DOCSLIB.ORG

Car Park & Adjoining Land, Lion Green Rd, Coulsdon

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Car Park & Adjoining Land, Lion Green Rd, Coulsdon planning report D&P/3098/02 7 May 2014 Car Park & adjoining land, Lion Green Rd, Coulsdon in the London Borough of Croydon planning application no. 13/02178/P Strategic planning application stage II referral Town & Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended); Greater London Authority Acts 1999 and 2007; Town & Country Planning (Mayor of London) Order 2008 The proposal Demolition of existing buildings; erection of a building comprising a 4,679 sq.m. (GIA) supermarket, 932 sq.m. health facility and new storage building (for the existing scout hall); formation of vehicular access, provision of 213 car parking spaces and associated landscaping. The applicant The applicant is Croydon Urban Regeneration Vehicle (CCURV), the agent is Indigo Planning Ltd and the architect is EPR Architects Ltd. Strategic issues At the consultation stage, Croydon Council was advised that the application is broadly acceptable in strategic planning terms, subject to the resolution of issues relating to retail/town centre use, historic environment, inclusive access, sustainable development, and transport, which have now been satisfactorily addressed. The Council’s decision In this instance, Croydon Council has resolved to grant planning permission, subject to conditions. Recommendation That Croydon Council be advised that the Mayor is content for it to determine the case itself, subject to any action that the Secretary of State may take, and does not therefore wish to direct refusal or direct that he is to be the local planning authority. Context 1 On 24 July 2013, the Mayor of London received documents from Croydon Council notifying him of a planning application of potential strategic importance to develop the above site for the above uses. This was referred to the Mayor under Category 3F of the Schedule to the Order 2008: 3F “Development for a use, other than residential use, which includes the provision of more than 200 car parking spaces in connection with that use”. 2 On 28 August 2013, the Mayor considered planning report D&P/3098/01, and subsequently advised Croydon Council that the application is broadly acceptable in strategic planning terms, subject to the resolution of the issues set in paragraph 67 of that report. 3 A copy of the above-mentioned report is attached. The essentials of the case with regard to the proposal, the site, case history, strategic planning issues and relevant policies and guidance are as set out therein, unless otherwise stated in this report. Since then, the application has been revised in response to the Mayor’s concerns (see below) and further information provided. On 3 April 2014, Croydon Council decided that it was minded to grant planning permission, subject to conditions, for the revised application, and on 24 April 2014 it advised the Mayor of this decision. Under the provisions of Article 5 of the Town & Country Planning (Mayor of London) Order 2008, the Mayor may allow the draft decision to proceed unchanged, or direct Croydon Council under Article 6 to refuse the application. The Mayor has until 7 May 2014 to notify the Council of his decision and to issue any direction. 4 The decision on this case, and the reasons will be made available on the GLA’s website www.london.gov.uk. Update 5 At the consultation stage, Croydon Council was advised that the application is broadly acceptable in strategic planning terms, subject to the resolution of the issues set out in paragraph 67 of the above-mentioned report: Retail/town centre use: The principle of the development does not present any strategic planning issues, although further information is required on the impact of the scheme on other investments in the catchment area and the impact on comparison goods retailers in the Coulsdon Primary Shopping Area. Historic environment: Evidence of English Heritage agreement with the proposals is required before it can be determined if the proposal complies with London Plan policy. Inclusive access: The proposals are supported in principle although further information is required on parking arrangements and shared surface segregation. Sustainable development: It cannot yet be determined if the proposal complies with London Plan Policy 5.2. The applicant should provide further energy efficiency modelling information; further information on future connection to a district heating network; and further information on the proposed energy centre. The use of the large flat roof for climate change adaptation should also be considered. Transport: The application does not accord with London Plan Policies 6.1, 6.3, 6.12 and 6.13. The Transport Assessment should be revised to only include the most comparable sites and further analysis of highway impacts, including revised modelling, is required. Appropriate mitigation measures may be required following this analysis. The Travel Plan should be revised to include positive travel planning measures for customers of the supermarket and should be secured, monitored and enforced through a section 106 agreement. A Construction Logistics Plan (CLP), Car Park Management Plan and a Delivery and Servicing Plan (DSP) should be secured by condition and approved prior to commencement of the development. 6 Since the Mayor made these initial representations, additional information has been provided and the application revised. An updated assessment against the issues raised previously is provided under the corresponding headings below. Coulsdon Masterplan 7 In September 2012, Croydon Council adopted the Coulsdon Masterplan as interim planning guidance. Following adoption, the Coulsdon Masterplan was subject to a legal challenge and has subsequently been withdrawn. Therefore, the document is not relevant to the determination of the application; however this does not affect the conclusions of either the Council’s Committee Report, the Stage One Report or this Report. Principle of development - Retail/town centre use 8 The Stage One report identified that the applicant’s Retail Statement adequately analyses the limited impact of the scheme on other town and local centres; however, more information was requested on the impact of the proposal on existing, committed and planned public and private investment in Coulsdon. The Stage One report also requested further analysis of the effect on comparison goods retailers in Coulsdon town centre. 9 In response, the applicant has provided a detailed analysis on the impact of the proposed development on the Red Lion public house site; the 127 Brighton Road (Pinewood Motors) site; the land adjoining East Croydon Station site (outside Coulsdon); as well as the impact on comparison goods retailing within Coulsdon town centre. The analysis concludes that the proposal would not have significant adverse impacts on either the viability or vitality of Coulsdon town centre or pipeline schemes. This is accepted and the proposals now comply with London Plan policy in this respect. Historic environment 10 The site is adjacent to an earth embankment that once formed part of the Surrey Iron Railway and is a Scheduled Ancient Monument (SAM). The applicant provided a Historic Environment Assessment, which concludes that the proposal will have negligible impacts on underground heritage assets and significant benefits to the visibility and appreciation of the SAM. As requested at Stage One, the applicant has provided evidence of meetings and correspondence with English Heritage confirming that it is satisfied with the proposals. Detail of the landscape works and development affecting the heritage assets have been secured by condition. The proposals now comply with London Plan policies on the historic environment. Inclusive access 11 Fourteen blue badge parking bays have been provided for the foodstore element adjacent to the lifts, in line with London Plan Policy 6.13 ‘Parking’ and Table 6.2. As requested at Stage One, the applicant has confirmed that the car park layout is designed so that if additional adaptable spaces are required, they can be easily accommodated within the existing layout. 12 The applicant has also provided further information on the layout of the new access road, including two parking bays, in front of the health centre. At the junction with Lion Green Road, flush kerbs are proposed in order to allow for the smooth transition of the pedestrian crossing point. The use of granite upstand kerbs, granite flush kerbs, bollard protection areas and pedestrian access routes will ensure that the area is safe, usable and navigable for disabled people and the proposals now meet London Plan accessibility requirements. Sustainable development Energy 13 As requested at Stage One, the applicant has provided a BRUKL output document from the modelling undertaken, which supports the claimed level of savings from energy efficiency in the energy assessment. 14 The applicant has also confirmed that the development is designed to allow both the retail store and the healthcare facility to connect to a district heating network should one become available. 15 At Stage One, the applicant was requested to investigate serving both the retail store and the health centre from a single energy centre. However, as all building uses are adjacent to Lion Green Road, it is accepted that a single energy centre will not facilitate connection to a district heating network any more than separate plant rooms. 16 As the energy efficiency saving figures have been evidenced by modelling and the results accepted, the proposal now comply with London Plan energy requirements. Climate change adaptation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Land at Purley Baptist Church, 1 Russell Hill Road, 1-4 Russell Hill
    Rob Pearson Our ref: APP/L5240/V/17/3174139 Director Your ref: Nexus Planning Ltd Riverside House 2a Southwark Bridge Road London SE1 9HA 9 July 2020 By email only: [email protected] Dear Sir TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 – SECTION 77 APPLICATION MADE BY THORNSETT GROUP AND PURLEY BAPTIST CHURCH LAND AT PURLEY BAPTIST CHURCH, 1 RUSSELL HILL ROAD, 1-4 RUSSELL HILL PARADE, 2-12 BRIGHTON ROAD, PURLEY HALL AND 1-9 BANSTEAD ROAD, PURLEY APPLICATION REF: 16/02994/P 1. I am directed by the Secretary of State to say that consideration has been given to the report of Paul Jackson BArch (Hons) RIBA, who held a public local inquiry between 3 and 6 December 2019 into your client’s full phased application for planning permission for the demolition of existing buildings on two sites; erection of a 3 to 17 storey development on the ‘Island Site’ (Purley Baptist Church, 1 Russell Hill Road, 1-4 Russell Hill Parade, 2-12 Brighton Road), comprising 114 residential units, community and church space and a retail unit; and a 3 to 8 storey development on the ‘South Site’ (1-9 Banstead Road) comprising 106 residential units and any associated landscaping and works, in accordance with application ref: 16/02994/P, dated 20 May 2016. 2. On 12 April 2017, the Secretary of State directed, in pursuance of Section 77 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, that your client’s application be referred to him instead of being dealt with by the local planning authority.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2017
    The London Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2017 Part of the London Plan evidence base COPYRIGHT Greater London Authority November 2017 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk More London London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 Copies of this report are available from www.london.gov.uk 2017 LONDON STRATEGIC HOUSING LAND AVAILABILITY ASSESSMENT Contents Chapter Page 0 Executive summary 1 to 7 1 Introduction 8 to 11 2 Large site assessment – methodology 12 to 52 3 Identifying large sites & the site assessment process 53 to 58 4 Results: large sites – phases one to five, 2017 to 2041 59 to 82 5 Results: large sites – phases two and three, 2019 to 2028 83 to 115 6 Small sites 116 to 145 7 Non self-contained accommodation 146 to 158 8 Crossrail 2 growth scenario 159 to 165 9 Conclusion 166 to 186 10 Appendix A – additional large site capacity information 187 to 197 11 Appendix B – additional housing stock and small sites 198 to 202 information 12 Appendix C - Mayoral development corporation capacity 203 to 205 assigned to boroughs 13 Planning approvals sites 206 to 231 14 Allocations sites 232 to 253 Executive summary 2017 LONDON STRATEGIC HOUSING LAND AVAILABILITY ASSESSMENT Executive summary 0.1 The SHLAA shows that London has capacity for 649,350 homes during the 10 year period covered by the London Plan housing targets (from 2019/20 to 2028/29). This equates to an average annualised capacity of 64,935 homes a year.
    [Show full text]
  • 16 Archaeological Priority Areas in Croydon Logical Priority Areas In
    ArchaeoArchaeologicallogical Priority Areas in Croydon A total of 30 Archaeological Priority Areas are recommended for Croydon of which eight are Tier 1 APAs, 21 are Tier 2 APAs and one is a Tier 3 APA. The revised APAs would cover approximately 37% of the borough, increasing from 24% previously. A number of former Archaeological Priority Areas are not included in the new list of APAs. This is because following appraisal it was decided that they did not fulfil the selection criteria and have therefore been omitted from the revised list. Tier 1 APAs Size (HA) 1.1 Croham Hurst Round Barrow 0.66 1.2 Riddlesdown Road 6.37 1.3 Farthing Down 85.92 1.4 Lion Green Road 3.55 1.5 Park Lane Anglo-Saxon Cemetery 1.31 1.6 Russell Hill 24.66 1.7 Elmers End 3.97 1.8 RAF Kenley 78.95 ToToTotalTo tal = 205.39 Tier 2 APAs 2.1 Addington and Addington Park 162.19 2.2 Central Croydon 90.25 2.3 Old Coulsdon 14.84 2.4 Sanderstead 37.13 2.5 Watendone 9.09 2.6 Ampere Way 126.69 2.7 Waddon 65.93 2.8 Mere Bank 61.83 2.9 Addington Hills 104.36 2.10 Croham Hurst 82.36 2.11 Pampisford Road 31.49 2.12 Pollards Hill 4.03 2.13 Deepfield Way 1.95 2.14 Hook Hill 14.99 2.15 Cane Hill 79.27 16 2.16 Ashburton Park 8.54 2.17 Haling Grove 3.97 2.18 Norwood Grove 9.99 2.19 London to Brighton Roman Road 335.35 2.20 London to Lewes Roman Road 37.54 2.21 Croydon 19 th Century Cemeteries 14.35 Total = 1296.14 Tier 3 APAs 3.1 Croydon Downs 1672.15 Total = 1672.15 Total area of all Archaeological PrPriiiiorityority Areas in Croydon = 3173.68 17 527000 528000 529000 530000 531000 532000
    [Show full text]
  • Phil Thomas Page 1 of 5 02/06/2016
    Page 1 of 5 Phil Thomas From: "Chris Philp MP" <[email protected]> Date: 17 May 2016 12:47 To: <[email protected]> Subject: Update from Chris Philp MP on Southern Rail, Coulsdon parking, Purley Re-cycling Centre and other issues Dear All I am continuing to work hard on local and national issues as Croydon South’s MP and this email contains updates on some local issues you may find of interest. I have also held 15 street stalls on Saturday mornings on high streets around the constituency in the past 8 months and met with hundreds of local residents. The first item below is about the appalling service offered by Southern Rail. I am hosting a public meeting with them on 24 th May – please do come along if you can. Please also forward this email to any friends, family and neighbours who may be interested. Southern Rail Public Meeting Southern Rail has been one of the biggest issues facing our neighbourhood for some time. The constant delays have plighted commuters and leisure travellers alike. I have been complaining to Ministers, Southern and Network Rail and it is now time for residents to get a chance to hear from the train companies directly. To this end, I am hosting a public meeting on 24 th May at 7.30pm at Purley United Reform Church (in the hall). This is at 906 Brighton Road, Purley CR8 2LN, next to the hospital. There is no parking on site, so people driving are advised to use the multi-storey or the pay & display hospital car park.
    [Show full text]
  • Confidence Now Building As Town Attracts Investors
    Big success Confidence now as cycling building as town elite speed attracts investors PROMINENT investors are across town tapping into Croydon’s potential with a succession of THOUSANDS of people lined the major deals helping to change streets of Croydon as the town hosted the face of the town. a hugely successful round of cycling’s elite team competition on Tuesday, Consultant surveyor Vanessa June 2. Clark (pictured) believes deals such as Hermes Investment The town was the subject of an Management’s purchase of the hour-long highlights package on recently-refurbished Number ITV4 after hosting round three of the One Croydon, one of the town’s women’s Matrix Fitness Grand Prix most iconic buildings, are and round seven of the men’s Pearl “game-changing” in terms of Izumi Tour Series. the way the town is being And the event got people talking perceived. about Croydon in a fresh light as, “The good news is that quality central London what the experts described as a investors now see Croydon as an attractive “hugely-technical” circuit produced a proposition,”she said. “A s confidence in the town thrilling evening’s racing. has improved, so have prices.” Council leader Tony Newman and The so-called 50p Building, designed by Richard Mayor of Croydon Councillor Seifert, changed hands in a reported £36 million Patricia Hay-Justice were among the deal, bringing Hermes’ investment in the town this presentation teams. WHEELS IN MOTION: The cycling tour events held in Croydon earlier this month were hailed as a success year to around £70 million, having already acquired the Grants Entertainment Centre in High Street, which features a 10-screen Vue Cinema, health club, bars and restaurants.
    [Show full text]
  • Routes 404 and 434 Consultation Report
    Proposed changes to routes 404 and 434 Consultation Report November 2019 Contents Executive summary ..................................................................................................... 4 Summary of main issues raised during consultation ................................................ 4 Next steps ................................................................................................................ 4 1. About the proposals ............................................................................................ 6 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Purpose .......................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Detailed description of proposals ................................................................... 7 2. About the consultation ...................................................................................... 11 2.1 Purpose ........................................................................................................ 11 2.2 Potential outcomes ....................................................................................... 11 2.3 Who we consulted ........................................................................................ 11 2.4 Dates and duration ....................................................................................... 12 2.6 What we asked ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Local Resident Submissions to the London Borough of Croydon Electoral Review
    Local resident submissions to the London Borough of Croydon electoral review This PDF document contains submissions from residents in Croydon. The submissions from have been collated into one document. They have been sorted alphabetically, by surname. (L-Q) Maureen 2 Levy Colin Hart 1 Anthony 1 Harris Graham 1 Bass Simon Hoar 1 Anne Giles 1 Andy 1 Stranack Margaret 1 Bird Mario 2 Creatura Tim Pollard 2 Brian 1 Longman and Phil Thomas Scott Roche 1 Amy Pollard 1 Anthony 2 Pearson Gareth 1 Streeter Graeme 1 Fillmore Jonathan 1 Cope Lara Fish 1 Luke 1 Springthorpe Mark 1 Johnson Samir 1 Dwesar Sylvia 1 Macdonald Sarah Davis 1 Anthony 2 Pearson Alasdair 1 Stewart Badsha 1 Quadir Chris Philp 1 Chris Wright 1 Croydon 1 Conservativ e Group Dudley 1 Mead Fredeic 1 Demay Gavin 1 Barwell Helen 1 Pollard Jason 1 Cummings Lianne 1 Bruney Luke Clancy 1 Lynne Hale 1 Mario 2 Creatura Michael 1 Neal Mike Fisher 1 Richard 1 Chatterjee Robert 1 Sleeman Sara 1 Bashford Simon Brew 1 Sue Bennett 1 Tim Pollard 2 Yvette 1 Hopley Adam 1 O'Neill Adrian 1 Dennis Andrew 1 Frazer Ann Willard 1 Anthony 1 Sandford Catherine 1 Saunders Cheryl Purle 1 Christopher 1 King Croydon 1 South Labour Party David 1 Cantrell Deirdre Lea 1 Dennis King 1 Derek Lea 1 Diane 1 Hearne Elizabeth 1 Agyepong Fenella 1 Cardwell Gisela 1 James Janet 1 Stollery Jill Kilsby 1 Joseph 1 Rowe Kate Liffen 1 London 1 Borough of Croydon Maggie 2 Jackson Maggie 2 Jackson Martin 1 Wheatley Matthew 1 Taylor Michael 1 Bevington Paul Scott 1 Peter 1 Morgan Phil Reed 1 Philippa 1 Toogood Rita Barfoot 1 Sharon 1 Swaby Sheila 1 Childs Thornton 1 Heath Neighbourho od Association and BLP Toby 1 Keynes While consultation deadlines have prevented many of the organisations from making submissions, they have still taken steps to encourage their local members to respond, highlighting the way the draft recommendations run counter to local identities.
    [Show full text]
  • Consultation Responses on Core Strategy Issues and Options - Initial Report (Including Sustainability Appraisal) 1
    Appendix 8: Consultation Responses on Core Strategy Issues and Options - Initial Report (including Sustainability Appraisal) 1. Setting the Scene Page/Paragraph/ Representation Recommended response Full Name Objective Organisation Nature of Response Officer Recommendation page20/questionAO2 The draft core strategy lacks proposals to The Core Strategy will make Mr Andrew implement the blue ribbon policies in the London specific reference to the blue Steen Plan. Whilst the borough mainly has more minor ribbon networks. White & Sons watercourses these are still important and if Observation development complements and gives space to Agree – Propose Changes them they can restore the sense of place associated with the continuum of the water- space. page20 A place to belong- We support the provision of The support is welcomed. Mr Austin Mackie new housing and the enhancement of existing Austin Mackie Associates residential areas. Ltd Support Agree - No Action n/a We write on behalf of the BRB (Residuary) Ltd. The comment is noted. BRB (Residuary) Ltd owns land located at the BRB (Residuary) Ltd East Croydon Goods Yard, Lansdowne Road, Observation Croydon. The site is situated to the north west of Noted – No Action East Croydon Station and currently sits outside but close to the Metropolitan Centre Boundary as defined in the Croydon Replacement Unitary Development Plan 2006. page20/questionAO2 I am a young adult with learning disabilities and The objection is noted. The Mr Nafi Djemil am very disappointed to see that the disabled Core Strategy seeks to meet seem to have been ignored/forgotten as regards the needs of all residents of Object the provisional aims and objectives the borough and future drafts Noted – Propose Changes of the Core Strategy will include reference to the needs of the disabled residents of the borough.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission to the LGBCE: London Borough of Croydon by Chris Philp MP Member of Parliament for Croydon South Friday 28Th April 2017
    Submission to the LGBCE: London Borough of Croydon By Chris Philp MP Member of Parliament for Croydon South Friday 28th April 2017 I am responding to the LGBCE draft proposals for Warding patterns for the London Borough of Croydon published in 14th March 2017. I am writing in my capacity as Member of Parliament for Croydon South. In summary, I think that the LGBCE draft proposals do an excellent job of reflecting the natural communities of Croydon. The draft proposal also adhere strongly to the “Places” of Croydon, as defined by the Council themselves in a previous exercise. I would like to congratulate the LGBCE for the proposals that they have generated. Besides respecting the natural communities and “places” of Croydon, the proposals also respect hard boundaries (such as railway lines) where possible and minimise the splits to natural communities in the Borough. I would also like to emphasise the importance of maintaining Waddon as a three member Ward. It has been in this form since 1977, and has a community coherence as well as historical precedent to it. The more disadvantaged areas of the Waddon estate also benefit from the extra voice being part of a three member ward provides. Waddon as a three member ward is contained within string natural boundaries: the industrial areas to the north-west and west, and the town centre to the north-east. There are some minor modifications which would improve the LGBCE proposals even further, which I have summarised below: 1. Move some roads from Sanderstead to South Croydon The triangle of roads between Carlton Road, Selsdon Road and Essenden Road belong in the new South Croydon Ward not Sanderstead (as proposed).
    [Show full text]
  • To: Croydon Council Website Access Croydon & Town Hall
    LONDON BOROUGH OF CROYDON To: Croydon Council website Access Croydon & Town Hall Reception STATEMENT OF EXECUTIVE DECISIONS MADE BY THE CABINET MEMBER FOR HOMES REGENERATION AND PLANNING ON 8 FEBRUARY 2018 This statement is produced in accordance with Regulation 13 of the Local Authorities (Executive Arrangements) Meetings and Access to Information) (England) Regulations 2012. The following apply to the decisions listed below: Reasons for these decisions: are contained in the attached Part A report Other options considered and rejected: are contained in the attached Part A report Details of conflicts of Interest declared by the Cabinet Member: none Note of dispensation granted by the head of paid service in relation to a declared conflict of interest by that Member: none The Leader of the Council has delegated to the Cabinet Member the power to make the executive decision set out below: CABINET MEMBER’S DECISION REFERENCE NO. 0418HRP Decision title: Recommendation to Council to Adopt the Croydon Local Plan 2018 Having carefully read and considered the Part A report, including the requirements of the Council’s public sector equality duty in relation to the issues detailed in the body of the reports, the Deputy Leader (Statutory) and Cabinet Member for Homes Regeneration and Planning has RESOLVED under delegated authority (0418LR) the Deputy Leader (Statutory) and Cabinet Member for Homes, Regeneration and Planning to agree that the Croydon Local Plan 2018 be presented to Council with a recommendation to adopt it in accordance with s23(5)
    [Show full text]
  • BIKING BOROUGH STUDY LONDON BOROUGH of CROYDON Final
    BIKING BOROUGH STUDY LONDON BOROUGH OF CROYDON Final Report July 2010 BIKING BOROUGH STUDY LONDON BOROUGH OF CROYDO N Final Report July 2010 Project Code: CROY -BB Prepared by: DB, CC, MM, MS Position: Various Approved by: DB, CC, MM, MS Issue Date: 5 July 2010 Status: ISSUE Biking Borough Study London Borough of Croydon Contents 1.0 Cycling in Croydon ………………………………..page 07 2.0 Ward Analysis ……………………………………..page 27 3.0 Current Borough Initiatives ………………………page 45 4.0 Cycling Hub Analysis ……………………………..page 60 5.0 Initiatives …………………………………………...page 70 6.0 Funding …………………………………………….page 83 7.0 Evaluation ………………………………………….page 91 8.0 Recommendations ………………………………..page 99 List of Tables Table 1 Cycling in Croydon & London, 2005/08 Table 16 MOSAIC Driver Segmentation by ward location 2010 Table 2 Comparison of cycle trip lengths in Croydon & London, Table 17 Croydon demographic overview 2010 2005/08 Table 3 Cycling frequency in Croydon, 2005/08 Table 18 MOSAIC Groups 1 demographic by ward 2010 Table 4 Cycling frequency by age band in Croydon, 2005/08 Table 19 MOSAIC Groups 2 demographic by ward 2010 Table 5 Cycling frequency by gender in Croydon, 2005/08 Table 20 Infrastructure initiatives Table 6 Cycling frequency by ethnic group in Croydon, 2005/08 Table 21 Smarter Travel initiatives Table 7 Cycling frequency by income group in Croydon, 2005/08 Table 22 Partnership initiatives Table 8 TfL automatic cycle count sites Table 23 Political initiatives Table 9 Potential cycleable trips in Croydon Table 24 Alignment of Infrastructure initiatives
    [Show full text]
  • DELEGATED PLANNING DECISIONS (Ward Order)
    Appendix 2 - Decisions (Ward Order) since last Planning Control Meeting as at: 24th June 2019 Bernard Weatherill House 8 Mint Walk Croydon CR0 1EA DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT - PLACE DEPARTMENT DELEGATED PLANNING DECISIONS (Ward Order) The following is a list of planning applications determined by the Head of Development Management under delegated powers since the last meeting of the Planning Committee. Note: This list also includes those decisions made by Planning Committee and released in this time frame as shown within the level part of each case. NOTE: The cases listed in this report can be viewed on the Council’s Website. Please note that you can also view the information supplied within this list and see more details relating to each application (including the ability to view the drawings submitted and the decision notice) by visiting our Online Planning Service at the Croydon Council web site (www.croydon.gov.uk/onlineplans). Once on the Council web page please note the further information provided before selecting the Public Access Planning Register link. Once selected there will be various options to select the Registers of recently received or decided applications. Also; by entering a reference number if known you are able to ascertain details relating to a particular application. (Please remember to input the reference number in full by inserting any necessary /’s or 0’s) Ref. No. : 19/01717/FUL Ward : Addiscombe East Location : 19 Ashburton Road Type: Full planning permission Croydon CR0 6AP Proposal : Conversion of existing outbuilding into residential flat. Date Decision: 21.06.19 Permission Refused 1 Appendix 2 - Decisions (Ward Order) since last Planning Control Meeting as at: 24th June 2019 Level: Delegated Business Meeting Ref.
    [Show full text]