STG XML Validation Form

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

STG XML Validation Form STG's XML 1.0 Reference Validator STG's XML 1.0 Reference Validator Abstract This report examines why validation, and readily available validation facilities, are critical to the rapid dissemination and success of XML; it also introduces a new, public reference validator intended to help fill this niche. Table of Contents A Surprising Fact What's Wrong With Invalid XML? Valid XML and the DTD DTDs and STG's Validator Using the Validator (aka "Quick Start") Inside the Validator Availability Note: This report was written originally in October of 1998 - at a time when there were no complete, working, web-available XML validators. Since then, in addition to STG's validator, one other web-available validator has appeared (author: Richard Tobin). Others will doubtless follow. A Surprising Fact With all the hubbub surrounding XML lately - all the conferences, debates, books, papers, and articles - it is a surprising fact that only a small fraction of the XML available on the net is actually valid; i.e., only a small fraction of it follows the full February 1998 W3C XML 1.0 spec. The reason for this is simple: There isn't much XML software (as yet) to adequately generate and check it. Nor are there any full, working, web-based XML validation services analogous what we see in the HTML world. Access to validation services, however, is critical to the success of XML because without it we end up back where we started, i.e., back to the very same chaos that prompted the development of XML in the first place. In efforts to help reduce the chaos, and make validation facilities more broadly available, Brown University's Scholarly Technology Group (STG) has placed on its website a public reference XML 1.0 validator. This report examines the rationale behind that validator, and offers a brief semi-technical overview of its design. What's Wrong With Invalid XML? http://cds.library.brown.edu/service/xmlvalid/Xml.tr98.2.shtml[6/20/14 12:22:39 AM] STG's XML 1.0 Reference Validator The ubiquity of invalid XML documents (or, more broadly, our inability to detect them easily as such) presents a serious obstacle to the rapid dissemination and success of XML because it perpetuates the same interoperability problems that have hampered the development of XML's cousin, HTML. As most Web designers and programmers are well aware, nonconformant HTML (i.e., HTML that fails to validate against an IETF or W3C standard) is, in many quarters, more the rule than the exception. Nonconformant HTML, though, often works out in practice because browser manufacturers, in addition to creating their own HTML extensions, have managed to work around most of the mistakes that programmers and authors typically make. But the manufacturers can't anticipate every possible mistake; and neither can every piece of software we use with our HTML. As a result HTML software is something of a free-for-all. Some software works fine with some HTML. Other software breaks on the same material. The fundamental reason why HTML software has become such a free-for-all is that HTML began its life with no formal specification. Worse yet, when formal specifications finally did begin to appear, they came too slowly to be of much use to Web designers and programmers. As a result, every browser manufacturer felt obligated to define its own version of HTML. Microsoft and Netscape also felt it necessary to hire armies of programmers to figure out what their competitors were doing. The result has been a dramatic increase in the cost and complexity of HTML processors - and an interoperability nightmare. Valid XML and the DTD With XML ("Extensible Markup Language"), the situation is potentially quite different from what we have seen with HTML. With XML we don't have to worry as much about browser manufacturers arbitrarily redefining the specs. Nor do we have to wait for standards bodies to reach consensus. With XML, each of us has the power to take matters into our own hands; to define our own markup language, or to extend an existing one - and to decide what is, and isn't, a valid construct in that language. What is more, we can do all this in a way that conforming XML processors will understand. In other words, we can do it without creating the same interoperability problems that have dogged HTML. http://cds.library.brown.edu/service/xmlvalid/Xml.tr98.2.shtml[6/20/14 12:22:39 AM] STG's XML 1.0 Reference Validator The mechanism through which XML grants us these powers is the document type definition (DTD) - a document that specifies what elements, attributes, and entities an XML document instance may consist of, and in what order and combination. With a DTD (and a stylesheet) users have close to total control over the language and presentation of their documents. (Although HTML has official DTDs, they are controlled by standards organizations, are rarely used, and often do not reflect actual practice.) DTDs and STG's Validator Despite the freedom that XML DTDs can give us, there is, as yet, little software that allows anyone to take advantage of them. Most XML processors available now essentially ignore the DTD. And of those that do full (DTD-aware) validation, only one, as of this writing (Oct 98), is available freely over the Internet (I have not yet managed to get that validator, based in Korea, to work). See Robin Cover's definitive XML testing and validation resource list. The absence of a full, working, publicly available XML reference validator creates a critical gap, especially now that consortiums have begun popping up everywhere, defining their own XML-based formats, and laying claim to its platform independence and interoperability. Without widely available validation facilities these claims are null because there is no way to verify, or enforce, actual conformance. Perhaps not surprisingly, even an informal check of actual and proposed XML interchange formats reveals that most do not reflect valid XML 1.0 constructions. Some are so far from the spec that one wonders how anyone could call them XML. Until there is a publicly available reference XML validator people can point to, it will be difficult to stem the tide of this faux XML, and to get down to the business of creating genuinely interoperable formats, and field testing the XML processors that are to operate on them. It is in efforts to fill this need for an XML reference validator that the Brown University Scholarly Technology Group (STG) has placed on its website a simple form-based XML 1.0 validation system. http://cds.library.brown.edu/service/xmlvalid/Xml.tr98.2.shtml[6/20/14 12:22:39 AM] STG's XML 1.0 Reference Validator Using the Validator Using STG's XML validator is easy. Just go to the Web form, and either type in a local filename, or paste some actual XML into its text field; then click on the validate button. The validator will then either respond with a "validates OK" message, or else output a list of error and warning messages. Inside the Validator The overall design of STG's system is tripartite. It is a familiar design common to many "traditional" web-based interfaces. It consists of: 1. a static HTML form 2. a short (500 line) PERL script 3. a back-end written with stock programming utilities (e.g., YACC and Lex) The back end (component 3 above) is written specifically for legacy computer systems that lack intrinsic library support for Unicode and that may even have old-style SGML catalogs around. It validates at a rate of about ten seconds a megabyte on an old dual 125mhz HyperSparc 20 server, about four seconds per megabyte on a Pentium Pro 200 desktop. For more information on the back end, see its Unix man page. The PERL script (component 2 above) is something of a bottleneck, but it uses the now nearly universal CGI interface, and has the advantage of being portable and easy to maintain. The same might be said of the static HTML form (1 above), which provides a simple, effective, maintainable entry point into the system. Obviously it would be nice to have an XML-based entry point, but the software is not yet available to support this. Availability The reference validator's back end has just finished a brief in-house alpha testing, and the system as a whole is now ready for public access on STG's main website: http://cds.library.brown.edu/service/xmlvalid/xmlvalid.var We consider the system to be in beta testing now, and we invite bug reports. (Doubtless there will be more than a few of these.) The source code for the parser is available at STG's website, as are binaries for a few platforms. Please direct questions or comments on the system, or on any of the issues surrounding its release, to the STG staff (address below). STG: [email protected] http://cds.library.brown.edu/service/xmlvalid/Xml.tr98.2.shtml[6/20/14 12:22:39 AM] STG XML Validation Form XML Validation Form To validate a small XML document, just paste it into the text field below and hit the validate button. If the document is too large to be conveniently pasted into the text field, enter its filename into the local file field. You may also validate an arbitrary XML document on the Web by typing its URI into the URI field. For more instructions, see below. See also the FAQ. Local file: no file selected Suppress warning messages Relax namespace checks URI: Suppress warning messages Relax namespace checks Text: Suppress warning messages Relax namespace checks Instructions http://cds.library.brown.edu/service/xmlvalid/[6/20/14 12:22:33 AM] STG XML Validation Form This interface offers full XML 1.0 validation facilities.
Recommended publications
  • About:Config .Init About:Me About:Presentation Web 2.0 User
    about:config .init about:me about:presentation Web 2.0 User View Technical View Simple Overview Picture Complex Overview Picture Main Problems Statistics I Statistics II .next Targets Of Attack Targets Methods Kinds Of Session Hijacking SQL Injection Introduction Examples SQL Injection Picture Analysis SQL Escaping SQL Escaping #2 SQL Parameter Binding XSS Introduction What Can It Do? Main Problem Types Of XSS Components Involved In XSS Reflected XSS Picture Reflected XSS Analysis (Server Side) Stored XSS Picture Server Side Stored XSS (Local) DOM XSS Example Picture local DOM XSS CSRF Introduction Example Picture CSRF Session Riding Analysis Complex Example Hijack Via DNS + XSS Picture DNS+XSS Combo Cookie Policy Analysis Variant Components .next Misplaced Trust 3rd Party Script Picture Trust 3rd Party Script Analysis Misplaced Trust In Middleware Misplaced Trust In Server­Local Data Picture Local Scripts Analysis Same Origin Policy Frame Policy UI Redressing Introduction Clickjacking Picture Clickjacking Analysis BREAK .next Summary of Defense Strategies "Best Effort" vs. "Best Security" Protection against Hijacking Session Theft Riding, Fixation, Prediction Separate by Trust Validation Why Input Validation at Server Check Origin and Target of Request Validation of Form Fields Validation of File Upload Validation Before Forwarding Validation of Server Output Validation of Target in Client Validation of Origin in Client Validation of Input in Client Normalization What's That? Normalizing HTML Normalizing XHTML Normalizing Image, Audio,
    [Show full text]
  • Database Globalization Support Guide
    Oracle® Database Database Globalization Support Guide 19c E96349-05 May 2021 Oracle Database Database Globalization Support Guide, 19c E96349-05 Copyright © 2007, 2021, Oracle and/or its affiliates. Primary Author: Rajesh Bhatiya Contributors: Dan Chiba, Winson Chu, Claire Ho, Gary Hua, Simon Law, Geoff Lee, Peter Linsley, Qianrong Ma, Keni Matsuda, Meghna Mehta, Valarie Moore, Cathy Shea, Shige Takeda, Linus Tanaka, Makoto Tozawa, Barry Trute, Ying Wu, Peter Wallack, Chao Wang, Huaqing Wang, Sergiusz Wolicki, Simon Wong, Michael Yau, Jianping Yang, Qin Yu, Tim Yu, Weiran Zhang, Yan Zhu This software and related documentation are provided under a license agreement containing restrictions on use and disclosure and are protected by intellectual property laws. Except as expressly permitted in your license agreement or allowed by law, you may not use, copy, reproduce, translate, broadcast, modify, license, transmit, distribute, exhibit, perform, publish, or display any part, in any form, or by any means. Reverse engineering, disassembly, or decompilation of this software, unless required by law for interoperability, is prohibited. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice and is not warranted to be error-free. If you find any errors, please report them to us in writing. If this is software or related documentation that is delivered to the U.S. Government or anyone licensing it on behalf of the U.S. Government, then the following notice is applicable: U.S. GOVERNMENT END USERS: Oracle programs (including any operating system, integrated software, any programs embedded, installed or activated on delivered hardware, and modifications of such programs) and Oracle computer documentation or other Oracle data delivered to or accessed by U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Plain Text & Character Encoding
    Journal of eScience Librarianship Volume 10 Issue 3 Data Curation in Practice Article 12 2021-08-11 Plain Text & Character Encoding: A Primer for Data Curators Seth Erickson Pennsylvania State University Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Follow this and additional works at: https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/jeslib Part of the Scholarly Communication Commons, and the Scholarly Publishing Commons Repository Citation Erickson S. Plain Text & Character Encoding: A Primer for Data Curators. Journal of eScience Librarianship 2021;10(3): e1211. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2021.1211. Retrieved from https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/jeslib/vol10/iss3/12 Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. This material is brought to you by eScholarship@UMMS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of eScience Librarianship by an authorized administrator of eScholarship@UMMS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ISSN 2161-3974 JeSLIB 2021; 10(3): e1211 https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2021.1211 Full-Length Paper Plain Text & Character Encoding: A Primer for Data Curators Seth Erickson The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA Abstract Plain text data consists of a sequence of encoded characters or “code points” from a given standard such as the Unicode Standard. Some of the most common file formats for digital data used in eScience (CSV, XML, and JSON, for example) are built atop plain text standards. Plain text representations of digital data are often preferred because plain text formats are relatively stable, and they facilitate reuse and interoperability.
    [Show full text]
  • DICOM PS3.5 2021C
    PS3.5​ DICOM PS3.5 2021d - Data Structures and Encoding​ Page 2​ PS3.5: DICOM PS3.5 2021d - Data Structures and Encoding​ Copyright © 2021 NEMA​ A DICOM® publication​ - Standard -​ DICOM PS3.5 2021d - Data Structures and Encoding​ Page 3​ Table of Contents​ Notice and Disclaimer ........................................................................................................................................... 13​ Foreword ............................................................................................................................................................ 15​ 1. Scope and Field of Application ............................................................................................................................. 17​ 2. Normative References ....................................................................................................................................... 19​ 3. Definitions ....................................................................................................................................................... 23​ 4. Symbols and Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................. 27​ 5. Conventions ..................................................................................................................................................... 29​ 6. Value Encoding ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fun with Unicode - an Overview About Unicode Dangers
    Fun with Unicode - an overview about Unicode dangers by Thomas Skora Overview ● Short Introduction to Unicode/UTF-8 ● Fooling charset detection ● Ambigiuous Encoding ● Ambigiuous Characters ● Normalization overflows your buffer ● Casing breaks your XSS filter ● Unicode in domain names – how to short payloads ● Text Direction Unicode/UTF-8 ● Unicode = Character set ● Encodings: – UTF-8: Common standard in web, … – UTF-16: Often used as internal representation – UTF-7: if the 8th bit is not safe – UTF-32: yes, it exists... UTF-8 ● Often used in Internet communication, e.g. the web. ● Efficient: minimum length 1 byte ● Variable length, up to 7 bytes (theoretical). ● Downwards-compatible: First 127 chars use ASCII encoding ● 1 Byte: 0xxxxxxx ● 2 Bytes: 110xxxxx 10xxxxxx ● 3 Bytes: 1110xxxx 10xxxxxx 10xxxxxx ● ...got it? ;-) UTF-16 ● Often used for internal representation: Java, .NET, Windows, … ● Inefficient: minimum length per char is 2 bytes. ● Byte Order? Byte Order Mark! → U+FEFF – BOM at HTML beginning overrides character set definition in IE. ● Y\x00o\x00u\x00 \x00k\x00n\x00o\x00w\x00 \x00t\x00h\x00i\x00s\x00?\x00 UTF-7 ● Unicode chars in not 8 bit-safe environments. Used in SMTP, NNTP, … ● Personal opinion: browser support was an inside job of the security industry. ● Why? Because: <script>alert(1)</script> == +Adw-script+AD4-alert(1)+ADw-/script+AD4- ● Fortunately (for the defender) support is dropped by browser vendors. Byte Order Mark ● U+FEFF ● Appears as:  ● W3C says: BOM has priority over declaration – IE 10+11 just dropped this insecure behavior, we should expect that it comes back. – http://www.w3.org/International/tests/html-css/character- encoding/results-basics#precedence – http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-byte-order -mark.en#bomhow ● If you control the first character of a HTML document, then you also control its character set.
    [Show full text]
  • Automatic Detection of Character Encoding and Language
    Automatic Detection of Character Encoding and Language Seungbeom Kim, Jongsoo Park {sbkim,jongsoo}@stanford.edu CS 229, Machine Learning Autumn 2007 Stanford University 1 Introduction their methods, we aimed at a simple algorithm which can be uniformly applied to every charset, and the algorithm The Internet is full of textual contents in various lan- is based on well-established, standard machine learning guages and character encodings, and their communica- techniques. We also studied the relationship between lan- tion across the linguistic borders is ever increasing. Since guage and charset detection, and compared byte-based al- the different encodings are not compatible with one an- gorithms and character-based algorithms. We used Na¨ıve other, communication protocols such as HTTP, HTML, Bayes (NB) and Support Vector Machine (SVM). and MIME are equipped with mechanisms to tag the char- Using the documents downloaded from Wikipedia [6], acter encoding (a.k.a. charset) used in the delivered con- we evaluated different combinations of algorithms and tent. However, as native speakers of a language whose compared them with the universal charset detector in character set does not fit in US-ASCII, we have encoun- Mozilla. We found two promising algorithms. The first tered a lot of web pages and e-mail messages that are one is a simple SVM whose feature is the frequency of encoded in or labeled with a wrong character encoding, byte values. The algorithm is uniform and very easy to which is often annoying or frustrating. Many authors, implement. It also only needs maximum 256 table entries especially of e-mail messages, are not aware of the en- per each charset and the detection time is much shorter coding issues, and their carelessness in choosing correct than other algorithms.
    [Show full text]
  • Web Internationalization
    Web Internationalization Abstract This is an introduction to internationalization on Web Internationalization the World Wide Web. The audience will learn about the standards that provide for global Standards and Practice interoperability and come away with an understanding of how to work with multilingual data on the Web. Character representation and the Unicode-based Reference Processing Model are described in detail. HTML, including HTML5, XHTML, XML (eXtensible Markup Language; for general markup), and CSS (Cascading Style Tex Texin, XenCraft Sheets; for styling information) are given Copyright © 2002-2018 Tex Texin particular emphasis. Internationalization and Unicode Conference IUC42 Web Internationalization Slide 2 Objectives Legend For This Presentation • Describe the standards that define the Icons used to indicate current product support: architecture & principles for I18N on the web • Scope limited to markup languages Google Internet Firefox Chrome Explorer • Provide practical advice for working with Supported: international data on the web, including the design and implementation of multilingual web Partially supported: sites and localization considerations Not supported: • Be introductory level – Condense 3 hours to 75-90 minutes. Caution This presentation and example code are available at: Highlights a note for users or developers to be careful. www.xencraft.com/training/webstandards.html Web Internationalization – Standards and Practice Slide 3 Web Internationalization Slide 4 How does the multilingual Web work? A Simple HTML Example Page • How does the server know – my language? – The encodings my browser supports? • Which Unicode normalization is best? • Are all Unicode characters useful on the Web? • Should I use character escapes or text? • Can CSS designs support multiple languages? Web Internationalization Slide 5 Web Internationalization Slide 6 Copyright © Tex Texin 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Sphider-Plus Manual
    Sphider-plus manual Content 1. Introduction......................................................................................................................6 2. Version and legal info......................................................................................................6 3. Installation of version 3.0 – 3.2020d..............................................................................7 3.1 Preconditions...................................................................................................................................... 7 3.2 New installation................................................................................................................................... 7 3.3 Updating from version 1 and 2..........................................................................................................10 3.4 Updating from 3.x to 3.y....................................................................................................................10 4. Settings and customizing.............................................................................................12 5. Indexing..........................................................................................................................14 5.1 Various options................................................................................................................................. 14 5.2 Allow other hosts in same domain....................................................................................................15 5.3
    [Show full text]
  • Hitachi Ops Center V10.6.1 Open Source Software Packages
    Hitachi Ops Center V10.6.1 Open Source Software Packages Contact Information: Hitachi Ops Center Project Manager Hitachi Vantara LLC 2535 Augustine Drive Santa Clara, California 95054 Name of Product/Product Component Version License "Java Concurrency in Practice" book 1.0-redhat-4 Creative Commons Attribution annotations 2.5 Generic @agoric/babel-parser 7.10.5 The MIT License @agoric/babel-parser 7.12.11 The MIT License @angular-builders/custom-webpack 8.0.0-RC.0 The MIT License @angular-devkit/build-angular 0.800.0-rc.2 The MIT License @angular-devkit/build-angular 0.901.13 The MIT License @angular-devkit/core 7.3.8 The MIT License @angular-devkit/schematics 7.3.8 The MIT License @angular/animations 9.1.11 The MIT License @angular/animations 9.1.13 The MIT License @angular/cdk 9.2.4 The MIT License @angular/cdk-experimental 9.2.4 The MIT License @angular/cli 8.0.0 The MIT License @angular/cli 9.1.13 The MIT License @angular/common 9.1.11 The MIT License @angular/common 9.1.13 The MIT License @angular/compiler 9.1.11 The MIT License @angular/compiler 9.1.13 The MIT License @angular/compiler-cli 9.1.13 The MIT License @angular/core 7.2.15 The MIT License @angular/core 9.1.11 The MIT License @angular/core 9.1.13 The MIT License @angular/forms 7.2.15 The MIT License @angular/forms 9.1.0-next.3 The MIT License @angular/forms 9.1.11 The MIT License @angular/forms 9.1.13 The MIT License @angular/language-service 9.1.13 The MIT License @angular/platform-browser 7.2.15 The MIT License @angular/platform-browser 9.1.11 The MIT License @angular/platform-browser
    [Show full text]
  • Geonetwork User Manual (PDF)
    GeoNetwork User Manual Release 2.10.4-0 GeoNetwork September 23, 2021 CONTENTS 1 Preface 3 1.1 About this Project............................................3 1.2 License Information...........................................3 1.3 Author Information............................................4 2 Quick Start Guide 5 2.1 Geographic Information Management for all..............................5 2.2 Getting Started..............................................8 2.3 Viewing and Analysing the Data..................................... 21 2.4 Adding a metadata record........................................ 28 2.5 Uploading a New Record using the XML Metadata Insert Tool..................... 46 2.6 Metadata in Spatial Data Management.................................. 50 2.7 New Features............................................... 51 2.8 Installing the software.......................................... 55 2.9 Upgrading to a new Version....................................... 64 3 Administration 65 3.1 System configuration........................................... 65 3.2 Authentication.............................................. 75 3.3 OGC CSW server configuration..................................... 81 3.4 Advanced configuration......................................... 86 3.5 User and Group Administration..................................... 101 3.6 Localization............................................... 107 3.7 System Monitoring............................................ 108 4 Managing Metadata 111 4.1 Templates................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dataparksearch Engine 4.50: Reference Manual Copyright © 2003-2008 by OOO Datapark Copyright © 2001-2003 by Lavtech.Com Corp
    DataparkSearch Engine 4.50 Reference manual DataparkSearch Engine 4.50: Reference manual Copyright © 2003-2008 by OOO DataPark Copyright © 2001-2003 by Lavtech.com corp. This project is dedicated to Noémie. Table of Contents 1. Introduction............................................................................................................................................1 1.1. DataparkSearch Features.............................................................................................................1 1.2. Where to get DataparkSearch. ....................................................................................................2 1.3. Disclaimer ...................................................................................................................................2 1.4. Authors........................................................................................................................................2 1.4.1. Contributors....................................................................................................................3 2. Installation..............................................................................................................................................4 2.1. SQL database requirements ........................................................................................................4 2.2. Supported operating systems ......................................................................................................4 2.3. Tools required for installation
    [Show full text]
  • Naming Text Encodings to Demystify Them
    Naming Text Encodings to Demystify Them Document #: P1885R6 Date: 2021-08-14 Programming Language C++ Audience: LEWG Reply-to: Corentin Jabot <[email protected]> Peter Brett <[email protected]> If you can’t name it, you probably don’t know what it is If you don’t know what it is, you don’t know what it isn’t Tony Van Eerd Target C++23 Abstract For historical reasons, all text encodings mentioned in the standard are derived from a locale object, which does not necessarily match the reality of how programs and systems interact. This model works poorly with modern understanding of text, ie the Unicode model separates encoding from locales which are purely rules for formatting and text transformations but do not affect which characters are represented by a sequence of code units. Moreover, the standard does not provide a way to query which encodings are expected or used by the environment, leading to guesswork and unavoidable UB. This paper introduces the notions of literal encoding, environment encoding, and a way to query them. Examples Listing the encoding #include <text_encoding> #include <iostream> void print(const std::text_encoding & c) { std::cout << c.name() << " (iana mib: " << c.mib() << ")\n" << "Aliases:\n"; 1 for(auto && a : c.aliases()) { std::cout << '\t' << a << '\n'; } } int main() { std::cout << "Literal Encoding: "; print(std::text_encoding::literal()); std::cout << "Wide Literal Encoding: "; print(std::text_encoding::wide_literal()); std::cout << "environment Encoding: "; print(std::text_encoding::environment());
    [Show full text]