Operation Decisive Storm : عوﺿوﻣﻟا مﺳا Thwarting Iran's Maritime

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Operation Decisive Storm : عوﺿوﻣﻟا مﺳا Thwarting Iran's Maritime Operation Decisive Storm : ωϭοϭϣϟ΍ϡγ΍ Thwarting Iran's maritime stranglehold : ωϭοϭϣϟ΍ϥ΍ϭϧϋ 09/04/2015 : έηϧϟ΍ΦϳέΎΗ ΏΎϳΩΩϣΣ΃ : ΏΗΎϛϟ΍ϡγ΍ : ωϭοϭϣϟ΍ The successive events in Yemen, following the launch of Saudi-led Operation Decisive Storm of a ten-country coalition in the early hours of 26 March, have been raising questions about the rationale as to what are the reasons and exigencies that made these countries deem it necessary to take part in this military operation regardless of its possible risks and aftermath. Are these reasons and exigencies purely ideological and sectarian? Do they involve crucial geostrategic implications linked to Yemen's strategic regional and international importance that became even greater particularly because of its control of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait at the sole southern entrance of the Red Sea from Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean? Is this rationale being driven by the concerns that many stakeholders have over Iran's possible takeover of this regionally and internationally important strait through their allies, the Houthi rebels? Yemen's strategic importanceYemen's 2500 kilometer-long coastline is among the most important coastal strips in the Arab region and the Middle East as it stretches along the Red Sea, Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean. Yemen also has more than ten major seaports, and strategic islands that several states continue to attempt to control. These include Kamaran, Socotra, Hanish Islands, and ten others including the strategic island of Meon in the heart of the Yemeni-controlled Bab el-Mandeb Strait, the strategic gateway that regional and international powers have never ceased their attempts to control.An estimated 21,000 ships pass through the strategic waterway in both directions in a continuous stream (between 50-60 ships of various sizes everyday) carrying 30% of the world's seaborne-traded oil and accounting for 7% of the global sea traffic.Military presence in the regionThe beginnings of U.S. military presence in this region date back to the past century when the U.S. Military established its Kagnew radio station as a military installation in Asmara, Eritrea on the Horn of Africa, as per an agreement with Ethiopia. Later in 1980, the U.S. consolidated its presence in Somalia and Kenya six years after ousting Emperor Haile Selassie of Ethiopia.The failure of US military intervention in Somalia in 1993 dissuaded the U.S. away from attempting direct intervention in the region. But the 9/11 attacks in 2011 led to a shift in the US strategy that mandated large-scale redeployment of U.S. military bases around the world. As a result, Combined Joint Task Force-Horn of Africa was established on 19 October 2002 as part of anti-terror Operation Enduring Freedom that operated from aboard USS Mount Whitney command ship in the Gulf of Aden until 2003 when the mission moved ashore to Camp Lemonnier in Djibouti City following an access agreement with the Djiboutian government. Four thousand U.S. soldiers are stationed at this base where UAVs are launched against targets in Yemen, the Horn of Africa as part of counter- terrorism operations.In addition to its role as a regional policeman and an essential counter-terrorism and counter-extremism military power, Ethiopia is considered as a major regional weight by the White House's strategy for controlling international navigation routes. During the rule of Ethiopian leader Meles Zenawi, Washington's annual aid to Addis Ababa amounted to US$800 million. In Ethiopia, the US also has Arba Minch drone base and Dire Dawa camp for Army commandos. By 2011, the Combined Joint Task Force-Horn of Africa (CJTF-HOA) expanded its responsibilities to include all the Horn of Africa and operated under CENTCOM until October 2008 when it became part of United States Africa Command (U.S. AFRICOM) which was established in February 2007.The issue of piracy contributed to the expansion of military presence in this region as UN Security Council Resolutions allowed foreign states to deploy military ships in the waters of Horn of Africa to counter pirates. The European Union then launched Operation Atlanta, also known as European Union Naval Force Somalia (EU-NAVFOR-ATALANTA) in December 2008. Iran, China, Japan, Russia, India and South Korea followed suit and deployed military ships to the region as part of the international scramble for influence. Despite France's withdrawal from most of its colonies in Africa, France still maintains its naval base in Djibouti, and in 2010 started to build an anti-piracy base in partnership and coordination with the Yemeni government. In this context, an agreement was signed between Somalia and the UAE in late 2014 to bolster their military cooperation. GCC and the Iranian strangleholdAccording to Western reports, Iran seeks to develop and military strategy to 2025 to deploy its naval forces from the Strait of Hormuz, the Red Sea and even to Strait of Mallaca. Iran would be able to threaten maritime oil tanker traffic by controlling Strait of Hormuz, on the one hand, and Bab el-Mandeb on the other, using the Houthis, its Yemeni allies who took control of the port of Hodeidah. This would put new cards in Iran's hands to utilize in its regional and international relations.This proved Yemeni President Abd Rabbuh Mansur Hadi right when he said in January that whoever holds the keys to Bab el-Mandeb and the Strait of Hormuz does not need a nuclear bomb. That is because Yemen is considered by the Gulf states as the their "weak flank" where no developments should ever be ignored or taken for granted. For Iran, Somalia is also one of the most strategically important locations that it needs to tighten its stranglehold on the Gulf countries and Egypt.Egypt's concerns over Suez CanalHouthis' control of Yemen poses a direct threat to Egypt's national security, namely the Suez Canal traffic and the new expansions. Egypt collects around US5.6 billion a year in canal tolls accounting for 10% of Egypt's foreign currency earnings. That is why Egypt's stances were decisive and clear on the developments in Yemen. In early October 2014, the chairman of the Suez Canal Authority, Mohab Mamish, said that Egypt will not allow the Houthis to take control of the Bab el-Mandab Strait because it 9/27/2021 10:30:44 PM 1 / 2 affects the Suez Canal and its traffic. In February, Mamish said that Egypt will not accept any threats to the southern gateway to the Red Sea (Bab el-Mandeb) because the security of the canal and the strait is indivisible.Iranian-Israeli vying for influence in EritreaAs part of its strategy for expansion into the Horn of African, Iran maintains a presence in Eritrea on the other side of the Red Sea's strategic Bab el-Mandeb. This presence is still mysterious because both countries keep discreet about it. In May 2008, Eritrea's Isaias Afwerki, visited Tehran to sign a number of agreements to promote cooperation between the two countries in the domains of trade and investment.In 2009, after Eritrea declared its support for Iran's nuclear program, Iran's Bank Saderat Iran (BSI) transferred US$35 million in aid to Eritrea to support its economy. Several experts maintain that Iran has benefited from its presence in this region to train the Houthi fighters at Dongolo camp in Eritrea and smuggle arms into Yemen. In exchange for its military base in Eritrea's Assab port city, Iran supplies Eritrea with cheap oil.On the hand, there is much talk about the Israeli presence in Eritrea, especially in the light of their bilateral relations often described as "unique" as they also exchange visits. Reports show that Israel maintains military and intelligence presence at Eritrea's Dahlak Archipelago, located at the entrance of the Red Sea, and at Massawa port, where Israel can monitor ship traffic through the Bab el-Mandeb Strait.The following points have to be made in this context:Israeli intelligence reports note that the Red Sea is one of the safest waterways for sending logistic supplies to Hezbollah in Lebanon, and therefore can be an alternative to the Syrian route in the future.Israel has concerns over the expansion of extremist Islamist groups in many African regions, particularly in major conflict zones and high-tension areas, where the weakness or even collapse of the state is a reality, with Somalia being just one of the instances.Israel has growing concerns over Al Qaeda's increasing activities where Yemen is the best launching pad for the organization's operations in the Arabian Peninsula especially after the U.S. withdrew its remaining military personnel from an air base in Aden, closed its embassy in Sanaa City, and suspended its attacks against Al Qaeda positions.Israel is attempting to tighten the noose around the regime of Sudan's President Omar Hassan Al Bashir which maintains an "ideal" relationship with Iran, long accused by Israel of smuggling arms into Gaza Strip through the Red Sea and Sudanese territory which was the target of several Israeli military attacks.Turkey is the third rivalTurkey has always been involved in rivalry over the region. To further Turkey's strong relations with Sudan, Ahmet Davutoglu, then Minister of Foreign Affairs, visited Eritrea in November 2012. One year later, the Turkish Embassy was inaugurated in Eretria and the Eritrean Embassy in Doha, Qatar, authorized a representative to be based in Ankara. In August 2014, Turkish Airlines started regular flights between Istanbul and Asmara. Turkey also led an emergency Organization of the Islamic Cooperation (OIC) conference in Istanbul where member countries pledged US$350 million in aid to fight famine in Somalia.
Recommended publications
  • Eritrea-Yemen Arbitration (Award, Phase Ii: Maritime Delimitation)
    2000] INTERNATIONAL DECISIONS In the United States, state courts have long been aware that well-reasoned decisions eval- uating the state interests that must be taken into account in determining the scope of fed- erally protected rights can help to elicit deference to state law from the U.S. Supreme Court. Municipal courts in Europe are also learning that well-reasoned decisions are more likely to elicit deference from regional international tribunals, be itin the context of the principle of subsidiarity in the European Community or in the context of the margin of appreciation under the European Convention on Human Rights. Ifnothing else, this case may help nurture a similar attitude in municipal courts generally, at least with respect to treaty obligations that may well be invoked before an international tribunal with compulsoryjurisdiction. 54 Notwithstanding the delay in instituting proceedings in the present case, the need for urgency in prompt-release cases makes it likely that only the decision of a municipal trial court, and not that of an appellate court, will ordinarily be available at the time the Tribunal is seized. Although trial courts are accustomed to the idea that their decisions will be reviewed, they are also accustomed to the considerable freedom afforded them by appellate courts on certain matters. It is likely that appellate courts, once they articulate the relevant considerations and standards, only episodically manifest an interest in fact-sensitive "trial management" matters such as bond. The underlying point of this case is that the Tribunal is not a municipal appellate court applying municipal law. BERNARD H.
    [Show full text]
  • A Revised Look at the Hanish-Islands Arbitration the Dual Role of Diplomacy and Inter-State Arbitration to Force Lasting Resolution of Military Conflicts
    A Revised Look at the Hanish-islands Arbitration The Dual Role of Diplomacy and Inter-state Arbitration to Force Lasting Resolution of Military Conflicts Cornel Marian* Abstract ……………………………………………………….…….... 246 1 Introduction …………………………………………….…………….. 246 2 From Military Conflict to Inter-state Arbitration …………….…… 248 2.1 Two Distressed Nations Come into Direct Conflict …….……….. 248 2.2 Swift Intervention by the United Nations and the Containment of the Threat to Resume Conflict ……...………. 250 2.3 The Framework for the Arbitration ………………….……........... 252 3 The Tribunal’s Important Findings …………………………............ 253 3.1 Fundamental Differences over the Scope of the Dispute (Phase I) …………………………………………..……... 253 3.2 Resolving Conflicting Historical Claims to Territorial Sovereignty and Avoiding Non-Liquet (Phase I) ……….……… 254 3.3 Phase I and II: Rights that Reflect the Parties’ Concerns From Islamic Law to Artisanal Fishing ………………….………. 256 3.4 Phase II: Delimiting Territories ………………………….………. 257 4 Eritrea/Yemen Proceedings in the Current Age …………….……... 257 5 Conclusion ………………………………………..…………………... 259 246 Cornel Marian: A Revised Look at the Hanish-islands Arbitration Abstract Recent events in Yemen have highlighted the devastating impact military conflicts and conflicting claims to sovereignty have on the general population. In respect to its maritime border with Eritrea (itself a young and conflict-torn nation), Yemen appears to be relatively stable in part as the result of a sustainable solution from a series of diplomatic and legal efforts culminating in two notable arbitration awards. While conflict between Yemen and Eritrea broke out in 1995 over the control of the Hanish Islands, the prompt intervention of the then-UN Secretary General Boutros Boutros-Ghali brought the two warring nations to agree to submit the territorial dispute to inter-state arbitration.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydraulic Interpretation of Direct Velocity Measurements in the Bab Al Mandab*
    NOVEMBER 1999 PRATT ET AL. 2769 Hydraulic Interpretation of Direct Velocity Measurements in the Bab al Mandab* L. J. PRATT Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts WILLIAM JOHNS Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Miami, Miami, Florida STEPHEN P. M URRAY Coastal Studies Institute, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana KATSUROU KATSUMATA Department of Earth and Planetary Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (Manuscript received 5 February 1997, in ®nal form 14 October 1998) ABSTRACT Acoustic Doppler Current Pro®ler velocity measurements in the Bab al Mandab during the period June 1995± March 1996 are used to assess the hydraulic character of the exchange ¯ow. The strait is 150 km long and contains two distinct geometrical choke points: the Hanish sill and Perim narrows. The authors use a three-layer approximation of the monthly mean velocity and density structure at the sill and narrows to calculate the phase speeds of the ®rst and second internal, long gravity waves. The ®rst (second) mode is generally characterized by in-phase (out-of-phase) motions of the two interfaces. The calculations take cross-strait topographic variations into consideration by using a piecewise linear representation of the actual bottom. The resulting phase speeds are used to determine whether the ¯ow is subcritical, supercritical, or critical with respect to the ®rst and second modes. Subcritical (supercritical) means that the two wave pairs corresponding to a given mode propagate in opposite (the same) directions, whereas ``critical'' means that one or both members of a pair has zero phase speed. Critical or supercritical conditions are indications of hydraulic control and imply that signal propagation through the strait associated with a particular mode can occur in only one direction, or perhaps not at all.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Stage of the Proceedings Between Eritrea and Yemen (Maritime Delimitation)
    REPORTS OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAL AWARDS RECUEIL DES SENTENCES ARBITRALES Second stage of the proceedings between Eritrea and Yemen (Maritime Delimitation) 17 December 1999 VOLUME XXII pp. 335-410 NATIONS UNIES - UNITED NATIONS Copyright (c) 2006 Part IV Award of the Arbitral Tribunal in the second stage of the proceedings between Eritrea and Yemen (Maritime Delimitation) Decision of 17 December 1999 Sentence du Tribunal arbitral rendue au terme de la seconde étape de la procédure entre l'Erythrée et la République du Yémen (Délimitation maritime) Décision du 17 décembre 1999 334 ERITREA / YEMEN AWARD OF THE ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL IN THE SECOND STAGE OF THE PROCEEDINGS BETWEEN ERITREA AND YEMEN (MARI- TIME DELIMITATION), 17 DECEMBER 1999 SENTENCE DU TRIBUNAL ARBITRAL RENDUE AU TERME DE LA SECONDE ÉTAPE DE LA PROCÉDURE ENTRE L'ERYTHRÉE ET LA RÉPUBLIQUE DU YÉMEN (DÉLIMITATION MARITIME), 17 DÉCEMBRE 1999 Median line and historic median line — Methods of measurement — Principle of equidistance — Baselines: high water-line, low water-line, median line - "normal baseline", "straight baseline" — Geodeic line. — Presence of mid sea islands — Principle of proportionality as a test of equi- tableness and not a method of delimitation — Requirement of an equitable solution. Non-geographical relevant circumstances: fishing, security, principle of non-encroachment — Relevance of fishing in acceptance or rejecting the argument as to the line of delimitation: location of fishing areas, economic dependency on fishing, effect of fishing practices on the lines of delimitation — "catastrophic" and "long usage" tests — "artisanal fishing", "industrial fish- ing", and associated rights. The drawing of the initial boundary line does not depend on the existence and the protec- tion of the traditional fishing regime.
    [Show full text]
  • The Regional Organization for the Conservation of the Environment of the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden (PERSGA)
    The Regional Organization for the Conservation of the Environment of the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden (PERSGA) Regional Action Plan for the Conservation of Breeding Seabirds and their Habitats in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden Draft 27 April 2004 April 2004 PERSGA is an intergovernmental organisation dedicated to the conservation of coastal and marine environments and the wise use of the natural resources in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden region. The Regional Convention for the Conservation of the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden Environment (Jeddah Convention) 1982 provides the legal foundation for PERSGA. The Secretariat of the Organization was formally established in Jeddah following the Cairo Declaration of September 1995. The PERSGA member states are Djibouti, Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. PERSGA, P.O. Box 53662, Jeddah 21583, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Tel.: +966-2-657-3224. Fax: +966-2-652-1901. Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.persga.org This document was prepared through the Habitat and Biodiversity Conservation component of the Strategic Action Programme for the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden, a Global Environment Facility project executed by PERSGA and implemented by the GEF partners - United Nations Development Programme, the United Nations Environment Programme and the World Bank. Supplementary funding was provided by the Islamic Development Bank and the PERSGA member states. © 2004 PERSGA The text of this publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without the permission of the copyright holders provided that acknowledgement of the source is given.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Report 2012 (English Version, PDF File)
    Disclaimer This report was compiled by an ADRC visiting researcher (VR) from ADRC member countries. The views expressed in the report do not necessarily reflect the views of the ADRC. The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on the maps in the report also do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the ADRC. 1 MONEER ABDULLAH MOHAMMED AL-MASNI GEOLOGICAL SURVEY & MINERAL RESOURCES BOARD (SEISMOLOGICAL AND VOLCANOLOGICAL OBSERVATORY CENTER) 2 1. General information 1.1 Physiography Yemen is a Middle Eastern country located on the Arabian Peninsula in southwest Asia between latitudes 12° and 19° N and longitudes 42° and 55° E. The country is bordered by Saudi Arabia to the north, the Red Sea to the west, the Arabian Sea and Gulf of Aden to the south and Oman to the east. The Bab-al-Mandab strait in the south-west of Yemen is divided by Mayoon Island into two parts that control the passage to the strait. Yemen’s territory includes a number of Red Sea islands, including the Hanish Islands, Kamaran and Perim, as well as Socotra - the largest Yemini Island (3,650 sq. km) in the Arabian Sea, which is 510 km from the mainland coast 1.2 Topography The country’s topography consist of Coastal plains, Mountains highlands, Mountains Basins, plateau area and Deserts area. It is divided to several regions as show in the map and explain as following bellow: The Coastal Plains The coastal plain is an extension of the southern coast of Yemen overlooking Figure 1-2 Topography map of Yemen 3 the Gulf of Aden and the Arabian Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Replyofthe Government of Nicaragua
    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE MARITIME DELIMITATI ON BETWEEN NICARAGUA AND HONDURAS IN THE CARIBBEAN SEA (NICARAGUA v. HONDURAS) REPLYOFTHE GOVERNMENT OF NICARAGUA VOLUME! 13 JANUARY 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... 1 1. Brief Reminder of the Procedure ............................................................ 1 Il. Main Issue in Dispute ........................................................................... 2 Ill. Outline of the Reply ............................................................................. 3 CHAPTER 1: MAIN FEATURES OF THE HONDURAN COUNTER- MEMORIAL ................................................................................................... 5 1. Points of Agreement of the Parties ......................................................... 5 A. }URISDICTION OF THE COURT AND ADMISSIBILITY OF THE APPLICA Tl ON .......•....• 5 B. OBJECT OF THE DISPUTE ......••...................••..•...•.••.....•....•.•.....•.....••.•..•....• 6 C. PARTIAL AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES CONCERNING THE MARITIME DELIMITATION ··············································································································· 8 Il. The Honduran Case as Presented in the Counter-Memorial ............... 11 A. THE HONDURAN POSTULA TES ................................................................. 11 B. HONDURAS IGNORES THE RULES AND PRINCIPLES OF MARITIME DELIMITATION. 14 CHAPTER II: MARITIME DELIMITATION: THE METHODOLOGY ADOPTED
    [Show full text]
  • Integration Matters: Rethinking the Architecture of International Dispute Resolution
    University of Colorado Law School Colorado Law Scholarly Commons Articles Colorado Law Faculty Scholarship 2010 Integration Matters: Rethinking the Architecture of International Dispute Resolution Anna Spain University of Colorado Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/articles Part of the Courts Commons, Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons, International Law Commons, and the Jurisprudence Commons Citation Information Anna Spain, Integration Matters: Rethinking the Architecture of International Dispute Resolution, 32 U. PA. J. INT'L L. 1 (2010), available at https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/articles/1243. Copyright Statement Copyright protected. Use of materials from this collection beyond the exceptions provided for in the Fair Use and Educational Use clauses of the U.S. Copyright Law may violate federal law. Permission to publish or reproduce is required. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Colorado Law Faculty Scholarship at Colorado Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of Colorado Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline Mon Nov 11 13:04:51 2019 Citations: Bluebook 20th ed. Anna Spain, Integration Matters: Rethinking the Architecture of International Dispute Resolution, 32 U. Pa. J. Int'l L. 1 (2010). ALWD 6th ed. Anna Spain, Integration Matters: Rethinking the Architecture of International Dispute Resolution, 32 U. Pa. J. Int'l L. 1 (2010). APA 6th ed. Spain, A. (2010). Integration matters: Rethinking the architecture of international dispute resolution. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, 32(1), 1-56.
    [Show full text]
  • Arabian Peninsula
    THE CONSERVATION STATUS AND DISTRIBUTION OF THE BREEDING BIRDS OF THE ARABIAN PENINSULA Compiled by Andy Symes, Joe Taylor, David Mallon, Richard Porter, Chenay Simms and Kevin Budd ARABIAN PENINSULA The IUCN Red List of Threatened SpeciesTM - Regional Assessment About IUCN IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, helps the world find pragmatic solutions to our most pressing environment and development challenges. IUCN’s work focuses on valuing and conserving nature, ensuring effective and equitable governance of its use, and deploying nature-based solutions to global challenges in climate, food and development. IUCN supports scientific research, manages field projects all over the world, and brings governments, NGOs, the UN and companies together to develop policy, laws and best practice. IUCN is the world’s oldest and largest global environmental organization, with almost 1,300 government and NGO Members and more than 15,000 volunteer experts in 185 countries. IUCN’s work is supported by almost 1,000 staff in 45 offices and hundreds of partners in public, NGO and private sectors around the world. www.iucn.org About the Species Survival Commission The Species Survival Commission (SSC) is the largest of IUCN’s six volunteer commissions with a global membership of around 7,500 experts. SSC advises IUCN and its members on the wide range of technical and scientific aspects of species conservation, and is dedicated to securing a future for biodiversity. SSC has significant input into the international agreements dealing with biodiversity conservation. About BirdLife International BirdLife International is the world’s largest nature conservation Partnership. BirdLife is widely recognised as the world leader in bird conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Peace and Security in the Horn of Africa: Eritrea's View
    Permanent Mission of Eritrea ቀዋሚ ሚሽን ኤርትራ ኣብ ሕቡራት ሃገራት اﻟﺒﻌﺜﺔ اﻷرﺗﺮﻳﺔ اﻟﺪاﺋﻤﺔ ﻟﺪى اﻷﻣﻢ اﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪة To the United Nations _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Peace and Security in the Horn of Africa: Eritrea’s View An Information package prepared by The Permanent Mission of Eritrea to the UN New York 16 April 2012 Address: 800 Second Avenue 18th Flr New York, NY 10017; Phone: (212) 687-3390,Fax: (212) 687-31380 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I. Introduction 1. Eritrea has been grappling with several challenges since it emerged as an independent nation in 1991, after several years of bitter armed struggle against Ethiopian colonial rule. The Horn of Africa is a sub-region that has suffered, at this juncture of history, more than its share of conflicts and natural disasters. Yet, despite these daunting obstacles, Eritrea has been focused on the rehabilitation and development of its war ravaged society and economy as well as defending its sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence. The serious efforts towards the achievements of several objectives of the Millennium Development Goals by 2015, including the 17% economic growth registered in 2011 are all testimonies to Eritrea's focus on development. 2. However, Ethiopia's occupation of sovereign Eritrea territories in violation of the “final and binding” delimitation and demarcation decisions of the Eritrea Ethiopia Boundary Commission remains a serious impediment to peace and development in the region. The lack of action by the Security Council on Ethiopia's failure to respect its treaty obligations and its breach of international law has emboldened Ethiopia to up the ante and to publicly announce its futile schemes of overthrowing the Government of Eritrea by military means.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gulf Military Forces in an Era of Asymmetric War Yemen
    Center for Strategic and International Studies Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy 1800 K Street, N.W. • Suite 400 • Washington, DC 20006 Phone: 1 (202) 775 -7325 • Fax: 1 (202) 457 -8746 Web: www.csis.org/burke The Gulf Military Forces in an Era of Asymmetric War Yemen Anthony H. Cordesman Khalid R. Al -Rodhan Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy Visiting Fellow [email protected] [email protected] Working Draft for Review and Comments Revised: June 28, 2006 Cordesman & Al -Rodhan: The Gulf Military Forces in an Era of Asymmetric Wars Yemen 6/28/06 Page 2 Introduction Yemen is not a Gulf country, but it is a major state on the Arabian Peninsula, and one that has long played a major strategic role in Gulf security. As is shown in Map 1 , Yemen has coasts and islands on the Indian Ocean and Red Sea, and occupie s a strategic position at the Bab al -Mandeb – the narrow strait that controls the entrance to the Red Sea and which every ship passing through the Suez Canal must also traverse. Map 1: Yemen Source: CIA, “Yemen,” 2002, available at http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/middle_east_and_asia/yemen_pol_2002.jpg Yemen shares borders with Oman and Saudi Arabia, and there has been a long history of clashes between Yemen (now a federation of the Yemeni Arab Republic (YAR) and People’s Democratic Republic of Yemen (PDRY) ), and Oman and Yemen. Saudi Arabia won a border war with what became the YAR in the 1930s, taking control over the disputed territory – contro l which is still disputed by some Yemeni nationalists.
    [Show full text]
  • Tidal Dynamics in the Bab El Mandab Strait Ewa Jarosz Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected]
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2002 Tidal dynamics in the Bab el Mandab Strait Ewa Jarosz Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons Recommended Citation Jarosz, Ewa, "Tidal dynamics in the Bab el Mandab Strait" (2002). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 4064. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/4064 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. TIDAL DYNAMICS IN THE BAB EL MANDAB STRAIT A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Oceanography and Coastal Sciences by Ewa Jarosz M.S., Louisiana State University, 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................... iv LIST OF FIGURES.......................................................................................................... vii ABSTRACT....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]