OSU Law Record College of Law Alumni Association The Ohio State University OSU Law R ecord

Winter 1979-1980

Prepared and edited by Dean Robert A. Carter, Karen Nirschl, Pat Johnson, Barbara Rich and Michaele Prof. (Bob, ’34) and Mrs. Wills join Paul McNamara, ’32, Alex Thompson and Tom Frost. Cavendish, ’53, at lunch honoring the late O’Neill Chief Justice O’Neill. OSU Law Record is published by The Ohio State University College of Law for its Alumni Association, Columbus, Ohio 43210. portrait Send address changes and correspondence regarding editorial content to: Mrs. Pat Johnson, OSU unveiled Law Record, College of Law, The Ohio State University, 1659 North On October 3, 1979, the family, High Street, Columbus, Ohio 43210. friends and admirers of the late Chief Justice C. William O’Neill gathered in OSU College of Law Officers the courtroom of the Ohio Supreme James E. Meeks, Dean Court for a formal ceremony honoring Philip C. Sorensen, Associate Dean the late Chief Justice and to witness John P. Henderson, Associate Dean the unveiling of his portrait. Robert A. Carter, Assistant Dean Mathew F. Dee, Assistant Dean Former Justice Leonard Stern, who was chairman of the committee which OSU College of Law Alumni organized the ceremony, was to make Association the presentation of the portrait to the Court, but was unable to attend as he Norman W. Shibley, President was recuperating from a recent About the cover Frank E. Bazler, President-elect hospitalization. James K. L. Lawrence, Secretary- Treasurer Mrs. Betty O’Neill, wife of the late The presentation was made by Mr. Chief Justice C. William O’Neill, and John Eckler, a partner in the firm of her two children, C. William O’Neill OSU College of Law National Bricker & Eckler. and Mrs. Thomas Pokorski, are shown Council Executive Committee admiring a portrait of the late Chief J. Paul McNamara, Chairman After the ceremony, participants Justice which was unveiled William W. Stanhope, Vice Chairman adjourned to a luncheon in honor of at a formal ceremony before the William L. Coleman Chief Justice O’Neill at the Athletic Justices of the Ohio Supreme Court on Robert M. Duncan Club. During the luncheon, James October 3, 1979. The portrait was David R. Fullmer Meeks, Dean of the OSU College of painted by Cleveland artist, Mrs. John James K. L. Lawrence Law, presented a status report L. Sheridan. Norman W. Shibley regarding contributions to the O’Neill Stuart A. Summit Professorship Fund, and announced Robert A. Carter that Professor Robert Wills had been James E. Meeks appointed to the O’Neill Professorship. Law and the Ways of Knowing

Kenneth L. Karst, professor of law, we like to be known for dexterity, and emotions. In contrast, the left University of California at Los Angeles we don’t want to be called maladroit. hemisphere is not only the main School of Law, and a former member We also value righteousness, and language center but also the center of of the OSU College of Law’s faculty, rectitude, and correct behavior out thinking that is analytic, that breaks up served as the keynote speaker at the there, whatever you may have heard information and processes it, bit by bit, Law Journal Banquet held on May 4, about the involvement of some in sequence. The meaning of 1979. The text of Professor Karst’s Californians in Watergate. language, of course, depends heavily presentation, “Law and the Ways of on the way words are ordered in time. Knowing,” follows: It is one thing to say, “The scales fell on Mrs; Palsgraf,” and quite another Since you already have a fair idea of thing to say, “Mrs. Palsgraf fell on the what I mean by law, I’ll begin on the scales.” In the same way, most day-to- other side of the topic. The last two day work involving mathematics and decades have seen a lot of research science depends on performing on the mechanisms in the human operations in particular sequences. It is brain which relate to different modes the regularity of those time sequences of consciousness, different ways of that permits us to turn complicated knowing. One of the most interesting calculations over to machines. On the findings is that the two halves of the other hand, when we recognize a brain are specialized. The left and right familiar face, we do not proceed analytically, measuring a dimple here, cerebral hemispheres mainly serve and there an eyebrow. We take in the separate modes of consciousness, and each hemisphere is capable of working whole face at once, and our right separately from the other. The next hemispheres recognize it and transfer time someone says to you, “I am of the information to our left two minds about that,” he may be hemispheres, which come up with the speaking the literal truth. name: Larry Herman. Professor Kenneth L. Karst It is easy to oversimplify in talking There is one complication that should about this subject. It is incorrect, for be noted at the outset. The brain’s example, to say that arithmetic is controls over the body are “crossed,” left-hemisphere activity. The logical with the left hemisphere controlling the A preference for the right ordering of numbers and procedures right side of the body and perceiving surely is; but a lot of people see spatial the right visual field, and vice-versa. In Why this linguistic preference for the relationships, and even imagery, when ordinary speech, when we say “left” right? No one really knows, but some they do arithmetic. 1 live with a potter, or “right,” we are talking about those speculations seem reasonable. About and she informs me that numbers sides of the body—and thus to their 95% of the population is have colors. Nor can we say that controls on the opposite sides of the right-handed. (The rest of you are a music is only a right-brained activity. brain. “discrete and insular minority,” but Melodies and pitch are recognized perhaps not yet a suspect there, since they both demand And we do, in ordinary speech, often classification.) For over 100 years it awareness of patterns and use the words “left” and “right”—and has been known that in the typical relationships. But a crucial ingredient not merely to indicate direction . A left- right-handed person, speech functions of music is the sequential ordering of handed compliment isn’t always as well as writing are controlled by the notes in time, and that happens appreciated, nor do we like being left hemisphere of the brain. So, the mainly on the left side of the brain. It called sinister, or even gauche (or its part of the brain which controls the isn’t even true that language resides English variation, gawky). But we do right hand is also responsible for the wholly on the left. One of the basic like to be in the right, and we do insist articulation of ideas, and for choosing ingredients of language is metaphor, on our rights. In a number of western the word that seems “right.” which is a form of analogy from one languages, the words for “right” (in pattern to another—the business of the the sense of direction) and “right” (in right brain. To top it all off, words with the legal sense) and “Law” are all the More recently we have learned that a highly charged emotional content, same, or nearly so. In French, the the awareness of spatial relationships is such as four-letter words, are stored word droit has all three meanings. The centralized on the other side, in the on the right. same word in Italian, mancino, means right hemisphere, along with the both “left” and “deceitful.” Out in abilities to recognize faces, to paint My left hemisphere tells me that it is California, where we celebrate youth, pictures, to dream and to experience time to summarize: On the left side, 1 our ways of knowing are logical, what he says about our field: pattern of conduct, and comparing it analytic, focused; on the right, The law, a most logically structured to some ideal pattern of what is knowledge is intuitive, holistic, diffuse. system, depends predominantly upon reasonable—all of which is activity of The left hemisphere understands precedent and sequence, and upon the right hemisphere. things that are explicit; the right, things language. It is, along with science and formal logic, one of the most refined that are tacit. Thinking on the left is developments of the analytic mode . . . The substantive law provides countless linear, segmented, sequential, examples of this non-analytic, holistic deductive, concerned with causes and When I read this passage for the first thinking. Consider the problem of effects; right brain thinking deals in time, I laughed, and thought: “You defining obscenity, a problem the textures, patterns and analogies, know a lot about your territory, but Supreme Court has not yet solved and relations that are understood all at you haven’t spent much time in ours.” probably never will solve. One once. The left hemisphere is the seat The law, after all, is a human process. experiment with a split-brain patient, of reason; the right hemisphere is the It would be astounding if it could get whose cerebral hemispheres had been home of dreams, and tears, and along without intuition, or emotion, or severed, had her look into a machine laughter. the recognition of familiar that flashed images of geometric patterns—and of course it cannot. Our figures separately to the left and right right hemispheres have enormous visual fields. Without warning, a nude influence on the legal process. Discovering the differences pinup picture was flashed to the left visual area. Her right hemisphere How do we know all this? Partly from recognized the picture, and she the experience of people with brain Fact-finding through a mental filter blushed and giggled. The damage. When certain areas of the left When I spoke of intuition and experimenter asked what she had hemisphere are damaged, the victim emotion, the chances are that many of seen, and she said, “Nothing, just a loses the ability to speak or write, even you thought of the jury trial. Do you flash of light.” When she was pressed though she understands language remember the novel, Anatomy of a to say why she was giggling, all she perfectly well. She may be able to Murder? The defense lawyer’s main said was, “Oh, doctor, you have some communicate by singing what she strategy was to put the victim on trial, machine.” wants to say, or by sending her and to attack the prosecutor. Under message in a stream of four-letter the written law, neither of those tactics Now, for years, Justice Stewart has words. Conversely, a man whose right had any logical relevance to the hemisphere is damaged may have been taking flak for saying that he question theoretically before the jury, couldn’t define obscenity, but he knew trouble dressing himself, or arranging which was whether the defendant was blocks in a simple pattern. it when he saw it. Perhaps he was insane at the time of the killing. But speaking a profound truth. We can’t Further evidence of this division of every trial lawyer knows that the define negligence, either—or nuisance, function in the brain has been found in presentation of a case to a jury is a or probable cause for an arrest—and experiments with victims of a type of blend of logic and theater. Does the yet we expect judges and jurors to epilepsy, for which one treatment is to witness squirm under cross- know these animals when they see cut the nerve fibers connecting the two examination? Is the plaintiffs counsel them. We rely on intuition, on pattern hemispheres. If you blindfold one of fatherly? Does the accident victim recognition, on the kind of thinking these split-brain patients, and place a seem to be in pain? Furthermore, we that sizes up a whole situation familiar object in her right hand, she all know that a juror, or a judge, or an simultaneously and pronounces a can name it. Place an object in her left arbitrator does her fact-finding through judgment—the sort of judgment that hand, however, and she cannot a mental filter composed of her own can’t be explained in words. If you describe it in words. But she does values and purposes. Half a century think I am exaggerating, I challenge know what it is. For example, she can ago, the legal realists were pointing you to read, at random, any ten pick out another object with the same out that even the most explicit legal opinions in which courts are struggling shape from a tray containing several rules are often little more than to explain why police officers did or different objects. Her right hemisphere reference points in a process did not have probable cause to make recognizes the object’s pattern, but dominated by the immediate raw their arrests. And just imagine what it since her left hemisphere is cut off materials of the setting of a particular would be like if we asked the jury to from that information, she has no case, with about as much influence explain how it came to the conclusion words to describe it. There is a way in over what happens in a trial as that a driver was negligent. which all of us have experienced this compass points might have on a phenomenon of the divided brain: navigator who is picking his way past “The heart has its reasons, which rocks and shoals. Balancing costs and benefits reason cannot tell.” But the truth is that the legal rules Even where the legal rules do seem to Robert Omstein is a psychologist and very often are not explicit. How many be explicit, the application of those a leader in this field of brain research. areas of law could we name, without rules to particular cases often shifts our He also writes popular books on the even drawing a breath, in which the way of thinking from the left to the subject, to help someone like me controlling question usually turns out right hemisphere. The First grasp the main ideas without to be whether someone has behaved, Amendment says, “Congress shall overloading either cerebral “reasonably”? That question, as we all make no law . . . abridging the hemisphere. In his latest book, he has learn in law school, is answered not so freedom of speech.” On its face, that a chapter contrasting the logical and much by analyzing bits and pieces of looks like a pretty explicit prohibition. intuitive ways of knowing. Here is information as by evaluating a whole But does the First Amendment really 2 mean that Congress can’t make it a a close case, the process of decision is property professor’s silly statement crime for a witness in a federal court not analytical but intuitive. Justice shows, that very facility limits us. We to commit perjury? Well, you may Holmes put it more elegantly: “The are immersed, all the time, in the say, the “freedom of speech” doesn’t life of the law has not been logic, it process of forcing people and include the right to tell lies under oath. has been experience.” transactions and events into our And then the whole game of literal doctrinal pigeonholes. The analogy interpretation and deductive reasoning And yet . . . doesn’t Professor perceived metaphorically in a lawyer’s is lost—as every Justice except Hugo Ornstein have a point? Once our right hemisphere soon crystallizes into Black has understood (and even he intuitive judgments are made, do we a formal rule, to be elaborated had his moments). Once we start not force them into our categories, deductively. applying large concepts like the explaining them as if the process of freedom of speech, or the equal decision had been analytical and Let me draw another illustration from protection of the laws, we are deductive? Judge Cardozo was my field of constitutional law. In 1965, inevitably caught up on a mental reputed to agonize before deciding, Harry Kalven wrote a fine article about process of balancing costs and but his opinions resounded with a case involving a sidewalk benefits— which is the same holistic, inevitability. John Marshall very likely demonstration. His title used the right-brain process of thinking that did not agonize in the same way, and phrase, “the public forum,” and in the decides questions of negligence or yet every law student learns how he article he expounded the right of probable cause. managed to write opinions that were people to gather in streets and parks models of deductive logic, by the to express their grievances or simple technique of begging all the otherwise convey their messages. The In fact, as Edward Levi explained important questions. Nor is this years ago, the law’s basic style of term “public forum” began as a rather technique limited to judges. Lawyers diffuse metaphor. A sidewalk, after all, reasoning is the analogy. This style is may know, as Holmes said, that built into any system for resolving a is intended mainly for the movement “General propositions do not decide of people. Yet the metaphor itself had dispute by submitting it to a third concrete cases,” but as advocates party: a judge, an arbitrator, a village generative power, because it lawyers behave as if the opposite were embodied an important ideal. In the headman, a parent. When I go to the true. To read a lawyer’s brief is to be headman or the judge, I know it won’t years since 1965, lawyers and courts led through an exercise in logical have converted this diffuse metaphor be persuasive if I say, simply: “I want deduction. A lawyer knows that her into a series of rather specific rules. A Orin to pay me $100.” I have to give job as an advocate is to rationalize, to a reason, and that means appealing to municipal airport’s passenger terminal start from some authoritative text is part of the public forum—and so Dr. some principle of justice beyond my (such as a contract or a constitution) own preference. As soon as 1 appeal Moon’s bright young zombies can and build a bridge to the result she accost you with their flowers and to a principle, I have made an wants: “Judge, you tell me what the outstretched palms. A jailhouse lawn, argument by analogy. The point is rule is, and I’ll explain why it easy to see when I cite some previous though, is not part of the public necessarily follows that my client forum—and so some other young decision: The very use of precedent wins.” mentioned by Professor Ornstein is, in people cannot hold a demonstration there. We saw earlier how some rules part, right-brain thinking. But even if I that seem explicit tend to break down, rely on a statute, I am drawing an and give way to holistic, right- analogy to the facts of some Distinguishing facts from values hemisphere interest-balancing. Now hypothetical case that everyone agrees Legal education reinforces our we see the opposite happening: some was intended to be covered by the professional inclination to convert general, diffuse, metaphoric law. And in a borderline case, when intuition into analysis and deduction. the judge chooses between competing statements of principle tend to In the classroom, we prize the ability crystallize into particularized rules that analogies, the weight he assigns to to distinguish between facts and each side can’t help being affected by can be applied more or less values, even though that separation deductively, especially by lower court his whole pattern of values. All this itself is artificial. Because we are has been familiar learning for two judges who are less concerned to be uncomfortable with discussions of creative than they are to avoid being generations. values, we deal with them in teaching overruled. True enough, someone’s mainly by assuming them. Sometimes right hemisphere is very much The role of analogy in legal thought is the value assumptions are stated, but involved in deciding whether the jail illustrated by the insistent use of usually they are left inarticulate, and grounds are sufficiently analogous to metaphor in lawyers’ arguments and therefore unchallenged. We have even the sidewalk. But once the Supreme judges’ opinions. A statute is said to worked up an ideology to justify this Court has decided that question, the have a “chilling effect” on the freedom preference for the left hemisphere. next jail grounds case is apt to be a of speech. When the police turn up When I was in law school, there was a foregone conclusion. evidence as a result of their earlier property professor who used to say, misconduct, we call the evidence “the “If you can’t express an idea clearly, fruit of the poisonous tree.” All the then you don’t have a clear idea.” It is The past also controls the present for lawyers here will have their own no wonder that law teachers and law lawyers in another way. If you are examples of the way we use metaphor students prefer to do the things w e. working in a law office, and you want to embody legal doctrine by suggesting can do well. Lawyers, as a group, are to write a will, or form a corporation, basic patterns or analogies. The reason superbly well-equipped to deal with almost certainly you will go to the files these metaphors have power is that in left-hemisphere problems, but as the to find a model for the papers you 3 need. If your firm is large, there may mechanism, aimed at discarding part the left-brained discipline of her craft. even be a set of tapes that can be of our experience, and limiting our The people who come to Law Journal inserted in an automatic typewriter, to thoughts and our actions. banquets have mastered that produce a standardized document. discipline. They deserve our Perhaps it is less obvious that thinking How is it possible to mechanize parts congratulations. But perhaps they also in analogies also has the effect of of a practice that is supposed to be need to be cautioned. Mostly, law limiting our perspectives, but it does, professional? The answer is that some school rewards the work of the brain’s as the history of the “public forum” document forms are tried and true. left hemisphere. The world, however, doctrine shows. To draw an analogy is Why play around with new language has a more complicated system of to pick out some features from the when we know that an old formula rewards. A few years ago the UCLA totality of the situation before us, and not only will serve our needs, but has law class of 1965 held its ten-year to discard the rest—thus defining for the blessing of the courts? For a lot of reunion in a house that was splashy, the future what is relevant. The right the law’s purposes, the past is not only even by Los Angeles standards. After hemisphere, too, has its ways of the prologue, but the script. Perhaps a few drinks, the host put his arm diminishing our experience. Professor Ornstein is entitled to do around one of my colleagues, waved some laughing of his own. He is right grandly with his other hand, and said, when he says that the law is a refined The brain, in other words, acts as a “Professor, you see what a 58 in Torts version of the analytic mode of screening mechanism in both will buy?” thinking. His statement isn’t wrong; it hemispheres, limiting both reason and is just not quite complete. imagination. But before we begin to Lawyers who lack analytical ability, of feel a sense of loss, let’s remember course, are useless. But lawyers who that this screening is essential to our are too devoted to deductive, survival. If we couldn’t select from The paradox of legal creativity analytical thinking are a menace, among the millions of bits of because they insist on confining us in information that are coming at us yesterday’s definitions of what is There is a paradox lurking here. every second—if we couldn’t focus our relevant. They are the ones who (Notice that paradoxes live in the left attention—we’d be paralyzed, helpless. provoked the remark that law is the hemisphere; in a dream, nothing is government of the living by the dead. incongruous.) It is the paradox of legal This ability to select and focus finds its highest expression in language. We And here, I think, is the main value of creativity, which some people may clinical legal education—not the think is a logical contradiction, as some lawyers are justly proud of our ability to capture experience in words. But training in legal skills (although that is people have said of the phrase a useful by-product), but the exposure “military intelligence.” Lawyers are let’s pause to consider the metaphor of capture. When we use words to of the student to a legal world where specialists in sorting out the relevant he can see the importance of intuition from the irrelevant, and they are express ourselves, we build a series of little prisons to confine our thoughts. and imagination and all those ways of specialists in drawing analogies. Both knowing that our left-hemisphere functions can be liberating, but both of We are the captives, not the universe we pretend to reduce to words. Yet, classrooms largely ignore. The best them also serve to confine our part of clinical education is what it thought. The idea of relevance ironically, it is this very discipline of our raw sensations that has made all does to improve academic education obviously is a limiting idea. I when the student comes back to the remember one sad day ten years ago, our law, all our institutions, all our civilization possible. The most right- classroom ready to make creative when I was sitting in a room at UCLA, connections between reason and feeling the tension around me. The brained painter standing before his easel stands at the end of a chain of intuition. It is that creativity that is the Regents had just fired Angela Davis highest calling in our profession. for being a member of the Communist language thousands of years long. Party. A colleague leaned over and Words confine, but they also create, said to me, “The main thing a lawyer as the “public forum” metaphor A few of you will remember the day in can do here is to try to get people to helped create part of today’s 1960, when we dedicated the College talk about things that are relevant.” He Constitution. of Law’s new building. For the was right, of course. But what is occasion, an artist was commissioned relevant—that is, what our left- Translating intuition into reason to do a water color of the building. A hemisphere, analytical thinking tells print of that picture has been hanging us—is determined by the assumptions Creativity in the law, as elsewhere, in my office at UCLA since the we are making about rules or goals. involves both intuition and reason. mid-1960’s. I keep it there as an What the Regents had done was Those epilepsy patients who had their impressionistic, right-hemisphere plainly unconstitutional, but to respond brain hemispheres surgically separated symbol of my affection for the people with a lawsuit (which we did) was were able to go about their daily tasks we knew during our seven years in relevant only on one level. Looking at almost entirely unimpaired. What they Columbus, and especially the people the whole picture, using the lost was the ability to think creatively. on this faculty who taught me so consciousness of our right When a lawyer in her office hits upon much. Somehow just saying that I am hemispheres, we knew that what the a new analogy that may promote her delighted to be back on this campus, Regents had done was not only client’s interests, it is not enough for and that I am honored by your unlawful but wrong, and that it was her to have the flash of intuition. She invitation, is hopelessly inadequate to important to the university for the must translate that insight into a express my feelings. But it will have to faculty to stand up and say so. The reasoned argument or a new do, because there are limits on what notion of relevance is a sorting institution—and that involves using all can be conveyed in words.

V 4 George V. Voinovich, Class of.’61, Cuyahoga County’s three defeated incumbent Dennis Kucinich commissioners ended a 44-year reign Alumnus by some 20,000 votes in the by the Democratic Party in county Cleveland mayoral election on government. November 6, 1979, with a margin of 56-44 percent. He did well in all parts Because of a constitutional of the city, including 55% of the black amendment, and a new state statute, Voinovich vote despite the last-minute visit of he was the first Lieutenant Governor former Mayor Carl Stokes on candidate in Ohio’s 175-year history to Kucinich’s behalf. Voinovich ran as a run in tandem with the Governor. In Republican in the overwhelmingly the past, the Governor and Lt. elected Democratic city, but the election was Governor were elected separately. The technically non-partisan. Voinovich Rhodes-Voinovich team were the only received major support from the city’s statewide Republicans to win in Ohio business and banking leaders. With 26 in 1978. Voinovich was credited with of the 500 largest U.S. industrial being extremely instrumental in the Cleveland victory, keeping the margin of defeat corporations headquartered in Cleveland—more than any other city in the democratic stronghold of except Chicago or New Cuyahoga County to less than 56,000 York—business leaders have votes. Other statewide democrats won Mayor traditionally played a powerful role in the county with margins of over local politics. 100,000 votes. The Rhodes-Voinovich ticket won statewide by 48,000 votes. Voinovich is 43 years old. He graduated from Cleveland Collinwood Over the years, Voinovich has High School and Ohio University, received many honors. He was named where he majored in government and one of the 10 outstanding young men served as president of the Ohio in Greater Cleveland by the Cleveland University Student Council. He is a Jaycees for four consecutive years 1961 graduate of the OSU College of and, in 1970, was named one of the Law. five outstanding young men in Ohio by the Ohio Jaycees. His Alma Mater, Voinovich was named as assistant Ohio University, gave him its attorney general for the State of Ohio certificate of merit award for bringing by William Saxbe. Then, in 1966, he distinction to Ohio University for his made his first bid for public office. He work in public administration. The defeated a three-term incumbent, was National Association of County elected to the Ohio House of Officials (NACO) bestowed on him its Representatives and was re-elected in achievement award for his outstanding 1968 and 1970 by over 2 to 1 work in the area of real property margins. appraisal. While in the Ohio House, Voinovich He is a lecturer at the Lincoln Institute sponsored over 85 bills that have in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and become law. He served on the recently served as a project adviser for powerful House Finance and the International Association of Appropriations Committee for three Assessing Officers (IAAO) reference manual on “Improving Real Property Mayor George V. Voinovich terms, the State Government Committee for two terms and was Assessment”. vice-chairman of the Environmental and Natural Resources Committee for Voinovich is currently a member of one year. the Cleveland, Cuyahoga County and Ohio Bar Associations; The In 1971, he was appointed Cuyahoga International Association of Assessing County Auditor, a post he held for Officers; The Municipal Finance five years. While auditor he was Officers Association; The American chairman of the legislative task force of Society for Public Administration; The the County Auditors Association, National Association of Counties and chairman of the group’s legislative The Ohio County Commissioners committee, and member of the Association. executive committee. Voinovich is married to the former Answering his party’s call in 1976, Janet Allen and has three children. Voinovich took on the co-chairman of His fourth child, 9-year-old Molly, was the Democratic Party in a hotly killed in a car accident on Columbus contested race for Cuyahoga County Day, 1979, which tinged his mayoral Commissioner. His election as one of victory with sadness. 5 College news

Paul McNamara, ’32, chairman of the National Council, greets Paul (’39) and Anita Ward at the annual alumni dinner. Class of ’82 enrolls 238 Alum receives The College enrolled 238 In the class commencing Autumn Quarter of Service Award 1979. The class is comprised of graduates from 89 different institutions. Ohio State, once again, J. Paul McNamara, a member of the tops the list with 60 representatives in Class of 1932, was presented the the first year class, followed by Miami University’s Distinguished Service University (Ohio) with 19, Ohio Award at the 1979 Summer University with 9 and Bowling Green Commencement ceremony. The text State University with 8. Of the first of his award reads as follows: year class, 78% (185) are Ohio “Prominent Ohio attorney, alumnus of residents, 38% (91) are female, a this University, J. Paul McNamara record number for the College, and represents the finest in dedication for 8% (19) are members of a minority his highly esteemed gifts of time and group. effort in behalf of legal education. Especially noteworthy was his service The students bring excellent academic as chairman of the College of Law’s records to the College. The average major gifts committee, the group that undergraduate GFA of the class is raised nearly $1 million dollars in 3.57 on a 4.0 scale, and the average support of the College’s programs. His LSAT score is 628. A total of 991 recent appointment as Chairman of students applied for admission to the the National Council of the College of College, down approximately 27% Law affirms his concern for the from the previous year. However, improvement of legal education, not applications to law schools across the only at this University, but across the State of Ohio were down about 15% nation. The high regard in which he is for the same period. Of the 991 held by his academic colleagues students who had applied to the further reveals the full measure of his College, 463 were admitted to obtain contributions.” the desired enrollment of 238.

6 O’Neill fund drive Law School hosts National Council nears goal Judge McGowan meets The National Council of the College of Last winter the O’Neill Family and During the week of October 1, the Law gathered at the Faculty Club on friends of Chief Justice O’Neill decided Law School was delighted to have a October 5 for its Annual Fall Meeting. to join the College of Law in raising visit from Judge Carl McGowan of the After lunch, Professor Roy F. Proffitt, the money to endow a Professorship U.S. Court of Appeals for the District a member of the faculty of the in memory of the Chief Justice. This of Columbia. During his visit, Judge University of Michigan Law School, was thought to be a particularly McGowan made brief presentations to and Samuel Krugliak, a partner in the appropriate memorial to his memory the classes and faculty members, led firm of Krugliak, Wilkins, Griffiths & due to his strong interest in the informal discussions with students on a Dougherty, of Canton, Ohio, led a education of young lawyers and his wide range of legal topics and led a panel discussion on fund-raising love for Ohio State. faculty seminar in which he discussed strategies, as both have been active in the subject of “Current Proposals Michigan’s fund-raising efforts over the Our goal was $250,000 and we now (Legislative, Judicial and Executive) to years. have in hand cash and pledges of Control Administrative Agency $210,000. Our interim goal was Actions.” Judge McGowan’s visit After this very informative $175,000 by September 1. We met culminated with his participation on a presentation, the Council members the deadline and at its September panel which presented a discussion of adjourned to the Law School where meeting the OSU Board of Trustees “The Role of Law Schools in Teaching they conducted a wide ranging created the C. William O’Neill Lawyering Skills” to the members of discussion on matters of student, Professorship of Law and Judicial the National Council of the College of faculty and alumni interest. Administration. Professor Robert Wills Law. The meeting concluded with a panel was installed in the Professorship at discussion on “The Role of the Law the October Board meeting, as We would like to express our sincerest Schools in Teaching Lawyering Skills”. reported elsewhere in the Law appreciation to the members of the Panelists for the discussion were The Record. faculty, students, and especially Honorable Carl McGowan, Judge, alumni, for their interest and United States Court of Appeals for the We are hopeful that we will complete participation during Judge McGowan’s D.C. Circuit; The Honorable William the full funding of the Professorship visit. It was indeed a most informative Thomas, Judge, U.S. District Court shortly. A big thank you to all alumni and enriching week for the Law for the Northern District of Ohio; and and friends of the College who have School community. Mr. John Elam, President-Elect of the helped. American College of Trial Lawyers and a member of the firm of Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease.

Judge Duncan welcomes class of ’82. Judge McGowan Mr. Elam and Judge Thomas Clinic handles appeal to U.S. Supreme Court The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review the dismissal of an appeal by an Ohio woman from a juvenile court order permanently removing her two children from her custody. The woman could not afford to pay for a transcript of the juvenile hearing and a request for a free transcript was denied. Since the transcript was necessary to file an appeal, her appeal was also denied. The appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court is being handled by Louis Jacobs, an Assistant Professor at the College of Law, and Chris Blair, a Supervising Attorney for the Law School’s Civil Law Clinic. They contend that the plaintiff s constitutional rights of due process and equal protection were violated when she was denied a free transcript. Students at the College of Law prepared the woman’s request for her Supreme Court review. “Although a state need not provide an appeal at all,” they told the court, “this Court has made it clear that if a state does provide for appellate review, it cannot do so in a way that discriminates against some because of their poverty.” The cases cited in the petition involve criminal trial; the court is now being asked to extend that analysis to the civil area. (In the Matter of Otis, No. 795215.) Professor Michael J. Perry Perry was nominated for the award on the basis of his research into the Three appointed to Perry named legitimacy of constitutional judicial clerkships distinguished interpretation by the Supreme Court. Since his graduation from Columbia The College of Law is delighted to researcher University School of Law in 1973, announce that three alumni and graduates of the class of 1979 were Michael J. Perry, Ohio State Perry has briskly pursued a brilliant appointed to judicial clerkships. University Professor of Law, was one legal career in which he has clerked Matthew Yackshaw was appointed to of six professors selected to receive the for two outstanding judges, served as a clerkship for a trial judge, Kenneth first annual Ohio State University assistant and associate professor on Harkins, U.S. Court of Claims, Distinguished Research Award the faculty of the Ohio State University Washington, D.C., Gary Spring was presented this past spring. College of Law, published seven major articles in important law review appointed to a clerkship for Justice The awards recognize outstanding journals and spent a year as a visiting Paul Brown, Ohio Supreme Court, scholarly research accomplishmehts by professor at Yale Law School. He has Columbus, Ohio, and Daniel Conkle members of the faculty in two been described by his colleagues as was appointed to a clerkship with categories: senior professors who have one of the leading young Judge Edward Tamm, U.S. Court of established a long record of Constitutional Law scholars in this Appeals, D.C. Circuit, in Washington, continuing research, and younger country. D.C. faculty for the quality of initial work and demonstration of promised This year, he returned to the Ohio The Law School wishes to extend potential. Each award winner received State University’s College of Law congratulations to its three former a $1,000 honorarium and a research faculty as a full professor, and will students for being selected to serve in grant totaling $9,000 to support commence writing his first book on the their respective clerkships. continued research. Supreme Court of the last 25 years. 8 Presently, WLC is raising funds to As a teacher, as a writer, as a library Wills and Herman send members to the National administrator, and as an organizer for appointed to new Conference on Women in the Law, his profession, Professor Pollack which will be held in February, 1980. taught courses in jurisprudence, legal professorships In addition to the educational process, and legal research and experience, WLC members hope to writing, and for nearly two decades The College of Law is pleased to gain experience and knowledge which now, virtually every law student in the announce the appointment of may assist them in their bid to host the country has won entrance to legal Professor Robert Wills and Professor National Conference in the future. literature through Pollack’s Lawrence Herman to two newly Fundamentals of Legal Research, now created professorships. Professor Wills, in its fourth edition. His monographs a member of the faculty for 33 years, and articles, which span thirty years, was appointed to fill the C. William On-campus career include scholarly work on not only law O’Neil Professorship in Law and recruiting up 29% librarianship but also trade practices Judicial Administration, and Professor and the philosophy of jurisprudence. Herman, a member of the faculty for During the current placement season, 18 years, was appointed to fill the 108 recruiters visited the Law School Presidents Club Professorship. to conduct interviews, an increase of 29% over last year. As of November Baker speaks at We wish to take this opportunity to 1, approximately 3,754 interviews had express our sincere thanks to all of the been conducted. Of the 108 recruiters Law Forum many friends, alumni and Presidents conducting on-campus interviews, 37 Club members whose generous (34%) were from Columbus, 25 Mr. Donald I. Baker, former Assistant contributions made possible the (23%) were from Cleveland, 8 (7%) Attorney General for the Antitrust creation of these two professorships. were from Cincinnati and 3 (3%) were Division of the U.S. Department of Moreover, we are extremely grateful from Toledo; 20 recruiters (19%) Justice, delivered a series of lectures through these professorships to have were from out of state, with the as part of the College’s Law Forum the opportunity to recognize two of remaining 15 (14%) composed of Speaker Program. The title of Mr. the faculty’s most distinguished employers from other cities throughout Baker’s presentation was “The teachers and scholars, Professors Wills Ohio. Awkward Balance: Antitrust and and Herman, for their long-standing Politics.” contribution to the College and its In early Spring, the Placement Office students. plans to make available statistics The first of Mr. Baker’s three lectures regarding the number of offers was entitled “Legislative and extended and the number of offers Institutional History: The Evaluation of accepted which have resulted from on- Antitrust as an Important and Women’s Law campus interviews this fall. Ambiguous force in the United States”; the second presentation was Caucus plans year Most recently, the Placement Office entitled “The Problem of Goals: has published a Placement Bulletin Populism Versus Efficiency”; and his The Women’s Law Caucus (WLC), which includes information regarding third and final presentation was formerly the Law Association for the Law School’s history, its entitled “Process?: How Political Women, is broadening its approach to educational program, its learning Should Antitrust Enforcement Be?”. helping women in law school. In resources and facilities, and pictures addition to the traditional orientation and short biographical resumes of Mr. Baker, who is presently associated presented for new students each fall, students in the classes of 1980 and with the Washington office of the Cleveland-based law firm of Jones, WLC has sponsored a stress 1981. We suggest that alumni who are management seminar, and lunches interested in receiving a copy of this Day, Reavis & Pogue, is a graduate of where presentations were made on publication contact the Placement Harvard Law School. In addition to his tenure with the U.S. Department preparing for exams and job Office at 422-2631. interviewing. WLC has also provided a of Justice, he has also served as a support group in conjunction with the member of the faculty of Cornell Law School where he taught courses in the University Counseling and areas of antitrust and financial Consultation Service. Pollack’s law text regulation. He is the author of November 9-11, 14 members of WLC published numerous articles and publications on attended the Midwest Conference of the subjects of antitrust, banking and Women and the Law in Ann Arbor, posthumously trade regulation, and is considered by Michigan. Their response was many to be one of the leading enthusiastic and, as a result, the WLC Ervin H. Pollack, head of the Ohio authorities in these areas. is planning an Ohio conference on State University Law Library for 25 Women and the Law, focusing on years, was near publication of a new The College was delighted with the response to Mr. Baker’s presentation Ohio’s laws affecting women and text on jurisprudence at the time of his addressing problems faced by women death in 1972. That text, and plans to continue to attract persons of Mr. Baker’s caliber to practitioners in the State, as well as Jurisprudence: Principles and general topics such as managing a Applications, has just been published participate in the Law Forum Speaker’s Program. career and family life. by The Ohio State University Press. 9 program offers an excellent OSU law grads fare informational resource for students, Kindred wins grant well on Ohio bar many of whom have questions Professor Michael Kindred was regarding course selection, career recently notified that he would be exam objectives and future employment awarded a research grant by The possibilities as well as many other Dana Fund for International and Last July, 166 OSU law graduates practical questions about the practice Comparative Legal Studies. He will were subjected to three days of bar of law. combine the grant with a Professional exams—two days of essays on Ohio While many alumni have already Development Leave from the law with one day of multi-state responded to the Columbus Bar University. He plans to study the legal standardized testing sandwiched in Associations’s request for participants status and treatment of the mentally between. OSU students distinguished in the program, we urge all alumni impaired under the legal systems of themselves by producing the greatest who have not as yet expressed interest several countries. He plans to spend number of students who passed the to contact the Placement Office at part of the year in Europe to do the bar (160 students; tied with Cleveland 422-2631 so that we may arrange for research. State) and placing second in % of your participation. students passing/total number of students testing with 96.4% behind Fund memorializes the University of Cincinnati’s 97.9%). Glander Fund The complete breakdown of July, established Terrence Morse 1979, bar results for Ohio law schools Terry Morse, ’73, was tragically killed is as follows: Chuck Glander ’59, his wife Sue, and in an air accident returning to No. of Percent the rest of the Glander family recently Columbus from a baseball game in Students Passing made a gift to the College of $5,000 Cincinnati. He was a member of the Univ. Cinn. 97 97.9 in memory of Mr. and Mrs. C. Emory Presidents Club and the proceeds of a 96.4 Ohio State 166 Glander. Alumni will remember Mr. life insurance policy were to be used 112 93.8 Univ. Akron Glander, who taught as an adjunct Case Western 137 93.4 for the benefit of the College of Law. Univ. Dayton 76 88.2 member of the faculty in the Law The fund is approximately $30,000 Capital 124 87.9 School for many years. The income and will be used to endow a fund in Univ. Toledo 136 84.6 from the Glander Fund will be used to memory of Mr. Morse. The income Ohio Northern 73 83.6 enhance the library collection in the will be used to help support the Moot Cleve. State 198 80.8 tax field, a very appropriate way of Court program and to create an award (Article reprinted form “Hearsay, ” the OSU memorializing Mr. Glander’s interest in for the best seminar paper each year. Law Student newsletter.) the practice and teaching of the law of taxation. Professor Rosenn Preceptor Program Bequest creates accepts Miami begins June Purcell and appointment Arthur Guild Fund Professor Keith Rosenn, a member of Commencing Winter Quarter, the Law the faculty since 1965, resigned School will begin its preceptor The College of Law recently received recently to become Associate Director program in which first year law a bequest of $29,479 from the estate of the Law and Economics Center, students are afforded the opportunity of June Purcell and Arthur Guild. Ms. University of Miami Law School, in to gain exposure to the realities of the Purcell received her L.L.B. degree Coral Gables, Florida. practice of law through direct contact from the College of Law in 1910 and with practicing attorneys. Students will had died in 1967. The gift will Professor Rosenn was a cum laude be matched with practitioners whose establish an endowed fund in memory graduate from Amherst College in responsibility will be to acquaint the of Ms. Purcell and her husband, Mr. 1960, and received his L.L.B. from student with the operation of his or Guild. The income from the fund is to Yale Law School in 1963, where he her law office and, in addition, be used for student financial aid, with was a member of the Order of the provide that student with the a preference to be accorded to needy Coif. Subsequent to law school, he opportunity to observe the practitioner black students. served as law clerk to Judge J. Joseph in an actual work situation such as a Smith, U.S. Court of Appeals for the house closing, a deposition, or some Second Circuit, and later became other form of client representation. College receives associated with the firm of Rosenn, Jenkins & Greenwald, in Wilkes- The Preceptor Program, which was Bucher bequest Barre, Pennsylvania. developed through a cooperative arrangement between the Columbus The College of Law will be receiving a Durring his tenure with the College of Bar Association and the Law School, major gift from the estate of Walter J. Law, Professor Rosenn taught is viewed as an extremely beneficial Bucher of Dayton, Ohio. He left Comparative Law, Constitutional Law, experience for both the beginning law approximately $90,000 to the College Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, student and members of the Bar. In in memory of his wife, Ernestine Law and Inflation, and International addition, the College believes such a Wampler Bucher, Class of 1930. Business Planning. 10 Law Library for research only? Disregarding the large signs at the entrances of the room, “Library for Research Only”, 210 alumni on October 5, renewed old acquaintances in the setting where many of them had toiled together for so many hours during their law school years. The festive atmosphere among the books and journals led one alum to remark that henceforth the room should be called the “Library and Alumni Banquet Room.” The event was the law alumni annual reunion, which was held for the first time in the College of Law Building. An informal reception was held on the first floor of the building, followed by a delicious dinner in the gracious atmosphere of the Law Library. Many familiar faces were present. Margaret Reyneau, ’16, attended, Part of the head table (from right) Mrs. president of Alumni Association, Mr. Stuart remarking that she certainly enjoyed Frank Bazler, Mr. Frank Bazler, ’53, new Summit, ’59, outgoing president of Alumni president-elect of Alumni Association, Mrs. Association, Dean Meeks, Mr. Tom the evening and hoped to return next Norm Shibley, Mr. Norm Shibley, ’49, new Cavendish, ’53 (standing). year, when the reunion will again be held at the College of Law Building. Stuart A. Summit, ’59, outgoing President of the Law Alumni Association, gave greetings to all, then introduced the new President, Norman Shibley, ’49, and his wife, Jeanne; Frank E. Bazler, ’53, President-elect and his wife, Ginnie; and James K. L. Lawrence, ’65, Secretary-Treasurer. Dean James Meeks then introduced members of the faculty who were present. Stu Summit extended a welcome to the Class of 1929, Class of 1939, Classes of 1944-1947, and the Class of 1954. Dean Frank Strong presented a certificate of congratulations from the College to the Class of 1929, which was celebrating its 50-year reunion. The presentation by Mr. Summit to J . Gilbert Reese, ’52, of the 1979 Distinguished Alumnus Award was a memorable experience for all.

Middle: Stu Summit, ’59, and Dean Meeks congratulate Gib Reese, ’52, on receiving the Distinguished Alumni Award.

Bottom Left: Justice Paul Brown, ’39, with Bob (’52) and Anne Balyeat.

Bottom Right: Dorothy Binyon Sullivan, ’35, and Grace Heck Faust, ’30, enjoy dinner in the Law Library. 29 attend 40-year reunion The Class of 1939 held a reunion on October 5, 1979, at the Holiday Inn on Lane Avenue. Forty years is a long time and that is exactly how long it has been since this class left Page Hall. Twenty-nine members of the class were present for the dinner. Dean Frank Strong was a guest and the class enjoyed visiting with him. Dean James Meeks and his wife, Priscilla,were also guests for the evening. It was a great evening and the stories told were incredible! Each left feeling that forty years really wasn’t such a long time after all. 25-year class Gene Mahoney, Leon Loechler and Ace Young, Class of’39. reunites A 25-year reunion was held by the Class of 1954 on September 8, 1979,at the Holiday Inn on Lane Avenue. The class began its festivities by attending the OSU-Syracuse game and then attended a buffet dinner. Two members of the class traveled from California to attend. After the dinner members brought each other up to date regarding their activities, families, etc. for the past twenty-five years. A great time was had by all. Prof. Robert Wills and his wife, Ruth,and Dean James Meeks and his wife, Priscilla, were guests at the reunion. The members attending were all pleased that they had attended and it was decided they would not wait for so many years to pass again before having another reunion. Rose Anna Coleman, Marcella Mahoney and Priscilla Meeks enjoy Class of ’39 reunion. Ten-year reunion meets A tenth-year reunion was held by the 1969 Ohio State University College of Law alumni on Saturday, May 26, 1979, at the Scioto Country Club. On the evening before, Walter Reckless hosted an open house at his home in Dublin where many 1969 returnees “warmed up” for the Saturday festivities. Approximately 60 graduates, plus their spouses or friends, attended the buffet dinner and dance. A number of the 1969 classmates traveled great distances to attend. A class directory with current information relative to types of (Clockwise from right) Leon and Eula Loechler, Helen and Paul Brown, Anita and practice, activities, addresses and Paul Ward, and Mary and H. Alfred Glascor at 40-year reunion. phone numbers was distributed at the reunion. who would not let the O.S.U. quarterback pass. Michigan quickly trespassed into Ohio territory. But, when they threw the ball, O.S.U.’s middle guardian ad litem, Rhonda Rivera, intercepted and ran for a T.D. The score was illusory, however, due to an illegal motion. The points were rescinded by the judicial referee, who, on the theory of restitution, gave the ball back to Michigan.

In the 2nd half Ohio State battered its way back, the proximate cause being several punitive penalties against Michigan’s coach for illegal motions to strike. Ohio kept the ball in Michigan territory for a preponderance of the 2nd half, leaving it beyond a reasonable doubt that O.S.U. would direct the game’s verdict. Michigan could not put up a scintilla of a defense as O.S.U.’s star “fee tail’ back Greg “Traveling” Travalio adversely possessed the ball for most of the last quarter. O.S.U. finally won, with the help of the brilliant play of safeties Reichman and Rose who stalled the Michigan offense in double overtime!!

One sad note was the injury to end Frank Upham, who slipped on the astro turf, striking his head on the card catalogue in the endzone. This aggravated a 1950 injury he had received from “O”, which caused him to go partially insane once more. Upham was last seen running out of OSU v. Michigan, the stadium in “mere pursuit” of a fox, whom he chased into Pierson’s Post Tavern.

18 NE2d 15 (1979) The highlight of the game was the halftime show when the O.S.U. Law School Marching Band performed Script “Internal Revenue Code §1341 The following is an article which (known prior to the game as the Law (a) (1) (ii)” with accompanying appeared in the November 12 issue of School Alumni Dinner Banquet regulations. Block O. Jur. dazzled the Hearsay, a weekly newsletter prepared Room). Michigan was leading (its “voluminous” crowd, which packed entirely by law students: (Students witnesses) through much of the 1st the balcony, as well as the mezzanine, who collaborated on this particular half, but O.S.U. appealed in the 2nd with picture perfect Blue Book article are Tim Jones, Jim Ellis, Chuck half to reverse the score and win a Citations and original cheers like DEE- Jones, Dave Jump and John Joseph.) final judgment. fense!! (A.P Columbus) Next weekend will be Michigan was grossly negligent on the the annual rivalry between Ohio State opening play allowing O.S.U.’s kick and Michigan. Last weekend an and tax return specialist “Slammin’ After the game, Coach Meeks of equally strong rivalry was played in Sam” Samansky to advance the ball O.S.U. was unavailable for comment Columbus between the law school for a credit of 63 yards. However, a because he was still correcting some of football teams of these two schools. deduction of 10 yards was assessed the plays from last year’s Michigan The controversy pitted the “Nolo when a 3rd party claimed uncivil game. With this win O.S.U. will move Contendres” of Michigan v. Roman procedure. O.S.U. was stopped on past Michigan in the BAR rankings Polanski’s Wellhung Nudum Statutory the next set of downs by the and gain a berth to the “Sowle Bowl” Tortfeasing Squids” of O.S.U. The intimidating defensive play of former in January. Go Squids!! game was held at Dee Stadium O.S.U. star, Howie “Bulldog” Fink, (Attendance—437,321 volumes). 13 Findings and comments these courses represent only part of (1) The Clinic does not now represent their teaching load. The history of the Clinic an inordinate portion of the College’s Clinic has been a movement from full­ budget. Although there is a greater time involvement by a particular cost to the kind of education which faculty member to a part-time program Clinic represents, as a share of the involvement. total budget it is not large. (6) A problem faced by the present (2) The alumni survey, which was the Clinic is the belief of some students reviewed first comprehensive survey of its that clinical education is irrelevant to alumni that the College has ever their career objectives. A related The following is a final report (without undertaken, presented most interesting problem is the erroneous perception attachments) of a special committee results; it was supplemented by a that the skills learned in a clinical appointed to review the clinic number of letters where particular course whose subject matter is not the program. We thought that our alumni alumni expressed their points of view first choice of the student, are not might be interested in our current in greater detail. The most salient transferable to other areas of practice. thinking on this important topic: statistic emerging from the survey was Early in this academic year, Dean that 68.4% of the alumni would (7) Additional reasons why students Meeks appointed a special committee, recommend that present students take today fail to take clinical courses are made up of members of the Academic clinical courses. They would like to see detailed in the summary of the Affairs and Clinic Committees, under clinical courses in a greater number of responses to the student survey which the chairmanship of Professor Howard subjects than are presently offered, is attached. Many of these problems Fink, to evaluate the current clinic and not oriented solely to criminal would be alleviated if there were more operation and make suggestions for law, juvenile law or poverty law. On clinical courses with a broader subject future planning. balance, this represented a very strong range, such as commercial law, endorsement of the concept of clinical taxation, the prosecutorial function, Among the questions that concerned education from those alumni who etc. This broadened range of courses the committee were: does the clinic have graduated from the College would attract more students for their account for an inordinate amount of during the past decade and were content as well as dispel any existing the College’s budget; are clinical present in law school when the current belief that there is narrowness in the courses felt to be worthwhile by the pattern of clinical courses was offered. dimension of clinical education. students and alumni; why do students elect clinic courses or fail to do so; (3) The results of the student survey (8) Adequate sources of input to the does the clinic have an “image” which indicated a desire for more clinical Dean and to the Director now exist to hampers enrollment; what is the courses in different fields of law, and, deal in advance with the commitment theoretical basis of clinical education; at the same time, a lack of knowledge of major Clinic resources to particular has its time passed; should the clinic about the clinical courses which are extensive litigation. be integrated with other programs of presently offered and about clinical (9) The Committee considers that the the College in some manner? education in general. Alumni and Student Surveys To answer these questions, we (4) A survey of the literature, made demonstrate a need for students to undertook the following modes of by Professors Rogers and Herman, receive more information about clinic courses than they have received in the evaluation: assisted by Barbara Ayres, J. D., 1978, came to the conclusion that we past. (1) an examination of the College could get little assistance from the (10) Clinical courses would be budget and that part of the budget writings on the field, in helping us to which could be attributed to the clinic. enhanced if they stood, not apart from plan for the future. the rest of the curriculum, but rather (2) a survey of all persons who (5) A source of strength of our Clinic were made to be the culmination of a graduated from the College during the is the integration of its faculty with comprehensive and coordinated years 1970-1978 to determine their other faculty members of the College. program dealing with practice and evaluation of courses they had elected This should continue and be advocacy skills. For that reason, as in law school; their reasons for not enhanced. We reiterate the principle well as the intrinsic merit of the plan, electing more clinical courses in law that those faculty members who teach we propose such a program as a school; and, from the perspective of clinical courses are fully major result of this study of clinical graduates, their assessment of the interchangeable with other faculty operations. Such a program would, in worth of clinical courses. members and are held to the same our judgment, be unique and (3) similar survey of all present expectations of scholarly achievement innovative and would address the second- and third-year students to as other faculty members; both before current concern of bench and bar as to determine their attitudes toward the tenure has been granted and after that the need for improved practice and clinical courses which are offered and point, throughout the career of the advocacy skills on the part of law their view of the fields which clinical clinical faculty member. There should graduates. courses should include. in fact be no separate clinical faculty. Proposals (4) a review of the literature of clinical Faculty members may teach more or education to determine if it could give fewer or no clinical courses. Even for We propose that clinical courses be us guidelines for evaluating our those who do teach clinical courses, incorporated into a new and enlarged program or suggestions for the future. 14 endeavor dealing with practice and coordinating, not supervisory, function Advantages of the proposed advocacy skills, under the supervision as to the pre-trial and trial practice program and guidance of the present Clinic courses. The Committee advances this proposal director, who would become the (a) The Director will consult with for creation of a Program of Practice Director of the Program of Practice teachers of these courses to ascertain and Advocacy Skills with the belief and Advocacy Skills. The program course content, in order to avoid that its implementation will achieve the would involve a sequence of courses duplication with instruction in the following objectives: leading to enhanced training in live-case and pre-clinic courses. practice and advocacy skills. (b) The Director further will provide (1) The Program will permit the input and suggestions concerning development of a coordinated In the first year, students presently sequence of courses in practice and take civil procedure, legal research course content with a view to achieving a logical progression in advocacy skills by providing a focal and writing and moot court. If a instruction in practice and advocacy point for communication among first-year writing program is adopted, skills. teachers of all subjects related to its this would enrich the background purpose. leading toward the enlarged upper (c) The Director will ascertain class program. In the upper class, the equipment and resource needs of (2) The Program will allow such following changes are suggested for these courses, as well as the live-case development without impinging upon gradual implementation over the next and pre-clinic courses, and plan the academic freedom of teachers of few years: acquisitions for their joint benefit. related subjects, because the Director (d) The Director will develop grant will have coordinating and (1) An enlarged trial practice course, proposals for funding of practice and recommending functions, only with called Trial Advocacy, a six-hour, advocacy courses as deemed beneficial respect to courses other than the fifteen-week course, which would to the program. live-case and pre-clinic courses. A combine the preparation and collegial input function of the Director presentation of a trial with greater (7) The Director will have the as to such courses is perceived as consideration of the practical problems responsibility to integrate the Practice benefitting the school’s educational of the rules of evidence. and Advocacy Skills Program with mission without interfering with the other aspects of the College’s mission. (2) A second-year “pre-clinic” course, authority of each teacher over his or This responsibility will include the her courses. which would deal with client following functions: interviewing, case-preparation, and the (3) The Program will permit an management of litigation. Such a (a) The Director will consult with the teachers of the Evidence and Federal on-going monitoring of how well course will be offered on an students are developing basic skills in experimental basis next year. Courts courses in order to build on these courses in the Practice and the first-year skills courses, to permit (3) A pre-trial practice course, Advocacy Skills Program. The Director alterations in those courses where evolving from the present pleading further will provide input and greater emphasis is needed in course, to deal with pre-trial and suggestions as to course content as particular areas. post-trial motions, discovery practice, deemed appropriate. (4) The Program will permit an pre-trial conference and case (b) The Director will report to teachers efficient use of funds for the preparation. of first year skills courses as to acquisition of equipment and resource (4) An enlarged number of clinical perceived deficiencies in skills that materials useful to various practice and offerings would be created. These students in practice and advocacy advocacy courses. courses would be taken by students courses should have mastered at the (5) The Program will facilitate who had already acquired skills from first-year level. informing students of the range of the pre-trial practice and pre-clinic (8) We propose that funds be courses available towards the course and might be taken at the same appropriated for the preparation of a development of practice and advocacy time as the students were taking the brochure describing the Program of skills. enlarged course in trial advocacy. The Practice and Advocacy Skills for (6) The Program will demonstrate a added courses might deal with subjects distribution to students to assist with dedication by this College of Law to such as business regulation; the course selection. The brochure should the sound development of legal skills. prosecutorial function; labor relations give detailed descriptions of clinic and arbitration; environmental offerings as well as other aspects of (7) The Program is conceived with the regulation; tax litigation; employee the program which would be a belief that a sound skills program does health and safety; and other new foundation for the clinical courses. not detract from the study of subjects. The Director should provide an substantive legal principles and issues, orientation session for first- and but rather enhances such study by (5) The Director of the Program of requiring application of principles of Practice and Advocacy Skills will have second-year students prior to the time for course registration at which a substantive law in concrete supervisory authority over live-case situations—live or simulated. offerings, to the same extent as the discussion of the program can take present Director of the Clinical place. (8) The Program will be attractive to potential law school applicants, Program has over them, and will have (9) In sum, we propose to integrate providing assurance of a well- the same authority over the pre-clinic clinical courses into a much more course. conceived educational program ambitious program of practice and integrating skills development into the (6) The Director will have a advocacy skills. overall pedogogical mission. 15 Faculty Relations Board: 1977”, appearing in 39 “The Boat People,” and spoke on a Ohio State Law Journal 1 (1978), and WOSU radio program on “The Jury published an article entitled “Supreme System—Is It Outmoded?”. He also Court Labor and EEO Decisions: October presented a commentary on “U.S. Policy news Term, 1977” which he wrote for Towards Vietnam” on WOSU radio in -presentation at the 1978 Midwest Labor reaction to remarks made earlier by a Law Conference. Most recently, he has WOSU commentator, and spoke on written a review of a book by Douglas L. Cincinnati radio station WAIF about a case Leslie, entitled “Cases and Materials on for which he had written an amicus curiae Labor Law”, which appears in 65 Virginia brief for the Ohio Supreme Court which Law Review 773 (1979), and published an challenged the constitutionality of the Ohio article entitled “The Supreme Court and statute on same-sex sexual solicitation. Diversification of the National Labor Professor Quigley was interviewed on Policy” in 12 University of California, Davis WCMH-TV about the reaction at OSU to Law Review 37 (1979). the takeover of the American Embassy in Michael Rose, co-editor with Leo Raskind Tehran. He spoke at the University of of Advanced Federal Income Taxation: Dayton Law School on the proposed Corporate Transactions: Cases, Materials revision of the Federal Criminal Code and L. Orin Slagle is serving the second year of and Problems (1978, West Publishing gave a presentation on that same topic at a two-year term as President of the Law Company), recently wrote the revision to the Annual Meeting of the National School Admissions Council, which is Selected Federal Taxation Statutes and Conference of State Legislatures in composed of a representative from each Regulations (1979 edition), published by Washington, D.C. ABA accredited law school, and is West Publishing Company. Professor Quigley spoke on “Israeli Land currently studying Truth and Testing Michael Kindred, editor of The Mentally Laws” in Ann Arbor Michigan, sponsored Legislation. He served on a panel Retarded Citizen and The Law (1976, Free by the Arab Student Association of the discussion “A Sociology of Legal Education Press), made a presentation on August 13 University of Michigan. Professor Quigley and of the Profession” at a meeting of the to the American Bar Association Family also spoke at Capital University Law Council on Legal Education and Law Section on “The Supreme Court and School as part of the symposium, “Human Professional Responsibility in Biscayhe, the Handicapped.” Professor Kindred has Rights and Economic Realities,” sponsored Florida. completed a model statute on “The by the International Law Society. His topic Gregory Travalio,published an article Treatment of Developmentally Disabled was “Expropriation of U.S. Property in recently in the Ohio State Law Journal, Persons in the Criminal Justice System.” Developing Countries.” He served as Volume 40, No. 2, 1979, entitled “Suffer The statute is part of a larger legislative commentator on a panel on the criminal the Little Children—But Not in My reform project of the American Bar justice system in the USSR at the annual Neighborhood: A Constitutional View of Association Commission on the Mentally convention of the Academy of Criminal Age—Restrictive Housing”. Shortly, Disabled. Professor Kindred has also Justice Sciences, in Cincinnati, Ohio, and his article, co-authored with Rebecca written a chapter for a psychologists’s gave an address on the same subject at the Clement, “International Protection of manual on “Psychologists and University of Cincinnati College of Law. Marine Mammals,” will appear in the Developmental Disabilities Law” and has Professor Quigley presented slide-talks on Columbia Journal of Environmental Law. been awarded a grant from the Dana his December, 1978, trip to Vietnam to the Columbus Chapter of the National Lawyers P. John Kozyris lectured to the law faculty Corporation Foundation to support comparative law research during the Guild and to the Women’s Action and students at the Louisiana State Collective. University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on 1980-81 academic year. the “Trust and Its Equivalence in the Civil Earl Finbar Murphy-.Viifis luncheon Law System.” He presented a paper John Quigley yjas interviewed last May on speaker at Hueston Woods, Ohio, for the entitled “International Codes Affecting WTVN-TV News about the execution of Conference on Land Use Planning for Business Transactions” to a group of John Spenkelink. He wrote an opinion Local Officials. His topic was “Private businessmen, lawyers and government editorial entitled “Immigration Law Used in Property Rights versus The Public officials. The presentation was made under Political Harassment” which appeared in Welfare.” The conference was sponsored the auspices of the Columbus Area the Columbus Dispatch. Professor Quigley by the Ohio Department of Natural Chamber of Commerce, Columbus Bar reviewed a book by Garrison: “Israel, The Resources, the School of Natural Association and U.S. Department of West Bank and International Law” which Resources of the OSU College of Commerce in the course of a one-day appeared in volume 8 of the Journal of Agriculture, and the Ohio Extension conference on “A Businessman’s Palestine Studies (Summer, 1979). From Service. Professor Murphy has served as a Introduction to the Legal Aspects of August 15-19, he served as an observer at member of the editorial board of the International Trade and Investment.” He the genocide trial of former governmental American Journal of Legal History since participated in a conference on “Current leaders of Cambodia, in Phnom Penh, 1969. Most recently, he has reviewed Trends in Legal Education” held in Cambodia. Professor Quigley also testified manuscripts entitled “Jeremy Bentham, Thessaloniki, Greece, on the occasion of for the sub-committee on criminal justice of Utility and the Legislator” by Brian W. the 50 anniversary of the Thessaloniki Law the House Judicial Committee on the Taylor and “ ‘Smiling Through Her Tears: School, and presented a paper on recent proposed revision of the Federal Criminal Ante-Bellum Southern Women and developments in teaching methods. Code in Washington, D.C. He also testified Divorce” by Jane Turner Censer. He has before the Agriculture and Natural also reviewed a manuscript entitled “The Lee Modjeska has authored several articles Resources Committee of the Ohio House Use of Literacy and the Emergence of Law recently, the first of which is entitled “The of Representatives on a proposal to restrict in Ancient Greece” for Visible Language, Uncertain Miranda Fuel Doctrine”, 38 Ohio foreign ownership of farmland in Ohio. the Journal for Research on the Visual State Law Journal 807 (1977). In addition, Professor Quigley was interviewed on a Media of Language Expression, of the he published an article entitled Chicago radio program on the topic of Cleveland Museum of Art. “Commentaries on the National Labor

16 Earl Finbar Murphy and Joanne Wharton served on a panel lecturing on “The Use of Murphy will serve as visiting Professors at Excellence: The Job Ahead.” Professor Freedom of Information Act” and related Howard served on a panel on the the University of Arizona College of Law at laws in immigration proceedings. He Tucson, from January to June of 1980. contributions of Black Women to Higher appeared on the WOSU radio “Access”, Education during United Black World Mr. Murphy is also scheduled to have a debating the issue of “Police Use of book published by Pergamon Press in Week at OSU. The subject under Force.’’Another debate on that topic was March, 1980, entitled Energy and discussion was “Ticket to Power: The Price presented at the Law School between Goes Up, Again.” She also addressed the Environmental Balance. In addition, Mr. Professor Jacobs and Professor Berkes, Murphy published an article which Columbus Area Civil Rights Council who teaches Management Science and is a appeared in 39 Ohio State Law Journal Annual Meeting on “Recent Developments Columbus police officer. More recently, in Sex Discrimination Law.” At the 10th 752 (1978) entitled “Future of the Law for Professor Jacobs and Chris Blair, who is a Energy and Environment”. National Conference on Women and the supervising lawyer for the Law School’s Law in Ssn Antonio, Texas, Professor Frank K. Upham will teach 4 hours of a 4 Civil Law Clinic, are handling the appeal Howard gave the following presentations: credit student seminar on Japanese civil of an Ohio woman to the U.S. Supreme “Sex Discriminatory Practices in Health and rights at Harvard Law School in January. Court in a case which raises the issue of Disability Insurance: A Technical Review of He has written an article which will appear whether in a civil case, it is constitutionally the Use of Sex Based Actuarial Tables,” in Ecology Law Quarterly, vol. 8, number permissible for a state to deny a free “Affirmative Action in Sex Education: The 2, and another in Japanese which will transcript to an indigent plaintiff who Impact of Bakke upon the Opportunities appear in Amerika Ho, a Japanese wishes to appeal. Professor Jacobs spoke for Minority Women,” and “The Use of journal. Professor Upham addressed to the Columbus Metropolitan Club on the Sex Based Mortality Tables in University the SUNY-Buffalo School of topic “Should Columbus Have A Civilian Pension Plans: The Impact of Manhart v. Law faculty on “Recent Trends in Review Board?” The panel also included The City of Los Angeles. ” She also Japanese Environmental Litigation”. He is Professor Lance Tibbies from Capital addressed the National Lawyers Guild currently serving as chairperson of the East University Law School and Sergeant Ross Midwest Regional Meeting on Asian Library Committee of OSU’s East Rader of the Fraternal Order of Police, “Reproductive Health Issues and the Rights Asian Studies Program, and has completed Lodge # 9. of Working Women.” five monographs for the Encyclopedia of Japan dealing with various aspects of Stanley K. Laughlin §erved as a panel James Meeks spoke on “The Future of Japanese law. member at the Fifth Interprofessional Legal Education” to the Dayton Bar Conference on Ethical Issues in Privacy Association and made a presentation on LeRoy Pernell published an article entitled and Confidentiality: An Interprofessional that same topic at a luncheon meeting for Interim Detentidn of Juvenile Delinquents Approach, in Columbus, Ohio, recently the law firm of Porter, Wright, Morris & in Ohio: A Proposal for Controlling and addressed the annual meeting of the Arthur. Judicial Discretion”, 39 Ohio State Law American Civil Liberties Union on “The Howard Fink is currently visiting professor Journal 306 (1978). He has also published Future of School Integration” in Dayton of law at the George Washington a 1979 Supplement of Civil Procedure Ohio. University National Law Center in Forms in West Ohio Practice Series, Washington, D.C. Volumes 11-12. He gave a presentation Rhonda R. Rivera was a participant in a on “Legal Issues and Responsibilities in John Henderson, a member of the two-week summer project for the study Programs, Education & Pre-Law Genetic Counseling” before the Genetics and application of humanistic education in and Genetic Counseling Center, Childrens Committee of the Law School Admission law. She served as a panelist at the Annual Council, coordinated a workshop for pre­ Hospital and the OSU School of Allied Meeting of the American Psychological Medical Professions. Professor Pernell also law advisers from the southeastern states, Association in New York City which which was held in Atlanta on November spoke on “Sexism and Racism in the considered the subject “Lesbian Mothers Juvenile Justice System” before the 16, 1979. He also addressed pre-law and Children: Psychological, Social and advisers from Ohio at the Regional Pre- Association of Juvenile Justice in Ohio and Legal Issues”; she also served as a panelist on that same subject for the National Law Advisers Conference at Capital for the AALS Workshop on Professional University Law School, which was held in Council on Crime and Delinquency. Development of the Woman Law Teacher Recently, he delivered a speech entitled the school’s new building on South High in Cincinnati, Ohio, and the Midwest Street, Columbus. “Beyond the Best Interest of the Child” Conference on Women and the Law, in before the OSU Department of Psychology Ann Arbor, Michigan, which dealt with Michael Perry published an article in the Colloquial Series. such subjects as Family Law Developments October, 1979, issue of the Columbia Law and Lesbian Custody Litigation. She Review: “Modern Equal Protection: A Louis Jacobs has twice appeared on local attended a conference on Equality Conceptualization and Appraisal.” In late cable television, QUBE “Both Sides Now”, sponsored by The Society of American October, Professor Perry was a speaker at first to debate the topic of “Controlling Law Teachers, and was a commentator

17 the firm of Bell, Boyd, Lloyd, Haddad & the Duke Law Journal. Their article was Switzerland. Presently, Professor Reichman Burns in Chicago, Illinois, where he written in the form of a hypothetical is teaching a section of the first year remained until 1965. After serving as vice judicial opinion. In addition, Professor contracts course and will be teaching a president of Capital Food Industries, Inc., Sowle and his wife, Professor Kathryn D. course in copyright law Spring Quarter. in Chicago, from 1965-1969, he became a Sowle, have signed a contract with Bobbs- Jeremy C. Wicker is a visiting professor partner with the firm of Prescott, Merrill, Merrill Publishing Company to write a during the 1979-80 academic year, Turbin & Co. (Investment Bankers) in treatise on “Constitutional Torts” in the teaching a section of the first year civil Cleveland, Ohio, where he remained until next year. procedure course and offering, as well, 1973. From 1973-1976, Professor Kadens Kathryn D. Sowle hay published an conflicts, federal courts and admiralty. served as executive vice president of the article, “Defamation and the First Professor Wicker is a member of the faculty Cleveland Trust Realty Investors. After Amendment: The Case for a Constitutional of Texas Tech University School of Law. serving as a visiting associate professor of Privilege of Fair Report”, in the New York He is a graduate of the Yale Law School law at Toledo College of Law from University Law Review, Volume 54, June, (1972) where he also received his L.L.M. 1976-1977, he was appointed to the 1979, which came out in December. He served as a law clerk to the Honorable regular faculty as associate professor where David W. Dyer, Judge, U.S. Court of he has remained since 1977. He is a Lawrence Herman was recently honored Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Professor by being recognized as Professor of the member of the Order of the Coif and Wicker has written extensively in the teaches subjects including accounting, Year by the graduating class of 1979. In federal civil procedure area. addition, he was recently appointed to the agency and partnerships, business Presidents Club Professorship, and recently Terry A. Bethel served as a visiting associations, corporations, corporate published an article with Chades professor during the summer of 1979. An finance, estates, insurance, federal taxation Thompson entitled “Scott v. Illinois and associate professor at the University of and trusts. the Right to Counsel: A Decision in Search Missouri Law School in Columbia, he John C. McCoid, the Armistead M. Dobie of a Doctrine?” which appears in 17 received his B.A. (1968) and his J. D. Professor at the University of Virginia American Criminal Law Review 71 (1979). (1971) from The Ohio State University School of Law, also served as a visiting Mr. Herman published an article in the during which time he served as managing professor during the Summer Quarter of June, 1979, edition of the Alvis House editor of the Ohio State Law Journal. After 1979. He received a B.A. (1950) and a Newsletter entitled “Against the Death his admission to the Ohio Bar in 1971, he L.L.B. (1953) from Vanderbilt University Penalty”. On July 12, he delivered a joined the Columbus law firm of George, during which time he served as editor-in- speech on the death penalty at the Annual Greek, King, McMahon & McConnaughey chief of the Vanderbilt Law Review. He Meeting of the Cleveland Chapter of the where he practiced until 1977. In addition, served as a teaching fellow at Harvard American Civil Liberties Union, and was he served as an adjunct professor at The during 1956-57 and joined the regular interviewed on five Cleveland radio and Ohio State University College of Law faculty at the University of Virginia in television programs. Professor Herman was during fall of 1974. He is a member of the 1957, was appointed to associate professor interviewed on WBNS-TV’s public affairs Order of the Coif and his instructional in 1960, and was appointed to rank of full program, “The Issue,” on the subject of the areas include arbitration, commercial law, professor in 1963. He is a member of the death penalty and participated in a debate employment discrimination, federal Order of the Coif and his subjects of on that subject with State Representative jurisdiction, labor law and trial practice. instruction include civil procedure, Terry Tranter at the OSU College of Law. Nancy S. Erickson, also a summer visiting creditors’ rights and bankruptcy, and Professor Herman also spoke as a guest professor, is an associate professor with the securities litigation. lecturer in an OSU undergraduate New York Law School. She received her criminology class about criminalization A.B. from (1967) Baxter College and her (what behavior should be made criminal). Robert A. Sedler, professor, Wayne State J.D. (1973) from Brooklyn Law School. University Law School, also served as a Robert J. Lynn participated with Michael During law school she served as visiting professor during Summer Quarter Rose in a serrtinar on Estate Planning editor-in-chief of Brooklyn Law Review. of 1979. He received a B.A. (1956) and a 'which was presented by the OSU After her admission to the Bar of New J.D. (1959) from the University of Development Fund. York in 1974, she was associated with the Pittsburgh during which time he served as Jerome H. Reichman was appointed an firm of Botein, Hays, Sklar & Herzberg book review editor for the University of assistant professor beginning with the from 1973-1975. From 1975-1977, she Pittsburgh Law Review. Admitted to the 1979-80 academic year. Professor served as assistant professor at the New Bars of D.C. (1959) and Kentucky (1968), Reichman received his B.A. cum laude York Law School until her appointment to he served as assistant and associate from the University of Chicago in 1955, her present position. Her areas of professor at St. Louis from 1961-1965; attended Yale Law School from instruction include conflict of laws, associate professor and assistant dean, 1955-1957, at which time he served as domestic relations and evidence. She has Haile Sellassie I University, Addis Ababa, comment editor of the Yale Law Journal, lectured and authored articles in the areas Ethiopia, 1963-1966; associate professor, and then after an interval of 20 years, of sex-based discrimination and domestic 1966-1968, and professor from received his J.D. degree from Yale in relations. 1968-1977 at the University of Kentucky; 1979. During the interval between his Michael G. Kadens, associate professor at visiting professor, Iowa, spring of 1970; second and third years at Yale Law the University of Toledo College of Law, visiting professor, Washington University, School, Professor Reichman was engaged served as a visitor during the Summer St. Louis, spring of 1976; visiting in various international pursuits beginning Quarter of 1979. He received a B.A. professor, Cornell, 1976-77, and • with a Fulbright Fellowship for the study of (1956) from the University of Michigan and professor, Wayne State, since 1977. He is Hindu Family Law in 1958-59 and his J.D. (1959) from Stanford, where he a member of Phi Beta Kappa, Order, of the culminating as senior editor, Editorial and also served as associate comment editor for Coif, served as general council for the Publishing Section, International Trade the Stanford Law Review. Subsequent to ACLU of Kentucky from 1971-1976 and Centre UNCTAB-GATT, Geneva, his admission to the Bars of California and was a member of the ACLU Desegregation Illinois in 1960, he became associated with Task Force.

18 President Enarson greets the Fullmers (Dave, ’56) at spring Presidents Club reception.

The following list includes John O. Boyle those who have joined the James H. Bradner Univirsity’s Presidents Club David L. Brennan and designated part or all John W. Bricker, ’20 of their gift to the College James C. Britt, ’50 Presidents Club Paul W. Brown, ’39 of Law. To join the Howard N. Bullock, ’43 Presidents Club one must C. Simeral Bunch, ’70 make a gift of $10,000, to James R. Burchfield, ’49 designated gifts be completed in not more Clair M. Carlin, '72 than ten years, or by David P. Carlin, ’63 including a bequest in a will Thomas W. Carton, Jr., ’73 of not less than $30,000, Geoffrey V. Case, ’78 or by purchasing a life John F. Casey, ’65 help College insurance policy payable to Thomas E. Cavendish, ’53 the University with a value Jack H. Chabot George H. Chamblin, ’32 of not less than $30,000. If Anita E. Chapman you might have an interest James E. Chapman, ’54 in joining the Presidents Bruce L. Christy, ’62 of Law Club, please contact Dean Alphonse P. Cincione, ’61 Meeks. Arthur R. Cline, ’25 Christine D. Cline William R. Cobourn, ’71 Presidents William L. Coleman, ’39 Michael F. Colley, ’61 Club members Philip M. Collins, ’73 Robert C. Coplan, ’42 Elizabeth C. Allen Shirley Coplan Gerald O. Allen, ’42 Marshall Cox, ’59 George W. Ankney, ’59 Philip W. Cramer, ’71 William E. Arthur, ’53 John W. Creighton, Jr., ’58 Ward Ashman, ’32 Raymond R. Cunningham, ’50 Robert J. Aubuchon Nancy R. Cupps, ’65 Edward A. Bacome, ’69 Ben A. Daniel Richard W. Bailey, ’57 Jacob E. Davis Robert B. Barnett, Jr., ’75 Jacob E. Davis, II, ’63 Frank E. Bazler, ’53 M. Nancy Davis James R. Beatley, Jr., ’65 Sallie E. Davis John C. Berryhill, ’70 John C. Deal, ’74 Dan J. Binau John P. DiFalco, ’68 William E. Blaine, Jr., ’52 Richard S. Donahey, ’68 James B. Blumenstiel, ’67 Elizabeth G. Drinko Donald Borror, ’54 John D. Drinko, ’44 19 Jack W. Nicklaus John B. Nordholt, Jr., ’39 James D. Oglevee, ’53 Timothy A. Oliver C. William O’Neill Harold D. Paddock, III, ’73 Thomas F. Patton, ’26 Douglas L. Peterman Ethel B. Peterson James W. Phillips, ’49 Jack D. Potts, ’49 Catherine H. Power Malcolm M. Prine, ’52 Robert A. Ramsey, ’49 William E. Ranee, ’51 Frank D. Ray, ’67 Frank A. Ray, ’73 J. Gilbert Reese, ’52 Louella Hodges Reese William J. Reidenbach, ’54 Dean G. Reinhard, ’65 Ricky L. Richards, ’75 David Riebel, ’65 H. Wesley Robinson Stewart M. Rose Russell R. Saxby, ’35 Bradley Schaeffer, ’43 Herbert O. Schear, ’32 Gerald E. Schlafman, ’54 Melvin L. Schottenstein, ’58 Edward A. Schrag, Jr. Stanley Schwartz, Jr., ’47 Paul A. Scott, ’56 Paul O. Scott Willis O. Serr, II, ’75 Four deans, L. Orin Slagle, James Kirby, Ivan Rutledge and James Meeks, meet at the Norman W. Shibley, ’49 spring Presidents Club reception. Donald A. Sibbring Kermit C. Sitterley, ’33 Paul M. Smart, ’53 John B. Dwyer, ’52 Harry L. Henning Alfred C. LeFeber, ’50 J. Ewing Smith, ’32 Charles W. Ebersold, Jr., ’38 John J. Heron, ’65 David B. Lehman Stephen J. Smith, ’71 Florence W. Ebersold Joseph S. Heyman, ’37 Richard R. Leslie Thomas L. Smith Edwin M. Ellman, ’55 James T. Houfek, ’69 Thomas C. B. Letson, ’52 William W. Stanhope, ’43 J. Richard Emens Robert H. Huffer, ’54 Donald J. Lett, ’49 Lawrence D. Stanley Grace Heck Faust, ’30 Dwight I. Hurd, ’59 Seymour H. Levy Richard L. Steinberger, ’64 Leo H. Faust, ’26 John D. Hvizdos, ’75 Harry S. Littman, ’28 Geoffrey Stern, ’68 Pearl Feibel J. Wellor Igo, ’32 Alan B. Loop, ’33 Craig M. Stewart, ’67 Dorothy Binyon Sullivan, ’35 Troy A. Feibel, ’31 Duane L. Isham, ’53 George C. McConnuaghey, Jr., Robert P. Fite, ’47 Richard G. Ison, ’53 ’51 Stuart A. Summit, ’59 J. Robert Ford, ’67 Sidney D. L. Jackson, Jr., ’25 John G. McCoy John T. Tait Charles F. Freiburger, ’70 Gerald S. Jacobs, ’62 John P. McMahon, ’42 Robert E. Tait Bradley Frick Harry P. Jeffrey, Sr., ’26 J. Paul McNamara, ’32 Kenneth M. Taylor, ’69 Duke W. Thomas, ’64 Carl B. Fry, ’74 C. Gordon Jelliffe Mary McNamara Dwight L. Fullerton, Jr., ’53 Elizabeth K. Jones James O. Mahoy, ’53 Suzan Barnes Thomas, ’72 David R. Fullmer, ’56 Gwen Kagey Jerry L. Maloon James H. Tilberry, ’51 Roy E. Gabbert, ’52 David A. Katz, ’57 Frederick M. Mann, ’68 Ida Topper Robert W. Gardier, Jr., ’77 Ronald W. Kauffman Philip M. Manogg, ’74 Dennis L. Travis, ’65 John M. Garmhausen, ’73 Joseph P. Kelley, ’68 Eva Markus Anne K. Tsitouris Peter J. Gee, ’62 David A. Kelly George D. Massar, ’49 Thomas M. Tyack, ’65 Noel F. George, ’32 James P. Kennedy Michael H. Mearan, ’71 John W. Van Dervoort, ’54 Charles F. Glander, ’59 Timothy P. Kenny Edward J. Mellen Arthur I. Vorys, ’49 Richard D. Goldberg Stephen W. King, ’72 Donald E. Miller, ’53 George R. Walker, ’52 William A. Goldman, ’66 William P. Kinsey, ’70 Steven A. Miller, ’73 Paul F. Ward, ’39 Geoffrey S. Goll, ’73 Carter C. Kissell, ’27 John T. Mills, Jr., ’73 Robert J. Watkins, ’53 Rafael A. Gonzalez, ’32 C. William Klausman, III, ’67 Charles D. Minor, ’52 William W. Wehr, ’58 N. Victor Goodman Scott M. Knisley, ’53 Daniel J. Minor Robert S. Wells, ’77 Darold I. Greek, ’32 Robert A. Koblentz, ’70 Robert W. Minor, ’48 Robert W. Werth, ’65 Eugene Green, ’42 Gavin R. Larrimer, ’61 Susan Brown Moore, .’71 James F. White, Jr., ’65 Benjamin W. Hale, Jr., ’70 Thomas K. Larva Michael E. Moritz, ’61 James F. White, Sr. • Lydia W. Pollack Hall Lester S. Lash, ’61 William A. Morse, ’72 Ronald L. Wollett, ’69 J. Richard Hamilton, ’56 James K. L. Lawrence, ‘65 James E. Newlon Thomas E. Workman, ’69 David S. Hay, ’74 Russell Leach, ’49 Barbara Bash Nicklaus David J. Young, ’55 20 Friends of the College recognized

Listed are the names of Calss of 1926 Francis H. Lang J. Gareth Hitchcock alumni and friends who Melvin R. Bergman Luke H. Lyman Leon P. Loechler made gifts to the College Leo H. Faust Phillip A. Millstone Eugene J. Mahoney during the 1978 calendar Randall F. Fullmer Ellsworth A. Moats Lowell Murr Arthur E. Orlean year. These funds have Richard B. Hardman, Jr. Herbert O. Schear Harry P. Jeffrey, Sr. J. Ewing Smith John G. Sarber been used to support a Robert H. Wead C. K. Spreng variety of law school Abe R. Kipperman Joseph S. Kreinberg Total: $17,468.50 Harold Stein activities such as: Paul F. Ward Moe L. Okun Class of 1933 Moot Court Programs Thomas Patton Ithamar D. Weed Murray Friedman Student Organizations Robert N. Suid George D. Young Charles E. Hoffman Total: $2,580.00 Student Financial Aid Class of 1927 C. Merle Igo The Library Herman D. Emerman Fred C. Parcher Class of 1940 Faculty Teaching and Robert H. French Mrs. Sara H. Schwartz Glenn Detting Research Support Louis Gelbman James J. Weaver John W. Lehrer Support for Faculty Carter C. Kissell Total: $120.00 John J. Lynch John F. Locke William S. Miller Participation in Professional Class 1934 Association Activity Frank W. Nicholas Roger H. Smith Howard W. Adkins Client Counseling Programs Leslie C. Ward Total: $170.00 James W. Williamson Henry S. Ballard, Jr. Ohio State Law Journal Clyde C. Beery Class of 1941 OSU Law Record Class of 1928 Philipp L. Charles John R. Eastman Alumni Activities William E. Downing Jack G. Evans J. Gordon Peltier Guest Speakers Class of 1929 Harry C. Fink Judson C. Schuler Russell B. Holding David A. Weble Student Research Montgomery Campbell Stanley R. Scholz Don Williamson Assistantships Samuel B. Erskine Harace W. Troop Student Awards for William K. Fenton Total: $320.00 Carl C. Tucker Outstanding A. G. Lancione Class of 1942 Total: $365.00 Achievement Joe H. Nathanson Louis Gray Albert K. Ridout Class of 1935 We thank you all for Eugene Green Arthur Rubin Don S. Cameron, Sr. William J. Lohr helping to improve legal Robert E. Schumaker Morton D. Gumble John P. McMahon education. Total: (Classes through 1929) Robert E. Leach Robert L. Raudabaugh $8,529.88 The Fifty-Year Club Henry W. Wolf Sally L. Weed Total: $45.00 Jack F. Young (Including all classes thru Class of 1930 1929) Total: $4,447.50 Mrs. Willeen L. Benedum Class of 1936 Class of 1903 Thomas S. Bretherton Robert B. Gosline Class of 1943 William P. Moloney William K. Davis Edwin R. Teple Louis B. Conkle ' Samuel Freifield Seymour A. Terrell William C. Dagger Class of 1911 C. Emory Glander Total: $65.00 Ralph W. Lucas Marshall G. Fenton Bradley Schaeffer Howard S. Lutz Class of 1937 Class of 1914 George A. Schwer William W. Stanhope Paul P. Dull William L. Stewart Stanley Schwartz, Sr. Total: $795.00 Joseph L. Halberstein Total: $2,105.00 Class of 1917 Class of 1931 Joseph S. Heyman Elmer E. Jacobs Class of 1944 Earl G. King Ralph Carhart Edwin L. Mitchell John W. C. Knisely Robert L. Culbertson Charles A. Anderson William E. Dunlap, Sr. David M. Postlewaite John D. Drinko Class of 1919 Troy A. Feibel Edward J. Ruzzo Melvin L. Robins Albert B. Arbaugh Leo E. Forquer Total: $10,552.81 Total: $31,111.48 Class of 1921 George B. Marshall Class of 1938 Class of 1946 Paul R. Gingher Joseph A. Ujhelyi George W. Cole W. Howard Fort Karl H. Weaner, Jr. Class of 1922 Willis R. Deming Total: $30.00 Frank W. Wiley William M. Drennen J. Eugene Farber Total: $1,365.00 Victor C. Ketcham, Jr. Class of 1947 John C. Harlor Maurice J. Leen, Jr. Ralph E. Boyer Class of 1932 Class of 1924 Doris M. London Robert P. Fite James V. Armogida Herbert S. Beane Virginia E. Schinnerer Paul O. Hunsinger Lozier Caplan David T. G. Lum J. Robert Swartz John L. Hutson, Jr. George H. Chamblin Lewis A. Seikel, Sr. Robert W. Vandemark Francis S. McDaniel Raphael A. Gonzalez Edgar A. Silbaugh Total: $495.00 Dean W. Palmer Darold 1. Greek Grazio A. Piacintino Class of 1925 J. Wellor Igo Class of 1939 Stanley Schwartz, Jr. William W. Badger Raphael G. Jeter Paul W. Brown Total: $2,330.00 Harry Schwartz Ellis W. Kerr William L. Coleman 21 Warren A. Smith Class of 1948 Walter J. Siemer James C. Fitch George W. Stuhldreher Robert L. Hill Lawrence W. Stacey Allan J. Conkle Sewall F. Jackson John Y. Taggart James R. Dupler James M. Schaller, Jr. Charles G. Martis John VanAbel William E. Herron Total: $460.00 Robert A. McCarthy Roy A. West William M. Kochheiser Class of 1952 James W. Miller Frederick C. Zimmer Walter M. Lawson, Jr. Harrison L. Comstock William F. Newman Total: $4,005.00 Robert W. Minor John B. Dwyer Thor G. Ronemus William S. Moore James N. Ebright Steven Timonere Class of 1960 Charles A. Pike Roy E. Gabbert Donald W. Wiper, Jr. Daniel Adams David H. Putnam James F. Graham Total: $323.00 Larry R. Brown Gordon H. Savage John W. Henderson Edward R. Bunstine Homer D. Swygert Blaine B. Hunkins Class of 1956 John R. Casar Total: $1,951.67 Charles J. Kerester Donald W. Bennett William L. Clark Thomas C. B. Letson David R. Fullmer James C. Demos Class of 1949 Charles D. Minor J. Richard Hamilton Harry L. Dowler, Jr. William A. Ashbrook, Jr. E. William Mastrangelo Charles D. Hering G. Bradley Hummel Charles B. Ballou William W. Mosholder James R. Hinton Charles H. Huston James R. Burchfield Malcolm M. Prine. William B. Johnson Robert F. Linton William B. Devaney, Jr. Donald W. Revelle Henry Maser Rick E. Marsh Donald W. Fisher Clayton W. Rose, Jr. Charles D. Parke Charles R. Petree 11 Jack W. Folkerth B. Lyle Shafer Melvin Pearlman Jerome Robison David E. Friedlander Charles D. Shook Donald G. Schornak David H. Shawan William M. Fumich Thomas L. Tribbee Paul A. Scott Asriel Strip Richard 0 . Gantz George R. Walker Robert W. Siegel Irwin F. Woodland Kenneth R. Harkins John E. Wissler Richard F. Swope Total: $1,097.50 Roger J. Henkener Melvin J. Woodford Bonford R. Talbert, Jr. Class of 1961 Ralph W. Howard Total: $6,032.08 Joseph H. Yearling, Jr. Robert Kniffin Total: $2,286.00 David F. Allen Class of 1953 William B. Badger Russell Leach Class of 1957 Donald J. Lett James R. Addison, Jr. James R. Barton Charles A. Linch William E. Arthur James G. Annos Alphonse P. Cincione Webster S. Lyman, Jr. Eugene C. Barstow John F. Atkinson Gerald P. Flagel Robert J. Lynn Frank E. Bazler James M. Brennan Marcus E. Hanna James H. McGee Thomas E. Cavendish Robert J. Fairless Shelby V. Hutchins George D. Massar George V. Fisher Marc Gertner Philip Joelson Michael J. Pavick Dwight L. Fullerton Richard K. Garman Larry R. Langdon Robert A. Ramsey Leonard Goldbert Paul P. Gutmann Gavin R. Larrimer Lawrence H. Richardson Duane L. Isham John A. Hoskins Lester S. Lash George W. Rooney Richard G. Ison David R. Katz John C. McDonald John D. Schwenker Duane J. Kelleher Richard L. Loveland Kenneth R. Millisor Harry B. Shaefer John M. Kelly John F. Ramser Daniel M. Phillips Norman W. Shibley Scott M. Knisley Edward R. Reichek Arthur R. Pulskamp Arthur I. Vorys Frederick W. Lawrence Ralph W. Stultz William A. Reale T. Bryan Underwood, Jr. John C. Wagner James O. Mahoy Paul J. Stergios Roy L. Wildermuth, Jr. James D. Oglevee Joan E. Zuber George V. Voinovich Edward F. Whipps Total: $13,307.02 Leonard Oscar Total: $1,590.00 Robert N. Wistner Earnest C. Roberts Class of 1958 Class of 1950 Donald L. Rogers Total: $2,480.36 Richard L. Boring Thomas D. Beetham Paul M. Smart John W. Creighton, Jr. Class of 1962 Adrian F. Betleski Harold L. Talisman Joan M. Krauskopf James B. Atleson Harold E. Christman John M. Tobin Raymond P. Cunningham, Jr William W. Turpin Charles F. Kurfess James K. Brooker Ronald G. Logan James L. Caplinger Lloyd E. Fisher, Jr. Robert J. Watkins Donald S. Swepston Steven E. Cichon Lee O. Fitch Eugene R. Yazel Neal S. Tostenson Gerald S. Jacobs David W. Hart Total: $11,792.01 Alfred C. LeFeber Total: $830.00 Alan S. Kerxton Gaile D. Moore Julian O. Northcraft Class of 1954 Class of 1959 James L. Pazol John W. Schuler John M. Adams James J. Ashburn George W. Ankney, Jr. James R. Scott Total: $1,395.00 C. Arthur Wilson, Jr. Stephen E. Auch Albert L. Bell Class of 1951 James E. Chapman Charles E. Brant Total: $665.00 Marshall H. Cox, Jr. George W. Andrews Ernest J. Danco Class of 1963 R. Donald Cultice Robert H. Huffer James J. Cullers Norman T. Crout John A. DeVictor Roy L. Morris Albert W. Eoff Jacob Davis II ' Howard H. Harcha, Jr. Irving A. Portman R. Cliffton Gibbs Charles R. Gregg George C. Koons Richard G. Reichel Charles F. G lander Robert J. Holland Daniel H. Lease Gerald E. Schlafman Dwight 1. Hurd Larry Inscore Ronald H. Katila Earl 'N. Merwin Total: $2,297.50 William H. Macbeth Qharles F. O’Brien William E. Kessler Class of 1955 John G. Lancione James P. Miller Paul E. Paulson Stephen M. Miller Robert W. Phillips Rodney A. Baker Wayman C. Lawrence 111 Marvin R. Pliskin William E. Ranee Kenneth R. Callahan Frank E. Quirk 22 Frank E. Steel, Jr. Carter P. Neff Class of 1974 Evans Investment Co. Frank J. Uvena Norman J. Ogelvie Michael A. Baer Mrs. Mary Evans Eyerman Sarah S. Velman Harry W. Pettigrew William A. Boyd Mrs. Pearl B. Feibel Total: $2,501.80 Raymond J. Posgay James R. Cooper A. P. Feldman Clark R. Pritchett, Jr. Mrs. Augusta C. Frank Class of 1964 Charles J. Faruki Jerome R. Schindler Richard A. Fisher Robert H. French, Jr. Roger E. Bennington Jon M. Schorr Richard E. Flax Richard D. Goldbery Theresa Doss Terry S. Shilling William A. Grim Mrs. Edith F. Greentree David C. Faulkner Geoffrey Stern Elsie Hall Mrs. Kindra W. Gregg James R. Gregg William R. Thyer George W. Rooney, Jr. Mrs. Catherine S. Graf David C. Kelley J. Stephen Van Heyde Lyle Saylor Mrs. Dorotha E. Ham Richard L. Steinberger James W. Wheeler Alan B. Schaeffer Mr. & Mrs. Walter Hattenbach Albert S. Tabor, Jr. Richard A. Yoss Hugh R. Whiting Mrs. Jane C. Hawk Duke W. Thomas John L. Zinkand Total: $160.00 Mrs. Virginia S. Heyman Charles J. Tyburski Total: $1,942.50 Jeffrey T. Hodge Class of 1975 Total: $43,617.89 Class of 1969 Mrs. Joanne J. Howard Deborah L. Edwards Edwin W. Jones Class of 1965 William M. Isaac William J. Fleck, Jr. Mrs. Hazel G. Karshner John F. Casey William G. Jacobs Thomas W. Kahle Kenneth L. Karst David S. Cupps William D. Jamieson David A. Orlins Mrs. Carolyn B. Keller Nancy Cupps Robert E. Levey Lynette Overbey David A. Kelly Richard A. Hall Charles R. Naylor Terry Overbey James P. Kennedy Thomas H. Lindsey Jerome Phillips R. L. Richards Mr. & Mrs. William E. Knepper Stephen G. Meckler John B. Rohyans Robert S. Schwartz Mrs. Carmen Kniffin Earl M. Spector Thomas J. Shumard Stephen J. Stanford Mr. & Mrs. Warren E. Lambert Thomas M. Tyack Frank M. Wells Dr. Harriet Lattin Robert W. Werth Total: $1,165.90 Total: $535.00 Mrs. Sally A. Loos James F. White, Jr. Class of 1976 Class of 1970 Mrs. Mirian C. Lucas Total: $4,992.18 Samuel R. Cook, Jr. Douglas E. Ebert Mrs. Helen W. Lyman Class of 1966 Theodore P. Frericks IV Gerald L. Jones A. D. MacDonell, Jr. William J. Kelly Paul A. Bernardini Roger H. Norman Mrs. Mary McNamara John S. Pickrel Gregory Lockhart Mrs. Roy Markus Thomas A. Brennon Robert M. McGreevey Martin O. Coyle, Jr. Kenneth M. Royalty Mrs. Pauline B. Marshall Joseph Van Buskirk Craig P. Morton Robert E. Mathews Lawrence R. Elleman Diane D. Schenke L. Craig Hallows Total: $170.00 Mrs. Earl N. Merwin Judith Swanson The Metropolitan Bank of Frederick E. Henning, Jr. Class of 1971 Total: $170.00 Lima, Ohio Charles H. Hire William R. Cobourn Joel H. Mirman Class of 1977 Daniel J. Minor Philip Cramer Mrs. Patricia S. Mosholder John W. Noecker Mark B. Barnes Thomas A. Frericks N. P. Neds Michael D. Saad Alden B. Chevlen Gary D. Greenwald Mrs. Nancy K. Noecker Bruce L. Smith Jeff D. Drushal Robert J. Haverkamp Mrs. Suzanne B. Northcraft J. Mac Alpine Smith Patrick Goebel Michael H. Mearan Mrs. Roberta M. Pazol John P. Wingard John Guendelsberger Richard S. Mickley Peat, Marwich, Mitchell David J. Zendell Bruce R. Lowry David A. Samsel Foundation Total: $1,075.00 Total: $2,150.00 Total: $70.00 Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur Class of 1967 Class of 1972 Mrs. Sally B. Riebel Martin D. Altmaier John J. Bogniard Grand Total: $196,347.58 Dr. Stewart M. Rose Walter J. Blakey James R. Cooper Mrs. Shirely G. Schlafman Mary Ann Brennon John M. Eufinger Mrs. Geneva E. Schuler David L. Day Michael Haney Mrs. Ann Schwartz Robert T. Lowe Jeffrey A. Halm Non-Alumni Mrs. Margaret Speer Gerald Office, Jr. Stephen W. King Lawrence D. Stanley Frank D. Ray Michael P. Mahony Donors Mrs. Edith W. Starin Trust Fund Harold E. Saxton Ronald L. Rowland Mrs. Janet H. Adams Mrs. Carol S. Strip Daniel J. Swillinger Kurt L. Schultz Alcoa Foundation Mrs. Mary Lou Swartz Ronald J. Zeller Robert V. Secrist Mrs. Jane R. Alloway Mrs. Marilyn H. Taggart Total: $1,730.00 Suzan Barnes Thomas Mrs. Dorothy G. Ballou Mrs. Mary Beale Thomas Mrs. Anna N. Beetham Total: $155.00 Mrs. Ida Topper Class of 1968 John N. Botti Mrs. Martha F. Turpin Class of 1973 Gerald L. Baker Mr. & Mrs. Morris J. Brown Mrs. Mary Van Buskirk Donald L. Bleich Robert L. Beals Mrs. Priscilla L. Brown Mrs. Arthur I. Vorys John A. Cervay Jeffrey M. Clery Olive Busick Mrs. Helen P. Watkins John P. DiFalco William J. Davis Mr. & Mrs. Forrest J. Cavalier Mr. & Mrs. Ray B. Watts George W. Hairston Joseph D. Epps Jack H. Chabot James F. White, Sr. Douglas B. Harper John Garmhauser Mrs. Christine D. Cline James M. Wiles William J. Hamann Geoffrey Goll Mrs. Janice Cook David E. Williamson George M. Hauswirth William J. McGraw III Mr. & Mrs. Richard Crampton Mrs. Sally A. Wiper Mark D. Keller John T. Mills Mrs. Thelma D. Dagger Yassenoff Foundation John W. Kenesey Charles M. Piacintino Mrs. Suzanne B. DeWoody Mrs. Helen W. Zelkowitz James W. Luse Ronald J. Scharer Mrs. Bonnie C. Drushal Frederick M. Mann Joseph E. Scuro, Jr. J. Richard Emens 87 Donors Velta Melnbrencis Total: $2,505.00 Evans Adhesive Corp. Total: $40,870.53 23 Alumnotes 1946 1951 W. Howard Fort, senior partner, Schwab, Robert M. Brown, is a judge, Court of Grosenbaugh, Fort and Seamon Co., Common Pleas, Family Court Center, Akron, was recently elected to the board of Dayton, Ohio. If you would like to write to any of directors, The Ohio Bell Telephone 1954 your classmates, please feel free to call Company, Cleveland. the College of Law Office John M. Adams, partner, Porter, Wright, (614-422-2631) and ask for their Morris & Arthur, Columbus, was president, 1947 of the Ohio Bar Association and was the addresses and telephone numbers. We recipient of the Service to the Legal will be happy to provide them, if they William H. Huber, Jr., University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, is dean, University Profession Award. are available. College/professor, School of Management. Kenneth E. Krouse, has been appointed commissioner of the Division of Securities, 1948 the Ohio Department of Commerce. George D. Massar, is president, State Automobile Mutual Insurance Co., 1956 1914 Columbus. Edwin J. Dubiel, is Deputy Attorney General, State of California, Department of Hiram L. Connett, has retired. William S. Moore, St. Petersburg, Florida, is retired. Justice, Los Angeles. 1916 John L. Schwabe, Portland, Oregon, was Col. Vaugh E. Hill, is staff judge Demas L. Sears, has retired. recently elected Oregon State Delegate to advocate, U.S. Air Force, electronic the American Bar Association’s House of systems division, Air Force Systems 1924 Delegates. Command, Hanscom AFB, Massachusetts. Edward J. Denison, Phoenix, Arizona, is 1958 retired and writes a column for several 1949 newspapers. Richard C. Neal, is county clerk/recorder, David L. Huprich, is Vice County of Santa Cruz, California. President/general counsel, Coldwell Banker Commercial Brokerage Company, 1925 Arthur I. Vorys, partner, Vorys, Sater, Arthur R. Cline, senior partner, Cline, Seymour & Pease, Columbus, recently Los Angeles. Bishoff & Cook, Toledo, Ohio, received received the Service to the Legal John C. Burkholder, Columbus, is legal the 1979 Distinguished Lawyer Award of Profession Award from the Ohio Bar counsel and vice president, Central Ohio the College of Law Alumni Association, Association. Council, Boy Scouts of America. University of Toledo. Art Cline, ’25, reports that classmate J. Had Beatty now lives in Aurora, Colorado and is the oldest living past president of the Toledo Bar Association. News for Alumnotes Sidney DeLamar Jackson, Jr., Shaker Please use the space below to send news about you or your classmates. Tell us Hts., Ohio, has retired. about promotions, honors, appointments, marriages, births, travels, hobbies & retirements. Use of this form will help guarantee inclusion of your news in an 1934 upcoming issue of the magazine. J. Paul McNamara, Columbus, received Name Class year. the Ohio State Bar Association’s Ohio Bar (Please print name) Medal for “unusually meritorious service to Street the profession, community and humanity.” 1935 City__ State. Zip code. Abraham Gertner, and Michael H. □ Check here if this is a new address. Gertner (1957) have formed the partnership of Gertner and Gertner, for the Alumnotes news general practice of law in Columbus. Paul Vernon House, Newark, Ohio, has retired. 1936 John L. Gushman, past chairman of OSU’s Board of Trustees, now resides in Naples, Florida. Paul W. Barrett, Delaware, Ohio, has retired. 1939 Eugene J. Mahoney, has joined the firm of Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, Send to Mrs. Pat Johnson, OSU Law Record, College of Law, The Ohio State Columbus, Ohio. University, 1659 North High Street, Columbus, Ohio 43210 Rollin L. Petersen, Cincinnati, has retired.

24 1 9 6 0 Charles R. Petree II, attorney with Joseph J. Cox, is assistant division Sheila P. Cooley, is assistant attorney George, Greek, King, McMahon & counsel, engineering division, U.S. Army, general, Antitrust Division, Columbus. McConnaughey, Columbus, is president of Aiea, Hawaii. Jeff Kaplan has left OSU Office of the Columbus Bar Association. Curtis Griffith, Jr., is deputy director, Business and Administration to become 1961 Ohio Disaster Services Agency, Director of Admissions at the University of Worthington, Ohio. Vermont. James L. Caplinger, is on the staff, international urban research, Charles F. Kenneth M. Royalty, is assistant resident Kettering Foundation, Dayton, Ohio. attorney with The Prudential Insurance Company, Cincinnati, Ohio. 1977 1963 Randall Dicks, is staff attorney with Larry VanFossen, is president of 1971 Southwest Pennsylvania Legal Aid Society, ChemLawn Corp., Worthington, Ohio. Norman E. Brague, is director of law, Washington. Stephen M. Miller, is judge, Franklin City of Wadsworth, Ohio. Nan Teitelbaum Ellis, is a business law County Municipal Court, Columbus. William J. Hutchins III, is general instructor at Michigan State University. counsel/secretary, The Galbreath Mortgage Erin Moriarty, Columbus, has joined 1964 Company, Columbus. QUBE-TV and will host its nightly Patrick J. Morin, has been elected Albert Rusnak, Jr., is vice COLUMBUS ALIVE program. The former corporate president of Griswold-Eshleman president/secretary, of Acceleration co-host of WCMH-TV’s PM MAGAZINE Co., Ohio’s largest advertising agency. Company, Columbus. won a regional emmy this year for her Thomas C. Coady, partner, Porter, segment on this program. Wright, Morris & Arthur, Columbus, 1972 received a Service to the Legal Profession Clair M. Carlin, attorney with Award from the Ohio Bar Association. McLaughlin, DiBlasio & Harshman Co., Jon R. Spahr, is judge, Licking County Warren, Ohio, was named law director, 1978 Municipal Court, Newark, Ohio. Newton Falls, Ohio. Roger C. Blocher, Columbus, is with IBM Michael P. Mahoney, partner, Knepper, and won the 1978 United States Law 1965 White, Arter & Hadden, Columbus, was Week Award. Robert H. McNaghton, is executive vice presented a Service to the Legal Profession Bruce P. Gudenkauf, attorney, Columbus, president, Buckeye Federal Savings & Award from the Ohio Bar Association. is with the permit division, Ohio Loan Association, Columbus. 1973 Department of Liquor Control. 1966 Susan Garner Eisenman, attorney, 1979 James H. Bradner, Jr., is senior attorney, Columbus, is also a member of the board David L. Feldwisch, is an attorney with national strategy program, National District of the Columbus Area Leadership the Marathon Oil Company, Findlay, Attorney’s Association Economic Crime Program. Ohio. Project, Chicago, Illinois. Mario C. Grant, is with the Department of Michael Fusco, is with Alexander, 1967 Justice Immigration and Naturalization Ebinger, Holschuh, Fisher & McAlister, Service, Washington, D.C. Columbus. Frank Ray, Director of the Small Business Administration office in Columbus, is Michael J. Kuhlman, is assistant circuit Suzanne Higgins, is with the Office of transferring to Helena, Montana. executive, U.S. Court of Appeals, Proceedings, Interstate Commerce Washington, D.C. Commission, Washington, D.C. 1974 Jeffrey T. Hodge, is a law assistant, with 1968 Marathon Oil Company, Findlay, Ohio. John W. Garland, is co-director/chief Stephen D. Walters, is general counsel, Michele Woodard reports that she passed counsel, Legal Services of the Coastal Cuyahoga County Hospital, Cleveland. the New York Bar and has a bar review Plain, Ahoskie, North Carolina. course to recommend. 1969 1975 Daniel R. Shirey, received a doctor of Norah M. King, Columbus, clerked for medicine degree, June 9, from the Loyola Judge Kinneary for four years, until the University Stritch School of Medicine. birth of her second child this past summer. Alan B. Smith III, resigned as Minority Deaths in the Law School Patricia Gilchrist Roberts, is adjunct Counsel, Ohio House of Representatives in family professor of law, Wake Forest University, September, 1978, and joined the Raymond V. Shepler, ’16; Fred E. Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Government Relations staff of Nationwide Renkert, ’18; Raymond A. Younger, ’22; Insurance. He is currently serving as Area Arthur E. Thornton, is a consultant, Clayton E. Crafts, ’24; Paul W. Vale, ’27; Legislative Representative for New York Senate Office of Research, Sacramento, E. Blair Amos, ’29; Thomas E. Crock, Sr., and Pennsylvania. California. ’29; Montgomery Campbell, ’29; Richard Robert M. Strapp, is Urbana (Ohio) City L. Garnett, ’29; David H. Thomas, ’29; John S. Steinhauer, attorney with Director of Law. Ralph E. Carhart, ’31; Mary E. Prentice, Amer, Cunningham & Brennan Co., ’36; Charles C. Smith, ’38; Robert H., Akron, Ohio, has been named to a 9-year David C. Winters, is senior assistant prosecuting attorney, Franklin County Jones, III, ’39; Harold D. Roth, ’41; Jack term on the Board of Trustees at Akron F. Young, ’42; Frank Woychik, ’51; University. Prosecutor’s Office, Columbus. George T. Garek, ’57; Jack T. Gammon, 1976 ’60; Terrence J. Morse, ’73; and Lucy R. 1970 Herman, ’77. Alexander J. Bolla, is an assistant law Marshall Bell, is living in St. Thomas, professor at Samford University, Virgin Islands, sails and scuba dives in his spare time. Birmingham, Alabama. The Ohio State University College of Law 1659 North High Street Columbus, Ohio 43210