DOCSLIB.ORG

September 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
September 2013 September 2013 Tribal Resolution i | Page ii | Page Tribal Chairman’s Proclamation iii | Page Table of Contents Tribal Resolution .............................................................................................................................. i Tribal Chairman’s Proclamation ...................................................................................................... iii Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................ iv Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................................... vi List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ viii List of Tables ................................................................................................................................ viiii Key Terms ......................................................................................................................................... x Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 2 1.1 Characteristics and History of the Tribes .............................................................................. 3 1.1.1 Salish Culture ................................................................................................................. 7 1.1.2 Kootenai Culture ............................................................................................................ 9 1.1.3 Socioeconomic Profile.................................................................................................. 11 1.1.4 Cultural Considerations Regarding Natural Resources ................................................ 15 1.2 Why the Tribes are Planning for Climate Change ............................................................... 17 1.3 Planning in a Regional Context ........................................................................................... 18 2. Climate Impacts ........................................................................................................................ 19 2.1 Climate Impacts Regionally ................................................................................................. 20 2.2 Climate Impacts Locally ...................................................................................................... 22 2.3 Climate Impacts on the Tribes ............................................................................................ 26 2.3.1 Traditional Ecological Knowledge ................................................................................ 27 2.3.2 Tribal Elder Observations ............................................................................................. 28 3. Planning Focus .......................................................................................................................... 35 3.1 Forestry Focus ..................................................................................................................... 36 3.2 Land Focus ........................................................................................................................... 38 3.3 Fish Focus ............................................................................................................................ 38 3.4 Wildlife Focus ...................................................................................................................... 38 3.5 Water Focus ........................................................................................................................ 39 iv | Page 3.6 Air Quality Focus ................................................................................................................. 40 3.7 Infrastructure Focus ............................................................................................................ 41 3.8 People Focus ....................................................................................................................... 41 3.9 Cultural Focus...................................................................................................................... 43 4. Vulnerability and Risk ............................................................................................................... 44 4. 1 Forestry Assessment .......................................................................................................... 44 4. 2 Land Assessment ................................................................................................................ 46 4. 3 Fish Assessment ................................................................................................................. 46 4.4 Wildlife Assessment ............................................................................................................ 46 4. 5 Water Assessment ............................................................................................................. 47 4. 6 Air Quality Assessment ...................................................................................................... 49 4. 7 Infrastructure Assessment ................................................................................................. 50 4. 8 People Assessment ............................................................................................................ 50 4.9 Cultural Assessment ............................................................................................................ 51 5. Goals and Actions ...................................................................................................................... 52 5. 1 Forestry Goals and Actions ................................................................................................ 52 5. 2 Land Goals and Actions ...................................................................................................... 55 5. 3 Fish Goals and Actions ....................................................................................................... 56 5. 4 Wildlife Goals and Actions ................................................................................................. 57 5. 5 Water Goals and Actions .................................................................................................... 58 5. 6 Air Quality Goals and Actions............................................................................................. 59 5. 7 Infrastructure Goals and Actions ....................................................................................... 60 5. 8 People Goals and Actions ................................................................................................... 62 5.9 Cultural Goals and Actions .................................................................................................. 64 6. Implementation of Plan ............................................................................................................ 65 Works Cited ................................................................................................................................... 66 Endnotes ....................................................................................................................................... 68 Appendix A ‐ Methodology .......................................................................................................... A‐1 Appendix B‐ Meeting Records ..................................................................................................... B‐1 v | Page Acknowledgments This project received financial support from The Roundtable of the Crown of the Continent Adaptive management initiative through the Kresge foundation and the Great Northern Landscape Conservation Cooperative. Many people participated in the development and preparation of this plan. The Confederated Salish, Pend d’ Oreille and Kootenai Tribes would like to acknowledge contributions of the following individuals: Project Team Michael Durglo Jr., Environmental Director, Climate Change Planning Coordinator Natural Resources Department Jim Durglo, Department Head Forestry Department Rich Janssen, Department Head Natural Resources Department Roian Matt, Educational Outreach Coordinator Forestry Department Clayton Matt, Director Tribal Services Tony Incashola, Department Head Salish‐Pend d'Oreille Culture Committee Planning Committee Jason Adams, Executive Director Salish Kootenai Housing Authority Dale Becker, Tribal Wildlife Program Manager Natural Resources Department Craige Couture, Chief of Police Tribal Law & Order Mike Durglo Sr., Co‐Director (St. Ignatius) Historic Preservation/Cultural Preservation Rick Everett, Professor, Wildland Fire Sciences Salish Kootenai College Clint Folden, Regulatory Specialist Natural Resources Department Bill Foust, Division of Water Manager Natural Resources Department Judy Gobert, Suicide Prevention Trainer Social Services Department Ralph Goode, General Manager Mission Valley Power Tony Harwood, Division Manager Forestry Department Patricia Hewankorn, Director Kootenai Culture S. Kevin Howlett, Director Tribal Health & Human Services Carole Lankford, Vice‐Chair Tribal Council Janene Lichtenberg, Wildlife
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Issksiniip Project, Blackfeet Community College
    Health Professions Opportunity Grant Issksiniip Project Blackfeet Community College Robin BearChild, Issksiniip Project Coordinator Katelin Conway, Issksiniip Project Placement Counselor Health Professions Opportunity Grant Improving the Health of Our Nation • Funded by the United States Department of Health and Human Services • Target Population- TANF and other low-income individuals • Provide opportunity for participants to obtain education and training for occupations in the healthcare field • “Issksiniip”- knowing is active participation with the world and the ability to make reference to past experiences and to contextualize them in a system of meanings to make sense of present experiences and formulating the basis for decision making Goals & Objectives Improved Health Care Employment Education Conceptual Framework • Tribal Program Administration Tribal HPOG • Educational Attainment • Strategic Partnerships Programs •Educational Institutions • Employment •Tribal & Community Social Services •TANF State Agency • Employability- related •Workforce Investment Boards •Training & education programs outcomes • Leveraged Resources •Student & Family Education & Engagement •Supportive & Cultural Services Participant Infrastructure •Employment & Employability Outcomes Related Activities Blackfeet Community College Issksiniip Project • Located in Browning, MT on the Blackfeet Reservation • Tribally Controlled Community College • Establsihed in 1972 • Health Profession Degrees and Certificate Programs • 2-Year Degrees • Allied Health, Health and
    [Show full text]
  • Tcus As Engaged Institutions
    Building Strong Communities Tribal Colleges as Engaged Institutions Prepared by: American Indian Higher Education Consortium & The Institute for Higher Education Policy A product of the Tribal College Research and Database Initiative Building Strong Communities: Tribal Colleges as Engaged Institutions APRIL 2001 American Indian Higher Education Consortium The Institute for Higher Education Policy A product of the Tribal College Research and Database Initiative, a collaborative effort between the American Indian Higher Education Consortium and the American Indian College Fund ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report is the fourth in a series of policy reports produced through the Tribal College Research and Database Initiative. The Initiative is supported in part by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Native Ameri- cans (ANA) and the Pew Charitable Trusts. A collaborative effort between the American Indian Higher Education Consor- tium (AIHEC) and the American Indian College Fund, the project is a multi-year effort to improve understanding of Tribal Colleges. AIHEC would also like to thank the W.K. Kellogg Foundation for its continued support. This report was prepared by Alisa Federico Cunningham, Senior Research Analyst, and Christina Redmond, Research Assis- tant, at The Institute for Higher Education Policy. Jamie Merisotis, President, Colleen O’Brien, Vice President, and Deanna High, Project Editor, at The Institute, as well as Veronica Gonzales, Jeff Hamley, and Sara Pena at AIHEC, provided writing and editorial assistance. We also would like to acknowledge the individuals and organizations who offered information, advice, and feedback for the report. In particular, we would like to thank the many Tribal College presidents who read earlier drafts of the report and offered essential feedback and information.
    [Show full text]
  • Nifa Land-Grant Colleges and Universities
    NIFA LAND-GRANT COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES 199418901862 Northwest Indian College Aaniiih Nakoda College Turtle Mountain Cankdeska Cikana Blackfeet Community College Comm. College White Earth Tribal Community College & Community College Washington Stone Child Lac Courte Oreilles Ojibwa Salish Fort Berthold University State University College Community College Univ. Kootenai Fort Peck Comm. College Leech Lake of Maine Community University of Idaho College United Tribal College of Vermont College North Dakota Oregon State University Little Tribes Bay Mills Community College Montana Technical State Univ. Fond du Lac State Big Horn Chief Tribal & Comm. College Sitting Bull Coll. University College Dull Knife College College Sisseton Wahpeton Saginaw Chippewa University of Community College College of University of Tribal College New Hampshire Menominee Massachusetts Si Tanka/Huron Univ. University of Nation Oglala Lakota South Dakota Minnesota Cornell University College University of Michigan State University Wisconsin State University University of Sinte Gleska Univ. Rhode Island Pennsylvania State University Nebraska Indian of Connecticut Community College Iowa State University University Utah State University of Wyoming D-Q University Little Priest Rutgers University University of Nevada West Virginia University Tribal College Ohio State University University of Delaware University University Colorado State University Delaware State University of Nebraska University Purdue University of Illinois University University of Maryland of California
    [Show full text]
  • PART C—1994 INSTITUTIONS Sec
    Q:\COMP\AGRES\Equity In Educational Land-grant Status Act Of 1994.xml EQUITY IN EDUCATIONAL LAND-GRANT STATUS ACT OF 1994 [[Part C of title V of the Improving America’s Schools Act of 1994 (Public Law 103–382; 108 Stat. 4048; 7 U.S.C. 301 note]] [As Amended Through P.L. 113–79, Enacted February 7, 2014] [Equity in Educational Land-Grant Status Act of 1994] TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 PART C—1994 INSTITUTIONS Sec. 531. Short title. Sec. 532. Definition. Sec. 533. Land-grant status for 1994 institutions. Sec. 534. Appropriations. Sec. 535. Institutional capacity building grants. Sec. 536. Research grants. PART C—1994 INSTITUTIONS SEC. 531. ø7 U.S.C. 301 note¿ SHORT TITLE. This part may be cited as the ‘‘Equity in Educational Land- Grant Status Act of 1994’’. SEC. 532. ø7 U.S.C. 301 note¿ DEFINITION. 2 As used in this part, the term ‘‘1994 Institutions’’ means any one of the following colleges: (1) Bay Mills Community College. (2) Blackfeet Community College. (3) Cankdeska Cikana Community College. (4) College of Menominee Nation. (5) Crownpoint Institute of Technology. (6) D-Q University. (7) Dine College. (8) Chief Dull Knife Memorial College. (9) Fond du Lac Tribal and Community College. (10) Fort Belknap College. (11) Fort Berthold Community College. (12) Fort Peck Community College. (13) Haskell Indian Nations University. (14) Institute of American Indian and Alaska Native Cul- ture and Arts Development. (15) Lac Courte Oreilles Ojibwa Community College. (16) Leech Lake Tribal College. 1 This table of contents is not part of the Act but is included for user convenience.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised April 1, 2021; Accepted June 17, 2021; Electronically Published August 2, 2021 91
    90 Empirical Article Volume 13, Issue 3 (2021), pp. 90-133 Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education DOI: 10.32674/jcihe.v13iSummer.3279 | https://ojed.org/jcihe Turtle Island (North America) Indigenous Higher Education Institutions and Environmental Sustainability Education Kelsey Leonarda* aUniversity of Waterloo, Canada ORCID 0000-0002-7531-128X *Correspondence: [email protected] ABSTRACT This article explores the environmental and sustainability programs of Indigenous Higher Education Institutions (IHEIs) in North America. There are 38 Tribal Colleges and Universities in the United States and 26 Indigenous post-secondary institutions in Canada. Deploying a critical discourse analysis, the study examines IHEI websites to document Indigenous environmental sustainability education (ESE) program offerings. The comparative analysis of IHEI programming in each national context finds that 41 out of 62 IHEIs in Canada and the United States have Indigenous ESE programs. Findings also indicate that ESE programs are more prevalent among IHEIs in the United States than in Canada. Moreover, IHEIs in the United States also offered greater diversity of program types, from certificates to graduate studies. The findings highlight the importance of IHEI environmental and sustainability education program design for centering Received October 1, 2020; revised April 1, 2021; accepted June 17, 2021; electronically published August 2, 2021 91 Indigenous Knowledge in higher education through Indigenous-controlled institutions. Keywords: Indigenous higher education, Indigenous Peoples, environmental education, North America, comparative discourse analysis INTRODUCTION Across Turtle Island (North America) there are more than 1,208 Indigenous Nations with historic and cultural connections to the land or territories on which they live (AFN, 2021; BIA, 2021).
    [Show full text]
  • Year Seven Mission Fulfillment and Sustainability Peer-Evaluation Report
    YEAR SEVEN MISSION FULFILLMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY PEER-EVALUATION REPORT STONE CHILD COLLEGE BOX ELDER, MONTANA OCTOBER 16-18, 2017 A confidential report of findings prepared for The Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities 1 Evaluation Committee Richard W. Cummins, Ph.D., Chair President Columbia Basin College Mrs. Suzanne Bolyard College Preparation Instructor Treasure Valley Community College Ms. Patricia Charlton Senior Vice President for Strategic Initiatives and Administrative Services College of Southern Nevada Glen Cosby, Ph.D. Vice President of Student Services Spokane Community College Chato Hazelbaker, Ph.D. Chief Communications and Information Officer Clark College Mr. John Martens Vice President for Instruction Centralia College Mr. David Ongley Director, Tuzzy Consortium Library (retired) Ilisagvik College Ms. Valerie Martinez, Liaison Vice President Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities 2 Contents Evaluation Committee .................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Eligibility Requirements ................................................................................................................. 4 Institutional Context........................................................................................................................ 4 Response to Student Achievement Data ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 'Black Bear' and 'Grizzly Bear'
    Salish words for ‘black bear’ and ‘grizzly bear’1 Jan P. van Eijk First Nations University of Canada Salish languages show a wide variety of names for ‘black bear’ and ‘grizzly bear.’ A number of these are doubtless of great antiquity and some of them may go back to Proto-Salish. However, reconstruction of the proto-forms seems problematic in light of inter-Salish and extra-Salish borrowing and of what appears to be rather massive taboo- driven lexical replacement. 1 Introduction The homeland of the Salish-speaking people, which stretches from southern British Columbia into northern Washington, Idaho and Montana, and formerly also into part of the Oregon coastal area, falls within the range of two types of bear that are native to north America, the black bear (Ursus americanus) and the grizzly bear (Ursus arctos horribilis). In this article, we list the names of these bears in those Salish languages for which they have been recorded, and we try to trace their etymological history. 2 Individual languages In this section, the words for ‘black bear’ and ‘grizzly bear’ are listed for each language, and, where applicable, for individual dialects. Dialects are indicated with a long dash under their respective languages. However, in the case of Kalispel and Flathead (listed under Spokane), the long dash indicates that these linguistic entities are part of a dialect continuum with Spokane, and not dialects of Spokane. Comments on details and provenance of the various forms are given in sections 3-5. In the table on pp. 2-3, words in the Amerindianist Phonetic Alphabet (APA) are sans-serif and roman, while the pre-APA forms are serif and roman.
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Montana - Missoula
    MONTANA UNIVERSITY SYSTEM AGREEMENTS WITH TRIBES & TRIBAL COLLEGES: THE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA - MISSOULA Tribe/Tribal College Tribe/TC Contact MUS Unit Contact Purpose All Seven Tribes DPHHS-MTUPP The University of Bernadette Bannister and DPHHS-MTUPP Conference: “Many Voices, One Montana-Missoula Sharon Alexander, Message: Keep Tobacco Sacred” (Department of Public Continuing Education March 20 –21, 2001 at Salish Kootenai College Health and Human (MTUPP-RC: Hosted by UM-M Services-Montana Montana Tobacco Sponsored by DPHHS-MTUPP and Native American Tobacco Use Prevention Use Prevention Tribes Unite for Healthier Families and the Program) Program Resource Confederated Salish Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Center) Nations All Seven Tribes DPHHS-MTUPP The University of Bernadette Bannister and DPHHS-MTUPP Workshop on Writing Responses to Montana-Missoula Sharon Alexander, RFP’s for Federal Funding of Local Programs Continuing Education Hosted by CE at UM-M, sponsored by DPHHS- MTUPP Blackfeet Community Dorothy Still Smoking, The University of George Dennison, President Memorandum of Understanding for Dual Admission College President Montana-Missoula Salish Kootenai College Joseph McDonald, The University of Rustem Medora, School of Affiliation Agreement to Establish a Health Career President Montana-Missoula Pharmacy and Allied Health Pipeline Sciences Fort Peck Community Deborah Wetsit, The University of Rustem Medora, Affiliation Agreement to Establish a Health Career College Academic Vice President Montana-Missoula School of Pharmacy
    [Show full text]
  • CSKT Sustainable, Comprehensive Economic Development Plan/Strategy 2015 Page I
    CONFEDERATED SALISH AND KOOTENAI TRIBES SUSTAINABLE, COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN/STRATEGY December 2015 COMMENTS and ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes’ (CSKT) Economic Development Office would like to thank all of the Tribal members (over 771 people) who participated in the 2014 Sustainable Economic Development Study and Job and Training Needs Survey, and at public meetings to discuss Tribal economic development priorities and strategies. The results of the Study, upon which much of this Plan is built, helped shape the Workforce Development and Business Assistance strategies of this Plan, and helped identify the priorities that you feel we should be addressing in economic development. We appreciate your thoughts and ideas. CSKT would also like to thank our Partners who assisted with development of this Sustainable, Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy. Project Partners (Steering Committee members) include Steve Clairmont (S&K Business Services and Sovereign Leasing and Financing, Inc.), Vern Clairmont and Ruth Swaney (CSKT Finance Office), Arlene Templer and Kelly Whitworth (CSKT Department of Human Resources Development), Debra Krantz (Lake County Job Service), Marie Hirsch (Lake County Community Development Corporation), Amita Patel-Greer (Montana Community Development Corporation), Salish Kootenai College, Donna Mitchell (Kicking Horse Job Corps Center), Heather Sobrepena-George and Philip Belangie (Montana Department of Commerce Native American Business Development Program), Jean Matt (Mission Valley Power), Larry Hall (S&K Electronics), Tom Acevedo (S&K Technologies), the CSKT Social Services, Personnel, Forestry, Education and Lands Departments, and last, but not least, Rebecca Hendrickx, our ANA Project Assistant for the first year and a half of this project. This team’s knowledge of issues and available resources is invaluable.
    [Show full text]
  • National Center for Education Statistics
    Image description. Cover Image End of image description. NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS What Is IPEDS? The Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) is a system of survey components that collects data from about 6,400 institutions that provide postsecondary education across the United States. These data are used at the federal and state level for policy analysis and development; at the institutional level for benchmarking and peer analysis; and by students and parents, through the College Navigator (https://nces.ed.gov/collegenavigator/), an online tool to aid in the college search process. Additional information about IPEDS can be found on the website at https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds. What Is the Purpose of This Report? The Data Feedback Report is intended to provide institutions a context for examining the data they submitted to IPEDS. The purpose of this report is to provide institutional executives a useful resource and to help improve the quality and comparability of IPEDS data. What Is in This Report? The figures in this report provide a selection of indicators for your institution to compare with a group of similar institutions. The figures draw from the data collected during the 2018-19 IPEDS collection cycle and are the most recent data available. The inside cover of this report lists the pre-selected comparison group of institutions and the criteria used for their selection. The Methodological Notes at the end of the report describe additional information about these indicators and the pre-selected comparison group. Where Can I Do More with IPEDS Data? Each institution can access previously released Data Feedback Reports from 2005 and customize this 2019 report by using a different comparison group and IPEDS variables of its choosing.
    [Show full text]
  • Strengthening Systems of Care and Learning with Native Communities from Birth to Career
    Tribal College and University Early Childhood Education Initiatives: Strengthening Systems of Care and Learning with Native Communities from Birth to Career Contents About the American Indian College Fund Letter From the American Indian College Fund President 1 The American Indian College Fund (College Fund) is a national and premier fundrais- ing organization established in 1989 by tribal college and university (TCU) presidents. Executive Summary 2 The mission of the College Fund is to support TCUs in reaching optimal funding levels so that TCUs can increase access to college, and foster student success. Since 2011, Introduction 4 the College Fund increased early learning opportunities and supported the creation of systems of care and learning in seven Native communities, across seven states. Context & Framework 8 American Indian College Fund Tribal College and University Early Childhood Initiatives The Role of TCUs in Addressing Early Childhood Education 10 The American Indian College Fund (College Fund), in collaboration with Tribal Colleges and Universities, engages in early childhood education (ECE) initiatives that draw upon Tribal College and child development knowledge from within Native communities melded with the best University Early Childhood practices identified in the field of early childhood education. Education Initiative 14 TCU ECE Initiative Theory Wakanyeja “Sacred Little Ones” – of Change 16 Tribal College Readiness and Success by Third Grade Initiative Strategic Cycles of Educational Transformation: Systems Development
    [Show full text]
  • Educational Empowerment of Native American Students –
    Educational Empowerment of Native American Students: A Tribally Controlled College Leads the Way Anne Grob University of Leipzig Founded in the 1970s to address educational and cultural needs of Native Americans, Tribal Colleges1 in their relatively short period of existence “have had a major impact on the lives of Native Americans” (O’Laughlin 3). These institutions of higher learning with their unique system of knowledge and value transmission have become increasingly significant to Native students’ educational attainment and establish- ed themselves as a viable education model for many American Indian students, who otherwise might not have been able to attend and graduate from a university. Drawing upon existing secondary literature and original empirical data gathered during fieldwork in 2007,2 it is the purpose of this essay to demonstrate how a particular Tribal College in Montana, Salish Kootenai College (SKC), positively impacts the education of individual American Indian students. While every Indian Nation and their higher education institutions are unique, these findings can, to a certain extent, also be translated and applied to Tribal Colleges in general. A brief overview of the legal and social developments that led to the emergence of Tribal Colleges in the United States marks the beginning of this article. By placing the Tribal College Movement into its historical framework, I will provide the necessary background for an understanding of the reasons and the particular time for the development of Tribally Controlled Community Colleges. These remarks are followed by a summary of essential concepts and basic characteristics of Tribally Controlled Colleges that contain information about the mission of TCUs, differing types, academic degree offerings, as well as student, staff and faculty characteristics.
    [Show full text]