Select List of Collection Processed by Craig Moore
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Nineteenth Century Court Records
Nineteenth Century Court Records Subject Court Year Isaac H. Aldrich vs. Joseph B. Mackin & John Webb Supreme Court 1850 Jacob Smith vs. Jabez Felt et al Supreme Court 1852 Elizabeth Hinckley vs. Robert Porter & Nelson Clark Supreme Court 1852 John Steward Jr. vs Solon Peck et al Supreme Court 1852 Masterton Ure, et al vs. Allen S. Benson Supreme Court 1852 Hooper C. Prouty vs. Albany Schnectady RR Co. Supreme Court 1852 Erastus Crandall vs. John Van Allen et al Supreme Court 1853 Miranda Page vs. Marietta Peck et al Supreme Court 1853 Mary Smith et al vs. Electa Willett et al Supreme Court 1853 George W. Smith vs. William G. Wells Supreme Court 1853 John C. Strong vs. Aaron Lucas &J ohn S. Prouty Supreme Court 1853 Elijah Gregory vs. Alanson & Arnold Watkins Supreme Court 1853 George A. Gardner vs. Leman Garlinghouse Supreme Court 1853 John N. Whiting vs. Gideon D. Baggerly Supreme Court 1854 George Snyder vs. Selah Dickerson Supreme Court 1854 Hazaard A. Potter vs. John D. Stewart & Nelson Tunnicliffe Supreme Court 1854 William J. Lewis vs. Stephen Trickey Supreme Court 1855 Charles Webb vs. Henry Overman & Algernon Baxter Supreme Court 1855 Marvin Power vs. Jacob Ferguson Supreme Court 1855 Daniel Phelps vs. Clark Marlin et al Supreme Court 1855 Phinehas Prouty vs. David Barron et al Supreme Court 1855 John C. Lyon vs. Asahel & Sarah Gooding Supreme Court 1855 Frances Sutherland vs. Elizabeth Bannister Supreme Court 1855 Persis Baker for Jasper G. Baker, deceased Supreme Court 1855 Aaron Parmelee & David Wiggins vs. Selleck Dann Supreme Court 1855 Milo M. -
September 30, 2013
The Library of Virginia Quarterly Report of Newly-Available Archival Accessions July 1, 2013 – September 30, 2013 BIBLE RECORDS Barksdale-Baker Family. 5 leaves. Halifax County and Charlottesville, Virginia; and Alabama, Kentucky, New Jersey, and Texas, 1869–1942. Bible of Sallie Claiborne Barksdale Baker (1840–1916) and James Biscoe Baker (1834–1902). Bible printed in 1854. Other surnames mentioned: Dariotis, Rice, Smith, and Woodruff. Loaned for copying by Frederick W. Twyman III, Virginia Beach. (50900) Barksdale-Baker Family. 6 leaves. Halifax and Loudoun Counties, Virginia; and Alabama, New Jersey, and Texas, 1869–1936. Bible of James Biscoe Baker (1834–1902) and Sallie Claiborne Barksdale Baker (1840–1916). Includes Bible records (5 leaves) and an unidentified photograph of a young boy (1 leaf). Other surnames mentioned: Marceau, Rice, Smith, Twyman, and Woodruff. Loaned for copying by Frederick W. Twyman III, Virginia Beach. (50902) Barksdale-Baker Family. 1 leaf. Charlottesville, Virginia; and Alabama, New Jersey, and Texas, 1893–1936. Bible of Sallie Claiborne Barksdale Baker (1840–1916). Loaned for copying by Frederick W. Twyman III, Virginia Beach. (50903) Catlett Family. 4 leaves. Charlotte, Chesterfield, Fauquier, and Halifax Counties, and Lexington, Petersburg, Staunton, and Williamsburg, Virginia, 1823–1900. Bible of John Robert Catlett (1824–1861). Bible printed in 1848. Other surnames mentioned: Daniel, Henry, Swan, and Tutt. Gift of Anne Le Duc, Moorestown, New Jersey. (50939) Couger Family. 7 leaves, photocopies. Mississippi and Texas, 1873–1964. Bible of James Oscar Couger (d. 1914). Includes Bible records (6 leaves) and transcript (1 leaf) provided by donor. Other surnames mentioned: Caudill, Crabtree, Crawford, Logsdon, Riley, and Rogers. -
William Preston and the Revolutionary Settlement
Journal of Backcountry Studies EDITOR’S NOTE: This is the third and last installment of the author’s 1990 University of Maryland dissertation, directed by Professor Emory Evans, to be republished in JBS. Dr. Osborn is President of Pacific Union College. William Preston and the Revolutionary Settlement BY RICHARD OSBORN Patriot (1775-1778) Revolutions ultimately conclude with a large scale resolution in the major political, social, and economic issues raised by the upheaval. During the final two years of the American Revolution, William Preston struggled to anticipate and participate in the emerging American regime. For Preston, the American Revolution involved two challenges--Indians and Loyalists. The outcome of his struggles with both groups would help determine the results of the Revolution in Virginia. If Preston could keep the various Indian tribes subdued with minimal help from the rest of Virginia, then more Virginians would be free to join the American armies fighting the English. But if he was unsuccessful, Virginia would have to divert resources and manpower away from the broader colonial effort to its own protection. The other challenge represented an internal one. A large number of Loyalist neighbors continually tested Preston's abilities to forge a unified government on the frontier which could, in turn, challenge the Indians effectivel y and the British, if they brought the war to Virginia. In these struggles, he even had to prove he was a Patriot. Preston clearly placed his allegiance with the revolutionary movement when he joined with other freeholders from Fincastle County on January 20, 1775 to organize their local county committee in response to requests by the Continental Congress that such committees be established. -
Patrick Henry
LIBERTY UNIVERSITY PATRICK HENRY: THE SIGNIFICANCE OF HARMONIZED RELIGIOUS TENSIONS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE HISTORY DEPARTMENT IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN HISTORY BY KATIE MARGUERITE KITCHENS LYNCHBURG, VIRGINIA APRIL 1, 2010 Patrick Henry: The Significance of Harmonized Religious Tensions By Katie Marguerite Kitchens, MA Liberty University, 2010 SUPERVISOR: Samuel Smith This study explores the complex religious influences shaping Patrick Henry’s belief system. It is common knowledge that he was an Anglican, yet friendly and cooperative with Virginia Presbyterians. However, historians have yet to go beyond those general categories to the specific strains of Presbyterianism and Anglicanism which Henry uniquely harmonized into a unified belief system. Henry displayed a moderate, Latitudinarian, type of Anglicanism. Unlike many other Founders, his experiences with a specific strain of Presbyterianism confirmed and cooperated with these Anglican commitments. His Presbyterian influences could also be described as moderate, and latitudinarian in a more general sense. These religious strains worked to build a distinct religious outlook characterized by a respect for legitimate authority, whether civil, social, or religious. This study goes further to show the relevance of this distinct religious outlook for understanding Henry’s political stances. Henry’s sometimes seemingly erratic political principles cannot be understood in isolation from the wider context of his religious background. Uniquely harmonized -
Litigating the Lash: Quaker Emancipator Robert Pleasants, the Law
LITIGATING THE LASH: QUAKER EMANCIPATOR ROBERT PLEASANTS, THE LAW OF SLAVERY, AND THE MEANING OF MANUMISSION IN REVOLUTIONARY AND EARLY NATIONAL VIRGINIA By William Fernandez Hardin Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Vanderbilt University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in History May, 2013 Nashville, Tennessee Approved: Richard J.M. Blackett David L. Carlton Daniel J. Sharfstein Daniel H. Usner Copyright © by William Fernandez Hardin All Rights Reserved To Jessica, for loving a grumpy man, and to Ainsley, for making him less grumpy. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank the Virginia Historical Society and the John D. Rockefeller Jr. Library at Colonial Williamsburg for their support in the research of this dissertation—both collections proved invaluable and the staff helped a fledging graduate student navigate unfamiliar terrain. I would also like to thank the Folger Institute’s Center for the History of British Political Thought in Washington D.C. and my fellow participants in the “Changing Conceptions of Property” seminar for the opportunity to spend a summer discussing the relationship between English property law and colonial governance. I would also like to thank the Vanderbilt history department for its generous support. It has been a pleasure to learn the craft from such a distinguished group of historians. Professors Michael Bess, Bill Caferro, Katie Crawford, Dennis Dickerson, and Elizabeth Lunbeck, each—in vastly different ways—helped me discover new ways of considering the past and the people who lived there and I thank them for it. I would also like to thank the Vanderbilt Americanist Works-in-Progress Seminar for graciously allowing me to present my work and the invaluable comments and critiques provided. -
Cumberland County Comprehensive Plan 2013-2018
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2013-2018 Adopted: 13 August 2013 Prepared By: Commonwealth Regional Council www.virginiasheartland.org CUMBERLAND COUNTY OFFICIALS BOARD OF SUPERVISORS David Meinhard, District 4, Chairman Lloyd Banks, Jr, District 2, Vice-Chairman William F Osl, Jr, District 1 Kevin Ingle, District 3 Parker Wheeler, District 5 PLANNING COMMISSION William Burger, District 3, Chairman Patricia Pedrick, District 2, Vice-Chairman Randy Bryant, District 1 Hubert Allen, District 4 Roland Gilliam, District 5 Irene Wyatt, At-Large Larry Atkins, At-Large STAFF Vivian Giles, County Administrator/County Attorney Rachel Falkenstein, Planning Director TECHNICAL SUPPORT Commonwealth Regional Council TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 The Comprehensive Plan 1 Enabling Legislation 2 Developing a New Comprehensive Plan 2 Methods for Identifying Issues 3 Brief History of Cumberland County 4 Cumberland County Today 6 INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS 10 Introduction 10 Population 10 Education 17 Income 21 Economy 22 Housing Resources 29 Transportation 31 Physical Characteristics 58 Community Facilities and Services 63 CUMBERLAND COUNTY LAND USE PLAN 76 Introduction 76 Existing Land Use 77 Future Land Use 79 Land Use Categories 83 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 94 Introduction 94 Natural Resources 94 Agriculture 95 Land Use 96 Residential 97 Economic Development 98 Transportation 100 Community Facilities 101 APPENDIX I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN APPENDIX II SURVEY RESULTS SUMMARY APPENDIX III SUMMARY OF PUBLIC FORUMS APPENDIX IV MINUTES FROM MEETINGS/PUBLIC -
The Present Authors Gave a Sketch of Letitia Preston Floyd
Letitia Preston Floyd's "My Dear Rush" Letter Jim Glanville and Ryan Mays Copyright 2016 Introduction The present authors gave a sketch of Letitia Preston Floyd (1779- 1852) in the previous volume of the SmithfieldReview.! As background for the reader of this article, it may be brieflyreiterated that Letitia Preston Floyd was born on the Virginia frontier in the newly created Montgomery County. Her parents were the Scotch-Irish immigrant William Preston of Augusta County and Susanna Smith of Hanover County. In 1804 she married John Floyd in Kentucky and went on to become a plantation owner, the mother of twelve children (seven of whom survived to adulthood and marriage), and the First Lady of Virginia. The "My Dear Rush" letter is a 32-page manuscript writtenby Mrs. Floyd dated February 22, 1843. The authors of this article discovered the original copy of this document in January 2014 (after its being closely held within the Preston family for 161 years and ten furtheryears in a Smithfield closet) in a storage box at the Smithfield Plantation.2 The manuscript is in the form of a letter to her son Benjamin Rush Floyd and because of its opening salutation is referred to as the "My Dear Rush" letter. The letter was written at her home on the Cavan estate in Burke's Garden in Tazewell County, Virginia, at the instigation of the historian Lyman Draper. 3 The letter is in Mrs. Floyd's own hand and records many things that can be found nowhere else in the historical record. It is also a crucial document for understanding the European settling of southwest Virginia that was spearheaded by her great-uncle James Patton and her father William Preston. -
Antislavery Violence and Secession, October 1859
ANTISLAVERY VIOLENCE AND SECESSION, OCTOBER 1859 – APRIL 1861 by DAVID JONATHAN WHITE GEORGE C. RABLE, COMMITTEE CHAIR LAWRENCE F. KOHL KARI FREDERICKSON HAROLD SELESKY DIANNE BRAGG A DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History in the Graduate School of The University of Alabama TUSCALOOSA, ALABAMA 2017 Copyright David Jonathan White 2017 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the collapse of southern Unionism between October 1859 and April 1861. This study argues that a series of events of violent antislavery and southern perceptions of northern support for them caused white southerners to rethink the value of the Union and their place in it. John Brown’s raid at Harpers Ferry, Virginia, and northern expressions of personal support for Brown brought the Union into question in white southern eyes. White southerners were shocked when Republican governors in northern states acted to protect members of John Brown’s organization from prosecution in Virginia. Southern states invested large sums of money in their militia forces, and explored laws to control potentially dangerous populations such as northern travelling salesmen, whites “tampering” with slaves, and free African-Americans. Many Republicans endorsed a book by Hinton Rowan Helper which southerners believed encouraged antislavery violence and a Senate committee investigated whether an antislavery conspiracy had existed before Harpers Ferry. In the summer of 1860, a series of unexplained fires in Texas exacerbated white southern fear. As the presidential election approached in 1860, white southerners hoped for northern voters to repudiate the Republicans. When northern voters did not, white southerners generally rejected the Union. -
To Live and Die in Dixie: Robert E. Lee and Confederate Nationalism Jacob A
Western Kentucky University TopSCHOLAR® Honors College Capstone Experience/Thesis Honors College at WKU Projects 2010 To Live and Die in Dixie: Robert E. Lee and Confederate Nationalism Jacob A. Glover Western Kentucky University Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/stu_hon_theses Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Glover, Jacob A., "To Live and Die in Dixie: Robert E. Lee and Confederate Nationalism" (2010). Honors College Capstone Experience/ Thesis Projects. Paper 267. http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/stu_hon_theses/267 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by TopSCHOLAR®. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors College Capstone Experience/ Thesis Projects by an authorized administrator of TopSCHOLAR®. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Copyright by Jacob A. Glover 2010 ABSTRACT Robert E. Lee is undeniably one of the most revered figures in American history, and yet despite the adoration awarded to the man over the years, surprisingly little scholarly research has dedicated itself to an inquiry into his nationalistic leanings during the four most important years of his life—the Civil War. In fact, Lee was a dedicated Confederate nationalist during his time in service to the Confederacy, and he remained so for the rest of his life, even after his surrender at Appomattox and the taking of an oath to regain his United States citizenship. Lee identified strongly with a Southern view of antebellum events, and his time in the Confederate army hardened him to the notion that the only practical reason for waging the Civil War was the establishment of an independent Southern nation. -
Records of Ante-Bellum Southern Plantations from the Revolution Through the Civil War General Editor: Kenneth M
A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of Records of Ante-Bellum Southern Plantations from the Revolution through the Civil War General Editor: Kenneth M. Stampp Series M Selections from the Virginia Historical Society Part 6: Northern Virginia and Valley Associate Editor and Guide Compiled by Martin Schipper A microfilm project of UNIVERSITY PUBLICATIONS OF AMERICA An Imprint of CIS 4520 East-West Highway • Bethesda, MD 20814-3389 i Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Records of ante-bellum southern plantations from the Revolution through the Civil War [microform] Accompanied by printed reel guides, compiled by Martin Schipper. Contents: ser. A. Selections from the South Caroliniana Library, University of South Carolina (2 pts.)—[etc.]—ser. L. Selections from the Earl Gregg Swem Library, College of William and Mary—ser. M. Selections from the Virginia Historical Society. 1. Southern States—History—1775–1865—Sources. 2. Slave records—Southern States. 3. Plantation owners—Southern States—Archives. 4. Southern States— Genealogy. 5. Plantation life—Southern States— History—19th century—Sources. I. Stampp, Kenneth M. (Kenneth Milton) II. Boehm, Randolph. III. Schipper, Martin Paul. IV. South Caroliniana Library. V. South Carolina Historical Society. VI. Library of Congress. Manuscript Division. VII. Maryland Historical Society. [F213] 975 86-892341 ISBN 1-55655-562-8 (microfilm : ser. M, pt. 6) Compilation © 1997 by Virginia Historical Society. All rights reserved. ISBN 1-55655-562-8. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction........................................................................................................................... -
Union Calendar No. 237
1 Union Calendar No. 237 113TH CONGRESS " ! REPORT 1st Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 113–319 REPORT ON THE LEGISLATIVE AND OVERSIGHT ACTIVITIES OF THE COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS DURING THE 113TH CONGRESS JANUARY 2, 2014.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 39–006 WASHINGTON : 2014 VerDate Mar 15 2010 06:51 Jan 15, 2014 Jkt 039006 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4012 Sfmt 4012 E:\HR\OC\HR319.XXX HR319 smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS E:\Seals\Congress.#13 COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS ONE HUNDRED THIRTEENTH CONGRESS DAVE CAMP, Michigan, Chairman SAM JOHNSON, Texas SANDER M. LEVIN, Michigan KEVIN BRADY, Texas CHARLES B. RANGEL, New York PAUL RYAN, Wisconsin JIM MCDERMOTT, Washington DEVIN NUNES, California JOHN LEWIS, Georgia PATRICK J. TIBERI, Ohio RICHARD E. NEAL, Massachusetts DAVE G. REICHERT, Washington XAVIER BECERRA, California CHARLES BOUSTANY, Louisiana LLOYD DOGGETT, Texas PETER J. ROSKAM, Illinois MIKE THOMPSON, California JIM GERLACH, Pennsylvania JOHN B. LARSON, Connecticut TOM PRICE, Georgia EARL BLUMENAUER, Oregon VERN BUCHANAN, Florida RON KIND, Wisconsin ADRIAN SMITH, Nebraska BILL PASCRELL, JR., New Jersey AARON SCHOCK, Illinois JOSEPH CROWLEY, New York LYNN JENKINS, Kansas ALLYSON SCHWARTZ, Pennsylvania ERIK PAULSEN, Minnesota DANNY K. DAVIS, Illinois KENNY MARCHANT, Texas LINDA SA´ NCHEZ, California DIANE BLACK, Tennessee TOM REED, New York TODD YOUNG, Indiana MIKE KELLY, Pennsylvania TIM GRIFFIN, Arkansas JIM RENACCI, Ohio (II) VerDate Mar 15 2010 06:51 Jan 15, 2014 Jkt 039006 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 E:\HR\OC\HR319.XXX HR319 smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL U.S. -
![CHAIRMEN of SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–Present](https://docslib.b-cdn.net/cover/8733/chairmen-of-senate-standing-committees-table-5-3-1789-present-978733.webp)
CHAIRMEN of SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–Present
CHAIRMEN OF SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–present INTRODUCTION The following is a list of chairmen of all standing Senate committees, as well as the chairmen of select and joint committees that were precursors to Senate committees. (Other special and select committees of the twentieth century appear in Table 5-4.) Current standing committees are highlighted in yellow. The names of chairmen were taken from the Congressional Directory from 1816–1991. Four standing committees were founded before 1816. They were the Joint Committee on ENROLLED BILLS (established 1789), the joint Committee on the LIBRARY (established 1806), the Committee to AUDIT AND CONTROL THE CONTINGENT EXPENSES OF THE SENATE (established 1807), and the Committee on ENGROSSED BILLS (established 1810). The names of the chairmen of these committees for the years before 1816 were taken from the Annals of Congress. This list also enumerates the dates of establishment and termination of each committee. These dates were taken from Walter Stubbs, Congressional Committees, 1789–1982: A Checklist (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1985). There were eleven committees for which the dates of existence listed in Congressional Committees, 1789–1982 did not match the dates the committees were listed in the Congressional Directory. The committees are: ENGROSSED BILLS, ENROLLED BILLS, EXAMINE THE SEVERAL BRANCHES OF THE CIVIL SERVICE, Joint Committee on the LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, LIBRARY, PENSIONS, PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS, RETRENCHMENT, REVOLUTIONARY CLAIMS, ROADS AND CANALS, and the Select Committee to Revise the RULES of the Senate. For these committees, the dates are listed according to Congressional Committees, 1789– 1982, with a note next to the dates detailing the discrepancy.