DOCSLIB.ORG

Order/ Loc. Type Name Location County Adj. 1/ POOL PLANTS 1. POOL DISTRIBUTING PLANTS (Sec. 1124.7(A Or B)) Alpenrose Dairy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Order/ Loc. Type Name Location County Adj. 1/ POOL PLANTS 1. POOL DISTRIBUTING PLANTS (Sec. 1124.7(A Or B)) Alpenrose Dairy LIST OF PLANTS - JANUARY 1, 2002 PACIFIC NORTHWEST MARKETING AREA (FO 124) Order/ Loc. Type Name Location County Adj. 1/ POOL PLANTS 1. POOL DISTRIBUTING PLANTS (Sec. 1124.7(a or b)) Alpenrose Dairy, Inc. Portland, OR Multnomah $ - Andersen Dairy, Inc. Battle Ground, WA Clark $ - Eberhard Creamery, Inc. Redmond, OR Deschutes $ (0.15) Inland Northwest Dairies, L.L.C. Spokane, WA Spokane $ - Safeway 85, Inc. Moses Lake, WA Grant $ (0.15) Safeway Stores, Inc. Bellevue, WA King $ - Safeway Stores, Inc. Clackamas, OR Clackamas $ - Sunshine Dairy, Inc. Portland, OR Multnomah $ - The Kroger Co., Swan Island Dairy Portland, OR Multnomah $ - Umpqua Dairy Products Co., Inc. Roseburg, OR Douglas $ - Vitamilk Dairy, Inc. Seattle, WA King $ - WestFarm Foods Medford, OR Jackson $ - WestFarm Foods Portland, OR Multnomah $ - WestFarm Foods Seattle, WA King $ - Wilcox Dairy Farms, L.L.C. Cheney, WA Spokane $ - Wilcox Dairy Farms, L.L.C. Roy, WA Pierce $ - Wilcox Dairy Farms, L.L.C. (d/b/a Curly's) Salem, OR Marion $ - Zottola Dairy Products, Inc. Grants Pass, OR Josephine $ - d/b/a Valley of the Rogue Dairy 2. POOL SUPPLY PLANTS (Sec. 1124.7(c)) Farmers Cooperative Creamery McMinnville, OR Yamhill $ - Tillamook County Creamery Assn. Tillamook, OR Tillamook $ - NONPOOL PLANTS 5. OTHER ORDER PLANTS DISTRIBUTING OR TRANSFERRING FLUID MILK PRODUCTS INTO THE MARKETING AREA (Sec. 1124.8(a)) Gossner Foods, Inc. (FO 135) Logan, UT Cache $ - Lifeway Foods, Inc. (FO 30) Morton Grove, IL Cook $ (0.10) Parmalat White Knight Corp. (FO 33) Wyoming, MI Kent $ (0.10) Page 1 of 12 LIST OF PLANTS - JANUARY 1, 2002 PACIFIC NORTHWEST MARKETING AREA (FO 124) Order/ Loc. Type Name Location County Adj. 1/ NONPOOL PLANTS . (Continued) 5. OTHER ORDER PLANTS DISTRIBUTING OR TRANSFERRING FLUID MILK PRODUCTS INTO THE MARKETING AREA (Sec. 1124.8(a)) . (Continued) The Dannon Co. (FO 1) West Jordon, UT Salt Lake $ - WestFarm Foods (FO 135) Boise, ID Ada $ (0.30) 6. PRODUCER-HANDLER PLANTS (Sec. 1124.8(b) & .10) Graafstra Dairy, Inc. Arlington, WA Snohomish $ - d/b/a Country Charm Dairy Garn L. Gilbert, et al. Othello, WA Adams $ (0.15) d/b/a Country Morning Farms Edward and/or Aileen Brandsma Lynden, WA Whatcom $ - d/b/a Edaleen Dairy Faith Dairy, Inc. Tacoma, WA Pierce $ - Lochmead Farms, Inc. Junction City, OR Lane $ - d/b/a Lochmead Dairy Robert J. Mallorie, et al. Silverton, OR Marion $ - d/b/a Mallorie's Dairy, Inc. Noris Farms, Inc. Scio, OR Linn $ - Timothy H. and Susan Berndt North Bend, WA King $ - d/b/a Norman Brook Farm Smith Brothers Farms, Inc. Kent, WA King $ - 7. PARTIALLY REGULATED DISTRIBUTING PLANTS (Sec. 1124.8(c)) Alta-Dena Certified Dairy City of Industry, CA Los Angeles $ (0.25) Cacique Company City of Industry, CA Los Angeles $ (0.25) Dannon Milk Products Fort Worth, TX Tarrant $ 0.65 Farmdale Creamery, Inc. San Bernardino, CA San Bernardino $ 0.10 Heritage Foods, LLC Santa Ana, CA Orange $ 0.20 Model Dairy, Inc. Reno, NV Washoe $ (0.20) Morningstar Foods Gustine, CA Merced $ (0.20) Page 2 of 12 LIST OF PLANTS - JANUARY 1, 2002 PACIFIC NORTHWEST MARKETING AREA (FO 124) Order/ Loc. Type Name Location County Adj. 1/ NONPOOL PLANTS . (Continued) 8. OTHER NONPOOL PLANTS (Sec. 1124.8) Appel Farm Ferndale, WA Whatcom $ - Arctic Ice Cream Novelties, Inc. Seattle, WA King $ - Auburn Dairy Products, Inc. Auburn, WA King $ - Bandon Cheese, Inc. Bandon, OR Coos $ - Columbia River Processing, Inc. Boardman, OR Morrow $ (0.15) Commercial Creamery Spokane, WA Spokane $ - Country Classic Foods Bozeman, MT Gallatin $ (0.30) Dairy Farmers of America, Inc. Beaver, UT Beaver $ (0.30) Dairy Farmers of America, Inc. Smithfield, UT Cache $ - Deluxe Ice Cream Salem, OR Marion $ - Dutch Girl Ice Cream Eugene, OR Lane $ - Franz Bakery (CFPE) Portland, OR Multnomah $ - Gais Northwest Bakery (CFPE) Seattle, WA King $ - GFF, Inc. (CFPE) Los Angeles, CA Los Angeles $ (0.25) Glanbia Foods, Inc. Gooding, ID Gooding $ (0.30) Glanbia Foods, Inc. Twin Falls, ID Twin Falls $ (0.30) Good Humor Huntington, IN Huntington $ (0.10) Green Garden (CFPE) Kent, WA King $ - Howler Products (CFPE) San Francisco, CA San Francisco $ (0.10) Innovative Solutions, Inc. (CFPE) Bellevue, WA King $ - Kraft Foods Rupert, ID Minidoka $ (0.30) Larsen's Creamery Oregon City, OR Clackamas $ - Lite House Foods (CFPE) Sandpoint, ID Bonner $ - Matanuska Maid, Inc. Anchorage, AK N/A Meadow Gold Dairies, Inc. Billings, MT Yellowstone $ (0.30) Meadow Gold Dairies, Inc. Great Falls, MT Cascade $ (0.30) Meadow Gold Dairies, Inc. Kalispell, MT Flat Head $ (0.30) Pacific Foods of Oregon, Inc. Tualatin, OR Washington $ - Pleasant Valley Dairy Ferndale, WA Whatcom $ - Producers Dairy, Inc. Fresno, CA Fresno Queseria Bendita Yakima, WA Yakima $ (0.15) Rogue River Valley Creamery Central Point, OR Jackson $ - Rumiano Cheese Company Crescent City, CA Del Norte $ (0.10) Page 3 of 12 LIST OF PLANTS - JANUARY 1, 2002 PACIFIC NORTHWEST MARKETING AREA (FO 124) Order/ Loc. Type Name Location County Adj. 1/ NONPOOL PLANTS . (Continued) 8. OTHER NONPOOL PLANTS (Sec. 1124.8) . (Continued) Russells R&W Ice Cream Salt Lake City, UT Salt Lake $ - Safeway Stores, Inc. (Ice Cream Dept.) Bellevue, WA King $ - Schwartz Brothers Bakery (CFPE) Seattle, WA King $ - Snelgrove Ice Cream Salt Lake City, UT Salt Lake $ - Sorrento Lactalis, Inc. Nampa, ID Canyon $ (0.30) Springfield Creamery (Exempt) Eugene, OR Lane $ - Sunshine Dairy, Inc. (East) Portland, OR Multnomah $ - Tillamook County Creamery Association Tillamook, OR Tillamook $ - Valley Crest Foods, Inc. Myrtle Point, OR Coos $ - WestFarm Foods Chehalis, WA Lewis $ - WestFarm Foods Issaquah, WA King $ - WestFarm Foods Los Angeles, CA Los Angeles $ 0.20 WestFarm Foods Lynden, WA Whatcom $ - WestFarm Foods San Jose, CA Santa Clara WestFarm Foods Sunnyside, WA Yakima $ (0.15) WSU Creamery (Exempt) Pullman, WA Whitman $ - CFPE - Commercial Food Processing Establishment (Class II). Page 4 of 12 LIST OF PLANTS - JANUARY 1, 2002 PACIFIC NORTHWEST MARKETING AREA (FO 124) Order/ Loc. Type Name Location County Adj. 1/ COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATIONS 9. COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATIONS QUALIFIED PURSUANT TO SEC. 1124.18 Dairy Farmers of America, Inc. Kansas City, MO Farmers Cooperative Creamery McMinnville, OR Northwest Dairy Association Seattle, WA Northwest Independent Milk Producers Assn. Mount Vernon, WA Portland Independent Milk Producers Assn. Portland, OR Tillamook County Creamery Association Tillamook, OR COOPERATIVE RESERVE SUPPLY UNIT 10. COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATIONS QUALIFIED PURSUANT TO SEC. 1124.11 Northwest Independent Milk Producers Assn. Mount Vernon, WA Portland Independent Milk Producers Assn. Portland, OR 1/ Location adjustments are relative to King County, Washington, Class I differential of $1.90. Page 5 of 12 LIST OF PLANTS - JANUARY 1, 2002 ARIZONA-LAS VEGAS MARKETING AREA (FO 131) Order/ Loc. Type Name Location County Adj. 1/ POOL PLANTS 1. POOL DISTRIBUTING PLANTS (Sec. 1131.7(a or b)) Safeway Stores, Inc. Tempe, AZ Maricopa $ - Shamrock Foods Company Phoenix, AZ Maricopa $ - The Kroger Co., Tolleson Dairy Tolleson, AZ Maricopa $ - 3. COOPERATIVE POOL MANUFACTURING PLANTS (Sec. 1131.7(d)) United Dairymen of Arizona Tempe, AZ Maricopa $ - NONPOOL PLANTS 5. OTHER ORDER PLANTS DISTRIBUTING OR TRANSFERRING FLUID MILK PRODUCTS INTO THE MARKETING AREA (Sec. 1131.8(a)) Cream O' Weber, Inc. (FO 135) Salt Lake City, UT Salt Lake $ (0.45) Farmer's Dairy, Inc. (FO 126) El Paso, TX El Paso $ (0.10) Gossner Foods, Inc. (FO 135) Logan, UT Cache $ (0.45) Kohler Mix Specialties, Inc. (FO 30) White Bear Lake, MN Ramsey $ (0.65) Meadow Gold Dairies, Inc. (FO 135) Salt Lake City, UT Salt Lake $ (0.45) Morningstar Foods (FO 126) Sulphur Springs, TX Hopkins $ 0.65 Promised Land Dairy (FO 126) Floresville, TX Bexar $ 1.10 Ryan Foods Co. (FO 7) Murray, KY Calloway $ 0.05 Safeway Stores, Inc. (FO 32) Denver, CO Denver $ 0.20 Wilcox Dairy Farm LLC (FO 124) Cheney, WA Spokane $ (0.45) 6. PRODUCER-HANDLER PLANTS (Sec. 1131.8(b) & .10) Hettinga, Hein and Ellen d/b/a Sarah Farms Yuma, AZ Yuma $ (0.25) Sunrise Dairy Taylor, AZ Navajo $ (0.45) Page 6 of 12 LIST OF PLANTS - JANUARY 1, 2002 ARIZONA-LAS VEGAS MARKETING AREA (FO 131) Order/ Loc. Type Name Location County Adj. 1/ NONPOOL PLANTS . (Continued) 7. PARTIALLY REGULATED DISTRIBUTING PLANTS (Sec. 1131.8(c)) Adohr Farms South Gate, CA Los Angeles $ (0.25) Alta-Dena Certified Dairy City of Industry, CA Los Angeles $ (0.25) Cacique Company City of Industry, CA Los Angeles $ (0.25) Dannon Milk Products Fort Worth, TX Tarrant $ 0.65 Dean Foods of CA, Inc. Buena Park, CA Orange $ (0.25) Driftwood Dairy El Monte, CA Los Angeles $ (0.25) Farmdale Creamery, Inc. San Bernardino, CA San Bernardino $ (0.55) Heritage Foods, LLC Santa Ana, CA Orange $ (0.25) Jerseymaid Milk Products City of Commerce, CA Los Angeles $ (0.25) Model Dairy, Inc. Reno, NV Washoe $ (0.65) Morningstar Foods Gustine, CA Merced $ (0.65) Ralph's Grocery Compton, CA Los Angeles $ (0.25) Ralph's Grocery Riverside, CA Riverside $ (0.35) Rockview Farms Downey, CA Los Angeles $ (0.25) Santee Dairies, Inc. City of Industry, CA Los Angeles $ (0.25) Swiss Dairy Riverside, CA Riverside $ (0.35) Unified Western Grocers Los Angeles, CA Los Angeles $ (0.25) 8. OTHER NONPOOL PLANTS (Sec. 1131.8) 3D Cheese Delta, UT Millard $ (0.45) Alpura Cheese Alpura, Mexico Mexico N/A Americana Foods Dallas, TX Dallas $ 0.65 Anderson Dairy, Inc. 2/ Las Vegas, NV Clark $ (0.35) Dairy Concepts Pollock, SD Campbell $ (0.70) Dairy Farmers of America, Inc. Winnsboro, TX Wood $ 0.65 Dryers Ice Cream Plant Houston, TX Harris $ 1.25 Freeman Dairy (Exempt) Chandler, AZ Maricopa $ - Glanbia Foods, Inc. Gooding, ID Gooding $ (0.75) Grassland Dairy Greenwood, WI Clark $ (0.65) Heritage/Stremricks (Dasi Linda) Riverside, CA Riverside $ (0.35) Industias Lacteas Phoenix, AZ Maricopa $ - Instant Whip Phoenix, AZ Maricopa $ - Page 7 of 12 LIST OF PLANTS - JANUARY 1, 2002 ARIZONA-LAS VEGAS MARKETING AREA (FO 131) Order/ Loc.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Nez Perce Tribe Conducted a Year Long Community Monitoring
    Lewiston-Clarkston Valley Formaldehyde Study Page 1 of 10 Project Title: Lewiston – Clarkston Valley Formaldehyde Study (Community-Scale Monitoring) Applicant: Nez Perce Tribe Environmental Restoration & Waste Management Division Air Quality Program P.O. Box 365 Lapwai, ID 83540 Julie Simpson, Air Quality Program Coordinator phone 208.621.3818 fax 208.843.7411 [email protected] Funding Requested: $418,789 Total Project Cost: $418,789 Project Period: May 1, 2015 - April 30, 2018 DUNS number: 078208303 Lewiston-Clarkston Valley Formaldehyde Study Page 2 of 10 Basis and Rationale: Submitted to the Community-Scale Monitoring category, the proposed Lewiston- Clarkston (LC) Valley Formaldehyde (HCHO) Study will identify sources of elevated carbonyls found in the year long community monitoring assessment the Nez Perce Tribe (NPT) conducted in 2006/2007 in the Lewiston-Clarkston Valley (LC Valley) and on the Nez Perce Reservation in North Central Idaho. (http://www.nezperce.org/Official/Air%20Quality/Airtoxics/airtoxics.htm). Data analysis results and recommendations competed by Sonoma Technology, Inc. for the 2006/2007 study clearly identified the need for additional research (McCarthy et al, 2009): Concentrations of formaldehyde [HCHO] and acetaldehyde were much higher than expected for an area of Lewiston’s size. Because HCHO is the largest contributor to cancer risk among the pollutants measured and acetaldehyde is a significant contributor, this result is significant. Concentrations of HCHO and acetaldehyde were highest in the summer months but did not appear to be related to special events like large wildfires. Secondary production of HCHO and acetaldehyde are most likely to be responsible for the seasonal pattern but it is unclear why concentrations are higher in the Lewiston area than at other sites in the Inland Northwest.
    [Show full text]
  • Idaho PM Technical Note 2B (Revise): Plants for Pollinators in the Inland Northwest
    TECHNICAL NOTE USDA – Natural Resources Conservation Service Boise, Idaho - Spokane, Washington ______________________________________________________________________________ TN PLANT MATERIALS NO. 2B OCTOBER 2011 REVISION Plants for Pollinators in the Inland Northwest Dan Ogle, Plant Materials Specialist, NRCS, Boise, Idaho Pamela Pavek, Agronomist, NRCS Plant Materials Center, Pullman, Washington Richard Fleenor, Plant Materials Specialist, NRCS, Spokane, Washington Mark Stannard, Manager, NRCS Plant Materials Center, Pullman, Washington Tim Dring, State Biologist, NRCS, Spokane, Washington Jim Cane, Bee Biology and Systematics Lab, ARS, Logan, Utah Karen Fullen, State Biologist, NRCS, Boise, Idaho Loren St. John, Manager, NRCS Plant Materials Center, Aberdeen, Idaho Derek Tilley, Agronomist, NRCS Plant Materials Center, Aberdeen, Idaho Brownbelted bumble bee (Bombus griseocollis) visiting a blanketflower (Gaillardia aristata). Pamela Pavek The purpose of this Technical Note is to provide guidance for the design and implementation of conservation plantings to enhance habitat for pollinators including: bees, wasps, butterflies, moths and hummingbirds. Plant species included in this document are adapted to the Inland Northwest, which encompasses northern Idaho, northeastern Oregon and eastern Washington. For species adapted to southern Idaho, southeastern Oregon, northern Nevada and northern Utah, refer to Idaho Plant Materials Technical Note 2A. For lists of species adapted to western Washington and western Oregon, refer to the Oregon
    [Show full text]
  • Institutes for Higher Education Faculty:The Native American West
    Narrative Section of a Successful Application The attached document contains the grant narrative and selected portions of a previously-funded grant application. It is not intended to serve as a model, but to give you a sense of how a successful application may be crafted. Every successful application is different, and each applicant is urged to prepare a proposal that reflects its unique project and aspirations. Prospective applicants should consult the current Institutes guidelines, which reflect the most recent information and instructions, at https://www.neh.gov/grants/education/institutes-higher-education-faculty Applicants are also strongly encouraged to consult with the NEH Division of Education Programs staff well before a grant deadline. Note: The attachment only contains the grant narrative and selected portions, not the entire funded application. In addition, certain portions may have been redacted to protect the privacy interests of an individual and/or to protect confidential commercial and financial information and/or to protect copyrighted materials. Project Title: The Native American West: A Case Study of the Columbia Plateau Institution: Whitman College Project Directors: Laurie Arnold and Christopher Leise Grant Program: Institutes for Higher Education Faculty The Native American West: A Case Study of the Columbia Plateau Summer Institute for College and University Teachers Table of Contents 1. Narrative………………………………………………………………….1 2. Budget …………………………………………………………………..16 3. Appendices……………………………………………………………...18 A. Detailed
    [Show full text]
  • Beacon Community of the Inland Northwest (Spokane, WA)
    Beacon Community of the Inland Northwest (Spokane, WA) Overview and Goals The Beacon Community of the Inland Northwest (BCIN) is one of 17 Beacon Communities building and strengthening local health IT infrastructure and testing innovative approaches to make measurable improvements in health, care and cost. Meaningful Use of electronic health records (EHR) is the foundation of the exciting work in each community. Funded by the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, BCIN focuses on clinical practice transformation through a robust technology framework, clinical decision support tools, and care coordination to improve care for patients with type 2 diabetes in eastern Washington and north Idaho, the hospital referral region around Spokane, Washington. Patients in this largely rural region receive care at many different locations and from many different providers. BCIN is focused on: Improving regional outcomes for the type 2 diabetes population by integrating and coordinating care across clinical settings Implementing a comprehensive, regional approach to disease management, with standardized metrics and evidence-based clinical decision support tools Achieving optimal outcomes by leveraging IT applications that support information exchange, patient referrals, and coordinated care for patients with type 2 diabetes across a large geographical area Implementing a sustainable reimbursement model, linked in part to programs that reward community-level performance Partners BCIN’s major partners include: Community Choice, Eastern Washington Critical Access Hospital Network, Washington State Department of Health, and the Washington Academy of Family Physicians. Last Update: October 25, 2012 1 Beacon Community of the Inland Northwest Background “Beacon Community of Inland Northwest has provided us the ability to keep our Total grant award $15,702,479 over 3 years primary care physicians involved in the Lead grantee Inland Northwest Health overall care, and that provides better Services care-more coordinated care.
    [Show full text]
  • September 30, 2009
    Final Report Nez Perce National Air Toxics Program Characterization of Air Toxics Concentrations around a Kraft Pulp and Paper Mill Facility, Lewiston, Idaho EPA Assistance ID No. XA-97079001-3 Nez Perce Tribe Environmental Restoration and Waste Management Division Air Quality Program September 30, 2009 1 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Purpose of Study………………………………………………………………………………… 5 Methods…………………………………………………………………………………………. 8 Monitoring and Network Design………………………………………………………… 8 Sampling Analysis Methods…………………………………………………………….. 10 Carbonyls Monitoring and Analysis…………………………………………….. 11 PM-10 Monitoring and Analysis………………………………………………… 11 Metals Monitoring and Analysis………………………………………………... 11 VOC Monitoring and Analysis………………………………………………….. 11 Formaldehyde Special Study (DOAS)………………………………………….. 11 Emission Tracking with a Mobile Laboratory (PTR-MS)………………………. 12 Emissions Inventory…………………………………………………………………….. 12 Modeling………………………………………………………………………………… 12 Data and Risk Analysis…………………………………………………………………. 12 Results…………………………………………………………………………………………… 13 Sample Analysis………………………………………………………………………… 13 Formaldehyde Special Study (DOAS)………………………………………………….. 13 Emission Tracking with a Mobile Laboratory (PTR-MS)……………………………… 13 Modeling………………………………………………………………………………… 14 CMAQ…………………………………………………………………………… 14 CALPUFF………………………………………………………………………. 17 Risk Analysis – BCEH/ATSDR………………………………………………………… 18 Acute and Chronic Risks………………………………………………………… 19 Cancer Risks…………………………………………………………………….. 19 Recommendations……………………………………………………………….. 22 Data Analysis
    [Show full text]
  • HRCCWPP 2013 Draft1.1
    Table of Contents Introduction ..............................................................................................................7 Vision ..............................................................................................................8 Goals ...............................................................................................................9 Purpose ............................................................................................................9 Who 9 What 10 Where ............................................................................................................10 Why 10 When .............................................................................................................10 How 11 Organization ..................................................................................................11 Funding .........................................................................................................12 Impetus and Planning Steps ...................................................................................14 Policies and Tools .........................................................................................14 Defining the Wildland/Urban Interface ........................................................16 Planning Steps ...............................................................................................17 The 2005 Hood River CWPP Planning Process ...........................................18 Hood River CWPP Update Process ..............................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • ROSES of the INLAND PACIFIC NORTHWEST Native and Invasive Species Identification, Biology and Control
    TECHNICAL NOTE _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ USDA – Natural Resources Conservation Service Spokane, Washington __________________________________________________________________________________________ Plant Materials Technical Note No. 21 April 2013 ROSES OF THE INLAND PACIFIC NORTHWEST Native and Invasive Species Identification, Biology and Control Pamela L.S. Pavek, Agronomist, NRCS Plant Materials Center, Pullman, Washington David M. Skinner, Farmer (retired), NRCS Plant Materials Center, Pullman, Washington Nootka rose (Rosa nutkana) flower. Ben Legler, University of Washington Burke Herbarium The purpose of this Technical Note is to provide information about roses in the Inland Pacific Northwest, which is comprised of eastern Washington, eastern Oregon, and northern Idaho. Keys and comparison charts are provided for identification, detailed information is presented for each species, and methods for control are outlined for invasive species. ROSES OF THE INLAND NORTHWEST TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION____________________________________________________________________________________________3 IDENTIFICATION___________________________________________________________________________________________3 Adapted taxonomic key___________________________________________________________________________4 Table 1. Characteristics of Roses in the Inland Northwest_____________________________________5 INVASIVE ROSES____________________________________________________________________________________________6
    [Show full text]
  • A Remarkable Garden: David Douglas on the Shrub-Steppe of The
    A Remarkable Garden David Douglas and the Shrub-steppe of the Columbia Plateau JACK NISBET 210 Rock Garden Quarterly Vol. 70 (3) IN LATE JUNE of 1825, Scottish naturalist David Douglas took his first peek at the arid world of the Inland Northwest. Traveling upstream on the Columbia River with a canoe brigade of fur agents and their season’s trade goods, he ventured through the Columbia Gorge and stepped ashore for the long portage between the two great rapids known as the Dalles and Celilo Falls. Like most first-time visitors, he was shocked at the scale of the massive basalt flows that hung over the Gorge, then stunned by the desiccated landscape that stretched off endlessly to the east. “Nothing but extensive plains and barren hills, with the greater part of the herbage scorched and dead by the intense heat,” he wrote in his journal. Despite such heat, the energetic Douglas picked up some wonderful plants during his hike between the rapids, including a sunny yellow blazing star (Mentzelia laevicaulis) that provided him with ripe seeds to ship back to England. He dug up two different kinds of evening primrose in flower that he transplanted into his turnip patch at Fort Vancouver, hoping to gather seeds from them as well. And he discovered enough mature samples of Clarkia pulchella, already named after explorer William Clark but not yet cultivated outside its native ground, to turn it into one of the hottest garden offerings at London's Royal Horticultural Society’s 1828 summer plant sale. 211 Born in 1799 in the village of Scone, Perthshire, as the son of a stonemason, Douglas’s behavior at the local school gave little indication that he might be destined for anything greater than fishing, the care of abandoned birds, and rambling in the nearby hills.
    [Show full text]
  • EB1579-Landscape Plants for the Inland Northwest Excerpt
    EB1579 Landscape Plants for the Inland Northwest Including Native and Adapted Plants Tonie Fitzgerald Sydney McCrea Diane Notske Melissa Burtt Jim Flott Mike Terrell, ASLA 24 Groundcovers GROUNDCOVERS Achillea tomentosa Evergreen Groundcover 8" S Woolly Yarrow Non-native Zone: 2 Comments: Soil adaptable. Good for dry, exposed locations. Fire retardent, fernlike leaves are light olive green. Flat clusters of yellow flowers cover foliage in spring. Remove faded flowers. Space 6" to 12" apart. Aegopodium podagraria Deciduous Groundcover 12" S/PSH/SH Bishop’s Weed or Gout Weed Non-native Zone: 4 Comments: Soil adaptable. Good for difficult growing situations, but can become invasive and hard to control. ‘Variegata’ leaves are gray-green edged with white. Space clumps 18"–24" apart. Ajuga reptans Evergreen Groundcover 9" S/PSH/SH Ajuga or Carpet Bugle Non-native Zone: 4 Comments: Adaptable, but grows best in moist, well-drained soil with sun or partial sun. There are varieties with green, bronze, or plum-colored leaves with blue flower spikes, though some varieties have white flowers. The flowers rise 4"–6" above the foliage in late spring. Remove or mow them after flowering. Fast growing. Space 6"–12" apart for groundcover. Anemone sylvestris Deciduous Groundcover 12" PSH Snowdrop Anemone Non-native Zone: 2 Comments: Soil adaptable, but prefers moist, well drained conditions. Avoid wet clay soils, which encourage root rot. Attractive foliage. White, nodding, fragrant flowers bloom in late April through July. Limited availability, usually through catalogs. Can be started from seed. Space 12" apart. Arctostaphylos uva-ursi Evergreen Groundcover 12" S/PSH Kinnikinnick Native Zone: 2 Comments: Likes poor, sandy soils, Slow to establish, but eventually forms sturdy mats of small, glossy green leaves with bright red-orange berries.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Vulnerability and Adaptation in the Columbia River Gorge, Mount Hood National Forest, and Willamette National Forest
    Climate Change Vulnerability and Adaptation in the Columbia River Gorge, Mount Hood National Forest, and Willamette National Forest Editors Jessica E. Halofsky is the director of the Northwest Climate Hub and Western Wildland Environmental Threat Assessment Center, Pacific Northwest Research Station, 3625 93rd Avenue SW, Olympia, WA 98512; David L. Peterson is a professor, University of Washington, College of the Environment, School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, Box 352100, Seattle, WA 98195-2100; Rebecca A. Gravenmier is a science coordinator and regional climate change coordinator, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station and Pacific Northwest Region, 1220 SW 3rd Avenue, Portland, OR 97204. 1 Climate Change Vulnerability and Adaptation in Columbia River Gorge, Mount Hood National Forest, and Willamette National Forest Jessica E. Halofsky, David L. Peterson, and Rebecca A. Gravenmier Editors U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Portland, Oregon General Technical Report PNW-GTR-xxx Month year 2 Abstract Halofsky, Jessica E.; Peterson, David L.; Gravenmier, Rebecca A., eds. 2020. Climate change vulnerability and adaptation in the Columbia River Gorge, Mount Hood National Forest, and Willamette National Forest. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-xxx. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. Xxx p. A science-management partnership was developed to identify climate change issues relevant for resource management in Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area, Mount Hood National Forest, and Willamette National Forest (abbreviated as CMW Adaptation Partnership, or CMWAP). This partnership assessed the vulnerability of natural resources to climate change, and developed adaptation options that minimize negative impacts of climate change and facilitate transition of ecosystems and organizations to a warmer climate.
    [Show full text]
  • Hardwood Plantations for the Inland Northwest
    Station Bulletin No. 57 November, 2018 Hardwood Plantations for the Inland Northwest Idaho Forest, Wildlife Yvonne C. Barkley and Range Experiment Station, Moscow, ID Director Dennis Becker About the Authors: Yvonne C. Barkley, Associate Extension Specialist - Forestry, University of Idaho Extension, Moscow, ID. Acknowledgments: Thank you to the following for a contributions and critical review of the original publication: Ronald L. Mahoney, Emeritus Professor and Extension Specialist - Forestry, University of Idaho Extension, Moscow, ID. R. Kasten Dumroese, Research Plant Physiologist/National Nursery Specialist, USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Moscow, ID. Randy Brooks, Professor and Extension Specialist - Forestry, University of Idaho Extension, Moscow, ID. Chris Schnepf, Professor and Area Extension Educator - Forestry, University of Idaho Extension, Coeur d’Alene, ID. Don Hanley, Professor and Extension Specialist - Forestry, Washington State University, Seattle, WA. Original graphic art by: Lorraine Ashland, Emeritus Staff, College of Natural Resources, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID. Publication design by: Yvonne C. Barkley, Associate Extension Specialist - Forestry, University of Idaho Extension, Moscow, ID. This publication was developed with support from the Renewable Resource Extension Act (RREA). 2 Hardwood Plantations for the Inland Northwest Yvonne C. Barkley High-value hardwoods - their beauty, strength, and 8.2. Deep, loose, well-drained soils without hardpan work ability are unmatched. The Inland Northwest, layers are best. Many hardwood species "drown" if also known as the Inland Empire, is an area of the planted on asites with that have standing water for Pacifi c Northwest centered on Spokane, Washington, more than one- to two-weeks per year. and includes the surrounding Columbia River basin and all of North Idaho.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating a Vision for the Future the Horsethief Lake
    The Horsethief Lake - Dalles Mt Ranch Master Planning Project Creating a vision for the future February 2003 Time well spent Washington State Parks needs your help! Agency staff have embarked upon a public planning process to guide future development and management of the Dalles Mountain Ranch property and Horsethief Lake State Park. To make sure that our planning reflects what is important to you, we ask that you look through this document, give it some thought, and let us know how we can make these parklands relevant to you. What’s in this document This document first provides a brief history of the parks and outlines the individual steps in the current master planning process. Then, it describes several possible scenarios, or planning directions, the agency has crafted to provide structure and direct the public participation process. Finally, for those interested in providing feedback, it describes how to contact us, how we will use the information you provide, and ultimately how final plan decisions will be made and by whom. The visible timescape Encapsulating the rich history of Dalles Mountain Ranch and Horsethief Lake State Park in a few short pages couldn’t possibly do justice to these amazing places. Everywhere one turns, visible features of the landscape tell the story of significant eras and events in the region’s natural and cultural history. Some stories relate natural phenomena on a fantastic scale while others tell of an ancient and prosperous native civilization. Still others attest to the courage and fortitude of early explorers and pioneers. Dalles Mountain Ranch and Horsethief Lake State Park have been shaped over the millennia by the Grand Ronde lava flows, eroding action of the Columbia River, and colossal ice age floods.
    [Show full text]