DOCSLIB.ORG

York Clergy Ordinations 1475-1500

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
York Clergy Ordinations 1475-1500 York Clergy Ordinations 1475-1500 Edited by David M. Smith 2017 www.york.ac.uk/borthwick archbishopsregisters.york.ac.uk Online images of the Archbishops’ Registers cited in this edition can be found on the York’s Archbishops’ Registers Revealed website. The conservation, imaging and technical development work behind the digitisation project was delivered thanks to funding from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Register of Archbishop George Neville (1465-1476) Register of Archbishop Laurence Booth (1476-1480) Sede Vacante register (1480) Register of Archbishop Thomas Rotherham (1480-1500) YORK CLERGY ORDINATIONS 1475-1500 Edited by DAVID M. SMITH 2017 CONTENTS Introduction v Ordinations held 1475-1500 vii Editorial notes xix Abbreviations xxi York Clergy Ordinations 1475-1500 1 Appendix I: Ordinations in the diocese of Durham sede vacante 1493 266 Appendix II: Letters Dimissory issued 1475-1500 269 Index of Ordinands 301 Index of Religious 439 Index of Titles 449 Index of Places 469 INTRODUCTION The clerical ordinations in this volume cover the years 1475 to 1500 and include the final part of the ordinations section of Archbishop George Neville’s register (Reg. 22, fos. 231v-240r, just for the years 1475-6), the ordinations section of Archbishop Laurence Booth’s register for 1476-80 (Reg. 22, fos. 362r-384v); the ordinations entered in the duplicate 1480 sede vacante register (Reg. 5A, fos. 515r-516r; BL, Cotton ms. Galba E X, fos. 133r-134r); and the concluding part of Register 23 (fos. 372r-468v) containing a record of the ordinations from the time of Archbishop Thomas Rotherham (1480-1500). In all these cases the ordinations were performed by the Archbishop’s suffragan, the Austin friar William Egremont, bishop of Dromore, who was active in the York archbishopric from 1464 to 1501.1 The suffragan was exclusively occupied in conferring orders, regardless of whether the Archbishop was absent from the diocese (extra diocesim) or within the boundaries of the York diocese at the time of the ceremony (infra diocesim).2 A record of ordinations in the Durham diocese sede vacante in 1493 undertaken under Archbishop Rotherham’s authority (Reg. 23, fos. 195v-196v) is included in an appendix. The registers also record a large number of letters dimissory granted in ths period to just over 800 York diocesan clergy enabling them to be ordained by other bishops, and this forms a second appendix to the volume. The ordinations section of these registers, following York practice, is concerned with the four orders of acolyte, subdeacon, deacon and priest – and the ordinations are recorded in this sequence within each ceremony, in the case of acolytes mostly noting their place of origin, and in the other cases recording the titles provided for the candidates from (chiefly) religious houses.3 Those clergy fortunate enough to have benefices are ordained to the title of their particular benefice and ordinations to the title of patrimony or linked with an annual rent are found, but are extremely rare at this date. Clergy from other dioceses having letters dimissory and being ordained by the York suffragan are also noted in the main sequence. Even within this relatively short time-span there is evidence of different registrational practices, no doubt dependent upon the preferences of specific registry clerks or the way the material was presented for registration. For the last year of George Neville (1475-6) and the early years of his successor Laurence Booth the regular clergy are noted at the beginning of each section (acolyte, subdeacon, deacon and priest) and there is usually a completely separate section at the end of the main list devoted to Richmond archdeaconry clergy being ordained to all four orders. From 1479 until Booth’s death the following year there is no separate Richmond archdeaconry section and the regular clergy are now placed at the end of each individual order after the secular clergy. This arrangement for the regular clergy continued throughout Thomas Rotherham’s pontificate up to 1500, but there were still fluctuations about the position of the Richmond archdeaconry ordinands. From 1480 to 1481 the separate Richmond section at the end of the main list is briefly restored but soon afterwards reverts to the single section under each order. From about 1491 onwards the lists were so registered that a list of Richmond ordinands was placed immediately after the main list of secular clergy in each order 1 L.A.S. Butler, ‘Suffragan Bishops in the medieval Diocese of York’, Northern History, XXXVII (2000), pp. 49-60, at 59. For Egremont see also BRUO, I, 632. 2 Egremont held all the ordination ceremonies on behalf of Booth and Rotherham and there is no extant evidence that these archbishops celebrated ordinations in person. He is also recorded as holding such ceremonies for Booth’s predecessor, Archbishop George Neville, apart from one occasion on 21 September 1465 (the day before his enthronement at York) when Neville celebrated an ordination in his manor-house of Bishopthorpe (Reg. 22, fo. 179r-v; Le Neve 1300-1541, VI, 5). 3 For a discussion of titles for orders in English dioceses see R.N. Swanson, ‘Titles to orders in medieval English episcopal registers’ in H. Mayr-Harting and R.I. Moore eds., Studies in medieval history presented to R.H.C. Davis, (London, 1985), 233-45, and D. Robinson, ‘Titles for Orders in England, 1268-1348’, Journal of Ecclesiastical History, 65 (2014), 522-50. v (and only demarcated from the main list by a marginal heading such as Rich’ or Rd placed at the appropriate point). Understandably in large registers where the names of thousands of ordinands are noted in this twenty- five-year period scribal errors creep in, and one can completely understand the circumstances under which this would occur. Names are mistranscribed – Wynsper at one stage occurs as Hunsper (nos. 28a, 31s, 32d, 35rd), Benson as Denson (nos.11a, 24d, 28p) etc.; entries are reversed – in no. 22 (Richmond section) Robert Gybson is ordained subdeacon to the title of Marrick nunnery and the next candidate Richard Yong to the title of Armathwaite nunnery; in the following ordination (no. 23) the titles are reversed for these adjacent candidates. In no. 41 the ordinations of two Jervaulx monks (John Dyneley and Richard Penreth) are entered in both the main section of ordinations and also in the Richmond archdeaconry section. The dioceses of candidates ordained with letters dimissory are not always noted, and sometimes Richmond entries occur in the main sequence even though there was also a separate Richmond archdeaconry section at the time. Occasionally religious candidates appear to have been entered under the wrong ordination – br. Simon Senus, canon of Healaugh Park appears twice in the subdeacon lists on dfferent dates but not in those for the diaconate (nos. 2s, 5s); br. William Rodes, canon of Worksop likewise appears in two subdeacons’ lists (nos. 1s, 5s). There is also the suspicion that names of titles were mistranscribed. At this date the vast majority of candidates had the same title for the three orders of subdeacon, deacon and priest, although changes are not unknown – for example, Richard Brown of Lincoln diocese was ordained subdeacon to the title of Burton Lazars hospital, deacon to the title of Croxton abbey, and priest to the title of Newbo abbey (nos. 23s, 24d, 25p) – but some other apparent changes suggest the possibility of hurried mistranscription when the spelling of the religious houses involved is very similar: for instance, we have candidates with titles to Kirkstead and Kirklees, to Newstead and Newburgh; to Nun Appleton and Nun Monkton; to Beauchief and Beauvale, to Thornton and Thornholme etc., which could easily have been scribal miscopying. Extensive as these records are it should not be assumed that they form a comprehensive record of York clergy ordinations in the period. Errors and omissions are understandable in view of the numbers of individuals involved and the pressures on diocesan registry staff. It has been assumed (and a certain amount of corroborative evidence is available) that the clerks used draft lists supplied and clearly sometimes not everything was to hand when they were registering. Again, Archbishop George Neville’s ordination register provides a further piece of evidence of the sort of problem that may be encountered. Fo. 228 in this register is a separate sheet of parchment sewn at the head of fo. 229 and containing a list of clergy of the Richmond archdeaconry, dated the day before the ordination ceremony. It contains a fuller list of clergy than that listed in the main sequence on the following folio. The latter omits the names of all five acolytes, one subdeacon and five priests. Presumably the separate list had been prepared in readiness for copying after the ceremony, but was hastily registered.4 A wider perusal of the York ordination registers has revealed that there was sometimes a considerable time-delay before registering the ordinations. In George Neville’s register a start was made entering the 11 June 1468 ordinations directly after those for 19 September 1467 and then the error was realised, the June 1468 list discontinued and the correct ordination ceremony of 19 December 1467 begun, followed by three others in chronological order. The June 1468 list was then resumed several folios further on (Reg. 22, f. 188r, continued in its proper sequence on fo. 195r). This chaotic 4 A comparison of the further ordinations of the ‘missing’ names makes it clear that they were in fact ordained to the particular order on that occasion, and had not failed to turn up to the ceremony. Presumably the separate sheet might have been inserted in the register when the discrepancies were discovered.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nottinghamshire's Sustainable Community Strategy
    Nottinghamshire’s Sustainable Community Strategy the nottinghamshire partnership all together better 2010-2020 Contents 1 Foreword 5 2 Introduction 7 3 Nottinghamshire - our vision for 2020 9 4 How we put this strategy together What is this document based on? 11 How this document links with other important documents 11 Our evidence base 12 5 Nottinghamshire - the timeline 13 6 Nottinghamshire today 15 7 Key background issues 17 8 Nottinghamshire’s economy - recession and recovery 19 9 Key strategic challenges 21 10 Our priorities for the future A greener Nottinghamshire 23 A place where Nottinghamshire’s children achieve their full potential 27 A safer Nottinghamshire 33 Health and well-being for all 37 A more prosperous Nottinghamshire 43 Making Nottinghamshire’s communities stronger 47 11 Borough/District community strategies 51 12 Next steps and contacts 57 Nottinghamshire’s Sustainable Community Strategy 2010-2020 l p.3 Appendices I The Nottinghamshire Partnership 59 II Underpinning principles 61 III Our evidence base 63 IV Consultation 65 V Nottinghamshire - the timeline 67 VI Borough/District chapters Ashfield 69 Bassetlaw 74 Broxtowe 79 Gedling 83 Mansfield 87 Newark and Sherwood 92 Rushcliffe 94 VII Case studies 99 VIII Other relevant strategies and action plans 105 IX Performance management - how will we know that we have achieved our targets? 107 X List of acronyms 109 XI Glossary of terms 111 XII Equality impact assessment 117 p.4 l Nottinghamshire’s Sustainable Community Strategy 2010-2020 1 l Foreword This document, the second community strategy for Nottinghamshire, outlines the key priorities for the county over the next ten years.
    [Show full text]
  • U DDPA Papers of the Palmes Family of Naburn 13Th Cent
    Hull History Centre: Papers of the Palmes Family of Naburn U DDPA Papers of the Palmes Family of Naburn 13th cent. - 1906 Biographical Background: The Palmes family traced its pedigree back to Manfred Palmes who was living in 1140 and had lands in Taunton, Somerset. It is a family unique in being able to trace an unbroken inheritance from son to son from the twelfth century to 1974, with only one exception in the eighteenth century. In 1226 lands at Naburn in East Yorkshire were assigned to William Palmes by Richard de Watervill, the brother of Maud de Watervill, William Palmes's wife. The demesne lordship of Naburn then descended in the Palmes family to the twentieth century (Baines, Old Naburn, p. 45; Allison, History of York East Riding, iii, p. 77; Foster, Pedigrees, iii). Naburn is about three miles south of York and the Palmes family built a manor house on the east bank of the River Ouse. The house was first mentioned in 1345 and had eight hearths in 1672. A drawing of circa 1720 indicates a two storey house, three bays in length with attic windows in high gables. In other words, the family was comfortably-wealthy, although it was not until the early sixteenth century that any of the male members of the family held public office. William Palmes, who was living in the middle of the fifteenth century, married Ellen Rocliffe, whose father was one of the barons of the exchequer. She provided him with three male heirs and a daughter before taking the veil during his lifetime, in 1479.
    [Show full text]
  • The King's Mother-In-Law: Anne Beauchamp, Countess of Warwick
    ....... s Richard III Society, Inc. Volume XXXVI No. 3 Fall, 2006 The King’s Mother-in-Law — Geoffrey Wheeler REGISTER STAFF EDITOR: Carole M. Rike 48299 Stafford Road • Tickfaw, LA 70466 (985) 350-6101 • (504) 952-4984 (cell) email: [email protected] ©2006 Richard III Society, Inc., American Branch. No part may be RICARDIAN READING EDITOR: Myrna Smith reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means — mechanical, electrical or photocopying, recording or information storage retrieval — 2784 Avenue G • Ingleside, TX 78362 without written permission from the Society. Articles submitted by (361) 332-9363 • email: [email protected] members remain the property of the author. The Ricardian Register is published four times per year. Subscriptions are available at $20.00 ARTIST: Susan Dexter 1510 Delaware Avenue • New Castle, PA • 16105-2674 annually. In the belief that many features of the traditional accounts of the CROSSWORD: Charlie Jordan character and career of Richard III are neither supported by sufficient [email protected] evidence nor reasonably tenable, the Society aims to promote in every possible way research into the life and times of Richard III, and to secure a re-assessment of the material relating to the period, and of the role in English history of this monarch The Richard III Society is a nonprofit, educational corporation. Dues, grants and contributions are tax-deductible to the extent In This Issue allowed by law. Dues are $35 annually for U.S. Addresses; $40 for international. Message from the Chair Each additional family member is $5. Members of the American Wayne Ingalls .........4 Society are also members of the English Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Claims to Fleta's Honors
    Volume 30 Issue 3 Article 5 April 1924 Two claims to Fleta's Honors Boris M. Komar Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/wvlr Part of the Legal History Commons Recommended Citation Boris M. Komar, Two claims to Fleta's Honors, 30 W. Va. L. Rev. (1924). Available at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/wvlr/vol30/iss3/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the WVU College of Law at The Research Repository @ WVU. It has been accepted for inclusion in West Virginia Law Review by an authorized editor of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Komar: Two claims to Fleta's Honors TWO CLAIMS TO FLETA'S 1OORS TWO CLAIMS TO FLETA'S HONORS. BoaRIs M. KoAxA.* Selden in his "Dissertatio ad Fletam"' published a copy of an interesting document the original of which is now lost. It is a memorandum in Exchequer, which tells us that on February 2, 1277, Thomas Bek loaned Henry de Bratton's "Summa de Legibus et Consuetudinibus Angliae" to Robert de Scardeburgh. Assuming, then, that all the other conditions required by the science of modern historical research are satisfied, we have here what might be termed a presumption that one of the above mentioned persons may have been the author of Fleta, since Fleta is an abridgement of Bratton's work written around the time mentioned in said Exchequer mem- •orandum. Mr. F. W. Nichols in the introduction to his translation of Britton has shown conclusively that Fleta was finished shortly after 1290, or probably towards the end of that year,2 for in the summer of 1290 it was still in the course of preparation.
    [Show full text]
  • Dale Abbey Newsletter Autumn-Winter2018.Pub
    Issue Number 13 Autumn/Winter 2018 M essage from the C h air H elloand welcome toou r winter s ion of s ome perennialplanting, news letter, its eems no time atall toprovide attrac tive, c os teffec - s inc e Iwrotethispiec e las tyear. tive and more eas ilymaintained d isplays. O u r annu al C hristmas lights events are d etailed inthe article W e have c ontinu ed ou r provision below and we look forward to of hanging bas kets inbothD ale welcoming you alltoboththe Kirk A bbey and KirkH allam and they H allam and D aleA bbey events. remaina popu larfeature throu gh- ou tthe s u mmermonths. This yearmarked the 10 0 thanni- versary of the end of W orld W ar I hope you find ou r N ews letter one and the P arish C ou nc illaid a interes ting and informative, wreathon behalfof the c ommu ni- pleas e give u s you r feed bac k as L ty, atthe Remembranc e D ay s er- we wou ldlove tohearfrom you . I vices inbothD aleA bbey and Kirk O n behalfof D aleA bbey P arish C H allam. C ou nc ilI wish you alla very k R Road s afetyhas been ofparticu lar H appy C hristmas and a P eac efu l N c onc ern over the pas t year with N ew Year. u U . regard tothe nu mber ofinc idents E along the A 60 96, pleas e s ee fu r- g O ther d etails inthe articleon page P eterFarmer r two.
    [Show full text]
  • Derbyshire Parish Registers. Marriages
    942.51019 M. L; Aalp v.4 1379092 GENEALOGY COLLECTION ALLEN COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY 3 1833 00727 4241 DERBYSHIRE PARISH REGISTERS. flDarriagea, IV. phiiximore's parish register series. vol. xc. (derbyshire, vol. iv.) One hundred and fifty only printed. I0.ip.cj : Derbyshire Parish Registers, flftat triages. Edited by W. P. W. PHILLIMORE, M.A., B.C.L., AND LL. LL. SIMPSON. £,c VOL. IV. ILon&on Issued to the Subscribers by Phillimore & Co., 124, Chancery Lane. 1908. — PREFACE. As promised in the last volume of the Marriage Registers of Derbyshire, the marriage records of St. Alkmund's form the first instalment of the Registers of the County Town. The Editors do not doubt that these will prove especially interesting to Derbyshire people. In Volume V they hope to print further instalments of town registers in the shape of those of St. Michael's and also some village registers. It will be noticed that St. Alkmund's register begins at the earliest possible date, 1538, but of the remainder, two do not start till the seventeenth century and one, that of Quarndon, synchronizes with the passing of Lord Hardwicke's Marriage Act. 1379092 It will be convenient to give here a list of the Derby- shire parishes of which the Registers have been printed in this series: Volume I. Volume II. Dale Abbey Boulton Brailsford Duffield Stanton-by-Dale Hezthalias Lownd Volume III. Stanley or Lund Duffield Spondon Breaston Church Broughton Mellor Kirk Ireton Sandiacre Hault Hucknall Volume IV. Risley Mackworth Derby— St. Alkmund's Ockbrook Allestree Quarndon Tickenhall Foremark It has not been thought needful to print the entries — verbatim.
    [Show full text]
  • York Clergy Ordinations 1374-1399
    York Clergy Ordinations 1374-1399 Edited by David M. Smith 2020 www.york.ac.uk/borthwick archbishopsregisters.york.ac.uk Online images of the Archbishops’ Registers cited in this edition can be found on the York’s Archbishops’ Registers Revealed website. The conservation, imaging and technical development work behind the digitisation project was delivered thanks to funding from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Register of Alexander Neville 1374-1388 Register of Thomas Arundel 1388-1396 Sede Vacante Register 1397 Register of Robert Waldby 1397 Sede Vacante Register 1398 Register of Richard Scrope 1398-1405 YORK CLERGY ORDINATIONS 1374-1399 Edited by DAVID M. SMITH 2020 CONTENTS Introduction v Ordinations held 1374-1399 vii Editorial notes xiv Abbreviations xvi York Clergy Ordinations 1374-1399 1 Index of Ordinands 169 Index of Religious 249 Index of Titles 259 Index of Places 275 INTRODUCTION This fifth volume of medieval clerical ordinations at York covers the years 1374 to 1399, spanning the archiepiscopates of Alexander Neville, Thomas Arundel, Robert Waldby and the earlier years of Richard Scrope, and also including sede vacante ordinations lists for 1397 and 1398, each of which latter survive in duplicate copies. There have, not unexpectedly, been considerable archival losses too, as some later vacancy inventories at York make clear: the Durham sede vacante register of Alexander Neville (1381) and accompanying visitation records; the York sede vacante register after Neville’s own translation in 1388; the register of Thomas Arundel (only the register of his vicars-general survives today), and the register of Robert Waldby (likewise only his vicar-general’s register is now extant) have all long disappeared.1 Some of these would also have included records of ordinations, now missing from the chronological sequence.
    [Show full text]
  • 9780521650601 Index.Pdf
    Cambridge University Press 0521650607 - Pragmatic Utopias: Ideals and Communities, 1200-1630 Edited by Rosemary Horrox and Sarah Rees Jones Index More information Index Aberdeen, Baxter,Richard, Abingdon,Edmund of,archbp of Canterbury, Bayly,Thomas, , Beauchamp,Richard,earl of Warwick, – Acthorp,Margaret of, Beaufort,Henry,bp of Winchester, adultery, –, Beaufort,Margaret,countess of Richmond, Aelred, , , , , , Aix en Provence, Beauvale Priory, Alexander III,pope, , Beckwith,William, Alexander IV,pope, Bedford,duke of, see John,duke of Bedford Alexander V,pope, beggars, –, , Allen,Robert, , Bell,John,bp of Worcester, All Souls College,Oxford, Belsham,John, , almshouses, , , , –, , –, Benedictines, , , , , –, , , , , , –, , – Americas, , Bereford,William, , anchoresses, , – Bergersh,Maud, Ancrene Riwle, Bernard,Richard, –, Ancrene Wisse, –, Bernwood Forest, Anglesey Priory, Besan¸con, Antwerp, , Beverley,Yorks, , , , apostasy, , , – Bicardike,John, appropriations, –, , , , Bildeston,Suff, , –, , Arthington,Henry, Bingham,William, – Asceles,Simon de, Black Death, , attorneys, – Blackwoode,Robert, – Augustinians, , , , , , Bohemia, Aumale,William of,earl of Yorkshire, Bonde,Thomas, , , –, Austria, , , , Boniface VIII,pope, Avignon, Botreaux,Margaret, –, , Aylmer,John,bp of London, Bradwardine,Thomas, Aymon,P`eire, , , , –, Brandesby,John, Bray,Reynold, Bainbridge,Christopher,archbp of York, Brinton,Thomas,bp of Rochester, Bristol, Balliol College,Oxford, , , , , , Brokley,John, Broomhall
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Sensitivity and Capacity Study August 2013
    LANDSCAPE SENSITIVITY AND CAPACITY STUDY AUGUST 2013 Prepared for the Northumberland AONB Partnership By Bayou Bluenvironment with The Planning and Environment Studio Document Ref: 2012/18: Final Report: August 2013 Drafted by: Anthony Brown Checked by: Graham Bradford Authorised by: Anthony Brown 05.8.13 Bayou Bluenvironment Limited Cottage Lane Farm, Cottage Lane, Collingham, Newark, Nottinghamshire, NG23 7LJ Tel: +44(0)1636 555006 Mobile: +44(0)7866 587108 [email protected] The Planning and Environment Studio Ltd. 69 New Road, Wingerworth, Chesterfield, Derbyshire, S42 6UJ T: +44(0)1246 386555 Mobile: +44(0)7813 172453 [email protected] CONTENTS Page SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ i 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1 Background ............................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose and Objectives of the Study ........................................................................................ 2 Key Views Study ........................................................................................................................ 3 Consultation .............................................................................................................................. 3 Format of the Report ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1570 1 1570 at WINDSOR CASTLE, Berks. Jan 1,Sun
    1570 1570 At WINDSOR CASTLE, Berks. Jan 1,Sun New Year gifts. January 3-29: William Drury, Marshal of Berwick, and Sir Henry Gates, were special Ambassadors to Scotland, sent to request Regent Moray to surrender the captured Earl of Northumberland, a leader of the Rising. After long negotiations, and payment of a large sum of money, the Earl was brought to England in 1572 and was executed at York. Anne (Somerset), Countess of Northumberland, lived abroad in Catholic countries from August 1570 to her death in 1591. Jan 6,Fri play, by the Children of the Chapel Royal.T Jan 7,Sat new appointments, of Treasurer of the Household, Controller of the Household, and Serjeant-Porter of Whitehall Palace. Jan 8, Windsor, Sir Henry Radcliffe to the Earl of Sussex, his brother: ‘Yesterday Mr Vice-Chamberlain [Sir Francis Knollys] was made Treasurer; and Sir James Croft Controller, and Sir Robert Stafford Serjeant-Porter’. ‘It is thought Sir Nicholas Throgmorton shall be Vice-Chamberlain, and Mr Thomas Heneage Treasurer of the Chamber’. [Wright, i.355]. Croft became a Privy Councillor by virtue of his office; Heneage became Treasurer of the Chamber on Feb 15; a Vice-Chamberlain was appointed in 1577. Jan 8,Sun sermon, Windsor: Thomas Drant, Vicar of St Giles, Cripplegate. Text: Genesis 2.25: ‘They were both naked, Adam and Eve, and blushed not’. Drant: ‘To be naked...is to be without armour, it is to be without apparel’... ‘Dust is Adam...Dust are all men...Rich men are rich dust, wise men wise dust, worshipful men worshipful dust, honourable men honourable dust, majesties dust, excellent majesties excellent dust’..
    [Show full text]
  • D'elboux Manuscripts
    D’Elboux Manuscripts © B J White, December 2001 Indexed Abstracts page 63 of 156 774. Halsted (59-5-r2c10) • Joseph ASHE of Twickenham, in 1660 • arms. HARRIS under Bradbourne, Sevenoaks • James ASHE of Twickenham, d1733 =, d. Edmund BOWYER of Richmond Park • Joseph WINDHAM = ……, od. James ASHE 775. Halsted (59-5-r2c11) • Thomas BOURCHIER of Canterbury & Halstead, d1486 • Thomas BOURCHIER the younger, kinsman of Thomas • William PETLEY of Halstead, d1528, 2s. Richard = Alyce BOURCHIER, descendant of Thomas BOURCHIER the younger • Thomas HOLT of London, d1761 776. Halsted (59-5-r2c12) • William WINDHAM of Fellbrigge in Norfolk, m1669 (London licence) = Katherine A, d. Joseph ASHE 777. Halsted (59-5-r3c03) • Thomas HOLT of London, d1761, s. Thomas HOLT otp • arms. HOLT of Lancashire • John SARGENT of Halstead Place, d1791 = Rosamund, d1792 • arms. SARGENT of Gloucestershire or Staffordshire, CHAMBER • MAN family of Halstead Place • Henry Stae MAN, d1848 = Caroline Louisa, d1878, d. E FOWLE of Crabtree in Kent • George Arnold ARNOLD = Mary Ann, z1760, d1858 • arms. ROSSCARROCK of Cornwall • John ATKINS = Sarah, d1802 • arms. ADAMS 778. Halsted (59-5-r3c04) • James ASHE of Twickenham, d1733 = ……, d. Edmund BOWYER of Richmond Park • Joseph WINDHAM = ……, od. James ASHE • George Arnold ARNOLD, d1805 • James CAZALET, d1855 = Marianne, d1859, d. George Arnold ARNOLD 779. Ham (57-4-r1c06) • Edward BUNCE otp, z1684, d1750 = Anne, z1701, d1749 • Anne & Jane, ch. Edward & Anne BUNCE • Margaret BUNCE otp, z1691, d1728 • Thomas BUNCE otp, z1651, d1716 = Mary, z1660, d1726 • Thomas FAGG, z1683, d1748 = Lydia • Lydia, z1735, d1737, d. Thomas & Lydia FAGG 780. Ham (57-4-r1c07) • Thomas TURNER • Nicholas CARTER in 1759 781.
    [Show full text]
  • 'She Enclosed & Decorated This Hall on the Advice of John Ruskin': Pauline
    ‘She enclosed & decorated this hall on the advice of John Ruskin’: Pauline, Lady Trevelyan and the creation of Wallington Hall’s Central Hall Lucy West Introduction On 13 May 1866 in a quiet bedroom in Neuchâtel, Switzerland – far from her home of Wallington Hall, Northumberland – Pauline Jermyn Trevelyan (née Paulina Jermyn Jermyn; 1816-1866) (Fig. 1)* took her last breath. At her bedside were her husband, who was the eminent naturalist and geologist Sir Walter Calverley Trevelyan (1797-1879), and John Ruskin (1819-1900), their trusted travel companion who was ‘with her and Sir Walter to the last’.1 Ruskin had been a continual presence in Pauline’s life from their first meeting around 1843, becoming her drawing teacher from 1847 and whom she referred to as her ‘Master’.2 Their relationship was one characterized by mutual respect afforded by Pauline’s privileged aristocratic and intellectual status. Indeed, their correspondence even reveals a certain level of dependency on Ruskin’s part. He would frequently ask Pauline’s trusted advice on subjects such as the names of flowers, a gap in his knowledge of which Ruskin was conscious: ‘I am making some studies of plants for architectural purposes in which I again want some help from you for I have no one of whom I can ask the name of the commonest plants – or rather, I am ashamed to ask their names … ’.3 This article examines afresh how the intellectual and artistic association between Pauline and Ruskin affected the enclosing and decoration of the central hall (Fig. 2) at the Trevelyan residence of Wallington Hall.
    [Show full text]