National Banks Active As of 7/31/2021
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
International Comparison of Bank Fraud
Journal of Cybersecurity, 3(2), 2017, 109–125 doi: 10.1093/cybsec/tyx011 Research paper Research paper International comparison of bank fraud reimbursement: customer perceptions and contractual terms Ingolf Becker,1,* Alice Hutchings,2 Ruba Abu-Salma,1 Ross Anderson,2 Nicholas Bohm,3 Steven J. Murdoch,1 M. Angela Sasse,1 and Gianluca Stringhini1 1Computer Science Department, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT; 2 University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory, 15 JJ Thomson Avenue, CB3 0FD; 3Foundation for Information Policy Research *Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected] Received 7 May 2017; accepted 17 November 2017 Abstract The study presented in this article investigated to what extent bank customers understand the terms and conditions (T&Cs) they have signed up to. If many customers are not able to understand T&Cs and the behaviours they are expected to comply with, they risk not being compensated when their accounts are breached. An expert analysis of 30 bank contracts across 25 countries found that most contract terms were too vague for customers to infer required behaviour. In some cases the rules vary for different products, meaning the advice can be contradictory at worst. While many banks allow customers to write Personal identification numbers (PINs) down (as long as they are disguised and not kept with the card), 20% of banks categorically forbid writing PINs down, and a handful stipulate that the customer have a unique PIN for each account. We tested our findings in a survey with 151 participants in Germany, the USA and UK. They mostly agree: only 35% fully understand the T&Cs, and 28% find important sections are unclear. -
United States Bankruptcy Court District of Delaware
Case 20-11779-LSS Doc 55 Filed 07/09/20 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ------------------------------------------------------------ x In re : Chapter 11 : VIVUS, INC., et al., : Case No. 20–11779 (LSS) : : Debtors.1 : (Joint Administration Requested) ------------------------------------------------------------ x NOTICE OF FILING OF PROPOSED REDACTED VERSION OF THE CREDITOR MATRIX PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Rule 9018-1(d)(ii) of the Local Rules of Bankruptcy Practice and Procedure of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, VIVUS, Inc. and its debtor affiliates, as debtors and debtors in possession in the above-captioned chapter 11 cases, hereby file the attached proposed redacted version of the Creditor Matrix2 with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, 824 North Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801. 1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases, along with the last four digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable are: Vivus B.V. (1942); Vivus Digital Health Corporation (0625); VIVUS, Inc. (6179); and Vivus Pharmaceuticals Limited (9329). The Debtors’ corporate headquarters and service address is 900 E. Hamilton Avenue, Suite 550, Campbell, CA 95008. 2 Contemporaneously herewith, the Debtors have filed the Motion of Debtors for Entry of Order (I) Authorizing Debtors to Redact Certain Personal Identification Information in Creditor Matrix and Certain Other Documents and (II) Granting Related Relief. RLF1 23325296v.1 Case 20-11779-LSS Doc 55 Filed 07/09/20 Page 2 of 19 Dated: July 9, 2020 Wilmington, Delaware /s/ Sarah E. Silveira RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, P.A. Mark D. -
Annual Financial Report Contains Translations of Certain Australian Dollar Amounts Into US Dollars at Specified Rates
NAB Full financials 11/11/01 5:06 PM Page 1 Table of contents Financial performance 2 Financial report 60 Description of business 3 Statement of financial performance 62 Introduction 3 Statement of financial position 63 Vision and strategy 3 Statement of cash flows 64 Business operating model 3 Notes to the financial statements 65 Business and Personal Financial Services 3 Directors’ declaration 165 Specialist and Emerging Businesses 5 Auditors’ report 166 National Shared Services 5 Shareholder information 167 Wholesale Financial Services 5 Forward-looking statements 183 Wealth Management 6 Form 20-F cross reference index 184 HomeSide 6 Principal establishments 185 Corporate Centre 7 Sale of Michigan National Corporation 7 Competition 7 Regulation of the financial services system 7 Privacy 8 Organisational structure 8 Description of property 8 Certain legal proceedings 8 Financial review Overview 9 Selected financial data 12 Net interest income 15 Other banking and financial services income 18 Mortgage servicing and origination revenue 19 Life insurance business 19 Personnel expenses 21 Occupancy expenses 21 General expenses 21 Significant operating expenses 21 Charge to provide for doubtful debts 22 Significant non-operating items 23 Net profit by segment 24 Assets and equity 30 Return on average equity 30 Shareholder value 31 Earnings and dividends per share 32 Liquidity and capital resources 32 Capital adequacy 33 Changes in financial condition 35 Total assets under management and administration 35 Gross loans and advances 36 Impaired assets, provisions and allowance for loan losses 37 Deposits and other borrowings 40 Risk management 41 People and Culture 45 European Economic and Monetary Union 46 Risk factors 46 Goods and services tax 47 Accounting developments 47 Corporate governance statement 48 Report of the directors 52 1 NAB Full financials 11/11/01 5:06 PM Page 2 Financial performance Profitability $b Profit and significant items 5 Profit before significant items • Net profit after significant items decreased 35.7 per cent to $2,083 4 million. -
Failed Financial Institution Litigation: Remember When*
\\server05\productn\N\NYB\5-1\NYB101.txt unknown Seq: 1 27-APR-09 15:14 FAILED FINANCIAL INSTITUTION LITIGATION: REMEMBER WHEN* RICHARD D. BERNSTEIN JOHN R. OLLER JESSICA L. MATELIS** INTRODUCTION As the global economic crisis continues, the effect of the credit crisis and fair value accounting will create a likely up- surge in litigation, reminiscent of the wave of lawsuits spawned by the Savings and Loan crisis of 1988-1994 (“S&L crisis”). The body of law developed during the S&L crisis provides a ready starting point for this new round of failed financial institution litigation. Moreover, new developments since the S&L crisis will also be tested in the coming years. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and the Resolution Trust Corporation (“RTC”), in their capac- ity as receivers,1 and the Office of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”), in its regulatory capacity, spearheaded much of the S&L litiga- tion. The FDIC, RTC, and OTS aggressively pursued officers and directors of failed banks and thrifts, as well as various third parties, including audit firms, law firms, and a then-major in- vestment bank, that provided services to the failed institutions. At the height of the S&L crisis, the combined direct and indi- rect payments by the FDIC and the RTC to outside counsel in 1991 reached over $700 million. The collapse of Washington Mutual in September 2008 represented the largest bank failure in U.S. history;2 added to IndyMac’s collapse in July 2008 and the failure of a number of * “We lived and learned, life threw curves/There was joy, there was hurt/Remember when.” Remember When, lyrics by Alan Jackson. -
Dartmouth Law Journal Vol. 12.2 Fall 2014
BAEZ PROSECUTORIAL DISCRETION ADVISED: ANALYZING THE PROPER ROLE OF “ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES” AS A FACTOR IN FEDERAL PROSECUTORIAL DECISIONS NOT TO SEEK CRIMINAL CHARGES LUIS BAEZ** The 2008 housing and financial crisis produced numerous books, documentaries, and legal works around the term “Too Big to Jail.” Though the United States Justice Department claimed that the term’s applicability to the financial crisis was mostly conjecture, the past few years has indicated it is—for the most part—true. While other legal and scholarly works have discussed the term and its validity, this article argues that prosecutors should be entirely barred from considering “economic consequences” of their decisions whether or not to bring criminal charges against a person or other legal entity in order to uphold justice within the criminal system. ! INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 2 I. THE SOURCE OF FEDERAL PROSECUTORIAL DISCRETION ..................... 4 A. The Decision to Charge ................................................................ 5 B. Selecting the Charge ..................................................................... 5 II. RULES THAT GOVERN PROSECUTORIAL DISCRETION ............................ 6 III. THE HANDLING OF PAST CORPORATE CRIMES ...................................... 9 A. The Great Depression ................................................................... 9 B. Savings & Loan Crisis ................................................................. -
SC12-1500 Jurisdictional Answer Brief
CASE NO.: SC12-1500 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA EMPIRE WORLD TOWERS, LLC, ET AL., Petitioners, v. CDR CRÉANCES, S.A.S., Respondent. On Review from the Third District Court of Appeals CASE NO.: 3D11-159 RESPONDENT’S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF Scott B. Cosgrove KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP 1441 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1420 Miami, Florida 33131 Marcos Daniel Jiménez MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY 333 S.E. 2nd Avenue, Suite 4500 Miami, Florida 33131-4336 Lauri Waldman Ross ROSS & GIRTEN 9130 S. Dadeland Blvd., Suite 612 Miami, Florida 33156 Attorneys for Respondent TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................1 II. STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS ................................................. 1 III. SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT ............................................................... 6 IV. ARGUMENT ....................................................................................................6 A. The Legal Framework for Conflict Jurisdiction ............................................ 6 B. Empire World Towers Does Not Conflict with Dania Jai-Alai .................... 7 V. CONCLUSION ................................................................................................9 -i- TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) CASES Babe Elias Builders, Inc. v. Pernick, 765 So. 2d 119 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) ..................................................................... 9 Dania Jai-Alai Palace, Inc .v. Sikes, 450 So. 2d 1115 (Fla. 1984) ........................................................................passim -
Despite Large Deals, NJ Office Leasing Market Remains Cautious
MARKETVIEW New Jersey Office, Q3 2020 Despite Large Deals, NJ Office Leasing Market Remains Cautious Leasing Activity Net Absorption Availability Rate Average Asking Lease Rate 1.25M Sq. Ft. -649,000 Sq. Ft.. 20.8% $27.28 per Sq. Ft. MARKET OVERVIEW The availability rate rose by 50 basis points Even as COVID-19 has most occupiers taking a (bps) to 20.8%, the third consecutive cautious, wait-and-see approach to their occupancy quarterly increase. strategy, overall leasing activity in New Jersey was on the upswing in Q3 2020. Several major The average asking lease rate was stable transactions contributed to more than 1.25 million at $27.28. sq. ft. of leasing activity, a 256% increase from the second quarter but still well below the long-term Leasing activity increased 256%, from Q2 average. The third quarter saw encouraging news in 2020 to 1.25 Million Sq. Ft. three new commitments each of 100,000 sq. ft. or more, including two in Jersey City. The market also Net absorption was negative for the third benefited from a handful of large, long-term consecutive quarter, largely due to renewals. Occupiers who did pursue deals in Q3 sublease space flowing back to the market. were rewarded with generous landlord concessions, offered in order to get deals done at base rents close By the end of August, employment had to asking. increased to 3.82 million positions, or 90% Despite the quarterly improvement in leasing and a of February employment levels modest recovery of OUE in the third quarter, overall the New Jersey office market felt the impact of a still weakened economy, where OUE remains down 8.3% from pre-COVID levels. -
Annual Financial Report 2000
ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT 2000 ANNUAL Annual Financial Report 2000 Principal establishments National Australia Bank HomeSide Lending Singapore Branch National Australia Group Limited Australia 5 Temasek Boulevard Europe Limited Group Offices and 120 Spencer Street 15-01 Suntec Five Tower The Athenaeum Australian Financial Melbourne Vic 3000 Singapore 038985 8 Nelson Mandela Place Services (GPO Box 14547 Melbourne Glasgow G2 1BN 500 Bourke Street City MC Vic 8001) Tel: + 65 338 0038 Scotland (GPO Box 84A) Fax: + 65 338 0039 Melbourne Vic 3000 Tel: (in Aust.) 13 24 64 Tel: +44 141 223 5958 Australia Fax: +61 3 9601 7711 Tokyo Branch Fax: +44 141 223 5959 Mitsui Nigokan Tel: +61 3 8641 3500 O2-e Limited 2-1-1, Nihonbashi London Office Fax: +61 3 8641 4916 Level 1 Muromachi 6 – 8 Tokenhouse Yard www.national.com.au 553 St Kilda Road Chuo-ku London EC2R 7AJ Melbourne Vic 3004 Tokyo 103-0022 United Kingdom Australia Japan National Wealth Tel: +44 171 710 2100 Management Holdings Tel: +61 3 9909 8900 Tel: + 81 3 3241 8781 Fax: +44 171 588 8356 Limited Fax: +61 3 9909 8999 Fax: + 81 3 3241 5369 105 – 153 Miller Street www.o2-e.com North Sydney NSW 2060 National Australia Life Australia Bangkok Representative 91 Gresham Street Michigan National Office London EC2V 7NT Tel: +61 2 9957 8000 Corporation 16/F, Sathorn Thani United Kingdom Fax: +61 2 9957 6881 27777 Inkster Road Building 1 (PO Box 9065) 90 North Sathorn Road Tel: +44 171 710 2100 Fax: +44 171 726 4926 MLC Farmington Hills MI 48333- Bangkok 10500 MLC Building 9065 Thailand 105 – 153 Miller -
BANK MERGERS: IS BIGGER BETTER? Introduction
BANK MERGERS: IS BIGGER BETTER? Introduction In January 1998, the Bank of Montreal and the Royal Bank of Canada announced plans to merge and create one superbank. A few months later, in April, the Toronto Dominion Bank and the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce announced similar plans. The proposed bank mergers caught many people off guard, including Minister of Finance Paul Martin. In a Macleans interview, Martin said, "Just because they decided to get into bed together doesnt mean that I have to bless their union." Martins message seemed to be that Ottawa, not the banks, would decide the future of banking in Canada. "There will be no mergers in the banking sector until we are convinced that [it] is what is best for Canadians, and we will not be stampeded into making that decision." According to the banks, the proposed mergers were a natural response to a changing and highly competitive global marketplace. Mergers, they said, provide a way of maintaining a strong Canadian presence in the banking industry. Certainly, recent technological advances have dramatically changed the manner in which the financial services industry conduct their business, and the above- mentioned banks feel, therefore, that they need to be bigger to compete and to have a substantial presence in the global banking community. Martin himself acknowledged the changed nature of banking when he said, "If you look back at banking five years ago, you might as well look back two centuries." While the proposed bank mergers brought attention to the challenges facing Canadas banks, these challenges are not peculiar to the banks alone. -
Lobbying in Miami-Dade County
Miami-Dade County Board of County Commissioners Lobbying In Miami-Dade County 2013 Annual Report HARVEY RUVIN, Clerk of Circuit & County Courts and Ex-Officio Clerk to the Miami-Dade Board of County Commissioners Prepared by: Christopher Agrippa, Director Clerk of the Board Division Miami-Dade County Board of County Commissioners Lobbyist Registration SECTION I REGISTRATION BY LOBBYIST Printed on: 1/7/2014 Page 3 of 72 Miami-Dade County Board of County Commissioners Lobbyist Registration A ALFORD, JONATHAN 2440 RESEARCH BLVD ROCKVILLE MD 20850 ABOODY, JASON 9965 FEDERAL DRIVE OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICALS COLORADO SPRINGS CO 80921 THE SPECTRANETICS CORPORATION ALLY, DEANNA 700 10TH AVENUE SOUTH SUITE 20 MINNEAPOLIS MI 55415 ABRAMS, MICHAEL 801 BRICKELL AVENUE STE 900 ZYGA TECHNOLOGY, INC. MIAMI FL 33131 BALLARD PARTNERS ALSCHULER, JR, JOHN H 99 HUDSON ST 3 FLOOR NEW YORK NY 10013 ACOSTA, EDWARD 100 DENNIS DRIVE BECKHAM BRAND LIMITED READING PA 19606 SURGICAL SPECIALITIES CORPORATION ALVAREZ, JORGE A 95 MERRICK WAY 7TH FLOOR CORAL GABLES FL 33134 ACOSTA, PABLO 131 MADEIRA AVE PH COMMUNITY CONSULTANTS, INC. CORAL GABLES FL 33134 CLEVER DEVICES INC AMSTER, MATTHEW G COMTECH ENGINEERING 200 S BISCAYNE BLVD Ste 850 MIAMI FL 33131 FLORIDA DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC METRO GAS FL LLC NETZACH YISROEL TORAH CENTER, INC MIAMI DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SURGICAL PARK CENTER, LTD ADLER, BRIAN ANDARA, CHRISTOPHER D 1450 BRICKELL AVENUE SUITE 2300 11767 MEDICAL LLC MIAMI FL 33131 MIAMI FL 33156 19301 WEST DIXIE STORAGE, LLC ORBIS MEDICAL ANSALDOBREDA, INC ANDERSON, MELISSA P MIRON REALTY COMPANY 8555 NW 64TH STREET MODANI CAPITAL LLC DORAL FL 33166 PMG AVENTURA, LLC CROWN CASTLE USA SONNENKLAR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP THE ASSOC. -
Palestinian Forces
Center for Strategic and International Studies Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy 1800 K Street, N.W. • Suite 400 • Washington, DC 20006 Phone: 1 (202) 775 -3270 • Fax : 1 (202) 457 -8746 Email: [email protected] Palestinian Forces Palestinian Authority and Militant Forces Anthony H. Cordesman Center for Strategic and International Studies [email protected] Rough Working Draft: Revised February 9, 2006 Copyright, Anthony H. Cordesman, all rights reserved. May not be reproduced, referenced, quote d, or excerpted without the written permission of the author. Cordesman: Palestinian Forces 2/9/06 Page 2 ROUGH WORKING DRAFT: REVISED FEBRUARY 9, 2006 ................................ ................................ ............ 1 THE MILITARY FORCES OF PALESTINE ................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 2 THE OSLO ACCORDS AND THE NEW ISRAELI -PALESTINIAN WAR ................................ ................................ .............. 3 THE DEATH OF ARAFAT AND THE VICTORY OF HAMAS : REDEFINING PALESTINIAN POLITICS AND THE ARAB - ISRAELI MILITARY BALANCE ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 4 THE CHANGING STRUCTURE OF PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY FORC ES ................................ ................................ .......... 5 Palestinian Authority Forces During the Peace Process ................................ ................................ ..................... 6 The -
Private Bankers in Ontario Hayseed Capitalists: Private Bankers in Ontario
HAYSEED CAPITALISTS: PRIVATE BANKERS IN ONTARIO HAYSEED CAPITALISTS: PRIVATE BANKERS IN ONTARIO by STEPHEN EDWARD mORNING, B.A., M.A. A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy McMaster University August, 1994 -- -- --- - --------------- DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (1994) McMASTER UNIVERSITY (History) Hamilton, Ontario TITLE: Hayseed Capitalists: Private Bankers in Ontario AUTHOR: Stephen Edward Thorning, B.A. (University of Guelph) M.A. (McMaster University) SUPERVJSOR: Professor John C. Weaver NUMBER OF PAGES: viii, 502 ii ABSTRACT The structure of the Canadian banking system, and the establishment of strong chartered banks at a relatively early stage, have overshadowed banking institutions that operated outside the chartered system. The non-chartered or private banks can be categorized into three groups: the joint stock banks of the 1830s, the urban private bankers who appeared in the 1850s and after, and the small-town private banks of the post-1868 period. AJI three types of private banks were established to fill perceived niches in the chartered bank system. Those of the 1830s possessed an anti-establishment, hinterland bias. The urban private bankers specialized in savings and foreign exchange transactions, and often branched out into insurance, debentures, and ultimately stocks and bonds. The small town private banks began and prospered when the needs of small hinterland communities outpaced the inclination and ability of chartered banks to provide them with banking facilities. Unlike the urban private bankers, those in small towns offered a full range of banking services, and they often acted as insurance and real estate agencies as well.