11/04/2012 Parish Initial Start Date Agreement
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
11 Witney - Hanborough - Oxford
11 Witney - Hanborough - Oxford Mondays to Saturdays notes M-F M-F S M-F M-F Witney Market Square stop C 06.14 06.45 07.45 - 09.10 10.10 11.15 12.15 13.15 14.15 15.15 16.20 - Madley Park Co-op 06.21 06.52 07.52 - - North Leigh Masons Arms 06.27 06.58 07.58 - 09.18 10.18 11.23 12.23 13.23 14.23 15.23 16.28 17.30 Freeland Broadmarsh Lane 06.35 07.06 08.07 07.52 09.27 10.27 11.32 12.32 13.32 14.32 15.32 16.37 17.40 Long Hanborough New Road 06.40 07.11 08.11 07.57 09.31 10.31 11.36 12.36 13.36 14.36 15.36 16.41 Eynsham Spareacre Lane 06.49 07.21 08.20 09.40 10.40 11.45 12.45 13.45 14.45 15.45 16.50 Eynsham Church 06.53 07.26 08.24 08.11 09.44 10.44 11.49 12.49 13.49 14.49 15.49 16.54 17.49 Botley Elms Parade 07.06 07.42 08.33 08.27 09.53 10.53 11.58 12.58 13.58 14.58 15.58 17.03 18.00 Oxford Castle Street 07.21 08.05 08.47 08.55 10.07 11.07 12.12 13.12 13.12 15.12 16.12 17.17 18.13 notes M-F M-F S M-F M-F S Oxford Castle Street E2 07.25 08.10 09.10 10.15 11.15 12.15 13.15 14.15 15.15 16.35 16.35 17.35 17.50 Botley Elms Parade 07.34 08.20 09.20 10.25 11.25 12.25 13.25 14.25 15.25 16.45 16.50 17.50 18.00 Eynsham Church 07.43 08.30 09.30 10.35 11.35 12.35 13.35 14.35 15.35 16.55 17.00 18.02 18.10 Eynsham Spareacre Lane 09.34 10.39 11.39 12.39 13.39 14.39 15.39 16.59 17.04 18.06 18.14 Long Hanborough New Road 09.42 10.47 11.47 12.47 13.47 14.47 15.47 17.07 17.12 18.14 18.22 Freeland Broadmarsh Lane 07.51 08.38 09.46 10.51 11.51 12.51 13.51 14.51 15.51 17.11 17.16 18.18 18.26 North Leigh Masons Arms - 08.45 09.55 11.00 12.00 13.00 -
Annual Report 2007 Download PDF 504.15 KB
Delivering profitable growth Annual Report and Financial Statements 2007 CONTENTS PERFORMANCE “Galliford Try has had an excellent year. We have delivered significant profit growth across all our businesses, Highlights 01 our recent acquisitions are performing The Group 02 ahead of expectations, and we are Chairman’s Statement 03 confident that our strategy will continue Business Review 04 to deliver sustainable growth and Divisional Reviews 06 increased shareholder value.” Financial Results 11 Corporate Responsibility 14 Greg Fitzgerald Corporate and Social Responsibility Report 16 Chief Executive DIRECTORS AND GOVERNANCE Directors and Executive Board 20 Directors’ Report 22 Corporate Governance Report 24 Remuneration Report 28 FINANCIALS Independent Auditors’ Report – Group 34 Consolidated Income Statement 35 Consolidated Statement of Recognised Income and Expense 36 Consolidated Balance Sheet 37 Consolidated Cash Flow Statement 38 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 39 Independent Auditors’ Report – Company 72 Company Balance Sheet 73 Notes to the Company Financial Statements 74 Five-Year Record 82 Contacts 83 Shareholder Information 84 HIGHLIGHTS For the year ended 30 June 2007 • Results ahead of expectations from Morrison Construction and REVENUE Chartdale Homes in the first full year following acquisition. +65% • Good performance from Linden Homes since acquisition; integration going well with synergies exceeding forecast. • Year end net debt of £99 million, representing gearing of 32 per cent, £1,410 m significantly better than expectations. • Current construction order book maintained at £2.1 billion. PROFIT BEFORE TAX • Record housebuilding completions of 1,526 units and landbank +75% of 11,200 plots. Encouraging sales during the summer period with current sales in hand of £323 million. -
Keep Calm and Carillion – the Company’S Pension Schemes Are More Secure Than They Look
Keep Calm and Carillion – The Company’s Pension Schemes Are More Secure than They Look Safeguarding the Carillion pension empire The company we came to know as Carillion was created in July 1999, following a demerger from Tarmac, through which it acquired a number of huge UK employers, including Mowlem and Alfred McAlpine. This gave the new company immediate responsibility for 13 defined benefit pension schemes. Almost two decades later, 27,500 people First Actuarial’s Catherine Lockyer continue to have benefits in schemes reliant on Carillion as sponsor, with close to half of sheds light on the doom and gloom these already receiving their pensions. surrounding Carillion’s pension schemes Commentators were not slow to point to The recent collapse of the construction and public problems with Carillion’s pension schemes. services contractor, Carillion plc, sent shockwaves The Guardian reported that MPs were through the British economy. accusing the company of trying to wriggle out of its pension obligations, for example. When the news broke in January, the future looked And The Economist asked whether pension uncertain for the company’s 20,000 UK employees. protection was still viable, referring to ‘a big And as industrialists took the measure of the hole’. All in all, the future of these schemes consequences for the country, other questions looked deeply uncertain, and this can only quickly emerged. have added to the anxieties of Carillion’s employees and pensioners. How would the Government deal with the huge infrastructure projects that Carillion had failed to The fantastic news, however, is that all of complete? Who would manage the maintenance Carillion’s pension scheme members have and service of hundreds of hospitals, schools and the security of the Pension Protection Fund homes? And as for the thousands of smaller (PPF). -
![J Jarvis & Sons Ltd V Blue Circle Dartford Estates Ltd [2007]](https://docslib.b-cdn.net/cover/2296/j-jarvis-sons-ltd-v-blue-circle-dartford-estates-ltd-2007-322296.webp)
J Jarvis & Sons Ltd V Blue Circle Dartford Estates Ltd [2007]
J Jarvis & Sons Ltd v Blue Circle Dartford Estates Ltd [2007] APP.L.R. 05/14 JUDGMENT : MR JUSTICE JACKSON: TCC. 14th May 2007 1. This judgment is in seven parts, namely, Part 1 "Introduction"; Part 2 "The Facts"; Part 3 "The Present Proceedings"; Part 4 "The Law"; Part 5 "The Application for an Injunction"; Part 6 "Jarvis's Challenges to the Interim Award"; and Part 7 "Conclusion". Part 1: Introduction 2. This is an action brought by a main contractor in order to prevent the continuance of an arbitration. The contractor seeks to achieve that result either by means of an injunction or, alternatively, by challenging an Interim Award of the Arbitrator. This litigation has been infused with some urgency because it was launched just fifteen days before the date fixed for the start of arbitration hearing. 3. J Jarvis & Sons Limited is claimant in these proceedings and defendant in the arbitration. Prior to 18th February 1997, the name of this company was J Jarvis & Sons plc. I shall refer to the company as "Jarvis". Jarvis is the subsidiary company of Jarvis plc. Blue Circle Dartford Estates Limited is defendant in these proceedings and claimant in the arbitration. I shall refer to this party as "Blue Circle". Blue Circle is a subsidiary company of Blue Circle Industries plc. The solicitors for the parties will feature occasionally in the narrative. Squire & Co are solicitors for Jarvis. Howrey LLP are solicitors for Blue Circle. 4. I turn now to other companies which will feature in the narrative of events. GEFCO (UK) Limited are forwarding agents. -
(Council) Councillors Cllr Fairclough Astley Bridge Ward
TYPE Title LastName Organisation/CompanyName (Council) Councillors Cllr Fairclough Astley Bridge Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Walsh OBE Astley Bridge Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Wild Astley Bridge Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Dean Bradshaw Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Haslam Bradshaw Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Hall Bradshaw Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Byrne Breightmet Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Byrne Breightmet Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Challender Breightmet Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Critchley Bromley Cross Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Wells Greenhalgh Bromley Cross Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Wilkinson Bromley Cross Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Bashir-Ismail Crompton Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Darvesh Crompton Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Harkin Crompton Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Gillies Farnworth Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Ibrahim Farnworth Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Spencer Farnworth Ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Ayub Great Lever ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Iqbal Great Lever ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Murray Great Lever ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Morris Halliwell ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Thomas Halliwell ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Zaman Halliwell ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Clare Harper Green ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Francis Harper Green ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Mistry Harper Green ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Allen Heaton and Lostock ward (Council) Councillors Cllr Rushton Heaton and Lostock ward (Council) Councillors -
Markets and the Structure of the Housebuilding Industry: an International Perspective
Urban Studies, Vol. 40, Nos 5–6, 897–916, 2003 Markets and the Structure of the Housebuilding Industry: An International Perspective Michael Ball [Paper first received, November 2002; in final form, December 2002] Summary. This paper sets out to examine why the modern housebuilding industry is organised in the ways it is and to identify some implications for the wider operation of housing markets. It concentrates on advanced economies and the impacts of market conditions, regulatory con- straints, production characteristics, institutional structures and land supply. Widespread differ- ences occur across countries in the ways in which housebuilding is institutionally structured. It is argued that these differences are generally explicable in economic terms and that regulatory practices determine much of the variation. Introduction This paper sets out to examine why the mod- neatly into the standard economics lexicon as ern housebuilding industry is organised in a competitive industry. The well-known the ways it is and to identify some implica- results for a competitive industry from tions for the wider operation of housing mar- the structure–conduct–performance paradigm kets. It concentrates on advanced economies would, therefore, seem to be reasonable hy- and the impacts of market conditions, regula- potheses to apply to housebuilding: namely, tory constraints, production characteristics, that long-run risk-adjusted returns are low institutional structures and land supply. and that housebuilding costs closely reflect At first sight, the discussion seems simple the marginal costs of inputs. In a dynamic and straightforward. Housebuilding is char- framework, there is a cyclical effect with acterised by the existence of a large number supply constraints pushing up builders’ mar- of relatively small firms. -
Housebuilder & Developer
Housebuilder HbD & Developer August 2016 EDI’s Edinburgh mixed use scheme reinvents former brewery site Croydon MP takes on Housing and Planning Call for more creativity from centre on housing Features in this issue Supplement Plus the latest Eco & Green Products Doors, Windows & Conservatories news, events and Interiors products Landscaping & External Finishes Also this month Rainwater & Greywater Products HBD speaks to HBF’s John Stewart Structural Insulated Panels (SIPs) Exclusive column from Brian Berry www.hbdonline.co.uk Reader Enquiry 401 HbD Contents August 2016 23 HEADLINES Gavin Barwell appointed as 5 Housing and Planning Minister Brian Berry discusses an 7 SME housebuilding renaissance Government quality push backed 9 by LABC ALSO IN THIS ISSUE... Industry news 4 - 27 Events 19 Industry Movers 22 Product Focus 26 Doors, Windows & Conservatories Supplement 29 - 39 41 Choose high efficiency insulation, naturally Duncan Voice from Insulation Superstore looks at the reasons why construction specifiers are increasingly investing in the benefits of eco PRODUCTS insulation products. Appointments & News 26 Building Products & Services 28 Eco & Green Products 40 - 42 45 Smart looks, smart operation Finance & Insurance 42 - 43 Fires & Fireplaces 43 The ‘wow’ factor can be achieved in new homes combined with cost- Floors & Floor Coverings 43 effective smart lighting and audio control to provide the best of both worlds Glass & Glazing 44 for developers. One company is realising the benefits in several new schemes. Interiors 45 - 46 Kitchens & Appliances 46 - 47 Landscaping & External Finishes 46 - 50 Rainwater & Greywater Products 51 - 53 48 Roofing 53 - 54 Safe, secure and sustainable Smoke & Fire Protection 54 Paul Garlick of green wall systems company Mobilane looks at the challenge Stairs, Balustrades & Balconies 57 of installing boundaries that satisfy safety and security requirements, as well Stonework & Masonry 57 as being eco-friendly. -
Appendix C. List of Consultees
Appendix C. List of Consultees C.1. Introduction C.1.1 This appendix provides a list of the organisations consulted under section 42, section 47 and section 48 of the Planning Act 2008 . C.2. Section 42(1)(a) Prescribed Consultees C.2.1 Prescribed consultees are set out under Schedule 1 of the Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 ; these are outlined in Appendix Table A below. Any variation from the list of organisations set out in Schedule 1 is clarified within column 3 of the table. C.2.2 The Planning Inspectorate provided a list of prescribed consultation bodies in accordance with Regulation 9(1)(b) of the EIA Regulations and Advice Note three 1 (see Appendix A ), referred to as the “Regulation 9 list”. Those consultees included in the Reg 9 list are included in Table A, B and C. Those consultees that were not previously identified as a prescribed consultee as per Schedule 1 are identified with asterisk (*), and were consulted in the same way as the Schedule 1 consultees. C.2.3 The list of parish councils consulted under section 42 (1) (a) is outlined separately in Appendix Table C. The list of statutory undertakers consulted under Section 42 (1) (a) is outlined separately in Appendix Table B . C.2.4 Organisations noted in Appendix Tables A, B and C were issued with a copy of the Section 48 notice, notifying them of the proposed application and with consultation information, including the consultation brochure and details of how to respond. Appendix Table A: Prescribed Consultees Variation from the schedule where Consultee Organisation applicable The proposed application is not likely The Welsh Ministers N/A to affect land in Wales. -
Download Portfolio
Structural Composites Engineered for the 21st Century Version 2.0 Project Portfolio Contents RECENT PROJECTS 1 Stadiums + Arenas 2 Buildings 3 Bridges 4 Maritime 5 Offshore 6 Special Applications 7 Production RECENT PROJECTS 1 Stadiums + Arenas University of Delaware Project Type Terraces (bleachers) Whitney Stadium Renovation July 2019 Location Newark, Delaware, US Team HOK, EDiS, FEI Corporation, Barton Mallow SPS terrace (bleacher) units were used to re-profile the existing stands of the University’s nearly 50 year old stadium, using SPS’ innovative system of ‘overdecking’ the existing precast concrete rakers with newly designed and prefabricated modular bleacher stool sets. The rapid erection cycle saw 60-80 bleachers installed in a working day, at the rate of roughly 5-8 minutes per bleacher. Included in the project were 3,625 seats including wheelchair spaces, as well as prefabricated ADA platforms. SPS bleachers and components were delivered in eighteen 40ft open top containers – 28 bleacher units per container pre-stacked in building sequence. A long-reach high capacity crane was used to lift the SPS bleacher units over the upper bowl and installed from each side onto new steel beams. spstechnology.com Stadiums + Arenas USTA Billie Jean King Project Type Terraces (bleachers) Grandstand redevelopment National Tennis Center Location Flushing Meadows, New York, US Grandstand Stadium Team ROSETTI, WSP Global (NY), AECOM Hunt September 2017 The 2016 US Open Tennis Championship marked the formal opening of the USTA’s new grandstand stadium at Flushing Meadow’s USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis Center. In partnership with Walters Group, SPS won the contract with AECOM Hunt to supply and install bleachers for the 5,800 seat grandstand. -
Housing Audit: Assessing the Design Quality of New Homes
1 SENSE OF PLACE SENSE OF PLACE 2 APPROPRIATE ENCLOSURE ■ Main Street ■ Secondary Street ■ Tertiary Street / Lane / Courtyard 3 SAFETY ■ Is there active frontage on public spaces? ■ Is there overlooking frontage on public spaces? ■ Are the public spaces well lit? ■ Is there fenestration on two elevations at corners? 4 LEGIBILITY ■ Are there orientation markers? ■ Is there a series of events/spaces? 5 EXPLOITATION OF SITE’S ASSETS ■ Are existing buildings retained? ■ Is mature planting retained? ■ Does the layout respond to topography? 6 AVOIDANCE OF HIGHWAY DOMINANCE AND PEDESTRIAN REALM ROADS, PARKING ■ Do footpaths relate to building line? ■ Does the carriageway width vary? 7 PROMOTION OF NON-CAR TRAVEL ■ Is there a permeable network of routes? ■ Are the streets designed to calm traffic? ■ Are there dedicated bus/cycle lanes? ■ Is there safe cycle storage, close to homes? 8 CAR PARKING BUILDING FOR LIFE ■ Parking Type ■ Is it well integrated with public space? ■ Is parking visually unobtrusive? ■ Is it well integrated with planting? 9 SERVICING ■ Is the waste storage unobtrusive? ■ Are servicing arrangements well integrated? 10 MOVEMENT INTEGRATION ■ Are there connections to existing footpaths? ■ Are there multiple connections to the surrounding road network? ■ Is there easy access to main routes? ■ Does the development integrate with existing built development? 11 BESPOKE DESIGN DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION ■ Is bespoke design evident? ■ Is the local vernacular employed? 12 ARCHITECTURAL QUALITY ■ Are good quality materials used? ■ Is attention -
Planning Statement Glenmore Farm, Westbury
Planning Statement Glenmore Farm, Westbury July 2015 Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. The Proposal 3 3. The Site and Context 5 4. Planning Policy Context 6 5. Planning Assessment 12 6. Planning Obligations – Draft Heads of Terms 24 7. Summary and Conclusions 26 Contact Andrew Ross [email protected] Client Taylor Wimpey LPA Reference Wiltshire Council July 2015 1. Introduction 1.1 This Planning Statement has been prepared by Turley to accompany an outline application for planning permission submitted by Taylor Wimpey for up to 145 dwellings at Glenmore Farm, Westbury. 1.2 In addition to this Planning Statement the following documents also accompany the application and provide the information necessary to describe, assess and determine the proposals. • Site Location (Red Line) Plan – Ref. TAYA2036_1001B; • Buildings to be Demolished Plan – Ref. TAYA2036_4401; • Access Plan – Ref.27325-002-006A; • Illustrative Masterplan – Ref. TAYA2036_3207B; • Land Areas Plan – Ref. TAYA2036_3602; • Design and Access Statement; • Planning Statement - including Draft Heads of Terms; • Topographical Survey; • Statement of Community Involvement; • Transport Assessment; • Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment; • Ecological Impact Assessment Report; • Ecological Mitigation and Enhancement Strategy; • Flood Risk Assessment; • Utility Infrastructure Site Appraisal; • Phase 1 Ground Condition Assessment; • Tree Survey; • Noise Assessment Report; • Historic Environment – Desk Based Assessment; • Historic Environment – Gradiometer Survey Report; • Agricultural Land Classification Report; 1 • Additional CIL questions; 1.3 This Planning Statement is structured as follows: • Description of the proposal (Section 2); • Description of the Site and Context (Section 3); • A summary of the Planning Policy Context (Section 4); • Planning Assessment (Section 5); • A summary of Section 106 Agreement Heads of Terms (Section 6); and • Summary and Conclusions (Section 7). -
31. Infrastructure Delivery Plan
Outline Planning Application INFRASTRUCTURE DELIVERY PLAN June 2020 Application Documents and Drawings Document Name Reference Number Outline Planning Application Guide N/A Application Form and Certificates N/A Location Plan (OGV-DWG-APPR-LP-01) Planning Application Boundary (OGV-DWG-APPR-PAB-01) Building Demolition Plan (OGV-DWG-APPR-BDP-01) A40 Western Access drawing (OGV-DWG-APPR-A40A-01) Lower Road Northern Site Access drawing (OGV-DWG-APPR-LRNA-01) Lower Road Site Access drawing (OGV-DWG-APPR-LRA-01) Cuckoo Lane Residential Access drawing (OGV-DWG-APPR-CLRA-01) Parameter Plans Booklet (OGV-DOC-APPR-PP-01) Parameter Plan 1: Land Use (OGV-DWG-APPR-PP1-01) Parameter Plan 2: Landscape (OGV-DWG-APPR-PP2-01) Parameter Plan 3: Movement and Access (OGV-DWG-APPR-PP3-01) Parameter Plan 4: Building Heights (OGV-DWG-APPR-PP4-01) Development Specification and Framework (OGV-DOC-APPR-DSF-01) Site-wide Design Code (OGV-DOC-APPR-SWDC-01) Illustrative Masterplan (OGV-DWG-ILL-IMP-01) Blue Line Plan (OGV-DWG-INF-BLP-01) Planning Statement (OGV-DOC-INF-PS-01) Design and Access Statement (OGV-DOC-INF-DAS-01) Transport Assessment (OGV-DOC-INF-TA-01) Affordable Housing Statement (OGV-DOC-INF-AHS-01) Arboricultural Impact Assessment (OGV-DOC-INF-AIA-01) Biodiversity Mitigation, Monitoring and Management Framework (OGV-DOC-INF-BMMMF-01) Draft Heads of Terms for Section 106 Agreement (OGV-DOC-INF-DHOT-01) Environmental Statement Non-Technical Summary (OGV-DOC-INF-ESNTS-01) Environmental Statement - Volume 1 - Main Report (OGV-DOC-INF-ES-01) Environmental