DOCSLIB.ORG

Legislative Transparency Toolkit Concepts, Tools, and Good Practices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Legislative Transparency Toolkit Concepts, Tools, and Good Practices Legislative Transparency Toolkit Concepts, Tools, and Good Practices An Initiative of EUROsociAL+, the Transparency and Access to Information Network, and ParlAmericas This publication has been developed with the technical and financial support of the European Union. Its content is the sole responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union. Additionally, this publication was made possible in part thanks to the generous support of the Government of Canada through Global Affairs Canada. Published in October 2020. TABLE OF CONTENTS Prologue ................................................................................................................................................................7 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................8 2. How to use this toolkit ........................................................................................................................................11 3. Methodology ......................................................................................................................................................12 4. Background on transparency and the right of access to public information .............................................................14 4.1 International sources: Freedom of expression and the right of access to public information ......................................................14 4.2 Basic principles ..........................................................................................................................................................................15 4.3 Active and passive transparency ................................................................................................................................................16 4.4 Associated concepts ...................................................................................................................................................................17 4.5 Transparency in the parliament .................................................................................................................................................18 5. Legislative transparency tools .............................................................................................................................20 5.1 Active transparency ....................................................................................................................................21 Concept ...........................................................................................................................................................................................21 Objective: What is the purpose of active transparency? ...................................................................................................................21 Attributes of information .................................................................................................................................................................22 Model for active transparency information ......................................................................................................................................23 Mainstreaming gender in active transparency .................................................................................................................................27 International good practices in active transparency ........................................................................................................................27 Compliance assessment systems - Management indicators .............................................................................................................33 5.2 Requests for access to public information .....................................................................................................35 Concept ...........................................................................................................................................................................................35 Objective: What is the purpose of access request mechanisms? .......................................................................................................35 Attributes of the process for access to information requests ............................................................................................................36 Model for processing access to information requests .......................................................................................................................38 Mainstreaming gender in the process for access to information requests .......................................................................................42 4 Legislative transparency toolkit | Concepts, tools, and good practices International good practices in the process for access to information requests ...............................................................................43 Compliance assessment systems - Management indicators .............................................................................................................46 5.3 Open data ..................................................................................................................................................48 Concept ...........................................................................................................................................................................................48 Objectives: What is the purpose of open data?.................................................................................................................................48 Open data principles ........................................................................................................................................................................49 Methodology for publishing open data in legislatures .....................................................................................................................50 International good practices in open data .......................................................................................................................................53 Compliance assessment systems - Management indicators .............................................................................................................56 5.4 Communication and accessibility .................................................................................................................58 Concept ...........................................................................................................................................................................................58 Objective: What is the purpose of communication and accessibility? ...............................................................................................58 Attributes of communication and accessibility ................................................................................................................................59 Communication and accessibility tools ............................................................................................................................................60 International good practices in communication and accessibility ....................................................................................................63 Compliance assessment systems - Management indicators .............................................................................................................66 5.5 Records management .................................................................................................................................67 Concept ...........................................................................................................................................................................................67 Objective: What is the purpose of records management? ................................................................................................................67 Attributes for records, document, and archive management ...........................................................................................................68 Records management in parliaments ..............................................................................................................................................69 International good practices in records management and archiving ...............................................................................................72 Compliance assessment systems - Management indicators .............................................................................................................77 Bibliography ..........................................................................................................................................................79 Legislative transparency toolkit | Concepts, tools, and good practices 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project is the result of a joint effort between EUROsociAL+ — the program for cooperation between the European Union and Latin America — and the institutions that are part of the Transparency and Access to Information Network (RTA) and ParlAmericas. We would like to highlight and acknowledge the contributions made by the member parliaments of ParlAmericas and the institutions that comprise
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The 1996 Institutional Crisis in Paraguay
    Democratic Forum The 1996 Institutional Crisis in Paraguay September 1996 Washington, D.C. Secretary General César Gaviria Assistant Secretary General Christopher R. Thomas Executive Coordinator, Unit for the Promotion of Democracy Elizabeth M. Spehar This publication is part of a series of publications of the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States (OAS). Opinions and statements expressed are not necessarily those of the OAS or its member states, and are entirely the responsibility of the parties expressing them. Democratic Forum The institutional crisis of April 22 to 24, 1996, in Paraguay, from the perspective of the Government, civil society, and the international community Unit for the Promotion of Democracy This report is an edited version of the original transcripts, produced under the technical supervision of Mr. Diego Paz, Senior Specialist of the UPD, and Coordinator of this Forum. Professor Riordan Roett contributed with the summary and comments included in this issue. Design and composition of this publication was done by the Information and Dialogue Section headed by Mr. John Murray of the UPD. Mrs. Betty Robinson and Mrs. Judith Horvath- Rouco helped with the final editing of this report, and JNA Design was responsible for the graphic design. Copyright @ 1997. All rights reserved. Reproduction of this material is authorized; please credit it as Aa publication of the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States@. Table of contents Preface..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Análisis Y Diseño
    The European Centre for Parliamentary Research and Documentation (ECPRD) Cortes Generales SEMINAR EUROPEAN CORTES GENERALES - CENTRE FOR PARLIAMENTARY RESEARCH AND DOCUMENTATION (ECPRD) INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY AREA OF INTEREST PARLIAMENTS ON THE NET X (Madrid, Palacio del Senado, 31st May – 1st June 2012) Mobility, Transparency and open parliament: best practices in Parliamentary web sites Agenda - Thursday, 31st May 9:00 - 10:00: Registration and Accreditation of Participants. (Entrance on Bailén Street). 10:00-10:30: Official opening of the Seminar. Welcome greetings - Statement by Rosa Ripolles, ECPRD correspondent at the Congress of Deputies - Statement by Ulrich Hüschen Co-Secretary ECPRD, European Parliament - Statement by Manuel Alba Navarro, Secretary General of the Congress of Deputies - Statement by Yolanda Vicente, Second Deputy Speaker of the Senate. Carlo Simonelli, ECPRD ICT Coordinator, Chamber of Deputies, Italy; Javier de Andrés, Director TIC, Congreso de los Diputados, España and José Ángel Alonso, Director TIC, Senado, España) take the Chair The European Centre for Parliamentary Research and Documentation (ECPRD) Cortes Generales 10:30 to 12:00 Morning session 1: presentations. • Questionnaire for the ECPRD Seminar 'Parliaments on the Net X'. Miguel Ángel Gonzalo. Webmaster, Congress of Deputies. Spain • Mobility and transparency: Current status in the Congress of Deputies. Open Parliament: some remarks. Javier de Andrés. ICT Director Congress of Deputies. Spain. • New web site and mobility experience in the Senate of Spain. José Ángel Alonso ICT Director and José Luis Martínez, Analist. Senate. Spain • Debate 12:00 to 12:15 Coffee Break 12:15-13:00: Morning session (2) • Knocking on the Parliament´s door Rafael Rubio.
    [Show full text]
  • Paraguay: in Brief
    Paraguay: In Brief June S. Beittel Analyst in Latin American Affairs August 31, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R44936 Paraguay: In Brief Summary Paraguay is a South American country wedged between Bolivia, Argentina, and Brazil. It is about the size of California but has a population of less than 7 million. The country is known for its rather homogenous culture—a mix of Latin and Guarani influences, with 90% of the population speaking Guarani, a pre-Columbian language, in addition to Spanish. The Paraguayan economy is one of the most agriculturally dependent in the hemisphere and is largely shaped by the country’s production of cattle, soybeans, and other crops. In 2016, Paraguay grew by 4.1%; it is projected to sustain about 4.3% growth in 2017. Since his election in 2013, President Horacio Cartes of the long-dominant Colorado Party (also known as the Asociación Nacional Republicana [ANC]), has moved the country toward a more open economy, deepening private investment and increasing public-private partnerships to promote growth. Despite steady growth, Paraguay has a high degree of inequality and, although poverty levels have declined, rural poverty is severe and widespread. Following Paraguay’s 35-year military dictatorship in the 20th century (1954-1989), many citizens remain cautious about the nation’s democracy and fearful of a return of patronage and corruption. In March 2016, a legislative initiative to allow a referendum to reelect President Cartes (reelection is forbidden by the 1992 constitution) sparked large protests. Paraguayans rioted, and the parliament building in the capital city of Asunción was partially burned.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Transparency Toolkit Concepts, Tools, and Good Practices
    Legislative Transparency Toolkit Concepts, Tools, and Good Practices An Initiative of EUROsociAL+, the Transparency and Access to Information Network, and ParlAmericas This publication has been developed with the technical and financial support of the European Union. Its content is the sole responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union. Additionally, this publication was made possible in part thanks to the generous support of the Government of Canada through Global Affairs Canada. Published in October 2020. TABLE OF CONTENTS Prologue ................................................................................................................................................................7 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................8 2. How to use this toolkit ........................................................................................................................................11 3. Methodology ......................................................................................................................................................12 4. Background on transparency and the right of access to public information .............................................................14 4.1 International sources: Freedom of expression and the right of access to public information ......................................................14 4.2 Basic principles
    [Show full text]
  • Sixth IPU Global Conference of Young Parliamentarians
    Sixth IPU Global Conference of Young Parliamentarians 9 and 10 September 2019, Asunción (Paraguay) Information note BACKGROUND The IPU Global Conference of Young Parliamentarians has been taking place annually since 2014. It brings together hundreds of young men and women parliamentarians to empower them, help them build solidarity and networks, and promote a youth-coordinated approach to issues of common interest. The conferences have addressed political participation and democracy (Geneva, 2014), peace and prosperity (Tokyo, 2015), the Sustainable Development Goals (Lusaka, 2016), political, social and economic inclusion (Ottawa, 2017), and the rights of future generations (Baku, 2018). The conferences are youth-led in their conceptualization, implementation and outcomes. VENUE AND DATE The Sixth IPU Global Conference of Young Parliamentarians will take place on 9 and 10 September 2019 at the Congress of Paraguay, Asunción, Paraguay. PARTICIPATION The Conference is open to young members of national parliaments under 45 years of age. Parliaments are invited to send a gender-balanced delegation of a maximum of four members, and are encouraged to include their youngest members in their delegation. Parliamentary staff members may also attend. IPU Associate Members and Observers that work on youth-related matters are also invited to take part in the Conference, as are international and regional youth associations, organizations and parliaments. The IPU and the Congress of Paraguay will also invite a selected group of senior politicians and experts to contribute to the discussions and take part in the debates. ORGANIZATION OF PROCEEDINGS In keeping with standard IPU practice, all delegates will have equal speaking rights. In order to ensure that the discussions are as vibrant and dynamic as possible, the following rules will apply: There will be no list of speakers on any agenda item.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hon. Edward Seaga, Prime Minister of Jamaica
    r-J _ 4rofi/e _ \-\.on . \,.-. �e�o.._ ) National Library of Jamaica The Hon. Edward Seaga ' Prime Minister of Jamaica Edward Phillip George Seaga was elected Prime Minister of Jamaica on October 30, 1980. He led the Opposition Jamaica Labour Party, of which he had been elected Leader in 1974, to a massive landslide victory over the ruling People's National Party, at General Elections on that day. Edward Seaga, born on May 28, 1930,jl; a graduate of Harvard University (B.A. 1952),......­ He was Leader of the Parliamentary Opposi­ tion in the House of Representatives from 1974:.)-'ntil the October 30 General Elections. Prime Minister Seaga has served continuously as Member of Parliament for Western Kingston for the past 18 years,:,-' and has held the posts of Minister of Finance and Planning (1967-1972) and Minister of Development and Welfare '(1 962-1967) in Jamaica Labour Party ...- governments, be{ween 1962 and 1972 r ,; ,; As a member of the Cabinet, Mr. Seaga was responsible for developing a comprehensive range of financial institutions to make Jamaica's Capital Market network a model for developing countries. These include the: ' Jamaica Stock Exchange Jamaica Development Bank Jamaica Mortgage Bank Jamaica Unit Trust introduction of Merchant Ba11king. He also represented Jamaica as: Governor of the World Bank Governor International Monetary Fund Governor Inter-American Development Bank Governor Caribbean Development Bank Representative on the Council of the University of the West Indies, BEGINNING OF POLITICAL CAREER Edward Seaga's political career began in 1959, when the Founder and President of the Jamaica Labour Party, Sir Alexander Bustamante, invited him to serve in the Upper House of the Jamaican Legislature.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Scrutiny Unit
    TH FIRST SESSION OF THE 12 PARLIAMENT FINANCIAL SCRUTINY UNIT OFFICE OF THE PARLIAMENT OF TRINIDAD & TOBAGO OFFICE OF THE HEAD 05: PARLIAMENT Total Allocation - $ 151,696,660.00 0.25% of the National Budget Summary of the Parliament’s Expenditure, Departments, Programmes and Projects. 1 Publication An electronic copy of this Guide can be found on the Parliament website: www.ttparliament.org All correspondence should be addressed to: The Secretary Standing Finance Committee Office of the Parliament Parliamentary Complex Cabildo Building St. Vincent Street Port of Spain Republic of Trinidad and Tobago Tel: (868) 624-7275; Fax: (868) 625-4672 Email: [email protected] 2 Table of Contents About this Guide .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Head 05: Office of the Parliament .................................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Office Overview ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Mission......................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 00-190 Eng Briefing Notes Jan
    ETA violence and the Basque Country: Does federalism offer a solution? BY GURUTZ JAUREGUI The Spanish system of regional and federal models of government. The problem of territory autonomies has had very positive effects Its complex and ambiguous nature is a The Basque region is located for the Basque Country. The progress constant source of clashes between the geographically in Spanish and French made over the years in the recovery of federal and community governments. territory. Traditionally, the strategic Basque identity has been very significant. Rather than a list of powers, the aspiration of Basque nationalism has The system, however, has been unable to Constitution establishes a distribution of been to establish an independent State solve the ‘Basque problem’. The conflict functions. In many areas, the Constitution that covers the whole territory. between Basque separatists and Spain qualifies the functions of the autonomous has left hundreds dead, and has caused Not only is the division between France regions with phrases such as ‘in the untold suffering. and Spain a contentious issue, but frame of’ or ‘according to’ (other there are also problems regarding the Today’s conflicts between the Basque authorities). The upshot is that the federal territorial boundaries of the Basque region and the Spanish government are government has established regulations, region inside Spain. chiefly, although not exclusively, based on directives and controls that have led to a three aspects: distribution of powers, terri- real reduction in the powers of the The Autonomy Statute identifies the tory, and the right to self-determination. autonomous regions. provinces of Alava, Guipuzcoa and Vizcaya as comprising the Basque region, The regions have very few possibilities and also mentions Navarra, giving it the Distribution of powers for participating in overall federal choice of joining this region.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Parliamentary Documents and Data: Challenge to Improve Transparency in the Parliamentary Information Context
    Managing Parliamentary documents and data: challenge to improve transparency in the parliamentary information context Marina Cueto Document Management Department Directorate of Technical Parliamentary Assistance Senate of Spain [email protected] The presentation contents: I. Document Management Department functions II. Official publications: from digitisation to Dublin Core III. Open data: Ballots in plenary sittings IV. Conclusions I. About Document Management Department functions Functions • Definition, planning and integrated management of parliamentary documentation • Providing access to all parliamentary information for citizens and other organizations through the website • Coordination of the thesaurus used by all the units (Directorate of Documentation) (topics) • Parliamentary initiatives and records at the core (Archive) • Videos, official publications, documents management Interconnection of both Houses through parliamentary information • The Spanish Parliament is composed of two Chambers: the Congress of Deputies and the Senate and the information is in both webpages. • The Senate’s website tries to make more familiar the approval of bills to the citizen bringing the corresponding data referred to the passing of bills from the Congress of Deputies, to complete the specific information about the Senate’s law-making process. e.g.: Shared data of both Houses to explain the adoption of the bill: III. Official publications: from digitisation to Dublin Core • Same structure maintained from 1977 to 2016: Official Bulletin and
    [Show full text]
  • Bicameral Systems and Representation of Regions and Local Authorities: the Role of Second Chambers in Europe”
    CONFERENCE ON “BICAMERAL SYSTEMS AND REPRESENTATION OF REGIONS AND LOCAL AUTHORITIES: THE ROLE OF SECOND CHAMBERS IN EUROPE” Paris, 21 February 2008 organised by THE FRENCH SENATE THE CONGRESS OF LOCAL AND REGIONAL AUTHORITIES OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE in co-operation with THE PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE AND THE VENICE COMMISSION REPORT FORMS OF REPRESENTATION IN SECOND CHAMBERS: ELECTION PROCEDURES BY Mr Carlos CLOSA MONTERO (member of the European Commission for democracy through law - Venice Commission -, Spain) 1. The position of second chambers in european constitutional design: at some time during the 20th century, the use of second chambers seemed to be condemned to a corner of history, since several european countries eliminated them during the first third of the xxth century (Serbia 1901-1903; 1917 Russia; 1917 Finland; 1926 Portugal; 1928 Albania; 1949 Malta; 1982 Turkey). However, drafters of new constitutions after 1945 have shown themselves kin on having second chambers, a path continued also at the end of the xxth century in new constitutions. Thus, rather than being an extraordinary feature of european political system, it has become a common one: not least than 17 european states have second chambers.1 There is a certain correspondence between the size of states and having a second chamber: generally speaking, large countries do tend to have second chambers. In Europe, the largest countries to have a unicameral parliament are Greece, with 11 million inhabitants, and Portugal, with 10.5 million. Despite this trend, second chambers are disputed. Usually, their operative costs and the delays in passing legislation are arguments used against them.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Corruption and Legislative Procedures: Is One Chamber Better Than Two?
    Government Corruption and Legislative Procedures: is One Chamber Better than Two? by Cecilia Testa Royal Holloway College, University of London and STICERD, London School of Economics and Politcal Science The Suntory Centre Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines London School of Economics and Political Science Houghton Street DEDPS 41 London WC2A 2AE November 2003 Tel: (020) 7955 6674 * I am indebted to Timothy Besley for his dedicated supervision. I also wish to thank Oriana Bandiera, Heski Bar-Isaac, Michela Cella, Anna Creti, Gilat Levy, Torsten Persson, Michele Piccione, Andrea Prat, Barbara Veronese, and all the participants to the EOPP/STICERD internal seminar, the PET (Warwick 2000), The Royal Economic Society Conference (University of St. Andrews 2000), The World Congress of the Econometric Society (Seattle 2000) the LACEA ( Rio de Janeiro 2000), and the SITE summer workshop (Stanford 2001) for helpful comments and suggestions. All remaining errors are mine. Development Economics Discussion Paper Series This series is published by the Economic Organisation and Public Policy Programme (EOPP) located within the Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines (STICERD) at the London School of Economics and Political Science. The programme was established in October 1998 as a successor to the Development Economics Research Programme. The work of the programme is mainly in the fields of development economics, public economics and political economy. It is directed by Tim Besley, Oriana Bandiera, Robin Burgess, Maitreesh Ghatak and Andrea Prat. Further details about the programme and its work can be viewed on our web site at http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/research/eopp.
    [Show full text]
  • Theparliamentarian
    TheParliamentarian Journal of the Parliaments of the Commonwealth 2015 | Issue Three XCVI | Price £13 Elections and Voting Reform PLUS Commonwealth Combatting Looking ahead to Millenium Development Electoral Networks by Terrorism in Nigeria CHOGM 2015 in Malta Goals Update: The fight the Commonwealth against TB Secretary-General PAGE 150 PAGE 200 PAGE 204 PAGE 206 The Commonwealth Parliamentary Association (CPA) Shop CPA business card holders CPA ties CPA souvenirs are available for sale to Members and officials of CPA cufflinks Commonwealth Parliaments and Legislatures by CPA silver-plated contacting the photoframe CPA Secretariat by email: [email protected] or by post: CPA Secretariat, Suite 700, 7 Millbank, London SW1P 3JA, United Kingdom. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE The Commonwealth Parliamentary Association (CPA) exists to connect, develop, promote and support Parliamentarians and their staff to identify benchmarks of good governance and implement the enduring values of the Commonwealth. Calendar of Forthcoming Events Confirmed at 24 August 2015 2015 September 2-5 September CPA and State University of New York (SUNY) Workshop for Constituency Development Funds – London, UK 9-12 September Asia Regional Association of Public Accounts Committees (ARAPAC) Annual Meeting - Kathmandu, Nepal 14-16 September Annual Forum of the CTO/ICTs and The Parliamentarian - Nairobi, Kenya 28 Sept to 3 October West Africa Association of Public Accounts Committees (WAAPAC) Annual Meeting and Community of Clerks Training - Lomé, Togo 30 Sept to 5 October CPA International
    [Show full text]