Position Statement

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Position Statement Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm Onshore Ecology Clarification Notes - Position Statement Document Reference: ExA; ISH4; 10.D6.9 Deadline 6 Date: 05 April 2019 Photo: Kentish Flats Offshore Wind Farm Table of Contents 1 Summary of Onshore ecology Clarification Notes .......................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Clarification Note – Water Dependent Designated Sites ................................ 1 1.3 Clarification Note – Bat Impact Assessment – Paston Great Barn Special Area of Conservation (SAC) ................................................................................... 1 1.4 Clarification Note – Sediment Management at the River Wensum crossing ... 2 1.5 Clarification Note – Other Outstanding Issues ............................................... 4 Appendix 1 – Norfolk Vanguard Clarification Notes ........................................................... 5 Appendix 2 - Natural England’s responses ....................................................................... 10 Position Statement Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm April 2019 Page i 1 SUMMARY OF ONSHORE ECOLOGY CLARIFICATION NOTES 1.1 Introduction 1. During the Issue Specific Hearing on Environmental Matters (ISH4) on 27 March 2019, the Examining Authority (ExA) requested a position statement regarding outstanding issues following Natural England’s response to four clarification notes produced by the Applicant in relation to onshore ecology (Action Point 13). This position statement sets out the process that will be undertaken to progress these remaining issues. 2. A copy of the four clarification notes are included as Appendix 1 and Natural England’s responses are provided in Appendix 2. 1.2 Clarification Note – Water Dependent Designated Sites • First version issued to Natural England – 30.11.2018 • Natural England’s advice received – 08.01.2019 • Telecon to discuss Natural England’s comments – 22.01.2018 • Second version issued to Natural England – 27.02.2019 • Telecon to discuss content of clarification note – 27.02.2019 • Natural England’s advice received – 18.03.2019 (captured in Applicant’s responses to Examiners second written questions) 1.2.1 Natural England’s response “Concerns withdrawn Following receipt of further information on 27 February 2019 Natural England is satisfied that the specific issues we have raised in previous correspondence relating to the assessment of impacts to water dependant designated sites have been resolved.” 1.2.2 Applicant’s approach 3. No further action required. 1.3 Clarification Note – Bat Impact Assessment – Paston Great Barn Special Area of Conservation (SAC) • First version issued to Natural England – 30.11.2018 • Natural England’s advice received – 22.01.2019 • Telecon to discuss Natural England’s comments – 22.01.2018 • Second version issued to Natural England – 27.02.2019 • Telecon to discuss content of clarification note – 27.02.2019 • Natural England’s advice received – 20.03.2019 (captured in Applicant’s responses to Examiners second written questions) Position Statement Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm April 2019 Page 1 1.3.1 Natural England’s response “Concerns withdrawn Following receipt of further information on 27 February 2019 Natural England is satisfied that the specific issues we have raised in previous correspondence relating to the assessment of bats at Paston Great Barn SAC have been resolved. We advise that, as a requirement of the development, that prior to removal of hedgerows, an OLEM/EMP is developed in consultation with Natural England. The plan should include for the improvement of the hedgerows either side of the section to be removed including any gapping up, tree management and the development of scrub/rough grassland margins. The mitigation plan should be in place for 7 years or until the original hedgerow has recovered fully. Consideration could be given within the OLEM/EMP to the planting of more mature hedge plants, that could reduce the time required for these hedgerows to return to their original state/or better.” 1.3.2 Applicant’s approach 4. The Outline Landscape and Ecological Management Plan (OLEMS) will be updated to capture these commitments to affected hedgerows within 5km of Paston Great Barn SAC. The updated OLEMS will be submitted at Deadline 7. 5. No further action required. 1.4 Clarification Note – Sediment Management at the River Wensum crossing • Note issued to Natural England – 27.02.2019 • Telecon to discuss content of clarification note – 27.02.2019 • Natural England’s advice received – 18.03.2019 (captured in Applicant’s responses to Examiners second written questions) 1.4.1 Natural England’s response “Most concerns withdrawn. However further information is required regarding some elements. Following receipt of further information on 27 February 2019 Natural England is broadly satisfied that the specific issues we have raised in previous correspondence relating to the assessment of sediment management at the River Wensum crossing have been resolved. However, further clarification is still required with regards to: 1. Restoration plan outside of functional floodplain We would expect the detailed design to demonstrate that reseeding of bare ground within the River Wensum catchment would not have a detrimental effect on water quality within the River Wensum SAC. If a negative impact on water quality cannot be ruled out at the detailed design stage then turf stripping may be necessary within a wider area of the catchment, not just the floodplain. Natural England look forward to commenting on the detailed design; 2. Reinstatement of work areas Position Statement Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm April 2019 Page 2 Whilst the clarification note states that ‘any damage to ground conditions caused by vehicle tracking will be rectified prior to the reinstatement of topsoil/turf’, there are no details on how this will be done. Natural England would request further information in this regard; and 3. Number of HDD’s Natural England expects confirmation on the exact number of HDD crossings to be provided in the detailed scheme and programme which will include site specific water course crossing. Please note that whilst this clarification note broadly allays Natural England’s concerns with regards to impacts on River Wensum SAC / SSSI we would defer to the Environment Agency with regards to its suitability to allay any concerns regarding flood risk. Therefore, Natural England recommends that this clarification note is also provided to the Environment Agency for comment if this hasn’t already been done.” 1.4.2 Applicant’s approach 1.4.2.1 Restoration plan outside of the functional floodplain 6. The Applicant is considering Natural England’s suggestion that the approach to restoration of grassland (deep turf stripping and replacement – rather than re-seeding) may need to be applied to all grassland within the River Wensum catchment if it cannot be demonstrated that a negative impact on water quality can be ruled out. 7. The Applicant will provide further information to Natural England ahead of Issue Specific Hearing 6 on the approach to restoration outside of the functional floodplain. Subject to Natural England’s acceptance this detail will be incorporated in an update to the OLEMS. 1.4.2.2 Reinstatement of work areas 8. The Applicant will provide further information to Natural England ahead of Issue Specific Hearing 6 on the methods that will be employed to rectify damage to ground conditions caused by vehicle tracking. Subject to Natural England’s acceptance this detail will be incorporated into an update to the outline Code of Construction Practice (oCOCP). 1.4.2.3 Number of HDDs 9. The number of HDDs will be confirmed in a scheme of watercourse crossings to be submitted post-consent. This will include the design, mitigation and restoration of each watercourse crossing. The scheme will be submitted to and approved by the relevant planning authority in consultation with Natural England. This is secured through DCO Requirement 25. 10. The Sediment Management clarification note has also been provided to the Environment Agency (25.03.2019). The flood risk aspects outlined within the note have been captured within the Statement of Common Ground between the Applicant and The Environment Agency submitted at Deadline 4 (Rep2-SOCG-6.1) and all points related to flood risk are agreed between the two parties. Position Statement Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm April 2019 Page 3 11. No further action required. 1.5 Clarification Note – Other Outstanding Issues • Note issued to Natural England – 27.02.2019 • Telecon to discuss content of clarification note – 27.02.2019 • Natural England’s advice received – 18.03.2019 (captured in Applicant’s responses to Examiners second written questions) 1.5.1 Natural England’s response “Further information required to determine impacts on designated sites/landscapes. Broadland SPA/Ramsar site: This site was scoped out of the HRA on the basis that there was evidence of low levels of wintering birds associated with the SPA/Ramsar using the study area. However, this may have been due to the cropping regime at the time of survey. We requested that this point was taken account of by including additional measures, e.g. survey and/or WeBS data and information about predicted crop patterns at the time of the proposed work. We suggested that the Outline Landscape and Ecological Management Strategy (OLEMS) is amended to include
Recommended publications
  • Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm Statement of Common Ground Natural England
    Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm Statement of Common Ground Natural England Applicant: Norfolk Vanguard Limited Document Reference: Rep1 - SOCG - 13.1 Revision: 1 Date: January 2019 Author: Royal HaskoningDHV Photo: Kentish Flats Offshore Wind Farm Date Issue Remarks / Reason for Issue Author Checked Approved No. 22/08/18 00 First draft for Internal review GK/ST JA JA 23/08/18 01D First draft for Norfolk Vanguard Limited review GK/ST JA JA 05/09/18 02D Second draft for legal review GK/ST JA JA 10/10/2018 03D Third draft for Norfolk Vanguard Limited review GK/JA AD AD 17/10/18 04D Fourth draft for Norfolk Vanguard Limited review GK JA JA 12/11/18 05D Fifth draft for Norfolk Vanguard Limited review GK JA JA 20/11/18 06D Sixth draft for Norfolk Vanguard Limited review GK JA JA 03/01/19 07D Seventh draft GK/JA GK/JA JA 08/01/19 08D Eighth draft GK/JA GK/JA JA 11/01/19 09D Submission for Deadline 1 GK/JA GK/JA RS Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm Page i Table of Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 1.1 The Development ......................................................................................... 1 1.2 Consultation with Natural England ................................................................ 2 2 Statement of Common Ground ..................................................................... 3 2.1 Marine Geology, Oceanography and Physical Processes ................................. 3 2.2 Benthic and Intertidal Ecology ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Committee Agenda
    Planning Committee Agenda Members of the Planning Committee: Cllr S Lawn (Chairman) Cllr J M Ward (Vice-Chairman) Cllr A D Adams Cllr C Karimi-Ghovanlou Cllr S C Beadle Cllr I N Moncur Cllr N J Brennan Cllr S M Prutton Cllr J F Fisher Cllr S Riley Cllr R R Foulger Pool of trained substitutes Conservative Conservative Liberal Democrat Cllr S M Clancy Cllr G K Nurden Cllr D J Britcher Cllr J K Copplestone Cllr C E Ryman-Tubb Cllr S J Catchpole Cllr A D Crotch Cllr M D Snowling Cllr D G Harrison Cllr R M Grattan Cllr J L Thomas Cllr S I Holland Cllr K S Kelly Cllr K A Vincent Cllr K E Lawrence ** Not trained Cllr D King Cllr S A Vincent Cllr J A Neesam Cllr K G Leggett Cllr S C Walker Cllr L A Starling Cllr T M Mancini-Boyle Cllr F Whymark Cllr D M Thomas Cllr M L Murrell Date & Time: Wednesday 21 April 2021 at 9:30am Place: To be hosted remotely at: Thorpe Lodge, 1 Yarmouth Road, Thorpe St Andrew, Norwich Contact: Dawn Matthews tel (01603) 430404 Email: [email protected] Website: www.broadland.gov.uk PUBLIC ATTENDANCE: This meeting will be live streamed for public viewing via the following link: Broadland YouTube Channel You may register to speak by emailing us at [email protected] no later than 3pm on Friday 16 April 2021 Large print version can be made available If you have any special requirements in order to attend this meeting, please let us know in advance.
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm Appendix 23.1 Onshore Winter / Passage Bird Survey Scoping Report
    Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm Appendix 23.1 Onshore Winter / Passage Bird Survey Scoping Report Environmental Statement Volume 3 - Appendices Applicant: Norfolk Vanguard Limited Document Reference: 6.2.23.1 RHDHV Reference: PB4476-005-0231 Pursuant to: APFP Regulation 5(2)(a) Date: June 2018 Revision: Version 1 Author: Royal HaskoningDHV Photo: Kentish Flats Offshore Wind Farm Environmental Impact Assessment Environmental Statement Document Reference: PB4476-005-0231 June 2018 For and on behalf of Norfolk Vanguard Limited Approved by: Ruari Lean, Rebecca Sherwood Signed: th Date: 8 June 2018 For and on behalf of Royal HaskoningDHV Drafted by: Gordon Campbell Approved by: Jon Allen Signed: th Date: 25 May 2018 Environmental Statement Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm PB4476-005-0231 Page ii Date Issue Remarks / Reason for Issue Author Checked Approved No. 09/04/18 01D First draft for Norfolk Vanguard Limited review GC/MG RH AD 25/05/18 01F Final for ES submission GC/MG ST AD Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm PB4476-005-0231 Page iii Table of Contents 23 Onshore Winter Passage Bird Survey Scoping Report ............................................... 1 23.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 23.2 Methodology .......................................................................................................... 5 23.3 Baseline Environment ........................................................................................... 10 23.4 Screening
    [Show full text]
  • GREATER NORWICH DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP TECHNICAL CONSULTATION FULL REPORT (Final Draft)
    GREATER NORWICH DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP TECHNICAL CONSULTATION FULL REPORT (Final draft) Prepared for Greater Norwich Development Partnership Thorpe Lodge, Yarmouth Road Thorpe St Andrew Norwich NR7 0DU Prepared by: Michael Mackman BA (Hons), MMRS, FCIM, Chartered Marketer 14 November 2008 Greater Norwich Development Partnership – Joint Core Strategy Consultation P08872 14 November 2008 Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Obviously, the evaluation of the comments on the GNDP Regulation 25 consultation is a matter for the Partnership. However, it may be helpful to draw out some common and recurring themes. There are many expressions of concern about the effects of further development on key local infrastructure. These include (but are not exclusively) water and sewerage, health services, transportation/ roads, community facilities and infrastructure, education, policing and the environment (including impacts on SSSIs, nature reserves and green spaces). Many respondents express views to the effect that local resources are at capacity or above, and that further development must bring with it benefits to support new populations, wherever housed. There are particular concerns in some rural communities, although some also welcome controlled development as a means of assuring or enhancing local services, and request a higher development “status” or the development of specific sites. Others are concerned about “knock on” effects on local infrastructure, including roads, local schools and so on. This is coupled with concerns about sustainability, the desirability of “green infrastructure” and about ensuring that new development has the minimum carbon footprint. There are also suggestions about measures to improve the carbon footprint of existing developments, for example, through renewables technology. Unsurprisingly, these concerns are balanced by suggestions from agents, landowners, developers and businesses suggesting the desirability of additional development, or the development of specific sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D – Maps and Appraisal Tables of Proposed Waste
    Appendix D – Maps and appraisal tables of proposed waste management facilities Page Map legend D2 Breckland site maps D3 WS1 Land at Summer Lane, Carbrooke D3 WS2 Former mineral working at Heath Road, Snetterton D4 Broadland site maps D5 WS3 Land at Atlas Works, Norwich Road, Lenwade D5 WS4 Land off Long Lane, Ludham D6 King’s Lynn and West Norfolk site maps D7 WS5 – Land off Mill Drove, at Blackborough End landfill site D7 WS6 – Land north of Main Road, Crimplesham D8 Appraisal tables WS1 Land at Summer Lane, Carbrooke D9 WS2 Former mineral working at Heath Road, Snetterton D13 WS3 Land at Atlas Works, Norwich Road, Lenwade D17 WS4 Land off Long Lane, Ludham D22 WS5 Land off Mill Drove, at Blackborough End landfill site D26 WS6 Land north of Main Road, Crimplesham D30 Please note that there are no proposed sites located within the following Local Planning Authority Areas: Great Yarmouth, North Norfolk, South Norfolk. D1 D2 WS1 - Land at Summer Lane, Carbrooke D3 WS2 Former mineral working at Heath Road, Snetterton D4 WS3 Land at Atlas Works, Norwich Road, Lenwade D5 WS4 Land off Long Lane, Ludham D6 WS5 – Land east of Mill Drove, at Blackborough End landfill site D7 WS6 – Land at Main Road, Crimplesham D8 Appraisal tables of proposed waste management sites WS1 Land at Summer Lane, Carbrooke, IP25 6TJ Proposal: screening, separating and bulking of waste materials, composting and soil treatment. The site is proposed to take hazardous, non-hazardous and inert waste. Estimated throughput: 100,000 to 120,000 tonnes per annum Size of site: 9.3 ha SA Objective Comments Assessment of Waste Management Uses SA1: To adapt to The site is 0.27km from Watton and + and mitigate the 10km from Dereham, which are the The proposed waste management effects of climate nearest towns.
    [Show full text]
  • RSPB REEDBED Plan Co-Ordinator: RSPB Plan Leader: Date: Stage: 31 December 1998 Final Draft June 2004 Revised Draft (Under Review) August 2005 Final Revised Draft
    NORFOLK BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN Ref 1/H1 Tranche 1 Habitat Action Plan 1 Plan Author: RSPB REEDBED Plan Co-ordinator: RSPB Plan Leader: Date: Stage: 31 December 1998 Final draft June 2004 Revised draft (under review) August 2005 Final revised draft 1. CURRENT STATUS Definition • Reedbed is defined in this plan as S4 NVC communities; all other communities containing reed to be included in the fen action plan. • In Broadland, the fen resource has been surveyed and mapped. The distribution of reedbed vegetation by valley is as follows: S4 S4 transitions S26 Ant Valley 43.76ha 8.7ha 4.75ha Thurne Valley 112.95ha 25.92ha 3.13ha Muckfleet Valley 10.49ha 0.06ha 4.07ha Bure Valley 27.68ha 5.9ha 64.39ha Yare Valley 43.64ha - 279.07ha Waveney Valley 6.46ha 0.92ha 63.75ha • A rare habitat. The RSPB Reedbed Inventory suggests over 1,540 ha in Norfolk - almost 30% of the UK resource. However, the definition of reedbed used for this inventory was wider than that proposed here. Tables 1 and 2 below show the sites over 20 and 10 ha respectively from the inventory excluding known fen sites. • Reedbeds of less than 10 hectares are listed in Table 3 below. Some of these sites are known to support priority species, including bittern. • Over 50 species of conservation concern in Norfolk depend fully or partly on reedbeds and associated fens. However further research is necessary to fully identify the status of many species. The following are likely to provide the main focus: • birds - bittern, bearded tit, marsh harrier, Savi’s warbler; • mammals - otter, water shrew, harvest mouse; • moths - small dotted footman, Fenn’s wainscot, reed leopard; • other invertebrates - including BAP species such as the diving beetle (Bidessus unistriatus).
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk Boreas Limited Document Reference: 6.3.22.11 RHDHV Reference: PB5640-006-2211 Pursuant to APFP Regulation: 5(2)(A)
    Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm Appendix 22.11 Norfolk Vanguard Onshore Ecology Consultation Responses Environmental Statement Volume 3 Applicant: Norfolk Boreas Limited Document Reference: 6.3.22.11 RHDHV Reference: PB5640-006-2211 Pursuant to APFP Regulation: 5(2)(a) Date: June 2019 Revision: Version 1 Author: Royal HaskoningDHV Photo: Ormonde Offshore Wind Farm Date Issue Remarks / Reason for Issue Author Checked Approved No. 14/02/2019 01D First draft for Norfolk Boreas Limited review GC CD/ AmH CD 22/03/2019 01F Final for DCO submission GC CD JL Environmental Statement Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm 6.3.22.11 June 2019 Page i Table of Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 2 Consultation responses Norfolk Vanguard ............................................................... 1 3 References ........................................................................................................... 33 Environmental Statement Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm 6.3.22.11 June 2019 Page ii Tables Table 2.1 Norfolk Vanguard Consultation and Comments 2 Environmental Statement Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm 6.3.22.11 June 2019 Page iii Glossary of Acronyms CoCP Code of Construction Practice DCO Development Consent Order EIA Environmental Impact Assessment ES Environmental Statement ETG Expert Topic Group HVAC High Voltage Alternating Current HVDC High Voltage Direct Current OLEMS Outline Landscape and Ecological Management Strategy PEIR Preliminary Environmental Information Report SoS Secretary of State Glossary of Terminology Cable pulling Installation of cables within pre-installed ducts from jointing pits located along the onshore cable route. Ducts A duct is a length of underground piping, which is used to house electrical and communication cables. Evidence Plan Process A voluntary consultation process with specialist stakeholders to agree the approach to the EIA and information to support the HRA.
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk Rivers Drainage Board
    Water Management Alliance (Eastern) Norfolk Rivers Drainage Board BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN April 2018 NORFOLK RIVERS IDB – BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN Front cover images (L-R) ; Himalayan Basalm; Barn Owl; White Clawed Crayfish; Otter; River Nar; IDB Digger 2 FOREWORD This Biodiversity Action Plan (Second Edition) has been prepared by the Norfolk Rivers Internal Drainage Board, in accordance with the commitment to the Implementation Plan of the DEFRA Internal Drainage Board Review, requiring IDBs to produce their own Biodiversity Action Plans by April 2010. As such, the original version was published in January 2010. This revised version aims to continue to align the Norfolk Rivers IDB with biodiversity policy and more specifically, the Biodiversity document for England, “Biodiversity 2020: A strategy for Englands’ Wildlife and Ecosystem Services” and build on the Government’s 25 Year Environmental Plan; A Green Future. In doing so, the document strives to demonstrate the Board’s commitment to fulfilling its duty as a public body under the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006, to conserve biodiversity. Many of the Board’s activities have benefits and opportunities for biodiversity, not least its water level management and watercourse maintenance work. It is hoped that this Biodiversity Action Plan will help the Board to maximise the biodiversity benefits from its activities and demonstrate its contribution to the targets as part of the Biodiversity 2020 strategy and achieve wider environmental improvement within its catchments. The Board has adopted the Biodiversity Action Plan as one of its policies and subject to available resources is committed to its implementation. It will review the plan periodically and update it as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • County Wildlife Sites – Breckland 2018
    County Wildlife Sites – Breckland 2018 Site Site Name Last Survey Transboundary Grid reference Number Date (T) or registered common (C) 169 Coston Meadow 85 T (SN) 170 River Yare Corridor 85 T (SN) 177 Bickerston Meadow 9/95 T (SN) 178 The Carrs 6/95 T (SN) 541 West and Pentney Commons 9/95 & 6/97 T (WN) 542 Sovereign Meadow 10/95 T (WN) 593 Little Ouse Meadow 85 TM 003800 594 Little Fen 7/96 TM 035792 595 The Lows 7/09 TM 032789 596 Adj. Little Fen 85 TM 046799 597 Old Fen 9/95 TM 000807 598 Broomscott Common 7/16 C TM 004806 599 Oak Plantation 85 TM 006803 600 Wood near Garboldisham 5/96 TM 016846 601 Lang Fen (South) 4/96 TM 063800 602 Holland’s Wood 5/96 TM 050822 603 Lopham Grove 85 TM 062838 604 Broom Covert and Downhill Plantation 09/07 TM 020863 605 East Harling Fen 8/96 TM 000874 607 The Lows 8/96 TM 014880 608 West of Quidenham 6/96 TM 020877 611 Arnold’s Belt 85 TM 043880 614 Adj. to River Wittle 8/96 TM 009880 615 East Harling Common 8/96 TM 005882 616 Adj. River Wittle 8/96 TM 008881 618 Common Plantation 8/96 TM 035885 619 Copince’s Fen 85 TM 049883 620 Eccles Wood (North) 8/96 TM 013895 621 Eccles Wood (Middle) 8/96 TM 013893 622 Eccles Wood (South) 8/96 TM 017890 623 The Carr 5/96 TM 024890 624 Jubilee Plantation 5/96 TM 064896 625 Warren and Nuttery Plantation 5/96 TM 062898 626 Stacksford Wood 8/13 TM 052903 627 Lower Plantation 5/96 TM 060905 630 New Buckenham Common (north) 85 C TM 095910 632 East of Old Buckenham Fen 5/96 TM 052921 633 Abbey Farm Meadow 5/96 TM 073926 634 West Moor 85 TM 067946 635 Hargham Estate 5/96
    [Show full text]
  • I YARE CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN I I CONSULTATION
    NRA-Anglian 59 i YARE CATCHMENT I MANAGEMENT PLAN I CONSULTATION REPORT ~ L /: SPAIDING • »«*»»■ « NRA National Rivers Authority Anglian Region January 1994 ■ E n v ir o n m e n t Ag e n c y NATIONAL LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE HEAD OFFICE Rio House, Waterside Drive, Aztec West, Almondsbury, Bristol BS32 4UD YARE CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN FOREWORD Established in 1989 the National Rivers Authority has as it’s role the "Guardians of the Water Environment". As such it is committed to protecting and improving the water environment in its broadest sense. Establishing a sound planning base for the development of river catchments is essential to our future management. Integrated Catchment Management Planning will play an increasingly important role in the NRA’s management of the water environment. Demands upon catchments are many and varied, and conflicts require careful consideration. The enhancement of the water environment is one of the main aims of consultation with individuals and organisations having an interest in the catchment is seen as essential. This report examines the Rivers Yare, Wensum, Bure and Waveney catchments. A large proportion of the plan area is recognised internationally as being environmentally important and the tidal reaches of the rivers form one of Europe’s most important lowland wetlands. The Broads which are a fundamental part of the unique nature of the catchment are under stress due to over-enrichment. Our current research is central to Broads Restoration and reflects the NRA’s belief that such initiatives alongside this consultation form an important way of maintaining co-operation and collaboration within the catchment.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Nat Env 2016-18.Pub
    State of the Natural Environment in Norfolk 2016 - 2018 Danielle Engelbrecht and Lizzy Oddy Norfolk Biodiversity Information Service Coverphoto: Fieldof Orchids © Danielle Engelbrecht, Above: Hoof fungus © Danielle Engelbrecht Fragrant Orchid at Whitwell Common © Ed Stocker 2 State of the Natural Environment in Norfolk Contents Introduction ……………………………………………………… 4 Species in Norfolk ……………………………………………... 5 How many species have been recorded in Norfolk? ………………….. 6 Non-native species in Norfolk ……………………………………………. 6 Species case study: Anguilla anguilla - The European Eel …………… 7 Species case study: Lasius neglectus - The UK’s first invasive ant spe- 8 cies….…………………………………………………………………………. New & nearly new species for Norfolk 2016-17 ………………………….. 9 New & nearly new species for Norfolk 2017-18 ………………………….. 10 Species case study: Loxia pytyopsittacus - Parrot Crossbill………………. 11 Species case study: Anacamptis morio - Green-winged Orchid ………. 12 Habitats in Norfolk ……………………………………………. .. 13 Habitat types in Norfolk and why they are important …………………... 13 Habitat case study: Pingos ………………………………………………... 16 Habitat case study: Lowland Heathland ………………………………... 17 Protected sites in Norfolk …………………………………….. 18 What does the site designation mean? …………………………………. 19 The effect of public access & recreation on Natura 2000 Sites ……. 21 SSSI and Local Site condition ……………………..…………………….. 22 Protected site case study: Whitwell Common SSSI …………………... 23 Protected site case study: Hickling Broad NNR, SSSI, Ramsar, SPA 24 and SAC …………………………………………………………………….. 3 Introduction The natural environment is one of Norfolk’s greatest assets. Its landscapes and wildlife draw in people from far afield, whilst its habitats and protected sites support fantastic species diversity. From the majestic north coast, to the rolling arable fields, from the lakes and ditches of the Broads to the forests of Breckland, there is something to discover in every corner of the county.
    [Show full text]
  • SCOPING OPINION Proposed Hornsea Three Offshore Wind Farm
    SCOPING OPINION Proposed Hornsea Three Offshore Wind Farm Planning Inspectorate Reference: EN010080 December 2016 Scoping Opinion for Hornsea Project Three Offshore Wind Farm TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................... 3 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................... 5 BACKGROUND ..........................................................................................5 THE SECRETARY OF STATE’S CONSULTATION..............................................6 STRUCTURE OF THE DOCUMENT ............ .................................................7 2 THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT .................................................. 8 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................8 THE APPLICANT’S INFORMATION ........... ..................................................18 THE SECRETARY OF STATE’S COMMENTS.............................................23 3 EIA APPROACH AND TOPIC AREAS ........................................... 23 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 23 EU DIRECTIVE 2014/52/EU ...................................................................... 24 NATIONAL POLICY STATEMENTS (NPS) ..................................................... 23 ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT APPROACH ................................................. 24 ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT STRUCTURE ................................................ 25 MATTERS
    [Show full text]