DOCSLIB.ORG

Information to Users

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Information to Users INFORMATION TO USERS The most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this manuscript from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. University Microfilms International A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Z eeb Road. Ann Arbor. Ml 48106-1346 USA 313-761-4700 800/521-0600 Order Number 9105116 The secession crisis in Virginia: A critical study of argument Golden, Alan Lawrence, Ph.D. The Ohio State University, 1990 Copyright ©1990 by Golden, Alan Lawrence. All rights reserved. UMI 300 N. Zeeb Rd. Ann Aibor, MI 48106 THE SECESSION CRISIS IN VIRGINIA: A Critical Study of Argument DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Alan Lawrence Golden, B.A. , M. A. ***** THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY 1990 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Merton L. Dillon is l ' t c '_ } ' \ Paul C. Bowers Advisor Department of History Bradley Chapin Copyright by Alan Lawrence Golden 1990 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express sincere appreciation to the members of my dissertation committee for all their assistance during this project. A special acknowledgment is extended to my advisor, Professor Merton L. Dillon, for his guidance and insight throughout my graduate program. Thanks also go to other members of the Ohio State history faculty who assisted me during my program, including Michael Les Benedict, Martha Garland, K. Austin Kerr, and Randolph Roth. Finally, I would like to express love and appreciation to my wife Kimberly, my parents, and other members of my family for their love, patience, and understanding. This degree certainly would not have been possible without the support of family and friends. ii VITA March 20, 1956.................... Born - Los Angeles, California 1978. .............................. B. A. , University of Richmond, Richmond, Virginia 1981................................M.A. , University of Richmond, Richmond, Virginia 1979-1984 ......................... Archivist, Virginia Historical Society, Richmond, Virginia 1984-1985 ......................... Research Archivist, Virginia State Library, Richmond, Virginia 1980-1985 ......................... Acting Curator, Edgar Allan Poe Museum, Richmond, Virginia 1985-1987 ......................... Academic Advisor, University College, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 1987-1989 ......................... Graduate Teaching Associate, Department of History, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 1989-1990 Adjunct instructor of history, University of Richmond, Virginia Commonwealth University, and J. Sargeant Reynolds Community College, Richmond, Virginia Major Field of Study: History iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS............................................ ii VITA ....................................................... iii LIST OF T A B L E S .............................................. vi CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION......................................... 1 The Historical Setting of the Secession Crisis in Virginia .................................. 4 Historical Problem and Questions to be Addressed ..................................... 9 Status of Existing Literature.................. 15 Importance of Geography, Economics, and Demographics in Antebellum Virginia Politics....................................... 18 Materials Available for Investigation............ 25 Organizational Approach............................ 28 II. VIRGINIA’S DEVELOPING PERCEPTIONS OF ITS ROLE IN THE UNION IN 'THE EARLY NATIONAL AND ANTEBELLUM PERIODS, 1787-1859.................................. 34 Constitutional Debate in Virginia.................38 Jeffersonian Republicanism and the Emerging Concept of States’ Rights .................. 57 Virginians and Slavery ......................... 82 Response in Virginia to Events in the Period of Increasing Political Tensions, 1820- 1859............................................ 97 III. ELECTION OF I860.................................... 151 Crisis of 1859 .................................. 153 Nominations......................................... 160 Campaign in Virginia ........................... 184 Election in Virginia ........................... 192 Republican Victory .............................. 196 iv Table of Contents (continued) IV. VIRGINIA FACTIONS AND THE IMMEDIATE RESPONSE TO THE ELECTION OF LINCOLN ............................. 208 Factions........................................... 210 Secession of South Carolina .................. 225 Crittenden Compromise ......................... 231 V. THE CRISIS OF 1861 AND THE VIRGINIA VOTE FOR SECESSION ............................................. 243 Early Attempts at Moderation in the Virginia Legislature.................................... 244 Election of Convention Delegates.................248 Formation of the Confederate States of America.........................................257 Washington Peace Conference .................. 262 Inauguration of the Republican Administration .............................. 266 Secession of Virginia ......................... 276 VI. CONCLUSION.................................... 311 A P P E N D I X .......................................................337 BIBLIOGRAPHY ................................................ 352 v LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Virginia County Vote In 1860................... 338 2. Delegate Vote on Secession........................ 342 3. Voting and County Geographic Designation. 347 vi CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Few topics in American history have been analysed as often or with as much vigor and partiality as has the antebellum sectional crisis. From the period immediately following the Civil War to the present, major shifts have occurred in the historiography of the pre-war period.1 In the decade preceding the centennial observance of the Civil War, leading American historians engaged in a particularly lively debate on the present condition and future prospects of the study of the antebellum period. In I960, David Donald declared that historians had reached an impasse in the interpretation of the causes of the Civil War.2 Kenneth Stampp disagreed, claiming that the century of inquiry into the sectional conflict had "gradually enlarged our knowledge and deepened our understanding of our greatest national crisis.” Stampp saw little hope in historians arriving at consensus agreement on the causes of the Civil War, but he believed the constant reevaluation of the sources added to the already healthy and vital historiographical discussion of the subject.3 David Potter agreed with Stampp. In an essay first published in 1961, Patter claimed that "the last three decades have witnessed considerable advances in the historical understanding of many of the developments which preceded the Civil War."* Over a decade later, Eric Foner concurred with the assessments of Stampp and Potter. In a paper delivered before the Organization of American Historians in 1972, Foner stressed that new understandings of antebellum politics, race relations, and slavery had emerged in the 1960s and early 1970s. He also noted that changes in methodology had allowed historians to focus more directly on issues and societal relationships that previously had been ignored.3 In the years following Foner’s essay, historians using new methods and new interpretations of the political, ideological, and social aspects of this crisis have presented an even more refined picture of the secession of the South. Socialist and Marxist historians have revived economic interpretations, placing their theories within the social and cultural context of the plantation economy. Also, the prominent role of the black slaves in the southern system continues to be addressed. In the past decade, many historians also have revived the comprehensive political analysis of the period. Quantitative methodology has allowed historians to delve into new sources and reevaluate previously studied materials. Concepts such as republican ideology also have become a major part of the evolving interpretation of the southern secession movement. The study of individuals and Issues once thought to have exercised only a passive or subordinate role in antebellum American society is now viewed as essential to the understanding
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Senators You Have to Know John C. Calhoun –
    Senators You Have To Know John C. Calhoun – South Carolina / serving terms in the United States House of Representatives, United States Senate and as the seventh Vice President of the United States (1825–1832), as well as secretary of war and state. Democrats After 1830, his views evolved and he became a greater proponent of states' rights, limited government, nullification and free trade; as he saw these means as the only way to preserve the Union. He is best known for his intense and original defense of slavery as something positive, his distrust of majoritarianism, and for pointing the South toward secession from the Union. Nullification is a legal theory that a state has the right to nullify, or invalidate, any federal law which that state has deemed unconstitutional. The theory of nullification has never been legally upheld;[1] rather, the Supreme Court has rejected it. The theory of nullification is based on a view that the States formed the Union by an agreement (or "compact") among the States, and that as creators of the federal government, the States have the final authority to determine the limits of the power of that government. Under this, the compact theory, the States and not the federal courts are the ultimate interpreters of the extent of the federal government's power. The States therefore may reject, or nullify, federal laws that the States believe are beyond the federal government's constitutional powers. The related idea of interposition is a theory that a state has the right and the duty to "interpose" itself when the federal government enacts laws that the state believes to be unconstitutional.
    [Show full text]
  • The Storycontinues
    FLORIDA . The Story Continues CHAPTER 10, The Age of Jackson (1828–1840) PEOPLE Mid 1700s: The Miccosukee Creeks settle in Florida. e Lower Creek and Upper Creek Indians moved from Georgia and Alabama to Florida in the mid-1700s. e two groups lived in Florida, but had di erent languages. e Upper Creek Indians came to be known as the Seminoles. e Lower Creek Indians, who came to be known as the Miccosukee, settled in central Florida where they built log cabins and farmed on communal plantations. Together the Seminoles and Miccosukee fought against the United States in the Seminole Wars. EVENTS 1832: The Seminole Indians are forced to sign the Treaty of Payne’s Landing. e Indian Removal Act of 1830 stated that all Native Americans who lived east of the Missis- sippi River must move to a newly created Indian Territory, in what is now Oklahoma. Two years later, Florida’s Seminole Indians were forced to sign the Treaty of Payne’s Landing, in which they stated they would move west to the Indian Territory and give up all of their claims to land in Florida. PEOPLE 1837: Chief Coacoochee (circa 1809–1857) escapes from the United States prison at Fort Marion. Chief Coa- coochee, whose name means “wild cat,” was a Seminole leader Florida. .The Story Continues during the Second Seminole War. After being captured by American soldiers in 1837, Coacoochee and a few Seminole cellmates escaped. Coacoochee returned to lead his people in See Chapter 1 battle against the United States. As the Seminole War contin- ued, the Native Americans su ered hunger and starvation when they could not plant crops to feed their people.
    [Show full text]
  • The Free State of Winston"
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Doctoral Dissertations Student Scholarship Spring 2019 Rebel Rebels: Race, Resistance, and Remembrance in "The Free State of Winston" Susan Neelly Deily-Swearingen University of New Hampshire, Durham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation Recommended Citation Deily-Swearingen, Susan Neelly, "Rebel Rebels: Race, Resistance, and Remembrance in "The Free State of Winston"" (2019). Doctoral Dissertations. 2444. https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation/2444 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REBEL REBELS: RACE, RESISTANCE, AND REMEMBRANCE IN THE FREE STATE OF WINSTON BY SUSAN NEELLY DEILY-SWEARINGEN B.A., Brandeis University M.A., Brown University M.A., University of New Hampshire DISSERTATION Submitted to the University of New Hampshire In Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History May 2019 This dissertation has been examined and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Ph.D. in History by: Dissertation Director, J. William Harris, Professor of History Jason Sokol, Professor of History Cynthia Van Zandt, Associate Professor of History and History Graduate Program Director Gregory McMahon, Professor of Classics Victoria E. Bynum, Distinguished Professor Emeritus of History, Texas State University, San Marcos On April 18, 2019 Original approval signatures are on file with the University of New Hampshire Graduate School.
    [Show full text]
  • Loudoun County African-American Historic Architectural Resources Survey
    Loudoun County African-American Historic Architectural Resources Survey Lincoln "Colored" School, 1938. From the Library of Virginia: School Building Services Photograph Collection. Prepared by: History Matters, LLC Washington, DC September 2004 Sponsored by the Loudoun County Board of Supervisors & The Black History Committee of the Friends of the Thomas Balch Library Leesburg, VA Loudoun County African-American Historic Architectural Resources Survey Prepared by: Kathryn Gettings Smith Edna Johnston Megan Glynn History Matters, LLC Washington, DC September 2004 Sponsored by the Loudoun County Board of Supervisors & The Black History Committee of the Friends of the Thomas Balch Library Leesburg, VA Loudoun County Department of Planning 1 Harrison Street, S.E., 3rd Floor Leesburg, VA 20175 703-777-0246 Table of Contents I. Abstract 4 II. Acknowledgements 5 III. List of Figures 6 IV. Project Description and Research Design 8 V. Historic Context A. Historic Overview 10 B. Discussion of Surveyed Resources 19 VI. Survey Findings 56 VII. Recommendations 58 VIII. Bibliography 62 IX. Appendices A. Indices of Surveyed Resources 72 B. Brief Histories of Surveyed Towns, Villages, Hamlets, 108 & Neighborhoods C. African-American Cemeteries in Loudoun County 126 D. Explanations of Historic Themes 127 E. Possible Sites For Future Survey 130 F. Previously Documented Resources with Significance to 136 Loudoun County’s African-American History 1 Figure 1: Map of Loudoun County, Virginia with principal roads, towns, and waterways. Map courtesy of the Loudoun County Office of Mapping. 2 Figure 2. Historically African-American Communities of Loudoun County, Virginia. Prepared by Loudoun County Office of Mapping, May 15, 2001 (Map #2001-015) from data collected by the Black History Committee of the Friends of Thomas Balch Library, Leesburg, Va.
    [Show full text]
  • Buckland History
    HISTORIC SITE FILE: Bu ti< LftAl D PRINCE WILLIAM PVBUC LIBRARY SYSTEM RELIC/Bull Run Reg Lib Manassas, VA Buckland History Prior to the establishment of Buckland Towne in 1798, this same site, on the banks of Broad Run, was a thriving prehistoric, Native American settlement. The first recorded deeds make reference to the "Indian Springs". There were five springs, which indicates a rather large Indian population. Jefferson Street, that bisects the village of Buckland, was once known as the Iroquois Trail. (Record of this Trail appears in 1662, when Col. Abraham Wood, a noted surveyor of his day, reported that "the Susquehannoc Indians would leave their main village about forty miles up the Susquehanna River; make their way to Point of Rocks, thence down into North Carolina, where they would barter with Indians on the Yadkin River for beaver skins, then return to New Amsterdam and sell their skins to the Dutch".) After the Treaty of Albany was signed in 1722, the trail be~ame known as the Carolina Trail or Road. This location on the banks of Broad Run with a never failing, swift flow of water, proved to be as desirable to the European settlers but, rather for the establishment of mills. The land at Buckland was originally part of the Broad Run Tract owned by Robert (King) Carter and after his death, his sons, Landon and Charles, deeded the tract in 1771 to brother-in-law Walker Taliaferro. The Carter family had operated a Mill here in the early 177o's when the property was conveyed in 1774 to Samuel Love "together with the mill built and erected thereon and the land mill dam and other appurtenances used with said mill".
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia Commonwealth University Commencement Program, MCV Campus Virginia Commonwealth University
    Virginia Commonwealth University VCU Scholars Compass VCU Commencement Programs VCU University Archives 1969 Virginia Commonwealth University Commencement Program, MCV Campus Virginia Commonwealth University Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/vcucommence © Virginia Commonwealth University Downloaded from http://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/vcucommence/2 This Program is brought to you for free and open access by the VCU University Archives at VCU Scholars Compass. It has been accepted for inclusion in VCU Commencement Programs by an authorized administrator of VCU Scholars Compass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Commencement Program MEDICAL COLLEGE OF VIRGINIA HEALTH SCIENCES DIVISION OF VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY THE MOSQUE Saturday Afternoon, June Seventh Nineteen Hundred and Sixty-Nine Four O'Clock PROGRAM ORGAN MUSIC GRAY M. BROADDUS ACADEMIC PROCESSION (The audience will rise as the academic procession enters the auditorium and will remain standing until after the invocation.) INVOCATION THE REVEREND DR. GLENN R. PRATI' Director of Religious Activities COMMENCEMENT ADDRESS Dickens Revisited DR. w ARREN w. BRANDT President, f/irginia Commonwealth University CONFERRING DEGREES BENEDICTION THE REVEREND A. PATRICK L. PREST, JUNIOR Chaplain of the College Hospitals RECESSIONAL (Following the benediction, the audience will remain standing whiie the academic procession leaves the auditorium.) VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY BOARD OF VISITORS ANDREW J. BRENT, LL.B. _______ _______ ____ _____ __________ ______ _____ __ Richmond Attorney-at-Law MRS. JAMES B. BULLARD, B.F.A, ______________________________________ Richmond VIRG!NIUS DABNEY, A.B., A.M., D.LITT., LL.D,------------------------Richmond Retired Editor, Richmond Times-Dispatch EPPA HUNTON IV, B.A., LL.B, ____ ____ __ ___ ____ __ ___ ___ __ ___ _____ _____ Richmond Attorney-at-Law C.
    [Show full text]
  • Using the 5Ps Leadership Analysis to Examine the Battle of Antietam: an Explanation and Case Study
    Journal of Leadership Education Volume 11, Issue 1 – Winter 2012 Using the 5Ps Leadership Analysis to Examine the Battle of Antietam: An Explanation and Case Study Bradley Z. Hull, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Logistics Department of Management, Marketing, and Logistics John Carroll University University Heights, OH [email protected] Scott J. Allen, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Management Department of Management, Marketing, and Logistics John Carroll University University Heights, OH [email protected] Abstract The authors describe an exploratory analytical tool called The 5Ps Leadership Analysis (Personal Attributes, Position, Purpose, Practices/Processes, and Product) as a heuristic for better understanding the complexities of leadership. Using The 5Ps Leadership Analysis , the authors explore the leadership of General Robert E. Lee of the Confederate Army of Northern Virginia and General George B. McClellan of the Union Army of the Potomac—more specifically, the leadership of the two generals on September 17, 1862 during the Battle of Antietam. The paper concludes with suggestions for application in the classroom. Introduction This case study examines how two organizations compete and how two leaders can influence change and success given their resources. One organization is small and underfinanced with antiquated equipment. The other is large, well financed, and organized along traditional lines where each part of the organization operates autonomously and is coordinated by top levels of management. This type of confrontation between a small organization and a large competitor occurs often in American business. Two relevant examples might be Dell (in its early days) versus Compaq and Amazon.com (in its early days) versus Barnes and Noble or the now bankrupt Borders.
    [Show full text]
  • Antislavery Violence and Secession, October 1859
    ANTISLAVERY VIOLENCE AND SECESSION, OCTOBER 1859 – APRIL 1861 by DAVID JONATHAN WHITE GEORGE C. RABLE, COMMITTEE CHAIR LAWRENCE F. KOHL KARI FREDERICKSON HAROLD SELESKY DIANNE BRAGG A DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History in the Graduate School of The University of Alabama TUSCALOOSA, ALABAMA 2017 Copyright David Jonathan White 2017 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the collapse of southern Unionism between October 1859 and April 1861. This study argues that a series of events of violent antislavery and southern perceptions of northern support for them caused white southerners to rethink the value of the Union and their place in it. John Brown’s raid at Harpers Ferry, Virginia, and northern expressions of personal support for Brown brought the Union into question in white southern eyes. White southerners were shocked when Republican governors in northern states acted to protect members of John Brown’s organization from prosecution in Virginia. Southern states invested large sums of money in their militia forces, and explored laws to control potentially dangerous populations such as northern travelling salesmen, whites “tampering” with slaves, and free African-Americans. Many Republicans endorsed a book by Hinton Rowan Helper which southerners believed encouraged antislavery violence and a Senate committee investigated whether an antislavery conspiracy had existed before Harpers Ferry. In the summer of 1860, a series of unexplained fires in Texas exacerbated white southern fear. As the presidential election approached in 1860, white southerners hoped for northern voters to repudiate the Republicans. When northern voters did not, white southerners generally rejected the Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Arkansas Moves Toward Secession and War
    RICE UNIVERSITY WITH HESITANT RESOLVE: ARKANSAS MOVES TOWARD SECESSION AND WAR BY JAMES WOODS A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE MASTER OF ARTS Dr.. Frank E. Vandiver Houston, Texas ABSTRACT This work surveys the history of ante-bellum Arkansas until the passage of the Ordinance of Secession on May 6, 186i. The first three chapters deal with the social, economic, and politicai development of the state prior to 1860. Arkansas experienced difficult, yet substantial .social and economic growth during the ame-belium era; its percentage of population increase outstripped five other frontier states in similar stages of development. Its growth was nevertheless hampered by the unsettling presence of the Indian territory on its western border, which helped to prolong a lawless stage. An unreliable transportation system and a ruinous banking policy also stalled Arkansas's economic progress. On the political scene a family dynasty controlled state politics from 1830 to 186u, a'situation without parallel throughout the ante-bellum South. A major part of this work concentrates upon Arkansas's politics from 1859 to 1861. In a most important siate election in 1860, the dynasty met defeat through an open revolt from within its ranks led by a shrewd and ambitious Congressman, Thomas Hindman. Hindman turned the contest into a class conflict, portraying the dynasty's leadership as "aristocrats" and "Bourbons." Because of Hindman's support, Arkansans chose its first governor not hand¬ picked by the dynasty. By this election the people handed gubernatorial power to an ineffectual political novice during a time oi great sectional crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • To Live and Die in Dixie: Robert E. Lee and Confederate Nationalism Jacob A
    Western Kentucky University TopSCHOLAR® Honors College Capstone Experience/Thesis Honors College at WKU Projects 2010 To Live and Die in Dixie: Robert E. Lee and Confederate Nationalism Jacob A. Glover Western Kentucky University Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/stu_hon_theses Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Glover, Jacob A., "To Live and Die in Dixie: Robert E. Lee and Confederate Nationalism" (2010). Honors College Capstone Experience/ Thesis Projects. Paper 267. http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/stu_hon_theses/267 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by TopSCHOLAR®. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors College Capstone Experience/ Thesis Projects by an authorized administrator of TopSCHOLAR®. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Copyright by Jacob A. Glover 2010 ABSTRACT Robert E. Lee is undeniably one of the most revered figures in American history, and yet despite the adoration awarded to the man over the years, surprisingly little scholarly research has dedicated itself to an inquiry into his nationalistic leanings during the four most important years of his life—the Civil War. In fact, Lee was a dedicated Confederate nationalist during his time in service to the Confederacy, and he remained so for the rest of his life, even after his surrender at Appomattox and the taking of an oath to regain his United States citizenship. Lee identified strongly with a Southern view of antebellum events, and his time in the Confederate army hardened him to the notion that the only practical reason for waging the Civil War was the establishment of an independent Southern nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War 150 Reader 4
    CIVIL WAR 150 • READER #4 Contents From SLAVERY to FREEDOM Introduction by Thavolia Glymph . 3 Introduction by Thavolia Glymph Benjamin F. Butler to Winfield Scott, May 24 , 1861 . 6 Abraham Lincoln to Orville H. Browning, September 22 , 1861 . 9 Let My People Go, December 21 , 1861 . 12 Frederick Douglass: What Shall be Done with the Slaves If Emancipated? January 1862 . 16 John Boston to Elizabeth Boston, January 12 , 1862 . 21 George E. Stephens to the Weekly Anglo-African, March 2, 1862 . 23 Garland H. White to Edwin M. Stanton, May 7, 1862 . 28 Memorial of a Committee of Citizens of Liberty County, Georgia, August 5, 1862 . 30 Harriet Jacobs to William Lloyd Garrison, September 5, 1862 . 36 Abraham Lincoln: Preliminary Emancipation Proclamation, CIVIL WAR 372: Exploring the War and Its September 22 , 1862 . 45 Meaning Through the Words of Those Who Lived It Debate in the Confederate Senate on Retaliation for is a national public programing initiative designed to encourage the Emancipation Proclamation, September 29 , October 1, 1862 . 49 public exploration of the transformative impact and contested meanings of the Civil War through primary documents and firsthand accounts. Samuel Sawyer, Pearl P. Ingalls, and Jacob G. Forman to Samuel R. Curtis, December 29 , 1862 . 54 Abraham Lincoln: Final Emancipation Proclamation, The project is presented by January 1, 1863 . 56 The Library of America Biographical Notes . 59 Chronology . 64 in partnership with Questions for Discussion . 67 and is supported by a grant from Introduction Introduction, headnotes, and back matter copyright © 2012 by Literary Classics of the United States, Inc., New York, N.Y.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Orleans Press-Radio War and Huey P. Long, 1922-1936
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Louisiana State University Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2002 The ewN Orleans press-radio war and Huey P. Long, 1922-1936 Brian David Collins Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Collins, Brian David, "The eN w Orleans press-radio war and Huey P. Long, 1922-1936" (2002). LSU Master's Theses. 3415. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/3415 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE NEW ORLEANS PRESS-RADIO WAR AND HUEY P. LONG, 1922-1936. A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts In The Department of History By Brian David Collins B.A., Louisiana State University, 2000 August, 2002 Acknowledgements I have incurred debts from many people throughout the course of writing this thesis, without whose help, it would have never been finished. I’d like to thank the staff of the Paul Hebert Louisiana State University Law Library, particularly Government Documents Librarian Charlene Cain and Librarian Services Coordinator Randy Thompson, as well as Arthur Carpenter, Archivist at Loyola University in New Orleans.
    [Show full text]