Rassf4 RAS association (RalGDS/AF-6) domain family 4 3.44 ± 2.56 Rgs18 Regulator of G-protein signaling - 1.93 ± 0.57 Rrad Ras-related associated with diabetes 1.81 ± 0.73 Sh3kbp1 SH3 domain kinase bindings protein 1 - 2.19 ± 0.53 Senp2 SUMO/sentrin specific protease 2 - 1.97 ± 0.49 Socs2 Suppressor of cytokine signaling 2 - 2.82 ± 0.85 Socs5 Suppressor of cytokine signaling 5 2.13 ± 0.08 Socs6 Suppressor of cytokine signaling 6 - 2.18 ± 0.38 Spry1 Sprouty 1 - 2.69 ± 0.19 Sos1 Son of sevenless homolog 1 (Drosophila) 2.16 ± 0.71 Ywhag 3-monooxygenase/tryptophan 5- monooxygenase activation protein. - 2.37 ± 1.42 gamma polypeptide Zfyve21 Zinc finger. FYVE domain containing 21 1.93 ± 0.57 Ligands and receptors Bambi BMP and activin membrane-bound inhibitor - 2.94 ± 0.62
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Distinct Regulator of G-Protein Signaling 10 Isoforms On
    EFFECT OF DISTINCT REGULATOR OF G-PROTEIN SIGNALING 10 ISOFORMS ON CYTOKINE PRODUCTION. by BENJAMIN JACKWOOD (Under the Direction of Shelley Hooks) ABSTRACT G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) mediate a wide variety of cellular functions related to cell proliferation and survival. Regulators of G-protein Signaling (RGS) proteins that are important negative regulators of both G-proteins and GPCR products. The focus of this thesis involves two human protein variants of RGS10 and their effects on cytokine levels. RGS proteins are GTPase Accelerating Proteins (GAPs) which can facilitate an increased rate of GTP hydrolysis to drive inactivation of GPCR signaling. Based on their ability to regulate GPCRs, RGS proteins are implicated in multiple disease states including cancer and neuro-inflammation. The aim of this study was to define the similarities or differences among RGS10 protein isoforms, and help understand their non-canonical function. Particularly, differences in primary sequence of RGS10 protein variants and their ability to mediate inflammatory cytokines in human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells was investigated. INDEX WORDS: GPCR, RGS10, ISOFORM, TNF-, INFLAMMATION, VARIANTS EFFECT OF DISTINCT REGULATOR OF G-PROTEIN SIGNALING 10 ISOFORMS ON CYTOKINE PRODUCTION. by BENJAMIN JACKWOOD BS, University of North Georgia, 2015 A Thesis Submitted to the Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sciences department of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree. MASTER OF SCIENCE ATHENS, GEORGIA 2017 © 2017 Benjamin Jackwood All Rights Reserved EFFECT OF DISTINCT REGULATOR OF G-PROTEIN RGS10 ISOFORMS ON CYTOKINE PRODUCTION. by BENJAMIN JACKWOOD Major Professor: Shelley B. Hooks Committee: Phillip Greenspan Jason Zastre Electronic Version Approved: Suzanne Barbour Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia May 2017 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thanks to my family, friends, and helpful lab mates for all of their support during my time working and studying at the University of Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • Gene Expression-Based Recurrence Prediction of Hepatitis B Virus-Related Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    GSK 후원 해외연수지원 기금 연구보고 Gene expression-based recurrence prediction of hepatitis B virus-related human hepatocellular carcinoma Yoon Jun Kim, M.D. Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea ABSTRACT Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of poor prognostic malignancies because of the high rate of recurrence even after curative resection of tumors. To predict and classify the molecular signatures associated with early recurrence, we profiled the gene expression of 65 HCC samples with hepatitis B infection using genome-scale oligonucleotide microarray. We identified 348 unique gene set well reflecting early recurrence (ER) of HCC, which revealed to be enriched by GTPase signaling related genes, transcription, immune response, cell adhesion and motility related genes. We also generated a signature responding to recurrence time by using Cox proportional hazard model (HR genes). Hierarchical clustering showed that HR genes are more accurate classifier than ER genes. In addition, we applied a meta-analysis to integrate earlier expression data (Iizuka et al, 2003), and obtained 232 genes consistently expressed in both the independent data. This signature was validated in an independent study indicating its robustness for the prediction of HCC recurrence. In conclusion, the gene signatures retrieved from different but complementary methods may provide clues to predict patients with increased risk of developing early recurrence, and to identify novel therapeutic targets for HCC. Key Words: Hepatitis B Virus; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Recurrence; Microarray; Gene Expression Profile Corresponding Author: Yoon Jun Kim, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 28 Yongon-dong, Chongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, Korea.
    [Show full text]
  • Bayesian Hierarchical Modeling of High-Throughput Genomic Data with Applications to Cancer Bioinformatics and Stem Cell Differentiation
    BAYESIAN HIERARCHICAL MODELING OF HIGH-THROUGHPUT GENOMIC DATA WITH APPLICATIONS TO CANCER BIOINFORMATICS AND STEM CELL DIFFERENTIATION by Keegan D. Korthauer A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Statistics) at the UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN–MADISON 2015 Date of final oral examination: 05/04/15 The dissertation is approved by the following members of the Final Oral Committee: Christina Kendziorski, Professor, Biostatistics and Medical Informatics Michael A. Newton, Professor, Statistics Sunduz Kele¸s,Professor, Biostatistics and Medical Informatics Sijian Wang, Associate Professor, Biostatistics and Medical Informatics Michael N. Gould, Professor, Oncology © Copyright by Keegan D. Korthauer 2015 All Rights Reserved i in memory of my grandparents Ma and Pa FL Grandma and John ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, I am deeply grateful to my thesis advisor Christina Kendziorski for her invaluable advice, enthusiastic support, and unending patience throughout my time at UW-Madison. She has provided sound wisdom on everything from methodological principles to the intricacies of academic research. I especially appreciate that she has always encouraged me to eke out my own path and I attribute a great deal of credit to her for the successes I have achieved thus far. I also owe special thanks to my committee member Professor Michael Newton, who guided me through one of my first collaborative research experiences and has continued to provide key advice on my thesis research. I am also indebted to the other members of my thesis committee, Professor Sunduz Kele¸s,Professor Sijian Wang, and Professor Michael Gould, whose valuable comments, questions, and suggestions have greatly improved this dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportin 1 Accumulates Specifically with FET Proteins but No Other
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by RERO DOC Digital Library Acta Neuropathol DOI 10.1007/s00401-012-1020-6 ORIGINAL PAPER Transportin 1 accumulates specifically with FET proteins but no other transportin cargos in FTLD-FUS and is absent in FUS inclusions in ALS with FUS mutations Manuela Neumann • Chiara F. Valori • Olaf Ansorge • Hans A. Kretzschmar • David G. Munoz • Hirofumi Kusaka • Osamu Yokota • Kenji Ishihara • Lee-Cyn Ang • Juan M. Bilbao • Ian R. A. Mackenzie Received: 22 May 2012 / Accepted: 16 July 2012 Ó Springer-Verlag 2012 Abstract Accumulation of the DNA/RNA binding pro- in these conditions. While ALS-FUS showed only accu- tein fused in sarcoma (FUS) as inclusions in neurons and mulation of FUS, inclusions in FTLD-FUS revealed co- glia is the pathological hallmark of amyotrophic lateral accumulation of all members of the FET protein family, that sclerosis patients with mutations in FUS (ALS-FUS) as well include FUS, Ewing’s sarcoma (EWS) and TATA-binding as in several subtypes of frontotemporal lobar degeneration protein-associated factor 15 (TAF15) suggesting a more (FTLD-FUS), which are not associated with FUS muta- complex disturbance of transportin-mediated nuclear tions. Despite some overlap in the phenotype and import of proteins in FTLD-FUS compared to ALS-FUS. neuropathology of FTLD-FUS and ALS-FUS, significant To gain more insight into the mechanisms of inclusion body differences of potential pathomechanistic relevance were formation, we investigated the role of Transportin 1 (Trn1) recently identified in the protein composition of inclusions as well as 13 additional cargo proteins of Transportin in the spectrum of FUS-opathies by immunohistochemistry and biochemically.
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
    [Show full text]
  • FUS-NLS/Transportin 1 Complex Structure Provides
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry Faculty Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry Publications 10-8-2012 FUS-NLS/Transportin 1 complex structure provides insights into the nuclear targeting mechanism of FUS and the implications in ALS Chunyan Niu Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Jiayu Zhang University of Kentucky, [email protected] Feng Gao Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Liuqing Yang University of Kentucky, [email protected] Minze Jia Chinese Academy of Sciences, China See next page for additional authors Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits oy u. Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/biochem_facpub Part of the Biochemistry, Biophysics, and Structural Biology Commons Repository Citation Niu, Chunyan; Zhang, Jiayu; Gao, Feng; Yang, Liuqing; Jia, Minze; Zhu, Haining; and Gong, Weimin, "FUS-NLS/Transportin 1 complex structure provides insights into the nuclear targeting mechanism of FUS and the implications in ALS" (2012). Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry Faculty Publications. 9. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/biochem_facpub/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Chunyan Niu, Jiayu Zhang, Feng Gao, Liuqing Yang, Minze Jia, Haining Zhu, and Weimin Gong FUS-NLS/Transportin 1 complex structure provides insights into the nuclear targeting mechanism of FUS and the implications in ALS Notes/Citation Information Published in PLoS ONE, v.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of BBX Proteins As Rate-Limiting Co-Factors of HY5
    1 Identification of BBX proteins as rate-limiting co-factors of HY5. 2 Katharina Bursch1, Gabriela Toledo-Ortiz2, Marie Pireyre3, Miriam Lohr1, Cordula Braatz1, Henrik 3 Johansson1* 4 1. Institute of Biology/Applied Genetics, Dahlem Centre of Plant Sciences (DCPS), Freie Universität 5 Berlin, Albrecht-Thaer-Weg 6. D-14195 Berlin, Germany. 6 2. Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, UK 7 3. Department of Botany and Plant Biology, Section of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of 8 Geneva, 30 Quai E. Ansermet, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland 9 *E-mail [email protected] 10 Abstract 11 As a source of both energy and environmental information, monitoring the incoming light is crucial for 12 plants to optimize growth throughout development1. Concordantly, the light signalling pathways in 13 plants are highly integrated with numerous other regulatory pathways2,3. One of these signal 14 integrators is the bZIP transcription factor HY5 which holds a key role as a positive regulator of light 15 signalling in plants4,5. Although HY5 is thought to act as a DNA-binding transcriptional regulator6,7, the 16 lack of any apparent transactivation domain8 makes it unclear how HY5 is able to accomplish its many 17 functions. Here, we describe the identification of three B-box containing proteins (BBX20, 21 and 22) 18 as essential partners for HY5 dependent modulation of hypocotyl elongation, anthocyanin 19 accumulation and transcriptional regulation. The bbx202122 triple mutant mimics the phenotypes of 20 hy5 in the light and its ability to suppress the cop1 mutant phenotype in darkness. Furthermore, 84% 21 of genes that exhibit differential expression in bbx202122 are also HY5 regulated, and we provide 22 evidence that HY5 requires the B-box proteins for transcriptional regulation.
    [Show full text]
  • 4-6 Weeks Old Female C57BL/6 Mice Obtained from Jackson Labs Were Used for Cell Isolation
    Methods Mice: 4-6 weeks old female C57BL/6 mice obtained from Jackson labs were used for cell isolation. Female Foxp3-IRES-GFP reporter mice (1), backcrossed to B6/C57 background for 10 generations, were used for the isolation of naïve CD4 and naïve CD8 cells for the RNAseq experiments. The mice were housed in pathogen-free animal facility in the La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology and were used according to protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and use Committee. Preparation of cells: Subsets of thymocytes were isolated by cell sorting as previously described (2), after cell surface staining using CD4 (GK1.5), CD8 (53-6.7), CD3ε (145- 2C11), CD24 (M1/69) (all from Biolegend). DP cells: CD4+CD8 int/hi; CD4 SP cells: CD4CD3 hi, CD24 int/lo; CD8 SP cells: CD8 int/hi CD4 CD3 hi, CD24 int/lo (Fig S2). Peripheral subsets were isolated after pooling spleen and lymph nodes. T cells were enriched by negative isolation using Dynabeads (Dynabeads untouched mouse T cells, 11413D, Invitrogen). After surface staining for CD4 (GK1.5), CD8 (53-6.7), CD62L (MEL-14), CD25 (PC61) and CD44 (IM7), naïve CD4+CD62L hiCD25-CD44lo and naïve CD8+CD62L hiCD25-CD44lo were obtained by sorting (BD FACS Aria). Additionally, for the RNAseq experiments, CD4 and CD8 naïve cells were isolated by sorting T cells from the Foxp3- IRES-GFP mice: CD4+CD62LhiCD25–CD44lo GFP(FOXP3)– and CD8+CD62LhiCD25– CD44lo GFP(FOXP3)– (antibodies were from Biolegend). In some cases, naïve CD4 cells were cultured in vitro under Th1 or Th2 polarizing conditions (3, 4).
    [Show full text]
  • Transcriptional Control of Tissue-Resident Memory T Cell Generation
    Transcriptional control of tissue-resident memory T cell generation Filip Cvetkovski Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2019 © 2019 Filip Cvetkovski All rights reserved ABSTRACT Transcriptional control of tissue-resident memory T cell generation Filip Cvetkovski Tissue-resident memory T cells (TRM) are a non-circulating subset of memory that are maintained at sites of pathogen entry and mediate optimal protection against reinfection. Lung TRM can be generated in response to respiratory infection or vaccination, however, the molecular pathways involved in CD4+TRM establishment have not been defined. Here, we performed transcriptional profiling of influenza-specific lung CD4+TRM following influenza infection to identify pathways implicated in CD4+TRM generation and homeostasis. Lung CD4+TRM displayed a unique transcriptional profile distinct from spleen memory, including up-regulation of a gene network induced by the transcription factor IRF4, a known regulator of effector T cell differentiation. In addition, the gene expression profile of lung CD4+TRM was enriched in gene sets previously described in tissue-resident regulatory T cells. Up-regulation of immunomodulatory molecules such as CTLA-4, PD-1, and ICOS, suggested a potential regulatory role for CD4+TRM in tissues. Using loss-of-function genetic experiments in mice, we demonstrate that IRF4 is required for the generation of lung-localized pathogen-specific effector CD4+T cells during acute influenza infection. Influenza-specific IRF4−/− T cells failed to fully express CD44, and maintained high levels of CD62L compared to wild type, suggesting a defect in complete differentiation into lung-tropic effector T cells.
    [Show full text]
  • Epigenetics Page 1
    Epigenetics esiRNA ID Gene Name Gene Description Ensembl ID HU-13237-1 ACTL6A actin-like 6A ENSG00000136518 HU-13925-1 ACTL6B actin-like 6B ENSG00000077080 HU-14457-1 ACTR1A ARP1 actin-related protein 1 homolog A, centractin alpha (yeast) ENSG00000138107 HU-10579-1 ACTR2 ARP2 actin-related protein 2 homolog (yeast) ENSG00000138071 HU-10837-1 ACTR3 ARP3 actin-related protein 3 homolog (yeast) ENSG00000115091 HU-09776-1 ACTR5 ARP5 actin-related protein 5 homolog (yeast) ENSG00000101442 HU-00773-1 ACTR6 ARP6 actin-related protein 6 homolog (yeast) ENSG00000075089 HU-07176-1 ACTR8 ARP8 actin-related protein 8 homolog (yeast) ENSG00000113812 HU-09411-1 AHCTF1 AT hook containing transcription factor 1 ENSG00000153207 HU-15150-1 AIRE autoimmune regulator ENSG00000160224 HU-12332-1 AKAP1 A kinase (PRKA) anchor protein 1 ENSG00000121057 HU-04065-1 ALG13 asparagine-linked glycosylation 13 homolog (S. cerevisiae) ENSG00000101901 HU-13552-1 ALKBH1 alkB, alkylation repair homolog 1 (E. coli) ENSG00000100601 HU-06662-1 ARID1A AT rich interactive domain 1A (SWI-like) ENSG00000117713 HU-12790-1 ARID1B AT rich interactive domain 1B (SWI1-like) ENSG00000049618 HU-09415-1 ARID2 AT rich interactive domain 2 (ARID, RFX-like) ENSG00000189079 HU-03890-1 ARID3A AT rich interactive domain 3A (BRIGHT-like) ENSG00000116017 HU-14677-1 ARID3B AT rich interactive domain 3B (BRIGHT-like) ENSG00000179361 HU-14203-1 ARID3C AT rich interactive domain 3C (BRIGHT-like) ENSG00000205143 HU-09104-1 ARID4A AT rich interactive domain 4A (RBP1-like) ENSG00000032219 HU-12512-1 ARID4B AT rich interactive domain 4B (RBP1-like) ENSG00000054267 HU-12520-1 ARID5A AT rich interactive domain 5A (MRF1-like) ENSG00000196843 HU-06595-1 ARID5B AT rich interactive domain 5B (MRF1-like) ENSG00000150347 HU-00556-1 ASF1A ASF1 anti-silencing function 1 homolog A (S.
    [Show full text]