DRAFT Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Report INO: Riau Natural Gas Power Project ESIA Vol.5 Technical Appendices Part
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
DRAFT Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Report Project Number: 50182-001 November 2018 INO: Riau Natural Gas Power Project ESIA Vol.5_Technical Appendices Part I Prepared by ESC for the Asian Development Bank The environmental and social impact assessment is a document of the project sponsor. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “Terms of Use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of or any territory or area. The Sustainable Livelihood Framework is one model for understanding and improving the poverty livelihood conditions experienced by a household or community. Through this framework it can be helpful in describing the main factors affecting the living conditions of a poor family and the form of relationships among these factors. This concept can be used for planning development programs and assessing the extent to which effectiveness and contributions have been made in community empowerment programs. In addition to the five capitals mentioned above, poverty and vulnerability conditions are also influenced by trends or changes tendency that occurs in society such as ecological and social conditions, the occurrence of natural disasters, famine, and so forth. Furthermore, this framework also provides an overview of how the institutional and government policy aspects have also contributed greatly to the ups and downs of the livelihoods and vulnerability of households and communities. 1.2 OBJECTIVE The objectives of this baseline social study are as follows: • To know the social, economic, cultural and public health conditions along the 250MW GSPP Riau gas pipeline; • To know the community perception along the 250MW GSPP Riau gas pipeline about the planned installation of the 250 MW GSPP Riau gas pipe; and • Especially this study is also for digging about the interaction pattern between the people of the community around the locations of temporary jetty and water intake of 250MW GSPP Riau with the Siak River. 2 STUDY SCOPE 2.1 LOCATION The baseline social study covers two study areas, namely (1) gas pipeline area; and (2) temporary jetty and water intake area. The baseline social study location for gas pipeline areas cover five villages in three sub- districts within the Pekanbaru City and Siak District. This study location is an area that will be passed through by a 40km gas pipeline, which stretching from gas pipe tapping location in Kuala Gasib Village to the power plant location in Industri Tenayan Village. Below is the names of study location villages: 2-1 | P a g e Table 2-1 Study Location Administration Area in Gas Pipeline Area City/District Sub-district Village Pekanbaru City Tenayan Raya 1) Melebung Village Siak District Tualang 2) Meredan Village 3) Tualang Timur Village 4) Pinang Sebatang Village Koto Gasib 5) Kuala Gasib Villlage Source : Prime Data, 2018 While for the study area of temporary jetty and water intake locations, was conducted on the Sik Riverbank which there will be temporary jetty facilities being built for GSPP construction project mobilization needs and GSPP water intake facilities in the Industri Tenayan Village, Tenayan Raya Sub-district, Pekanbaru City. Figure 2-1 Map of Gas Pipeline and Study Locations 2-2 | P a g e Figure 2-2 Satellitee Image of Temporary Jetty and Water Intake Areas On below table it can be seen the study location area borders: Table 2-2 The Administrative Area Borders of Study Locations Borders No Area North South East West Kampar and Siak and Siak and Kampar Kampar 1 Pekanbaru City Pelalawan Pelalawan Districts District Districts Districts Siak and Tenayan Raya 2 Siak River Kampar District Pelalawan Sail River Sub-district Districts Tujuh Puluh Siak River Penampuan Sungai Teleju Industri Tenayan Street 3 (Rumbai Pesisir River (Sialang (Bambu Kuning Village (Melebung Sub-district Sakti Village) Village) Village) Binjai River Tenayan Stream and Tujuh Penampuan (Lubuk Kompeh) Puluh Street Tuah Negeri Beringin Street 4 River (Melebung and Budi Luhur (Sialang Sakti Village (Siak District) Village) Street (Kulim and Bencah Village) Lesung Villages) Pendanau River Tujuh Puluh Siak River , Penampuan River Melebung and Beringin Street (Industri 5 Rumbai Pesisir (Tuah Negeri Village Street (Siak Tenayan Village Village) District) Village) 6 Siak District Bengkalis District Kampar, Bengkalis, Rokan Bengkalis and Pelalawan Hulu, Kampar Pelalawn 2-3 | P a g e Districts and Districts and Districts Pekanbaru City Pekanbaru City Minas Sub- Koto Gasib, and Tualang Sub- Kerinci Kanan district, 7 Minas Sub-district Lubuk Dalam district Sub-district Pekanbaru Sub-districts City Pekanbaru Koto Gasib Sub- City 8 Maredan Village Tualang Village Pekanbaru City distrct Borders No Area North North Tualang Timur Pinang Sebatang Koto Gasib 9 Maredan Village Tualang Village Village Village Sub-district Pinang Pinang Koto Gasib Sub- Tualang Timur Koto Gasib Sub- 10 Sebatang Sebatang district Village district Village Barat Sungai Mandau Koto Gasib Lubuk Dalam Dayun, Mempura Tualang Sub- 11 Sub-district, Siak Village Sub-district Sub-districts district sub-district Sungai Kuala Gasib Sungai Mandau Tualang Sub- Teluk Rimba 12 Mandau Sub Village Sub-district district Village District Source : Prime Data, 2018 2.2 POPULATION The population in this study are all the households in the five villages around the gas pipeline area which will be directly impacted by gas pipe installation, which are the households within the ±20 range of the gas pipeline on either side. Should there were gas pipeline passing through the plantation area where there were no houses exist, then the population in the nearest village is assumed to be the representative of impacted household. The sample total were 150 respondents, namely 30 respondents in each village and assumed to represent the condition of all the population in the study location. Specifically for the temporary jetty and water intake area, there was no sampling survey conducted on the population, and only qualitative study was done focusing on the interaction pattern between the community with the Siak River. 2.3 DATA NEEDS The data needs of this baseline social study are as follows : 1. The socio-economy data along the gas pipeline with the study objects as follows : • Residents; • Businesses such as grocery stores, kiosks, shops or restaurants; • Squatters or cultivators; • Agriculture activities (farming or plantation land); and • Other business activities 2. The community’s health data in five study llocation villages covers 10 major community diseases, health facilities, medical personels, environmental sanitationand health issues; 2-4 | P a g e 3. The education data in five study location covers the general condition of the education, education facilities, instructors, pupils numbers, and educational issues; 4. The borders of study location villages, and the history of community’s settlement development in study location; 5. The cultural data covers the study object as follows: • Community’s historical background and ethnicity which currently exist in study location. • Custom and important tradition that applied in the study location’s community.; • A cultural heritage site located within a two kilometer radius of the gas pipeline; 6. The socio-economy and cultural data in the temporary jetty and water intake area : The The study focus was the interaction pattern between local people with the Siak River, either in the water usage as the livelihood sources, transportation means or other social functions. 2.4 IMPLEMENTATION TIME The implementation of the study consists of three stages of activity, namely the survey and data collection stage, data processing and analysis stage, and report preparation data. Data collection activities were conducted at the study sites on 14 till 24 February 2018. Then continued with data processing and report preparation in Jakarta until April 2018. 2.5 STUDY LIMITATION In this social baseline study execution, there were several study limits that had implication toward the field data result as follows: • Not all villages in the study location has complete data in its monograph, especially related to the villagers numbers and composition based on ethnic gtoup or religion, age group and education level; • There were obstacles in getting the helath data in Tenayan Raya Sub-district, caused by the following factors: - There were a quite strict bureaucratic process in getting the health data in Public Health Centre, whereas it has through the permission process of Kesbangpol (Unity of nation and politic) and Health Agency of Pekanbaru City; - There were new administrative area as a result of area’s division such as Industri Tenayan Village which still do not have subsidiary public health centre; and - The public health official in the subsidiary public health centre in Melebung Village was hard to see. 2-5 | P a g e 3 METHODOLOGY 3.1 RESEARCH DESIGN This study uses the theory of the Sustainable Livelihood Framework developed by Chambers and Conway (1992). This framework theory of sustainable livelihood resources analyzes the social and economic conditions of family and society by using five livelihood capital sources, namely human capital, natural capital, social capital, physical capital, and financial capital. These five capital sources of livelihood are then downgraded into several measurable variables in the field. The above five capital livelihood resources owned will then be combined with several other external conditions, such as the vulnerability context caused by ecological and social conditions, existing institutional conditions in society, and government policies. The combination of capital livelihoods ownership and external conditions will influence the forms of livelihood strategies that will be developed and will ultimately determine the conditions of the welfare of a community.