DOCSLIB.ORG

Mitochondrial Genome Evolution in Parasitic Plants

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mitochondrial Genome Evolution in Parasitic Plants CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Copenhagen University Research Information System Mitochondrial genome evolution in parasitic plants Zervas, Athanasios; Petersen, Gitte; Seberg, Ole Published in: BMC Evolutionary Biology DOI: 10.1186/s12862-019-1401-8 Publication date: 2019 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Document license: CC BY Citation for published version (APA): Zervas, A., Petersen, G., & Seberg, O. (2019). Mitochondrial genome evolution in parasitic plants. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 19, [87]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-019-1401-8 Download date: 09. Apr. 2020 Zervas et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology (2019) 19:87 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-019-1401-8 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Mitochondrial genome evolution in parasitic plants Athanasios Zervas* , Gitte Petersen and Ole Seberg Abstract Background: Parasitic plants rely on their host to cover their nutritional requirements either for their entire life or a smaller part of it. Depending on the level of parasitism, a proportional reduction on the plastid genome has been found. However, knowledge on gene loss and evolution of the mitogenome of parasitic plants is only available for four hemiparasitic Viscum species (Viscaceae), which lack many of the mitochondrial genes, while the remaining genes exhibit very fast molecular evolution rates. In this study, we include another genus, Phoradendron, from the Viscaceae, as well as 10 other hemiparasitic or holoparasitic taxa from across the phylogeny of the angiosperms to investigate how fast molecular evolution works on their mitogenomes, and the extent of gene loss. Results: Our observations from Viscum were replicated in Phoradendron liga, whereas the remaining parasitic plants in the study have a complete set of the core mitochondrial genes and exhibit moderate or only slightly raised substitution rates compared to most autotrophic taxa, without any statistically significant difference between the different groups (autotrophs, hemiparasites and holoparasites). Additionally, further evidence is provided for the placement of Balanophoraceae within the order Santalales, while the exact placement of Cynomoriaceae still remains elusive. Conclusions: Weexaminethemitochondrialgenecontentof11hemiparasitic and holoparasitic plants and confirm previous observations in Viscaceae. We show that the remaining parasitic plants do not have significantly higher substitution rates than autotrophic plants in their mitochondrial genes. We provide further evidence for the placement of Balanophoraceae in the Santalales. Keywords: Phylogeny, Parasitic plants, Substitution rates, Evolution, Parasitism, Balanophoraceae, Viscaceae, Mitogenome Background holoparasite Rafflesia lagascae Blanco [6], comparatively lit- Parasitic plants comprise around 1% of all angiosperm spe- tle attention has been given to mitochondrial evolution. cies (http://parasiticplants.siu.edu/ParPlantNumbers.pdf). The plastome of a typical, autotrophic angiosperm is cir- Depending on their photosynthetic ability, they are catego- cular, of a rather uniform size, and has a relatively con- rized as hemiparasites (facultative or obligatory) and holo- served structure, with two unique regions separated by parasites. Current phylogenetic evidence suggests that two inverted repeats, as well as a conserved gene content parasitism has evolved independently at least 12 times [1, of ca. 40 protein coding genes, four rRNA genes and ap- 2], offering an excellent framework for studies of correl- proximately 20 tRNA genes [7–9]. However, plastomes of ation between parasitism and genomic evolution. While a the numerous parasitic angiosperms that have been se- series of papers have recently focused on the correlation be- quenced show a pronounced variation both in size, struc- tween levels of parasitism and loss of key photosynthesis ture and gene content. Not unexpectedly, there is a clear genes in the plastome [3–5] and an instance of a possible correlation between the type of parasitism and the level of complete loss of the plastome has also been reported in the plastome reduction and modification, e.g. plastomes of the holoparasitic members of Orobanchaceae [10], Cus- cuta L. [3, 4], Pilostyles Guil. [11], Rafflesia lagascae [6], * Correspondence: [email protected] Hydnora visseri Bolin, E.Maass & Musselman [12], and The Natural History Museum of Denmark, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Sølvgade 83, opg. S, DK-1307 Copenhagen K, Denmark others, are much more reduced and modified than © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. Zervas et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology (2019) 19:87 Page 2 of 14 plastomes of hemiparasitic members of Orobanchaceae autotrophic land plants [23], while the remaining genes [5] and Viscaceae [13]. Similar evolutionary plastome re- comprise a variable part of the plant mitogenome. This ductions have been described in achlorophyllous mycohe- was also observed in the holoparasitic plants Rafflesia terotrophic plants, which have either functionally or lagascae [6] and Cynomorium coccineum [24], and simi- completely lost most or all genes involved in photosyn- lar results have been reported for three hemiparasitic thesis, e.g., Neottia nidus-avis (L.) Rich. [14], Corallorhiza and three holoparasitic Orobanchaceae, all of which pos- striata Lindl. [15], Petrosavia stellaris Becc. [16], and sev- sessed a complete core mitochondrial gene set [25]. eral members of Ericaceae [17]. In hemiparasitic plants, However, recent studies on four species of Viscum capable of photosynthesis, major plastome reductions showed a surprising reduction in gene content compared would not be expected, but nevertheless a recent study of to all other known angiosperm mitogenomes [26, 27]. the Santalales, and specifically on the hemiparasitic genera This observation prompts the obvious question, whether Osyris L. and Viscum showed that their plastomes are re- a loss of genes in the mitogenome similar to that ob- duced by 10–22% compared to Vitis [13]theclosestauto- served in the Viscaceae is found in other parasitic line- trophicrelativesequenced. ages as well. Evolution of the mitochondrial genomes, henceforth In addition to extensive gene loss, a very high level of se- mitogenomes, which are involved in basic cell metabol- quence divergence of the remaining key genes was also ism, was not expected to be influenced by parasitism. observed in the four species of Viscum [26, 27]. Especially Mitochondria are essential producers of the energy the genes in respiratory complex V, atp1, apt6, atp8, and (ATP) of the cell and harbour key metabolic genes that atp9, have very high substitution rates compared to other control respiration, stress responses, and additionally plants. However, a few genes, e.g. matR in V. album L., re- defence against microorganisms and aspects of pro- tain a low substitution rate. In general, mitochondrial ge- grammed cell apoptosis. Compared to plant mitochon- nomes have low substitution rates, lower than what is drial genomes, animal mitochondrial genomes are in found in the chloroplast genomes, and 10–20 times lower general fairly small in size (ca. 16 kb long), uniform in compared to the plant nuclear genomes [28]. Often, structure (circular) and gene content, encoding 22 tRNA higher substitution rates in the mitogenome are accom- genes, two rRNA genes and usually 13 protein coding panied by higher substitution rates in the other two plant genes of the respiratory chain complexes I: nad1, nad2, genomes, and are inferred to be a characteristic of the spe- nad3, nad4, nad4L, nad5, nad6, III: cob,IV:cox1, cox2, cies that exhibits them, e.g. in certain species of Plantago cox3, and V: atp6,andatp8 [18]. In contrast, plant mito- L. [29]. However, it has been shown later that certain plant genomes exhibit profound differences: Their size is 10 to genera, like Pelargonium L. H. Bailey, have high substitu- almost 1000 times larger than their animal counterparts, tion rates only in their mitogenomes [30]. Comparison of ranging from less than 200 kb to some 11.3 mb as in the nuclear small-subunit rDNA from partially autotrophic, case of Silene conica L. [19]. This has been partly attrib- chlorophyllous hemiparasites, and achlorophyllous holo- uted to the presence of larger introns, of more repeated parasites showed that the latter have much higher substi- sequences, and stretches of DNA transferred either from tution rates than the former [31]. Higher chloroplast the nuclear and chloroplast genome, or from bacteria substitution rates have been suggested to be correlated and viruses that have infected the plant [19, 20]. Elec- with species richness, as in the case of the Proteaceae [32]. tron microscopy and DNA sequencing has revealed that Early theoretical models have suggested that parasites plant mitogenomes may be circular, linear, branching should evolve much faster than their hosts as a response and comprising one or more molecules,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Subalpine Meadows of Mount Rainier • an Elevational Zone Just Below Timberline but Above the Reach of More Or Less Continuous Tree Or Shrub Cover
    Sub-Alpine/Alpine Zones and Flowers of Mt Rainier Lecturer: Cindy Luksus What We Are Going To Cover • Climate, Forest and Plant Communities of Mt Rainier • Common Flowers, Shrubs and Trees in Sub- Alpine and Alpine Zones by Family 1) Figwort Family 2) Saxifrage Family 3) Rose Family 4) Heath Family 5) Special mentions • Suggested Readings and Concluding Statements Climate of Mt Rainier • The location of the Park is on the west side of the Cascade Divide, but because it is so massive it produces its own rain shadow. • Most moisture is dropped on the south and west sides, while the northeast side can be comparatively dry. • Special microclimates result from unique interactions of landforms and weather patterns. • Knowing the amount of snow/rainfall and how the unique microclimates affect the vegetation will give you an idea of what will thrive in the area you visit. Forest and Plant Communities of Mt Rainier • The zones show regular patterns that result in “associations” of certain shrubs and herbs relating to the dominant, climax tree species. • The nature of the understory vegetation is largely determined by the amount of moisture available and the microclimates that exist. Forest Zones of Mt Rainier • Western Hemlock Zone – below 3,000 ft • Silver Fir Zone – between 2,500 and 4,700 ft • Mountain Hemlock Zone – above 4,000 ft Since most of the field trips will start above 4,000 ft we will only discuss plants found in the Mountain Hemlock Zone and above. This zone includes the Sub-Alpine and Alpine Plant communities. Forest and Plant Communities of Mt Rainier Subalpine Meadows of Mount Rainier • An elevational zone just below timberline but above the reach of more or less continuous tree or shrub cover.
    [Show full text]
  • Stace Edition 4: Changes
    STACE EDITION 4: CHANGES NOTES Changes to the textual content of keys and species accounts are not covered. "Mention" implies that the taxon is or was given summary treatment at the head of a family, family division or genus (just after the key if there is one). "Reference" implies that the taxon is or was given summary treatment inline in the accounts for a genus. "Account" implies that the taxon is or was given a numbered account inline in the numbered treatments within a genus. "Key" means key at species / infraspecific level unless otherwise qualified. "Added" against an account, mention or reference implies that no treatment was given in Edition 3. "Given" against an account, mention or reference implies that this replaces a less full or prominent treatment in Stace 3. “Reduced to” against an account or reference implies that this replaces a fuller or more prominent treatment in Stace 3. GENERAL Family order changed in the Malpighiales Family order changed in the Cornales Order Boraginales introduced, with families Hydrophyllaceae and Boraginaceae Family order changed in the Lamiales BY FAMILY 1 LYCOPODIACEAE 4 DIPHASIASTRUM Key added. D. complanatum => D. x issleri D. tristachyum keyed and account added. 5 EQUISETACEAE 1 EQUISETUM Key expanded. E. x meridionale added to key and given account. 7 HYMENOPHYLLACEAE 1 HYMENOPHYLLUM H. x scopulorum given reference. 11 DENNSTAEDTIACEAE 2 HYPOLEPIS added. Genus account added. Issue 7: 26 December 2019 Page 1 of 35 Stace edition 4 changes H. ambigua: account added. 13 CYSTOPTERIDACEAE Takes on Gymnocarpium, Cystopteris from Woodsiaceae. 2 CYSTOPTERIS C. fragilis ssp. fragilis: account added.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 What Is a Plant?
    OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 02/17/12, SPi C h a p t e r 1 What is a plant? Plants, like love, are easier to recognize than to defi ne. At the entrance to many areas of outstanding natural beauty in England can be seen a sign that asks visitors to avoid ‘damaging trees and plants’. It is fair to ask in what way is a tree not a plant. A plant is often defi ned simply as a green, immobile organism that is able to feed itself (autotrophic) using photosynthesis. This is a heuristic defi nition for plants that can be refi ned if some more characters are added. Sometimes plants are described as organisms with the following combination of features: 1) the possession of chlorophyll and the ability to photosynthesize sugar from water and carbon dioxide; 2) a rigid cell wall made of cellulose; 3) storage of energy as carbohydrate and often as starch; 4) unlimited growth from an area of dividing and differentiating tissue known as a meristem; 5) cells with a relatively large vacuole fi lled with watery sap. So trees are clearly plants, and it is not diffi cult to think of other organisms that are unequivocally plants even though they lack one or more of these characteristics. For example, the orchid Corallorhiza wisteriana has the fl owers of an orchid, produces tiny seeds typical of the family Orchidaceae, and has the vascular tissue that you fi nd in the majority of land plants. However, what 1 OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 02/17/12, SPi it does not have are green leaves, because this orchid is mycotrophic, meaning that it lives off fungi which themselves derive their energy from decaying material in the forest fl oor.
    [Show full text]
  • The Plant Press the ARIZONA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY
    The Plant Press THE ARIZONA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY Volume 36, Number 1 Summer 2013 In this Issue: Plants of the Madrean Archipelago 1-4 Floras in the Madrean Archipelago Conference 5-8 Abstracts of Botanical Papers Presented in the Madrean Archipelago Conference Southwest Coralbean (Erythrina flabelliformis). Plus 11-19 Conservation Priority Floras in the Madrean Archipelago Setting for Arizona G1 Conference and G2 Plant Species: A Regional Assessment by Thomas R. Van Devender1. Photos courtesy the author. & Our Regular Features Today the term ‘bioblitz’ is popular, meaning an intensive effort in a short period to document the diversity of animals and plants in an area. The first bioblitz in the southwestern 2 President’s Note United States was the 1848-1855 survey of the new boundary between the United States and Mexico after the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo of 1848 ended the Mexican-American War. 8 Who’s Who at AZNPS The border between El Paso, Texas and the Colorado River in Arizona was surveyed in 1855- 9 & 17 Book Reviews 1856, following the Gadsden Purchase in 1853. Besides surveying and marking the border with monuments, these were expeditions that made extensive animal and plant collections, 10 Spotlight on a Native often by U.S. Army physicians. Botanists John M. Bigelow (Charphochaete bigelovii), Charles Plant C. Parry (Agave parryi), Arthur C. V. Schott (Stephanomeria schotti), Edmund K. Smith (Rhamnus smithii), George Thurber (Stenocereus thurberi), and Charles Wright (Cheilanthes wrightii) made the first systematic plant collection in the Arizona-Sonora borderlands. ©2013 Arizona Native Plant In 1892-94, Edgar A. Mearns collected 30,000 animal and plant specimens on the second Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Cassytha Pubescens
    Cassytha pubescens: Germination biology and interactions with native and introduced hosts Hong Tai (Steven), Tsang B.Sc. Hons (University of Adelaide) Thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Science School of Earth & Environmental Science University of Adelaide, Australia 03/05/2010 i Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................... ii Abstract .......................................................................................................................... v Declaration ................................................................................................................... vii Acknowledgements .................................................................................................... viii Chapter. 1 Introduction .................................................................................................. 1 1.1 General Introduction ............................................................................................ 1 1.2 Literature Review ................................................................................................. 3 1.2.1 Characteristics of parasitic control agents .................................................... 3 1.2.2. Direct impacts on hosts ................................................................................ 7 1.2.3. Indirect impacts on hosts ............................................................................. 8 1.2.4. Summary ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations
    Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations Revised Report and Documentation Prepared for: Department of Defense U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Submitted by: January 2004 Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations: Revised Report and Documentation CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary..........................................................................................iii 2.0 Introduction – Project Description................................................................. 1 3.0 Methods ................................................................................................................ 3 3.1 NatureServe Data................................................................................................ 3 3.2 DOD Installations............................................................................................... 5 3.3 Species at Risk .................................................................................................... 6 4.0 Results................................................................................................................... 8 4.1 Nationwide Assessment of Species at Risk on DOD Installations..................... 8 4.2 Assessment of Species at Risk by Military Service.......................................... 13 4.3 Assessment of Species at Risk on Installations ................................................ 15 5.0 Conclusion and Management Recommendations.................................... 22 6.0 Future Directions.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Methods Results
    Papers and Proceedings Royal Society ofTasmania, Volume 1999 103 THE CHARACTERISTICS AND MANAGEMENT PROBLEMS OF THE VEGETATION AND FLORA OF THE HUNTINGFIELD AREA, SOUTHERN TASMANIA by J.B. Kirkpatrick (with two tables, four text-figures and one appendix) KIRKPATRICK, J.B., 1999 (31:x): The characteristics and management problems of the vegetation and flora of the Huntingfield area, southern Tasmania. Pap. Proc. R. Soc. Tasm. 133(1): 103-113. ISSN 0080-4703. School of Geography and Environmental Studies, University ofTasmania, GPO Box 252-78, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia 7001. The Huntingfield area has a varied vegetation, including substantial areas ofEucalyptus amygdalina heathy woodland, heath, buttongrass moorland and E. amygdalina shrubbyforest, with smaller areas ofwetland, grassland and E. ovata shrubbyforest. Six floristic communities are described for the area. Two hundred and one native vascular plant taxa, 26 moss species and ten liverworts are known from the area, which is particularly rich in orchids, two ofwhich are rare in Tasmania. Four other plant species are known to be rare and/or unreserved inTasmania. Sixty-four exotic plantspecies have been observed in the area, most ofwhich do not threaten the native biodiversity. However, a group offire-adapted shrubs are potentially serious invaders. Management problems in the area include the maintenance ofopen areas, weed invasion, pathogen invasion, introduced animals, fire, mechanised recreation, drainage from houses and roads, rubbish dumping and the gathering offirewood, sand and plants. Key Words: flora, forest, heath, Huntingfield, management, Tasmania, vegetation, wetland, woodland. INTRODUCTION species with the most cover in the shrub stratum (dominant species) was noted. If another species had more than half The Huntingfield Estate, approximately 400 ha of forest, the cover ofthe dominant one it was noted as a codominant.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards an Updated Checklist of the Libyan Flora
    Towards an updated checklist of the Libyan flora Article Published Version Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0 (CC-BY) Open access Gawhari, A. M. H., Jury, S. L. and Culham, A. (2018) Towards an updated checklist of the Libyan flora. Phytotaxa, 338 (1). pp. 1-16. ISSN 1179-3155 doi: https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.338.1.1 Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/76559/ It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. See Guidance on citing . Published version at: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.338.1.1 Identification Number/DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.338.1.1 <https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.338.1.1> Publisher: Magnolia Press All outputs in CentAUR are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including copyright law. Copyright and IPR is retained by the creators or other copyright holders. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the End User Agreement . www.reading.ac.uk/centaur CentAUR Central Archive at the University of Reading Reading’s research outputs online Phytotaxa 338 (1): 001–016 ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/pt/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2018 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.338.1.1 Towards an updated checklist of the Libyan flora AHMED M. H. GAWHARI1, 2, STEPHEN L. JURY 2 & ALASTAIR CULHAM 2 1 Botany Department, Cyrenaica Herbarium, Faculty of Sciences, University of Benghazi, Benghazi, Libya E-mail: [email protected] 2 University of Reading Herbarium, The Harborne Building, School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Read- ing, RG6 6AS, U.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Room with a View David Jewell
    ©Matt Pringle Room with a view David Jewell ew can enjoy such and both noteworthy subtle-pink, and a chocolate- F an interesting and champion trees. Nearby, with brown Forrest collection aesthetically pleasing view a vertical bole, fissured trunk (Forr 15381) (figs 3 & 4). A from their office window as and mop-headed crown, fine shrubby birch,B. calcicola I do: from Jermyn’s house at Pinus engelmanii (figs 1 & 2) (fig. 5), deserves closer the Sir Harold Hillier Gardens, is a personal favourite; from inspection. It has an upright I have an aerial view of the Mexico, its evergreen, rough, habit, stout twigs and pointed Magnolia Avenue surrounded needle-like foliage is almost leaves with sixteen or more by woody plants established 25cm long. It twists and turns pairs of closely spaced here more than 50 years ago during windy weather and in impressed veins. Collected from around the world. winter, when the rest of the by plantsman Roy Lancaster, To my right are two fine garden is laid bare, it is majestic! it was found growing in examples of narrow-columned The area includes different limestone crevices in the Jade Dawyck beech trees, one forms of the Himalayan birch, Dragon Mountains of north purple and the other golden, Betula utilis, in shades of white, western Yunnan. To the left a dome of pale foliage rises above the avenue to reveal the Katsura tree from Japan, ©Matt Pringle ©Matt Pringle Cercidyphyllum japonicum; in autumn its foliage turns yellow to smokey pink and the candy-floss scent carries well on the lightest breeze.
    [Show full text]
  • Report 5-12 May 2019
    Corsica - The Scented Isle Naturetrek Tour Report 5 - 12 May 2019 Anemone hortensis Lac de Melo Tralonca Cytinus hypocistis subsp. clusii Report & Images by David Tattersfield Naturetrek Mingledown Barn Wolf's Lane Chawton Alton Hampshire GU34 3HJ UK T: +44 (0)1962 733051 E: [email protected] W: www.naturetrek.co.uk Tour Report Corsica - The Scented Isle Tour participants: David Tattersfield and Steve Gater (leaders) with 11 Naturetrek clients. Day 1 Sunday 5th May After dropping off the first group, at the airport, we visited the nearby Biguglia Lake and explored a range of coastal and farmland habitats. The sandy beach was backed by Cottonweed Achillea maritima, the handsome knapweed Centaurea sphaerocephala, Sea Chamomile Anthemis maritima and Sea Daffodil Pancratium maritimum and in coastal maquis, there were large stands of the grey-leaved, yellow-flowered Cistus halimifolius. On the lake, we saw the rare Audouin’s Gull and our raptor sightings included Eleonora’s Falcon, Western Marsh Harrier and a pair of Golden Eagle. Other birds, we had not seen during the previous week, included Pallid Swift, Stonechat and a very smart Woodchat Shrike, not far from the airport runway. Unfortunately the weather had been atrocious, with high winds and periods of rain. The airport had been closed for much of the afternoon and the inbound flight, carrying our second group, was delayed by over an hour. Once we had loaded the minibuses, we set off on our journey across the island. The first part was through colourful maquis, with bright-yellow Woad Isatis tinctoria often lining the route.
    [Show full text]
  • ASBS Newsletter Will Recall That the Collaboration and Integration
    Newsletter No. 174 March 2018 Price: $5.00 AUSTRALASIAN SYSTEMATIC BOTANY SOCIETY INCORPORATED Council President Vice President Darren Crayn Daniel Murphy Australian Tropical Herbarium (ATH) Royal Botanic Gardens Victoria James Cook University, Cairns Campus Birdwood Avenue PO Box 6811, Cairns Qld 4870 Melbourne, Vic. 3004 Australia Australia Tel: (+617)/(07) 4232 1859 Tel: (+613)/(03) 9252 2377 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Secretary Treasurer Jennifer Tate Matt Renner Institute of Fundamental Sciences Royal Botanic Garden Sydney Massey University Mrs Macquaries Road Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North 4442 Sydney NSW 2000 New Zealand Australia Tel: (+646)/(6) 356- 099 ext. 84718 Tel: (+61)/(0) 415 343 508 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Councillor Councillor Ryonen Butcher Heidi Meudt Western Australian Herbarium Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa Locked Bag 104 PO Box 467, Cable St Bentley Delivery Centre WA 6983 Wellington 6140, New Zealand Australia Tel: (+644)/(4) 381 7127 Tel: (+618)/(08) 9219 9136 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Other constitutional bodies Hansjörg Eichler Research Committee Affiliate Society David Glenny Papua New Guinea Botanical Society Sarah Mathews Heidi Meudt Joanne Birch Advisory Standing Committees Katharina Schulte Financial Murray Henwood Patrick Brownsey Chair: Dan Murphy, Vice President, ex officio David Cantrill Grant application closing dates Bob Hill Hansjörg Eichler Research Fund: th th Ad hoc
    [Show full text]
  • Host Specificity in the Parasitic Plant Cytinus Hypocistis
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Research Letters in Ecology Volume 2007, Article ID 84234, 4 pages doi:10.1155/2007/84234 Research Letter Host Specificity in the Parasitic Plant Cytinus hypocistis C. J. Thorogood and S. J. Hiscock School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UG, UK Correspondence should be addressed to C. J. Thorogood, [email protected] Received 2 September 2007; Accepted 14 December 2007 Recommended by John J. Wiens Host specificity in the parasitic plant Cytinus hypocistis was quantified at four sites in the Algarve region of Portugal from 2002 to 2007. The parasite was found to be locally host specific, and only two hosts were consistently infected: Halimium halimifolium and Cistus monspeliensis. C. hypocistis did not infect hosts in proportion to their abundance; at three sites, 100% of parasites occurred on H. halimifolium which represented just 42.4%, 3% and 19.7% of potential hosts available, respectively. At the remaining site, where H. halimifolium was absent, 100% of parasites occurred on C. monspeliensis which represented 81.1% of potential hosts available. Other species of potential host were consistently uninfected irrespective of their abundance. Ecological niche divergence of host plants H. halimifolium and C. monspeliensis may isolate host-specific races of C. hypocistis, thereby potentially driving al- lopatric divergence in this parasitic plant. Copyright © 2007 C. J. Thorogood and S. J. Hiscock. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 1. INTRODUCTION host plant (see Figure 1).
    [Show full text]