University of Thessaly Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

University of Thessaly Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology University of Thessaly Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology Isolation of bacteria that degrade carbamate insecticides and characterization of the functional and ecological role of bacterial genes involved in their hydrolysis in soil A thesis submitted by Konstantina Rousidou For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2020 Institutional Repository - Library & Information Centre - University of Thessaly 07/10/2021 11:56:00 EEST - 170.106.33.180 Isolation of bacteria that degrade carbamate insecticides and characterization of the functional and ecological role of bacterial genes involved in their hydrolysis in soil 2 Institutional Repository - Library & Information Centre - University of Thessaly 07/10/2021 11:56:00 EEST - 170.106.33.180 Members of the Examination Committee • Professor D. G. Karpouzas (Environmental Microbiology and Biotechnology), Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology of University of Thessaly, Supervisor and Member of the Advisory Committee • Associate Professor K. Papadopoulou (Plant Biotechnology), Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology of University of Thessaly, Member of the Advisory Committee • Associate Professor G. Tsiamis (Environmental Microbiology), Department of Environmental Engineering of University of Patras. Member of the Advisory Committee • Professor C. Ehaliotis (Soil Fertility and Biology), Department of Natural Resources Management and Agricultural Engineering of Agricultural University of Athens • Dr. G. Nicol, Environmental Microbial Genomics Group, University of Lyon • Associate Professor S. Ntougias (Environmental Microbiology), Department of Environmental Engineering of Democritus University of Thrace • Professor T. Vogel, Environmental Microbial Genomics Group, University of Lyon 3 Institutional Repository - Library & Information Centre - University of Thessaly 07/10/2021 11:56:00 EEST - 170.106.33.180 Konstantina Rousidou Isolation of bacteria that degrade carbamate insecticides and characterization of the functional and ecological role of bacterial genes involved in their hydrolysis in soil 4 Institutional Repository - Library & Information Centre - University of Thessaly 07/10/2021 11:56:00 EEST - 170.106.33.180 To my family 5 Institutional Repository - Library & Information Centre - University of Thessaly 07/10/2021 11:56:00 EEST - 170.106.33.180 A Ship in Harbor Is Safe, But that Is Not What Ships Are Built For John A. Shedd 6 Institutional Repository - Library & Information Centre - University of Thessaly 07/10/2021 11:56:00 EEST - 170.106.33.180 Acknowledgements Firstly, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my supervisor, Professor Karpouzas Dimitrios, for his continuous support during my Ph.D. study and related research. I am grateful for his motivation, understanding and patience throughout this long walk with all its ‘’ups and downs’’. His scientific guidance helped me in all the time of research and writing of this thesis. I consider myself to be privileged to have been his student. I would, also, like to extend my gratitude to Associate Professor Papadopoulou Kalliope for taking the time to discuss and give helpful advice whenever needed. Her support has been of great importance to me. Additionally, I would like to thank Associate Professor Tsiamis George for serving as one of my advisory committee members. Furthermore, I would like to thank Professor Ehaliotis Constantinos (special thanks, also, for his encouragement when Ι needed it), Dr. Graeme Nicol, Associate Professor Ntougias Spyridon and Professor Vogel Timothy for accepting to be members of my examination committee. Thanks, should also go to people who have contributed in some parts of this work: M.Sc. Chanika Eleni, M.Sc. Georgiadou Dafne, M.Sc. Karaiskos Dionysis, M.Sc. Despoina Myti, M.Sc. Kolovos Panagiotis and Dr. Tourna Maria. I would, of course, like to thank the past and present lab members Dr. Papadopoulou Evangelia, Dr. Perruchon Chiara, Dr. Karas Panagiotis, Dr. Katsoula Athanasia, Dr. Vasileiadis Sotiris, Dr. Skiada Vasiliki, Assistant Professor Tsikou Daniela, Dr. Garagounis Constantine, Dr. Krokida Afrodite, Dr. Katsarou Dimitra and Dr. Stedel Catalina for our excellent cooperation and friendship all these years. Last but not least, I would like to thank my family for providing me with constant support and continuous encouragement throughout my years of study and through the process of researching and writing this thesis. 7 Institutional Repository - Library & Information Centre - University of Thessaly 07/10/2021 11:56:00 EEST - 170.106.33.180 Table of contents Acknowledgements ___________________________________________________ 6 Abstract ___________________________________________________________ 11 Περίληψη __________________________________________________________ 14 CHAPTER 1 General Introduction ___________________________________ 17 1.1 Pesticides And Pesticides Use ___________________________________ 18 1.2 Environmental Fate of Pesticides ________________________________ 19 1.2.1 Processes Responsible for the Accumulation of Pesticides in Soil: Adsorption- Desorption ___________________________________________________ 20 1.2.2 Processes Responsible for Pesticides Transportation in Soil _____________ 21 1.2.3 Processes Responsible for Pesticides Disappearance in Soil _____________ 23 1.3 Biodegradation of Pesticides in Soil ______________________________ 25 1.3.1 Microorganisms Involved in the Biodegradation of Pesticides ___________ 26 1.3.2 Microbial Adaptation to Pesticides _________________________________ 27 1.3.3 Mechanisms of Pesticide Biodegradation ____________________________ 29 1.3.4 Microbial Enzymes Involved in Pesticides Biodegradation ______________ 30 1.3.5 Factors Influencing the Biodegradation of Pesticides in Soils ____________ 32 1.4 Classification of Pesticides ______________________________________ 33 1.4.1 Classification by Mode of Action __________________________________ 34 1.4.2 Classification by Target Pest ______________________________________ 34 1.4.3 Classification by Chemical Structure _______________________________ 34 1.5 Main Insecticide Groups _______________________________________ 37 1.6 Carbamates __________________________________________________ 38 1.7 Carbamate Insecticides ________________________________________ 40 1.7.1 History and Classification of Carbamates Insecticides __________________ 40 1.7.2 Mode of Action and Toxicity _____________________________________ 41 1.7.3 Environmental Fate _____________________________________________ 42 1.7.4 Biodegradation ________________________________________________ 44 1.8 Oxamyl ______________________________________________________ 46 1.8.1 Physicochemical Properties and Uses _______________________________ 46 1.8.2 Environmental Fate _____________________________________________ 47 1.8.3 Biodegradation ________________________________________________ 50 1.8.4 Toxicity ______________________________________________________ 51 8 Institutional Repository - Library & Information Centre - University of Thessaly 07/10/2021 11:56:00 EEST - 170.106.33.180 1.9 Carbofuran __________________________________________________ 52 1.9.1 Physicochemical Properties and Uses _______________________________ 52 1.9.2 Environmental Fate _____________________________________________ 53 1.9.3 Biodegradation ________________________________________________ 54 1.9.4 Toxicity ______________________________________________________ 55 1.10 AIMS OF THE THESIS _______________________________________ 56 1.11 References ___________________________________________________ 57 CHAPTER 2 Isolation of oxamyl-degrading baceria and identification of cehA as a novel oxamyl hydrolase gene ______________________________________ 73 2.1 Introduction _________________________________________________ 74 2.2 Materials and Methods ________________________________________ 76 2.2.1 Pesticides and Media ____________________________________________ 76 2.2.2 Soil Microbial Degradation of Oxamyl and Oxamyl Oxime _____________ 76 2.2.3 Isolation of Oxamyl-degrading Bacteria _____________________________ 77 2.2.4 Phylogenetic Classification of the Oxamyl-degrading Bacteria ___________ 77 2.2.5 Growth Kinetics and Oxamyl Degradation ___________________________ 80 2.2.6 Mineralization of 14C-labelled Oxamyl by the Oxamyl-degrading Bacteria _ 80 2.2.7 Degradation of Other Pesticides by the Oxamyl-degrading Bacterium OXA20 ____________________________________________________________ 81 2.2.8 Detection and Isolation of a Carbamate-Hydrolase Gene ________________ 81 2.2.9 Transcription Analysis of the cehA Gene in Oxamyl-degrading Bacteria ___ 84 2.2.10 Utilization of Methylamine by Oxamyl-degrading Isolates ______________ 85 2.2.11 Pesticides Analysis _____________________________________________ 85 2.3 Results ______________________________________________________ 86 2.3.1 Degradation of Oxamyl and Oxamyl Oxime in Soil and Enrichment Cultures ____________________________________________________________ 86 2.3.2 Isolation and Phylogenetic Classification of the Oxamyl-degrading Isolates 89 2.3.3 Growth Kinetics and Hydrolysis of Oxamyl __________________________ 89 2.3.4 Mineralization of 14C-labelled Oxamyl by the Isolated Bacteria __________ 92 2.3.5 Degradation of Other Pesticides by the Oxamyl-degrading Strain OXA20 __ 94 2.3.6 Detection of a Carbamate-Hydrolase Gene in the Oxamyl-degrading Bacteria _____________________________________________________ 95 2.3.7 Transcription Analysis of the cehA Gene in Oxamyl-degrading Bacteria
Recommended publications
  • Chemical Name Federal P Code CAS Registry Number Acutely
    Acutely / Extremely Hazardous Waste List Federal P CAS Registry Acutely / Extremely Chemical Name Code Number Hazardous 4,7-Methano-1H-indene, 1,4,5,6,7,8,8-heptachloro-3a,4,7,7a-tetrahydro- P059 76-44-8 Acutely Hazardous 6,9-Methano-2,4,3-benzodioxathiepin, 6,7,8,9,10,10- hexachloro-1,5,5a,6,9,9a-hexahydro-, 3-oxide P050 115-29-7 Acutely Hazardous Methanimidamide, N,N-dimethyl-N'-[2-methyl-4-[[(methylamino)carbonyl]oxy]phenyl]- P197 17702-57-7 Acutely Hazardous 1-(o-Chlorophenyl)thiourea P026 5344-82-1 Acutely Hazardous 1-(o-Chlorophenyl)thiourea 5344-82-1 Extremely Hazardous 1,1,1-Trichloro-2, -bis(p-methoxyphenyl)ethane Extremely Hazardous 1,1a,2,2,3,3a,4,5,5,5a,5b,6-Dodecachlorooctahydro-1,3,4-metheno-1H-cyclobuta (cd) pentalene, Dechlorane Extremely Hazardous 1,1a,3,3a,4,5,5,5a,5b,6-Decachloro--octahydro-1,2,4-metheno-2H-cyclobuta (cd) pentalen-2- one, chlorecone Extremely Hazardous 1,1-Dimethylhydrazine 57-14-7 Extremely Hazardous 1,2,3,4,10,10-Hexachloro-6,7-epoxy-1,4,4,4a,5,6,7,8,8a-octahydro-1,4-endo-endo-5,8- dimethanonaph-thalene Extremely Hazardous 1,2,3-Propanetriol, trinitrate P081 55-63-0 Acutely Hazardous 1,2,3-Propanetriol, trinitrate 55-63-0 Extremely Hazardous 1,2,4,5,6,7,8,8-Octachloro-4,7-methano-3a,4,7,7a-tetra- hydro- indane Extremely Hazardous 1,2-Benzenediol, 4-[1-hydroxy-2-(methylamino)ethyl]- 51-43-4 Extremely Hazardous 1,2-Benzenediol, 4-[1-hydroxy-2-(methylamino)ethyl]-, P042 51-43-4 Acutely Hazardous 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 96-12-8 Extremely Hazardous 1,2-Propylenimine P067 75-55-8 Acutely Hazardous 1,2-Propylenimine 75-55-8 Extremely Hazardous 1,3,4,5,6,7,8,8-Octachloro-1,3,3a,4,7,7a-hexahydro-4,7-methanoisobenzofuran Extremely Hazardous 1,3-Dithiolane-2-carboxaldehyde, 2,4-dimethyl-, O- [(methylamino)-carbonyl]oxime 26419-73-8 Extremely Hazardous 1,3-Dithiolane-2-carboxaldehyde, 2,4-dimethyl-, O- [(methylamino)-carbonyl]oxime.
    [Show full text]
  • The List of Extremely Hazardous Substances)
    APPENDIX A (THE LIST OF EXTREMELY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES) THRESHOLD REPORTABLE INVENTORY RELEASE QUANTITY QUANTITY CAS NUMBER CHEMICAL NAME (POUNDS) (POUNDS) 75-86-5 ACETONE CYANOHYDRIN 500 10 1752-30-3 ACETONE THIOSEMICARBAZIDE 500/500 1,000 107-02-8 ACROLEIN 500 1 79-06-1 ACRYLAMIDE 500/500 5,000 107-13-1 ACRYLONITRILE 500 100 814-68-6 ACRYLYL CHLORIDE 100 100 111-69-3 ADIPONITRILE 500 1,000 116-06-3 ALDICARB 100/500 1 309-00-2 ALDRIN 500/500 1 107-18-6 ALLYL ALCOHOL 500 100 107-11-9 ALLYLAMINE 500 500 20859-73-8 ALUMINUM PHOSPHIDE 500 100 54-62-6 AMINOPTERIN 500/500 500 78-53-5 AMITON 500 500 3734-97-2 AMITON OXALATE 100/500 100 7664-41-7 AMMONIA 500 100 300-62-9 AMPHETAMINE 500 1,000 62-53-3 ANILINE 500 5,000 88-05-1 ANILINE,2,4,6-TRIMETHYL- 500 500 7783-70-2 ANTIMONY PENTAFLUORIDE 500 500 1397-94-0 ANTIMYCIN A 500/500 1,000 86-88-4 ANTU 500/500 100 1303-28-2 ARSENIC PENTOXIDE 100/500 1 THRESHOLD REPORTABLE INVENTORY RELEASE QUANTITY QUANTITY CAS NUMBER CHEMICAL NAME (POUNDS) (POUNDS) 1327-53-3 ARSENOUS OXIDE 100/500 1 7784-34-1 ARSENOUS TRICHLORIDE 500 1 7784-42-1 ARSINE 100 100 2642-71-9 AZINPHOS-ETHYL 100/500 100 86-50-0 AZINPHOS-METHYL 10/500 1 98-87-3 BENZAL CHLORIDE 500 5,000 98-16-8 BENZENAMINE, 3-(TRIFLUOROMETHYL)- 500 500 100-14-1 BENZENE, 1-(CHLOROMETHYL)-4-NITRO- 500/500 500 98-05-5 BENZENEARSONIC ACID 10/500 10 3615-21-2 BENZIMIDAZOLE, 4,5-DICHLORO-2-(TRI- 500/500 500 FLUOROMETHYL)- 98-07-7 BENZOTRICHLORIDE 100 10 100-44-7 BENZYL CHLORIDE 500 100 140-29-4 BENZYL CYANIDE 500 500 15271-41-7 BICYCLO[2.2.1]HEPTANE-2-CARBONITRILE,5-
    [Show full text]
  • Code Chemical P026 1-(O-Chlorophenyl)Thiourea P081 1
    Code Chemical P026 1-(o-Chlorophenyl)thiourea P081 1,2,3-Propanetriol, trinitrate (R) P042 1,2-Benzenediol, 4-[1-hydroxy-2-(methylamino)ethyl]-, (R)- P067 1,2-Propylenimine P185 1,3-Dithiolane-2-carboxaldehyde, 2,4-dimethyl-, O- [(methylamino)- carbonyl]oxime 1,4,5,8-Dimethanonaphthalene, 1,2,3,4,10,10-hexa- chloro-1,4,4a,5,8,8a,-hexahydro-, P004 (1alpha,4alpha, 4abeta,5alpha,8alpha,8abeta)- 1,4,5,8-Dimethanonaphthalene, 1,2,3,4,10,10-hexa- chloro-1,4,4a,5,8,8a-hexahydro-, P060 (1alpha,4alpha, 4abeta,5beta,8beta,8abeta)- P002 1-Acetyl-2-thiourea P048 2,4-Dinitrophenol P051 2,7:3,6-Dimethanonaphth [2,3-b]oxirene, 3,4,5,6,9,9 -hexachloro-1a,2,2a,3,6,6a,7,7a- octahydro-, (1aalpha,2beta,2abeta,3alpha,6alpha,6abeta,7 beta, 7aalpha)-, & metabolites 2,7:3,6-Dimethanonaphth[2,3-b]oxirene, 3,4,5,6,9,9- hexachloro-1a,2,2a,3,6,6a,7,7a- P037 octahydro-, (1aalpha,2beta,2aalpha,3beta,6beta,6aalpha,7 beta, 7aalpha)- P045 2-Butanone, 3,3-dimethyl-1-(methylthio)-, O-[methylamino)carbonyl] oxime P034 2-Cyclohexyl-4,6-dinitrophenol 2H-1-Benzopyran-2-one, 4-hydroxy-3-(3-oxo-1- phenylbutyl)-, & salts, when present at P001 concentrations greater than 0.3% P069 2-Methyllactonitrile P017 2-Propanone, 1-bromo- P005 2-Propen-1-ol P003 2-Propenal P102 2-Propyn-1-ol P007 3(2H)-Isoxazolone, 5-(aminomethyl)- P027 3-Chloropropionitrile P047 4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol, & salts P059 4,7-Methano-1H-indene, 1,4,5,6,7,8,8-heptachloro- 3a,4,7,7a-tetrahydro- P008 4-Aminopyridine P008 4-Pyridinamine P007 5-(Aminomethyl)-3-isoxazolol 6,9-Methano-2,4,3-benzodioxathiepin, 6,7,8,9,10,10-
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Advances on Detection of Insecticides Using Optical Sensors
    sensors Review Recent Advances on Detection of Insecticides Using Optical Sensors Nurul Illya Muhamad Fauzi 1, Yap Wing Fen 1,2,*, Nur Alia Sheh Omar 1,2 and Hazwani Suhaila Hashim 2 1 Functional Devices Laboratory, Institute of Advanced Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia; [email protected] (N.I.M.F.); [email protected] (N.A.S.O.) 2 Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Insecticides are enormously important to industry requirements and market demands in agriculture. Despite their usefulness, these insecticides can pose a dangerous risk to the safety of food, environment and all living things through various mechanisms of action. Concern about the environmental impact of repeated use of insecticides has prompted many researchers to develop rapid, economical, uncomplicated and user-friendly analytical method for the detection of insecticides. In this regards, optical sensors are considered as favorable methods for insecticides analysis because of their special features including rapid detection time, low cost, easy to use and high selectivity and sensitivity. In this review, current progresses of incorporation between recognition elements and optical sensors for insecticide detection are discussed and evaluated well, by categorizing it based on insecticide chemical classes, including the range of detection and limit of detection. Additionally, this review aims to provide powerful insights to researchers for the future development of optical sensors in the detection of insecticides. Citation: Fauzi, N.I.M.; Fen, Y.W.; Omar, N.A.S.; Hashim, H.S. Recent Keywords: insecticides; optical sensor; recognition element Advances on Detection of Insecticides Using Optical Sensors.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Extremely Hazardous Substances
    Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Facility Reporting Compliance Manual List of Extremely Hazardous Substances Threshold Threshold Quantity (TQ) Reportable Planning (pounds) Quantity Quantity (Industry Use (pounds) (pounds) CAS # Chemical Name Only) (Spill/Release) (LEPC Use Only) 75-86-5 Acetone Cyanohydrin 500 10 1,000 1752-30-3 Acetone Thiosemicarbazide 500/500 1,000 1,000/10,000 107-02-8 Acrolein 500 1 500 79-06-1 Acrylamide 500/500 5,000 1,000/10,000 107-13-1 Acrylonitrile 500 100 10,000 814-68-6 Acrylyl Chloride 100 100 100 111-69-3 Adiponitrile 500 1,000 1,000 116-06-3 Aldicarb 100/500 1 100/10,000 309-00-2 Aldrin 500/500 1 500/10,000 107-18-6 Allyl Alcohol 500 100 1,000 107-11-9 Allylamine 500 500 500 20859-73-8 Aluminum Phosphide 500 100 500 54-62-6 Aminopterin 500/500 500 500/10,000 78-53-5 Amiton 500 500 500 3734-97-2 Amiton Oxalate 100/500 100 100/10,000 7664-41-7 Ammonia 500 100 500 300-62-9 Amphetamine 500 1,000 1,000 62-53-3 Aniline 500 5,000 1,000 88-05-1 Aniline, 2,4,6-trimethyl- 500 500 500 7783-70-2 Antimony pentafluoride 500 500 500 1397-94-0 Antimycin A 500/500 1,000 1,000/10,000 86-88-4 ANTU 500/500 100 500/10,000 1303-28-2 Arsenic pentoxide 100/500 1 100/10,000 1327-53-3 Arsenous oxide 100/500 1 100/10,000 7784-34-1 Arsenous trichloride 500 1 500 7784-42-1 Arsine 100 100 100 2642-71-9 Azinphos-Ethyl 100/500 100 100/10,000 86-50-0 Azinphos-Methyl 10/500 1 10/10,000 98-87-3 Benzal Chloride 500 5,000 500 98-16-8 Benzenamine, 3-(trifluoromethyl)- 500 500 500 100-14-1 Benzene, 1-(chloromethyl)-4-nitro- 500/500
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Classification of Pesticides by Hazard and Guidelines to Classification 2019 Theinternational Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) Was Established in 1980
    The WHO Recommended Classi cation of Pesticides by Hazard and Guidelines to Classi cation 2019 cation Hazard of Pesticides by and Guidelines to Classi The WHO Recommended Classi The WHO Recommended Classi cation of Pesticides by Hazard and Guidelines to Classi cation 2019 The WHO Recommended Classification of Pesticides by Hazard and Guidelines to Classification 2019 TheInternational Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) was established in 1980. The overall objectives of the IPCS are to establish the scientific basis for assessment of the risk to human health and the environment from exposure to chemicals, through international peer review processes, as a prerequisite for the promotion of chemical safety, and to provide technical assistance in strengthening national capacities for the sound management of chemicals. This publication was developed in the IOMC context. The contents do not necessarily reflect the views or stated policies of individual IOMC Participating Organizations. The Inter-Organization Programme for the Sound Management of Chemicals (IOMC) was established in 1995 following recommendations made by the 1992 UN Conference on Environment and Development to strengthen cooperation and increase international coordination in the field of chemical safety. The Participating Organizations are: FAO, ILO, UNDP, UNEP, UNIDO, UNITAR, WHO, World Bank and OECD. The purpose of the IOMC is to promote coordination of the policies and activities pursued by the Participating Organizations, jointly or separately, to achieve the sound management of chemicals in relation to human health and the environment. WHO recommended classification of pesticides by hazard and guidelines to classification, 2019 edition ISBN 978-92-4-000566-2 (electronic version) ISBN 978-92-4-000567-9 (print version) ISSN 1684-1042 © World Health Organization 2020 Some rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Summary (Pdf)
    United States Department of Agriculture December 2015 Dear Reader: We are pleased to present the Pesticide Data Program’s (PDP) 24th Annual Summary for calendar year 2014. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS), conducts this program each year to collect data on pesticide residues in food. This report shows that overall pesticide residues found in foods are at levels below the tolerances set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The PDP provides reliable data that help assure consumers that the food they feed their families is safe. Over 99 percent of the products sampled through PDP had residues below the EPA tolerances. Ultimately, if EPA determines a pesticide is not safe for our families, it is removed from the market. This system of checks and balances provides Americans with the safest food supply in the world. The PDP tests a wide variety of domestic and imported foods using a sound statistical program and the most current laboratory methods. The EPA uses the PDP data when looking at dietary pesticide exposure, a critical step to verify that all sources of exposure to pesticides meet U.S. safety standards. The PDP is not designed for enforcement of EPA pesticide residue tolerances. Rather, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is responsible for enforcing EPA tolerances. PDP provides FDA and EPA with monthly reports of pesticide residue testing and informs the FDA if residues detected exceed the EPA tolerance or have no EPA tolerance established. In instances where a PDP finding is extraordinary and may pose a safety risk, FDA and EPA are notified immediately.
    [Show full text]
  • Diretrizes Brasileiras Para Tratamento De Intoxicações Por Agrotóxicos
    Diretrizes Brasileiras para Diagnóstico e Tratamento de Intoxicações por Agrotóxicos - Capítulo 1 Nº 387 Agosto/2018 1 2018 Ministério da Saúde. É permitida a reprodução parcial ou total desta obra, desde que citada a fonte e que não seja para venda ou qualquer fim comercial. A responsabilidade pelos direitos autorais de textos e imagens desta obra é da CONITEC. Informações: MINISTÉRIO DA SAÚDE Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia e Insumos Estratégicos Esplanada dos Ministérios, Bloco G, Edifício Sede, 8° andar CEP: 70058-900, Brasília – DF E-mail: [email protected] http://conitec.gov.br 2 CONTEXTO Em 28 de abril de 2011, foi publicada a Lei n° 12.401, que altera diretamente a Lei nº 8.080 de 1990 dispondo sobre a assistência terapêutica e a incorporação de tecnologias em saúde no âmbito do SUS. Esta lei define que o Ministério da Saúde, assessorado pela Comissão Nacional de Incorporação de Tecnologias – CONITEC, tem como atribuição incorporar, excluir ou alterar o uso de tecnologias em saúde, tais como medicamentos, produtos e procedimentos, bem como a constituição ou alteração de Protocolos Clínicos e Diretrizes Terapêuticas. Os Protocolos Clínicos e DiretrizesTerapêuticas (PCDT) são os documentos oficiais do SUS para estabelecer os critérios para o diagnóstico de uma doença ou agravo à saúde; o tratamento preconizado, com os medicamentos e demais produtos apropriados, quando couber; as posologias recomendadas; os mecanismos de controle clínico; e o acompanhamento e a verificação dos resultados terapêuticos a serem seguidos pelos gestores do SUS. O objetivo de um PCDT é garantir o melhor cuidado de saúde possível diante do contexto brasileiro e dos recursos disponíveis no Sistema Único de Saúde, de forma a garantir sua sustentabilidade.
    [Show full text]
  • Strong Base Pre-Treatment for Colorimetric Sensor Array Detection and Identification of N-Methyl Carbamate Pesticides†
    Strong base pre-treatment for colorimetric sensor array detection and identification of N-methyl carbamate pesticides† Sihua Qian,a Yumin Lengab and Hengwei Lin*a Colorimetric sensor arrays demonstrate numerous superior features in chemo- and bio-sensing, but they are generally not applicable to less-reactive analytes. Based on the findings that N-methyl carbamate pesticides could be decomposed into reactive phenols in basic media, herein, a novel strategy of strong base pre-treatment was developed and employed for the colorimetric sensor array detection and differentiation of the N-methyl carbamate pesticides in an indirect manner. With the use of five inexpensive and commercially available phenol responsive indicators, such a colorimetric sensor array can be facilely fabricated. Classification analysis (e.g. hierarchical clustering analysis (HCA) and principal component analysis (PCA)) reveals that the as-fabricated sensor array has an extremely high dimensionality and, consequently, exhibits excellence in discriminating a variety of N-methyl carbamates from other types of pesticides and potential interferants, and further identifying them exactly from each other. Moreover, semi-quantitative detection could also be achieved through combining HCA/PCA, recognition patterns, and corresponding fitting curves. Overall, the as-developed method exhibits high selectivity and sensitivity, good anti-interference, simultaneous detection and identification capability for each of the N-methyl carbamate pesticides, and potential applicability in real samples. Most importantly, this study demonstrates that pre-treatment strategies are very effective in expanding the range of applications of colorimetric sensor array methodology to less-reactive analytes. Introduction In the past decades, a wealth of techniques have been developed for the assay of pesticides in food and water, such as The use of pesticides plays a critical role in improving crop yield liquid/gas chromatography,3 chromatography and mass spec- in modern agriculture.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantification and Confirmation of Fifteen Carbamate Pesticide
    molecules Article Quantification and Confirmation of Fifteen Carbamate Pesticide Residues by Multiple Reaction Monitoring and Enhanced Product Ion Scan Modes via LC-MS/MS QTRAP System Ying Zhou, Jian Guan, Weiwei Gao, Shencong Lv and Miaohua Ge * Jiaxing Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhejiang 314050, China; [email protected] (Y.Z.); [email protected] (J.G.); [email protected] (W.G.); [email protected] (S.L.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-0573-83683808 Academic Editor: Alessandra Gentili Received: 29 August 2018; Accepted: 27 September 2018; Published: 29 September 2018 Abstract: In this research, fifteen carbamate pesticide residues were systematically analyzed by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography–quadrupole-linear ion trap mass spectrometry on a QTRAP 5500 system in both multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) and enhanced product ion (EPI) scan modes. The carbamate pesticide residues were extracted from a variety of samples by QuEChERS method and separated by a popular reverse phase column (Waters BEH C18). Except for the current conformation criteria including selected ion pairs, retention time and relative intensities from MRM scan mode, the presence of carbamate pesticide residues in diverse samples, especially some doubtful cases, could also be confirmed by the matching of carbamate pesticide spectra via EPI scan mode. Moreover, the fragmentation routes of fifteen carbamates were firstly explained based on the mass spectra obtained by a QTRAP system; the characteristic fragment ion from a neutral loss of CH3NCO (−57 Da) could be observed. The limits of detection and quantification for fifteen carbamates were 0.2–2.0 µg kg−1 and 0.5–5.0 µg kg−1, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Particularly Hazardous Substances (Phs)
    PARTICULARLY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES (PHS) This list contains examples of chemicals that may be used at the University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC). The list is not all-inclusive. This lists contains examples of Particularly Hazardous Substances (PHS) which are a special subset of OSHA Hazardous Chemicals. PHS include chemicals that are known or suspect carcinogens, reproductive toxins, and/or highly toxic materials. Before working with any PHS, please determine if you have any of these and evaluate if additional protective work practices are needed. You should utilize the PHS Assessment Form to help in this evaluation. Abbreviations Used in List Headings CARC NTP National Toxicology Program listed carcinogen - National Toxicology Program K = known carcinogen S = suspect carcinogen CARC IARC International Association for Research on Cancer listed carcinogen - IARC 1= known human carcinogen 2A = probable human carcinogen 2B = possible human carcinogen CARC OSHA OSHA regulated carcinogen - OSHA-regulated carcinogens X = regulated carcinogen REPRO SHEP Included in Catalog of Teratogenic Agents, T.H. Shepard, 6th Edition, Johns Hopkins Press, 1989 X = listed teratogen REPRO CALIF Listed by the State of California ‘Safe Drinking Water Act, 1986’ http://www.oehha.ca.gov/prop65/prop65_list/Newlist.html F = female reproductive hazard M = male reproductive hazard HTX Highly toxic, included in EPA’s list ‘Acutely Toxic Hazardous Waste’, P-listed waste 40 CFR 261.33, or Included in OSHA’s list of highly hazardous chemicals with a threshold £200
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Protection Agency Pt. 355, App. B
    Environmental Protection Agency Pt. 355, App. B [Alphabetical Order] Reportable Threshold plan- CAS No. Chemical name Notes quantity * ning quantity (pounds) (pounds) 5344–82–1 ............ Thiourea, (2-Chlorophenyl)- ....................................... ..................... 100 100/10,000 614–78–8 .............. Thiourea, (2-Methylphenyl)- ....................................... ..................... 500 500/10,000 7550–45–0 ............ Titanium Tetrachloride ................................................ ..................... 1,000 100 584–84–9 .............. Toluene 2,4-Diisocyanate ........................................... ..................... 100 500 91–08–7 ................ Toluene 2,6-Diisocyanate ........................................... ..................... 100 100 110–57–6 .............. Trans-1,4-Dichlorobutene ........................................... ..................... 500 500 1031–47–6 ............ Triamiphos .................................................................. ..................... 500 500/10,000 24017–47–8 .......... Triazofos ..................................................................... ..................... 500 500 76–02–8 ................ Trichloroacetyl Chloride .............................................. ..................... 500 500 115–21–9 .............. Trichloroethylsilane ..................................................... d .................. 500 500 327–98–0 .............. Trichloronate ............................................................... e .................
    [Show full text]