DOCSLIB.ORG

21.5 326-329 Books & Arts MH AB NEW.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
21.5 326-329 Books & Arts MH AB NEW.Indd Vol 459|21 May 2009 BOOKS & ARTS Paul Dirac: a physicist of few words A detailed biography argues that the Nobel prizewinner’s notorious reticence delayed experimentalists from discovering the antimatter that would confirm his elegant theory, explains Frank Close. The Strangest Man: The Hidden Life of Paul Dirac by Graham Farmelo Faber & Faber: 2009. 560 pp. £22.50 BETTMANN/CORBIS Among scientists, Paul Dirac is widely regarded as being in the same league as Albert Einstein. In London’s Westminster Abbey, Dirac’s epony- mous equation describing the quantum behav- iour of electrons is set in stone. But in his home town of Bristol, UK, his reputation is overshad- owed by that of his fellow student at the Bishop Road School, Archie Leach — better known as the film star Cary Grant. On asking the Bristol Record Office for material about Dirac for his new book, author Graham Farmelo received the response: “Who?” Danish physicist Niels Bohr described Dirac as “the strangest man”. His extreme reticence, monosyllabic responses and repetitious state- ments are legendary. Six years elapsed before even close colleagues learned any of P. A. M. Paul Dirac predicted the anti-electron’s existence, but did little to encourage others to hunt for it. Dirac’s forenames. When he came up with the equations of quantum mechanics, his weekly a sensation once people began to understand at the University of Cambridge, UK, showing postcard home merely said, “Not much to its unusual structure. However, it contained Anderson’s images of particle tracks from report here.” After solving a decades-old prob- puzzling solutions in which the electron had cosmic rays — including some that looked like lem by creating Fermi–Dirac statistics later negative energy. Dirac proposed that a vacuum those of electrons but which curved the wrong that year, the news once more was: “Not much is filled with a sea of negative-energy electrons. way in a magnetic field. No one associated these to report.” When he arrived at the relativistic Any hole in this vacuum would appear as a tracks with Dirac’s holes. quantum equation that describes the elec- positively charged, positive-energy particle. By 1932, the holes had become a joke. At a tron, he didn’t even send a postcard. Even his At first, he thought that this particle was the meeting in Copenhagen, when Bohr lost his colleagues were unaware of it. proton, until J. Robert Oppenheimer pointed patience and confronted Dirac with: “Do you In this elegantly written biography, Far- out that if this were so, the electron and proton believe all that stuff?”, he simply replied, “I melo’s meticulous research sheds considerable could destroy each other and matter would be don’t think anyone has put a conclusive argu- light on Dirac’s personality and the circum- unstable. Wolfgang Pauli was equally scepti- ment against it.” Dirac no longer seemed to stances behind it. Several members of Dirac’s cal, remarking that anyone making a theory be strongly committed to the anti-electron; extended family developed acute depression, of matter should first apply it to the atoms of the absence of the particle was, Farmelo says, six committing suicide within a century, their own body. Pauli went on to prove that the “sapping his morale”. He even told Werner including his brother. His father was cold and positive particle must have the same mass as an Heisenberg that he had ceased to believe in it. authoritarian, his mother overweening — the electron, which was worrying because experi- On 2 August 1932, Anderson found his first description of her excruciating behaviour at menters had not found any such particle. With clear single particle trail, now hailed in text- the Nobel prize ceremony, haranguing journa- the debate unresolved, many began to wonder books as the ‘discovery of the positron’. This lists and officials on behalf of her idolized son, if Dirac’s equation might be wrong. realization was far from clear cut, however. In a is pure entertainment. Dirac immersed him- In 1931, Dirac referred for the first time to the series of missed opportunities, no one seemed self in mathematics. ‘anti-electron’, remarking that it could not occur able to put two and two together to link Dirac’s The received wisdom is that in producing his in nature owing to its immediate destruction by holes and Anderson’s ‘positron’. equation for the electron, Dirac ‘discovered’ the ubiquitous electrons. Although he commented Anderson published his positron paper in concept of antimatter in 1928, and four years that it could be made transiently in experiments, September 1932 in the journal Science. But later, Carl Anderson’s discovery of the positron he was surprisingly circumspect, more con- remarkably, no one in Cambridge seemed to in cosmic rays validated Dirac’s idea. But in cerned with the difficulties of detection than the have read it. By that autumn, British physicist Farmelo’s account the reality is rather different. inevitability of its existence. He made no sugges- Patrick Blackett had his own images of posi- Dirac’s electron equation — declared “ach- tion as to how experimentalists might make it, trons, and had even shown them in a talk with ingly beautiful” by physicist Frank Wilczek — or recognize it. He was away in the United States Dirac and Soviet physicist Peter Kapitsa in the described the spin of the electron, and caused later that year when Robert Millikan gave a talk audience. Dirac stayed silent. Kapitsa exclaimed 326 © 2009 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved NATURE|Vol 459|21 May 2009 OPINION “Now, Dirac, put that into your theory! Positive electrons, eh!” Farmelo comments that Kapitsa The end of the invasion? “had spent hours talking with Dirac but had evi- dently not even heard of the anti-electron” and Invasion Biology foothold only by finding a vacant niche or by that Dirac simply replied “Positive electrons by Mark A. Davis throwing out another species. have been in the theory for a very long time”. Yet Oxford University Press: 2009. 288 pp. $55 Niche theory gives rise to the diversity- there is no sense that Dirac was claiming any- invasibility hypothesis, which posits that the thing, apparently convinced that the positive Ascension Island in the South Atlantic Ocean more species there are in an ecosystem, the trails in the pictures were “a mirage”. Farmelo is a good example of the changes that invasive more niches will be filled and the harder it will sees Dirac as exhibiting “reticence taken to species can wreak. Its volcanic mountain tops be for a new species to become established. the point of perversity”. His colleagues so mis- once hosted a monotonous carpet of ferns. But But the evidence does not bear this out. trusted his abstract theory that they could not in 1843, botanist Joseph Hooker recommended Many studies have failed to find any strong accept that it predicted new particles. that the bleak island be wooded by importing relationship between how diverse a place is The first link between hole theory and the many new plants — what modern ecologists and how easy it is to invade. Davis concludes positron came from Blackett, who showed would see as a massive, human-mediated bio- that, despite its appeal and its “implicit affir- sensational images of electron–positron pair logical invasion. Surprisingly, this resulted not mation of the value of diversity”, the hypothesis creation at a meeting at the Royal Society in in ecological meltdown, but in the creation of a is not true. In fact, the opposite may hold. In London, saying that they “fit extraordinarily lush cloud forest. The forest traps mists, cycles any ecosystem, each individual plant or animal well with Dirac’s hole theory”. Immediately nutrients and survives, generation after genera- has to get a foothold, irrespective of its origin. afterwards, journalists rushed to interview tion, without its species having evolved together. A seed does not care whether it is exotic or native him. Meanwhile Dirac, who was lecturing in A study of this anomalous system is cited in when it lands on the ground, and neither do the another room in the same building, was “una- Mark Davis’s new book Invasion Biology. Why? surrounding species. The key insight is that vailable for comment”. Maybe because it is not so anomalous. there is nothing fundamentally different about According to Farmelo, Dirac later realized Invasion Biology starts out as a graduate-level exotics other than where they came from. that he held responsibility for not having advo- text on how organisms brought cated that experimentalists should hunt for far from their homes by humans positrons, nor advising on how to detect them. can flourish, often at the expense Had he done so, the positron could have been of native species in the places they discovered “in a single afternoon”, as Ander- ‘invade’. But on turning the pages, son put it. When asked later why he did not the book reveals itself to be an K. SCHAFER/ALAMY speak out and predict the positron, Dirac said, iconoclastic argument that much “pure cowardice”. of the field’s conventional wisdom Nonetheless, Dirac on other occasions is wrong, that biologists are more believed that he had predicted it, although not swayed by their emotions about every one agreed. Blackett said: “Dirac nearly invasive species than they care to but not quite predicted the positron.” So much admit, and that invasion biology as for history; today, Dirac’s role in foreseeing the a field should be disbanded. Davis positron, and the mirror world of antimatter, writes, “This may be the first time was, as Farmelo describes it, “one of the greatest that an author has concluded a Ascension Island: not all imported species are destructive.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rutherford's Nuclear World: the Story of the Discovery of the Nuc
    Rutherford's Nuclear World: The Story of the Discovery of the Nuc... http://www.aip.org/history/exhibits/rutherford/sections/atop-physic... HOME SECTIONS CREDITS EXHIBIT HALL ABOUT US rutherford's explore the atom learn more more history of learn about aip's nuclear world with rutherford about this site physics exhibits history programs Atop the Physics Wave ShareShareShareShareShareMore 9 RUTHERFORD BACK IN CAMBRIDGE, 1919–1937 Sections ← Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next → In 1962, John Cockcroft (1897–1967) reflected back on the “Miraculous Year” ( Annus mirabilis ) of 1932 in the Cavendish Laboratory: “One month it was the neutron, another month the transmutation of the light elements; in another the creation of radiation of matter in the form of pairs of positive and negative electrons was made visible to us by Professor Blackett's cloud chamber, with its tracks curled some to the left and some to the right by powerful magnetic fields.” Rutherford reigned over the Cavendish Lab from 1919 until his death in 1937. The Cavendish Lab in the 1920s and 30s is often cited as the beginning of modern “big science.” Dozens of researchers worked in teams on interrelated problems. Yet much of the work there used simple, inexpensive devices — the sort of thing Rutherford is famous for. And the lab had many competitors: in Paris, Berlin, and even in the U.S. Rutherford became Cavendish Professor and director of the Cavendish Laboratory in 1919, following the It is tempting to simplify a complicated story. Rutherford directed the Cavendish Lab footsteps of J.J. Thomson. Rutherford died in 1937, having led a first wave of discovery of the atom.
    [Show full text]
  • Arthur S. Eddington the Nature of the Physical World
    Arthur S. Eddington The Nature of the Physical World Arthur S. Eddington The Nature of the Physical World Gifford Lectures of 1927: An Annotated Edition Annotated and Introduced By H. G. Callaway Arthur S. Eddington, The Nature of the Physical World: Gifford Lectures of 1927: An Annotated Edition, by H. G. Callaway This book first published 2014 Cambridge Scholars Publishing 12 Back Chapman Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2XX, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2014 by H. G. Callaway All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-6386-6, ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-6386-5 CONTENTS Note to the Text ............................................................................... vii Eddington’s Preface ......................................................................... ix A. S. Eddington, Physics and Philosophy .......................................xiii Eddington’s Introduction ................................................................... 1 Chapter I .......................................................................................... 11 The Downfall of Classical Physics Chapter II ......................................................................................... 31 Relativity Chapter III
    [Show full text]
  • Einstein's Mistakes
    Einstein’s Mistakes Einstein was the greatest genius of the Twentieth Century, but his discoveries were blighted with mistakes. The Human Failing of Genius. 1 PART 1 An evaluation of the man Here, Einstein grows up, his thinking evolves, and many quotations from him are listed. Albert Einstein (1879-1955) Einstein at 14 Einstein at 26 Einstein at 42 3 Albert Einstein (1879-1955) Einstein at age 61 (1940) 4 Albert Einstein (1879-1955) Born in Ulm, Swabian region of Southern Germany. From a Jewish merchant family. Had a sister Maja. Family rejected Jewish customs. Did not inherit any mathematical talent. Inherited stubbornness, Inherited a roguish sense of humor, An inclination to mysticism, And a habit of grüblen or protracted, agonizing “brooding” over whatever was on its mind. Leading to the thought experiment. 5 Portrait in 1947 – age 68, and his habit of agonizing brooding over whatever was on its mind. He was in Princeton, NJ, USA. 6 Einstein the mystic •“Everyone who is seriously involved in pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the universe, one that is vastly superior to that of man..” •“When I assess a theory, I ask myself, if I was God, would I have arranged the universe that way?” •His roguish sense of humor was always there. •When asked what will be his reactions to observational evidence against the bending of light predicted by his general theory of relativity, he said: •”Then I would feel sorry for the Good Lord. The theory is correct anyway.” 7 Einstein: Mathematics •More quotations from Einstein: •“How it is possible that mathematics, a product of human thought that is independent of experience, fits so excellently the objects of physical reality?” •Questions asked by many people and Einstein: •“Is God a mathematician?” •His conclusion: •“ The Lord is cunning, but not malicious.” 8 Einstein the Stubborn Mystic “What interests me is whether God had any choice in the creation of the world” Some broadcasters expunged the comment from the soundtrack because they thought it was blasphemous.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Military Nuclear Strategy And
    The Development of Military Nuclear Strategy and Anglo-American Relations, 1939 – 1958 Submitted by: Geoffrey Charles Mallett Skinner to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History, July 2018 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. (Signature) ……………………………………………………………………………… 1 Abstract There was no special governmental partnership between Britain and America during the Second World War in atomic affairs. A recalibration is required that updates and amends the existing historiography in this respect. The wartime atomic relations of those countries were cooperative at the level of science and resources, but rarely that of the state. As soon as it became apparent that fission weaponry would be the main basis of future military power, America decided to gain exclusive control over the weapon. Britain could not replicate American resources and no assistance was offered to it by its conventional ally. America then created its own, closed, nuclear system and well before the 1946 Atomic Energy Act, the event which is typically seen by historians as the explanation of the fracturing of wartime atomic relations. Immediately after 1945 there was insufficient systemic force to create change in the consistent American policy of atomic monopoly. As fusion bombs introduced a new magnitude of risk, and as the nuclear world expanded and deepened, the systemic pressures grew.
    [Show full text]
  • A Singing, Dancing Universe Jon Butterworth Enjoys a Celebration of Mathematics-Led Theoretical Physics
    SPRING BOOKS COMMENT under physicist and Nobel laureate William to the intensely scrutinized narrative on the discovery “may turn out to be the greatest Henry Bragg, studying small mol ecules such double helix itself, he clarifies key issues. He development in the field of molecular genet- as tartaric acid. Moving to the University points out that the infamous conflict between ics in recent years”. And, on occasion, the of Leeds, UK, in 1928, Astbury probed the Wilkins and chemist Rosalind Franklin arose scope is too broad. The tragic figure of Nikolai structure of biological fibres such as hair. His from actions of John Randall, head of the Vavilov, the great Soviet plant geneticist of the colleague Florence Bell took the first X-ray biophysics unit at King’s College London. He early twentieth century who perished in the diffraction photographs of DNA, leading to implied to Franklin that she would take over Gulag, features prominently, but I am not sure the “pile of pennies” model (W. T. Astbury Wilkins’ work on DNA, yet gave Wilkins the how relevant his research is here. Yet pulling and F. O. Bell Nature 141, 747–748; 1938). impression she would be his assistant. Wilkins such figures into the limelight is partly what Her photos, plagued by technical limitations, conceded the DNA work to Franklin, and distinguishes Williams’s book from others. were fuzzy. But in 1951, Astbury’s lab pro- PhD student Raymond Gosling became her What of those others? Franklin Portugal duced a gem, by the rarely mentioned Elwyn assistant. It was Gosling who, under Franklin’s and Jack Cohen covered much the same Beighton.
    [Show full text]
  • Patrick Blackett: Sailor, Scientist, Socialist, Chris Eldridge
    Naval War College Review Volume 57 Article 31 Number 1 Winter 2004 Patrick Blackett: Sailor, Scientist, Socialist, Chris Eldridge Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Eldridge, Chris (2004) "Patrick Blackett: Sailor, Scientist, Socialist,," Naval War College Review: Vol. 57 : No. 1 , Article 31. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol57/iss1/31 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 156 NAVAL WAR COLLEGE REVIEW Eldridge: Patrick Blackett: Sailor, Scientist, Socialist, understanding with the Soviet Union (a he was the heart and soul of the Cold position favored by some influential War military-academic-industrial com- opinions in the United States) nor to cre- plex. In this book, sixteen authors at- ate trouble for the French government, tempt to shed light on Blackett’s role in seemingly both dependent on and threat- that story. The collection includes pa- ened by the French Communist Party. pers presented at a 1998 conference The Soviet-menace card was played on commemorating Blackett at Cambridge several occasions in the unfolding de- University, as well as other recent writ- bate, but in general it was subordinated ings about him. to more abstract arguments of enlight- Not surprisingly, the compendium of- ened self-interest. Moreover, it was fers a range of perspectives on events clear to many in the administration that and issues with which Blackett was as- too great an emphasis on the immi- sociated, rather than a comprehensive nence of war with Russia would scuttle examination of his life and work.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E Nobel Prizes in Nuclear Science
    Nuclear Science—A Guide to the Nuclear Science Wall Chart ©2018 Contemporary Physics Education Project (CPEP) Appendix E Nobel Prizes in Nuclear Science Many Nobel Prizes have been awarded for nuclear research and instrumentation. The field has spun off: particle physics, nuclear astrophysics, nuclear power reactors, nuclear medicine, and nuclear weapons. Understanding how the nucleus works and applying that knowledge to technology has been one of the most significant accomplishments of twentieth century scientific research. Each prize was awarded for physics unless otherwise noted. Name(s) Discovery Year Henri Becquerel, Pierre Discovered spontaneous radioactivity 1903 Curie, and Marie Curie Ernest Rutherford Work on the disintegration of the elements and 1908 chemistry of radioactive elements (chem) Marie Curie Discovery of radium and polonium 1911 (chem) Frederick Soddy Work on chemistry of radioactive substances 1921 including the origin and nature of radioactive (chem) isotopes Francis Aston Discovery of isotopes in many non-radioactive 1922 elements, also enunciated the whole-number rule of (chem) atomic masses Charles Wilson Development of the cloud chamber for detecting 1927 charged particles Harold Urey Discovery of heavy hydrogen (deuterium) 1934 (chem) Frederic Joliot and Synthesis of several new radioactive elements 1935 Irene Joliot-Curie (chem) James Chadwick Discovery of the neutron 1935 Carl David Anderson Discovery of the positron 1936 Enrico Fermi New radioactive elements produced by neutron 1938 irradiation Ernest Lawrence
    [Show full text]
  • Iasinstitute for Advanced Study
    IAInsti tSute for Advanced Study Faculty and Members 2012–2013 Contents Mission and History . 2 School of Historical Studies . 4 School of Mathematics . 21 School of Natural Sciences . 45 School of Social Science . 62 Program in Interdisciplinary Studies . 72 Director’s Visitors . 74 Artist-in-Residence Program . 75 Trustees and Officers of the Board and of the Corporation . 76 Administration . 78 Past Directors and Faculty . 80 Inde x . 81 Information contained herein is current as of September 24, 2012. Mission and History The Institute for Advanced Study is one of the world’s leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. The Institute exists to encourage and support fundamental research in the sciences and human - ities—the original, often speculative thinking that produces advances in knowledge that change the way we understand the world. It provides for the mentoring of scholars by Faculty, and it offers all who work there the freedom to undertake research that will make significant contributions in any of the broad range of fields in the sciences and humanities studied at the Institute. Y R Founded in 1930 by Louis Bamberger and his sister Caroline Bamberger O Fuld, the Institute was established through the vision of founding T S Director Abraham Flexner. Past Faculty have included Albert Einstein, I H who arrived in 1933 and remained at the Institute until his death in 1955, and other distinguished scientists and scholars such as Kurt Gödel, George F. D N Kennan, Erwin Panofsky, Homer A. Thompson, John von Neumann, and A Hermann Weyl. N O Abraham Flexner was succeeded as Director in 1939 by Frank Aydelotte, I S followed by J.
    [Show full text]
  • Ontology in Quantum Mechanics
    Ontology in quantum mechanics Gerard 't Hooft Faculty of Science, Institute for Theoretical Physics, Utrecht University, Princetonplein 5, 3584 CC Utrecht, The Netherlands e-mail: [email protected] internet: http://www.staff.science.uu.nl/˜hooft101/ Abstract It is suspected that the quantum evolution equations describing the micro-world as we know it are of a special kind that allows transformations to a special set of basis states in Hilbert space, such that, in this basis, the evolution is given by ele- ments of the permutation group. This would restore an ontological interpretation. It is shown how, at low energies per particle degree of freedom, almost any quantum system allows for such a transformation. This contradicts Bell's theorem, and we emphasise why some of the assumptions made by Bell to prove his theorem cannot hold for the models studied here. We speculate how an approach of this kind may become helpful in isolating the most likely version of the Standard Model, combined with General Relativity. A link is suggested with black hole physics. Keywords: foundations quantum mechanics, fast variables, cellular automaton, classical/quantum evolution laws, Stern-Gerlach experiment, Bell's theorem, free will, Standard Model, anti-vacuum state. arXiv:2107.14191v1 [quant-ph] 29 Jul 2021 1 1 Introduction Since its inception, during the first three decades of the 20th century, quantum mechanics was subject of intense discussions concerning its interpretation. Since experiments were plentiful, and accurate calculations could be performed to com- pare the experimental results with the theoretical calculations, scientists quickly agreed on how detailed quantum mechanical models could be arrived at, and how the calculations had to be done.
    [Show full text]
  • Notices of the American Mathematical Society
    • ISSN 0002-9920 March 2003 Volume 50, Number 3 Disks That Are Double Spiral Staircases page 327 The RieITlann Hypothesis page 341 San Francisco Meeting page 423 Primitive curve painting (see page 356) Education is no longer just about classrooms and labs. With the growing diversity and complexity of educational programs, you need a software system that lets you efficiently deliver effective learning tools to literally, the world. Maple® now offers you a choice to address the reality of today's mathematics education. Maple® 8 - the standard Perfect for students in mathematics, sciences, and engineering. Maple® 8 offers all the power, flexibility, and resources your technical students need to manage even the most complex mathematical concepts. MapleNET™ -- online education ,.u A complete standards-based solution for authoring, nv3a~ _r.~ .::..,-;.-:.- delivering, and managing interactive learning modules \~.:...br *'r¥'''' S\l!t"AaITI(!\pU;; ,"", <If through browsers. Derived from the legendary Maple® .Att~~ .. <:t~~::,/, engine, MapleNefM is the only comprehensive solution "f'I!hlislJer~l!'Ct"\ :5 -~~~~~:--r---, for distance education in mathematics. Give your institution and your students cornpetitive edge. For a FREE 3D-day Maple® 8 Trial CD for Windows®, or to register for a FREE MapleNefM Online Seminar call 1/800 R67.6583 or e-mail [email protected]. ADVANCING MATHEMATICS WWW.MAPLESOFT.COM I [email protected]\I I WWW.MAPLEAPPS.COM I NORTH AMERICAN SALES 1/800 267. 6583 © 2003 Woter1oo Ma')Ir~ Inc Maple IS (J y<?glsterc() crademork of Woterloo Maple he Mar)leNet so troc1ema'k of Woter1oc' fV'lop'e Inr PII other trcde,nork$ (ye property o~ their respective ('wners Generic Polynomials Constructive Aspects of the Inverse Galois Problem Christian U.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1211.4061V3 [Physics.Hist-Ph] 8 Feb 2013
    From cosmic ray physics to cosmic ray astronomy: Bruno Rossi and the opening of new windows on the universe Luisa Bonolis Via Cavalese 13 – 00135 Rome, Italy [email protected] Abstract Bruno Rossi is considered one of the fathers of modern physics, being also a pioneer in virtually every aspect of what is today called high-energy astrophysics. At the beginning of 1930s he was the pioneer of cosmic ray research in Italy, and, as one of the leading actors in the study of the nature and behavior of the cosmic radiation, he witnessed the birth of particle physics and was one of the main investigators in this fields for many years. While cosmic ray physics moved more and more towards astrophysics, Rossi continued to be one of the inspirers of this line of research. When outer space became a reality, he did not hesitate to leap into this new scientific dimension. Rossi’s intuition on the importance of exploiting new technological windows to look at the universe with new eyes, is a fundamental key to understand the profound unity which guided his scientific research path up to its culminating moments at the beginning of 1960s, when his group at MIT performed the first in situ measurements of the density, speed and direction of the solar wind at the boundary of Earth’s magnetosphere, and when he promoted the search for extra-solar sources of X rays. A visionary idea which eventually led to the breakthrough experiment which discovered Scorpius X-1 in 1962, and inaugurated X-ray astronomy.
    [Show full text]
  • British Library Courses Study Day: Exploring Diaries, 1660-2019
    British Library Courses www.bl.uk/courses Study Day: Exploring Diaries, 1660-2019 Dates Sunday 24 March 2019 Times 9.45 – 16:00 Location Knowledge Centre Level All levels Cost £55 Overview Six expert speakers discuss the origins and development of diary-keeping from Samuel Pepys to 21st- century vloggers, by way of Romantic travellers, Antarctic explorers and office workers. We also discover how the British Library acquires, preserves and curates diaries, making these unique works available to the public. Programme Registration from 9.30am Tea, coffee and biscuits from 9.45am Morning session 10am – 12.30pm Welcome and Introduction - Dr Emma McEvoy, University of Westminster Kate Loveman, University of Leicester Early Modern Diaries: Samuel Pepys and his friends Emma McEvoy, University of Westminster Touring Britain: Travel Journals 1780-1830 Laura Walker, British Library Cultivating gardens to crossing the ice: Collecting and curating diaries at the British Library Panel Q&A 1 12.30pm – 1.30pm LUNCH BREAK (lunch not provided) Afternoon session 1.30pm – 4pm Graham Farmelo, University of Cambridge Using diaries in writing scientific biographies Joe Moran, Liverpool John Moores University 20th-century diaries and the history of the everyday Clare Brant, King’s College London Diaries in the digital age Panel Q&A Tea and coffee 4pm Event ends Speakers Morning Kate Loveman is an Associate Professor in English 1600-1789 at the University of Leicester, working on the history of reading, sociability and information exchange. She is an expert on Samuel Pepys and recently edited a new annotated selection of his Diary (Everyman 2018). Her other publications include Samuel Pepys and his Books: Reading, Newsgathering, and Sociability 1660–1703 (2015), Reading Fictions 1660-1740: Deception in English Literary and Political Culture (2008) and work on the introduction of chocolate into England in the seventeenth century.
    [Show full text]