DOCSLIB.ORG

ULTRASOUND of the BREAST Bruno D. Fornage, MD The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ULTRASOUND of the BREAST Bruno D. Fornage, MD The ULTRASOUND OF THE BREAST Bruno D. Fornage, MD The University of Texas MO Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas The evaluation of breast diseases is based on physical examination and mammography. Sonography is the best adjunct to mammography at the present time. Technical considerations The superiority of hand-held transducers over water-path systems lies in their higher frequency and real-time capability. Because of their near field is wider and provides a better resolution, linear-array transducers are more effective than sector probes. 7.5-MHz probes are routinely used while a 5-MHz probe may be required to evaluate large breasts. The use of a stand-off pad allows examination of the skin and superficial tissues. Both breasts and axillae are examined. Normal ultrasound anatomy The skin appears as a thin layer of moderately echogenic tissue about 1 to 3 mm in thickness. The areola and the nipple are slightly hypoechoic. Cooper's ligament appears as echogenic'spicules indenting the hypoechoic subcutaneous fatty layer. The echogenicity of breast tissue varies according to the relative proportions of connective, epithelial, and fatty components. With high frequency transducers, lactiferous ducts can be identified. A deep fatty layer is seen anterior to the thoracic wall Benign pathologic conditions Fibrocvstic disease Fibrocystic disease comprises cysts, stromal (fibrous) hyperplasia. and proliferative fibrocystic disease which includes ductal epithelial hyperplasia, papillomatosis, lobular hyperplasia, and sclerosing adenosis. There is no specific sonographic pattern for proliferative fibrocystic disease. Cysts Typical cysts are sonolucent, well-circumscribed, and associated with distal sound beam enhancement. However, 20 to 30% of cysts do not fulfill all of the classic sonographic criteria, and some of them mimic a solid hypoechoic mass. A thickened wall is often seen in chronic or infected cysts. Inspissated cysts may either show some intemal echoes or present as anechoic structures. Sonography can display calcified deposits in the wall of chronic cysts. Fibroadenomas Typically, fibroadenomas present as hypoechoic, homogeneous masses with smooth (tabulated) margins. Rarely, fibroadenomas without calcifications cast a marked shadow. Internal calcifications are found in about 10% of fibroadenomas. Fibroadenomas are elongated with their greatest diameter parallel to the skin. Occasionally, small fibroadenomas surrounded by fat cannot be identified. Cystosarcoma Dhyllodes Cystosarcoma phyllodes, which may be either benign or malignant, is a rare variant of f ibroadenoma with a highly cellular, sarcoma-like stroma. It often presents as a fibroadenoma. Fluid-filled clefts and areas of necrosis can be seen. Abscesses Breast abscesses are rare except during lactation. They are frequently located in the retroareolar area. They usually appear as hypoechoic masses with occasional echogenic debris and gas bubbles. Margins are blurred and irregular. pat necrosis Fat necrosis usually develops after trauma. Architectural distortion -3 Y and calcifications render the lesion suspicious for malignancy on mammography. Sonography shows an id-defined hypoechoic area and biopsy is usually required to rule out malignancy. Oily cysts may appear as sonolucent areas. Quctal pathology Ductal ectasia is readily demonstrated with the use of high-resolution transducers. Intraductal papillomas are small tumors which are best demonstrated on galactography. Large papiltomas may appear on sonograms as nonspecific hypoechoic rounded masses. Because of their marked cellularity, papillomas may be at the origin of falsely suspicious results on fine-needle aspiration. Gynecomastia Sonographic patterns of gynecomastia have not been extensively evaluated. Sonography can differentiate focal from diffuse changes. Carcinomas With the use of state-of-the-art, hand-held equipment, masses as small as 1 cm in diameter are reliably identified on sonography. Whatever its histologic type, breast carcinoma usually appears as a focal hypoechoic mass, disrupting the smooth architecture of breast tissue planes. The margins are irregular and echotexture is nonhomogeneous. Acoustic shadowing is found in less than 50% of cases. Invasive carcinomas are associated with a d'jsmoplastic reaction made of fibrosis and edema, which appears as an ill-defined echogenic rim surrounding the hypoechoic malignant core. Clustered microcateifications can be depicted within hypoechoic tumors with the use of 7.5-MHz transducers. Unlike fibroadenomas, carcinomas are spheric or tend to grow antoroposteriorly with a length/ anteroposterior diameter ratio less than 1. About 10-15% of carcinomas present at, well-circumscribed nodules on both mammograms and sonograms. Of this group, medullary carcinomas are markedly hypoechoic with occasional distal acoustic enhancement. On occasions, sonography can demonstrate carcinomas not seen on mammograms particularly in dense breasts, breasts with postsurgical or postirradiation changes, or breasts with prosthetat. Sonography can also deted the rare intracystic carcinomas. i/ Doppíer analysis • Abnormal Doppler signals are detected mainly at the periphery of malignant tumors. Tumor size measurement Sonography has proved accurate in the measurement of the size of breast carcinomas. Follow-up measurements are essential in the evaluation of response to therapy. lymph nodes Sonography can visualize enlarged metastatic lymph nodes in the axilla, the infra- and supraclavicular areas, and along the internal mammary chains. They appear as hypoechoic rounded masses. Post-treatment patterns Postirradiation changes include skin thickening and an overall disorganization of breast architecture. In those patients, sonography still has the capability of detecting early recurrence. After surgery, deep scars may appear as stellate ochogenic patterns. A hematoma is commonly found in the weeks following surgical biopsy. Lymphoceles are not rare after an axillary lymph node dissection. Recurrences Mammography may be of limited value because of post-surgical or post-irradiation changes. A hypoechoic mass developing in a conservatively treated breast is suspicious for local recurrence and requires an US-guided fine-needle aspiration. Complementary roles of sonography and mammography Sonography and mammography are two different and complementary imaging techniques for the breast. Mammography is the gold standard for the detection of isolated microcalcifications and millimetric carcinomas. However, sonography with state-of-the-art equipment can visualize masses as small at 1 cm in diameter in almost every type of breast. The unique cross-sectional and real-time imaging capabilities of sonography make it the technique of choice for guidance of fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable breast masses while its role in pre- or intraoperative localization of such tumors is expanding. Major limitations of sonography include its operator dependence, the absence of global imaging of the breast, problems in reprodudbiKty, and its inability to delineate carcinomas less than 0.7-0.8 cm. It has to be determined whether breast sonography should be restricted to the evaluation of indeterminate densities on mammography or used more widely in symptomatic patients. For example, both mammography and sonography are performed systematical/ in symptomatic patients in Europe. Ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration of nonpalpable lesions now provides an effective alternative to follow-up mammograms in the case of indeterminate densities. It is important to reemphasize that state-of-the-art equipment and rigorous technique must be used while the limitations of the method should be kept in mind. References BASSETT LW., KIMME SMITH C, SUTHERLAND L.K., GOLD R.H.. SARTID., KING III W. Automated and hand-held breast US: ENed on patient management. Radiology, 1987,165. 103-108. BLOOMBERG T J., ÇHIVERS R.C., PRICE J.L- Real-time ultrasonic characteristics of the breast. CNn. Radfol.. 1984,35.21-27. BRUNETON J.N., CARAMELLA E.. HERY M.. AUBANEL D, MANZINO J.J.. PICARD J L A*iRary lymph node metastases in breast cancer: Preoperative detection with US. Radiology. 1986,158, 325-326. COLE-BEUGLET C. GOLDBERG BA, KURTZ AS.. PATCHEFSKY AS, SHABER G S, RUBIN C.S.- Clinical experience with a prototype reaMkne dedtoaled breast scanner. AJR. 1982.139. 909-911. COLE-BEUGLET C. KURTZ AA.,RUBMC^GOU)BERGB.B.-Ultrasound rnammography RaoKX. On. North Am., 1980,18.133-143. 3DQ H COLE BEUGLET C. SCHWARTZ G.F.. KURTZ A.B.. PATCHEFSKY AS. GOLDBERG B.B.- Ufrasound • mammography tor male breast enlargement. J. Ultrasound Med.. 1982.1.301-305. * B COLE BEUGLET C. SCHWARTZ G.. KURTZ AB.. PATCHEFSKY AS., GOLDBERG B.B, Ultrasound mammography for Hit augmented breast. Radtotogy. 1983.146.737-742. ' H R COLE BEUGLET C. SORIANO R-Z.. KURTZ AB.. GOLDBERG B.B.- Fibroadenoma of the breast: Sonomammography correlated with pathology In 122 patients. AJR. 1983.140.369-375. H COLE BEUGLET C. SORIANO RX. KURTZ A.B.. GOLDBERG B.B. UNrasound analysis of t04 primary breast carcinomas classified accordng to Nstopathotoglc type. Radtotogy. 1983.147. H 191-196. B COLE BEUGLET C. SORIANO R. KURTZ A.B.. MEYER J.E.. KOPANS D.B. GOLDBERG B B H Ultrasound, x-ray mammography, and histopaihotogy of cystosarcoma phyltoides. Radtotogy, in 1983.146.481-486. HI EGAN R.L, EGAN K.L- Automated water-path full-breast sonography: Correlation with histology th Of176 solid tostorts. AJR, 1984.143.499-507. HI FLEISCHER A.C., MUHLETALER C.A.. REYNOLDS V.H. el al- Palpable
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Breast Self-Examination Practices in Women Who
    Breast self-examination practices in women who have had a mastectomy by Carole H Crowell A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Nursing Montana State University © Copyright by Carole H Crowell (1990) Abstract: Research findings indicate that breast cancer mortality has not decreased significantly in the past decade. While research continues on the development of more effective therapies, techniques for early detection are presently receiving greater attention. The use of breast self-examination (BSE) has been emphasized in the media and professional literature but little emphasis has been placed on BSE for women who have had a mastectomy. The purposes of this study were to determine if women who have had breast surgery do breast self-examination and to describe barriers that block this behavior. An assumption was made that women who have had surgery for breast cancer do not examine their remaining breast tissue and scar site. A qualitative study was conducted using a grounded theory approach to explore and describe behavior of women who have had a mastectomy. Analytic strategies used for data analysis were the constant comparative method, theoretical sampling, open coding, memo writing, and recoding. A convenience sample of twelve informants was selected from a mastectomy support group located in a rural community in Montana. BSE was viewed as a health-promoting behavior and was found to relate to certain variables of Penders (1987) Health Promotion Model. Findings of this study indicate a majority of women perform BSE after their mastectomy but most do not examine their scar site.
    [Show full text]
  • 5. Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening
    5. EFFECTIVENESS OF BREAST CANCER SCREENING This section considers measures of screening Nevertheless, the performance of a screening quality and major beneficial and harmful programme should be monitored to identify and outcomes. Beneficial outcomes include reduc- remedy shortcomings before enough time has tions in deaths from breast cancer and in elapsed to enable observation of mortality effects. advanced-stage disease, and the main example of a harmful outcome is overdiagnosis of breast (a) Screening standards cancer. The absolute reduction in breast cancer The randomized trials performed during mortality achieved by a particular screening the past 30 years have enabled the suggestion programme is the most crucial indicator of of several indicators of quality assurance for a programme’s effectiveness. This may vary screening services (Day et al., 1989; Tabár et according to the risk of breast cancer death in al., 1992; Feig, 2007; Perry et al., 2008; Wilson the target population, the rate of participation & Liston, 2011), including screening participa- in screening programmes, and the time scale tion rates, rates of recall for assessment, rates observed (Duffy et al., 2013). The technical quality of percutaneous and surgical biopsy, and breast of the screening, in both radiographic and radio- cancer detection rates. Detection rates are often logical terms, also has an impact on breast cancer classified by invasive/in situ status, tumour size, mortality. The observational analysis of breast lymph-node status, and histological grade. cancer mortality and of a screening programme’s Table 5.1 and Table 5.2 show selected quality performance may be assessed against several standards developed in England by the National process indicators.
    [Show full text]
  • Breast Implant Classification with MR Imaging Correlation1
    (Radiographics. 2000;20:e1-e1.) © RSNA, 2000 Online Only Breast Implant Classification with MR Imaging Correlation1 Michael S. Middleton, PhD, MD and Michael P. McNamara, Jr, MD 1 From the Department of Radiology, 410 Dickinson St, San Diego, CA 92103-8749 (M.S.M.) and Case Western Reserve University, Breast Imaging Center MetroHealth Medical Center, 2500 MetroHealth Dr, Cleveland, OH 44109-1998 (M.P.M.). Received July 8, 1999; revision requested December 13; revision received and accepted December 21. Abstract Rupture is now recognized as an important and common complication of TOP breast implants. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is the most accurate Abstract method for evaluating implant integrity but requires an understanding of the LEARNING OBJECTIVES numerous variations in implant construction that are encountered clinically. Introduction To assist in diagnosis, the authors provide an MR-oriented breast implant Materials and Methods classification scheme based on data from 4,014 patients (>9,966 current or Description of Implant Types previous implants), the literature, and other primary documentation. This Discussion scheme consists of 14 implant types: 1) single-lumen silicone gel-filled, 2) Conclusions single-lumen gel-saline adjustable, 3) single-lumen saline-, dextran-, or References polyvinyl pyrrolodone-filled, 4) standard double-lumen, 5) reverse double-lumen, 6) reverse-adjustable double-lumen, 7) gel-gel double-lumen, 8) triple-lumen, 9) Cavon "cast gel", 10) custom, 11) solid pectus, 12) sponge (simple or compound), 13) sponge (adjustable), and 14) other. The MR imaging and mammographic appearance of many implant types is correlated with their actual appearance after explantation. A brief history of prosthetic breast augmentation and reconstruction is also provided to allow this classification method to be placed in historical perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • Film-Screen Mammography: Comparison of Views
    FILM-SCREEN MAMMOGRAPHY: COMPARISON OF VIEWS Lawrence W. Bassett, MD, Daniel H. Bunnell, MD, Richard H. Gold, MD, and Reza Jahanshahi, MS, Ill Los Angeles, California The authors performed oblique, mediolateral, The incidence of breast cancer in the United States is and cephalocaudal film-screen mammographic on the increase. Over 130,000 new cases are diagnosed views for all 9,662 patients examined at the each year.' Mammography is the only method proved UCLA Medical Center from January 1, 1980 to effective in detecting clinically occult breast cancer. December 31, 1985. In these patients, biopsies Support for mammographic screening is based on data yielded 172 cancers; 87 were nonpalpable. from past and ongoing mass screening programs in the There was a mammographic mass in 113, only United States and Europe, which have shown that calcifications in 38, and distortion or asymme- women undergoing periodic mammography may antici- try of breast parenchyma in 12. We retrospec- pate a one third reduction in their chance of dying from tively determined how each view contributed to breast cancer.2-3 Film-screen and xeromammography depiction of tumors: 125 cancers were seen on are the two generally accepted methods for performing all views, 10 on none, 11 on the oblique only, 4 on breast radiography.4 A survey conducted by the Amer- the mediolateral only, and 3 on the cepha- ican College of Radiology in 1986 indicated that the locaudal only. The remaining cancers were majority of radiologists were using film-screen mam- detected on various combinations of views. mography.5 For film-screen mammography, the breast is Cancers were missed in individual views usually imaged by directing the x-ray beam in a lateral, because of overlying dense tissue or because caudal, or lateral-oblique projection.
    [Show full text]
  • Abnormalities of the Breast
    Thaffium Scintigraphy in the Evaluation of Mass Abnormalities of the Breast Alan D. Waxman, Lalitha Ramanna, Leslie D. Memsic, Clarence E. Foster, Allan W. Silberman, Stewart H. Gleischman, R. James Brenner, Michael B. Brachman, Christopher J. Kuhar, and Joseph Yadegar Department ofNuclear Medicine, Surgery, and Radiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California tecting lesions in the dense or dysplastic breast (3,4). It Palpable mass abnormalities of the breast are often difficult has also been demonstrated that treatment of palpable to evaluate mammographically,especiallyin patients with breast masses may be adversely affected when the clinician fibrocystic change and dense breasts. The current study delays biopsy (5,6). Mann et al. demonstrated that a false evaluates 201T1scintigraphy as a potential test in detecting negative mammogram may cause a considerable delay in malignancyand in differentiatingmalignant from benign the decision to biopsy a patient subsequently shown to masses. Eighty-one female patients underwent thallium san have carcinoma of the breast (1). tigraphy of the breast because of palpable breast masses. An Patients who are in a high risk category for the devel additional 30 females with no palpable breast abnormalities opment ofbreast cancer (i.e., patients with a strong family were also studied using201TI.Of 44 patientswith palpable breastcarcinomas,42 carcinomas(96%) weredetectedusing history of breast cancer, patients with prior histologic 20111scintigraphy. Three of three patients had other primary evidence of cellular atypia, patients with a prior history of breastmalignanciesthat were also detected. In contrast,19 breast cancer who have undergone lumpectomy and radia patients with palpable breast abnormalities shown on biopsy tion therapy) may be difficult to evaluate and follow to be benignfibrocysticdiseaseprocesseswere not detect mammographically because of a dense fibroglandular pat able on thalliumstudies.Of two patientswith fat necrosis, tern of physical changes caused by radiation.
    [Show full text]
  • Automatic Mass Detection in Breast Using Deep Convolutional Neural Network and SVM Classifier Md
    Automatic Mass Detection in Breast Using Deep Convolutional Neural Network and SVM Classifier Md. Kamrul Hasan1,* and Tajwar Abrar Aleef1 1Erasmus Joint Master in Medical Imaging & Applications (MAIA), University of Girona, Girona, Spain *md-kamrul [email protected] ABSTRACT Mammography is the most widely used gold standard for screening breast cancer, where, mass detection is considered as the prominent step. Detecting mass in the breast is however an arduous problem as they usually have large variations between them in terms of shape, size, boundary, and texture. In this literature, the process of mass detection is automated with the use of transfer learning techniques of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks (DCNN). Pre-trained VGG19 network is used to extract features which are then followed by bagged decision tree for features selection and then a Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier is trained and used for classifying between the mass and non-mass. Area Under ROC Curve (AUC) is chosen as the performance metric, which is then maximized during classifier selection and hyper-parameter tuning. The robustness of the two selected type of classifiers, C-SVM and u-SVM, are investigated with extensive experiments before selecting the best performing classifier. All experiments in this paper were conducted using the INbreast dataset. The best AUC obtained from the experimental results is 0.994 +/- 0.003 i.e. [0.991, 0.997]. Our results conclude that by using pre-trained VGG19 network, high-level distinctive features can be extracted from Mammograms which when used with the proposed SVM classifier is able to robustly distinguish between the mass and non-mass present in breast.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Histories of Significant Medical Advances: Mammography
    Case Histories of Significant Medical Advances: Mammography Amar Bhidé Srikant Datar Katherine Stebbins Working Paper 20-002 Case Histories of Significant Medical Advances: Mammography Amar Bhidé Tufts University Srikant Datar Harvard Business School Katherine Stebbins Harvard Business School Working Paper 20-002 Copyright © 2019, 2020, 2021 by Amar Bhidé and Srikant Datar Working papers are in draft form. This working paper is distributed for purposes of comment and discussion only. It may not be reproduced without permission of the copyright holder. Copies of working papers are available from the author. Case Histories of Significant Medical Advances Mammography Amar Bhidé, Harvard Business School Srikant Datar, Harvard Business School Katherine Stebbins, Harvard Business School Abstract: We describe how the development of x-ray-based techniques and equipment (“mammography”) lead to widespread screening for breast cancer and enabled “minimally invasive” biopsies of breast tumors. Specifically, we chronicle how: 1) the protocols and equipment, developed from 1950-1980, established a foundation for mammography; 2) improvements and new rules, in the 1980s, broadened use; and 3) digitization in the 1990s created a platform for more safety and accuracy. Note: This case history, like the others in this series, is included in a list compiled by Victor Fuchs and Harold Sox (2001) of technologies produced (or significantly advanced) between 1975 and 2000 that internists in the United States said had had a major impact on patient care. The case histories focus on advances in the 20th century (i.e. before this millennium) in the United States, Europe, and Japan -- to the degree information was available to the researchers.
    [Show full text]
  • Breast Cancer Stage at Diagnosis and Survival Among Patients with Prior Breast Implants
    Breast Cancer Stage at Diagnosis and Survival among Patients with Prior Breast Implants Dennis Deapen, Dr.P.H., Ann Hamilton, Ph.D., Leslie Bernstein, Ph.D., and Garry S. Brody, M.D. Los Angeles, Calif. Longstanding concern exists regarding the potential indicated by clinical stage at diagnosis,8 reports for women with breast implants to experience delayed of case series are mixed, with both favorable9–12 detection of breast cancer. Furthermore, survival among 13,14 cosmetic breast implant patients who subsequently de- and unfavorable results. It has been specu- velop breast cancer is a concern. Since 1976, this institu- lated that breast cancers may be more aggres- tion has monitored cancer incidence in a cohort of 3182 sive among patients with breast implants than women who underwent cosmetic breast augmentation be- among those without,15 resulting in a poorer tween 1959 and 1981. The distributions of stage at diag- survival rate among implant patients. In a co- nosis and survival of the 37 women who subsequently developed in situ or invasive breast cancer were compared hort of more than 3000 augmentation mam- with the observed population distributions. The distribu- maplasty patients, we have observed 37 inci- tion of stage at diagnosis for cosmetic breast implant pa- dent breast cancer patients who were tients who subsequently developed breast cancer was vir- diagnosed before 1993. We compared the tually identical to that of all breast cancer patients in Los 5-year and individual year survival intervals of Angeles County who were of the same age and race, and were diagnosed during the same time period.
    [Show full text]
  • Breast Self-Examination: Historical Perspective and Current Progress
    Breast Self-Examination: Historical Perspective and Current Progress Sam C. Eggertsen, MD, and James J. Bergman, MD Seattle, Washington During its 30 years as an examination technique, breast self- examination (BSE) has developed from an idea proposed by a chapter of the American Cancer Society to a standard recom­ mendation of many health care professionals. While screening for breast carcinoma has been documented as a valuable un­ dertaking, a majority of the studies are concerned with physi­ cian examination and the use of xeromammography. BSE as an individual factor has not been adequately studied. Since several studies propose that BSE is indeed effective, while others refute that contention, the results of well-controlled prospective studies are needed. The current literature is at least supportive of BSE, which should be encouraged while controlled trials are analyzed. Breast self-examination (BSE) is a concept known about its early history. In 1947 Dr. A. M. endorsed by virtually all of those participating in Popma, with the Idaho Division of the American the field of preventive health care. Recommended Cancer Society (ACS), encouraged national distri­ for over 30 years as a self-examination technique, bution of a film on BSE, and in 1949 Haagensen it must withstand the tests of effectiveness to be persuaded the National Cancer Institute and the considered a part of contemporary health screen­ ACS to cooperate in making a teaching film.2 A film ing. Does the test do what it proposes? What are was produced for distribution in 1950 and described the risks and costs? What have studies determined in 1952.3 The two steps of the examination were regarding the effectiveness of BSE, and what inspection before the mirror and palpation while direction should studies take to make better de­ supine.
    [Show full text]
  • An Evaluation of Comparative Strategies for Teaching Breast Self- Examination
    Edith Cowan University Research Online Theses: Doctorates and Masters Theses 1-1-1991 An evaluation of comparative strategies for teaching breast self- examination Julia Agars Edith Cowan University Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses Part of the Other Nursing Commons Recommended Citation Agars, J. (1991). An evaluation of comparative strategies for teaching breast self-examination. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/1126 This Thesis is posted at Research Online. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/1126 Edith Cowan University Copyright Warning You may print or download ONE copy of this document for the purpose of your own research or study. The University does not authorize you to copy, communicate or otherwise make available electronically to any other person any copyright material contained on this site. You are reminded of the following: Copyright owners are entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. A reproduction of material that is protected by copyright may be a copyright infringement. Where the reproduction of such material is done without attribution of authorship, with false attribution of authorship or the authorship is treated in a derogatory manner, this may be a breach of the author’s moral rights contained in Part IX of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth). Courts have the power to impose a wide range of civil and criminal sanctions for infringement of copyright, infringement of moral rights and other offences under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth). Higher penalties may apply, and higher damages may be awarded, for offences and infringements involving the conversion of material into digital or electronic form.
    [Show full text]
  • Screen-Film Mammography
    Refer to: Sickles EA: Xeromammography versus screen-film mam- mography-Pros and cons of the two techniques (Infor- beams (40 to 50 kVp), produce satisfactory mam- mation). West J Med 134:273-274, Mar 1981 mograms without uniform-thickness breast com- pression and, therefore, can be used successfully Information with standard ceiling-mounted, general-purpose x-ray units (with few exceptions, screen-film tech- niques cannot). As a result, xeromammography is considerably more convenient and somewhat less expensive than screen-film techniques, especi- Xeromammography Versus ally for radiology departments or offices that do a low volume of mammography work. Screen-Film Mammography There are also inherent differences in image Pros and Cons of the Two Techniques quality between xeroradiographic and screen-film mammograms that merit discussion.1'3 The edge- EDWARD A. SICKLES, MD enhancement property unique to xeroradiog- San Francisco raphy facilitates the imaging of tiny breast cal- cifications, which may be the only indication, radiographic or otherwise, that breast cancer is XEROMAMMOGRAPHY and screen-film mammogra- present. Screen-film mammograms, on the other phy are the predominant techniques being used hand, have comparatively high inherent contrast, for the radiographic detection of breast cancer.' thereby facilitating the imaging of poorly defined Xeroradiography, a technique similar to the stan- breast masses, which also may be the only mani- dard photocopying process, works on the principle festation of carcinoma. Because approximately that x-rays partially dissipate a uniform electrical half of mammographically detectable cancer of charge applied to a selenium-alloy plate, thereby the breast presents with microcalcifications and producing a latent (electrostatic) radiographic the other half presents as poorly defined noncal- image, which is subsequently developed by dusting cified masses, there is no relative advantage to the plate with charged particles of (blue) plastic either technique, nor is it possible to know a powder.
    [Show full text]
  • Ultrasonographic Findings of Breast Diseases During Pregnancy and Lactating Period1
    Journ al of the Korean Radiol ogica l Society 1995 : 33(3) : 443- 447 Ultrasonographic Findings of Breast Diseases During Pregnancy and Lactating Period1 Yeon Hee Lee, M.D2., Yong Hyun Park, M.D., Tae Hee Kwon, M.D. Purpose: To evaluate ultrasonographic findingsand usefulness in the diagnosis of breast diseases during pregnancy and lactating period. Methods and Materials: The authors evaluated the ultrasonographic findings of 18 breast diseases during pregnancy and lactation retrospectively. The ultr­ asonographic examinations were performed with linear-array 5 MHz transducer (AT 니. Final diagnoses were obtained by the excisional biopsy, fine needle aspir­ ation and clinical follow-up. Results: Total 18 cases of breast diseases were consisted of 8 cases of gala­ ctocele, 4 cases of fibroadenoma, 3 cases ofaxillary accessory breast, 2 cases of lactating adenoma, and 1 case of phylloidestumor. The ultrasonographic findings of the above breast diseases were valuable in the diagnosis and therapeutic plan­ nlng. Conclusion: Ultrasonography is the initial and useful method of diagnosing breast diseases during pregnancy and lactating period. Index Words: Breast. US Breast neoplasms, US INTROCUCTION MATERIALS and METHODS During pregnancy, patients complain of breast dis­ The authors reviewed the ultrasonographic findings comfort, pain or mass but mammography cannot be of 18 breast lesions of 17 female patients retrospe­ taken due to possible radiation hazard to the fetus ctively. Mean age ofthe patients was 29.5 years and the After delivery, mammography of lactating breast is lim­ age range was 24 - 35 years. Five patients were preg­ ited in detecting a mass lesion due to hypertrophied, nant and 13 patients were postpartum within one year dense breast parencymal tissue which can mask the at the time of examination.
    [Show full text]