DOCSLIB.ORG

Rods in Daylight Act As Relay Cells for Cone-Driven Horizontal Cell&Ndash

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rods in Daylight Act As Relay Cells for Cone-Driven Horizontal Cell&Ndash ART ic LE s Rods in daylight act as relay cells for cone-driven horizontal cell–mediated surround inhibition Tamas Szikra1, Stuart Trenholm1,2, Antonia Drinnenberg1,3, Josephine Jüttner1, Zoltan Raics1, Karl Farrow1,13, Martin Biel4, Gautam Awatramani2, Damon A Clark5, José-Alain Sahel6–10, Rava Azeredo da Silveira11,12 & Botond Roska1 Vertebrate vision relies on two types of photoreceptors, rods and cones, which signal increments in light intensity with graded hyperpolarizations. Rods operate in the lower range of light intensities while cones operate at brighter intensities. The receptive fields of both photoreceptors exhibit antagonistic center-surround organization. Here we show that at bright light levels, mouse rods act as relay cells for cone-driven horizontal cell–mediated surround inhibition. In response to large, bright stimuli that activate their surrounds, rods depolarize. Rod depolarization increases with stimulus size, and its action spectrum matches that of cones. Rod responses at high light levels are abolished in mice with nonfunctional cones and when horizontal cells are reversibly inactivated. Rod depolarization is conveyed to the inner retina via postsynaptic circuit elements, namely the rod bipolar cells. Our results show that the retinal circuitry repurposes rods, when they are not directly sensing light, to relay cone-driven surround inhibition. Image-forming vision is based on two types of photoreceptors, rods it is expected that mammalian rods will respond to light, indirectly, and cones, which respond to light directly with graded hyperpolariza- at high light levels, even when their photoresponses are at saturation. tions1. Rods respond in the lower range of light intensities, charac- For this indirect rod response, cones would act as photoreceptors and teristic of night-time, while cones operate at higher light intensities, drive changes in rod membrane potential via gap junctions, resulting characteristic of daytime. These two photoreceptors interact with in sign-conserving responses in rods (that is, hyperpolarizing light the third neuronal cell type of the outer retina, the horizontal cells, responses). Alternatively, the bright light mediated cone signal could 2 Nature America, Inc. All rights reserved. Inc. Nature America, which provide feedback inhibition to both photoreceptors . In most potentially arrive at rods via the inhibitory horizontal cells, leading to 4 mammals there are two types of horizontal cells, one with a long a change in response polarity, causing rods to exhibit a depolarizing axon and one without. In mouse there is only the axon-bearing type response. This circuit involves feedforward inhibition via horizontal 3 © 201 of horizontal cell . It has been proposed that rods contact horizontal cells: cones drive horizontal cell dendrites, and this signal spreads cell axon terminals while cones contact horizontal cell dendrites4,5 from horizontal cell dendrites to axon terminals and then drives rod and that each of these horizontal cell compartments forms local nega- depolarization via sign-inverting synapses. However, it has been pro- tive feedback synapses with its corresponding photoreceptor class6–12. posed that the long axons of horizontal cells do not conduct signals9, a Furthermore, dendro-dendritic and axo-axonic electrical synapses notion that has recently been challenged12. These two possible circuits between horizontal cells have been shown to mediate lateral signal for crosstalk between cones and rods are not mutually exclusive since spread13. The neuronal circuit formed by rods, cones and horizontal they may act at different spatial or temporal scales or under different cells results in antagonistic center-surround receptive field organi- conditions, such as at different circadian times16. zation in rods at low light levels and in cones and high light levels. The functional consequences of these two crosstalk pathways are Information from photoreceptors enters the inner retina by two pri- different. In the first case, rods functionally copy cones and this sign- mary pathways: from rods to rod bipolar cells and from cones to cone conserving pathway provides cones with a second ‘center pathway’ to bipolar cells. Alternative pathways have also been described2,14. the inner retina, as has been proposed before14. In the second case Rods and cones are also directly connected both to themselves and to rods convey cone-driven, horizontal cell–mediated surround inhibi- one another with gap junctions14,15. As a result of cone-rod coupling, tion to downstream visual circuits. Like rods, cones may also display 1Neural Circuit Laboratories, Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland. 2Department of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. 3University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. 4Department of Pharmacy–Center for Drug Research, Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany. 5Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA. 6Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Sorbonne Universités, Institut de la Vision, Paris, France. 7Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, Institut de la Vision, Paris, France. 8Centre national de la recherche scientifique, Institut de la Vision, Paris, France. 9Centre Hospitalier National d’Ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts, Département Hospitalo-Universitaire ViewMaintain, Paris, France. 10Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild, Paris, France. 11Department of Physics, École Normale Supérieure, Paris, France. 12Laboratoire de Physique Statistique, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Université Denis Diderot, Paris, France. 13Present address: Neuro-Electronics Research Flanders Imec, Leuven, Belgium. Correspondence should be addressed to B.R. ([email protected]). Received 1 September; accepted 29 September; published online 26 October 2014; doi:10.1038/nn.3852 NATURE NEUROSCIENCE ADVANCE ONLINE PUBLICATION 1 ART ic LE s indirect15 responses at low light levels at which they do not respond We used perforated patch clamp to preclude the decrease of directly to light. Here the origin of the light response would be rods photoresponse over time due to washout of the phototransduction and the polarity of the response would be either sign-conserving or cascade components. We approached rods from the ganglion cell side sign-inverting, depending on the pathway—via gap junctions or via because from this side we could visualize individual rod cell bodies horizontal cells. The presence and the relative magnitude of these under infrared illumination. Since the recorded responses were crosstalk pathways, in different background light conditions, in intact small (Supplementary Fig. 1a), likely owing to small seal-to-access mammalian retinas are not well understood. resistance ratio, response amplitudes most likely did not represent Here we recorded light-evoked signals from single rods and real response amplitudes. Therefore, experiments with different rods cones in wholemount mouse retina. We show that, at high back- were compared using their responses relative to their maximum ground light levels when stimulated with large spots, rods respond hyperpolarizing response. with depolarization. Rod depolarization has the same action spec- We presented retinas with white spots of light of different sizes for trum as cone photoresponses and is absent when cones are not 2 s, at a fixed contrast but at different background light intensities functional or when horizontal cells are reversibly inactivated. Rod spanning six decades (Fig. 1a). As expected17, the rod response to depolarization spreads to the inner retina via rod bipolar cells. At contrast increments was hyperpolarizing at low background light lev- low background light levels when stimulated with large spots, cones els. The response was sustained, and its magnitude initially increased also respond with depolarization. These results suggest that mouse and then decreased with increasing spot size, displaying the classi- horizontal cell axons convey information in both directions, allow- cal center-surround receptive field organization of rods. The initial ing cone hyperpolarization at high background light levels to cause increase in response was likely due to the electrical coupling between rod depolarization and rod hyperpolarization at low background rods14,18,19 and the decrease can be attributed to feedback inhibition light levels to cause cone depolarization. a b Stimulus As a consequence, outside of their photon- intensity: Spot diameter 25 50 100 200 400 800 1,600 150 sensing range of light intensities, mouse (µm): 1,090 R* s–1 Stimulus 100 rods act as relay cells conveying cone-driven, intensity: n = 8 horizontal cell–mediated surround inhibition 10,700 50 to downstream visual circuits. 0 1,090 –50 1.5 R* s–1 RESULTS Normalized voltage (%) –100 110 Rod depolarization at high light levels 0 400 800 1,200 1,600 We recorded voltage responses from single Spot size (µm) 13 rod cell bodies in wholemount mouse retina, c 300 using the perforated patch clamp technique. 1.5 ) 200 100 n = 8 Figure 1 Rods respond with depolarization to 0.26 0 Normalized large spots at high light levels in wholemount R* s–1 0.05 mV voltage (% –100 Nature America, Inc. All rights reserved. Inc. Nature America, retina. (a) Light responses to contrast increments 2 s 4 elicited by spots of different sizes were measured
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Real-Time Retinomorphic Simulator Using a Conductance-Based Discrete Neuronal Network
    A Real-Time Retinomorphic Simulator Using a Conductance-Based Discrete Neuronal Network Seungbum Baek1;5, Jason K. Eshraghian2;5, Wesley Thio2, Yulia Sandamirskaya3, Herbert H.C. Iu 4 and Wei D. Lu2 1College of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 362763, South Korea 2School of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA 3Institute of Neuroinformatics Neuroscience Center Zurich University and ETH Zurich, Switzerland 4School of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia 5These authors contributed equally to this manuscript. Abstract—We present an optimized conductance-based retina [2], and fabricating high-performance image sensors that are microcircuit simulator which transforms light stimuli into a on par with the specifications of the retina in terms of power series of graded and spiking action potentials through photo dissipation, dynamic range, and resolution [3]–[7]. At present, transduction. We use discrete retinal neuron blocks based on a collation of single-compartment models and morphologically most bio-inspired image processors trade-off the ability to pass realistic formulations, and successfully achieve a biologically low-frequency content and low spatial resolution, in favor of real-time simulator. This is done by optimizing the numerical practicality. methods employed to solve the system of over 270 nonlinear Beyond hardware, a similar distinction exists between bi-
    [Show full text]
  • Structure of Cone Photoreceptors
    Progress in Retinal and Eye Research 28 (2009) 289–302 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Progress in Retinal and Eye Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/prer Structure of cone photoreceptors Debarshi Mustafi a, Andreas H. Engel a,b, Krzysztof Palczewski a,* a Department of Pharmacology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106-4965, USA b Center for Cellular Imaging and Nanoanalytics, M.E. Mu¨ller Institute, Biozentrum, WRO-1058, Mattenstrasse 26, CH 4058 Basel, Switzerland abstract Keywords: Although outnumbered more than 20:1 by rod photoreceptors, cone cells in the human retina mediate Cone photoreceptors daylight vision and are critical for visual acuity and color discrimination. A variety of human diseases are Rod photoreceptors characterized by a progressive loss of cone photoreceptors but the low abundance of cones and the Retinoids absence of a macula in non-primate mammalian retinas have made it difficult to investigate cones Retinoid cycle directly. Conventional rodents (laboratory mice and rats) are nocturnal rod-dominated species with few Chromophore Opsins cones in the retina, and studying other animals with cone-rich retinas presents various logistic and Retina technical difficulties. Originating in the early 1900s, past research has begun to provide insights into cone Vision ultrastructure but has yet to afford an overall perspective of cone cell organization. This review Rhodopsin summarizes our past progress and focuses on the recent introduction of special mammalian models Cone pigments (transgenic mice and diurnal rats rich in cones) that together with new investigative techniques such as Enhanced S-cone syndrome atomic force microscopy and cryo-electron tomography promise to reveal a more unified concept of cone Retinitis pigmentosa photoreceptor organization and its role in retinal diseases.
    [Show full text]
  • Reprogramming of Adult Rod Photoreceptors Prevents Retinal Degeneration
    Reprogramming of adult rod photoreceptors prevents retinal degeneration Cynthia L. Montanaa, Alexander V. Kolesnikovb, Susan Q. Shena, Connie A. Myersa, Vladimir J. Kefalovb, and Joseph C. Corboa,1 Departments of aPathology and Immunology and bOphthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110 Edited by Jeremy Nathans, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, and approved December 19, 2012 (received for review August 20, 2012) A prime goal of regenerative medicine is to direct cell fates in become cones (17, 18). We reasoned that acute inactivation of Nrl a therapeutically useful manner. Retinitis pigmentosa is one of the in adult rods might result in direct conversion of these cells into most common degenerative diseases of the eye and is associated cones. Furthermore, a recent study demonstrated that retinas in with early rod photoreceptor death followed by secondary cone which Nrl had been knocked out during development showed long- degeneration. We hypothesized that converting adult rods into term survival of cone photoreceptors and preservation of the outer cones, via knockdown of the rod photoreceptor determinant Nrl, nuclear layer, after a transient initial phase of cell loss (19). This could make the cells resistant to the effects of mutations in rod- observation suggests that direct conversion of adult rods into cones specific genes, thereby preventing secondary cone loss. To test this could also lead to long-term survival of the transdifferentiated idea, we engineered a tamoxifen-inducible allele of Nrl to acutely cells. To test this idea, we used a tamoxifen-inducible allele of Nrl inactivate the gene in adult rods.
    [Show full text]
  • Difference Between Rod and Cone Cells Key Difference
    Difference Between Rod and Cone Cells www.differencebetween.com Key Difference - Rod vs Cone Cells The photoreceptors are cells in the retina of the eye which respond to the light. The distinguishing feature of these cells is the presence of tightly packed membrane that contains the photopigment known as rhodopsin or related molecules. The photopigments have a similar structure. All photopigments consist of a protein called opsin and a small attached molecule known as a chromophore. The chromophore absorbs the portion of light by a mechanism that involves the change in its configuration. The tight packing in the membranes of these photoreceptors is highly valuable in order to achieve high photopigment density. This allows the large portion of light photons which reach the photoreceptors to be absorbed. In vertebrates, the retina consists of two photoreceptors (rod and cone cells) which are bearing photopigment at their outer region. This particular region is composed of a large number of pancake-like disks. In rod cells, the disks are closed, but in the cone cells, the disks are partially open to the surrounding fluids. In invertebrates, the photoreceptors structure is very different. The photopigment was born in a regularly arranged structure called as microvilli, finger-like projections with about diameter of 0.1µm. This photoreceptor structure in invertebrates is known as rhabdom. The photopigments are less densely packed in the rhabdom than in vertebrates’ disks. The key difference between rod and cone cells is that the rod cells are responsible for vision at the low light levels (scotopic vision) while the cone cells are active at higher light levels (photopic vision).
    [Show full text]
  • Miiller Cells Are a Preferred Substrate for in Vitro Neurite Extension by Rod Photoreceptor Cells
    The Journal of Neuroscience, October 1991, 1 l(10): 2985-2994 Miiller Cells Are a Preferred Substrate for in vitro Neurite Extension by Rod Photoreceptor Cells lvar J. Kljavin’ and Thomas A. Reh2 ‘Neuroscience Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, Lion’s Sight Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N lN4 and ‘Department of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195 To define the factors important in photoreceptor cell mor- (Silver and Sidman, 1980; Krayanek and Goldberg, 1981). Ad- phogenesis, we have examined the ability of rods to extend ditional studies have begun to characterize the moleculesthat neurites in vitro. Retinas from neonatal rats were dissociated are responsiblefor regulating the growth of ganglion cell axons and plated onto substrate-bound extracellular matrix (ECM) during development, and it appearsthat many of the ECM and components or cell monolayers. When rods, identified with cell adhesion molecules involved in axon outgrowth are con- monoclonal antibodies to opsin, were in contact exclusively centrated on the neuroepithelial cell end feet along these long with purified ECM (e.g., laminin, fibronectin, type I collagen, tracts (Silver and Rutishauser, 1984; Halfter et al., 1988). or Matrigel), neurite outgrowth was extremely limited. By However, during the normal development of the retina, as contrast, rods extended long neurites on Miiller cells. Retinal well as other areas of the CNS, most neurons do not extend or brain astrocytes, endothelial cells, 3T3 fibroblasts, or oth- axons into long pathways, but rather, their axons terminate on er retinal neurons were less supportive of rod process out- neighboring cells. In the retina, for example, the axons of the growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Antioxidants Reduce Cone Cell Death in a Model of Retinitis Pigmentosa
    Antioxidants reduce cone cell death in a model of retinitis pigmentosa Keiichi Komeima, Brian S. Rogers, Lili Lu, and Peter A. Campochiaro* Departments of Ophthalmology and Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287-9277 Edited by Jeremy Nathans, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, and approved June 9, 2006 (received for review May 16, 2006) Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is a label for a group of diseases caused to release a chemoattractant for RPE cells stimulating their tran- by a large number of mutations that result in rod photoreceptor sretinal migration. It is remarkable that the death of rods can have cell death followed by gradual death of cones. The mechanism of these remote effects long after they have departed. cone cell death is uncertain. Rods are a major source of oxygen The loss of rods has delayed effects on other cells in addition to utilization in the retina and, after rods die, the level of oxygen in vascular and RPE cells. After the death of rods, cone photorecep- the outer retina is increased. In this study, we used the rd1 mouse tors begin to die. Depletion of rods is responsible for night model of RP to test the hypothesis that cones die from oxidative blindness, the first symptom of RP, but it is the death of cones that damage. A mixture of antioxidants was selected to try to maximize is responsible for the gradual constriction of the visual fields and protection against oxidative damage achievable by exogenous eventual blindness. The mechanism of the gradual death of cones supplements; ␣-tocopherol (200 mg͞kg), ascorbic acid (250 mg͞kg), is one of the key unsolved mysteries of RP.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Vision the Visual System
    Human Vision The Visual System • The visual system consists of two parts. – The eyes act as image receptors. – The brain acts as an image processing and interpretation unit. • Understanding how we see requires that we understand both components. The Human Eye (The Right Eye Viewed From Above) Conjunctiva Zonula Retina Fovea Aqueous humour Lens Pupil Cornea Iris Optic nerve Constricted and Dilated Pupils Constricted Dilated Retinal Structure • Receptor cells are at the back of the retina. • Light passes “through the wiring”. • Horizontal cells do some initial signal processing. ganglion cell choroid horizontal cell rod bipolar cell cone Light Photo Receptor Cells • The eye contains two different classes of light sensitive cells (or photo receptors). • Rod cells provide sensitive low-light vision. • Cone cells provide normal vision. Rod Cells • Rod cells provide low-light vision. • There is only one type of rod cell. • Rod cells provide no colour discrimination. Cone Cells • Cone cells operate at medium and high light levels. • There are three different kinds of cone cells, each sensitive to different light wavelengths. • The sensitivity to different wavelengths is what provides us with colour vision. Rod And Cone Distribution • The distribution of rod and cone cells is not uniform across the retina. • The cones are concentrated at the centre rear of the retina and the rods are more evenly distributed away from that area. The Distribution of Rod and Cone Cells 200 Cones 150 Rods 100 50 Density in thousands per square mm 0 −80 −60 −40 −20 0 20 40 60 80 Angular distance from the fovea (in degrees) The Macula And Fovea • The centre-rear of the retina has a small yellow spot known as the macula.
    [Show full text]
  • Eye Structure and Chemical Details of the Retinal Layer of Juvenile Queen Danio Devario Regina (Fowler, 1934)
    Kasetsart J. (Nat. Sci.) 49 : 711 - 716 (2015) Eye Structure and Chemical Details of the Retinal Layer of Juvenile Queen Danio Devario regina (Fowler, 1934) Piyakorn Boonyoung1, Sinlapachai Senarat2, Jes Kettratad2, Pisit Poolprasert3, Watiporn Yenchum4 and Wannee Jiraungkoorskul5,* ABSTRACT The eye structures and chemical details of the retinal layer in juvenile Queen Danio—Devario regina, an ornamental fish—were histologically investigated under a light microscope. Sample fish were collected from the Tapee River, Nakhon Si Thammarat province, Thailand and their heads were exclusively prepared using a standard histological technique. The results revealed that the eye of D. regina was composed of three layers—inner, middle and external—based on histological organization and cell types. The inner layer was composed of 10 layers; 1) pigment epithelium, 2) photoreceptor layer, 3) outer liming membrane, 4) outer nuclear layer, 5) outer plexiform layer, 6) inner nuclear layer, 7) inner plexiform layer, 8) ganglion cell layer, 9) optic nerve layer and 10) inner limiting membrane, respectively. The localization and chemical details showed that a periodic acid-Schiff reaction for the detection of glycoprotein was intensive in the pigment epithelial layer whereas the inner plexifrom layer had only a slight reaction. Reaction of aniline blue was employed for the detection of mucopolysaccharide which was slightly positive for three layers—the outer limiting membrane, outer plexiform and inner plexiform. Keywords: eye, histology, Devario regina, histochemistry INTRODUCTION cornea and the surrounding water and therefore, the lens has to do the majority of the refraction The eye is a specialized organ for the (Land and Nilsson, 2012). “Due to a refractive detection and analysis of light.
    [Show full text]
  • Rod Photoreceptor Neurite Sprouting in Retinitis Pigmentosa
    The Journal of Neuroscience, August 1995, 75(8): 5429-5438 Rod Photoreceptor Neurite Sprouting in Retinitis Pigmentosa Zong-Yi Li,’ lvar J. Kljavin,* and Ann H. Milam’ 1Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195 and ‘Genentech, South San Francisco, California 94080 In animal models for retinitis pigmentosa (RP), rod photo- Retinitis pigmentosa(RP) is a group of inherited diseasesthat receptors show abnormal distribution of rhodopsin prior to cause degeneration of rod and cone photoreceptors, reactive undergoing cell death. To elucidate the steps in degenera- changesin the retinal pigment epithelium and Miiller glia, and tion of human photoreceptors, immunocytochemistry was atrophy of blood vesselsand neuronsin the inner retina (Stone performed on donor retinas from 15 RP patients and five et al., 1992; Li et al., 1995). RP is associatedwith mutations in normal subjects. Rhodopsin immunolabeling in the normal several photoreceptor-specificgenes, including rhodopsin (Dry- retinas was restricted to the rod outer segments. In the RP ja, 1992; Humphries et al., 1993), but many gaps remain in our retinas, rhodopsin was present in shortened rod outer seg- understandingof the mechanismsof photoreceptor dysfunction ments and in the surface membranes of the rod inner seg- and death. Recent studies of mice carrying mutant rhodopsin ments and somata. In regions of photoreceptor death, the transgenesdemonstrated that their rods show abnormallocaliza- surviving rods had sprouted rhodopsin-positive neurites tion of rhodopsin,transducin, and phosphodiesteraseprior to un- that were closely associated with gliotic Mi.iller cell process- dergoing cell death (Roof et al., 1994; Sung et al., 1994). To es and extended to the inner limiting membrane.
    [Show full text]
  • Visual System EYEBALL — Composed of Three Concentric Layers: 1] SCLERA (White) and CORNEA (Transparent) = Outer, Fibrous Layer
    Lecture 16 Visual System EYEBALL — composed of three concentric layers: 1] SCLERA (white) and CORNEA (transparent) = outer, fibrous layer. 2] IRIS, CILIARY BODY and CHOROID = middle, vascular layer (uvea). The choroid contains a tapetum lucidum in most domestic animals (absent in the pig). 3] RETINA = inner layer of the eyeball (develops embryologically from an optic cup). The pigmented epithelium of the retina lines the iris, ciliary body & choroid. The functional optic part of retina lines the fundus to the level of the ora serrata. Fundus of Right Eye Tapetum Ciliary body lucidum Iris Retina RETINA vessel Cornea Lens area centralis Optic disc Area Optic disc ora serrata centralis Sclera (visual streak) Optic nerve RETINA Overview. The retina develops from the optic cup of the diencephalon, and the optic nerve is histologically a CNS tract. Ten histological layers are recognized in the optic part of the retina. Light must penetrate eight of the layers to reach outer segments of rods and cones where photons are absorbed. Processes of pigmented epithelial cells surround the outer segments of rods and cones. Pigmented epithelial cells are a source of Vitamin A that rods and cones convert to retinal, the photon absorbing molecule. Circuitry. Photoreceptor cells (rods and cones) synapse on bipolar cells which, in turn, synapse on ganglion cells. Photoreceptor cells also synapse on horizontal cells which provide lateral inhibition to sharpen the visual image, as do amacrine cells. Nonmyelinated axons of ganglion cells run to the optic disk and then exit the eyeball as myeli- nated axons that comprise the optic nerve. Photo- receptor cells are absent at the optic disc (blind spot).
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristics of Exocytosis and Endocytosis in Photoreceptors
    University of Nebraska Medical Center DigitalCommons@UNMC Theses & Dissertations Graduate Studies Summer 8-14-2015 Characteristics of Exocytosis and Endocytosis in Photoreceptors Karlene M. Cork University of Nebraska Medical Center Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unmc.edu/etd Part of the Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience Commons Recommended Citation Cork, Karlene M., "Characteristics of Exocytosis and Endocytosis in Photoreceptors" (2015). Theses & Dissertations. 13. https://digitalcommons.unmc.edu/etd/13 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@UNMC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNMC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CHARACTERISTICS OF EXOCYTOSIS AND ENDOCYTOSIS IN PHOTORECEPTORS By Karlene Cork A DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of the University of Nebraska Graduate College in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Pharmacology and Experimental Neuroscience Under the Supervision of Professor Wallace B. Thoreson, Ph.D. University of Nebraska Medical Center Omaha, Nebraska July, 2015 Supervisory Committee: Keshore Bidasee, Ph.D. Anna Dunaevsky, Ph.D. Myron L. Toews, Ph.D. ii Acknowledgements I would like to thank my mentor, Dr. Wallace B. Thoreson, for his guidance and support throughout my graduate study. Thanks also to members of the Thoreson laboratory for assistance including Dr. Minghui Chen and Dr. Matthew Van Hook. I would also like to thank my dissertation committee members, Dr. Keshore R. Bidasee, Dr. Anna Dunaevsky, and Dr. Myron L. Toews, for their suggestions on my research work. [Type text] iii Table of Contents Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………………....ii Table of contents…………………………………………………………………………...iii-vi Abstract………………………………………………………………………………………..1-2 Chapter 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ageing Retina: Physiology Or Pathology
    Eye (1987) 1, 282-295 The Ageing Retina: Physiology or Pathology JOHN MARSHALL London Summary The human'fetina is a unique component of the nervous system in that throughout life it is continuously exposed to optical radiation between 400 and 1400 nm. The physiology of the ageing retina and the regression in visual performance with age cannot therefore be studied in isolation, or discriminated, from the life long cumulative effects of radiant exposure. This paper describes the spectrum of age related changes in the retina as they merge imperceptibly between declining visual function and overt pathology. Functional Loss ponents, the larger one being diminished Virtually every measure of visual function transmission by the ageing lens and a smaller demonstrates declining performance with one induced by neuronal changes in the age­ increasing age.! However, since all the com­ ing retina and cortex. ponents of the eye age in different ways it is Age related degradations in visual acuity5.6 essential when assessing changes in retinal or and contrast sensitivity7,8 have been docu­ neural function to allow for changes in the mented for many years9 and are especially stimulous incident upon the retina due to evident over the age of 60 years. 5 Recently the either perturbations in the optic media or use of sinusoidal grating patterns generated physiological processes in the anterior eye. by a laser interferometerlO has enabled the For example, in the older eye the retinal irra­ independent assessment of degradation of the diance achieved by a given source with a given image quality by the optic media and the geometry will be less than that in a young eye effective loss in resolving power of the neuro­ because of a reduced pupillary diameter nal components in the visual system.Il,12 The (senile miosis), and decreasing transmission conclusion from such studies is that the age and increasing fluorescence properties of the related deterioration in contrast sensitivity is cornea and lens.
    [Show full text]