DOCSLIB.ORG

Arizona Geological Survey Special Paper 11, 70 P., 2 Map Plates - 1:60,000 Scale, 10 Appendices, GIS Data

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arizona Geological Survey Special Paper 11, 70 P., 2 Map Plates - 1:60,000 Scale, 10 Appendices, GIS Data Subsurface Hydrogeologic Investigation of the Superstition Vistas Planning Area, Maricopa and Pinal Counties, Arizona Authors Gootee, B.F.; Cook, J.P.; Young, J.J.; Pearthree, P.A. Citation Gootee, B.F., Cook, J.P., Young, J.J. and Pearthree, P.A., 2017, Subsurface hydrogeologic investigation of the Superstition Vistas Planning Area, Maricopa and Pinal Counties, Arizona. Arizona Geological Survey Special Paper 11, 70 p., 2 Map Plates - 1:60,000 scale, 10 appendices, GIS data. Rights Arizona Geological Survey. All rights reserved. Download date 30/09/2021 00:04:36 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/630077 Subsurface Hydrogeologic Investigation of the Superstition Vistas Planning Area, Maricopa and Pinal Counties, Arizona Brian F. Gootee, Joseph P. Cook, Jeri J. Young and Phil A. Pearthree Arizona Geological Survey SPECIAL PAPER 11 July 2017 Arizona Geological Survey azgs.arizona.edu | repository.azgs.az.gov Arizona Geological Survey P.A. Pearthree, State Geologist and Director Manuscript approved for publication in July 2017 Printed by the Arizona Geological Survey All rights reserved For an electronic copy of this publication: www.repository.azgs.az.gov For information on the mission, objectives or geologic products of the Arizona Geological Survey visit azgs.arizona.edu. This publication was prepared by the Arizona Geological Survey at the University of Arizona. The University of Arizona, or any department thereof, or any of their employees, makes no warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or pro- cess disclosed in this report. Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the University of Arizona. ___________________________ Recommended Citation: Gootee, B.F., Cook, J.P., Young, J.A. and Pearthree, P.A., 2017, Subsurface hydrogeologic investigation of the Superstition Vistas Planning Area, Maricopa and Pinal Counties, Arizona. Arizona Geological Survey Special Paper 11, 70 p., 2 Map Plates - 1:60,000 scale, 10 appendices, GIS data. Subsurface Hydrogeologic Investigation of the Superstition Vistas Planning Area, Maricopa and Pinal Counties, Arizona Drilling operations at Exploratory Boring A2. View to north with Superstition Mountains in background. July, 2017 Brian F. Gootee Joe Cook Jeri J. Young Phil A. Pearthree Arizona Geological Survey University of Arizona 1955 East Sixth Street, P.O. Box 210284 Tucson, Arizona 85721 520-621-2470, azgs.arizona.edu Table of Contents List of Tables ............................................................................................................... iii List of Figures ............................................................................................................. iii List of Plates ................................................................................................................ iii List of Appendices (USB Flash Drive only) .............................................................. iv USB Flash Drive Contents................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................... v Acknowledgements ................................................................................................... vii 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Borehole Data and Analysis ................................................................................ 3 2.1 Site Evaluation and Selection ................................................................................................ 3 2.2 Sample Collection and Analytical Methods ............................................................................ 3 2.2.1 Lithology Analysis ........................................................................................................... 3 2.2.2 Mineral Analysis .............................................................................................................. 4 2.2.3 Sieve Analysis ................................................................................................................. 4 2.3 Borehole Geophysics ............................................................................................................. 4 2.4 Designation of Hydrogeologic Units ....................................................................................... 5 2.5 Summary of Borehole Analyses ............................................................................................. 5 2.5.1 Exploration Borehole A1 ................................................................................................. 5 2.5.2 Exploration Borehole A2 ................................................................................................. 6 2.5.3 Exploration Borehole C1 ................................................................................................. 7 2.5.4 Exploration Borehole C3a1 ............................................................................................. 9 2.5.5 Exploration Borehole A3a ............................................................................................. 10 2.5.6 Test Well B2a ................................................................................................................ 11 3.0 Vintage Seismic Reflection Data and Analysis ................................................ 12 3.1 Site Evaluation and Selection .............................................................................................. 12 3.2 Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 12 3.3 Findings and Interpretations ................................................................................................. 13 4.0 Subsurface Hydrogeologic Analysis ................................................................ 14 4.1 Approach and Methods ........................................................................................................ 14 4.2 Hydrogeologic Cross-Sections ............................................................................................. 15 4.3 Geologic Setting and Structure ............................................................................................ 15 Subsurface Hydrogeologic Investigation SVPA Page i of vii 4.3.1 Mid-Tertiary sequence................................................................................................. 15 4.3.2 Basin-fill sequence ...................................................................................................... 16 4.3.2.1 Lower Alluvial Unit and Bedrock ......................................................................... 17 4.3.2.2 Middle Alluvial Unit .............................................................................................. 20 4.3.2.3 Upper Alluvial Unit and Queen Creek ................................................................. 21 4.4 Basin-fill Facies and extent of interbedded basalts .............................................................. 23 5.0 Aquifer Test and Water Quality Analysis .......................................................... 26 5.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 26 5.2 Aquifer Testing and Water Quality Sampling Summary ....................................................... 26 5.2.1 ASLD Well ................................................................................................................. 26 5.2.2 AWC Wells ................................................................................................................ 26 5.2.3 Test Well B2a ............................................................................................................ 27 5.3 Discussion ............................................................................................................................ 28 5.3.1 Three Aquifer Test Results ....................................................................................... 28 5.3.2 Transmissivity Distribution in the Study Area and Vicinity ........................................ 29 5.3.2.1 Transmissivity Trends North of Queen Creek Wash .......................................... 29 5.3.2.2 Transmissivity Trends South of Queen Creek Wash .......................................... 30 5.3.3 Water Quality Sampling Results ............................................................................... 30 6.0 Recommendations for Additional Investigation .............................................. 32 7.0 References Cited ................................................................................................ 33 Subsurface Hydrogeologic Investigation SVPA Page ii of vii List of Tables Table 1. Well site selection and location for exploratory borings. Table 2. Sample repositories for SVPA boreholes. Table 3. Hydrogeologic units in SVPA. Table 4. Summary of hydrogeologic boundaries determined from boring and well analyses. Table 5. Summary of observations and interpretations from vintage seismic data. Table 6. Summary of Phase II Aquifer Test Results: Well Pertinent Data and Transmissivity. Table 7. Summary of Groundwater Quality, Superstition Vistas. List of Figures
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Grades FINAL.Xlsx
    School Name Letter Grade Round Valley Primary School * Cordova Primary School * Mesa Transitional Learning Center * Deer Valley Academy * Humanities and Sciences Academy Arizona * Peoria eCampus * Valle Del Encanto Learning Center * Buckeye Primary * Southwest Key Transitional Learning Center * Chandler Online Academy * ASU Preparatory Academy- Phoenix High School * ASU Preparatory Academy-Polytechnic Elementary * Coronado Elementary School A Benson Primary School A Charles W Sechrist Elementary School A Flagstaff High School A Flagstaff Arts And Leadership Academy A Mountain School A Northland Preparatory Academy A Payson High School A Triumphant Learning Center A Franklin Elementary School A Franklin West Elementary A Hale Elementary School A Pomeroy Elementary School A Johnson Elementary School A O'Connor Elementary School A Ishikawa Elementary School A Sousa Elementary School A Hermosa Vista Elementary School A Falcon Hill Elementary School A Bush Elementary A Las Sendas Elementary School A Franklin Northeast School A Poston Junior High School A Shepherd Junior High School A Mountain View High School A Red Mountain High School A Kachina Elementary School A Oakwood Elementary School A Marshall Ranch Elementary School A Santa Fe Elementary School A Paseo Verde Elementary School A Desert Harbor Elementary School A Sunrise Mountain High School A Patterson Elementary School A Neely Traditional Academy A Pioneer Elementary School A Burk Elementary School A Val Vista Lakes Elementary School A Playa del Rey Elementary School A Sonoma Ranch
    [Show full text]
  • Nickerson Et Al:Layout 1
    © 2010 Society of Economic Geologists, Inc. Special Publication 15, pp. 299–316 Chapter 17 Characterization and Reconstruction of Multiple Copper-Bearing Hydrothermal Systems in the Tea Cup Porphyry System, Pinal County, Arizona PHILLIP A. NICKERSON,† MARK D. BARTON, AND ERIC SEEDORFF Institute for Mineral Resources, Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, 1040 East Fourth Street, Tucson, Arizona 85721-0077 Abstract This study exploits a cross-sectional view of the Laramide magmatic arc in the northern Tortilla Mountains, central Arizona, that was created by tilting during severe Tertiary extension of the Basin and Range province. Building upon earlier work, we combine the results of geologic mapping of rock types, structures, and hydrothermal alteration styles, with a palinspastic reconstruction, to provide a system-wide understanding of the evolution of the composite magmatic and hydrothermal Tea Cup porphyry system. Geologic mapping revealed the presence of at least three, and possibly four, mineralizing hydrothermal sys- tems in the study area that are associated with widespread potassic, sericitic, greisen, sodic (-calcic), and propy- litic alteration. The alteration envelops both porphyry copper and porphyry molybdenum (-copper) mineral- ization. Two areas flanking compositionally distinct units of the composite Tea Cup pluton are characterized by intense potassic and sericitic alteration. Intense alteration and mineralization akin to iron oxide-copper-gold systems was recognized in several areas. The U-Pb dating of zircons from porphyry dikes suggests that hydrothermal activity in the study area was short lived (~73−72 Ma). Subsequently, between ~25 and 15 Ma, the Tea Cup porphyry system was tilted ~90° to the east and extended by >200 percent due to movement on five superimposed sets of nearly planar normal faults.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Guide for a Transect from Florence to Miami, Arizona April 20
    Field Guide for a Transect from Florence to Miami, Arizona Compiled by Stephen M. Richard Guidebook for the Arizona Geological Society Spring Field Trip April 20-21, 1996 Arizona Geological Society P.O. Box 40952 Tucson, AZ 85717 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION........ ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 ROAD LOG •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.•••••••••••••••.••••••••••••..•••..•.•••••••••••.••...•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.••••••• 2 DAY ONE.......................................................... ................................................................................................................ 2 DAY ............................................................................. .......................................... ...... ....... ........ ......................... 7 Two GEOLOGIC BACKGROUND FOR STOPS.................................................... ................................................................ 9 STOP 1. GEOLOGY PROJECT OVERVIEW OF BHPFLORENCE (POSTONBU1TE) PORPHYRY COPPER DEPOSIT, PINAL AND COUNTY, ARIzONA. By C. K. HOAG ... ...........................THE . ... ....................... ........ ........ ...... ................................ 9 STOPS 2 AND 3. OVERVIEW OF SUPERSTITION MOUNTAINS ANDWHITLOW CANYON AREA. BY CHARLES A. FERGUSON ...... 17 STOP 4. NORMAL FAULTING IN WHITFORD CANYON AREA, NORTHWEST
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis and Dissertation Index of Arizona Geology to December 1979
    Arizona Geological Society Digest, Volume XII, 1980 261 Thesis and Dissertation Index of Arizona Geology to December 1979 From The University of Arizona, Arizona State University, and Northern Arizona University compiled by 1 Gregory R. Wessel Introduction This list is a compilation of all graduate theses and dissertations completed at The University of Arizona, Arizona State University, and Northern Arizona University concerning the geology of Arizona. The list is complete through December 1979. To facilitate the use of this list as a reference, papers are arranged alphabetically into five sec­ tions on the basis of study area. Four sections cover the four quadrants of the state of Arizona us­ ing the Gila and Salt River Meridian and Base Line (Fig. 1), and the fifth section contains theses that pertain to the entire state. A thesis or dissertation that includes work in two quadrants is listed under both sections. Those covering subjects or areas outside of the geology of Arizona are omitted. This list was compiled from tabulations of geology theses graciously supplied by each university. Although care was taken to include all theses, some may have been inadvertently overlooked. It is hoped that readers will report any omissions so they may be included in Digest XIII. Digest XIII will contain an update of work 114 113 112 III 110 I 9 completed at Arizona universities, as well as a 37 list of theses and dissertations on Arizona geol­ ogy completed at universities outside of the state. Grateful acknowledgment is made of the assist­ 36 ance of Tom L. Heidrick, who inspired the pro- N£ ject and who, with Joe Wilkins, Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Mineral Resource Information for the Luke Air Force Range Arizona
    Status of Mineral Resource Information for The Luke Air Force Range Arizona Glenn A. Miller Field Engineer John H. Jett Director Department of Mineral Resources Mineral Building - Fairgrounds Phoenix, Arizona 85007 July, 1979 LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES TABLE Page I. PRODUCTION DATA FOR ARIZONA'S MAJOR COPPER PRODUCERS WHICH LIE IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO LUKE AIR FORCE RANGE ........................................ 5 11. PROVEN COPPER RESERVES IN ARIZONA ........................... 8 111. DISCOVERY AND PRODUCTION DATA FOR ARIZONA METAL MINES ............................................... 13 IV. NEW METAL MINES DISCOVERED IN THE SAME GEOLOGICAL PROVINCE AS THE LUKE AIR FORCE RANGE ................................................ 14 V. TEMPERATURE AND MOISTURE READINGS TINAJAS ALTAS MOUNTAINS 1905 ................................ 21 VI. MEAN MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM TEMPERATURES AND ANNUAL MEAN PRECIPITATION FOR SEVERAL ARIZONA TOWNS ...................................... 24 VII. PRODUCTION LA FORTUNA MINE .................................. 40 VIII. MINES, PROSPECTS OR CLAIM GROUPS IN THE FORTUNA MINING DISTRICT WITH NO INFORMATION OTHER THAN A NAME ........................................... 43 IX. UNNAMED MINES AND PROSPECTS IN THE FORTUNA MINING DISTRICT ..................................... 44 X. MINES, PROSPECTS OR CLAIM GROUPS IN THE LA POSA (WELLTON) DISTRICT WITH NO INFORMATION OTHER THAN A NAME ............................... 57 XI. UNNAMED MINES AND PROSPECTS IN THE LA POSA (WELLTON) DISTRICT .................................. 61 XII.
    [Show full text]
  • Bedrock Geology of the Santan Mountains, Pinal and Maricopa
    BEDROCK GEOLOGY OF THE SANTAN MOUNTAINS,PINAL AND MARICOPA COUNTIES, ARIZONA by Charles A. Ferguson, and Steven J. Skotnicki Arizona Geological Survey Open-File Report 96-9 June 1996 Arizona Geological Survey 416 W. Congress, Suite #100, Tucson, Arizona 85701 Includes 1:24,000 scale geologic map, cross-sections (2 sheets), and 22 page text Jointly funded by the Arizona Geological Survey and the u.S. Geological Survey STATEMAP Program Contract#1434-95-A-1353 This report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for conformity with Arizona Geological Survey standardS 2 INTRODUCTION The Santan Mountains are a 25 Ian long, west-northwest trending uplift composed chiefly of Proterozoic and Cretaceous crystalline rocks overlain in the central and eastern part of the range by Mid-Tertiary sedimentary and volcanic rocks. Santan Mountain at an elevation of 3010 feet is the range's highest point, rising nearly 1700 feet above the basin floor. Elevations decrease rapidly to the southeast towards the Gila River. The eastern two thirds of the range are composed of low hills connected by extensive areas of pedimented bedrock where relief is rarely greater than 400 feet. The range is bounded to the north by the Higley basin, and no extensive, pedimented bedrock surfaces exist here. Instead, abrupt thickening of the basin fill is suggested by the numerous earth fissures along the range's north edge (Harris, 1994; Sank, 1975). To the south, like the east, an extensive dissected granitic pediment extends all the way to the Gila river. Extensive pediments in the Sacaton Mountains to the southwest also probably extend northward to the Gila River, suggesting that the low area between the two ranges was created more by erosional processes than by tectonic processes.
    [Show full text]
  • School Districts
    Estimated Funding by School District and Individual School under SB 1101 JLBC Staff 4/3/2019 Notes: 1. Estimates are approximate and depict what formula costs would have been for FY 2019 if the bill had been in effect for that year. Estimates would be approximately 4.9% higher annually for FY 2020 and FY 2021 due to "base level" increases required for those years for additional teacher pay raises and inflation under the Basic State Aid (BSA) funding formula for public schools. 2. Estimates are based on current Arizona Department of Education data for Free or Reduced Price Lunch (FRPL) eligiblity, Average Daily Membership (ADM), and BSA formula costs. 3. School district subtotals are bolded. 4. Charter school estimates appear starting on page 32. 5. Grand total estimates appear on page 41. School Districts Calculated FRPL Opportunity Estimated School District School Name % Index Funding Agua Fria Union High School District Agua Fria High School 57 0.0001 5,800 Agua Fria Union High School District Canyon View High School 30 0.0000 0 Agua Fria Union High School District Desert Edge High School 45 0.0000 0 Agua Fria Union High School District Millennium High School 25 0.0000 0 Agua Fria Union High School District Verrado High School 23 0.0000 0 Agua Fria Union High School District Total 5,800 Aguila Elementary District Aguila Elementary School 96 0.0236 22,100 Aguila Elementary District Total 22,100 Ajo Unified District Ajo Elementary School 82 0.0106 29,500 Ajo Unified District Ajo High School 77 0.0038 10,600 Ajo Unified District Total 40,100 Alhambra Elementary District Alhambra Traditional School 64 0.0003 18,700 Alhambra Elementary District Barcelona Elementary School 87 0.0017 107,600 Alhambra Elementary District Carol G.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department Of. the Interior Geological
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF. THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Map, description and bibliography of the Mineralized Areas of the Basin and Range Province in Arizona By Stanley B. Keith 1 Lorraine Schnabel 2 , Ed DeWitt 2 Don E. Gest 3 . and Jan Wilt* Open-File Report 84-0086 1983 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. Arizona Bureau of Geology and Mineral Technology; present address: MAGMACHEM Assoc., 5114 E. Tunder Dr., Phoenix, Arizona 85044 2U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado 80225 Arizona Bureau of Geology and Mineral Technology, 845 N. Park Avenue, Tucson, Arizona 85719 ^J.C. Wilt and Co., 3035 So. Shiela Ave., Tucson, Arizona 85746 Contents Page Introduction..............................................................1 Classification and nomenclature of the Mineralized Areas..................! Commodities and deposit descriptions......................................2 Sources of information....................................................2 Acknowledgements..........................................................2 References cited..........................................................5 Bibliography.............................................................47 Illustrations Plate 1. Map of the Mineralized Areas of the Basin and Range Province in Arizona..............................................in pocket Tables Table 1. Summary of deposit types of the Basin and Range Province in Arizona......................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • List of Schools and CTDS
    CTDS SCHOOL NAME DISTRICT OR CHARTER HOLDER 108731101 A CHILD'S VIEW SCHOOL-CLOSED UNAVAILABLE 120201114 A J MITCHELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NOGALES UNIFIED DISTRICT 100206038 A. C. E. MARANA UNIFIED DISTRICT 118720001 A+ CHARTER SCHOOLS A+ CHARTER SCHOOLS 078707202 AAEC - PARADISE VALLEY ARIZONA AGRIBUSINESS & EQUINE CENTER, INC. 078993201 AAEC - SMCC CAMPUS ARIZONA AGRIBUSINESS & EQUINE CENTER, INC. 130201016 ABIA JUDD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PRESCOTT UNIFIED DISTRICT 078689101 ABRAHAM LINCOLN PREPARATORY SCHOOL: A CHALLENGE FOUNDATION ACADEMY UNAVAILABLE 070406167 ABRAHAM LINCOLN TRADITIONAL SCHOOL WASHINGTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT 100220119 ACACIA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL VAIL UNIFIED DISTRICT 070406114 ACACIA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL WASHINGTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT 108506101 ACADEMY ADVENTURES MIDTOWN ED AHEAD 108717103 ACADEMY ADVENTURES MID-TOWN EDUCATIONAL IMPACT, INC. 108717101 ACADEMY ADVENTURES PRIMARY SCHOOL EDUCATIONAL IMPACT, INC. 108734001 ACADEMY DEL SOL ACADEMY DEL SOL, INC. 108734002 ACADEMY DEL SOL - HOPE ACADEMY DEL SOL, INC. 088704201 ACADEMY OF BUILDING INDUSTRIES ACADEMY OF BUILDING INDUSTRIES, INC. 078604101 ACADEMY OF EXCELLENCE UNAVAILABLE 078604004 ACADEMY OF EXCELLENCE - CENTRAL ARIZONA-CLOSED UNAVAILABLE 108713101 ACADEMY OF MATH AND SCIENCE ACADEMY OF MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE, INC. 078242005 ACADEMY OF MATH AND SCIENCE AVONDALE ACADEMY OF MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE SOUTH, INC. 078270001 ACADEMY OF MATH AND SCIENCE CAMELBACK ACADEMY OF MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE, INC. 078242002 ACADEMY OF MATH AND SCIENCE DESERT SKY ACADEMY OF MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE SOUTH, INC. 078242004 ACADEMY OF MATH AND SCIENCE GLENDALE ACADEMY OF MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE SOUTH, INC. 078242003 ACADEMY OF MATH AND SCIENCE PEORIA ADVANCED ACADEMY OF MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE SOUTH, INC. 078242006 ACADEMY OF MATH AND SCIENCE SOUTH MOUNTAIN ACADEMY OF MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE SOUTH, INC. 078242001 ACADEMY OF MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE SOUTH ACADEMY OF MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE SOUTH, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooler Temps and Fall Events Ahead on the COVER
    Cooler Temps And Fall Events Ahead ON THE COVER PHOTO BY BOB BROWN, MEDIA DIRECTION Hop On Board BY CAROL L. ALLEN Finally cool weather is ahead and along with that are some great autumn events. Now is the transition time to fall and winter outdoor activities, includ- ing all that is available on local deserts, mountains, rivers and lakes. And, for women especially, the how to get the most out of the myriad of out- door activities in the Southwest, is what “Becoming an Outdoors Woman” is all about. It’s coming up soon — Fri- day, Saturday, Sunday, Sept. 6-8 — at Sand-Water-RV Expo Friendly Pines Camp near Prescott. Sponsored by the Arizona Wildlife Fed- Outdoor Recreation, Motorsports Take Center Stage eration in partnership with the Arizona Game & Fish Department, this is a won- derful learning opportunity supplement- Annual attraction set ed by fun and entertainment. to kick-off fall outdoor COVER, continued on page 14 recreation season, Nov. 16-17 at Lake Havasu. PORTS With cooler Arizona temperatures on the way in a couple of months, recreation 2 enthusiasts begin the seasonal transition DOWNSTREAM to fall and winter outdoor activities like Cruise through some of the camping, fishing, travel and off-roading. upcoming events in the Southwest. This means Southwest residents and va- cationing visitors alike are anxiously awaiting the opportunity to enjoy every- thing that local deserts, mountains, rivers 4 and lakes have to offer. BOATING Renewing your registration EXPO, continued on page 17 is now mobile friendly. 8 TACKLE & TARGET Country Music Will Rock This month’s Arizona angling pro is Jerry Weston.
    [Show full text]
  • Priority Prehistoric Cultural Resources, Pinal County, Arizona
    Priority Prehistoric Cultural Resources, Pinal County, Arizona Andy Laurenzi Technical Report No. 2012-101 Priority Prehistoric Cultural Resources, Pinal County, Arizona Andy Laurenzi Reviewed by: William H. Doelle Archaeology Southwest 300 North Ash Alley Tucson, Arizona 85701 Submitted to Pinal County Planning and Development Department 31 N. Pinal Street Building F Florence, Arizona 85132 Technical Report No. 2012-101 300 North Ash Alley, Tucson, Arizona ● May 2012 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to thank the many experts and tribal members who took time out of their busy schedules to attend the experts workshop, answer questions and review an earlier draft of the report. We would especially like to thank our volunteer field crew led by Cherie Freeman who was joined by Valerie Contorti, Ken Fite, Mike Gleeson and Bruce Hilpert. Catherine Gilman and Susan Hall of Desert Archaeology, Inc., assisted with the report layout and design. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................ ii List of Figures ..................................................................................................................................................... iv List of Tables ........................................................................................................................................................ v INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Restoration Design Energy Project Final Environmental Impact
    APPENDIX G RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON THE RDEP DRAFT EIS Appendix G. Response to Comments on the RDEP Draft EIS TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page G. RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON THE RDEP DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ................................................................................................................. G-1 G.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. G-1 G.1.1 Campaign letters ........................................................................................................... G-4 G.1.2 How the Appendix is Organized .............................................................................. G-4 G.2 Issue Topics, Responses, and Comments .............................................................................. G-5 G.2.1 Air Resources ................................................................................................................ G-5 Impact Analysis .............................................................................................................. G-5 Methodology .................................................................................................................. G-5 Mitigation measures ..................................................................................................... G-7 G.2.2 Alternatives .................................................................................................................... G-7 Design Features and Best Management
    [Show full text]